Text Of Protest Letter By German Scientist, Briefly Published By The Lancet, Calling It "Wrong And Dangerous" To Spread The Lie That Covid Spread Is Driven By The Unvaccinated

Cites "Increasing Evidence" ...That "Vaccinated Individuals Continue To Have A Relevant Role In Transmission."

“When an entire society, particularly its professions, radically transforms the meanings of right and wrong and then lives by those inverted meanings as part of normal day-to-day events, they cannot be excused from accepting responsibility for the consequences of their actions.”

Life Unworthy Of Life: Racial Phobia And Mass Murder In Hitler’s Germany,

—James M. Glass


Many friends are staggering around stunned that friends and family canceled Christmas gatherings “because of Omicron.” I am unable to “process” this.

Here’s a piano dropped from a 7th floor window, something I’ve been meaning to tell you all, which I learned about via Dave Rasnick, perhaps a week ago. I’ll just skip all the framing and tell you straight:

There are over six million “variants” of “SARS Cov 2.”

Email from Dr. Dave Rasnick, December 13:

”Next time somebody talks about a COVID variant pandemic, show this:

As of today, there are 6,031,036 genome sequences of SARS-CoV-2 (alias hCoV-19), and growing. 

GISAID "Enabling rapid and open access to epidemic and pandemic virus data”

https://www.gisaid.org/index.php

Raz “

Will these links enable you to come home for Christmas?

No. They don’t care. They don’t have to.

On the other hand, we who are not afraid of either “the virus,” “the variant,” or people, are a persecuted minority who live outside of society, shunned and shamed. We live with the expectation of escalating hatred, re-cast as virtue, driven by blind cultural psychosis known as “saving lives.”

Ever get the feeling they want us dead?

They celebrate this concept, openly, the good people.

We are hated, for still believing, amidst such dirty, angry contagion mania, that love must be remembered. We are hated for still believing that as humans, we need at least some measure of intra-human contact. For believing that getting together on holidays is something normal. They’ve even co-opted the word “normal,” which now has a strange dark tint.

Our kind shrink, fall silent, cower. We try to talk around it. (Not me, personally; Fortunately, I don’t have this conflict with living family members, or dead ones for that matter. This I was, at least, spared.)

We are afraid too. Not of death by “virus” (we all understand the quotation marks by now,) but of the advancing sterilization of the ponds we live in. We know nothing will ever be sterile enough, for this Covid Lynch mob.

We are not pathogens, we are human beings. But they, are always over us, always superior; We always have to walk around the edge of the schoolyard and consider it a good day if no rock hits us in the head. Their fear runs everything, rules and dictates, demands to consume and express more and more and more; It is an incarnated dark spirit, with an insatiable appetite for sterility. Its food is killing off human life, needs, hopes , and togethernesses. And still it is never happy.

Shall we offer to cremate ourselves and then present at Christmas dinner in an urn?

Is that an “inappropriate” sentence, for the enlightened worried well who are only trying to protect themselves from death, as they would have it?

I’m ANGRY.

I’m tired of “trying to understand” them. Tired of watching friends internalize the pain of these virtuous rejections, these “normal” families acting quietly psychotic. It’s not our fault they are biologically illiterate and have entered a mass psychosis—that they have read not one line of the true history of disease and its causes or solutions. You can’t even say “terrain theory” to them. They don’t even have to know that they are expressing a moribund body of quack epidemiology, long since “discredited” to use their favorite weapon-word.

But everything we try to do is de-facto shameful, since they are the self-declared dominating cult of safety. We must submit to them—they never have to submit to us. The medical term for this, one of them, is “traumatizing narcissism.” (To overtake the rights of another by force, to not even consider any democratic methods for discerning reality, to act by fiat and dictat. By rage, entitlement, exclusion, ghosting, and abuse. And then to declare that self-evident and good. One is meant to be grateful for their “patience,” now “wearing thin.” What about our patience? Since we are the permanent underclass, that’s not a thing.

We do not exist.

They profusely issue politically correct antipathy in a vortex of vile propaganda pretending to be “science.”

We are always the paper to the scissors, the scissors to the rock, and the rock to the paper.

We are not a “side,” not a body of evidence.

We are disappeared before we utter anything.

Un-persons.

Never mind that we are consistently correct, while they are jaw-droopingly ill-informed.

So today I am issuing a letter to every American family who has partaken in this abuse of family members: It is a letter they won’t receive, won’t read, but I write it for the rejected ones. An imaginary letter we can imagine they would read. And it goes like this: “Dear Mom and Dad, you think you are being right and good by believing Gates funded propaganda channels and telling me not to come home for Christmas unless I have triple injected myself, “tested” myself (on a meaningless “test”) and then masked myself, as a tacit concession that none of the aforementioned actions actually work. But I’m the crazy one. I want to tell you thing.

Just one thing.

A German scientist has called your position”wrong and dangerous” invoking dark chapters of both US and German history, and we all know what he means. He did this in The Lancet. Yes, it really happened. Before it un-happened. His name is Gunter Kampf, he is at the University of Greifswald, and this is what he published, citing scientific data, before it was “withdrawn” by the usual suspects:

“In the USA and Germany, high-level officials have used the term pandemic of the unvaccinated, suggesting that people who have been vaccinated are not relevant in the epidemiology of COVID-19. Officials’ use of this phrase might have encouraged one scientist to claim that “the unvaccinated threaten the vaccinated for COVID-19”.

1But this view is far too simple.

There is increasing evidence that vaccinated individuals continue to have a relevant role in transmission. In Massachusetts, USA, a total of 469 new COVID-19 cases were detected during various events in July, 2021, and 346 (74%) of these cases were in people who were fully or partly vaccinated, 274 (79%) of whom were symptomatic. Cycle threshold values were similarly low between people who were fully vaccinated (median 22·8) and people who were unvaccinated, not fully vaccinated, or whose vaccination status was unknown (median 21·5), indicating a high viral load even among people who were fully vaccinated.2 In the USA, a total of 10 262 COVID-19 cases were reported in vaccinated people by April 30, 2021, of whom 2725 (26·6%) were asymptomatic, 995 (9·7%) were hospitalised, and 160 (1·6%) died.3 In Germany, 55·4% of symptomatic COVID-19 cases in patients aged 60 years or older were in fully vaccinated individuals,4and this proportion is increasing each week. In Münster, Germany, new cases of COVID-19 occurred in at least 85 (22%) of 380 people who were fully vaccinated or who had recovered from COVID-19 and who attended a nightclub.5 People who are vaccinated have a lower risk of severe disease but are still a relevant part of the pandemic. It is therefore wrong and dangerous to speak of a pandemic of the unvaccinated. Historically, both the USA and Germany have engendered negative experiences by stigmatising parts of the population for their skin colour or religion. I call on high-level officials and scientists to stop the inappropriate stigmatisation of unvaccinated people, who include our patients, colleagues, and other fellow citizens, and to put extra effort into bringing society together.”

The vanished article in The Lancet article, here.

I found another text by Gunter Kampf online in German, and translated it online. It read in translation:

”The freedom of science is not doing well. Their independence, financed by the state, is usually a great advantage as long as the state has no own interest in the outcome. But in the COVID-19 pandemic, this no longer seems to apply to individual questions. For example, scientific publications on masks have been devalued or withdrawn for flimsy reasons. Public criticism of selected measures comes mainly from academics outside the civil service. So-called fact checkers declared reports on individual scientific publications as "harmful content". Politicians put open pressure on scientists if they do not support the course of the rulers. And the Leopoldina describes a document as a science, which in no way corresponds to the international requirements for evidence-based recommendations. Why is that? Using selected examples, it is shown in a comprehensible manner why the civil service may represent a conflict of interest with regard to individual issues. Science can only be free again if it publicly maintains its distance from state authorities, calls for controversial debates and continually scrutinizes political decisions and their justifications in a critical and open-minded manner on their scientific foundations.”

—Gunter Kampf

Excellent coverage by UnCoverDc here.

I’m not doing well today.

I want to be a mountain of strength but today, I’m allowing myself to just feel and express my disgust at this trans-humanist rot passing itself off as public health heroica.

There’s nothing heroic about you who reject your families to “protect” yourselves. If we were your gay sons and this was the 1980s, and you decided to secretly throw out all the plates after Christmas dinner so your other children didn’t “catch" AIDS,” you would at least be ashamed. There would at least be anguished short stories by award winning writers in The New Yorker, lamenting your homophobia, which was how contagion mania was understood, then.

“They lived by a different kind of morality, involving the German biomedical vision that justified killing in the interests of preserving the blood and genetic integrity of the Volk. In the words of Rudolph Hoess, commandant of Auschwitz, “National Socialism is nothing but applied biology.

This ideological/psychological construction, deriving from the obsession with racial hygiene, lay behind the Nazis political vision of purifying the nation through the Holocaust. This is a psychotic interpretation of reality taking hold of the imagination of an entire society. In individual psychosis the self may generate hate-defined constructs and project inviolable interpretations of reality; consciousness creates bizarre realities that represent complete breaks with consensual reality….It was not by chance this fear of infection and disintegration came to be linked to the Jewish presence….The majority of the attendees at the Wannsee conference, at which the strategy of the Final Solution was explained, had advanced degrees.”

Life Unworthy Of Life: Racial Phobia And Mass Murder In Hitler’s Germany, James M. Glass,

pp 31-33

Is it a co-incidence, or is it significant, that Dr. Kampf is German?

And how about that name?

Kampf.

[Thanks to Paul Cadwaller, for drawing this event, which happened and un-happened in November, 2021, to my attention.]