In 2011, he twitted “National Biodefense Science Board (NBSB) has now voted to recommend AVA (Biothrax) anthrax vaccine testing in pediatric population.” 1 This defies many human rights: you cannot under any circumstance experiment on healthy children (like they did with the COVID shots). Needless to say that vax poison completely failed and harmed those children. No retraction from Malone.
By 2014 he was an depopulation fanatic (masons or their mercenaries, are usually depop-nazis), when commenting “The world is becoming more violent. Here are the most and least peaceful countries”, he twitted “yet another predictable consequence of unchecked global population growth.”
There’s no overpopulation, not only because well developed humans contribute more than they use but also because births are shrinking year after year. More problematic of his lack of common sense on that topic, is that he is calling for policies against unchecked population: not a single one of them has been done without violating basic human rights and freedoms… especially informed consent (typical violation by the COVID shots, which by the way were sucessful in Malone’s goal of checking global population growth), yet Malone calls himself a freedom fighter (!) and of course, never retracted.
Worked under Fauci at the National Institute of Allergies and Infectious Diseases (NIAID). He has a long record in the bioweapons complex (10 billion dollars in grants 2012-2017 2):
“I have historically worked with people who have been truly Deep State intelligence community. I have decades of experience in biodefense. I have been deep in the belly of the beast. I have won literally billions of dollars for my clients in grants and contracts. I have managed hundreds of millions of dollars in grants and contracts in the vaccine space.” 3
Dr. Malone “the original inventor of mRNA vaccination as a technology, DNA vaccination, and multiple non-viral DNA and RNA/mRNA platform delivery technologies. He holds numerous fundamental domestic and foreign patents in the fields of gene delivery, delivery formulations, and vaccines, including for fundamental DNA and RNA/mRNA vaccine technologies.” 4
Does Malone receive royalties from Pfizer and Moderna for any of his 57 mRNA patents5, some of which are essential for lipid nanoparticles (there are 1814 patents related to Malone and nanoparticles)? Couldn’t he block them from using his patents in making haccines? US patents expire in 20 years: how many of those are still valid? If he could have blocked vax manufacturers, wouldn’t he be accomplice to genocide? By denying this without giving reasons, he left the accusations open.
Some ask: is it legal and ethical to appropriate patents, when the funding came from the taxpayer and is supposed to benefit the taxpayer, not the researcher who cashed his wage?
It’s like a physicist who worked in the Manhattan Project, the U.S. government research project (1942–45) that produced the first atomic bombs, alleging that he didn’t know his theoretical and practical knowledge would be weaponized, even though he was hired by the military and knew it could be weaponized. Worse if his patents could have stopped the bombing of Nagasaki and Hiroshima. All those lives would be in his conscience.
April 2021. He said he took 2nd Moderna shot: “almost did me in. As in I almost died.” Some say that it is strange that Malone says he got vaccinated after getting COVID: why wouldn’t an expert like him rely on natural immunity and repurposed drugs? Why would he take an EUA experiment, having worked for decades with mRNA for the Department of Defence and CIA, and knowing the failure in cancer patients and the risk of ADE? He said he was expecting the EU to require it but it wasn’t required back then (took without coercion!) and hoped the vax would (magically?) kill his post-COVID cough (!). He almost died, yet he didn’t warn everybody in the interviews to avoid this huge risk until … 13 Jan 2022 ? 6 Not in Puerto Rico 3 Oct 2021 or Hawaii 18 Oct 2021.7
24 Jun 2021 Malone twitted supporting traitor Andrew Hill calling for more evidence on ivermectin (there were thousands of proven cases along a year and there was no harm trying!): “PLEASE pay attention to Dr. Andrew Hill. He is a very solid and mature data scientist. We speak often, and I have complete confidence in him and his team. Evidence-based medicine, not hype.” Malone was replied: “Sorry Dr. Malone, you must have missed Tess Lawrie statement around her private conversation with Dr. Hill where he admitted pressure from sponsors was the cause of his bogus conclusions.“ 12 Malone didn’t answer, maybe he didn’t read it and wasn’t aware of Hill’s 180° change towards the anti-ivermectin genocide. He surely supported ivermectin afterwards.
In early 2022 he was still supporting vaccinating the elderly and high risk, while working for a Bio-defence contract. 13 It seems he never gave a public apology.
He sued freedom fighters like the Breggins, Dr. Peter McCullough (America Out Loud) and Dr. Jane Ruby for 25 million dollars each, instead of leading a class action against the social media that censored him and millions (Twitter, Linkedin, etc.). 14
He attacked Harvey Risch, MD; Judy Mikovits, MD; Paul Alexander, Ph.D.; and The Wellness Company.15
Some argue that this is exactly what a false flag does: block anyone contesting his official narrative. For instance, the Breggins were criticizing Mattias Desmet’s mass formation theory: “The Desmet/Malone Ideology of Mass Psychosis Blames the Citizens and Not the Global Predators“.16 On the contrary, Malone has leaded global congresses in many countries, where he accused global corruption. Still, he refuses to mention “conspiracy”. By suing and not giving explanations, Malone left the accusations open.
If you search for the word “conspiracy” in Malone’s substack, you’ll only find disbelief in such reality. For example, he reposted Desmet, who lays the burden on the people, not the oppressors/predators. Either Malone and Desmet were fooled or they are trying to fool us... into the magical belief that this is a spontaneous yet coordinated process across nations and that there’s nothing else to do except talking us to extermination. Some argue that Malone is the fooled and Desmet is the fooler because he uses half truths to structure a lie. Yet, he might just be a fooled, repeating structured foolishness.
9 Jan 2023. Musk Twitter was still censoring and shadow banning COVID posts and refused to reinstate many accounts from truthers, yet Twitter reinstated Malone’s account (with many others like Kirsch and McCullough). According to Dr. Ruby’s screenshots 17, Twitter blocked her for posting “What is The Malone Doctrine?”: why would Twitter support Malone by banning Dr. Ruby?:
2 Feb 2023. Malone called for a ban on mRNA and DNA COVID injections ... 3 years too late: by Jan 2020, Malone had published a paper showing that, the same as with SARS-Cov-1 and MERS where they caused ADE in animal testing, they were too dangerous for humans, even experimentally: because of the ADE risk, they should thoroughly be tested on animals. 18 He never mentioned this study until accused by the Breggins in Feb 2023.
“He didn't come forward expressing remorse, as lots of great inventors have done before him,19 rueing their sometimes literally earth-shaking inventions, from the atom bomb20 and the Kalishnakov, to the office cubicle and the labradoodle. Notably, as of June 2023, "The History of mRNA Vaccines" still unfolds under a spray of lovely pink blossoms on Malone's website.21” 22
8 Jun 2023. “In some cases I have proceeded to delivering a cease and desist and that was enough. Dr. Richard Fleming was one such case. I sent him a letter, and he stopped… if I win a case, this will become a disincentive for those prone to this sort of behavior in the future, directed towards me or to others… Spreading hate can be quite lucrative in the age of the internet, where attention seeking behavior can be monetized.” 23
Comment: no mention of the scientific dissent causing his lawsuit. Using the “hatred” argument is an ad hominem fallacy proving lack of arguments of the self-victimized.
Will soon publish more in my subs!
In the meantime, read this, it's important:
16 laws we need to exit Prison Planet
Politics got us in, politics is the way out ... after prayers!
It's an honor Ginger! I was planning to publish it as an article, soon. In the meantime, I'm sending you to your subs email all I've got. gingerbreggin , right?
Thanks. You highlighted some really great points from the Diana West article. I always tried to give Malone the benefit of the doubt, but as Celia says, that is getting harder and harder to do.
Robert Malone did Not tweet Anything in 2014. He did not have twitter then. There Are screenshots out there of his twitter picture with previous dates and things he did not say. This is important to understand.
I've always felt the amount Malone sued for is obscene. I will listen to what Diana West has to say. But also, please consider this from Meryl Nass - (She has been researching medical malfeasance since she volunteered with Physicians for Social Responsibility in the 1980's. She was following the lies of the covid narrative from the beginning, her integrity is clear, and as she knows Malone personally, I think her take on this should be considered also) -
thank you for taking this on- i've been defending the breggins- my heroes- across many substacks for quite some time. I'd like to know why people let malone slide- as if he didn't know about mrna crossing the blood brain barrier- and how much $$$$$$$ he has garnered in this entire catastrophe- he is a taint on bobby kennedy's team- and should be removed- pronto-
In 2011, he twitted “National Biodefense Science Board (NBSB) has now voted to recommend AVA (Biothrax) anthrax vaccine testing in pediatric population.” 1 This defies many human rights: you cannot under any circumstance experiment on healthy children (like they did with the COVID shots). Needless to say that vax poison completely failed and harmed those children. No retraction from Malone.
By 2014 he was an depopulation fanatic (masons or their mercenaries, are usually depop-nazis), when commenting “The world is becoming more violent. Here are the most and least peaceful countries”, he twitted “yet another predictable consequence of unchecked global population growth.”
There’s no overpopulation, not only because well developed humans contribute more than they use but also because births are shrinking year after year. More problematic of his lack of common sense on that topic, is that he is calling for policies against unchecked population: not a single one of them has been done without violating basic human rights and freedoms… especially informed consent (typical violation by the COVID shots, which by the way were sucessful in Malone’s goal of checking global population growth), yet Malone calls himself a freedom fighter (!) and of course, never retracted.
Worked under Fauci at the National Institute of Allergies and Infectious Diseases (NIAID). He has a long record in the bioweapons complex (10 billion dollars in grants 2012-2017 2):
“I have historically worked with people who have been truly Deep State intelligence community. I have decades of experience in biodefense. I have been deep in the belly of the beast. I have won literally billions of dollars for my clients in grants and contracts. I have managed hundreds of millions of dollars in grants and contracts in the vaccine space.” 3
Dr. Malone “the original inventor of mRNA vaccination as a technology, DNA vaccination, and multiple non-viral DNA and RNA/mRNA platform delivery technologies. He holds numerous fundamental domestic and foreign patents in the fields of gene delivery, delivery formulations, and vaccines, including for fundamental DNA and RNA/mRNA vaccine technologies.” 4
Does Malone receive royalties from Pfizer and Moderna for any of his 57 mRNA patents5, some of which are essential for lipid nanoparticles (there are 1814 patents related to Malone and nanoparticles)? Couldn’t he block them from using his patents in making haccines? US patents expire in 20 years: how many of those are still valid? If he could have blocked vax manufacturers, wouldn’t he be accomplice to genocide? By denying this without giving reasons, he left the accusations open.
Some ask: is it legal and ethical to appropriate patents, when the funding came from the taxpayer and is supposed to benefit the taxpayer, not the researcher who cashed his wage?
It’s like a physicist who worked in the Manhattan Project, the U.S. government research project (1942–45) that produced the first atomic bombs, alleging that he didn’t know his theoretical and practical knowledge would be weaponized, even though he was hired by the military and knew it could be weaponized. Worse if his patents could have stopped the bombing of Nagasaki and Hiroshima. All those lives would be in his conscience.
April 2021. He said he took 2nd Moderna shot: “almost did me in. As in I almost died.” Some say that it is strange that Malone says he got vaccinated after getting COVID: why wouldn’t an expert like him rely on natural immunity and repurposed drugs? Why would he take an EUA experiment, having worked for decades with mRNA for the Department of Defence and CIA, and knowing the failure in cancer patients and the risk of ADE? He said he was expecting the EU to require it but it wasn’t required back then (took without coercion!) and hoped the vax would (magically?) kill his post-COVID cough (!). He almost died, yet he didn’t warn everybody in the interviews to avoid this huge risk until … 13 Jan 2022 ? 6 Not in Puerto Rico 3 Oct 2021 or Hawaii 18 Oct 2021.7
24 Jun 2021 Malone twitted supporting traitor Andrew Hill calling for more evidence on ivermectin (there were thousands of proven cases along a year and there was no harm trying!): “PLEASE pay attention to Dr. Andrew Hill. He is a very solid and mature data scientist. We speak often, and I have complete confidence in him and his team. Evidence-based medicine, not hype.” Malone was replied: “Sorry Dr. Malone, you must have missed Tess Lawrie statement around her private conversation with Dr. Hill where he admitted pressure from sponsors was the cause of his bogus conclusions.“ 12 Malone didn’t answer, maybe he didn’t read it and wasn’t aware of Hill’s 180° change towards the anti-ivermectin genocide. He surely supported ivermectin afterwards.
In early 2022 he was still supporting vaccinating the elderly and high risk, while working for a Bio-defence contract. 13 It seems he never gave a public apology.
He sued freedom fighters like the Breggins, Dr. Peter McCullough (America Out Loud) and Dr. Jane Ruby for 25 million dollars each, instead of leading a class action against the social media that censored him and millions (Twitter, Linkedin, etc.). 14
He attacked Harvey Risch, MD; Judy Mikovits, MD; Paul Alexander, Ph.D.; and The Wellness Company.15
Some argue that this is exactly what a false flag does: block anyone contesting his official narrative. For instance, the Breggins were criticizing Mattias Desmet’s mass formation theory: “The Desmet/Malone Ideology of Mass Psychosis Blames the Citizens and Not the Global Predators“.16 On the contrary, Malone has leaded global congresses in many countries, where he accused global corruption. Still, he refuses to mention “conspiracy”. By suing and not giving explanations, Malone left the accusations open.
If you search for the word “conspiracy” in Malone’s substack, you’ll only find disbelief in such reality. For example, he reposted Desmet, who lays the burden on the people, not the oppressors/predators. Either Malone and Desmet were fooled or they are trying to fool us... into the magical belief that this is a spontaneous yet coordinated process across nations and that there’s nothing else to do except talking us to extermination. Some argue that Malone is the fooled and Desmet is the fooler because he uses half truths to structure a lie. Yet, he might just be a fooled, repeating structured foolishness.
9 Jan 2023. Musk Twitter was still censoring and shadow banning COVID posts and refused to reinstate many accounts from truthers, yet Twitter reinstated Malone’s account (with many others like Kirsch and McCullough). According to Dr. Ruby’s screenshots 17, Twitter blocked her for posting “What is The Malone Doctrine?”: why would Twitter support Malone by banning Dr. Ruby?:
2 Feb 2023. Malone called for a ban on mRNA and DNA COVID injections ... 3 years too late: by Jan 2020, Malone had published a paper showing that, the same as with SARS-Cov-1 and MERS where they caused ADE in animal testing, they were too dangerous for humans, even experimentally: because of the ADE risk, they should thoroughly be tested on animals. 18 He never mentioned this study until accused by the Breggins in Feb 2023.
“He didn't come forward expressing remorse, as lots of great inventors have done before him,19 rueing their sometimes literally earth-shaking inventions, from the atom bomb20 and the Kalishnakov, to the office cubicle and the labradoodle. Notably, as of June 2023, "The History of mRNA Vaccines" still unfolds under a spray of lovely pink blossoms on Malone's website.21” 22
8 Jun 2023. “In some cases I have proceeded to delivering a cease and desist and that was enough. Dr. Richard Fleming was one such case. I sent him a letter, and he stopped… if I win a case, this will become a disincentive for those prone to this sort of behavior in the future, directed towards me or to others… Spreading hate can be quite lucrative in the age of the internet, where attention seeking behavior can be monetized.” 23
Comment: no mention of the scientific dissent causing his lawsuit. Using the “hatred” argument is an ad hominem fallacy proving lack of arguments of the self-victimized.
Will soon publish more in my subs!
In the meantime, read this, it's important:
16 laws we need to exit Prison Planet
Politics got us in, politics is the way out ... after prayers!
I don’t trust Malone, he’s too polished and made the vaccine technology while making tons of money from it. Perhaps this was his mission all along, to cause more speech restrictions. He also claims he took the vaccine. That sounds pretty moronic knowing what he does about that industry. He knew they only made one mrna come to market by 2020 and it was a million dollars a dose. This is the same with Trump forcing warp speed. He bypassed regulations and now there seems to be no quality control for the countless number of shots they have in the works.
Agreed he even tries to claim he had long covid yet was around doing interviews without any signs of an illness. Victor Davis Hanson had it and he was down for quite some time and just recently recovered after a long battle and many types of intervention
Where is your proof he made tons of money and made the COVID vaxxx technology. He experimented with the idea decades ago and had nothing to do with actual vaxxx rolled-out. The actual developers DENY he had anything to do with the actual vaxxxx!
https://patents.justia.com/inventor/robert-w-malone. There is the list of his patents. Is he being sued for the words out of his own mouth that he owned the patents and sold them? He also says they altered his technology nor does he deny he worked on a team. Patents are held by the pharmaceutical puppets. Edison denied lots of people’s claims they invented the products he sold. He could be an Edison type, but he knows medicine way better then Edison knew electric. I guess knowing when someone is bullshitting or telling the truth is harder for some than others. They have to tell the truth on certain things or you wouldn’t listen at all. He wasn’t wrong about the shots doing harm. Most of his content I don’t question from following these things for many years and hours a day, my job allows me that luxury. I question his motivations
If the techniques he patented were key in the development of the actual vaxxx he should have got paid. That doesn't make him responsible for lack of testing of the actual formulation distributed. I don't get your point.
If someone could have patented the internal combustion engine, that wouldn't make such person responsible for every auto accident due to failed brakes.
The auto industry and the pharmaceutical industry are two different animals. He was paid for his delivery system and handsomely according to him. He also said they altered what was created. I never said I’m blaming him for the vaccine, but Oppenheimer knew he was the dealer of death after what he created. As the creator it’s convenient for him to show up and make claims (tho many true)that are leading to censorship. When actual whistleblowers come out they disappear or have to go to Russia. Cautious skepticism on everything is my point
Oppenheimer was ridiculous. If he hadn't brought the bomb forward someone else would have, perhaps for an even more ruthless power. At least A and H Bombs haven't been used since WWII.
The lipid nanotech he apparently pioneered can carry ANYTHING (also nano) into a cell, good, bad or indifferent. Malone didn't even work on a vaxxx for corona viruses to the best of my knowledge. If someone invents the hand gun for self defense, you can't blame him for stickup men.
I would like to have heard by now some reflections from Dr. Malone concerning his thoughts when he decided to help pioneer the process of genetically modifying people with the object of improving the human genome. What role, if any, did Dr. Malone have in coming up with the phrase "gene therapy," a calculated PR term if ever there was one. What was "therapeutic" about introducing a process of genetic alteration falsely advertised as a remedy for COVID-19? Given his DOD connections and involvements, wouldn't Dr. Malone probably have had from the start some inkling of the lead role of the US military, a role we are learning about from analysis of the Brook Jackson case as put forward by Latypova, Watts and others?
No. Your points are without foundation. For instance, some people have genes, allegedly, that make them susceptible to a particular disease or condtion. Altering or eliminating that gene might be beneficial. He had nothing to do with the COVID19 vaxxx AT ALL other than to suggest the technology might be valuable for vaccinations.
Dr. Malone introduced himself by announcing he was one of the inventors of the so-called "gene therapy" that, with the addition of lipid nanoparticles, was deployed to.....???.. not even stop the spread of COVID-19. So then, why was the genetic-alteration procedure deployed? You might be OK Lloyd Miller with GMO seeds and food and now GMO humans. I'm not OK with any of those things. Who can improve on God's design for life? Human life-- all life-- is sacred. Now will we be force-fed to accept mRNA gene manipulations for every disease because the jab was "so effective at stopping COVID-19." We need to speak up loudly against the supposed precedent that no consent is necessary for doing medical experiments, but especially genetic experiments, on human subjects.
The simple question I keep coming back to is: why in hell is Malone suing someone whom pharma-- and the globalists-- would love to smack up a bit??? Hello? It makes zero sense, and no, I do not trust that man.
What we're really up against is a massive censorship/propaganda campaign. This is the true beginning of totalitarianism. Remember that.
The lawsuit = censorship. Censorship is the enemy. Who is Robert Malone, that he's so keen to censor someone exposing the globalist agenda???
Desmet figures in the lawsuit. Desmet talks nonsense.
We need to get clear on this: Desmet is distracting us from the fundamental nature of totalitarianism, which is censorship/propaganda. Malone supports Desmet. Malone wants to censor Breggin who is critical of, and has exposed, Desmet. There are others supporting Desmet, and my conclusion about that is: either they don't understand what he's saying or else they themselves are supporting the narrative that everything is our own fault for our "mechanistic thinking." This narrative is very likely a psychological operation to distract us from the massive censorship/propaganda campaign.
Getting the picture??
Totalitarianism does NOT begin with our "mechanistic thinking." It begins with the state/globalist alliance engaging in massive propaganda and censorship in order to set forward a single narrative that can't be questioned: the exact opposite of freedom of speech and thought.
Desmet’s whole point is the globalists can’t do anything at all without the complicity of the 95%. There have always been and will always be megalomaniacs bent on world domination. It’s up to the people to disavow their power.
The globalists manufacture the complicity: they manufacture the consent. They know how to do this, of course. This is the nature of censorship/propaganda.
In order for people to disavow the power of the globalists the people have to understand what's going on, right? How can they understand if the information they're getting is steering them toward a certain narrative and alternative information is censored? Isn't that what's happening?
The whole Desmet/Malone thing is dangerous and insidious. They want us to blame it on the stupid idiots who can't think for themselves, don't they? They want us to look away from the very source of their power, which is censorship/propaganda. They want to sell us a narrative: they're steering us into accepting the narrative they want us to believe.
Notice what Desmet says about any "steering" (nudging) the globalists are doing. He says it's impersonal in nature and due to our own propensity for mechanistic thinking. No, it's not impersonal at all: it's very deliberate and planned, and I can't help but think that Desmet is very much a part of this steering. Not that he's a bad person, but perhaps he's been compromised or perhaps he really isn't that careful a thinker and was influenced by the wrong people.
Let me be clear: I don't think Malone and Desmet are bad people. But something is seriously wrong here. Good people can make bad decisions. We all make mistakes. For us to refuse to see this, though, is adding fuel to the censorship/propaganda machine. This is what the globalists want: they want their narrative.
Yeah, but Desmet studiously avoids saying there's an internationally coordinated conspiracy. Instead, he weaves a complex tissue of word salad implying this organic miasma of mass formation. When Malone first bruited it about, I detected that its function is to deflect FROM conspiracy by supplying an alternative explanation for the mass of phenomena that otherwise reasonable people would infer reflects a conspiracy.
Conspiracies, like megalomaniacs bent on world domination, abound. According to Desmet, 30% of the population are susceptible to the lies, while 65% are too chickenshit to contest them. It is up to the remaining 5% to speak up.
Aw Celia, I get it! I’m conflict-averse too and recently waking up to the effects of my childhood trauma on my adult brain and responses to people. Thoroughly enjoy your posts here. Thank you!
Great write-up of the situation by West. The guy seems to have flipped his lid; either that or he's a gaslighting narcissist. I think the latter fits best.
Malone has quite an interesting history. A very smart person once said, “Be wary of someone whom you’ve never seen nor heard of, is then all of a sudden.... everywhere!” That’s Robert Malone. Pretending to be a hero now when he had much to do with suppressing Alternative C treatments and pushed Remdesivir along the way.
On the contrary, Malone was pushing "re-purposed" drugs to fight the alleged COVID19 and was very critical of Fauci approach. I never heard of him push Remdesivir. Source?
Some people -- even some otherwise intelligent people -- think that controlled opposition must come in vivid purple jumpsuits and neon lights flashing "Look at me! I'm controlled opposition!" Apparently, they've never thought that if there is a conspiracy, the conspirators would use their wealth and power to infiltrate any nascent counter-movement that might arise in society -- like, say, an anti-vaxx movement; and that this infiltration would use people who seem to be on our side. DUH.
Ha…risk averse…you took on the entire establishment, when few understood or cared because it didn’t affect their lives. Today there is so much dis/mis information being flung around on all sides, it is hard to keep up with one’s own thoughts. Malone left me uncomfortable after listening to his chat with teenagers in Hawaii about vaccines. Something was decidedly off. The Breggins have been thoughtful, knowledgeable and sincere, I have been following Peter Breggin since the early 80’s and the message has always been a consistent one. This lawsuit makes no sense, since March of 2020 I keep looking for the rational, does it even exist?
You bring up something Malone said to some children in Hawaii about their getting the injection. He himself talked about it. I don't want to misquote, but when I read his dialog to those children it sent serious chills up my spine. I do not trust him.
Yes! That interview got under my skin...I had decided to watch it to be bolstered by a clear warning to the kids, but instead it was somehow eerily a plug for the shot givers. Can't remember the details, but remember I stopped watching because I found it so disturbing.
I am about to start organizing meetups/book readings, just need to find time, but very soon, small scale. I will ask soon where everybody lives and pick a spot most people can come to...
Re: "I wish I were less conflict averse"
You are a bridge-builder, Celia. Just like RFK. We need more, not less, people like you in the medical freedom tent. Thanks for everything you do.
The REAL Robert W. Malone, MD
In 2011, he twitted “National Biodefense Science Board (NBSB) has now voted to recommend AVA (Biothrax) anthrax vaccine testing in pediatric population.” 1 This defies many human rights: you cannot under any circumstance experiment on healthy children (like they did with the COVID shots). Needless to say that vax poison completely failed and harmed those children. No retraction from Malone.
By 2014 he was an depopulation fanatic (masons or their mercenaries, are usually depop-nazis), when commenting “The world is becoming more violent. Here are the most and least peaceful countries”, he twitted “yet another predictable consequence of unchecked global population growth.”
There’s no overpopulation, not only because well developed humans contribute more than they use but also because births are shrinking year after year. More problematic of his lack of common sense on that topic, is that he is calling for policies against unchecked population: not a single one of them has been done without violating basic human rights and freedoms… especially informed consent (typical violation by the COVID shots, which by the way were sucessful in Malone’s goal of checking global population growth), yet Malone calls himself a freedom fighter (!) and of course, never retracted.
Worked under Fauci at the National Institute of Allergies and Infectious Diseases (NIAID). He has a long record in the bioweapons complex (10 billion dollars in grants 2012-2017 2):
“I have historically worked with people who have been truly Deep State intelligence community. I have decades of experience in biodefense. I have been deep in the belly of the beast. I have won literally billions of dollars for my clients in grants and contracts. I have managed hundreds of millions of dollars in grants and contracts in the vaccine space.” 3
Dr. Malone “the original inventor of mRNA vaccination as a technology, DNA vaccination, and multiple non-viral DNA and RNA/mRNA platform delivery technologies. He holds numerous fundamental domestic and foreign patents in the fields of gene delivery, delivery formulations, and vaccines, including for fundamental DNA and RNA/mRNA vaccine technologies.” 4
Does Malone receive royalties from Pfizer and Moderna for any of his 57 mRNA patents5, some of which are essential for lipid nanoparticles (there are 1814 patents related to Malone and nanoparticles)? Couldn’t he block them from using his patents in making haccines? US patents expire in 20 years: how many of those are still valid? If he could have blocked vax manufacturers, wouldn’t he be accomplice to genocide? By denying this without giving reasons, he left the accusations open.
Some ask: is it legal and ethical to appropriate patents, when the funding came from the taxpayer and is supposed to benefit the taxpayer, not the researcher who cashed his wage?
It’s like a physicist who worked in the Manhattan Project, the U.S. government research project (1942–45) that produced the first atomic bombs, alleging that he didn’t know his theoretical and practical knowledge would be weaponized, even though he was hired by the military and knew it could be weaponized. Worse if his patents could have stopped the bombing of Nagasaki and Hiroshima. All those lives would be in his conscience.
April 2021. He said he took 2nd Moderna shot: “almost did me in. As in I almost died.” Some say that it is strange that Malone says he got vaccinated after getting COVID: why wouldn’t an expert like him rely on natural immunity and repurposed drugs? Why would he take an EUA experiment, having worked for decades with mRNA for the Department of Defence and CIA, and knowing the failure in cancer patients and the risk of ADE? He said he was expecting the EU to require it but it wasn’t required back then (took without coercion!) and hoped the vax would (magically?) kill his post-COVID cough (!). He almost died, yet he didn’t warn everybody in the interviews to avoid this huge risk until … 13 Jan 2022 ? 6 Not in Puerto Rico 3 Oct 2021 or Hawaii 18 Oct 2021.7
24 Jun 2021 Malone twitted supporting traitor Andrew Hill calling for more evidence on ivermectin (there were thousands of proven cases along a year and there was no harm trying!): “PLEASE pay attention to Dr. Andrew Hill. He is a very solid and mature data scientist. We speak often, and I have complete confidence in him and his team. Evidence-based medicine, not hype.” Malone was replied: “Sorry Dr. Malone, you must have missed Tess Lawrie statement around her private conversation with Dr. Hill where he admitted pressure from sponsors was the cause of his bogus conclusions.“ 12 Malone didn’t answer, maybe he didn’t read it and wasn’t aware of Hill’s 180° change towards the anti-ivermectin genocide. He surely supported ivermectin afterwards.
In early 2022 he was still supporting vaccinating the elderly and high risk, while working for a Bio-defence contract. 13 It seems he never gave a public apology.
He sued freedom fighters like the Breggins, Dr. Peter McCullough (America Out Loud) and Dr. Jane Ruby for 25 million dollars each, instead of leading a class action against the social media that censored him and millions (Twitter, Linkedin, etc.). 14
He attacked Harvey Risch, MD; Judy Mikovits, MD; Paul Alexander, Ph.D.; and The Wellness Company.15
Some argue that this is exactly what a false flag does: block anyone contesting his official narrative. For instance, the Breggins were criticizing Mattias Desmet’s mass formation theory: “The Desmet/Malone Ideology of Mass Psychosis Blames the Citizens and Not the Global Predators“.16 On the contrary, Malone has leaded global congresses in many countries, where he accused global corruption. Still, he refuses to mention “conspiracy”. By suing and not giving explanations, Malone left the accusations open.
If you search for the word “conspiracy” in Malone’s substack, you’ll only find disbelief in such reality. For example, he reposted Desmet, who lays the burden on the people, not the oppressors/predators. Either Malone and Desmet were fooled or they are trying to fool us... into the magical belief that this is a spontaneous yet coordinated process across nations and that there’s nothing else to do except talking us to extermination. Some argue that Malone is the fooled and Desmet is the fooler because he uses half truths to structure a lie. Yet, he might just be a fooled, repeating structured foolishness.
9 Jan 2023. Musk Twitter was still censoring and shadow banning COVID posts and refused to reinstate many accounts from truthers, yet Twitter reinstated Malone’s account (with many others like Kirsch and McCullough). According to Dr. Ruby’s screenshots 17, Twitter blocked her for posting “What is The Malone Doctrine?”: why would Twitter support Malone by banning Dr. Ruby?:
2 Feb 2023. Malone called for a ban on mRNA and DNA COVID injections ... 3 years too late: by Jan 2020, Malone had published a paper showing that, the same as with SARS-Cov-1 and MERS where they caused ADE in animal testing, they were too dangerous for humans, even experimentally: because of the ADE risk, they should thoroughly be tested on animals. 18 He never mentioned this study until accused by the Breggins in Feb 2023.
“He didn't come forward expressing remorse, as lots of great inventors have done before him,19 rueing their sometimes literally earth-shaking inventions, from the atom bomb20 and the Kalishnakov, to the office cubicle and the labradoodle. Notably, as of June 2023, "The History of mRNA Vaccines" still unfolds under a spray of lovely pink blossoms on Malone's website.21” 22
8 Jun 2023. “In some cases I have proceeded to delivering a cease and desist and that was enough. Dr. Richard Fleming was one such case. I sent him a letter, and he stopped… if I win a case, this will become a disincentive for those prone to this sort of behavior in the future, directed towards me or to others… Spreading hate can be quite lucrative in the age of the internet, where attention seeking behavior can be monetized.” 23
Comment: no mention of the scientific dissent causing his lawsuit. Using the “hatred” argument is an ad hominem fallacy proving lack of arguments of the self-victimized.
Will soon publish more in my subs!
In the meantime, read this, it's important:
16 laws we need to exit Prison Planet
Politics got us in, politics is the way out ... after prayers!
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/laws-to-exit-planet-prison
Thank you! This is Ginger Breggin. I would like to consult the footnotes you provide— are they available?
It's an honor Ginger! I was planning to publish it as an article, soon. In the meantime, I'm sending you to your subs email all I've got. gingerbreggin , right?
Thanks. You highlighted some really great points from the Diana West article. I always tried to give Malone the benefit of the doubt, but as Celia says, that is getting harder and harder to do.
Robert Malone did Not tweet Anything in 2014. He did not have twitter then. There Are screenshots out there of his twitter picture with previous dates and things he did not say. This is important to understand.
https://merylnass.substack.com/p/the-deep-state-attack-on-robert-malone?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=746368&post_id=112098076&isFreemail=true&token=eyJ1c2VyX2lkIjo2Njk5MjI1LCJwb3N0X2lkIjoxMTIwOTgwNzYsImlhdCI6MTY4MDM3NzE2MSwiZXhwIjoxNjgyOTY5MTYxLCJpc3MiOiJwdWItNzQ2MzY4Iiwic3ViIjoicG9zdC1yZWFjdGlvbiJ9.V2-MKNXyVYZKKtIm0Xr2rSIqsQyUS01mA-7DTns0urI
I've always felt the amount Malone sued for is obscene. I will listen to what Diana West has to say. But also, please consider this from Meryl Nass - (She has been researching medical malfeasance since she volunteered with Physicians for Social Responsibility in the 1980's. She was following the lies of the covid narrative from the beginning, her integrity is clear, and as she knows Malone personally, I think her take on this should be considered also) -
https://merylnass.substack.com/p/breggin-and-malone-analysis-and-suggested?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=746368&post_id=111883785&isFreemail=true&token=eyJ1c2VyX2lkIjo2Njk5MjI1LCJwb3N0X2lkIjoxMTE4ODM3ODUsImlhdCI6MTY4MDMxNjMwMSwiZXhwIjoxNjgyOTA4MzAxLCJpc3MiOiJwdWItNzQ2MzY4Iiwic3ViIjoicG9zdC1yZWFjdGlvbiJ9.62D9T6oJ4m2LkqJSzDw4_-jT7Gy7qZkXYHyM7tw3fMQ
https://merylnass.substack.com/p/malone-v-breggin?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=746368&post_id=107104171&isFreemail=true&token=eyJ1c2VyX2lkIjo2Njk5MjI1LCJwb3N0X2lkIjoxMDcxMDQxNzEsImlhdCI6MTY3ODI0NTgzMiwiZXhwIjoxNjgwODM3ODMyLCJpc3MiOiJwdWItNzQ2MzY4Iiwic3ViIjoicG9zdC1yZWFjdGlvbiJ9.2EMKdgcSIHfWss-wxJvGx2pUOivkHlNLfi02h8CrTLA
Why would they make fake twits from 2011, when he was part of the system? 2014?
He might not have been before, what he's turned into, now:
https://twitter.com/RWMaloneMD/status/479646933737545728
https://twitter.com/RWMaloneMD/status/130009283428483074
thank you for taking this on- i've been defending the breggins- my heroes- across many substacks for quite some time. I'd like to know why people let malone slide- as if he didn't know about mrna crossing the blood brain barrier- and how much $$$$$$$ he has garnered in this entire catastrophe- he is a taint on bobby kennedy's team- and should be removed- pronto-
So agree about Malone...and that he is “tainting Mr. Kennedy’s team”!
I agree. Tainting the team he is. I wonder why Meryll Nass defends Malone so much...
Me too
Bravo Celia! Beady-eyed psychopath Malone is a huge part of this Scamdemic puzzle.
The REAL Robert W. Malone, MD
In 2011, he twitted “National Biodefense Science Board (NBSB) has now voted to recommend AVA (Biothrax) anthrax vaccine testing in pediatric population.” 1 This defies many human rights: you cannot under any circumstance experiment on healthy children (like they did with the COVID shots). Needless to say that vax poison completely failed and harmed those children. No retraction from Malone.
By 2014 he was an depopulation fanatic (masons or their mercenaries, are usually depop-nazis), when commenting “The world is becoming more violent. Here are the most and least peaceful countries”, he twitted “yet another predictable consequence of unchecked global population growth.”
There’s no overpopulation, not only because well developed humans contribute more than they use but also because births are shrinking year after year. More problematic of his lack of common sense on that topic, is that he is calling for policies against unchecked population: not a single one of them has been done without violating basic human rights and freedoms… especially informed consent (typical violation by the COVID shots, which by the way were sucessful in Malone’s goal of checking global population growth), yet Malone calls himself a freedom fighter (!) and of course, never retracted.
Worked under Fauci at the National Institute of Allergies and Infectious Diseases (NIAID). He has a long record in the bioweapons complex (10 billion dollars in grants 2012-2017 2):
“I have historically worked with people who have been truly Deep State intelligence community. I have decades of experience in biodefense. I have been deep in the belly of the beast. I have won literally billions of dollars for my clients in grants and contracts. I have managed hundreds of millions of dollars in grants and contracts in the vaccine space.” 3
Dr. Malone “the original inventor of mRNA vaccination as a technology, DNA vaccination, and multiple non-viral DNA and RNA/mRNA platform delivery technologies. He holds numerous fundamental domestic and foreign patents in the fields of gene delivery, delivery formulations, and vaccines, including for fundamental DNA and RNA/mRNA vaccine technologies.” 4
Does Malone receive royalties from Pfizer and Moderna for any of his 57 mRNA patents5, some of which are essential for lipid nanoparticles (there are 1814 patents related to Malone and nanoparticles)? Couldn’t he block them from using his patents in making haccines? US patents expire in 20 years: how many of those are still valid? If he could have blocked vax manufacturers, wouldn’t he be accomplice to genocide? By denying this without giving reasons, he left the accusations open.
Some ask: is it legal and ethical to appropriate patents, when the funding came from the taxpayer and is supposed to benefit the taxpayer, not the researcher who cashed his wage?
It’s like a physicist who worked in the Manhattan Project, the U.S. government research project (1942–45) that produced the first atomic bombs, alleging that he didn’t know his theoretical and practical knowledge would be weaponized, even though he was hired by the military and knew it could be weaponized. Worse if his patents could have stopped the bombing of Nagasaki and Hiroshima. All those lives would be in his conscience.
April 2021. He said he took 2nd Moderna shot: “almost did me in. As in I almost died.” Some say that it is strange that Malone says he got vaccinated after getting COVID: why wouldn’t an expert like him rely on natural immunity and repurposed drugs? Why would he take an EUA experiment, having worked for decades with mRNA for the Department of Defence and CIA, and knowing the failure in cancer patients and the risk of ADE? He said he was expecting the EU to require it but it wasn’t required back then (took without coercion!) and hoped the vax would (magically?) kill his post-COVID cough (!). He almost died, yet he didn’t warn everybody in the interviews to avoid this huge risk until … 13 Jan 2022 ? 6 Not in Puerto Rico 3 Oct 2021 or Hawaii 18 Oct 2021.7
24 Jun 2021 Malone twitted supporting traitor Andrew Hill calling for more evidence on ivermectin (there were thousands of proven cases along a year and there was no harm trying!): “PLEASE pay attention to Dr. Andrew Hill. He is a very solid and mature data scientist. We speak often, and I have complete confidence in him and his team. Evidence-based medicine, not hype.” Malone was replied: “Sorry Dr. Malone, you must have missed Tess Lawrie statement around her private conversation with Dr. Hill where he admitted pressure from sponsors was the cause of his bogus conclusions.“ 12 Malone didn’t answer, maybe he didn’t read it and wasn’t aware of Hill’s 180° change towards the anti-ivermectin genocide. He surely supported ivermectin afterwards.
In early 2022 he was still supporting vaccinating the elderly and high risk, while working for a Bio-defence contract. 13 It seems he never gave a public apology.
He sued freedom fighters like the Breggins, Dr. Peter McCullough (America Out Loud) and Dr. Jane Ruby for 25 million dollars each, instead of leading a class action against the social media that censored him and millions (Twitter, Linkedin, etc.). 14
He attacked Harvey Risch, MD; Judy Mikovits, MD; Paul Alexander, Ph.D.; and The Wellness Company.15
Some argue that this is exactly what a false flag does: block anyone contesting his official narrative. For instance, the Breggins were criticizing Mattias Desmet’s mass formation theory: “The Desmet/Malone Ideology of Mass Psychosis Blames the Citizens and Not the Global Predators“.16 On the contrary, Malone has leaded global congresses in many countries, where he accused global corruption. Still, he refuses to mention “conspiracy”. By suing and not giving explanations, Malone left the accusations open.
If you search for the word “conspiracy” in Malone’s substack, you’ll only find disbelief in such reality. For example, he reposted Desmet, who lays the burden on the people, not the oppressors/predators. Either Malone and Desmet were fooled or they are trying to fool us... into the magical belief that this is a spontaneous yet coordinated process across nations and that there’s nothing else to do except talking us to extermination. Some argue that Malone is the fooled and Desmet is the fooler because he uses half truths to structure a lie. Yet, he might just be a fooled, repeating structured foolishness.
9 Jan 2023. Musk Twitter was still censoring and shadow banning COVID posts and refused to reinstate many accounts from truthers, yet Twitter reinstated Malone’s account (with many others like Kirsch and McCullough). According to Dr. Ruby’s screenshots 17, Twitter blocked her for posting “What is The Malone Doctrine?”: why would Twitter support Malone by banning Dr. Ruby?:
2 Feb 2023. Malone called for a ban on mRNA and DNA COVID injections ... 3 years too late: by Jan 2020, Malone had published a paper showing that, the same as with SARS-Cov-1 and MERS where they caused ADE in animal testing, they were too dangerous for humans, even experimentally: because of the ADE risk, they should thoroughly be tested on animals. 18 He never mentioned this study until accused by the Breggins in Feb 2023.
“He didn't come forward expressing remorse, as lots of great inventors have done before him,19 rueing their sometimes literally earth-shaking inventions, from the atom bomb20 and the Kalishnakov, to the office cubicle and the labradoodle. Notably, as of June 2023, "The History of mRNA Vaccines" still unfolds under a spray of lovely pink blossoms on Malone's website.21” 22
8 Jun 2023. “In some cases I have proceeded to delivering a cease and desist and that was enough. Dr. Richard Fleming was one such case. I sent him a letter, and he stopped… if I win a case, this will become a disincentive for those prone to this sort of behavior in the future, directed towards me or to others… Spreading hate can be quite lucrative in the age of the internet, where attention seeking behavior can be monetized.” 23
Comment: no mention of the scientific dissent causing his lawsuit. Using the “hatred” argument is an ad hominem fallacy proving lack of arguments of the self-victimized.
Will soon publish more in my subs!
In the meantime, read this, it's important:
16 laws we need to exit Prison Planet
Politics got us in, politics is the way out ... after prayers!
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/laws-to-exit-planet-prison
Thanks. Malone is competing with Fauci, Gates. Schwab and company for archvillianhood.
I don’t trust Malone, he’s too polished and made the vaccine technology while making tons of money from it. Perhaps this was his mission all along, to cause more speech restrictions. He also claims he took the vaccine. That sounds pretty moronic knowing what he does about that industry. He knew they only made one mrna come to market by 2020 and it was a million dollars a dose. This is the same with Trump forcing warp speed. He bypassed regulations and now there seems to be no quality control for the countless number of shots they have in the works.
I thought the same thing about crybaby Malone taking the jab - he is either an idiot or a liar, and neither is a good look.
Agreed he even tries to claim he had long covid yet was around doing interviews without any signs of an illness. Victor Davis Hanson had it and he was down for quite some time and just recently recovered after a long battle and many types of intervention
There is no "Long Covid". There is Long Leftism, though, tragicomically.
Sage Hanna and George Webb are on it regarding Malone. Deep diving!
OK, but with all due respect, who are "Sage Hanna" and ""George Webb?
Substackers. Use the search box.
Where is your proof he made tons of money and made the COVID vaxxx technology. He experimented with the idea decades ago and had nothing to do with actual vaxxx rolled-out. The actual developers DENY he had anything to do with the actual vaxxxx!
https://patents.justia.com/inventor/robert-w-malone. There is the list of his patents. Is he being sued for the words out of his own mouth that he owned the patents and sold them? He also says they altered his technology nor does he deny he worked on a team. Patents are held by the pharmaceutical puppets. Edison denied lots of people’s claims they invented the products he sold. He could be an Edison type, but he knows medicine way better then Edison knew electric. I guess knowing when someone is bullshitting or telling the truth is harder for some than others. They have to tell the truth on certain things or you wouldn’t listen at all. He wasn’t wrong about the shots doing harm. Most of his content I don’t question from following these things for many years and hours a day, my job allows me that luxury. I question his motivations
If the techniques he patented were key in the development of the actual vaxxx he should have got paid. That doesn't make him responsible for lack of testing of the actual formulation distributed. I don't get your point.
If someone could have patented the internal combustion engine, that wouldn't make such person responsible for every auto accident due to failed brakes.
The auto industry and the pharmaceutical industry are two different animals. He was paid for his delivery system and handsomely according to him. He also said they altered what was created. I never said I’m blaming him for the vaccine, but Oppenheimer knew he was the dealer of death after what he created. As the creator it’s convenient for him to show up and make claims (tho many true)that are leading to censorship. When actual whistleblowers come out they disappear or have to go to Russia. Cautious skepticism on everything is my point
Oppenheimer was ridiculous. If he hadn't brought the bomb forward someone else would have, perhaps for an even more ruthless power. At least A and H Bombs haven't been used since WWII.
The lipid nanotech he apparently pioneered can carry ANYTHING (also nano) into a cell, good, bad or indifferent. Malone didn't even work on a vaxxx for corona viruses to the best of my knowledge. If someone invents the hand gun for self defense, you can't blame him for stickup men.
I would like to have heard by now some reflections from Dr. Malone concerning his thoughts when he decided to help pioneer the process of genetically modifying people with the object of improving the human genome. What role, if any, did Dr. Malone have in coming up with the phrase "gene therapy," a calculated PR term if ever there was one. What was "therapeutic" about introducing a process of genetic alteration falsely advertised as a remedy for COVID-19? Given his DOD connections and involvements, wouldn't Dr. Malone probably have had from the start some inkling of the lead role of the US military, a role we are learning about from analysis of the Brook Jackson case as put forward by Latypova, Watts and others?
Great points.
No. Your points are without foundation. For instance, some people have genes, allegedly, that make them susceptible to a particular disease or condtion. Altering or eliminating that gene might be beneficial. He had nothing to do with the COVID19 vaxxx AT ALL other than to suggest the technology might be valuable for vaccinations.
Dr. Malone introduced himself by announcing he was one of the inventors of the so-called "gene therapy" that, with the addition of lipid nanoparticles, was deployed to.....???.. not even stop the spread of COVID-19. So then, why was the genetic-alteration procedure deployed? You might be OK Lloyd Miller with GMO seeds and food and now GMO humans. I'm not OK with any of those things. Who can improve on God's design for life? Human life-- all life-- is sacred. Now will we be force-fed to accept mRNA gene manipulations for every disease because the jab was "so effective at stopping COVID-19." We need to speak up loudly against the supposed precedent that no consent is necessary for doing medical experiments, but especially genetic experiments, on human subjects.
The simple question I keep coming back to is: why in hell is Malone suing someone whom pharma-- and the globalists-- would love to smack up a bit??? Hello? It makes zero sense, and no, I do not trust that man.
What we're really up against is a massive censorship/propaganda campaign. This is the true beginning of totalitarianism. Remember that.
The lawsuit = censorship. Censorship is the enemy. Who is Robert Malone, that he's so keen to censor someone exposing the globalist agenda???
Desmet figures in the lawsuit. Desmet talks nonsense.
We need to get clear on this: Desmet is distracting us from the fundamental nature of totalitarianism, which is censorship/propaganda. Malone supports Desmet. Malone wants to censor Breggin who is critical of, and has exposed, Desmet. There are others supporting Desmet, and my conclusion about that is: either they don't understand what he's saying or else they themselves are supporting the narrative that everything is our own fault for our "mechanistic thinking." This narrative is very likely a psychological operation to distract us from the massive censorship/propaganda campaign.
Getting the picture??
Totalitarianism does NOT begin with our "mechanistic thinking." It begins with the state/globalist alliance engaging in massive propaganda and censorship in order to set forward a single narrative that can't be questioned: the exact opposite of freedom of speech and thought.
Desmet’s whole point is the globalists can’t do anything at all without the complicity of the 95%. There have always been and will always be megalomaniacs bent on world domination. It’s up to the people to disavow their power.
The globalists manufacture the complicity: they manufacture the consent. They know how to do this, of course. This is the nature of censorship/propaganda.
In order for people to disavow the power of the globalists the people have to understand what's going on, right? How can they understand if the information they're getting is steering them toward a certain narrative and alternative information is censored? Isn't that what's happening?
The whole Desmet/Malone thing is dangerous and insidious. They want us to blame it on the stupid idiots who can't think for themselves, don't they? They want us to look away from the very source of their power, which is censorship/propaganda. They want to sell us a narrative: they're steering us into accepting the narrative they want us to believe.
Notice what Desmet says about any "steering" (nudging) the globalists are doing. He says it's impersonal in nature and due to our own propensity for mechanistic thinking. No, it's not impersonal at all: it's very deliberate and planned, and I can't help but think that Desmet is very much a part of this steering. Not that he's a bad person, but perhaps he's been compromised or perhaps he really isn't that careful a thinker and was influenced by the wrong people.
Let me be clear: I don't think Malone and Desmet are bad people. But something is seriously wrong here. Good people can make bad decisions. We all make mistakes. For us to refuse to see this, though, is adding fuel to the censorship/propaganda machine. This is what the globalists want: they want their narrative.
Yeah, but Desmet studiously avoids saying there's an internationally coordinated conspiracy. Instead, he weaves a complex tissue of word salad implying this organic miasma of mass formation. When Malone first bruited it about, I detected that its function is to deflect FROM conspiracy by supplying an alternative explanation for the mass of phenomena that otherwise reasonable people would infer reflects a conspiracy.
Conspiracies, like megalomaniacs bent on world domination, abound. According to Desmet, 30% of the population are susceptible to the lies, while 65% are too chickenshit to contest them. It is up to the remaining 5% to speak up.
Noting the abundance of conspiracies isn't a refutation of any specific conspiracy.
"So what?" indeed.
Now that's the spirit!
Aw Celia, I get it! I’m conflict-averse too and recently waking up to the effects of my childhood trauma on my adult brain and responses to people. Thoroughly enjoy your posts here. Thank you!
An old man once told me, "What other people think of you is none of your business."
That’s a good one!
Amen to "So what?"
Also useful to dismiss those who are eager to mess with you and waste your time with their own nonsense: "Knock yourself out."
Great write-up of the situation by West. The guy seems to have flipped his lid; either that or he's a gaslighting narcissist. I think the latter fits best.
Malone has quite an interesting history. A very smart person once said, “Be wary of someone whom you’ve never seen nor heard of, is then all of a sudden.... everywhere!” That’s Robert Malone. Pretending to be a hero now when he had much to do with suppressing Alternative C treatments and pushed Remdesivir along the way.
On the contrary, Malone was pushing "re-purposed" drugs to fight the alleged COVID19 and was very critical of Fauci approach. I never heard of him push Remdesivir. Source?
Some people -- even some otherwise intelligent people -- think that controlled opposition must come in vivid purple jumpsuits and neon lights flashing "Look at me! I'm controlled opposition!" Apparently, they've never thought that if there is a conspiracy, the conspirators would use their wealth and power to infiltrate any nascent counter-movement that might arise in society -- like, say, an anti-vaxx movement; and that this infiltration would use people who seem to be on our side. DUH.
Ha…risk averse…you took on the entire establishment, when few understood or cared because it didn’t affect their lives. Today there is so much dis/mis information being flung around on all sides, it is hard to keep up with one’s own thoughts. Malone left me uncomfortable after listening to his chat with teenagers in Hawaii about vaccines. Something was decidedly off. The Breggins have been thoughtful, knowledgeable and sincere, I have been following Peter Breggin since the early 80’s and the message has always been a consistent one. This lawsuit makes no sense, since March of 2020 I keep looking for the rational, does it even exist?
You bring up something Malone said to some children in Hawaii about their getting the injection. He himself talked about it. I don't want to misquote, but when I read his dialog to those children it sent serious chills up my spine. I do not trust him.
Yes! That interview got under my skin...I had decided to watch it to be bolstered by a clear warning to the kids, but instead it was somehow eerily a plug for the shot givers. Can't remember the details, but remember I stopped watching because I found it so disturbing.
Mostly, I feel, when reading your work, what a pleasure it would be to meet you and just chat.
I am about to start organizing meetups/book readings, just need to find time, but very soon, small scale. I will ask soon where everybody lives and pick a spot most people can come to...
cool!
I had a different two words in mind. :-)
Hee! Hee! Can we hear a Big FU! 😉
No one with a good heart likes conflict. Keep going. The world needs you. ♥