Discover more from The Truth Barrier
Nation Awaits Verdict In Sussman Trial Despite Media Blackout, Barr Calls Hillary Clinton's Role In Conspiracy To Frame Trump In Russiagate "Seditious--"
"The Biggest Criminal Conspiracy In US History"
“Former United States Attorney General Bill Barr has given a stark warning to former Democrat presidential nominee Hillary Clinton over her “seditious” conspiracy against former President Donald Trump.
“I thought we were heading into a constitutional crisis. I think whatever you think of Trump, the fact is that the whole Russiagate thing was a grave injustice. It appears to be a dirty political trick that was used first to hobble him and then potentially to drive him from office,” he said on Glenn Beck’s Blaze TV podcast.
“I believe it is seditious,” he said, but he warned that those charges would be tough to prove in a court.
“It was a gross injustice, and it hurt the United States in many ways, including what we’re seeing in Ukraine these days. It distorted our foreign policy, and so forth,” the former attorney general said. “
Conservative Brief article here.
Very lucid, simple breakdown of what the remarkably brave Kash Patel calls “…the biggest criminal conspiracy in US history,” here:
John Durham’s Wikipedia page contains many interesting details.
XX22 update on the Sussman trial and its place in the bigger picture here.
This NPR piece on the Sussman trial is the journalistic equivalent of a cat pushing a lot of sand around in a cat-box, seeming to never quite feel satisfied. Read it only in order to get a sense of how scared they are. And how pathetic. Who’s legacy hangs in the balance? Durham’s? Not Hillary Clinton or any of the other dirty operatives whose documented actions former US Attorney General William Barr calls “seditious?”
Nice try, lying demons. Your days are done, and America is rising up, and will recover from your gang rape of her soul. You will be in prison, demons. The evidence of a massive criminal, seditious conspiracy and coverup is, to use your favorite word, “overwhelming.”
Last week on the day of Robbie Mook’s explosive testimony, I began this post, but never finished it. The content after this point, therefore, is not current, but it still has value. I share Greenwald’s rage at the abomination known as Franklin Foer. Look at his Twitter feed if you can stand it. What a pod.
Even though the entire world is watching his planted, FALSE story that led to the years of America in Dumpster Fire known as “Russiagate,” (which caused many of us to lose friends, family members, who found our accusations of Hillary Clinton et al specious) what does Foer do?
He fails to mention the trial at all, never mind his role in the destructive mirage. Instead he bows like a Prima Ballerina, pushing the latest Virtue Porn.
(Zelensky, btw, who banned all opposition parties and media in Ukraine at the start of the war, is, to him, the man on earth today who came to “embody democracy.”)
“The Russia-Trump collusion narrative of 2016 and beyond was a dirty trick for the ages, and now we know it came from the top—candidate Hillary Rodham Clinton. That was the testimony Friday by 2016 Clinton campaign manager Robby Mook in federal court, and while this news is hardly a surprise, it’s still bracing to find her fingerprints on the political weapon.”
Wall Street Journal, Editorial Board: Hillary Did It
This below is a FB post our Canadian colleague Paul Bell wrote:
“Donald Trump seems poised to win his $24 Million lawsuit against Hillary Clinton and associates. I wonder if he’ll gloat.
“In March 2022, after being exonerated by the Mueller Report surrounding false allegations that he colluded with Russia to steal the 2016 Presidential election, Donald Trump sued Hillary Clinton and her associates alleging that they conspired to create the false narrative commonly remembered as “Trump-Russia collusion”. Legacy media only reported on the Trump lawsuit to call it absurd. Hillary campaign spokesman Philippe Reines, named in the suit, sarcastically tweeted: “I look forward to deposing the plaintiff.” Defendants named in the Trump lawsuit are now deposing themselves very effectively in criminal Court as the Durham prosecutions continue.
“Legacy media stopped making much ado over the Mueller investigation and John Durham prosecutions once Trump was exonerated. There was massive coverage of indictments against Trump connected people like Paul Manafort for crimes revealed during Mueller’s investigation but when none related to Trump, The New Yorker declared the Mueller probe a “failure”. The prosecutor is now sorting out wrongdoing from Hillary Clinton’s side.
“Testifying for the defense in the criminal trial of Hillary’s campaign lawyer, Michael Sussmann, Hillary’s 2016 campaign manager Robby Mook, named Hillary as director of the public dissemination of the Russia collusion hoax. The BBC tried to lend a hand the day before Mook’s testimony stating; “there is no evidence that Mrs Clinton herself directed the alleged Sussmann smear”. Since the Trump-Russia collusion hoax has been exposed, the complicit media is forced to remind that some Clinton wrongdoings haven’t been proved in Court. That strategy backfires when the smug deflection is answered the very next day.
“Sussmann is charged surrounding his having brought the Hillary Clinton campaign financed Steele dossier, origin of the Trump-Russia collusion hoax, to the FBI as though it was something real. Sussmann is accused of manipulating the FBI to smear Trump. The FBI investigating the Clinton campaign hoax about Trump gave the hoax institutional credibility. Mook naming Hillary as the controller helps explain why Sussmann failed to disclose that he worked for Hillary Clinton when he gave the false evidence to the FBI. The FBI has confirmed that it’s unlikely that they would have pursued the allegations against Trump had they known the source was a Clinton operative and the evidence fabricated by her campaign.
“With a number of identified Hillary Clinton campaign donors on the jury there’s reason to expect a few “nothingburgers” as Durham prosecution trial outcomes but Trump’s lawsuit is a separate legal action entirely. Sussmann and Mook’s “Hillary made me do it” criminal defense is exactly what Trump’s lawsuit argues. Trump’s lawsuit alleges damages from the public dissemination of the hoax. In defending against Trump’s allegations, Hillary’s lawyers will have to discredit her lawyer and campaign managers’ under-oath testimony at Sussmann’s criminal trial.”
—Paul Bell, via Facebook, reprinted with permission
You may remember Paul from this story, “Our Man In Ottawa: Who Is Benjamin Dichter?”