And I saw a propagandist headline yesterday mentioning that protesters were gathering in Alaska against the upcoming meeting. Oh my goodness! I grew up in an era where we used to protest AGAINST the brutal wars because we hoped for peace. Now the Soros funded gangs show up IN FAVOR of the war and the normies cheer. The world has literally turned ass backwards!!
Many of us have known what's behind the Ukraine/Russia conflict for three years. The early propaganda supporting Ukraine was sickening, all the Ukraine flag emojis and the Russia hate. All because of the public's ignorance of history, even recent history, and the public's willingness to believe what the government and media tell them.
It is so obvious that Zelensky is a puppet of the globalist cult, installed by the Maidan revolution orchestrated by the Obama admin in 2014, and supported by the EU Russia-haters and war mongers.
It is Zelensky and the EU and the deep state who do NOT want a peace deal. They are still angry that they lost control of their bio weapons labs, their human trafficking operations and their money laundering machine in Ukraine. It is THEY who are responsible for the deaths of so many innocent Ukraine citizens caught up in this conflict.
Thank you!!! I am so sick of everyone making out like Russia & Putin are the ones who started all this. Zelensky is nothing but a cocaine addicted, child & organ trafficking former actor/dancer who is nothing but a puppet. Every time a peace deal is announced he is the one who breaks it & flies drones or attacks Russia in some manner yet all the ridiculous NATO countries treat him like he is some kind of hero. It is really pathetic. Putin went in to destroy the bioweapons labs we (Obama/Biden) set up in Ukraine & stop the adrenochrome & organ harvesting. The one thing Putin asked was not to let Ukraine join NATO & yet they have not only floated that idea but we have military troops in countries surrounding Russia’s borders. How would we react if Russia had troops on our borders?
I seriously doubt whether nuclear weapons exist. Hiroshima and Nagasaki are thriving cities today, just like the the rest of the firebombed cities in Japan and Germany. How is this possible if nuclear weapons reduce cities to radioactive wastelands like we were told? Why was there no detectable differences between bombed out cities like Hiroshima, Tokyo and Dresden?
Michael Palmer visited Hiroshima after the war to see for himself the damage and the effects of nuclear weapons.
There is no doubt that the early weapons testing program was filmed by Hollywood. Looking at them now we can see that the test videos are phony.
Michael Palmer wrote a book about his investigations titled Hiroshima Revisited.
Who said nuclear weapons reduce cities to radioactive wastelands? You have contamination with radioisotopes, that like any contamination can be cleaned up by various means. It just takes time & money. But those were small weapons, ~10kt, modern weapons are 400kt up to 2,000kt. Radioisotope contamination increases proportionately. And you have to have a place to live while the long & expensive and resource & manpower contamination is done. Where you gonna go if all your cities are destroyed?
Hollywood, my ass. There were hundreds of tests done by a half dozen different countries and many, many videos exist of the same. Including citizen videos & witnesses of explosions in Nevada, visible in nearby cities.
Michael Palmer is likely just another CIA disinformation toadie.
CIA: "don't worry serfs, we won't kill you all with our endless wars, no siree, bob, because, because -- there are no nuclear weapons, relax, don't worry, we're the CIA, we're here to keep you safe".
I am 73. I lived through the Cuban Missel Crisis and all the propaganda of the time. It was drummed into us of the dangers of nuclear weapons and what happens after they are used. We were told of radioactivity and the half life of radioactive nuclear materials.
I was in a field artillery unit in Germany. We supposedly had nuclear rounds for our 8" Howitzers. It was all very secretive and the knowledge of them was compartmentalized. It all seemed fake to me. And considering the state of our self propelled artillery at the time, I doubt the quality of the equipment or the troops to operate them.
Of course anything can be contested by labeling it a CIA psyop. Very convenient. I don't buy it, but obviously you do. Some are easily deceived. "By way deception thou shalt do war." -Mossad motto. You know Jews are responsible for most, if not all of the wars, right?
If nuclear weapons really exist, why hasn't someone used them yet? It is obvious that Hiroshima and Nagasaki were faked.
Remember we said that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction. None were found. All a bullshit excuse to go to war.
Iran has stated they are not seeking nuclear weapons. Could they realize they don't exist and choose not to spend the money developing them? I think the whole thing is another CIA psyop.
If you have film of actual nuclear tests, please provide links. Don't send the obviously faked Bikini Atoll or Nevada desert films. If I and the authors can be proven wrong, I will accept the evidence if it exists. I believe in forensics. I don't believe in phony testimony not backed by forensics. Think the Holocaust myth. No forensics, but lots of phony testimony.
There are plenty of destructive weapons. Nukes, especially hydrogen bombs are only intended to be used illegally against civilian populations. They are a method to keep populations in fear. I choose not to fear them. There, I feel better now.
The existence of nuclear weapons and their use in Japan during World War II is supported by extensive historical, scientific, and documentary evidence. Here's a concise overview:
Evidence of Nuclear Weapons' Existence
Scientific Development (Manhattan Project):
The Manhattan Project (1942–1945) was a U.S.-led research program to develop nuclear weapons. Declassified documents, including reports from Los Alamos National Laboratory, detail the physics of nuclear fission, bomb design (e.g., "Little Boy" and "Fat Man"), and successful test at Trinity site (July 16, 1945, Alamogordo, New Mexico).
Key figures like J. Robert Oppenheimer, Enrico Fermi, and others published papers (post-war) on nuclear physics, corroborated by peer-reviewed scientific literature.
Trinity Test:
The first nuclear explosion at Trinity produced a yield of ~20 kilotons of TNT, documented by photographs, seismic data, and radiation measurements. Eyewitness accounts from scientists and military personnel, along with physical evidence like trinitite (fused glass from the blast), confirm the event.
Declassified Government Records:
U.S. National Archives and the Atomic Heritage Foundation contain declassified reports, memos, and correspondence (e.g., Einstein-Szilard letter to Roosevelt, 1939) outlining nuclear weapon development.
The Smyth Report (1945) publicly detailed the Manhattan Project’s work.
Global Nuclear Arsenals:
Post-WWII nuclear tests by the U.S., Soviet Union, and others (e.g., Operation Crossroads, 1946) are documented with video footage, radiation data, and international monitoring. Modern nuclear arsenals are verified by treaties like START, with inspections by organizations like the IAEA.
Evidence of Use in Japan (Hiroshima and Nagasaki, 1945)
Historical Records:
Official U.S. military reports, including those from the 509th Composite Group, document the deployment of "Little Boy" (uranium bomb) on Hiroshima (August 6, 1945) and "Fat Man" (plutonium bomb) on Nagasaki (August 9, 1945).
Japanese government archives, survivor testimonies (hibakusha), and post-war investigations (e.g., U.S. Strategic Bombing Survey) confirm the bombings.
Physical Evidence:
Hiroshima: The Aioi Bridge, near the hypocenter, shows structural damage consistent with a nuclear blast. The Hiroshima Peace Memorial Museum preserves artifacts like melted glass, charred clothing, and photographs of the aftermath.
Nagasaki: Similar physical evidence, including damaged structures like the Urakami Cathedral, aligns with a nuclear explosion.
Blast Effects: Both cities exhibited unique damage patterns (e.g., flash burns, radial destruction, and shadow imprints) consistent with nuclear detonations, not conventional explosives.
Medical and Scientific Evidence:
Survivors displayed acute radiation syndrome (ARS), with symptoms like burns, hair loss, and internal organ damage, documented by Japanese and U.S. medical teams. Long-term effects, like increased cancer rates (e.g., leukemia), were tracked by the Radiation Effects Research Foundation (RERF).
Soil and material samples from both cities show residual radioactivity (e.g., cesium-137, strontium-90), consistent with nuclear fission.
Eyewitness Accounts:
Thousands of survivors (hibakusha) provided consistent accounts of a blinding flash, intense heat, and massive explosion. For example, Setsuko Thurlow’s testimony describes the Hiroshima blast’s immediate effects.
U.S. aircrew (e.g., Enola Gay pilot Paul Tibbets) reported the detonation and observed the mushroom cloud.
Photographic and Video Evidence:
Aerial and ground photographs from Hiroshima and Nagasaki show widespread destruction, with epicenters of near-total annihilation. Films from U.S. and Japanese sources, including post-bombing surveys, corroborate the scale and nature of the damage.
International Confirmation:
Post-war investigations by Allied forces, neutral scientists, and the United Nations confirmed the use of nuclear weapons. Japan’s surrender on August 15, 1945, explicitly referenced the bombs’ devastating power.
Estimated Impact
Hiroshima: ~80,000 immediate deaths, with total casualties (including later deaths from radiation) estimated at 90,000–140,000.
Nagasaki: ~40,000 immediate deaths, with total casualties ~60,000–80,000.
Data comes from RERF, Japanese government records, and U.S. military estimates.
Countering Skepticism
Some fringe theories question the existence of nuclear weapons or their use in Japan, often citing conspiracies or claiming the bombings were staged. These are refuted by:
The overwhelming volume of primary sources (documents, photos, artifacts).
Consistency of physical, medical, and eyewitness evidence.
Independent verification by multiple nations and scientific communities.
Modern nuclear physics, which underpins ongoing nuclear programs and is testable in controlled settings
The guy is either a moron, a grifter or a paid CIA disinformation toadie. Pick one.
Just because you can find some arsehole making a video doesn't make for truth. Find even one Nuclear Physicist who makes those insane claims.
Iran is going to all that immense expense of enriching Uranium to 60% just for fun. Yep.
Trump wants to spend $trillions on a missile defense shield for the USA, just for fun, also. And that's not the first time, Ronald Reagan had a SDI (Strategic Defense Initiative) plan as well, more $trillions.
There is no evidence that nuclear weapons were dropped on Hiroshima or Nagasaki. They were illegally firebombed just like the dozens of cities in Germany and others in Japan. You have been captured by the cult of believers in bullshit. Some people can't be helped.
You are denying Nuclear Energy? What do you think a nuclear reactor is? How does it work? Immense energy from a tiny amount of fuel. You know what a chain reaction is? Nuclear fission? It's pretty simple minded when you know basic physics. It's not rocket science.
A critical mass of U235 or Pu239 and the chain reaction increases exponentially in a matter of milliseconds, releasing immense energy. Basic physics.
Even in early experiments scientists put too much plutonium together, creating a critical mass which then exploded, killing them. Look up "The Demon Core". Happened in Russia also.
Apparently you can't read. I never denied nuclear energy, only nuclear weapons. In the article I posted links to two books, destroying your claim that I only post videos.
What we fail to realize is that we are all misled.
The State of California Cartels are destroying my family using all branches of my government while you jerk-off in a box !
Tell me again why I want you to be alive when you cannot come to the aid of your own people being destroyed by open extermination using hospitals and Courts and thousands of armed agents?
Looks like divide and conquer won. And I conceded this fact.
I won't serve to protect this living hell invaded by forty-million assassins.
So regarding your fuckin jerk-off session.
Whatever size BOMB exists.
If I am granted a big bomb.
I would drop it on your fuckin head. I hate this fuckin Countries people.
I hate you with a passion. That has been burning for a Century.
You let the cartels seize my agencies, institutions, and destroy my life forty-five years in-a-row while arguing to no one about nothing.
You are a pathetic loser. A stay at home arm chair pilot.
I add you to my to list. Kenneth Hinnenkamp. You are a useless eater whether you know it or not.
Which government agency did you work for! You communist piece of shit.
Or did you collect SSI. Disability and State contracts that bankrupt the Nation?
You are a piece of shit just as the idiot you are arguing with.
Both useless eaters set-up to die bitching about nothing to no one.
You only have to protect the ten percent of us who would defend you.
The few, the proud.
But you cannot even do that with free communist care and money!
Care & $ denied to me MY WHOLE life!
Thought crimes and censorship and draconian Court cases for petty crimes!
Because I guarded your worthless fuckin life! And your rights, and your kids like they were my own.
Too late to save you Kenneth.
Your enemies are all around you. You are your own worst enemy. You need to stay in your easy chair and shut the fuck-up and Wait to die like the 90% of Americans proven to do only that!!!!
They are real Kenneth. Don't lose your mind with your conspiratorial thinking. You might be right on most, but this one you are way out on a limb that can't support you. The bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki did not detonate on the ground. They were aerial bursts. Much of the radioactive material dispersed. Plus those bombs had minimal amounts of Uranium that underwent nuclear fission. Yet, there were still many deaths attributed to radiation exposure. However, what remained on the ground had decayed significantly over time. Today, levels that are officially seen as harmful, can actually be health beneficial. Look up radiation hormesis. Also, the nukes of today are much more efficient and sophisticated.
Quackery. I think that was a Rockefeller term to describe natural medicine instead of the competing oil based synthetic molecules that can be patented for obscene profits.
Nope, it's a term used long before that. And no there is no law forbidding Rockefellers from using terms that really describe themselves, on others. There is a word for that, it's called Projection.
Virology is a lie, climate change is a lie, the moon landings were a lie, the Holocaust was l lie. I put nuclear weapons in the same category. Prove me wrong with forensic evidence.
Testing was stopped in the early 90’s. There are multiple videos available to the public on nuclear testing. Go to Albuquerque and spend some time in the nuclear museum there. I did not say all of your conspiratorial thinking was wrong. You misread my comment.
I performed a search on yandex.ru, the least censored search engine I know of. I am not seeing any film of nuclear tests performed after the 1960s. I believe those were faked. It was claimed the tests ceased in the 1990s. But there are no videos of the more recent "claimed" tests to be found.
I choose not to live in fear of a nuclear war. Not much we can do about nukes anyway is there. I think everyone taking the position they don't exist is healthier for society.
You're not going to find videos of testing that went underground. Most are classified anyway. Again, go check out the Nuclear Museum in Albuquerque. Also check out the Museum at Los Alamos. Just because you did an internet search for this and couldn't find convincing evidence does not mean you are correct in your assessment.
I found a video that clearly demonstrates the tests we did see were faked. Just like the moon landings.
Death Object and Hiroshima Revisited are two books that provide evidence there were no nukes dropped in Japan.
If no nukes were dropped in Japan, and the tests were faked, how likely is it that they really exist?
I have been to three Holocaust museums, St. Petersburg, D.C., and Auschwitz. I know for a fact that the Holocaust never happened. So much for museums. They don't prove anything but that the public is gullible.
Really?!? Healthier, to just sit back, relax, have a cool one, and let the MONSTERS create WW3 and kill billions, including yourself and your family. How do you figure that's healthier?
My understanding is nuclear weapons require maintenance. How would we know if the maintenance is effective without continued testing? Simple logic.
Museums are suspect. There are lots of Holocaust museums to convince the public that the Holocaust was a real event. I assure you it was not. Eyewitness testimony is not credible without forensics to back it up. But most of the population is unaware that museums are not forensic evidence.
We know the Smithsonian hides evidence of history like the former existence of giants.
Actually you only need make your enemies believe your weapons are real and effective.
They have sophisticated NDT (non-destructive testing), computer modeling and controlled implosion testing to validate their weapons without a full detonation. LIF is one device used for that purpose.
If that's so, you should be able to argue your position. Tell us how it debunks all the vast evidence supporting nuclear weapons. Debunk the nuclear chain reaction. Debunk Trumps Golden Dome. Debunk the Iran 60% enrichment. Debunk radiation injuries and deaths. In your own words.
Vast evidence? Surely you jest. Or it could be you are being paid to defend the fear narrative.
There is no residual radiation in Hiroshima or Nagasaki. Both cities were rebuilt on a similar timeline to Tokyo, Berlin, and Dresden. All you have to do is use your brain.
Weapons of mass destruction were not found in Iraq. Yet we were led to believe they existed and went to war. Who benefited? Israel and the MIC. No US citizens benefited. It is better to not believe in nukes. Live your life without fear. It is much healthier.
That has ZERO to do with the existence of WMDs. What, are you saying chemical weapons and biological weapons also don't exist? Obviously to EVERYBODY except you, they faked the WMDs so they could start their Banker Wars, "seven countries in five years".
Depleted uranium weaponry is very dangerous, as small radioactive particles get inhaled and lodge in the body. There are cities in Iraq where people are afraid to have babies as they come out deformed, and cancer is through the roof. Yugoslavia, Ukraine, Iran, and all of the targets of the zionist entity are contaminated for the long term by this.
Many people who were involved in the anti nuke movements of the 60´s now see it as an organized hysteria; a psyop. Fear is the mind killer.
Yes, depleted uranium is dangerous. No doubt about that.
The warmongers don't care about civilian populations. The fire bombing campaigns in Japan and Germany are evidence of that. Only Germany respected the Geneva Convention that the US and UK also signed on to.
The bankers (I.e.globalists, warmongers) don’t give a damn how many people die during wars & they instigate these wars through false flags to get them started & get people behind them (the ole’ weapons of mass destruction lie Bush jr told about Iraq). The absolute ONLY thing they care about is making money off these wars & I wouldn’t be surprised if reducing the population was another goal. They are the epitome of evil.
There is a lot to be commented on to this outstandingly optimistic report from Celia, which I plan on doing later. Let me first address this comment by Kenneth:
Many years ago I read a report by a (Danish?) scientist, proposing scientific arguments that nuclear weapons are not working and cannot work. Thank you, Kenneth, for confirming this theory, which has always left doubts in my mind. My openness to listening to such heretical ideas stems from the post-Kennedy moon landings having been faked and other faked historical "facts" about certain "institutionalized death" camps, which, at the end of the day, produced a majority of "survivors" for the "guided" populating of a planned State that nobody would have otherwise wanted to "populate" of their own free will. Our Pleiadean protectors are alleged to have also been quite outspoken about the fact that nuclear weapons would, if necessary, be made inoperable by them in case of attempted use, even before being readied. Let us hope that the same theory has validity for the "Samson-Option", which is a present danger, under certain conditions of a cornered beast.
Yeah, explain how nuclear fission doesn't work. Where those Terawatts of energy come from? Nuclear bombs are just nuclear fission that goes prompt critical, the chain reaction increases at an exponential rate. Pretty basic physics. You don't need an Einstein to explain it.
So sad I missed the Zoom. I went to an outdoor concert to hear live music played by a very talented and upbeat blues guitar player, Keb Mo. I highly recommend his music!
Hi Celia, Thank you for this post and I'm glad you are getting back into podcasting! I was on a lot of the call yesterday. Please let me know if you have heard anything further about the Israeli whistleblower who in the Kinesset admitted to an order even before the Oct 7th attack started to stand down. I know that Jimmy Dore covered this but I haven't seen it anywhere except for your coverage and Jimmy Dore coverage. It is such an important story but I don't see it covered anywhere else. Your thoughts? THANK YOU!!!
"I find in existence a new and dangerous concept that the men of our armed forces owe primary allegiance and loyalty to those who temporarily exercise the authority of the executive branch of Government, rather than to the Country and its Constitution, which they are sworn to defend."
Short answer: Anyone who believes nuclear weapons don't exist is a crackpot or nutcase or both. I can't be kind about that. It endangers the lives of all of us. Stop it!!!
?!? Obviously, the CIA/NATO/EUSSR can wage their proxy war against Russia with reckless abandon if everyone believes there are no nuclear weapons. Even bomb the Kremlin. What the hell. Go for the gusto.
You never hear of the nuclear deterrent? Mutually Assured Destruction = MAD. Which has kept us from WW3 so far.
You grifters/CIA Toadies are telling us "don't worry" there are no nuclear weapons. Putting billions of lives at risk.
Just How Likely Is A Global Nuclear War? - Annie Jacobsen, Chris Williamson:
"Thus the Drug Trust, while maintaining the Stalinist Communist Government in Russia, simultaneously maintained a Communist back up regime in the United States, the Trotskyite Movement, in case the Stalinist regime should fall."
So sad I missed the Zoom. I would have definitely popped on, but I didn’t see the email until late last night.
I went to an outdoor concert to hear live music played by a very talented and upbeat blues guitar player, Keb’ Mo’. I highly recommend his music! It was two hours of fun, and a rockin’ good time.
So all you gals (and guys) take a listen and take a twirl around your living room!
Celia, Good day to you. Thank you for this post. Your mind is amazing. To put this together after the 3hr Zoom on Friday, which I attended; it was a great gathering of so many people with so much knowledge to offer. One person in particular--Peter Shanteli-- who spoke a prayer of confirmation for us all to commit ourselves to the protection of no other than the Creator. I hope to see it written out so I can memorize it.
I hope my comment gets through. I tried to like someone's comment and the screen kept going blank. Usually get a message from Substack to sign in from a new email.
If you think the prior docs I listed are one offs, here is another to put your minds to rest. Nukes likely don't exist, therefore no reason to live in fear of them.
Beware of the CIA disinformation sockpuppets who are promoting this "No Such Thing as Nuclear Bombs" crap. A psyop to stop an anti-war movement as happened in the 60's over the legitimate fear of nuclear annihilation. Take note that experts on the subject regard this proxy war with Russia in Ukraine as having pushed us closer to nuclear war than even the former peak of the Cuban Missile Crisis.
Of course you would have to be a complete imbecile to believe there are no nuclear weapons. Just look at the hundreds if not thousands of videos of nuclear bomb tests:
And GROK outlines how overwhelming the evidence for nuclear weapons is:
The existence of nuclear weapons and their use in Japan during World War II is supported by extensive historical, scientific, and documentary evidence. Here's a concise overview:
Evidence of Nuclear Weapons' Existence
Scientific Development (Manhattan Project):
The Manhattan Project (1942–1945) was a U.S.-led research program to develop nuclear weapons. Declassified documents, including reports from Los Alamos National Laboratory, detail the physics of nuclear fission, bomb design (e.g., "Little Boy" and "Fat Man"), and successful test at Trinity site (July 16, 1945, Alamogordo, New Mexico).
Key figures like J. Robert Oppenheimer, Enrico Fermi, and others published papers (post-war) on nuclear physics, corroborated by peer-reviewed scientific literature.
Trinity Test:
The first nuclear explosion at Trinity produced a yield of ~20 kilotons of TNT, documented by photographs, seismic data, and radiation measurements. Eyewitness accounts from scientists and military personnel, along with physical evidence like trinitite (fused glass from the blast), confirm the event.
Declassified Government Records:
U.S. National Archives and the Atomic Heritage Foundation contain declassified reports, memos, and correspondence (e.g., Einstein-Szilard letter to Roosevelt, 1939) outlining nuclear weapon development.
The Smyth Report (1945) publicly detailed the Manhattan Project’s work.
Global Nuclear Arsenals:
Post-WWII nuclear tests by the U.S., Soviet Union, and others (e.g., Operation Crossroads, 1946) are documented with video footage, radiation data, and international monitoring. Modern nuclear arsenals are verified by treaties like START, with inspections by organizations like the IAEA.
Evidence of Use in Japan (Hiroshima and Nagasaki, 1945)
Historical Records:
Official U.S. military reports, including those from the 509th Composite Group, document the deployment of "Little Boy" (uranium bomb) on Hiroshima (August 6, 1945) and "Fat Man" (plutonium bomb) on Nagasaki (August 9, 1945).
Japanese government archives, survivor testimonies (hibakusha), and post-war investigations (e.g., U.S. Strategic Bombing Survey) confirm the bombings.
Physical Evidence:
Hiroshima: The Aioi Bridge, near the hypocenter, shows structural damage consistent with a nuclear blast. The Hiroshima Peace Memorial Museum preserves artifacts like melted glass, charred clothing, and photographs of the aftermath.
Nagasaki: Similar physical evidence, including damaged structures like the Urakami Cathedral, aligns with a nuclear explosion.
Blast Effects: Both cities exhibited unique damage patterns (e.g., flash burns, radial destruction, and shadow imprints) consistent with nuclear detonations, not conventional explosives.
Medical and Scientific Evidence:
Survivors displayed acute radiation syndrome (ARS), with symptoms like burns, hair loss, and internal organ damage, documented by Japanese and U.S. medical teams. Long-term effects, like increased cancer rates (e.g., leukemia), were tracked by the Radiation Effects Research Foundation (RERF).
Soil and material samples from both cities show residual radioactivity (e.g., cesium-137, strontium-90), consistent with nuclear fission.
Eyewitness Accounts:
Thousands of survivors (hibakusha) provided consistent accounts of a blinding flash, intense heat, and massive explosion. For example, Setsuko Thurlow’s testimony describes the Hiroshima blast’s immediate effects.
U.S. aircrew (e.g., Enola Gay pilot Paul Tibbets) reported the detonation and observed the mushroom cloud.
Photographic and Video Evidence:
Aerial and ground photographs from Hiroshima and Nagasaki show widespread destruction, with epicenters of near-total annihilation. Films from U.S. and Japanese sources, including post-bombing surveys, corroborate the scale and nature of the damage.
International Confirmation:
Post-war investigations by Allied forces, neutral scientists, and the United Nations confirmed the use of nuclear weapons. Japan’s surrender on August 15, 1945, explicitly referenced the bombs’ devastating power.
Estimated Impact
Hiroshima: ~80,000 immediate deaths, with total casualties (including later deaths from radiation) estimated at 90,000–140,000.
Nagasaki: ~40,000 immediate deaths, with total casualties ~60,000–80,000.
Data comes from RERF, Japanese government records, and U.S. military estimates.
Countering Skepticism
Some fringe theories question the existence of nuclear weapons or their use in Japan, often citing conspiracies or claiming the bombings were staged. These are refuted by:
The overwhelming volume of primary sources (documents, photos, artifacts).
Consistency of physical, medical, and eyewitness evidence.
Independent verification by multiple nations and scientific communities.
Modern nuclear physics, which underpins ongoing nuclear programs and is testable in controlled settings
If you still have a TV in 2025, you are a part of the problem.
I could say the same thing about people who still buy newspapers, even though I have a monthly subscription to one because my wife likes to read it at breakfast and do the crossword, and we can use it to wrap up the used cat litter, make origami items, or lay it on the floor to catch the paint splashes when decorating.
As far as I can see, TV has no such redeeming qualities.
A lot of Truth & wisdom in your post. Today most of the Western world is lead by self centered, self dealing war mongers because that’s where their greedy profit lies. Their loyalty & patriotism begins & ends at their wallet
And I saw a propagandist headline yesterday mentioning that protesters were gathering in Alaska against the upcoming meeting. Oh my goodness! I grew up in an era where we used to protest AGAINST the brutal wars because we hoped for peace. Now the Soros funded gangs show up IN FAVOR of the war and the normies cheer. The world has literally turned ass backwards!!
Idiots
Many of us have known what's behind the Ukraine/Russia conflict for three years. The early propaganda supporting Ukraine was sickening, all the Ukraine flag emojis and the Russia hate. All because of the public's ignorance of history, even recent history, and the public's willingness to believe what the government and media tell them.
It is so obvious that Zelensky is a puppet of the globalist cult, installed by the Maidan revolution orchestrated by the Obama admin in 2014, and supported by the EU Russia-haters and war mongers.
It is Zelensky and the EU and the deep state who do NOT want a peace deal. They are still angry that they lost control of their bio weapons labs, their human trafficking operations and their money laundering machine in Ukraine. It is THEY who are responsible for the deaths of so many innocent Ukraine citizens caught up in this conflict.
Thank you!!! I am so sick of everyone making out like Russia & Putin are the ones who started all this. Zelensky is nothing but a cocaine addicted, child & organ trafficking former actor/dancer who is nothing but a puppet. Every time a peace deal is announced he is the one who breaks it & flies drones or attacks Russia in some manner yet all the ridiculous NATO countries treat him like he is some kind of hero. It is really pathetic. Putin went in to destroy the bioweapons labs we (Obama/Biden) set up in Ukraine & stop the adrenochrome & organ harvesting. The one thing Putin asked was not to let Ukraine join NATO & yet they have not only floated that idea but we have military troops in countries surrounding Russia’s borders. How would we react if Russia had troops on our borders?
You nailed it 👊
EGG-ZAC-LY
I seriously doubt whether nuclear weapons exist. Hiroshima and Nagasaki are thriving cities today, just like the the rest of the firebombed cities in Japan and Germany. How is this possible if nuclear weapons reduce cities to radioactive wastelands like we were told? Why was there no detectable differences between bombed out cities like Hiroshima, Tokyo and Dresden?
Michael Palmer visited Hiroshima after the war to see for himself the damage and the effects of nuclear weapons.
There is no doubt that the early weapons testing program was filmed by Hollywood. Looking at them now we can see that the test videos are phony.
Michael Palmer wrote a book about his investigations titled Hiroshima Revisited.
https://archive.org/details/Hiroshima_revisited
Who said nuclear weapons reduce cities to radioactive wastelands? You have contamination with radioisotopes, that like any contamination can be cleaned up by various means. It just takes time & money. But those were small weapons, ~10kt, modern weapons are 400kt up to 2,000kt. Radioisotope contamination increases proportionately. And you have to have a place to live while the long & expensive and resource & manpower contamination is done. Where you gonna go if all your cities are destroyed?
Hollywood, my ass. There were hundreds of tests done by a half dozen different countries and many, many videos exist of the same. Including citizen videos & witnesses of explosions in Nevada, visible in nearby cities.
Michael Palmer is likely just another CIA disinformation toadie.
CIA: "don't worry serfs, we won't kill you all with our endless wars, no siree, bob, because, because -- there are no nuclear weapons, relax, don't worry, we're the CIA, we're here to keep you safe".
I am 73. I lived through the Cuban Missel Crisis and all the propaganda of the time. It was drummed into us of the dangers of nuclear weapons and what happens after they are used. We were told of radioactivity and the half life of radioactive nuclear materials.
I was in a field artillery unit in Germany. We supposedly had nuclear rounds for our 8" Howitzers. It was all very secretive and the knowledge of them was compartmentalized. It all seemed fake to me. And considering the state of our self propelled artillery at the time, I doubt the quality of the equipment or the troops to operate them.
Of course anything can be contested by labeling it a CIA psyop. Very convenient. I don't buy it, but obviously you do. Some are easily deceived. "By way deception thou shalt do war." -Mossad motto. You know Jews are responsible for most, if not all of the wars, right?
If nuclear weapons really exist, why hasn't someone used them yet? It is obvious that Hiroshima and Nagasaki were faked.
Remember we said that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction. None were found. All a bullshit excuse to go to war.
Iran has stated they are not seeking nuclear weapons. Could they realize they don't exist and choose not to spend the money developing them? I think the whole thing is another CIA psyop.
If you have film of actual nuclear tests, please provide links. Don't send the obviously faked Bikini Atoll or Nevada desert films. If I and the authors can be proven wrong, I will accept the evidence if it exists. I believe in forensics. I don't believe in phony testimony not backed by forensics. Think the Holocaust myth. No forensics, but lots of phony testimony.
There are plenty of destructive weapons. Nukes, especially hydrogen bombs are only intended to be used illegally against civilian populations. They are a method to keep populations in fear. I choose not to fear them. There, I feel better now.
I'll let GROK explain it to you:
The existence of nuclear weapons and their use in Japan during World War II is supported by extensive historical, scientific, and documentary evidence. Here's a concise overview:
Evidence of Nuclear Weapons' Existence
Scientific Development (Manhattan Project):
The Manhattan Project (1942–1945) was a U.S.-led research program to develop nuclear weapons. Declassified documents, including reports from Los Alamos National Laboratory, detail the physics of nuclear fission, bomb design (e.g., "Little Boy" and "Fat Man"), and successful test at Trinity site (July 16, 1945, Alamogordo, New Mexico).
Key figures like J. Robert Oppenheimer, Enrico Fermi, and others published papers (post-war) on nuclear physics, corroborated by peer-reviewed scientific literature.
Trinity Test:
The first nuclear explosion at Trinity produced a yield of ~20 kilotons of TNT, documented by photographs, seismic data, and radiation measurements. Eyewitness accounts from scientists and military personnel, along with physical evidence like trinitite (fused glass from the blast), confirm the event.
Declassified Government Records:
U.S. National Archives and the Atomic Heritage Foundation contain declassified reports, memos, and correspondence (e.g., Einstein-Szilard letter to Roosevelt, 1939) outlining nuclear weapon development.
The Smyth Report (1945) publicly detailed the Manhattan Project’s work.
Global Nuclear Arsenals:
Post-WWII nuclear tests by the U.S., Soviet Union, and others (e.g., Operation Crossroads, 1946) are documented with video footage, radiation data, and international monitoring. Modern nuclear arsenals are verified by treaties like START, with inspections by organizations like the IAEA.
Evidence of Use in Japan (Hiroshima and Nagasaki, 1945)
Historical Records:
Official U.S. military reports, including those from the 509th Composite Group, document the deployment of "Little Boy" (uranium bomb) on Hiroshima (August 6, 1945) and "Fat Man" (plutonium bomb) on Nagasaki (August 9, 1945).
Japanese government archives, survivor testimonies (hibakusha), and post-war investigations (e.g., U.S. Strategic Bombing Survey) confirm the bombings.
Physical Evidence:
Hiroshima: The Aioi Bridge, near the hypocenter, shows structural damage consistent with a nuclear blast. The Hiroshima Peace Memorial Museum preserves artifacts like melted glass, charred clothing, and photographs of the aftermath.
Nagasaki: Similar physical evidence, including damaged structures like the Urakami Cathedral, aligns with a nuclear explosion.
Blast Effects: Both cities exhibited unique damage patterns (e.g., flash burns, radial destruction, and shadow imprints) consistent with nuclear detonations, not conventional explosives.
Medical and Scientific Evidence:
Survivors displayed acute radiation syndrome (ARS), with symptoms like burns, hair loss, and internal organ damage, documented by Japanese and U.S. medical teams. Long-term effects, like increased cancer rates (e.g., leukemia), were tracked by the Radiation Effects Research Foundation (RERF).
Soil and material samples from both cities show residual radioactivity (e.g., cesium-137, strontium-90), consistent with nuclear fission.
Eyewitness Accounts:
Thousands of survivors (hibakusha) provided consistent accounts of a blinding flash, intense heat, and massive explosion. For example, Setsuko Thurlow’s testimony describes the Hiroshima blast’s immediate effects.
U.S. aircrew (e.g., Enola Gay pilot Paul Tibbets) reported the detonation and observed the mushroom cloud.
Photographic and Video Evidence:
Aerial and ground photographs from Hiroshima and Nagasaki show widespread destruction, with epicenters of near-total annihilation. Films from U.S. and Japanese sources, including post-bombing surveys, corroborate the scale and nature of the damage.
International Confirmation:
Post-war investigations by Allied forces, neutral scientists, and the United Nations confirmed the use of nuclear weapons. Japan’s surrender on August 15, 1945, explicitly referenced the bombs’ devastating power.
Estimated Impact
Hiroshima: ~80,000 immediate deaths, with total casualties (including later deaths from radiation) estimated at 90,000–140,000.
Nagasaki: ~40,000 immediate deaths, with total casualties ~60,000–80,000.
Data comes from RERF, Japanese government records, and U.S. military estimates.
Countering Skepticism
Some fringe theories question the existence of nuclear weapons or their use in Japan, often citing conspiracies or claiming the bombings were staged. These are refuted by:
The overwhelming volume of primary sources (documents, photos, artifacts).
Consistency of physical, medical, and eyewitness evidence.
Independent verification by multiple nations and scientific communities.
Modern nuclear physics, which underpins ongoing nuclear programs and is testable in controlled settings
Faked testing for produce fear.
https://odysee.com/@montysthinkingoutsidethebox:2/Edmund-Matthews---Nuclear-Weapons-Do-Not-Exist:3?r=94HpiQBrLHoNMQWdhzvJmuWUmdqyeZFE&lid=favorites
The guy is either a moron, a grifter or a paid CIA disinformation toadie. Pick one.
Just because you can find some arsehole making a video doesn't make for truth. Find even one Nuclear Physicist who makes those insane claims.
Iran is going to all that immense expense of enriching Uranium to 60% just for fun. Yep.
Trump wants to spend $trillions on a missile defense shield for the USA, just for fun, also. And that's not the first time, Ronald Reagan had a SDI (Strategic Defense Initiative) plan as well, more $trillions.
I read books too. Have you read Hiroshima Revisited? No, I am sure you are not familiar with the evidence against nuclear weapons.
There is no such evidence. As I linked, vast amounts of evidence they do exist, along with basic physics.
Quit spreading CIA propaganda. Are they paying you?
There is no evidence that nuclear weapons were dropped on Hiroshima or Nagasaki. They were illegally firebombed just like the dozens of cities in Germany and others in Japan. You have been captured by the cult of believers in bullshit. Some people can't be helped.
Basic physics? Who practices the scientific method? https://www.bitchute.com/video/YBo7qr5r4zej
CIA propaganda is that nukes exist. It is a psyop, just like the moon landings and virology.
If you disagree, take your vaccine and call the undertaker in the morning.
https://open.substack.com/pub/kenkrypto/p/nuclear-fears?r=4qa41&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&showWelcomeOnShare=false
You are denying Nuclear Energy? What do you think a nuclear reactor is? How does it work? Immense energy from a tiny amount of fuel. You know what a chain reaction is? Nuclear fission? It's pretty simple minded when you know basic physics. It's not rocket science.
A critical mass of U235 or Pu239 and the chain reaction increases exponentially in a matter of milliseconds, releasing immense energy. Basic physics.
Even in early experiments scientists put too much plutonium together, creating a critical mass which then exploded, killing them. Look up "The Demon Core". Happened in Russia also.
Apparently you can't read. I never denied nuclear energy, only nuclear weapons. In the article I posted links to two books, destroying your claim that I only post videos.
I am going to have to block you. I cannot deal with sub-K9 intellect.
What we fail to realize is that we are all misled.
The State of California Cartels are destroying my family using all branches of my government while you jerk-off in a box !
Tell me again why I want you to be alive when you cannot come to the aid of your own people being destroyed by open extermination using hospitals and Courts and thousands of armed agents?
Looks like divide and conquer won. And I conceded this fact.
I won't serve to protect this living hell invaded by forty-million assassins.
So regarding your fuckin jerk-off session.
Whatever size BOMB exists.
If I am granted a big bomb.
I would drop it on your fuckin head. I hate this fuckin Countries people.
I hate you with a passion. That has been burning for a Century.
You let the cartels seize my agencies, institutions, and destroy my life forty-five years in-a-row while arguing to no one about nothing.
You are a pathetic loser. A stay at home arm chair pilot.
I add you to my to list. Kenneth Hinnenkamp. You are a useless eater whether you know it or not.
Which government agency did you work for! You communist piece of shit.
Or did you collect SSI. Disability and State contracts that bankrupt the Nation?
You are a piece of shit just as the idiot you are arguing with.
Both useless eaters set-up to die bitching about nothing to no one.
You only have to protect the ten percent of us who would defend you.
The few, the proud.
But you cannot even do that with free communist care and money!
Care & $ denied to me MY WHOLE life!
Thought crimes and censorship and draconian Court cases for petty crimes!
Because I guarded your worthless fuckin life! And your rights, and your kids like they were my own.
Too late to save you Kenneth.
Your enemies are all around you. You are your own worst enemy. You need to stay in your easy chair and shut the fuck-up and Wait to die like the 90% of Americans proven to do only that!!!!
https://open.substack.com/pub/kenkrypto/p/nuclear-fears?r=4qa41&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&showWelcomeOnShare=false
They are real Kenneth. Don't lose your mind with your conspiratorial thinking. You might be right on most, but this one you are way out on a limb that can't support you. The bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki did not detonate on the ground. They were aerial bursts. Much of the radioactive material dispersed. Plus those bombs had minimal amounts of Uranium that underwent nuclear fission. Yet, there were still many deaths attributed to radiation exposure. However, what remained on the ground had decayed significantly over time. Today, levels that are officially seen as harmful, can actually be health beneficial. Look up radiation hormesis. Also, the nukes of today are much more efficient and sophisticated.
Labeling something conspiratorial is a convenient cop out.
In this case it's a whole lot more like quackery.
Quackery. I think that was a Rockefeller term to describe natural medicine instead of the competing oil based synthetic molecules that can be patented for obscene profits.
Nope, it's a term used long before that. And no there is no law forbidding Rockefellers from using terms that really describe themselves, on others. There is a word for that, it's called Projection.
Virology is a lie, climate change is a lie, the moon landings were a lie, the Holocaust was l lie. I put nuclear weapons in the same category. Prove me wrong with forensic evidence.
Keep trying, one day you might get even one thing right.
I get it. You are clueless like the vast majority of the most of society. You actually seem like the rest of the cult members I come across.
Please show evidence for your claims. Do you have videos to show of recent nuclear tests?
Testing was stopped in the early 90’s. There are multiple videos available to the public on nuclear testing. Go to Albuquerque and spend some time in the nuclear museum there. I did not say all of your conspiratorial thinking was wrong. You misread my comment.
I performed a search on yandex.ru, the least censored search engine I know of. I am not seeing any film of nuclear tests performed after the 1960s. I believe those were faked. It was claimed the tests ceased in the 1990s. But there are no videos of the more recent "claimed" tests to be found.
I choose not to live in fear of a nuclear war. Not much we can do about nukes anyway is there. I think everyone taking the position they don't exist is healthier for society.
You're not going to find videos of testing that went underground. Most are classified anyway. Again, go check out the Nuclear Museum in Albuquerque. Also check out the Museum at Los Alamos. Just because you did an internet search for this and couldn't find convincing evidence does not mean you are correct in your assessment.
I found a video that clearly demonstrates the tests we did see were faked. Just like the moon landings.
Death Object and Hiroshima Revisited are two books that provide evidence there were no nukes dropped in Japan.
If no nukes were dropped in Japan, and the tests were faked, how likely is it that they really exist?
I have been to three Holocaust museums, St. Petersburg, D.C., and Auschwitz. I know for a fact that the Holocaust never happened. So much for museums. They don't prove anything but that the public is gullible.
Really?!? Healthier, to just sit back, relax, have a cool one, and let the MONSTERS create WW3 and kill billions, including yourself and your family. How do you figure that's healthier?
You are a danger to society.
How does belief in nukes prevent WWIII?
My understanding is nuclear weapons require maintenance. How would we know if the maintenance is effective without continued testing? Simple logic.
Museums are suspect. There are lots of Holocaust museums to convince the public that the Holocaust was a real event. I assure you it was not. Eyewitness testimony is not credible without forensics to back it up. But most of the population is unaware that museums are not forensic evidence.
We know the Smithsonian hides evidence of history like the former existence of giants.
Actually you only need make your enemies believe your weapons are real and effective.
They have sophisticated NDT (non-destructive testing), computer modeling and controlled implosion testing to validate their weapons without a full detonation. LIF is one device used for that purpose.
https://archive.org/details/8d-0de-2
Try:
https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=nuclear+bomb+tests
I tried scrolling to the bottom but it kept loading, bottomless. But you go girl, knock yourself out. Then tell us how many videos you find.
I am familiar with the “official” bullshit. This film debunks all that.
https://archive.org/details/BitChute-ZZoHhowAcq9I
If that's so, you should be able to argue your position. Tell us how it debunks all the vast evidence supporting nuclear weapons. Debunk the nuclear chain reaction. Debunk Trumps Golden Dome. Debunk the Iran 60% enrichment. Debunk radiation injuries and deaths. In your own words.
Vast evidence? Surely you jest. Or it could be you are being paid to defend the fear narrative.
There is no residual radiation in Hiroshima or Nagasaki. Both cities were rebuilt on a similar timeline to Tokyo, Berlin, and Dresden. All you have to do is use your brain.
But thinking is not your strong suit is it?
https://substack.com/profile/7944625-kenneth-j-hinnenkamp/note/c-146068935?r=4qa41
Weapons of mass destruction were not found in Iraq. Yet we were led to believe they existed and went to war. Who benefited? Israel and the MIC. No US citizens benefited. It is better to not believe in nukes. Live your life without fear. It is much healthier.
That has ZERO to do with the existence of WMDs. What, are you saying chemical weapons and biological weapons also don't exist? Obviously to EVERYBODY except you, they faked the WMDs so they could start their Banker Wars, "seven countries in five years".
Depleted uranium weaponry is very dangerous, as small radioactive particles get inhaled and lodge in the body. There are cities in Iraq where people are afraid to have babies as they come out deformed, and cancer is through the roof. Yugoslavia, Ukraine, Iran, and all of the targets of the zionist entity are contaminated for the long term by this.
Many people who were involved in the anti nuke movements of the 60´s now see it as an organized hysteria; a psyop. Fear is the mind killer.
Yes, depleted uranium is dangerous. No doubt about that.
The warmongers don't care about civilian populations. The fire bombing campaigns in Japan and Germany are evidence of that. Only Germany respected the Geneva Convention that the US and UK also signed on to.
The bankers (I.e.globalists, warmongers) don’t give a damn how many people die during wars & they instigate these wars through false flags to get them started & get people behind them (the ole’ weapons of mass destruction lie Bush jr told about Iraq). The absolute ONLY thing they care about is making money off these wars & I wouldn’t be surprised if reducing the population was another goal. They are the epitome of evil.
There is a lot to be commented on to this outstandingly optimistic report from Celia, which I plan on doing later. Let me first address this comment by Kenneth:
Many years ago I read a report by a (Danish?) scientist, proposing scientific arguments that nuclear weapons are not working and cannot work. Thank you, Kenneth, for confirming this theory, which has always left doubts in my mind. My openness to listening to such heretical ideas stems from the post-Kennedy moon landings having been faked and other faked historical "facts" about certain "institutionalized death" camps, which, at the end of the day, produced a majority of "survivors" for the "guided" populating of a planned State that nobody would have otherwise wanted to "populate" of their own free will. Our Pleiadean protectors are alleged to have also been quite outspoken about the fact that nuclear weapons would, if necessary, be made inoperable by them in case of attempted use, even before being readied. Let us hope that the same theory has validity for the "Samson-Option", which is a present danger, under certain conditions of a cornered beast.
Yeah, explain how nuclear fission doesn't work. Where those Terawatts of energy come from? Nuclear bombs are just nuclear fission that goes prompt critical, the chain reaction increases at an exponential rate. Pretty basic physics. You don't need an Einstein to explain it.
I feel shame when I realize how lightly most people take war.
Every piece of propaganda is eaten up with such gluttony by the multitudes.
It’s easy for them when they live in a country where they’ve never had to experience an actual war.
Good morning. You're up early Celia. Thanks for staying up so late with the "zoomers". Interesting discussion last night.
Ok, now I'll go back and re-read this article.
So sad I missed the Zoom. I went to an outdoor concert to hear live music played by a very talented and upbeat blues guitar player, Keb Mo. I highly recommend his music!
Your evening sounds wonderful. Love live music. Thanks for the recommendation. I'll check him out.
There is talk Celia might host another zoom next Friday.
Glad you had a fun experience (there seem to be so few of those). Don't worry, there will be ongoing Friday Zooms.
Hi Celia, Thank you for this post and I'm glad you are getting back into podcasting! I was on a lot of the call yesterday. Please let me know if you have heard anything further about the Israeli whistleblower who in the Kinesset admitted to an order even before the Oct 7th attack started to stand down. I know that Jimmy Dore covered this but I haven't seen it anywhere except for your coverage and Jimmy Dore coverage. It is such an important story but I don't see it covered anywhere else. Your thoughts? THANK YOU!!!
No doubt about it. Another 9/11 fable to justify wars of aggression.
"I find in existence a new and dangerous concept that the men of our armed forces owe primary allegiance and loyalty to those who temporarily exercise the authority of the executive branch of Government, rather than to the Country and its Constitution, which they are sworn to defend."
General MacArthur
Massachusetts Legislature, 1951
The Bikini Atoll nuclear tests were faked. https://archive.org/details/bikini_202411
Short answer: Anyone who believes nuclear weapons don't exist is a crackpot or nutcase or both. I can't be kind about that. It endangers the lives of all of us. Stop it!!!
How does it endanger lives to not believe? Please explain.
Don't be kind, just give your honest opinion.
?!? Obviously, the CIA/NATO/EUSSR can wage their proxy war against Russia with reckless abandon if everyone believes there are no nuclear weapons. Even bomb the Kremlin. What the hell. Go for the gusto.
You never hear of the nuclear deterrent? Mutually Assured Destruction = MAD. Which has kept us from WW3 so far.
You grifters/CIA Toadies are telling us "don't worry" there are no nuclear weapons. Putting billions of lives at risk.
Just How Likely Is A Global Nuclear War? - Annie Jacobsen, Chris Williamson:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8R0PRhc7qvI
Mmmmmm believing in these lies has endangered the lives of all of us......
"Thus the Drug Trust, while maintaining the Stalinist Communist Government in Russia, simultaneously maintained a Communist back up regime in the United States, the Trotskyite Movement, in case the Stalinist regime should fall."
Eustace Mullins
Murder By Injection.
I love Eustace Mullins.
So sad I missed the Zoom. I would have definitely popped on, but I didn’t see the email until late last night.
I went to an outdoor concert to hear live music played by a very talented and upbeat blues guitar player, Keb’ Mo’. I highly recommend his music! It was two hours of fun, and a rockin’ good time.
So all you gals (and guys) take a listen and take a twirl around your living room!
https://youtu.be/kFqOyakrsew?si=QzpxY29-y2tOmQcU
Celia, Good day to you. Thank you for this post. Your mind is amazing. To put this together after the 3hr Zoom on Friday, which I attended; it was a great gathering of so many people with so much knowledge to offer. One person in particular--Peter Shanteli-- who spoke a prayer of confirmation for us all to commit ourselves to the protection of no other than the Creator. I hope to see it written out so I can memorize it.
I hope my comment gets through. I tried to like someone's comment and the screen kept going blank. Usually get a message from Substack to sign in from a new email.
I hope there is sunshine for you in Spain today.
If you think the prior docs I listed are one offs, here is another to put your minds to rest. Nukes likely don't exist, therefore no reason to live in fear of them.
https://archive.org/details/8d-0de-2/mode/2up
What does it matter that the 'Global Media' had a 'Meltdown' ? That sounds rather 'Daily Caller'...
Apologies...I read a lot of MSM, unfortunately, and the reaction-ploy rankles...Bad Day, End Of...
Beware of the CIA disinformation sockpuppets who are promoting this "No Such Thing as Nuclear Bombs" crap. A psyop to stop an anti-war movement as happened in the 60's over the legitimate fear of nuclear annihilation. Take note that experts on the subject regard this proxy war with Russia in Ukraine as having pushed us closer to nuclear war than even the former peak of the Cuban Missile Crisis.
Of course you would have to be a complete imbecile to believe there are no nuclear weapons. Just look at the hundreds if not thousands of videos of nuclear bomb tests:
https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=nuclear+bomb+tests
Imagine how demented someone must be to conclude they are all faked. Type of person who will block anyone from critiquing their juvenile postings.
For an intelligent appraisal of the Nuclear War threat:
Just How Likely Is A Global Nuclear War? - Annie Jacobsen, Chris Williamson:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8R0PRhc7qvI
And GROK outlines how overwhelming the evidence for nuclear weapons is:
The existence of nuclear weapons and their use in Japan during World War II is supported by extensive historical, scientific, and documentary evidence. Here's a concise overview:
Evidence of Nuclear Weapons' Existence
Scientific Development (Manhattan Project):
The Manhattan Project (1942–1945) was a U.S.-led research program to develop nuclear weapons. Declassified documents, including reports from Los Alamos National Laboratory, detail the physics of nuclear fission, bomb design (e.g., "Little Boy" and "Fat Man"), and successful test at Trinity site (July 16, 1945, Alamogordo, New Mexico).
Key figures like J. Robert Oppenheimer, Enrico Fermi, and others published papers (post-war) on nuclear physics, corroborated by peer-reviewed scientific literature.
Trinity Test:
The first nuclear explosion at Trinity produced a yield of ~20 kilotons of TNT, documented by photographs, seismic data, and radiation measurements. Eyewitness accounts from scientists and military personnel, along with physical evidence like trinitite (fused glass from the blast), confirm the event.
Declassified Government Records:
U.S. National Archives and the Atomic Heritage Foundation contain declassified reports, memos, and correspondence (e.g., Einstein-Szilard letter to Roosevelt, 1939) outlining nuclear weapon development.
The Smyth Report (1945) publicly detailed the Manhattan Project’s work.
Global Nuclear Arsenals:
Post-WWII nuclear tests by the U.S., Soviet Union, and others (e.g., Operation Crossroads, 1946) are documented with video footage, radiation data, and international monitoring. Modern nuclear arsenals are verified by treaties like START, with inspections by organizations like the IAEA.
Evidence of Use in Japan (Hiroshima and Nagasaki, 1945)
Historical Records:
Official U.S. military reports, including those from the 509th Composite Group, document the deployment of "Little Boy" (uranium bomb) on Hiroshima (August 6, 1945) and "Fat Man" (plutonium bomb) on Nagasaki (August 9, 1945).
Japanese government archives, survivor testimonies (hibakusha), and post-war investigations (e.g., U.S. Strategic Bombing Survey) confirm the bombings.
Physical Evidence:
Hiroshima: The Aioi Bridge, near the hypocenter, shows structural damage consistent with a nuclear blast. The Hiroshima Peace Memorial Museum preserves artifacts like melted glass, charred clothing, and photographs of the aftermath.
Nagasaki: Similar physical evidence, including damaged structures like the Urakami Cathedral, aligns with a nuclear explosion.
Blast Effects: Both cities exhibited unique damage patterns (e.g., flash burns, radial destruction, and shadow imprints) consistent with nuclear detonations, not conventional explosives.
Medical and Scientific Evidence:
Survivors displayed acute radiation syndrome (ARS), with symptoms like burns, hair loss, and internal organ damage, documented by Japanese and U.S. medical teams. Long-term effects, like increased cancer rates (e.g., leukemia), were tracked by the Radiation Effects Research Foundation (RERF).
Soil and material samples from both cities show residual radioactivity (e.g., cesium-137, strontium-90), consistent with nuclear fission.
Eyewitness Accounts:
Thousands of survivors (hibakusha) provided consistent accounts of a blinding flash, intense heat, and massive explosion. For example, Setsuko Thurlow’s testimony describes the Hiroshima blast’s immediate effects.
U.S. aircrew (e.g., Enola Gay pilot Paul Tibbets) reported the detonation and observed the mushroom cloud.
Photographic and Video Evidence:
Aerial and ground photographs from Hiroshima and Nagasaki show widespread destruction, with epicenters of near-total annihilation. Films from U.S. and Japanese sources, including post-bombing surveys, corroborate the scale and nature of the damage.
International Confirmation:
Post-war investigations by Allied forces, neutral scientists, and the United Nations confirmed the use of nuclear weapons. Japan’s surrender on August 15, 1945, explicitly referenced the bombs’ devastating power.
Estimated Impact
Hiroshima: ~80,000 immediate deaths, with total casualties (including later deaths from radiation) estimated at 90,000–140,000.
Nagasaki: ~40,000 immediate deaths, with total casualties ~60,000–80,000.
Data comes from RERF, Japanese government records, and U.S. military estimates.
Countering Skepticism
Some fringe theories question the existence of nuclear weapons or their use in Japan, often citing conspiracies or claiming the bombings were staged. These are refuted by:
The overwhelming volume of primary sources (documents, photos, artifacts).
Consistency of physical, medical, and eyewitness evidence.
Independent verification by multiple nations and scientific communities.
Modern nuclear physics, which underpins ongoing nuclear programs and is testable in controlled settings
If you still have a TV in 2025, you are a part of the problem.
I could say the same thing about people who still buy newspapers, even though I have a monthly subscription to one because my wife likes to read it at breakfast and do the crossword, and we can use it to wrap up the used cat litter, make origami items, or lay it on the floor to catch the paint splashes when decorating.
As far as I can see, TV has no such redeeming qualities.
Jon Montroll origami ?
A lot of Truth & wisdom in your post. Today most of the Western world is lead by self centered, self dealing war mongers because that’s where their greedy profit lies. Their loyalty & patriotism begins & ends at their wallet