209 Comments
User's avatar
AL's avatar

I have an unpopular opinion that this video was poorly done. It felt deliberately cheap. But my main problem was at about 5:40 when some random mortician who "doesn't like pharmaceutical companies" opined on an old TED talk where Gates described how vaccines (among other things) could reduce mortality. He said it in such a way that our mortician incorrectly quoted Gates as saying he wants to cull people at the rate of 15% using vaccines. They all know it was a lie--the producers, editors, Stew himself--and still kept it in the film. Cheap, disingenuous shot. Easily debunked and criticized. Stupid.

Do I think Gates is criminally insane and wants to cull people and depopulate the world? Yes, I do. Was lying about what he said the right way to show that to people? No, and IMO it caused more damage to the cause than good.

Makes us all look like lying lunatics. So much so that I question the intent.

Either make a solid film that helps our cause or STFU.

Expand full comment
Steve Stars's avatar

I think the film DOES help our cause. I don't disagree that the quote by Gates seems "out of context and misused" and we both agree, I presume, that Gates is a Malthusian Eugenicist. But perhaps it would have been better if the history of the Gates family behind Planned Parenthood as a major part over 60 million abortions, added to the "philanthropy" of deadly and toxic vaccines to places like India and other nations, combined with feeding deadly AIDS drugs to pregnant women in Africa, were mentioned here as part of the whole Gates family agenda.

So yes, if anything, the "15% culling" comment was rather "off the cuff" and could be misinterpreted, unless you present the entire Gates background.

Later on in the film you see Gates presenting the same Malthusian graphics used centuries ago to illustrate his points.

I have had a lot of problems with so many video clips of "sudden deaths" where these people almost look fake, doing a hypnotic swirl then falling to the floor. But when you see them roll on the ground and disappear under the wheels of a passing train (twice in the film), I don't think that is a stunt, along with people driving trucks and heavy equipment passing out.

All in all, I think the film is very good. People should see this! There if FAR MORE than Gates at TED talk here to see. Our friends who argue "viral theory of existence" will detest the parts with Steve Kirsch and Dr. Peter McCullough, who continue to perpetrate SARS CoV-2 as real and infectious. We have seen this before. Good points, but overall unproductive in stopping the crimes.

This entire issue is really not about science at its root. This is about massive genocide, crime and a medical tyranny resulting in death and economic destruction world-wide on a scale we have never seen before!

Dare I ask, are we splitting hairs here, as they are now planning the next Plan-demic that will hit us all even harder with the same tactics?

My question is WHAT will be EFFECTIVE in waking people up? If parts of this film are dismissed by the public, they are ignoring the morticians and facts, and not even in touch with the problems and solutions.

Expand full comment
Celia Farber's avatar

Thank you Steve.

Expand full comment
Howard's avatar

I share the hopes in spite of the shortcomings. But remember, the big Gates picture has been thoroughly documented and reported by several great journalists over the past 3 years (and some did the work long before covid). The corruption/conflicts of interest/lack of any oversight on Fauci, academia, the health bureaucracy has been thoroughly researched and reported by RFK Jr. and others. And his book was a best seller even though totally blacked out or disparaged in mainstream media. I don't believe Stew Peters has the substance, knowledge, or capability to create and put out what you might be suggesting. I don't know if he has the inclination to, even if he is capable. I'm just hoping this is more of a plus than a minus.

Expand full comment
AL's avatar

I hear you but one must see the film as a whole- it’s credibility is based on that —-not the good parts vs. the lies.

Expand full comment
Russ D's avatar

The bottom line is the Clot Shots ARE killing people in vast numbers. Whether the movie was well made or not......WHO CARES. It's just more proof that these Clot Shots are deadly

Expand full comment
AL's avatar

LOL that's the ENTIRE point. It's not proof of anything. If you want to educate people about how dangerous these shots are, you can't lie, flash MK Ultra bullshit, or quote Tom Hanks. It's a fucking hack job and how effective it is depends entirely on "whether the movie was well made or not."

Expand full comment
Russ D's avatar

Let me guess, you've taken the Clot Shots? People I see bad mouthing this video are the ones who have taken it.

Secret CDC Report reveals at least 1.1 Million Americans have ‘Died Suddenly’ since the COVID Vaccine roll-out & another Government Report proves the COVID Vaccines are to blame

BY THE EXPOSÉ ON NOVEMBER 24, 2022

https://expose-news.com/2022/11/24/secret-cdc-report-1million-americans-died-suddenly-covid-vaccine/

Two Cardiologists Expose COVID Vaccine Links to Cardiac Deaths and Diseases

https://needtoknow.news/2022/11/two-cardiologists-expose-covid-vaccine-links-to-cardiac-deaths-and-diseases/

Vast majority of covid deaths now occurring in the fully jabbed … after Biden and the CDC fraudulently claimed vaccines stop transmission

Wednesday, November 23, 2022 by: Ethan Huff

https://www.naturalnews.com/2022-11-23-vast-majority-covid-deaths-occurring-fully-jabbed.html

The Covid Vaccine Plot

By Llewellyn H. Rockwell, Jr.

https://www.lewrockwell.com/2022/07/lew-rockwell/the-covid-vaccine-plot/

Expand full comment
Howard's avatar

Probably 100 percent of the people here agree with the film's basic assertions about the dangers and cover-ups of the injections. For fence sitters -- and I again wonder how many remaining there are -- I agree with you that credibility IS more important than the actual true information. Most of us here don't even have to watch this film. Personally, I was turned off in the first 5 minutes with the flashy montage of all the true "conspiracies" preceding the plandemic. The boom boom flashiness reminded me of Fox during the "weapons of mass destruction" lie. As for the images themselves that splashed across the screen but not explained at all (MK Ulltra, etc.), I immediately thought of a "normie" throwing up their hands and denigrating another "wacko" conspiracy job, turning it off, and never even getting to the parts specifically focusing on what the film is supposed to be about.

Expand full comment
AL's avatar

That's what I'm talking about. Either Peters is so out of touch or it was deliberate.

Expand full comment
San's avatar

Who in the heck are you & that we should EVEN trust anything you say???

You take a dose of your own medicine & quit belittling & labeling people because they have a differing opinion & assessment than yours!

Expand full comment
Judith's avatar

There is a long debate on Mark Crispin Miller's site today about this documentary.

I am not a Stew Peters fan. Nothing personal. He's just a bit sensational for me.

I think the Gates TED clip, which I actually viewed some time before c-vid, well, I was going to write that it was taken out of context but let me re-phrase - I do not take away what most other's do from that TED talk. I did not interpret it as culling through vaccination. I understood him to mean that you could reverse population growth in certain countries by means of, among other things, vaccination, which would keep people healthier and thereby not having so many children.

I think this clip has been used to try and prove eugenics. But I do not think it is a good choice. I think it is misleading. And God knows we have sooooo much more solid info now to prove what the criminality of the past two and half years.

Also, there is a clip in Stew's documentary that is apparently blatantly incorrect about a sports figure who collapsed during a game. The fellow collapse happened before the vaccine roll-out, and the fellow is fine.

I agree with folk that things like this do a disservice. What is the point of not fact checking to a T?

In any case, there are many more videos out there with lots and lots of information.

The new Great Re-Set video which was linked here yesterday is terrific (in my opinion) Very very well done. Doctors and scientists in French, Germany, Spain. I liked it very much. When you watch it you see the difference in something with very high production standards and something where the standards, for whatever reason, are not that high. I am aware that these endeavors cost a good amount of money and time and talent. It is no easy undertaking.

To each their own.

Expand full comment
Steve Stars's avatar

I agree that the Bill Gates clip used here is open to interpretation and somewhat vague. But the problem remains that Gates and family have been active in monstrous international eugenics programs. which many references cite going back to the Nazis and WW II. Gates and family have already murdered millions of people worldwide, and that wouldn't even include the 60 million US abortions. Remember, Gates as been at this since before 2000.

Long before TED talks, and even the development of vaccine-tracking as a part of our entire lively hood, health and freedom, Gates created software via Microsoft and others to implement a social credit score; which is STILL on the immediate horizon with the NEXT plandemic. This next round is coming and they have already told us to expect it.

Gates, Fauci, Schwab, Harari, Biden etc. all delight in either alluding to, or stating directly what they seriously intend to do---which is basically murder and enslave the entire world population. They laugh about us not taking them seriously! Really! They project exactly what they will do with this evil agenda on anyone that opposes them. Thus, We the People are their own self-designated enemies. They can argue that "we told them what we intended to do, and (with the help of the lying media) the people had no complaints! So we are not to be blamed."

I agree that we should try to present our protests and information as perfectly as possible. We don't want to shoot ourselves in the foot with misleading facts and presentations. But as a documentary film producer going back to 1992, I can tell you that we have accomplished very little in actually stopping these murdering agendas. I don't want to go into what happened with HIV/AID$, but I have seen all of this "critique" before, and all it did was impede the combined effort with misleading trivial discussion rather than effective progress. Most of the support we have now is coming from the growing number of victims rather than the overall public awareness. which is leading to legal measures. But even the work of RFK Jr. is being attacked by some our "our own" people.

Most films and documentaries are effective by the "impression" they make, rather than the details or accuracy. This works both ways, as you can see with the "jab and mask" psyop that locked down the public. While we discuss the trivial issues about our presentations, these genocidal maniacs make their next move.

I always encourage our friends to save your intellectual abilities and ammo for the enemy and take what you can from what is out there, and improve upon it if you can.

Expand full comment
Jennifer's avatar

Truth is the most important tool in our arsenal. I understand mistakes under pressure; but when there is time to edit we should always aim for truth.

Expand full comment
AL's avatar

100%

Expand full comment
Leo's avatar

Yes, low-budget film and misquotes Gates once. However, the rest of the film seems solid and is so confronting and appalling that it has the potential to break thru closed minds. Once you see those blood clot images you can't unsee them. That's good.

Expand full comment
Celia Farber's avatar

"so confronting and appalling." yes.

Expand full comment
INGRID C DURDEN's avatar

totally agree. Things seen cannot be unseen. We have to count on that. And I think the undertakers that spoke up are probably the best part because they do have real proof

Expand full comment
AL's avatar

I hope so Leonora. To me, it doesn't seem to have the punch it should have. Feels like a low budget op ed. But maybe it will resonate with people who are considering that this is a problem for the first time.

Expand full comment
San's avatar

I felt it had extreme punch-Stew Peters knows this world needs a SHOCK to wake some people up! The continual dying off of millions should also!

I, for one, will not be fussing nor damning Peters film - it had tons of info & I think it did NOT go hard enough against Gates & exposing him & his ilk.

There is absolutely NO ONE on the PrO Covid jab side providing ANYTHING of truth & substance.

I read their crap, listen to their abysmal talks & am sick to death of their lies, continual lies, & more lies. Gates & the WEF leaders are some of the most sinister, diabolical people I have ever seen in over 60 years. I will take Stew Peters & his production any day over the malfeasance of the miscreants & their DeathVaxxxes & globa”lust” regimes. Stew Peters has never taken a penny from my pocketbook. These awful global predators already have via govt taxation for these clot shots. I live in the once, long ago, great state of “ILL”inois. All we get here for decades are lies.

Expand full comment
Evil Harry's avatar

No it doesn't make us look like lunatics.

YOU are being as hyberbolic as Stew can sometimes be.

Lots of hard hitting information in that video, with a few missteps.

There are a lot of massive blood clots that have never been seen before.

There is a huge increase in all cause mortality, globally.

There is a drop off in the birth rates, globally.

There is, or was, a significant increase in spontaneous abortions according to the NEJM.

There was a significant increase in the injuries reported to the DMED database, though not as high as was reported.

None of that takes away that the world governments, military, media, health authorities and even local doctors and nurses have openly lied and deceived billions of people.

Expand full comment
Celia Farber's avatar

I agree.

Expand full comment
AL's avatar

Actually, all I’ve done is criticize a film because I feel what we all believe in was not presented well. That has made people here furious, spewing out dozens of facts about why “vaccine bad.” One has nothing to do with the other.

I was just disappointed in the unsophisticated, sometimes disingenuous production itself. My opinion. If people think it was a great film, more power to them.

Expand full comment
Horace the Menace's avatar

It's worth thinking about that Gates quote a little more.

Firstly I agree with you that Stew Peters et al have mischaracterized what Gates said, and that what he actually says is that (paraphrasing) because vaccinations reduce infant mortality, they cause mothers to have less children and thus help keep population down.

But let's think about this a little more. We are told that Africa has an overpopulation problem as a result of Western healthcare reducing mortality. We are then told in the next breath that (presumably further) reducing mortality is the solution to this problem. It doesn't really add up.

We are also asked to believe that vaccines significantly reduce child mortality - that is the mechanism that Gates proposes by which birth rate is reduced. But that is a very questionable assertion itself. I'm sure by this point that most of us have reached the stage of questioning whether any and all vaccines achieve much in the way of improving anyone's health.

I don't think Gates is stupid at all. I think he understands the points I make here very well. So I wonder if Stew Peters et al, even though dishonestly misrepresenting Gates' words, may actually have the right of it - and Gates knows exactly how and why vaccines reduce fertility, and his stated reason is merely a smokescreen.

And finally of course we know that Gates has been caught red-handed in Kenya and India testing vaccines which have no purpose except to reduce fertility.

But you (IMO) are correct to suspect the motive of Stew Peters. He came out of nowhere, had his voice amplified everywhere, and associated himself with every crackpot and "conspiracy shyster" he could find under the sun. Three markers which scream controlled opposition to me - his purpose is to almost certainly to discredit people telling the truth.

Expand full comment
Celia Farber's avatar

Aslo: A virus FROM Africa was supposed to "decimate" Africa, decades ago, because they have so much sex. "Dry" sex preferred by African man according to The New Yorker. Remember all this? Because of "HIV," entire villages were to be "wiped off the map." Eugenics fantasies. African populations have roughly doubled in sub Saharan Africa since mid 80s I believe.

Expand full comment
Sarah's avatar

The entire "documentary" is a psy-op, way-easily debunked, designed to make those of us who will never take the vax look ridiculous. Unfortunately it's working:

https://bartoll.se/2022/11/stew-peters-died-suddenly-psy-op/

https://bartoll.se/2022/10/blood-clots-in-dead-people/

Expand full comment
San's avatar

“The entire documentary” - completely DISAGREE WITH YOU!

Go pedal your negativity to my sweet neighbor who just lost her husband to brain cancer that developed within three months after the double pfizzer jabs & is now in less than a year DEAD. She wishes they had known ANY of this info. Her husband was incredibly healthy & one of our favorite guys in the neighborhood.

She was not “questioning” & dissecting this info like you are.

She is now so mad at the mainstream

Media mafia for not sharing ANYTHING of ANY substance about these horrendous shots. SMH

And God help these embalmers that have to deal with this awful meds. I don’t see anyone of you criticizing here showing ANY empathy to them or the DEAD!

Expand full comment
Sarah's avatar

Fine, go ahead and make a fool of yourself. I have been anti-vax for decades and have been fighting against these dialectics forever. Soon you will find out the truth, that there are forces trying to make us look ridiculous, they prey upon your emotions. Read the links before you disparage them, they will open your eyes to how you are being manipulated.

Expand full comment
Horace the Menace's avatar

It's not just anti-vax - as you are probably well aware.

This is the CIA (and doubtless Illuminati before that and Machiavelli before that, and I'm sure the Book of Documents provides similar instructions too) playbook.

Fill the town square with lies both to discredit anyone speaking the truth and to make the truth hard to find.

WW1, WW2, nuclear weapons, cold war, JFK, AIDS, 9/11, blah, blah, blah. The tactics are the same. We never seem to learn.

But just maybe things are different this time. Covid woke a lot of people up. Then again so did JFK, but their children went back to sleep.

Expand full comment
San's avatar

You, Sarah, are being the manipulator

What kind of a person comes on a Substack & posts Over & over & over & over their post multiple times on a thread? SMH.

Expand full comment
Horace the Menace's avatar

I posted this above so aplogies to everyone else for the repost - but wanted to specifically point Sarah at it.

IMO this is a better critique than the one you linked to:

https://jackanapes.substack.com/p/died-suddenly-is-typical-trash-from

Expand full comment
Sarah's avatar

I posted that one too.

Expand full comment
AL's avatar

Yes, I am not doubting Gates' true intentions--I have no doubt he is criminally insane. Gates = Bad. But what I take issue with is the deliberate misinterpretation of the sound byte to gain ground--as if we are all too stupid to figure it out. And if the stupid people truly can't see the way they've been tricked and lied to the media will do it for them. What good comes out of this? It's just more fodder for how crazy us anti-vaxxers are. Stupid Stew.

We all "know" what Gates thinks, but Stew takes it too far and loses journalistic integrity--really it was a cheap shot, easily debunked.

Expand full comment
Stevanovitch's avatar

Stew Peters suffers, publicly, from what so many of us suffer privately. The gut-wrenching disgust of the false narrative and evil, enough to compel us toward vehement dialogue, vitriol, un- peaceful speech and innuendo. All of which are opposite the way we choose to live our lives and see humanity. But as in all wars, the soldier carries a weapon of death. Nothing peaceful about it. Violence begets violence. So I choose to forgive Stew the Soldier. Remember how hyperactive Steve Kirsch acted 2yrs ago in that interview exposing the lies? He has calmed down a bit, and Stew might do the same. To speak his truth calmly yet powerfully. It has been difficult for me to achieve an effective level of restraint. Being part of the peaceful nonviolent trucker convoy to Ottawa helped.

Expand full comment
Sarah's avatar

The entire "documentary" is a psy-op, way-easily debunked, designed to make those of us who will never take the vax look ridiculous. Unfortunately it's working:

https://bartoll.se/2022/11/stew-peters-died-suddenly-psy-op/

https://bartoll.se/2022/10/blood-clots-in-dead-people/

Expand full comment
San's avatar

Oh, just stop your pathetic negativity & let us grieve with this documentary for the millions dead & dying & will die. IF it stops one person from taking these satanic shots - and living - I APPLAUD it. We have already lost too many because this info was not out front & center at all... just lies & lies & more lies from the meanstream

Propaganda whores.

We have had several who were on the fence about more boosters thank us for sending this info. They are now checking out the website - howbadismybatch.com

Expand full comment
AL's avatar

You're not the person I want to be in a foxhole with. Irrational, combative and irresponsible.

Expand full comment
San's avatar

With your vitriol you won’t even make it to the foxhole - the globalust goons won’t suffer you a moment - they will laugh as they kill off all

of us “useless eaters”. You can’t even

keep the argument civil.

Expand full comment
Leo's avatar

Interesting perspective - "controlled opposition" - maybe so!

Expand full comment
Castigator's avatar

Controlled opposition is the cheapest shot of all. The expression itself may come from the same vocabulary as conspiracy theory. The source is well known.

Expand full comment
Sarah's avatar

The entire "documentary" is a psy-op, way-easily debunked, designed to make those of us who will never take the vax look ridiculous. Unfortunately it's working:

https://bartoll.se/2022/11/stew-peters-died-suddenly-psy-op/

https://bartoll.se/2022/10/blood-clots-in-dead-people/

Expand full comment
Dennis O'Neill's avatar

It's irrelevant if you consider your opinion popular or unpopular as any evidence you have for that assertion is anecdotal. It's thr very small, non-randomly selected sample of people from which you make that assertion that makes it irrelevant.

Bill Gates, as documented by a long history of having pies thrown in his face many years ago, having large crowds of people yell jeers at him in public, and survey data is very, very unpopular. In my opinion, he comes across as a dumb douche bag.

I'm fairly certain that your handwringing about how "Died Suddenly" somehow, allegedly took Bill Gates out of context will be unwarranted, especially when there is other footage of him discussing with government people what genes are reasponsible for human spirituality, and the information about his support for releasing genetically engineered mosquitos in Florida, and the various law suits against him, and his foundation in Africa, and India are also in the public domain. Dean Hammer did the research to identify genes correlated with human spirituality so informed people understand how dangerous Bill Gates is.

Your handwringing is like that of others about how a quick intro to the documentary showing a Big Foot, and 911 footage will somehow discredit it which are, in my opinion, all unfounded.

Survey data repeatedly demonstrates that large percentages of the U.S. population don't believe the official account about 911, and that large percentages of people also believe there is a phenomenon known as Big Foot.

David Paulides recent Big Foot 101 presentations on his Canam Missing 411 you tube channel document copius press accounts of evidence dating back well over a hundred years describing encounters by people with a creature almost always described as humanoid. I think he also references some survey data in his first class.

I would guess that reaching people who believe that 19 morons who couldn't fly a Cessna figured out how to hijack sophisticated jetliner and fly them the way Blue Angels pilots fly top fighter planes, or who without reviewing decades of various forms of evidence for the phenomenon of Big Foot dismiss alternative explanations for both these matters are not going to be convinced that COVID19 is a genocidal, and humanity-enslaviement operation. They're just ignorant, or more likely self absorbed stupid people. Many of them are already dead or have killed their children anyway so therebwill be fewer of them to convince.

Expand full comment
Howard's avatar

Haven't watched, but I share your concerns regardless. MCM pointed out another potential "gotcha" segment in his review. The fascists can overcome -- and have overcome --clear fakes and lies in things like their Ukraine stories and covid and vaccine stories. We can't afford even murky claims, let alone blatantly false.

Expand full comment
Sarah's avatar

The entire "documentary" is a psy-op, way-easily debunked, designed to make those of us who will never take the vax look ridiculous. Unfortunately it's working:

https://bartoll.se/2022/11/stew-peters-died-suddenly-psy-op/

https://bartoll.se/2022/10/blood-clots-in-dead-people/

Expand full comment
AL's avatar

Interesting, because I commented on his recent substack and felt I was being questioned for not giving it the thumbs up.

Expand full comment
Howard's avatar

I just reviewed the comments in that piece and you seem far from alone. I'm not putting this film on my urgent "must watch" list (I can't handle everything), mostly based on the comments themselves, and not just the critical ones. The 'documentary' won't change my feelings. I've been following the mortician revelations, including Looney, as well as people like Carrie Madej from the beginning of this nightmare. Even MCM and numerous 'favorable reviewers' have cited enough blunders to make me uncomfortable -- taken together, they seem to add up to more than a trivial amount. I have some prior reservations about Stew Peters myself. I don't need the letdown. And hope, on balance, that more "fence sitters" (are there still any left) will be swayed our way than pushed the other.

Expand full comment
Charles Clemens's avatar

Your comments bring to mind the directing/producing skills of Dinesh D'Souza. Admittedly, I did not see 2,000 MULES; but I did see an earlier film by him and that has saved me a few dollars because I will not submit myself to another two hours of cut/paste nonsense.

Maybe the film will be good. Who knows?

I'll probably watch a few minutes of DIED SUDDENLY. It's depressing to keep watching and reading the same things over and over while realizing the government will continue to do whatever it wants to do with us.

I only wish the heartless bastards would give us another big dose of MK-ULTRA. Visions and transcendental experiences beat the hell out of being poisoned.

Expand full comment
AL's avatar

lol you said it!

Expand full comment
INGRID C DURDEN's avatar

I agree with AL. I think this could have been way better done, with less loose threads. As Mark C Miller states, several mistakes were made and only help the narrative to discard it. If you want to dismantle a narrative, you have to be like a lawyer in a court room, very accurate, very precise, and not leave anything to be desired. But even with these missers, I think people who were beginning to doubt might change course. And considering the number of views that is indeed happening !

Expand full comment
SheThinksLiberty's avatar

Similar criticisms came at the early films questioning or bringing to light additional facts related to the attacks of Sep 11. Many people chose to "throw the baby out with the bath water" over films such as "Loose Change" or "9/11 Mysteries." IMO, regardless of any errors in these films, their overall message came through loud and clear -- "Folks, we have a problem..."

The same holds for "Died Suddenly," IMO. Don't like the visual reference to Big Foot or Sep 11 or the misinterpretation of Slimeball Gates exact words? I get it, but the overall message of the film is -- clearly -- "Folks, we have a problem..." Sterility, fetal death, miscarriages, malformation, new births dropping off a cliff...

Expand full comment
INGRID C DURDEN's avatar

indeed. Mistakes are human, and presentation is a taste. I think this film is probably more to the taste of younger people, but it still gets the message. May be some people will watch the vaxxed films and realize what poisons are being pumped into their children (and animals)

Expand full comment
Deb Hawthorne's avatar

Yea. I did not bother to share it because the population thing would make people shut down. The embalmers talking and being interviewed was good but putting the Gates thing in there was in poor taste. I think people would have watched intently u til it gets to the whole population thing. I actually stopped watching it. The one done in UK was a much better film. Interviewing the vaccine injured.

Expand full comment
Howard's avatar

I believe I saw the UK film. Agree it was good.

Expand full comment
Sarah's avatar

The entire "documentary" is a psy-op, way-easily debunked, designed to make those of us who will never take the vax look ridiculous. Unfortunately it's working:

https://bartoll.se/2022/11/stew-peters-died-suddenly-psy-op/

https://bartoll.se/2022/10/blood-clots-in-dead-people/

Expand full comment
Dennis O'Neill's avatar

No, it's not. "Died Suddenly" does not meet any definition of a psyop. It's fairly well done but woefully incomplete. RFK, Jr.'s "The Real Anthony Fauci" tells a much more complete story of the COVID19 genocide. "Died Suddenly" is a small bit player in the scheme of things.

Expand full comment
Evil Harry's avatar

But Died Suddenly is much harder hitting, due to showing irrefutable evidence of the horrifying clots.

Expand full comment
SheThinksLiberty's avatar

Do you agree that "died suddenly" is a "thing," though?

Expand full comment
AL's avatar

Of course, but coming off like idiots doesn’t help convince the non believers - it has the opposite effect.

Expand full comment
San's avatar

Your opinion of “coming off like idiots” - actually makes you look more like the idiot - generally blanketing someone with a very negative label is not the way to win an argument. I place no credence with you.

Expand full comment
AL's avatar

No it doesn't. "Generally blanketing someone"--what are you? in the 6th grade? I criticized the FILM, not you. And I'm not trying to win anything. But if there were a prize, I would hope it would be a punch in the mouth for you. You're an asshole all over this thread, yelling at everyone who doesn't have the exact same opinion as you do. Grow up.

Expand full comment
SheThinksLiberty's avatar

I take it you mean Stew Peters, et.al., "coming off like idiots"?

Expand full comment
AL's avatar

Yes, I do--I feel represented as a group in this video. People can argue about that, but the point is i think the CAUSE comes off bad because of this movie.

Expand full comment
JL DAY's avatar

Do you recall the name of the UK fill you speak of? Wondering If I might have seen it. If not would like to check it out.

Expand full comment
J.P.'s avatar

You're forgetting this is the same 'Producer' who put out Brian Ardis "Watch the Water."

I stopped watching Stew Peters then, this one is mediocre for the points you've raised.. Why should I send this to anyone when I can just forward them straight to the death reports on t.me/covidbc etc?

Expand full comment
Dennis O'Neill's avatar

Right, because, a few people get into a minor snit about a pretty well done documentary, a slight bit heavy on the sensational in the quick intro but overall not a bad effort, and not nearly as comprehensive as "The Real Anthony Fauci," I'll stop watching Stew regularly interview Karen Kingston who, along with David Martin, and Katherine Watt, provides a comprehensive look at all the patents of the merger of nanotech, and biotechnology, to weaponize both, all the peer-reviewed literature that underpins those patents, and the politico-legal structure that underpins this genocide. Okay, but what if I dont want to throw the babybout with the bathwater because I have discernment, and know that some people will likely attribute excess mortality to COVID19?

Expand full comment
J.P.'s avatar

Yes, please stop watching that grifter. It might do your bitter soul some good along the way.

Expand full comment
Dennis O'Neill's avatar

Okay, you coward hiding out behind "JP." Are those your gangsta rapper initials for Juvenile Pussy or is it Juicy Pud? I always get those two confused. You understand that many medicinal plants, or ones also high in nutritious compounds are bitter, like dandelion greens for example. The slightly bitter twinge in my soul is simply medicine to ward off idiots like you. The initials "DS" for Dumb Schlub might be a more apropos hideout for you. While I despise their high incidence of sexual deviance, inbreeding, and their propensity to orchestrate genocide, the Ashkenazim do have a wonderfully descriptive language in Yiddish.

Expand full comment
J.P.'s avatar

Ad hominem. Your argument is invalid (and I hate rap, can't stand it, so there's a false assumption you can put in your dandelion bag of bitterness). It's interesting watching you make a fool of yourself, though. Good job 👏

Expand full comment
Dennis O'Neill's avatar

Okay, Juicy Pud, the ad hominum anonymous-destroying-hominid hanging out practicing the subtle art of subterfuge on Substack so stealthily. It's interesting watching you practice your craft so cleverly. You're an intellect with which to be reckoned. Good job!!!

Expand full comment
Deb Hawthorne's avatar

Agree

Expand full comment
Dennis O'Neill's avatar

No, it's a waste of time to read idiots like that who don't know much, and can't figure out that: Sensational sells, and large percentages of the population knows 911 didn't happen the way the official idiotic narrative claims it did; believe something called Big Foot exists; that the vast majority of the population know JFK was murdered by a CIA conspiracy: that Alex Jones has a following that dwarfs any presstitute media; that no amount of COVD19 info will likely reach the idiots who still believe 911 was done by 19 morons who couldnt fly Cessnas; that blod clots don't remotely look like in quality, quantity or size like what the doc. shows being removed from dead bodies; and that this is one small here today, gone tomorrow piece of a much larger puzzle so some nit wit with a few subscribers on substack who fancies himself Roger Ebert won't influence the narrative in any manner as much as Stew Peters has. I thought the snake venom issue was actually a possibility although I was skeptical, and thus would not have presented it the way Stew did. Snake venom is used in biomedical research, and the first ACE inhibitor, Capoten, or captopril, was discovered in, and derived from snake venom so I investigated Stew's info, which simply blew the isolated use of snake venom in some research all out of proportion so he dropped it.

Expand full comment
Evil Harry's avatar

Remember though, that Stew only ran with the story that Bryan Ardis posited.

Stew is frequently too over the top and his rhetoric always runs hot, but he is usually still more honest, fair and balanced, than all of the mainstream media and leftist alternative media.

I suspect that even if the film had been absolutely perfect, our "allies" would have still tried to tear it down.

I also appears to me that in the current world, facts no longer matter.

If they did, pedo Pete wouldn't have been "elected, Bolsonaro wouldn't have "lost" and the democrats wouldn't be able to openly launder their wages through the Ukrainian slaughter house, that the US government caused.

Also, the UK wouldn't have been able to install two politicians that nobody voted for and nobody wanted.

Interesting times.

Expand full comment
Horace the Menace's avatar

If I didn't know better I would suspect that you were disingenuously discrediting the essay by mischaracterizing it and the author in such a way as to persuade people not to click on the link.

Expand full comment
Dennis O'Neill's avatar

No. I wasted the time it took to read the Roger Ebert wannabe. He's pretty dumb.

Expand full comment
Horace the Menace's avatar

Odd. From your response it seems that you entirely underestimated his level of knowledge and misunderstood his arguments. Just my view of course.

Expand full comment
Howard's avatar

Thanks for this.

Expand full comment
jacquelyn sauriol's avatar

No amount of wet blanketing can stop this fire, truth will consume the TNI and the country eventually. Who knew a few embalmers would turn out to be the heros of the day.

Expand full comment
Celia Farber's avatar

I agree.

Expand full comment
Evil Harry's avatar

Embalmers, hedge fund managers (O'Dowd) and lawyers (Renz), no less.

Expand full comment
San's avatar

Notice how enraged ol “AL”

here is getting because of sensible pushback. He’s definitely NOT helping the cause, sadly.

Expand full comment
AL's avatar

She, you utter fuckwit. I’m only enraged by you, a manic, angry man prone to hysterics over a film critique by someone who works tirelessly for the cause. You have no idea. You do nothing but troll. Please fuck right off.

Expand full comment
Sarah's avatar

The entire "documentary" is a psy-op, way-easily debunked, designed to make those of us who will never take the vax look ridiculous. Unfortunately it's working:

https://bartoll.se/2022/11/stew-peters-died-suddenly-psy-op/

https://bartoll.se/2022/10/blood-clots-in-dead-people/

Expand full comment
Evil Harry's avatar

What rubbish.

Please debunk the recent discovery of never seen before clotting?

Please debunk the sudden global drop in birth rates.

Please debunk the global rise in excess deaths.

Please debunk the massive increase in athletes dropping dead compared to all previous years.

Expand full comment
Jerry Newfield's avatar

The truth is getting more attention. This documentary, MCM's "died suddenly" series and Ed Dowd's forthcoming book, all of this matters.

Expand full comment
Celia Farber's avatar

Yes.

Expand full comment
Sarah's avatar

The entire "documentary" is a psy-op, way-easily debunked, designed to make those of us who will never take the vax look ridiculous. Unfortunately it's working:

https://bartoll.se/2022/11/stew-peters-died-suddenly-psy-op/

https://bartoll.se/2022/10/blood-clots-in-dead-people/

Expand full comment
Dr Dennis Kinnane OMD LAc RPh's avatar

Reading these comments I am reminded of Teddy Roosevelt and his quote:

“It is not the critic who counts: not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles or where the doer of deeds could have done better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood, who strives valiantly, who errs and comes up short again and again, because there is no effort without error or shortcoming, but who knows the great enthusiasms, the great devotions, who spends himself for a worthy cause; who, at the best, knows, in the end, the triumph of high achievement, and who, at the worst, if he fails, at least he fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who knew neither victory nor defeat.”

Expand full comment
Celia Farber's avatar

I love that quote.

Expand full comment
Stevanovitch's avatar

In this you are far from alone; a screenshot will help me commit it to memory. As i have done for INVICTUS. Some prose is just too good to leave on the page.

Expand full comment
San's avatar

I gave that framed to my atty hubbs one year for his birthday.

We have seen over the decades many Hollyweird films produced & marketed that made millions upon millions $$$$ & be awarded various awards & have often wondered why they deserved the accolades.

Stew Peters does not have millions $$$ at his disposal nor is he in the running for an Academy award. Did he charge ANY money to watch this? NOPE.

We are going to reserve our judgement of him or his motives & simply be thankful he is trying to get the truth out there that these embalmers & funeral directors are finding & the crimes ag humanity that Gates has propagated with his demonic eugenics poorly disguised as philanthropy.

Expand full comment
Sarah's avatar

It's clear you haven't read the links. Stew Peters is WELL known to the truth/patriot community, he's already done one bullshit "documentary" (remember the snake venom idiocy?) He's been flashing illuminati signs and hand signals for ages. Look with your eyes and your head. Your emotions are being played upon. Again.

And the embalmers are lying. Plenty of other embalmers are quick to tell the truth: those white stringy things and clots are NORMAL in dead bodies.

Expand full comment
Dr Dennis Kinnane OMD LAc RPh's avatar

Is Sarah a “troll”? Sure sounds like it…

Expand full comment
San's avatar

I think she is a troll - I would NOT give her ANY credence - she is obsessed with posting over & over & over & over the same post here on this one thread!

Expand full comment
Sarah's avatar

Who the hell do you think you are? I comment here all the time, and suddenly because YOU didn't read my links or think for a moment, just because you don't WANT to agree with me, I am now a "troll"? You sound just like a liberal. And so do you, San.

Expand full comment
San's avatar

Sweetie - I checked out your links. You are infatuated with an extreme sports guru from Sweden who claims he has 1,000 clients & has written 8 books apparently over a 26 yr period.

I am not enthralled with Stew Peters. I am thankful for the movie/documentary just the same. You claim to be an anti/vaxxer - yet, in looking at who you follow in your Substack articles - you have hardly anyone that would be the usual for anyone questioning the vaxxcene narrative or being vaxxcene hesitant or vaxxx questioning or “anti-vaxx”. Yet, for some reason you come on here & your only schickt appears to be the continual, obsessive posting of this Swedish guy’s views/links. This is often what a troll does. Are you not even aware of that? Have YOU gone to Steve Kirsch’s recent Substack addressing the criticisms of lesser concerns Re the movie? If you are genuinely concerned about the clotting issues which cause a myriad of other issues including death from these Covid 19 shots, then check out other substacks addressing this. There are wayyy too many brilliant, informed, true scientific intellectuals, scientists, doctors, & truth-seekers discussing these issues that Peters is highlighting here in the major message of the film - for us to completely diss him as you have repeatedly done here.

Capisce?

Expand full comment
Evil Harry's avatar

Nicely done.

Expand full comment
Sarah's avatar

The entire "documentary" is a psy-op, way-easily debunked, designed to make those of us who will never take the vax look ridiculous. Unfortunately it's working:

https://bartoll.se/2022/11/stew-peters-died-suddenly-psy-op/

https://bartoll.se/2022/10/blood-clots-in-dead-people/

Expand full comment
The Jesuit Cat's avatar

No doubt there are infiltrators, paid opposition. It's all in the optics. Our enemy is the master of the media and neuro linguistic programing mixed with sorcery.

Expand full comment
Stevanovitch's avatar

Could Stew Peters be among them? I dont think he makes any attempt to fool anyone; rather his approach is human, and therefore emotional.

Expand full comment
Sarah's avatar

Stew Peters is already well known as a charlatan within the patriot community. Remember the ridiculous "snake venom in the water" crap? That was him. He's in the business of producing "documentaries" to make US look like idiots.

Expand full comment
SheThinksLiberty's avatar

So, so apropos! Thank you!

Expand full comment
Amy Sukwan's avatar

I've watched this twitter trend up to the top, then disappear, then reappear, then trend up to the top again here in Thailand. Now it's disappeared again.

I want to do a deep dive on the mechanisms of guilt after the death of someone close. There are a few twits out there that are picking apart the movie based on A: Not everyone in the collapse trailer to "Died Suddenly" actually died (I didn't assume that they all did: I know certain ones like Heather McDonald who seem quite alive. It was a collage of collapses, not necessarily deaths based on the narration). B: Some of those collapsed people have even explained away why they collapsed as anything but the vaccine (of course they have) and C: It's all antivaxxer conspiracy theory tinfoil hat wearing misinformation superspreaders with some ax to grind and probably profiting off their fomenting of panic so here's some big examples of who these bad guys are. See none of these arguments actually attack the root premise of the movie, because they can't. Deaths are up and births are down basically globally though I'm sure they could cherry pick examples where it isn't. If I were jabbed I would be terrified to watch the movie though, quite frankly. I'd even be more angry if I had been pushing my loved ones on safe and effective and a few died suddenly not that long afterwards. That's staring into the abyss right there.

Expand full comment
Celia Farber's avatar

Precisely.

Expand full comment
Ernie Rockwell's avatar

This says it as well as any comment I've read so far. I saw the documentary and

thought it was great. I don't expect a multi-million $ Hollywood quality production

for a documentary that had no backing and was free to watch. In spite of that, I

thought it was very well done and will scare the hell out of anyone who allows

themselves to soak in the revelations therein.

It is always possible to nitpick, perhaps legitimately, at something but T Rosevelt's

quote given in another reply says it well. My main thing I was wondering if

the pictures of the man twirling and falling under a moving train, do have the

look of possibly being spliced but I'm definitely not claiming this is the case.

If they were, it would definitely not be Stew Peters who did so.

I'm not following the twisted logic of the Gates quote criticism, where he says

a good vaccine can reduce population by 10 to 15%. The movie is about

dying suddenly (and collapsing suddenly and surviving), and not about the

prior African vax campaigns - going down all these rabbit holes would make for

a too-long documentary. As far as what those who want to write scathing

reviews of the movie (on Twitter, say), they will always find a target, even if

it has to be totally fabricated.

Expand full comment
San's avatar

Yes, thank you.

Expand full comment
Sarah's avatar

This "documentary" had PLENTY of deep state backing. Read my links.

Expand full comment
Sarah's avatar

The entire "documentary" is a psy-op, way-easily debunked, designed to make those of us who will never take the vax look ridiculous. Unfortunately it's working:

https://bartoll.se/2022/11/stew-peters-died-suddenly-psy-op/

https://bartoll.se/2022/10/blood-clots-in-dead-people/

Expand full comment
Dennis O'Neill's avatar

No, "Died Suddenly" doesnt meet any definition of a psyop. It's fairly well done but woefully incomplete. RFK, Jr.'s "The Real Anthony Fauci" tells a much more complete story of the COVID19 genocide. "Died Suddenly" is a small bit player in the scheme of things.

Expand full comment
SheThinksLiberty's avatar

Thanks for your comments on this topic, Dennis. They've been spot-on.

For people who love to nitpick, I can add one re the RFK, Jr. book. It doesn't have an index! That's my pet peeve -- and a big one. It diminishes the usability of the book, but do I throw out the whole book??

Question answers itself.

Expand full comment
Dennis O'Neill's avatar

The publisher probably wanted to get the book out quickly so didn't have time to index it. I was referring to the documentary based on the book in which Celia has a few segments. I'm sure the book is far more extensive as RFK, Jr. has been investigating criminals for a long time. His release of the Simpsonwood docs should have led to criminal prosecutions of the CDC, and others two decades ago.

Expand full comment
SheThinksLiberty's avatar

Indexing software makes indexing very easy.

Be that as it may, my comment was only to drive home how nitpicking, as I call it regarding the "Died Suddenly" film (or the early films on Sep 11), provides excuses for "throwing the baby out with the bath water."

Thank you for the reference re the Simpsonwood documents.

Expand full comment
Dennis O'Neill's avatar

Oh, I guess I should have figured there's software to do that since it's a relatively easy thing to automate. The Simpsonwood docs were leaked by a participant at an offsite conference the CDC held where all sorts of nefarious stuff between top academics, the CDC, and others was worked up. It's a big file, but it's available on the CHD org's website. Sharyl Attikson exposed the CDC twice for fraud, and the FBI tried to plant child porn on her husband's computer. An Irish immigrant living in the Chicago area wrote a book exposing the Irish Potato Famine as something much different, and a planned genocide by the English. The FBI arrested him on some bullshit but he beat them. Americans need to dismantle the federal government. The Convention of States movement is making progress.

Expand full comment
The Jesuit Cat's avatar

Reading through RFK's book again. Excellent documentation.

Expand full comment
The Jesuit Cat's avatar

Your debunker evidently never heard of Semmelweiss. Too much ad hominem. Nice try. Needs work. Maybe less emotional fogbank

Expand full comment
Sarah's avatar

Clearly you didn't read my links. It's not a "debunk", it's explaining why the "documentary" is a psy-op, and a TRAP for those who are against the vaccines. I am as anti-vax as a person can get. Read it before you comment on it.

Expand full comment
San's avatar

😜🤣🤪🤣😂 IF you are an anti/Vaxxer & as “anti-vaxxer as anyone can get” - then you are the type that gives anti-vaxxers a bad name and does not help this vilified community at all. You actually help the pro-deathshot crowd. Sad.

Expand full comment
Sarah's avatar

Look, San. You can disagree all you want, but you are doing so without even READING what I posted. Go read it, use your head, and not your emotions.

Expand full comment
San's avatar

Sweetie - you need to go read Steve Kirsch’s substacks before you come on here demanding over & over & over & over & over & over & over & over that we read your crap! Otherwise...you just look like a little “troll” with actually no substance, but possibly OCD.

Ever heard of Dr Ryan Cole? Hmmmm???

Expand full comment
Jason's avatar

I always found Stew to be a bit sensationalist, and more so in this film. However, it seems to have gained a lot of traction, and even if it does no more than sow a seed of doubt in folk who would otherwise not have listened, well then job well done.

Expand full comment
San's avatar

People will discredit anything that they judge not be perfect.

Good Lord, Jesus walked a perfect life & look what happened to him!

Stew Peters, I don’t believe has ever claimed perfection or be the Savior.

I am getting pretty disgusted with the negative comments here. Like any of you took it upon yourselves to try & produce ANY video at all yourselves to expose this darkness & these revelations???

Oh, but your Substack articles are reaching millions... riiight.

No, they might reach hundreds, maybe even thousands, thankfully.

If you or Stew save one life with ANY of this - I AM THANKFUL!

Expand full comment
Sarah's avatar

Remember the stupid "snake venom in the water" b.s.? That was Stew Peters too. He is already well known in the patriot community, he works for [them], and his "documentaries" are tailor made to make those of us who are against vaccines look like idiots. And by the way, one of my links is directly about the embalmers story. Go ask your local embalmer, and you will find out the truth: those clots and white stringy things are the NORMAL result of a dead body being refrigerated for many days before the embalming process.

Expand full comment
Sarah's avatar

The entire "documentary" is a psy-op, way-easily debunked, designed to make those of us who will never take the vax look ridiculous. Unfortunately it's working:

https://bartoll.se/2022/11/stew-peters-died-suddenly-psy-op/

https://bartoll.se/2022/10/blood-clots-in-dead-people/

Expand full comment
Dennis O'Neill's avatar

No, it's not. It's fairly well done but woefully incomplete. RFK, Jr.'s "The Real Anthony Fauci" tells a much more complete story of the COVID19 genocide. "Died Suddenly" is a small bit player in the scheme of things.

Expand full comment
Margaret Anna Alice's avatar

Josh Guetzkow cites some very valid concerns with "Died Suddenly":

https://jackanapes.substack.com/p/died-suddenly-is-typical-trash-from

He addresses some of the issues that concerned me while watching and made me hesitate to recommend it without reservation.

My hope is that someone (paging Sage Hana!) will create an edited version with just the funeral industry testimonies, embalmer footage, and select interviews (e.g., Steve Kirsch). I don't want people to discredit those very compelling and valid bits because of the problematic, sensationalistic parts tainting the rest of the documentary.

Expand full comment
Evil Harry's avatar

I though that Josh's piece was an unnecessarily angry rant.

IIRC, He dimissed the claim about high rates of miscarriages, but neglected to even mention the fact that it was corroborated by the NEJM paper that confirmed an 82% spontaneous abortion rate in first trimester women.

Expand full comment
San's avatar

People will discredit anything that they judge not be perfect.

Good Lord, Jesus walked a perfect life & look what happened to him!

Stew Peters, I don’t believe has ever claimed perfection or up the Savior.

I am getting pretty disgusted with the negative comments here. Like any of you took it upon yourselves to try & produce ANY video at all yourselves to expose this darkness & these revelations???

Oh, but your Substack articles are reaching millions... riiight.

No, they might reach hundreds, maybe even thousands.

If you or Stew save one life with ANY of this - I AM THANKFUL!

Expand full comment
Margaret Anna Alice's avatar

I, too, am thankful if this helps wake people up and saves lives, and if you read my comment, you will see I praised the valuable content while expressing concerns that our opponents will use errors to discredit the entire message, which is why we must work so hard to hold ourselves to the highest standards of integrity and accuracy.

Your response seems disproportionate to the statements I made, so perhaps you were responding to others. In any case, lashing out at those of us who fight this battle on Substack instead of producing documentaries (few of us possessing the resources to do so) conflicts with your stated intention to save lives. As it happens, many of our Substack articles *do* reach millions, are republished in multiple languages at hundreds of outlets around the world, and are shared by countless people on multiple platforms. These articles contain numerous (in the case of my articles, sometimes hundreds) links to substantiating evidence that people can examine for corroboration and deeper exploration.

There is value in every form of expression—documentaries, articles, books, short videos, music. Whatever people are capable of contributing to the cause can help with our shared goals of resisting tyranny and saving lives.

I understand you are feeling defensive for Stew and this documentary, but you may not realize that pointing out errors that can be excised makes the documentary stronger and even more persuasive, just like the errata Steve Kirsch is collecting for RFK Jr.’s book. That is one of the strengths of our community—this isn’t a choir singing in unison but thousands of individual voices, each with our own strengths. A brilliant data analyst can identify a mistake in a physician’s analysis or vice versa. We work together to arrive at solid facts and truth, and constructive critiques are a vital part of that process.

Expand full comment
San's avatar

Understand & will take this to heart.

It has been my personal view that no matter how hard this community tries to be diligent in pursuing truth & not error - the lies & vilification will ALWAYS be there. They do not care how truthful 99% of the messengers are or the content - they will ALWAYS focus on the very minute, possibly “trivial”, possibly incorrectly stated or presented because THAT is what they do to hide their outright lies. With ALL of Gates horrendous lies & malfeasance & buying off people & world organizations- everyone on this side should be gratuitous enough to never give ANY inch to Gates & his ilk, because they will take a mile.

On the other side of this coin - no one human that has ever walked this earthy sod will ever be perfect in their truths & presentations & information- because true science is always evolving, revealing, teaching us. We ALL make mistakes. We are all flawed. Does that mean Stew Or anyone in this war should not at least try?

I was simply appalled at the focus here on what the other side says. I have come not to really give any credence to what the other side says, because they are such scoundrels & not to really care what they say. They are killing people - whether consciously or unconsciously. If they repent of their ways or at the very least, express some even minute expression of sorrow - I might be willing to give credence & understanding to them. I personally, have NEVER seen ANY sorrow nor repentance of their malfeasance or the ineptitude in this arena. Perhaps you have - which would be amazing & wonderful. That is no excuse for us to present wrong info intentionally. I am simply NOT going to join in with the small chorus here singing, & reveling in the few faults of the movie/documentary. And, yes, I did NOT mean to lump you in with those few. I apologize for that.

Expand full comment
Margaret Anna Alice's avatar

I appreciate that, San, and I understand where you’re coming from. The difficulty for me was seeing such powerful material (funeral industry interviews, embalmer footage, Steve’s interview, etc.) marred by mistakes that our opponents will single out as an excuse to dismiss the entire production. I think sharing those clips independently will still be of great value to our overall cause.

Expand full comment
San's avatar

I understand & applaud you now. Thanks for the clarification. And...thank YOU for your many stellar articles - I do hope all of these are reaching millions-because tragically, the other side has people who want to reduce the population of God’s green earth by billions. Over two years ago when I started to try & find info on journey, because my neighbors in our cul-de-sac all wanted to know if everyone got vaxxxed & my hubbs & I did not feel compelled to discuss our status of health, etc at all - we were told by one neighbor in a text that because they did not know our status, we could not come to the cul-de-sac “Friendsgiving Dinner” IF we did not get the vaxxx for the safety & welfare of others. My hubbs wrote back a very diplomatic email declining graciously, but offering to civilly discuss different aspects of this arena in a logical, analytical manner & simply posted the Israeli study link.

No, they had absolutely no interest in even discussing the possibility that there could be any other ideas, etc. They had ALL bought into the safe & effective. They are all boosted now & two of the seven having serious health issues. Another one has died after receiving the Pfizzzer double-jab - he was my favorite neighbor - such a good guy - 65 yrs old - in very good health - he & his wife bought in to the fearporn from the 24/7 media cycle & Fraucchhii & all the others. Within 3 months he got a terrible tumor on the brain. He is now gone in a little over a year after terrible chemo & brain surgery & all. His wife NOW tells me she wish they would have known what this movie showed- since she is now willing to at least listen. I think she fears for herself. My heart hurts for her. Since my hubbs is a Constitutional lawyer of over 50 yrs & had personally witnessed in DC decades ago how the Pharmass lobbyists work - it really left a very bad taste in his mouth for the arm-twisting, the extreme wasteful spending & no accountability & then from the film, Vaxxed, found out about Congress selling their soul in 1986. He saw how bad the Pharmass were in their control & propaganda when h was there. He left the work he was doing in the DC cesspool & has never wanted to go back.

We live a quiet, peaceful life. But, I was reared by my discerning Dad to question everything, even God. He told me God could handle it! ;)

So, in the late 80’s I had my first baby. Went to a well-respected Pediatrician’s office/clinic in an affluent Chicagoland suburb. My Mom went with me. She was appalled that they did not have a well-baby room & sick baby room. We all sat next to each other - well baby & sick. My baby within a day would come down sick. My old-school thinking mom encouraged me to skip the monthly well visits. So, by the third month & the vaxxes were being pushed, I simply asked to see the schedule. At that time, the IL Dept of Health (corrupt, unbeknownst to me) “recommended” 17 shots in the first 22 months of a baby’s life! I hesitated & asked the Dr what was in the first set of shots. I was treated as if I was horrible for simply asking. I remember the nurse got all huffy, the Dr did not answer my question & they looked at me like I had horns! I was so shocked at their response to a simple question that I had the wherewithal to say I would delay a month. When my mom & I got out to the car she quietly said, “That seems like ALOT of shots in a very short time, I wouldn’t do that to myself, let alone a little baby!” I listened to her, the light went on - and that amazing baby is now almost 34 with no vaxxes ever, no illnesses except common colds, and our entire immediate family (17 of us) all got covid & all survived with no covid vaxxx needed. Happy dance & thank you, God. I have learned to despise the “system” & the vaxxx “industry”.

I do not despise anyone trying their best to inform folks with any info they have. Is all the info correct? - maybe, maybe not. But, the info from the vile vaxxx industry is awful in comparison.

And my neighbors - we exchange pleasantries & I still love them. I just don’t chose to discuss health issues unless they ask. And I thank God everyday for my imperfect parents & hubbs who were/are perfect for me.

I have two degrees in education & left the school system to take care of my Mom for the last 27 yrs of her life - she only had a smallpox shot her entire 96 years of her amazing, healthy life. I am & continue to be blessed. Thank you all who are trying to win this war FOR our health & personal freedom & informed choices. I appreciate you more than it may seem. You really are staunch advocates for truth.

Expand full comment
AL's avatar

Oh you finally get it now, do you? It only took 50 commenters to get you to finally STFU.

Expand full comment
Horace the Menace's avatar

I think it is possible that you are missing the well documented fact that "the enemy" employs double and triple agents and runs controlled opposition information operations. They do this because it helps them.

There are several forms such information operations take

- to muddy the waters by filling the town square with so many red herrings that the real one is hard to find.

- to discredit the truth by association with obvious nonsense.

- to disguise important truths by revealing lesser truths whie still hiding the greater.

All these forms have one goal - to mislead and confuse.

For what its worth, I happen to think that Sarah is correct in asserting that Stew Peters is indeed controlled opposition (I make no statement about any other assertions Sarah makes, or the links she posts). And therefore that his work is intended to help the enemy, not us. We all can of course form our own judgment about who he actually helps - it is perfectly possible for propaganda ops like this to backfire - which may well be the case in this instance.

Expand full comment
Sarah's avatar

Yes, these lies are reaching a LOT of people, which is why I am posting that it is a psy-op.

Expand full comment
Evil Harry's avatar

Please explain your reasoning behind the ludicrous psy-op claim.

Expand full comment
San's avatar

She keeps posting the same thing over & over - with no documentation & “claims” to be an anti-vaxxer. It’s like she is obsessed with her own view/opinion. She is NOT helpful to the cause.

Expand full comment
Sarah's avatar

And none of you bother to read them.

Expand full comment
Sarah's avatar

Read. The. Links. I. Posted.

Expand full comment
Evil Harry's avatar

I did. They're not based in reality.

Expand full comment
Sarah's avatar

The entire "documentary" is a psy-op, way-easily debunked, designed to make those of us who will never take the vax look ridiculous. Unfortunately it's working:

https://bartoll.se/2022/11/stew-peters-died-suddenly-psy-op/

https://bartoll.se/2022/10/blood-clots-in-dead-people/

Expand full comment
Evil Harry's avatar

So, debunk the entire thing, it if it's so easy.

The fact that the guy you linked to, claims (amongst other things), that the clots are obvious fakes, lets me know to take his opinions with a large pinch of NaCl.

The funeral directors and embalmers are adamant that they never saw these types of clots before the jab rollout.

I know who I would trust on this one.

Expand full comment
Sarah's avatar

You clearly didn't read the links I posted. One of them is about those embalmers - those clots are NORMAL in dead bodies, they are lying about it, this "documentary" is sensationalizing those images and playing on your emotions. LOOK at what I posted. I never said it was a "debunk", I said it is a psy-op. Right there in the headline, "using a grain of truth to tell a LOT of lies." STOP trusting. Stop believing. Start investigating and using discernment with an open mind.

Expand full comment
Evil Harry's avatar

I did read the links.

The embalmers and undertakers will know a damn sight better than the guy you linked to.

The professionals say they have never seen these clots before the rollout, while you said it was easy to debunk.

If anything is a "psyop", it is you and the pages you linked to.

Expand full comment
Sarah's avatar

Oh FFS. Yeah, I'm trying to get you to see alternate information. I'm asking you to use discernment and logic. I saying use your head and not your emotions. I'm saying stop believing things and verify them. If that's a "psy-op" then so be it. You want to trust Stew Peters? Go ahead, make yourself look ridiculous. The truth will come out anyway.

Expand full comment
Evil Harry's avatar

I do use my head. Thank you.

For that guy to dismiss the actual testimonies and video evidence of embalmers and undertakers is idiotic.

Your blind acceptance of his argument is worse.

BTW, YOU are the one that insisted the film was a psy-op.

Expand full comment
Stan_R's avatar

Copyrights? $25K fine(s)...Sage?? ""They"" would like taking Sage down over this poorly thought out video.

Expand full comment
Celia Farber's avatar

No reason to speculate what the film makers would do.

Expand full comment
Margaret Anna Alice's avatar

Wouldn't it be covered under fair use? And wouldn't they want people to share clips??

Expand full comment
Stan_R's avatar

Yes, covered under fair use act and they want the video shared.

I was thinking about another video Celia posted with warnings about no copying etc...SORRY

Expand full comment
Crixcyon's avatar

It's an excellent but gruesome wake up call for the masses.

Expand full comment
Malignant's avatar

Tim pool said it best in his tweet.

“this documentary Died Suddenly is a conspiracy

all these embalmers and doctors clearly got together to lie about this stuff happening to trick people into not getting vaccinated”

Expand full comment
Stevanovitch's avatar

Facetiously, of course. Tim’s the real deal( usually) and engages many younger and mid-age folk.

Expand full comment
Sarah's avatar

The entire "documentary" is a psy-op, way-easily debunked, designed to make those of us who will never take the vax look ridiculous. Unfortunately it's working:

https://bartoll.se/2022/11/stew-peters-died-suddenly-psy-op/

https://bartoll.se/2022/10/blood-clots-in-dead-people/

Expand full comment
Evil Harry's avatar

No.

Just no.

Expand full comment
Deb Hawthorne's avatar

Seriously???

Expand full comment
Malignant's avatar

His post was sarcasm.

Expand full comment
San's avatar

Maybe the Babylon Bee will respond, too

At least the awake are aware of their sarcasm on the woke who are now dying or damaged at awful rates

Expand full comment
Sarah's avatar

The reason for this psy-op "documentary" is precisely because it is easily disproven. Go ask your local embalmer. He will tell you that those clots and white stringy things are the NORMAL result of a dead body being refrigerated for days. This b.s. presentation is a lie, designed to play on people's emotions, it is aimed directly at those of us who are against the vaccines - so what happens when we all share a video full of lies that we never bothered to check? We make ourselves look like idiots.

Expand full comment
Elliot Crown's avatar

Did YOU go ask your local embalmer if the clot story is fake? If so, please provide the embalmers name and address so we can fact check YOU.

Expand full comment
Celia Farber's avatar

Damn straight.

Expand full comment
Agent 1-4-9's avatar

Strange. I'm reading this at 11:19 pm. Eastern standard time and the Twitter post says 11;30 pm. From Europe maybe?

Expand full comment
Malignant's avatar

I see a lot of complaints about the movie.

Maybe we should crowdfund and crowdsource a documentary.

What kind of info would you present?

What should the gist of the script be?

How would YOU make the movie, so it couldn’t be debunked or labeled “controlled opposition.”

Expand full comment
JL DAY's avatar

I just watched the film and have also ready many of the comments on this post and elsewhere on social media. Yes, the Gates part early on in the film could have been elaborated upon, or even left out. But I do not feel that it influenced my view on the entire film either way. I am also cognizant that many do not trust Stew Peters. I too have my reservations about him and do not count on him for obtaining my info. In fact I have only watched a few of his videos. I do I think, however, that the film did a good job a showing, one part, of the issue. At the same time the film touched on the themes that we are all well aware. I also have read some others saying that this film could be a good intro to those who are less aware of the vax issues. Which I agree. I think that people are so wound up waiting in hope for the proverbial "silver-bullet" to end this madness that is being thrust upon humanity, that they expect perfection on all films, all the time. Rather, I think, that this imperfect film, is just one cog in the machinery in the construction of the universal truth that will, hopefully, bring on a greater awareness and enlightenment for the planet. Sadly, I feel that we are still only in the early stages in this battle to save humanity from the dark forces being thrust upon us. So lets keep on truckin'. Peace and love.

Expand full comment
Commoncents's avatar

Interesting how MSM can lie about EVERYTHING covid related but the minute a anti vax video appears even anti vaxxers will critique minutiae. Way to go people.

Expand full comment
San's avatar

Yup - because those of us who would DARE to even question the globa”lust” narrative & dictates- must have ALL of our arguments & presentations & information PERFECT!

Expand full comment
Sarah's avatar

And it's interesting how a bunch of patriots who should know better than to simply swallow some documentary whole without bothering to CHECK whether or not it's true, sit here and defend them as though God himself spoke it. Stew Peters has done this before. Remember the stupid "snake venom in the water" show he did? That also makes patriots look like morons. Same thing here. My links explain it in detail, including the fact that embalmers everywhere will tell you that the clots both dark and light are the normal result of dead bodies being refrigerated for days before the embalming process. We are in an information war, people. Wake up and protect your head space. Stop simply believing something because you want to.

Expand full comment
Commoncents's avatar

The BUNCH OF PATRIOTS part sounds like YOU PEOPLE. I have been CHECKING for almost three years. Get a clue SATAN

Expand full comment
Sarah's avatar

Emotional much? All this because I asked people to think? This is exactly the kind of black-and-white, hysterical reaction that we all need to guard against. You are doing nobody any favors by shrieking this way.

Expand full comment
INGRID C DURDEN's avatar

I think the banning then lifting the ban, and the misleading comment, will make the film even MORE viewed than less. Because forbid a child to do something and what will happen... right.

Expand full comment