54 Comments

Actually it was Becerra that extended the PREP Act. He said “COVID-19 continues to present a credible risk of a future public health emergency." Well, I believe it is the HHS, headed by Becerra, that presents the greatest risk as they oversee the CDC, FDA, and NIH.

Expand full comment

Hopefully RFKJR is confirmed to lead HHS.

Expand full comment

What we need is to repeal the PREP Act - Restore liability. I agree with you about Kennedy.

Expand full comment

There’s absolutely no “political will” to repeal the PREP Act! All of Congress is equally complicit. The hearings that Senator Ron Johnson held over the past two years, went nowhere. Nothing has been done to reign in Big Pharma and Big Medicine, (and ALL the Bad Actors at the three letter ‘health agencies’), except them being given free pass after free pass. And I don’t see how Trump or RFK Jr is going to change that. Sorry to be such a ‘Debbie Downer” here, and not on the “Trump Train of Change”, but that’s how I see it.

Expand full comment

The reality of things, not you is the Downer. The fix is more elaborate, more diabolically clever than IMO all but a small minority realize. https://www.brighteon.com/c162a1a6-6f7f-4c4d-97a8-0986410ca083

Expand full comment

I had no idea the law has so many supporters. Is this a benefit of the willingness of pharma to pay-to-play? I am trying to think of how this might have affected the Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic's distance from certain subjects.

Thank you for your feedback - I find it very helpful.

Expand full comment

The Select SubCommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic ‘hearings’ were all for show. And even though you had the usual ‘medical freedom suspects’, like Del Bigtree, Dr. Bob Malone, Dr. McCullough and others as well, ‘testifying’ it was a sham! What has happened (like serious investigations, and or bringing charges against people who perpetuated the Scamdemic, ie; all the 3 letter health agencies) as a result of it? As we say where I come from…NADA!

Expand full comment

The PREP Act is illegal - and therefore void.

-

S.C.U.S. - Marbury vs. Madison

"...a law repugnant to the Constitution is VOID, and the courts, as well as other departments are BOUND thereby."

The PREP Act purports to remove deny we the people of our right "...when the value in controversy exceeds $20. the right to a trial by jury shall be preserved..."

The PREP Act takes this authority from the Judicial Branch and gives it to the Executive Branch, under a "compensation program" which it has the (illegitimate) 'authority' to decide who among the injured gets compensation & how much - with no hearing, no assistance of a lawyer, and no way to appeal. This also violates the 'separation of powers between the branches of the federal government.

Congress does not & never had the power to deny We the People our Rights, nor violate the functions of each Branch of the federation government.

U.S. Constitution Article VI

"This Constitution, and the laws of the United States which shall be made IN PURSUANCE thereof; and Treaties made or which shall be made under (not above nor beyond) the Authority of the United States; shall be the supreme Law of the Land..."

"The Senators & Representatives before mentioned, and the members of the several State legislatures, and all executive & judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be BOUND by Oat or Affirmation to support this Constitution..."

U.S. Const. Amend. X

"The powers not delegate to the United States by (We the People through) the Constitution, nor prohibited b it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or TO THE PEOPLE."

Also, through the Office of Budget & Management, the president could cut off funding to the Dept. of HHS, or any division thereof- the CDC, the NIH, to help insure their conformity to the Constitution.

Expand full comment

and Bayh-Dole and 1986 Childhood Vaccine Injury Act

Expand full comment

Yea well look how long that’s been in place…the Childhood Vaccine Injury Act…say 38 years or so. And have there been less childhood vaxx injuries, since it’s passing? NO! It only further shielded & protected Big Pharma from being liable for their products!

And the children that were injured, have those families received much compensation? That would be another hard NO!

Expand full comment

So, if Congress will not restore liabiliy to pharma, perhaps closing the CDC and FDA is the best approach. Surely Kennedy must know Congress will not restore liability. And we cannot rely on voting in a different Congress.

Expand full comment

Restoring Pharma’s liability? That will be a cold day in hell, as they say. There will be deals made…and in order to ‘confirm’ RFK Jr to HHS, Big Pharma will ‘stand down’ and not oppose it, and then be left alone (without any prosecutions or legal action) taken by Trump & Co!

Expand full comment

Yup!

Expand full comment

We'll add Bacerra to the list of murderers who need dealing with when they are tried for PREMEDITATED MASS-MURDER! UNJABBED Mick (UK).

Expand full comment

Does fraud waive immunity

Expand full comment

Consider also the potential of civil suits and state-level criminal prosecutions.

Pfauci, Hotez, Collins, Bourla, Bancel, Birx, Walensky, etc etc must all be tried and hanged for the worst crimes against humanity ever, or else no one is safe from mass murder by government mandated mRNA.

Expand full comment

Mandated mRNA (jabs?) will become moot. I'm guessing that instead aviation delivery systems with a new generation of aerosols will be the next means by which to poison the public.

Expand full comment

Blows my mind that hardly anybody seems to care about the chemtrails being laid down in our skies day after day after day. We are so effin stupid and depraved that they can literally spray us like bugs and we’ll insist it’s not happening for our own psychological comfort, and we are so depraved that we’ll do to it each other for a couple bucks per gallon of poison sprayed. If they win, isn’t it ultimately a resounding judgment upon us all?

Expand full comment

I'm right there with ya, bud. It's boiling frog meets slow motion trainwreck.

Expand full comment

This is why it is so important to try and hang Pfauci for his crimes ASAP.

Expand full comment

One nice thing about American jurisprudence in 2024 is that it could be done either after or before the trial :- )

Expand full comment

I see millions of victims of fraud and murder defend the perpetrators of fraud and murder.

With Pride.

The people on the left and the people on the right support the same things. They are not divided, there is only an appearance of division.

To support Netanyahu's genocide is the same as accepting masking and mandatory medical pretreatments for predisease to keep your inalienable rights active.

And to support medical tyranny is the same as supporting Netanyahu's genocide.

Expand full comment

That’s how I see it as well. I was almost a total MAGA and Bobby adherent before I watched them condone one of the biggest crimes I’ve ever seen. I cry a lot these days. Who here cares? Have we no heart? What in the absolute hell? And sometimes I transition from sadness to anger and judgment. If that’s how you are, then be ye gone. We all die. Just ask a Palestinian or a parent of a SIDS victim or an mRNA recipient. I’m so tired of it. So tired. How does it get better without a cleansing?

Expand full comment

So, you are traumatized, huh?

Politics is no solution. At best is a displacement of problems toward other people, in the future or in the past.

The nature of politics is to bind people in despair.

Try anti-politics.

Anti-politics is better.

Anti-politics is anything that is not politics.

You have in your power to have compassion for yourself. Avoiding politics counts as an example of compassion, I think.

Expand full comment

So much for a smooth transition

Expand full comment

When the out-going regime does everything in it's power to disrupt and destroy the transition and disrupt and destroy the nation on the way out it is perfectly clear that we were perfectly correct that the objective has always been

DESTROY THE NATION!

By any means necessary of course

Got to say, the destroying and fire sale of the border fence on the way out is a pretty reprehensible touch. Not different at all than when the "losing" side destroys all munitions, sinks the carriers and destroys bridges, buildings and roads while making a strategic retreat in a long term war

Because WE ARE IN A WAR and as the eternal enemy head fakes and makes a short term strategic retreat they destroy all assets that may be beneficial to the enemy. THAT'S why they're trying to destroy the fence and make it hard to replace. Maybe they can even set us up for complete financial collapse. As they always say, BY ANY MEANS NECESSARY.

Make no mistake. They have not conceded one millimeter because elections and will of the people are of no consequence in the minds of the any means necessary folks

In the past they would starve you to death or work you to death in a Gulag if you did not see it their way. In the age of military grade psyop optics they'll slow kill you with bio weapons while simultaneously driving you to despair and driving you crazy.

It is a multi-prong attack just like a conventional war. The means may vary but VICTORY is always the goal

And what is victory? Well hell, good question. Even the adversary does not know. If you really press them they may come up with an honest answer. "They win you lose"

Other than that don't press them for the details of "what does victory mean for you guys?" because other than "we win you don't they really do not know". No amount of consequent suffering discounts their lust to win.

One thing is certain. If there is a retreat, it is only a strategic retreat. The Indemnity till 2029 is because they 100% intend to be back in the saddle by 2030..

Expand full comment

Good rant Ray with good summation.

Of course a conspiracy theorist might say that Trump wants them to do this as part of the uni party general destruction plan.

Expand full comment

Rants being what they are, rants:) I sometimes forget to add the summary rant. There rant body is therapeutic. The summary is informational:)

Expand full comment

What if there is enough evidence for 2020 election fraud like the 2000 Mules documentary, the Patrick Byrne info about the 13 million fake votes delivered by the USPS- hired by unidentified contract, the Dominion hacking evidence in Colorado n Arizona, Tina Peters, the provable fraud involving sponsors of "migrants" Pharma corruption, Ukraine money laundering on both sides of congress? Are all of the actions of an illegitimate administration and corrupt legislature suddenly null and void? Does the public get a refund and apology only for the next lot to do it again?

Expand full comment

IMO there is almost zero chance of retroactive justice based on proof of corruption and fraud. For starters it depends on a well functioning justice system and the dysfunction of the justice system is often a huge critical and necessary criteria for the fraud to occur in the first place. The border and voter fraud are easy contemporary examples. We do not need "comprehensive border and immigration reform" as they've been gaslighting us about for over 4 decades. All we need is to enforce the laws on the books and the situation would not be the situation it is. Nor would there be so much voter fraud if laws were enforced and if the fraud were not built in BY DESIGN. Mail in votes, early/late votes, absentee votes, ALL are intuitively and expert acknowledged to be vectors of corruption. So why do they continually expand those options?

BECAUSE THEY WANT THE CORRUPTION

When they say "golly we're so upset about the voter corruption" we must call BS because if anyone were REALLY upset they would not permit those things THEY KNOW maximize corruption. You tend to get what you want if it is cooked in to the system.

Suspect everyone has heard the saying, "better to act now and beg for forgiveness later". It's because "just do it" works in lax environments and the most lax environment is the lack of rule of laws, particularly election laws where bust our cheating is rarely if ever SUBSTANTIVELY punished or reversed. No one has ever seen and doubt any one will EVER see a POTUS or elected official deposed because it was proven beyond any shadow of doubt that they were robbed. Everyone's hero JFK for example was elected because he selected LBJ EXPRESSLY to expedite voter corruption. No one ever seems to have a problem with the fact that other than his corruption potential and the necessity of it THE KENNEDY'S LOATHED LBJ. Had there been an election reversal based on probable provable corruption JFK may never have been assassinator because he would not have won. And ironic example because it highlights that corruption will probably stand even if it costs you your life.

Not holding my breath for example for Carey Lake of Arizona to ever be awarded even one of the elections stolen from her.

There is also the tactic of "change the facts on the ground" which is the tactic of invader tyrant dirt bags everywhere. No matter how unjust and unpopular the tyrants will always seek to change the facts on the ground to make the unpopular irreversible. First order of business of every tyrant is to colonize the invaded to cement irreversibility. Still working well in the Russian part of Ukraine as just one contemporary example. That is why the borders are flooded against the will of the citizens and it explains a lot of middle east history. The soon occupied nation can bitch all they want but if the occupation and changing the facts on the ground are allowed to go on without impedance no amount of political maneuvering or "rule of law and justice" is going to reverse it. Biden let untold millions in during his weekend at Bernie's stint and on the way out he is opening the flood gates wider. Changing the facts on the ground in difficult almost irreversible ways. That's how occupier invader traitor leaders roll.

Just "act now" worry about consequences later (because almost certain there won't be any) and "change the facts on the ground" by invading the land or the minds of the population targeted for occupation so no matter how they feel about it and no matter the justice or lack of justice of it the facts on the ground will dictate it is never going to change

That is why some lines in the sand about what people will tolerate are so existential because once installed it is rare indeed that there will ever be a reversal to fix an injustice. When Trump was vanquished it was assumed he was gone forever because a reprise only happened once in history. The fact there is even a chance at a do over is a miracle. But in the end who knows what will happen?

Expand full comment

Great reply. "By Design..." I think a majority of Americans are still floored by how surreal the multiple fronts of destruction taking place seem to be. The gaslighting may be backfiring slightly against the levels of trust previously enjoyed by the ruling forces, but there seems to be an agenda that likely involves AI, a surveillance state, digital ID, currency, and prison. Dissenters will be locked out of the system as some already or still are...

Expand full comment

Great point! If the products currently under EUAs - with liability protection under the PREP Act, are safe, there is no need for 'legal immunity'.

This alleged legal immunity under the PREP Act is unconstitutional, and therefore void.

The Constitution protects our right to a jury trial "where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars'" . Amendment VII

The PREP Act instead has a "compensation program" that -has no hearing, -does not allow the opportunity for assistance of an attorney, -has no appeal process. This CICP program adjudicates whether or not someone is eligible for compensation in a completely non-transparent process. It is an Executive Branch body hijacking a Judicial Branch function.

Congress does not have the authority to pass laws that violate the Constitution.

In the foundational case of the Supreme Court of the U.S., the justices said:

“If he (the citizen) has a right, and that right has been violated, do the laws of his country afford him a remedy? The very essence of civil liberty certainly consists in the right of every individual to claim the protection of the laws, whenever he receives an injury. One of the first duties of government is to afford that protection."

"...it is a general and indisputable rule, that where there is a legal right, there is also a legal remedy by suit or action at law whenever that right is invaded.'

"The government of the United States has been emphatically termed a government of laws, and not of men. It will certainly cease to deserve this high appellation, if the laws furnish no remedy for the violation of a vested legal right.”

"...in declaring what shall be the supreme Law of the Land, the Constitution itself is first mentioned; and not the laws of the United States generally, but those ONLY 'which shall be made in pursuance' of the Constitution, have that rank.

"Thus, the particular phraseology of the Constitution of the United States confirms and strengthens the principle,...essential to all written constitutions, that a law repugnant to the Constitution is VOID, and that courts, as well as other departments, are bound by that instrument."

Marbury vs. Madison

So far, the 'compensation program' under the PREP Act has only agreed that a relative handful of (fewer than 100 if I recall correctly) of the hundreds of thousands injured by the products fraudulently labeled as "COVID-19 Vaccines" - with an average compensation per injured person of $2,300.

Note:

The PREP Act requires potential recipients to be FULLY INFORMED of the potential benefits & risks of accepting the product, and the extent to which these are unknown - and their right to refuse.

Did anyone you know who got one of the Covid jabs get this info before they went along with getting it?

Attorney Jeff Childers explains this and more on his June 26th blog at CoffeeandCovid.com

He has filed a lawsuit arguing that the PREP Act is unconstitutional. Linked there.

More on our rights regarding Covid 'mandates': CovidPenalty.com

As American hero Bobbie Anne Cox says, 'Knowledge is Power'.

Her Substack is also worth following.

P.S. - We should all get a pocket copy of the Constitution and the Declaration of Independence, keep them with us at all times, and READ them.

Expand full comment

Thunderous comment. One of the saddest things to me about this moment is the way the bar failed us when we needed them the most. I’m a dumb lawyer, but I was smart enough to have my hair stand on ends as I recognized the simple genius of so many things men have said in the Anglo-American legal tradition. But except for a small few, they all stepped aside in deference to The Science when it mattered most. Which reminds me that what really matters comes from within and that we have been rotting in that department for a long long time. Most lawyers now are simple-minded opportunists, chasing the paper. The common law was a faith of sorts, based in reason, a set of ideas to govern an ever changing world. At one time I believed it would hold us together. But everything decays if people decay.

Expand full comment

"Criminals" is the ONLY word I can describe these bastards!

Expand full comment

Rightfully so, his guy ( https://jeffreyprather.com/revealing-cabals-ufo-nuke-plan-to-coupe-trump/ 9:05) calls him Pedo (phile) Joe. Among those pardoned are at least one of the Pennsylvania kids-for-cash judges. ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Conahan ).

Expand full comment

As quickly as they put those "protections" in place for those evil companies, Trump/RFK Jr can

remove them. Unless it is an actual "law" that was passed by Congress and signed into law by the president, it can be changed on day 1.

There is nothing that the FJB regime has done that should not be undone.

Expand full comment

"There is nothing that the FJB regime has done that should not be undone."

Which begs the thought, much as I feel Trump, RFK Jr, Tulsi etc are INFINITELY better than the alternative, it begs the question...

Now that the protections have been extended to 2029 will it trigger an instant "day one" type reversal to show good faith for the alleged new agenda.... OR will it serve as convenient cover for a UniParty action and save the new "different" (time will tell) administration the hard unpleasant awkward work of going up against the Oligarchs of Oligarchs namely big Pharma?

Big Pharma pays a lot of the big bills, particularly the big bills of the senators and congressmen who do the voting. Let's see how wobbly they get when it all gets real and they realize their mistresses are going to be pissed off if pharma cuts them off.

I hate to be so untrusting and negative because believe me I want to believe. BUT, the total Peak Soviet level in me and millions of others I am sure has been well earned by the actions of the UniParty state that has abused us all our lives.

To be clear when I say "I reached Peak Soviet" it just means I no longer trust ANYTHING just like many of the eastern Europeans I know. They have hundreds of unbroken years of history horror to get that way. We in America may only have our short by comparison lives to reach Peak Soviet distrust status. Bio weapons attacks will do that.

So the question remains. Will the extended Pharma indemnity serve as a flash point of anger and rejection for the new regime or will it serve as convenient cover so the new regimes does not have to do the ugly work of getting in the face of Pharma and saying

"Time out. The free ride no consequences era of joy and looting for you guys is over. Nothing but pitchforks at the gates for you guys from here on every time you try to abuse us"

This is a put up or shut up moment and I for one will be watching very closely to see what the new regime does about the extended protections.

I say that reluctantly because I really want to believe we've turned a corner

But as they say, fool me once ... nay, fool us all our lives .. shame on us

Let's see what they do. We already know what the old regime will do, bring it all down by any means necessary.

The question is, will we actually have a NEW regime?

Expand full comment

Another unconscionable move by a government that someday will be held accountable.

Expand full comment

That’s ModeRNA, not Moderns.

Note the capitalization 😉

Expand full comment

Synthetic MODified RNA... Not natural messenger RNA: mRNA.

Expand full comment

Pure evil.

Expand full comment

Coincidental that the FDA (through the Biden, Obama and Clinton collaborative Presidency) has just extended Big Pharma's 'Licence to KILL' (= ZERO LIABILITY) LAW until 2030 - the same date Adiolf Schwab intends to have dehumanised the world's population with mRNA injections.

LIABILITY must be enforced before another person is injured or killed by injection of these poisonous 'experiments'.

Unjabbed Mick (UK) We'll live longer without interference from corrupt medics with syringes!

Expand full comment

The main difference in outlook between the opposing sides in the recent US election can in a sense be defined as “ideology based” - Harris and “reality based” - Trump.

That’s why the Harris (Soros/Rockefeller/Clinton/Obama) side has continually through its propagandist divisions tried to paint the Trump side as “ideology based” in terms of trying to make out his supporters are somehow “fascist or nazi white supremacists”, a most crass and

inaccurate attempt to slander.

Right now we have the fading “Biden” administration trying to let off big pharma for the evil they have perpetuated in the lockdown period.

With the excuse that they “need to do this given the high probability of more pandemics…blah blah”.

100 % criminal lying puppets yet the majority of people here in Western Europe wanted Harris to win.

That’s the power of the constant indoctrination of a highly controlled narrative - subtle and not so subtle - via schools, institutions, businesses and media.

Expand full comment

Corpses don’t sue…in five years they will be filling the FEMA trucks that just hightailed it out from here in Asheville…

Expand full comment

Who would expect anything else from the Biden-Obama-Clinton traitorous Mafia !!!

Expand full comment

All post-9-11 laws passed in haste (e.g. "Patriot" Act, "PREP" Act, AUMF, etc) should be herewith annulled!

Expand full comment