I want to clarify my position, having just removed text from a previous post that was not clear enough so I am doing a re-take. I oppose the “it’s all the Jews” talk. More and more common lately. So I contrasted with: When I look at global leaders, WEFers, architects of present day death and tyranny, I see only one common trait and that is not Jewishness but rather atheism, and/or maybe some form of occultism, who knows. But no Judeo/Christian ethics, anywhere in sight, with the WEF/Davos crowd, is my point. Look at the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation home page and you will see how he throws his money around and spells out who he will NOT fund. Can you guess? Any organization with any religious beliefs or affiliations. That’s a tell. Also, he’s not Jewish. Nor is Fauci. Nor is Gallo. Nor is Biden. Obama. Trudeau. Schwab. And so forth.
In James Corbett’s stunning and typically well researched 3 part series “How BlackRock Conquered the World,” he basically concludes that beyond Gates, beyond Rockefellers, beyond banksters, beyond WEF, as the largest asset manager in the world handling trillions of dollars, BlackRock essentially controls the global economy which in turn controls most all aspects of a society.
Corbett explains that interlocking connections with Vanguard and State Street (next largest asset managers in the world) enables BlackRock to have strategic controlling interests in just about every corporation in the world and in just about every government in the world.
Economist Ellen Brown stated that there was only one entity that could force the world to lock down instantly and simultaneously in 2020 and that was BlackRock.
Real people make up Blackrock's Board of Directors. Realizing they had to walk their talk, today's Board is woke-diversified. But below was the 2020 BlackRock Board. The composition exemplifies the "fearsome vultures" (Elizabeth Nickson’s words) BlackRock's Board had always been since its founding.
Larry Fink
Robert Kapito
Robert Goldstein
Ben Golub
Gary Shedlin
Derek Stein
Mark Weidman
Mark Wiseman
Say their names. Make your own conclusions about BlackRock. Read James Corbett's report.
Gosh you do enter delicate territory! I respect that; And your authentic, inquiring content.
It's a shame atheism and socialism have come to be lumped in the same category. As a lifelong student of early Buddhism, that is, the Tripitaka, the earliest canonical works of the historical Buddha, this contemporary conversation can be seen through an entirely different lens. Was the buddha an atheist, a non theist? The short and simple answer is, yes. His teachings on cultivating awareness (sati), equanimity (upekhha) and compassion (karuna) are in no way connected to or contingent upon any belief in any deity. Does that qualify then as atheistic? Probably. But that's missing the point. It's just that in regards to developing these universal human qualities, from
the Buddhist perspective, theism is not required. The Buddha's teachings are not explicitly atheistic; theism is neither a requirement for or disqualification from practicing the dharma. Indeed today, people from many different religious backgrounds, believing in their different version of theism, also simultaneously practice the dharma, the Buddha's universal, non-theistic teachings. It is true that the Buddha was often critical of the theists of his time, but that was not in advocacy of atheism. I could go on, but my pasta is on the stove! Suffice to say, I know many many wonderful non theists who are deeply connected to the soul of the universe and are in no way advocates of the emptiness of the corrupted Davos Man we see painfully manifest today.
Atheists make good "useful idiots" and are to be pitied and prayed for, but committed socialists/communists deserve our contempt. I read Marx, Lenin, Stalin, Bukovsky and all of Diana West's works years ago but only added The Devil's Chessboard last month and am currently (finally) reading Creature from Jekyll Island. I never imagined the size of that red pill and find myself gagging on every nauseating mouthful.
On the bright side, God has already won this war.
“The fear of the Lord is the beginning of knowledge, but fools despise wisdom and instruction.” Proverbs 1:7
It is appealing to want to ban the ‘hate mongers’ or ‘lunatics’ but….
As Evelyn Beatrice Hall, paraphrasing Voltaire, said: “I disagree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it”. If we are against the censorship that is applied by the MSM, we should not condone it anywhere! Also not in a blog. Matters of dissent can only be discussed when out in the open and not banned.
Interesting that it is the most secular Jews who beat the drums most loudly about anti-Semitism. Observant Jews - Zev Zelenko comes to mind - have no problems and throw no accusations.
I recently posted about the strident crusades against anti-Semitism in a magazine edited by a former acquaintance - who was living comfortably with a goy when I knew her. Go figure.
Let me begin by labelling myself a Marxist Libertarian. I don't normally label myself but in order to understand what I'm about to say, a label is required to comprehend the backstory.
The vast majority of the populace neither comprehends what a Marxist is, let alone a Marxist Libertarian. Furthermore, the vast majority of people comprehend neither socialism nor communism. The vast majority of people can't even eloquently describe what a woman is (Matt Walsh's documentary). I just said that to underscore how deeply ignorant most people are with regard to even simple concepts.
Academic Marxists have terms like "actually existing communism" and "actually existing socialism" to differentiate between what we've experienced in the past/present as opposed to what those economic systems/ideologies would become in the future, through evolution of the concept.
For example, my parents escaped Hungary in 1956 during a revolution against the Soviet power structure that dominated their lives and prevented them from engaging in democratic outcomes. Contrast that experience with that of my husband who grew up in Hungary post-revolution during what was called "Goulash Communism", a period where everyone had a free home, a job, a summer home, vacations, free public transit, free post secondary schooling and free healthcare. The basics were covered and the vast majority of the populace were equal (with the exception of the corrupt politicians, of course, but they were a minority!) Funny, right? My parents leave their homeland due to authoritarian struggle in 1956, and my husband grows up afterwards in a system where everyone is pretty much equal and gets all their basic needs met. What a paradox!!!
Now to the question of what is a Marxist Libertarian? We are people who believe that Democracy in the workplace (as well as in private space) is the best way to represent the electorate, and that capital accumulation is unnecessary if everyone has their basic needs met. For example, social housing in Vienna is a great example of how the state can subsidize (or not) the living spaces for middle to lower income earners who need to rent. We don't ban private homes or private capital accumulation for those that are wealthy. We just say to those that are privately wealthy, go ahead do your thing! It doesn't affect us because we have jobs, homes, education, healthcare and social structures. We're good! (Please google social housing in Vienna. It's quite remarkable.)
There are a myriad of academics and scientists who've studied capitalism in order to understand marxism. I'm one of them. Communism was the end-goal. It never happened anywhere. Yes, the various political parties called themselves Communists but they never achieved the end-goal of Communism. Communism is the most democratic economic and social system. However, it was never allowed to blossom into full-fledged Communism because too many sharks in the sea devoured its very foundational goals. (Namely the US.)
Stalin was a mass murderer. Hitler was a mass murderer. Mao was a mass murderer. Let's not conflate these three (plus more!) mass murderers and suggest that the economic/social paradigm of "Communism" was a bad idea. If you've studied it as long as I have, and your family lived under it, one would hope that you understand the nuances, the historical differences, the propaganda, and the fact that we've *never* had a proper Communist country on this earth as we believe to know it. Never happened. It was a complete fabrication of the term "Communist". The Democrats call themselves "Liberal" (actually, they're Neo-liberal, anything but liberal). The Republicans call themselves "Conservative" (actually, they spend as much public money on non-essential things like war as the Democrats do -- hardly "conservative"). "Communist" was just a label, that never evolved into the egalitarian society that its founders envisioned.
I hope we can continue this discussion forward. I can't wait to get your book that I ordered. Should be out shortly! Cheers, Celia, and thanks for listening (if you read this).
FOUND THIS at the 21 minute mark on the jewish part of operation paperclip https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rkvM_1_fDuE Prof Hamamoto.... and of course Ford wrote his researched books and coined the term 'International Jew' so he refers to just a sliver not a blanket accusation
I’m against censorship. I am often confounded by the whole Jewish thing. They have a huge advantage in society because of their discipline and cultural preference for education and rigorous debate. Their tribalism makes them stronger than the rest of us. They are highly literate and talented. So of course they dominate many fields. It works against them when they persecute and smear anyone who calls attention to their power and influence. That’s a confounding paradox that makes it easy to believe in conspiracy. The holocaust narrative is extremely touchy. See Norman Finkelstein’s book “Holocaust Industry” for a brave analysis. The word holocaust was not used in broad strokes until the 1970s. Then the deluge of literature and movies started pouring out. There are many inconsistencies in the history we were taught (if taught at all). So revision is necessary, and constantly so. As science needs debate and repeatable results by experiment, because most scientific interpretations are hypotheses, so does history need to be constantly rewritten, as new documents come to light, and as INTERESTED PARTIES DIE OFF. Powerful people and institutions always try to protect the narrative that suits their interests. Churchill produced volumes of beautiful words, but no one can say that his works are objective and free of bias. This is what’s meant by the “pick locks of biographers,” the truth has to be slowly assembled over time.
Celia, thank you for raising these very important and provocative discussion topics. I value your sharing your thoughts, feelings and observations!! I think you might appreciate the beautifully formulated request for a religious exemption from the covid shot requirement that a vastly spiritual, principled, courageous and loving friend of mine submitted to the community college where she teaches. Since she doesn't refer to God or any organized religion, they denied it right off the bat, but she persisted and eventually got it. Her students love her classes. https://babsislivingsystemsexplorations.substack.com/p/invitation-to-an-accomodation-for
I have to give vent to my vexation at your comments on atheism, socialism and Judaeo-Christian values.
Where I am coming from: At seventy I have spent all my life considering these issues and I have a right to voice my verdict. Christianity is the worst thing which has happened to me. For others it will be communism, and for others having been tricked by transhumanists or Satanists into taking poison. Some have found their salvation in belief much as some swear by the benefits of a particular diet. I have banished the word God from my vocabulary, but you are free to have one divinity, or three for that matter, just understand that imposing this talk on me is a provocation. I imagine I speak for many others here, especially in secular Europe, where I am at home. Belief in God without prayer, worship and much else is empty rhetoric, falsehood avoided by atheists (who may be devoted to Truth and Freedom).
Because someone is averse to Christianity does not imply even remotely that they endorse anything from the vilains you mention. On the contrary, most Christians seem to have sided with the “measures,” and many enthusiastically so. Why you should wish to associate yourself with Christian rather than Enlightenment values is a mystery. Christianity is a damaged brand.
I thought you were crystal clear in your first post but thank you for caring so much about everybody that you took the time to rewrite it! There is so much opposition to goodness in the world. I do believe we have to not only uphold it but protect it. Thank you.
In James Corbett’s stunning and typically well researched 3 part series “How BlackRock Conquered the World,” he basically concludes that beyond Gates, beyond Rockefellers, beyond banksters, beyond WEF, as the largest asset manager in the world handling trillions of dollars, BlackRock essentially controls the global economy which in turn controls most all aspects of a society.
Corbett explains that interlocking connections with Vanguard and State Street (next largest asset managers in the world) enables BlackRock to have strategic controlling interests in just about every corporation in the world and in just about every government in the world.
Economist Ellen Brown stated that there was only one entity that could force the world to lock down instantly and simultaneously in 2020 and that was BlackRock.
In 2020, in a no-bid contract (!) BlackRock was given charge of the U.S. Treasury and Federal Reserve. https://cosmoschronicle.com/blackrock-has-taken-over-the-us-treasury-and-federal-reserve-bank/
Real people make up Blackrock's Board of Directors. Realizing they had to walk their talk, today's Board is woke-diversified. But below was the 2020 BlackRock Board. The composition exemplifies the "fearsome vultures" (Elizabeth Nickson’s words) BlackRock's Board had always been since its founding.
Larry Fink
Robert Kapito
Robert Goldstein
Ben Golub
Gary Shedlin
Derek Stein
Mark Weidman
Mark Wiseman
Say their names. Make your own conclusions about BlackRock. Read James Corbett's report.
https://www.corbettreport.com/how-blackrock-conquered-the-world-part-1/
Gosh you do enter delicate territory! I respect that; And your authentic, inquiring content.
It's a shame atheism and socialism have come to be lumped in the same category. As a lifelong student of early Buddhism, that is, the Tripitaka, the earliest canonical works of the historical Buddha, this contemporary conversation can be seen through an entirely different lens. Was the buddha an atheist, a non theist? The short and simple answer is, yes. His teachings on cultivating awareness (sati), equanimity (upekhha) and compassion (karuna) are in no way connected to or contingent upon any belief in any deity. Does that qualify then as atheistic? Probably. But that's missing the point. It's just that in regards to developing these universal human qualities, from
the Buddhist perspective, theism is not required. The Buddha's teachings are not explicitly atheistic; theism is neither a requirement for or disqualification from practicing the dharma. Indeed today, people from many different religious backgrounds, believing in their different version of theism, also simultaneously practice the dharma, the Buddha's universal, non-theistic teachings. It is true that the Buddha was often critical of the theists of his time, but that was not in advocacy of atheism. I could go on, but my pasta is on the stove! Suffice to say, I know many many wonderful non theists who are deeply connected to the soul of the universe and are in no way advocates of the emptiness of the corrupted Davos Man we see painfully manifest today.
Atheists make good "useful idiots" and are to be pitied and prayed for, but committed socialists/communists deserve our contempt. I read Marx, Lenin, Stalin, Bukovsky and all of Diana West's works years ago but only added The Devil's Chessboard last month and am currently (finally) reading Creature from Jekyll Island. I never imagined the size of that red pill and find myself gagging on every nauseating mouthful.
On the bright side, God has already won this war.
“The fear of the Lord is the beginning of knowledge, but fools despise wisdom and instruction.” Proverbs 1:7
"Those who love God HATE evil." Psalm 97:10
In communication there is always partial misunderstanding. That is what my college speech professor said. I believed him.
You're completely right.
The atheists and socialists want to build heaven here on earth. At least this is what they tell themselves.
Religious people know that us humans are not up to that, that it will end in disaster every time, and that the only heaven to be found is after death.
It is appealing to want to ban the ‘hate mongers’ or ‘lunatics’ but….
As Evelyn Beatrice Hall, paraphrasing Voltaire, said: “I disagree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it”. If we are against the censorship that is applied by the MSM, we should not condone it anywhere! Also not in a blog. Matters of dissent can only be discussed when out in the open and not banned.
Interesting that it is the most secular Jews who beat the drums most loudly about anti-Semitism. Observant Jews - Zev Zelenko comes to mind - have no problems and throw no accusations.
I recently posted about the strident crusades against anti-Semitism in a magazine edited by a former acquaintance - who was living comfortably with a goy when I knew her. Go figure.
https://grahamseibert.substack.com/p/back-to-a-touchy-subject-back-on
Let me begin by labelling myself a Marxist Libertarian. I don't normally label myself but in order to understand what I'm about to say, a label is required to comprehend the backstory.
The vast majority of the populace neither comprehends what a Marxist is, let alone a Marxist Libertarian. Furthermore, the vast majority of people comprehend neither socialism nor communism. The vast majority of people can't even eloquently describe what a woman is (Matt Walsh's documentary). I just said that to underscore how deeply ignorant most people are with regard to even simple concepts.
Academic Marxists have terms like "actually existing communism" and "actually existing socialism" to differentiate between what we've experienced in the past/present as opposed to what those economic systems/ideologies would become in the future, through evolution of the concept.
For example, my parents escaped Hungary in 1956 during a revolution against the Soviet power structure that dominated their lives and prevented them from engaging in democratic outcomes. Contrast that experience with that of my husband who grew up in Hungary post-revolution during what was called "Goulash Communism", a period where everyone had a free home, a job, a summer home, vacations, free public transit, free post secondary schooling and free healthcare. The basics were covered and the vast majority of the populace were equal (with the exception of the corrupt politicians, of course, but they were a minority!) Funny, right? My parents leave their homeland due to authoritarian struggle in 1956, and my husband grows up afterwards in a system where everyone is pretty much equal and gets all their basic needs met. What a paradox!!!
Now to the question of what is a Marxist Libertarian? We are people who believe that Democracy in the workplace (as well as in private space) is the best way to represent the electorate, and that capital accumulation is unnecessary if everyone has their basic needs met. For example, social housing in Vienna is a great example of how the state can subsidize (or not) the living spaces for middle to lower income earners who need to rent. We don't ban private homes or private capital accumulation for those that are wealthy. We just say to those that are privately wealthy, go ahead do your thing! It doesn't affect us because we have jobs, homes, education, healthcare and social structures. We're good! (Please google social housing in Vienna. It's quite remarkable.)
There are a myriad of academics and scientists who've studied capitalism in order to understand marxism. I'm one of them. Communism was the end-goal. It never happened anywhere. Yes, the various political parties called themselves Communists but they never achieved the end-goal of Communism. Communism is the most democratic economic and social system. However, it was never allowed to blossom into full-fledged Communism because too many sharks in the sea devoured its very foundational goals. (Namely the US.)
Stalin was a mass murderer. Hitler was a mass murderer. Mao was a mass murderer. Let's not conflate these three (plus more!) mass murderers and suggest that the economic/social paradigm of "Communism" was a bad idea. If you've studied it as long as I have, and your family lived under it, one would hope that you understand the nuances, the historical differences, the propaganda, and the fact that we've *never* had a proper Communist country on this earth as we believe to know it. Never happened. It was a complete fabrication of the term "Communist". The Democrats call themselves "Liberal" (actually, they're Neo-liberal, anything but liberal). The Republicans call themselves "Conservative" (actually, they spend as much public money on non-essential things like war as the Democrats do -- hardly "conservative"). "Communist" was just a label, that never evolved into the egalitarian society that its founders envisioned.
I hope we can continue this discussion forward. I can't wait to get your book that I ordered. Should be out shortly! Cheers, Celia, and thanks for listening (if you read this).
FOUND THIS at the 21 minute mark on the jewish part of operation paperclip https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rkvM_1_fDuE Prof Hamamoto.... and of course Ford wrote his researched books and coined the term 'International Jew' so he refers to just a sliver not a blanket accusation
I’m against censorship. I am often confounded by the whole Jewish thing. They have a huge advantage in society because of their discipline and cultural preference for education and rigorous debate. Their tribalism makes them stronger than the rest of us. They are highly literate and talented. So of course they dominate many fields. It works against them when they persecute and smear anyone who calls attention to their power and influence. That’s a confounding paradox that makes it easy to believe in conspiracy. The holocaust narrative is extremely touchy. See Norman Finkelstein’s book “Holocaust Industry” for a brave analysis. The word holocaust was not used in broad strokes until the 1970s. Then the deluge of literature and movies started pouring out. There are many inconsistencies in the history we were taught (if taught at all). So revision is necessary, and constantly so. As science needs debate and repeatable results by experiment, because most scientific interpretations are hypotheses, so does history need to be constantly rewritten, as new documents come to light, and as INTERESTED PARTIES DIE OFF. Powerful people and institutions always try to protect the narrative that suits their interests. Churchill produced volumes of beautiful words, but no one can say that his works are objective and free of bias. This is what’s meant by the “pick locks of biographers,” the truth has to be slowly assembled over time.
The only problem I found in that post was the use of "atheist" when it should be Luciferian.
It really is a death cult we face, atheism is part of their cover.
Celia, thank you for raising these very important and provocative discussion topics. I value your sharing your thoughts, feelings and observations!! I think you might appreciate the beautifully formulated request for a religious exemption from the covid shot requirement that a vastly spiritual, principled, courageous and loving friend of mine submitted to the community college where she teaches. Since she doesn't refer to God or any organized religion, they denied it right off the bat, but she persisted and eventually got it. Her students love her classes. https://babsislivingsystemsexplorations.substack.com/p/invitation-to-an-accomodation-for
Dear Celia,
I have to give vent to my vexation at your comments on atheism, socialism and Judaeo-Christian values.
Where I am coming from: At seventy I have spent all my life considering these issues and I have a right to voice my verdict. Christianity is the worst thing which has happened to me. For others it will be communism, and for others having been tricked by transhumanists or Satanists into taking poison. Some have found their salvation in belief much as some swear by the benefits of a particular diet. I have banished the word God from my vocabulary, but you are free to have one divinity, or three for that matter, just understand that imposing this talk on me is a provocation. I imagine I speak for many others here, especially in secular Europe, where I am at home. Belief in God without prayer, worship and much else is empty rhetoric, falsehood avoided by atheists (who may be devoted to Truth and Freedom).
Because someone is averse to Christianity does not imply even remotely that they endorse anything from the vilains you mention. On the contrary, most Christians seem to have sided with the “measures,” and many enthusiastically so. Why you should wish to associate yourself with Christian rather than Enlightenment values is a mystery. Christianity is a damaged brand.
I thought you were crystal clear in your first post but thank you for caring so much about everybody that you took the time to rewrite it! There is so much opposition to goodness in the world. I do believe we have to not only uphold it but protect it. Thank you.
Certainly, a desire to subjugate humanity requires a rejection of the authority of any divinity.
I agree, to simply blame "the Jews" is a gross overgeneralization. Many of the criminals running the show are Jewish, but even more of them are not.
What they all have in common is a sociopathic contempt for "the little people".