Forensic Clarity: Diana West Analyses Of What Karen Kingston Said, And How The Story Jumped The Tracks
Forensic Clarity: Diana West Analyses Of What Karen Kingston Said, And How The Story Jumped The Tracks
No New Information At Press Time About Karen Kingston
Diana West has just published part 2 of her reportage on Karen Kingston, you can read it here.
In a storm blown dark grey sky, one kite is mine, and I hold tight to the handle. What color is my kite?
I’ll say red.
Maybe it’s all I have, maybe it’s all I know:
The difference between light and dark, good and evil, runs between words, rests upon words—sometimes one.
Stick close to people who are able to reproduce to the letter what a person said, without bending it to their own view of the world. Conversely, avoid people who don’t take listening and hearing seriously.
As aside:
Listen to what Warren Buffet, shaped like a Beatrix Potter toad but with none of the charm, had to say, about “mankind” and our future.
The enemy’s use of language is always diseased—opaque, cloudy, worrying, incoherent, royal, and frankly stupid.
Judge people by their listening skills, as well as their re-quoting skills—there will be icebergs of distortion in the ocean crossing ahead.
If that which people were "not buying" on Mark Crispin Miller's Substack is that Karen Kingston didn't say Robert Malone was behind a plot to kill her then they are speaking of things beyond her words. And that CAN be a valid exercise: to imagine what people mean beyond what they say. but FIRST we have to all be on the same page about what WAS said.
I suggest Mark's readers compose a counter-proposal: What DO we know? If we aren't taking Karen Kingston's words as guide-lights, what are we doing?
I just watched your brilliant interview with CHD. So much respect for you and your work! I did not know who you were. I stayed in my mothering bubble for 20+ years while raising my 4 children. I stayed away from the news as much as possible.