Megyn Kelly Regrets Getting DEATHVAX™ After Receiving VAIDS (‘Autoimmune Issue’) Diagnosis
We have only just begun...
SEP 8 [This text is from “2nd Smartest Guy In The World’s Substack, linked here.]
At this stage of the global eugenics game only the profoundly brainwashed “Trust the Science” zealots continue to bury their proverbial heads in the sand.
We have irrefutable proof that the more slow kill bioweapon servings one is administered, the greater the risk of death and disease.
And now we have a public figure admitting the horrifying truth about a “vaccine” that could never inoculate against respiratory disease, nor attenuate viral symptoms; but, rather, this Modified mRNA poison induces all of the symptoms at far deadlier severities; to wit:
Megyn Kelly’s IFR (infection fatality rate) was around zero IF she were not subjected to the “vaccine,” but because she is now genetically modified, and her immune system is severely compromised, her IFR is now far greater than zero. It is no wonder that she developed “COVID” shortly after her booster; in other words, instead of being protected from COVID, her VAIDS was expressed upon further contamination.
Now that she has VAIDS, a common cold can quite literally kill her.
This entire PSYOP-19 program stands as the greatest crime against humanity in history. And we are on the eve of the followup PSYOP-23 scheme, with the associated MK Ultra masking, lockdowns, and never-ending DEATHVAX™ offerings.
The only things that can potentially save someone like Megyn Kelly from her ‘autoimmune’ diagnosis are protocols such as this:
Synergistic pairing of ivermectin and fenbendazole found HIGHLY EFFECTIVE at preventing and treating cancer
JUL 2
Do NOT comply.
And her older sister died eleven months ago after her heart suddenly and unexpectedly attacked her.
I read a Tweet (assume it is real) from her in the spring of 2021 in which she advocated for getting the vax because she was a journalist and we should trust our doctors. This is not to dismiss what happened to her and believe she deserved the outcome. It just exemplifies Dr. Christina Parks' statement that those with p.hds and those at the lowest on the educational totem pole were both reluctant to get it. Those with the highest, because they knew what they knew, and those on the lowest, because they knew what they didn't know. So one side you have the empirical and the other intuition. As a fellow animal on the plant, I veer towards intuition.