Only 4 counts!?? "The most egregious case" but yet has only a $100k bond and is released? I thought child pornography charges were one count for EACH picture/video in possession and this guy had THOUSANDS and even PRODUCED a CP video himself?
That's generally how it works, but you have to understand that there is sympathy within the prosecutor's offices and court systems for pedophiles. It is a close-knit community and they stick together. Also, when it comes down to it, they just consolidate charges and run sentences concurrently anyways. A Clark County, Nevada Deputy District Attorney was recently arrested for related crimes https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2023/10/16/las-vegas-prosecutor-faces-charges-after-luring-child-for-sex/71210625007/.
"Fair" and "speedy" are important qualifiers, and I did not mention sentencing, which should also be carefully considered if they are found to be guilty.
Without touching your current system, you could try out many Linux distros as live OS off a USB drive. If you go to Distrowatch, you will find the current popularity rankings, and should you take a closer look, each distro will have been evaluated by actual users (anything above 8 ought to deliver). There are also professional reviews, with Dedoimedo being a good source.
I go about with Puppy and/or Knoppix installed on thumb drives - can be used on any computer, on the fly, since they deploy in RAM. Once unplugged, there are no traces left.
Clarification: My last Windows OS was Vista. I have been using Linux for some twenty years, so take a lot of things for granted.
To start with, you need to download an .iso of the chosen OS; get the full version. Whether 32-bit or 64 does not matter much as long as your hardware is less than ten years old. On ancient stuff, 32 will work for sure.
Once you have the .iso, you need to write it to the USB stick (8 GB or better). I think on Windows this is best done with Etcher. The process should be smooth and straightforward.
With the USB stick made ready for action, you had better check the boot order of your computer - first in line must be "boot from USB device" or some such. To change the boot order, one of the F keys is used, usually F10, F12, or F7 - instructions flash briefly on the screen as the computer is being switched on.
Stick the thumb drive in, reboot, and Linux should come up singing and dancing. Reading and comprehension may be needed during the process, without rushing it. Should anything go wrong, just start from scratch.
The Nixon thing has a high user rating, but I suspect it may be cumbersome due to its complexity. TOR slows traffic down, and VM itself further increases the load to the system; I avoid using it due to my usually vintage hardware.
With a suitable live OS on USB stick, things tend to run quite fast, and the hard drive is not exercised much. As for Puppy, there is quite a kennel. You could try the Slackware pup: https://distro.ibiblio.org/puppylinux/puppy-slacko-7.0/32/
Get the .iso (largest file; md5 and/or sha256 are just to check integrity, which Etcher may do automatically), write it to the thumb drive, and try it out. If you like it, keep it; if not, grab another pup, or something else altogether; Linux Lite used to work OK while many would recommend Mint for crossover from Windows. Useful headings: https://www.forum.puppylinux.com/
The good news is, all these OSs can run off the USB stick, with no need to install. Should you come across one that you like using, the install option is often displayed right on the desktop. antiX (and most any other) will certainly run faster from the hard drive.
Thank you for sharing this. Never forget Seth Rich. It seems likely he is a martyr for truth and democracy. We should not rest until we know for sure. But in any case, prayers for him and his family to be taken at such a young age in such a brutal way.
Like so so many others. God Knows and will repay....it wont be fun for these evil psychopaths...SOON! Until then, where are the snipers when you need them? Forget 'fair 'trials, they dont exist anymore...not here, not now
This is really important, but how can the FBI turn all of that over to a court?
This is the Clinton-Machine we are talking about, and the FBI has been serving them.
Seth crossed the Clintons for defrauding Sanders voters in the primary and they shot him on the way home from a DNC office-party, forgetting to take his money in the "botched robbery" (at least to the best of my understanding).
Hello John Day MD: Well, erm... "Important"? The Federal Bureau of Investigation (Dun&Bradstreet # 878865674) is just as corrupt as the US Department of Justice (D&B # 011669674) The former government of the United States has been farmed out to corporate operatives for well over 75 years. The American public continues to doze, as the Bank for International Settlements, Bank of London, Rothschild Banking Services, BlackRock/Vanguard, and thousands of other racketeering operatives laugh. The dire situations they control via investment cartels and political blackmail, are endless.
That doesn't make sense that Dastardly Globalists would forget the detail of having the "robber" take his money. Whenever a conspiracy theory involves behavior that reflects an implausibly bumbling "Keystone Kabal", something may be wrong with the theory.
they never ever get the justice they deserve, always get off...the worse the crime the easier it seems to be for all of them, they dont have to be careful...its open season on the truth in the media, politcis...heck the world!
There was more to it than that: Two shots with .22, allegedly not life threatening; then hospital, and, poof! At the time, George Webb provided excellent walkabout on-location reportage if you can find it.
Yes, and the CIA is owned by the Rockefeller crime syndicate. At the top of the pyramid is the Bankster club. Rockefeller, Rothschild, and others. That's what happens when you allow private Banks to create our money supply. Unlimited power.
Right you are. The Evidence shows that the COVID19 SCAM- DEMIC was perpetrated by the Pentagon-CIA in order to penalize President Trump for his refusal to bait Russia into attacking Ukraine and his attacks on the “intelligence” agencies. He was also a threat to the civil servants aka the swamp.
Erm... You very obviously, have never left your mothers basement. The "scam" has been in the works since the days of Ronald Reagan (1981-1989) and were solidified within the PREP ACT under George W Bush. (2005) The results are 17 million world citizens dead, and hundreds of millions of injured. Mr Trump has very little to do with any sober analysis of the situation.
Secondarily to having zero government, I always root for transparency in government. Not that enough transparency would limit enough the evil it does at the bidding of the wealthiest people on the earth...
Well, it appears that the Deep State took President Trump’s threats serious enough . Two fake impeachments, stolen election, 4 phony indictments, a civil case designed to financially destroy him. And the Chinese are brewing a 2nd Covid 2 hoax in order to help their pal re-election effort. And so it goes.
Every bit of what we've seen the last decade or so is all theater. Every person is just playing their own part, to give the public the illusion that there are good guys vs bad guys, yet all the while, it's really the "elites/globalists/"the govt" (whatever you want to call "them" vs the We the People, the commoners". They must continue the show to keep people fighting each other (DIVIDE AND CONQUER, Bread and circuses) rather than wake up, UNITE and remove them all from "power".
Thank you for this update Celia. Many of us have long suspected that the truth of who murdered Seth and why would have completely destroyed the - "Putin hacked our democracy" - nonsense narrative peddled by the Democratic Party, deep state, and MSM - a narrative which rotted the brains of so many otherwise seemingly intelligent people. Exposing the truth of Seth's murder is HUGELY important.
Indeed. It has now been proposed on this thread, by Petra, that he was not murdered. Is there really no way to verify a death? Did Seth Rich have a funeral? Everything is questions, questions...
The Socialist Authoritarian Biden Junta will ignore the ruling . They hate the Constitution and the laws enacted pursuant thereof. And as long as he is the only demented SOB who supports the brain dead Ukrainian Proxy War the Pentagon- CIA will protect him. Sad
You sir are 100% Correct. Very few people understand that concept. Supreme Court Justice James Clark McReynolds declared in a dissenting opinion - Gold Clause Cases - that “ the Constitution is gone” . His dissenting opinion was CENSORED, SUPPRESSED- the first time ever that the powers that be censored a Supreme Court Opinion. Having said that and wholeheartedly agree with you I hope to restore and enforce the Constitution (1787) .
Yes indeed - for that reason the Founding Fathers REJECTED Democracy in favor of a Constitutional Republic. See Federalist 10. Tyranny by the majority is tyranny nevertheless.
"Many are speculating that what is about to be revealed is devastating enough that the rulers of darkness could actually pull the plug on the internet."
This theory reflects an interesting combination of implying weakness on the part of the Cabal, paradoxically simultaneous with implying great strength. The weakness would be indicated by the questions, why couldn't they figure out less drastic ways of preventing the evidence from coming out? Why couldn't they have simply destroyed the evidence from the beginning? And why couldn't they have gotten away with that? Not being able to do these things indicates weakness. Shutting down the Internet indicates then a strange capacity to do grandiose evil, given that they are apparently unable to simply destroy the evidence from the beginning and get away with it. Shutting down the Internet is no small thing.
Well the Deep State is a very interesting phenomenon- not every one in the swamp is dishonest- reason they came up with the “whistleblower statute”. Unfortunately the FBI has a very corrupt elite which they took to the Mar-A-Lago raid. They somehow got away with circumventing protocol by refusing to use S Florida agents nor the local US Attorney. Ain’t that some Shiite?
That is definitely on the cards - it will assist in the final hack and transfer of your wealth to 'them'. A Cyber Attack -as predicted by WEF's CyberPolygon- will be blamed on the Russians, no doubt, even though the Russian Federation hosted that event in 2020. Or it will be caused by Solar Flares: Blame it on NATURE.
Then they will 'save us' with rationing, UBI and whatever version of CBDC is appropriate in your country. Corporations now have their own 'coins'.
In this article they give us a heads up that Solar Flares will take down the internet for weeks. This will cause utter mayhem as everything is online. Notice they mention the Solar Maximum. We are in a SOLAR MINIMUM even though NASA claims the opposite.
Everything they tell you is inverted.
Earth will be bombarded by intense solar storms next YEAR: Scientists predict we'll reach 'solar maximum' in 2024 - with flares strong enough to CRIPPLE the world's INTERNET for WEEKS
The Internet is probably the main reason why the Cabal is succeeding in its long project of capturing the Western Mainstream, so I'm not sure they'd want to jeopardize that. But if a conspiracy theory endows the Cabal with supernatural omnipotence, then there's no point in theorizing.
True, but by the same token, the internet is the Cabal greatest threat, too. Without the internet, no one would've figured out the plandemic, the jabs bad, Pizzagate, etc, etc.
I'm less enthusiastic about the "figuring out" of these various conspiracies. In my estimation it's been a massively disorganized enterprise, mired in bewildering complexities, a denial of those complexities in the name of simplistic answers, and appallingly shoddy methodology in terms of adequately verifying the claims that are crucial in our ongoing efforts at piecing together the puzzles of these conspiracies.
The latter methodological problem has many unfortunate features, including a bewildering complexity of speculations; a kind of "Wild West" situation of authority with 1,000 cowboys taking the horns and no sheriff in town (which, while it has its advantages, also has disadvantages); a complete lack of quality control facilitating a florid almost hallucinogenic proliferation & profusion of batshit speculations by individuals many (if not most) of whom seem to have psychological problems; and on top of all this, a strange denial of all these problems.
I.e., if I were an advisor to the Cabal, I would have said the following:
"But Klaus, I understand your fears that an increased Internet is allowing the people to do their own research and investigations, but trust me, the disorganization and lack of quality control of their activities will far outweigh any danger they pose to our project of a New World Order. And of course, for good measure, we can always infiltrate with our controlled ops anyway."
As might be expected, the False Dilemma propaganda strategy used so very, very effectively for 9/11 (A. Terrrrrrrrorists, B. Big Bad US govt when it was really C. Big Bad US govt but death and injury faked) is a pretty popular technique and geez it works well, it's just amazing.
Just watch Seth's "grieving" family. This is a video from ABC and it's on YouTube, it's not from a psyop analyst but ABC. Check out what some of the commenters say and see if you agree.
when it was really C. all staged, no murder, he's been spotted in Israel supposedly but that's probably just another layer of propaganda itself ...
... so who is Seth Rich really? I think he could only be a Republican plant whose job was to screw up the Democrats' chance of winning the 2016 election ... and I have to say I can't help finding it amusing ... not because I have a clue about who is better in power if either side and wasn't invested either way (unlike an Australian living in NZ I recently met who bet a very significant sum on the election and was able to retire), I just find it amusing. Actually, I lie a little, I kind of liked the fact Trump got in although I really don't know why and ultimately I think they're all as bad as each other although I think these are interesting thoughts from therapist, David Sutcliffe. https://www.facebook.com/reel/2313333988849956
What I particularly find amusing is that the Republicans not only screwed over the Dems by having a plant expose them ... they made it look like the Dems murdered him ... and there's NOTHING the Dems could say because neither side ever calls the other out for their psyops, that's the rule, they cannot call each other out ... for obvious reasons. But then the Dems have seemingly screwed over the Republicans with the Jan 6 nonsense. I have no idea how it all works but they obviously conduct their battles at a level we're not privy to.
I keep my eyes wide open all the time. :) Will watch the video. Certainly, nothing is "too crazy."
We do agree Andrew Breitbart is dead, was murdered? High level pedophilia disclosure DOES seem to cause very real murders. Petra do you believe Isaac Kappy was murdered? What about Aviicci? One can get lost forever in this kind of thing. I was struck by the disturbing presence of Panda bears in Seth Rich photos.
No matter how much they use Revelation of the Method (ROTM) which is what I always rely on ... there ends up being ones I have no clue about although perhaps if I investigated them better the signs would be clear - then again it may be that there are no signs because whether the story is accurate or not, it isn't a case of a bona fide psyop which always employs ROTM - no matter whether it's four centuries ago in the Great Fire of London (https://off-guardian.org/2019/09/01/the-great-fire-of-london-cui-bono/) or next week in Mumbai. Don't know about Isaac Kappy, Aviici or Chester Bennington nor Andrew Breitbart. Yes, one of the commenters on the Seth Rich video amused me with:
"WALLS COVERED WITH DISNEY AND MOM, HOLDING A GD PANDA! C'mon people."
But guess who I very recently did discover didn't die? Kary Mullis ... or at least there's no reason to think he did. It's so interesting that even when you know all the tricks and you know how they use Revelation of the Method you still get sucked in. I thought Kary was a hero and watched his interview with Gary Null at least twice. In it he says, "The scientist aims to prove their hypothesis wrong," which remain very wise words and what I realised I try to do (as a non-scientist) without being conscious of it.
However, after reading the substack by Proton Magic revealing that Kary is a fraud (https://protonmagic.substack.com/p/mullis-the-movie-star) I was prompted to review a TED talk he'd given where he gave an entertaining account of making rockets as a teenager. I posted this comment on PM's article.
"In Kary's talk on his teenage rocket-making days he says that he put little piles of mixtures with different ratios of potassium nitrate and sugar and bingo! he found 50/50 KNO3/sugar worked best. He then clarified that that was by volume although by weight it was 60/40 - he didn't say which way, however, I looked up "sugar rocket fuel" and it says 60 KNO3 / 40 sugar. I looked up the densities of KNO3 and sugar and KNO3 is actually denser which - according to my reckoning - means that if you were going by volume 50/50 wouldn't be correct - it would go more in 70/30 direction not even up. Also, he says the father of a friend named Buzz was a pilot and flew at 2 miles above the sand pit a cop had directed the boys to experiment with their rockets at but in fact their rockets exceeded that height which strikes me as implausible ... as does a friend's father flying his plane above the sand pit as a means of testing how high the rocket went.
I do like the friend called Buzz ... oh and guess what? Buzz Aldrin's father was an aviator and assistant commandant of the Army's first test pilot school at McCook Field, Ohio, from 1919 to 1922."
Just to clarify, Celia, the ONE event I do believe is the moon landings and I think it's a shame that so many disbelieve or doubt that astonishing achievement. What's so interesting about the moon landings is that they show that those who disbelieve them simply don't know how to look at the evidence properly. They judge by their seeming implausibility and their inclination-to-disbelieve bias rather than the evidence and they overestimate their knowledge and understanding of space and space travel - there's dangers in independent thinking - you need to know your limits.
Setting aside the KNO3/sugar ratio anomaly which clearly isn't going to be obvious at first sight unless you're familiar with the subject matter it was still a rather implausible-sounding story and the bit about Buzz and his pilot father flying 2 miles over the sandpit is simply ridiculous! I did think it strange that the factcheckers put forward that Kary's wife aligned with them in their claims that Kary was referring to HIV when he said that the PCR can't tell you if you're sick because even though he was talking about HIV there was no reason to think he wasn't speaking in general terms about PCR and I wondered why his wife aligned with the factcheckers ... but no longer! And now I'm really not sure about the PCR technique in any capacity.
PETRA! MOON LANDING BELIEVER?!? C'mon - I grew up in the 1960s & the tech back then was way backwards... even crazy simple in terms of any possible long trip space / rocket travel. Geez.
So no need to even argue photos, space suits, oversized Moon Buggy or fuel tanks' capacity.. Or mention NASA & Stanley Kubrick known collaborations, moon lighting anomalies, slow motion astronauts, NASA film out-takes & BOGUS moon rocks,
So many actual tells that your belief "it was real" is both funny & mind-boggling.
> A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon - Bart Sibrel (Apr 14, 2013)
Tell me & others here how ya can do a "technological feat" without the technology? Interested to know what you think of this hard evidence against moon trips/landings.
Oh yes I've seen American Moon. Seems quite convincing at first sight, however, the answer to every question asked by Mazzucco can easily be accommodated by the "we went" hypothesis. I do wonder about Mazzucco. Is he some kind of agent? He tells us 9/11 was an inside job ... but not the kind of inside job it really was and he tells us we didn't go to the moon ... when we clearly did. See answers to all his questions below.
You could never fake landing on the moon with any credibility, the conditions are too alien notably black sky against a brilliantly sunlit surface - they went at lunar dawn. Can't fake that at least not back then and not convincingly in thousands of photos from 6 missions. But the point is if it could be faked ... we see no signs of it and in psyops they always TELL us underneath the propaganda Revelation-of-the-Method (ROTM) style. What I want to know is why has no disbeliever of the moon landings ever pointed out the astounding anomaly that there are no ROTM signs in the moon landings while in every other psyop known to man there are ROTM signs.
When I went to see First Man at the cinema I anticipated that the light density wouldn't seem quite as strong as we see in the Apollo photos and my judgement is that it isn't (although perhaps that's bias). I heard that the director said he thinks it would have been easier to go to the moon itself and film it rather than what he had to go through to fake it ... and I can see where he's coming from.
I do not do reddit, and am not invested in the moon landing either way. But, sittiíng on the fence, my leg is being heavily pulled to the negative side. I viewed and reviewed the American Moon dispassionately. Regardless of what Mazzucco might say, I could easily watch the movie with sound muted, and just concentrate on the visuals. End result would be the same. I know how to look at pictures, lighting, shadows and angles; the optics are damning. Then there is the physical issue of Van Allen belts, which is a hard nut to crack.
You've inspired me to repost the debunking from reddit (credited, of course) with the title American Moon (2017): superficially challenging, however, I don't expect you to read it as you say you're not invested and you seem content to simply sit on the fence with your leg on the negative side which is perfectly reasonable.
Critics of people they label "conspiracy theorists" accuse them of the Dunning-Kruger effect (overestimating one's abilities) and I'm afraid I don't think that's a totally unfair claim. There are dangers in being an independent thinker. While, of course, independent thinking is desirable and certainly necessary in order to determine all the lies we are told, we can take it too far. Perhaps I'm blessed in feeling pretty clueless about lots of things so my approach is always:
--- follow the debunking trail as far as it goes if there is one (or otherwise check every way you can that your chosen hypothesis is correct)
--- confine analysis to the irrefutable facts in the first instance
I think by following the above rules you simply cannot fail to accept the reality of the moon landings and every single disbeliever of the moon landings I have ever encountered certainly does not follow those rules, including my identical twin sister. While my sister and I are equally willing to disbelieve the authorities that is where our similarity in thinking completely ends and I've realised I simply cannot discuss anything with her any more as our thinking is just so different. One of her main arguments against the moon landings: she works in IT and she knows that software never succeeds first time so they couldn't have succeeded first time landing on the moon. And - like so many others - she places so very much importance on the fact astronauts haven't gone again. I really don't understand why people think we should have gone again but the argument simply falls into the logical fallacy argumentum ad speculum or hypothesis contrary to fact ... but my sister doesn't care about logical fallacies so right there you have someone you cannot really discuss things with.
None of this is news. >>> Journalist Whitney Webb sits down with Redacted's Clayton Morris for a dense conversation exposing Jeffrey Epstein's deep connections to the world's biggest power players. >>> She's EXPOSING how the deep state mafia controls all of us | Redacted Conversation w/ Whitney Webb >>> December 31, 2022 >>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q28wkPhMQrY
The agencies involved are still quite operational…
The Evidence shows that Epstein was employed by the Mossad . They blackmailed the perverts afterwards. Of course , I won’t disclose the evidence because I don’t want to be accused of “anti-semitism” 🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄
https://x.com/islantstudio/status/1729533474162323682?s=20
Several Pizzagate debunkers in media have been arrested and charged with child porn possession and worse.
Only 4 counts!?? "The most egregious case" but yet has only a $100k bond and is released? I thought child pornography charges were one count for EACH picture/video in possession and this guy had THOUSANDS and even PRODUCED a CP video himself?
Can you say J Epstein? Or perhaps Bill Clinton of course lnclude the Mrs C in justice missing files
That's generally how it works, but you have to understand that there is sympathy within the prosecutor's offices and court systems for pedophiles. It is a close-knit community and they stick together. Also, when it comes down to it, they just consolidate charges and run sentences concurrently anyways. A Clark County, Nevada Deputy District Attorney was recently arrested for related crimes https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2023/10/16/las-vegas-prosecutor-faces-charges-after-luring-child-for-sex/71210625007/.
Sickening 😫
I wish them a fair and speedy trial.
:-)
I DONT
Neither do I. Any connection between the courts' system and justice is more pretense than real :(
I’m just through with morons full stop!!
Sarcasm appears lost on some
hell is too good
I agree if you mean, guilty and no more hanging around for us to pay for their room and board for decades. Quick Trial!
"Fair" and "speedy" are important qualifiers, and I did not mention sentencing, which should also be carefully considered if they are found to be guilty.
How might society's children best be protected?
If you're asking for a copy of the 11/28/23 Judges order from Ty Clevingers X post here's the pdf link he posted
https://lawflog.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/2023.11.28-Order-on-laptops.pdf
People say, nitter for twitter. But it comes from github, which is contaminated by Microsoft, so I would not touch either.
As for device security, Linux without systemd is the first step.
Without touching your current system, you could try out many Linux distros as live OS off a USB drive. If you go to Distrowatch, you will find the current popularity rankings, and should you take a closer look, each distro will have been evaluated by actual users (anything above 8 ought to deliver). There are also professional reviews, with Dedoimedo being a good source.
I go about with Puppy and/or Knoppix installed on thumb drives - can be used on any computer, on the fly, since they deploy in RAM. Once unplugged, there are no traces left.
For permanent installation, my OS of choice is antiX but that will depend on the hardware in conjunction with personal preferences. You could try it out live: https://antixlinux.com/the-most-extensive-live-usb-on-the-planet/
No systemd; TOR part of package; download YT vids via SMTube, and watch them clean, offline, etc.
MX Linux, which tops the popularity contest at Distrowatch, is a cousin of antiX; I think I like the layout of the latter better, though.
Thank you, I've been considering this for my windows 7 that works fine other than sites keep saying they don't work with certain things.
Clarification: My last Windows OS was Vista. I have been using Linux for some twenty years, so take a lot of things for granted.
To start with, you need to download an .iso of the chosen OS; get the full version. Whether 32-bit or 64 does not matter much as long as your hardware is less than ten years old. On ancient stuff, 32 will work for sure.
Once you have the .iso, you need to write it to the USB stick (8 GB or better). I think on Windows this is best done with Etcher. The process should be smooth and straightforward.
With the USB stick made ready for action, you had better check the boot order of your computer - first in line must be "boot from USB device" or some such. To change the boot order, one of the F keys is used, usually F10, F12, or F7 - instructions flash briefly on the screen as the computer is being switched on.
Stick the thumb drive in, reboot, and Linux should come up singing and dancing. Reading and comprehension may be needed during the process, without rushing it. Should anything go wrong, just start from scratch.
The Nixon thing has a high user rating, but I suspect it may be cumbersome due to its complexity. TOR slows traffic down, and VM itself further increases the load to the system; I avoid using it due to my usually vintage hardware.
With a suitable live OS on USB stick, things tend to run quite fast, and the hard drive is not exercised much. As for Puppy, there is quite a kennel. You could try the Slackware pup: https://distro.ibiblio.org/puppylinux/puppy-slacko-7.0/32/
Get the .iso (largest file; md5 and/or sha256 are just to check integrity, which Etcher may do automatically), write it to the thumb drive, and try it out. If you like it, keep it; if not, grab another pup, or something else altogether; Linux Lite used to work OK while many would recommend Mint for crossover from Windows. Useful headings: https://www.forum.puppylinux.com/
The good news is, all these OSs can run off the USB stick, with no need to install. Should you come across one that you like using, the install option is often displayed right on the desktop. antiX (and most any other) will certainly run faster from the hard drive.
Thank you for sharing this. Never forget Seth Rich. It seems likely he is a martyr for truth and democracy. We should not rest until we know for sure. But in any case, prayers for him and his family to be taken at such a young age in such a brutal way.
Like so so many others. God Knows and will repay....it wont be fun for these evil psychopaths...SOON! Until then, where are the snipers when you need them? Forget 'fair 'trials, they dont exist anymore...not here, not now
The family was on the dodgy side as you will see if you go back in history.
This is really important, but how can the FBI turn all of that over to a court?
This is the Clinton-Machine we are talking about, and the FBI has been serving them.
Seth crossed the Clintons for defrauding Sanders voters in the primary and they shot him on the way home from a DNC office-party, forgetting to take his money in the "botched robbery" (at least to the best of my understanding).
I can't quite imagine it either, but let's stay positive.
And there might actually be some geomagnetic storm activity Friday and Saturday.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0kg3QZRExgc
YES! SUN blowing off at earth!!! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TWwRfhK3Yo0&list=TLPQMzAxMTIwMjNTpocP7vJa8w&index=2
I know right?
Hello John Day MD: Well, erm... "Important"? The Federal Bureau of Investigation (Dun&Bradstreet # 878865674) is just as corrupt as the US Department of Justice (D&B # 011669674) The former government of the United States has been farmed out to corporate operatives for well over 75 years. The American public continues to doze, as the Bank for International Settlements, Bank of London, Rothschild Banking Services, BlackRock/Vanguard, and thousands of other racketeering operatives laugh. The dire situations they control via investment cartels and political blackmail, are endless.
What Is the Global Public-Private Partnership >>> IAIN DAVIS >>> OCTOBER 6, 2021 >>> https://iaindavis.com/what-is-the-global-public-private-partnership/ >>> Click The Image To Expand >>> The article is a masterpiece.
That doesn't make sense that Dastardly Globalists would forget the detail of having the "robber" take his money. Whenever a conspiracy theory involves behavior that reflects an implausibly bumbling "Keystone Kabal", something may be wrong with the theory.
they never ever get the justice they deserve, always get off...the worse the crime the easier it seems to be for all of them, they dont have to be careful...its open season on the truth in the media, politcis...heck the world!
There was more to it than that: Two shots with .22, allegedly not life threatening; then hospital, and, poof! At the time, George Webb provided excellent walkabout on-location reportage if you can find it.
"Sundance" has this: https://theconservativetreehouse.com/blog/2023/11/29/potentially-important-but-the-deep-state-interests-are-massive-judge-rules-contents-of-seth-rich-laptop-must-be-released/
Interesting.
Yes, and the CIA is owned by the Rockefeller crime syndicate. At the top of the pyramid is the Bankster club. Rockefeller, Rothschild, and others. That's what happens when you allow private Banks to create our money supply. Unlimited power.
Right you are. The Evidence shows that the COVID19 SCAM- DEMIC was perpetrated by the Pentagon-CIA in order to penalize President Trump for his refusal to bait Russia into attacking Ukraine and his attacks on the “intelligence” agencies. He was also a threat to the civil servants aka the swamp.
Erm... You very obviously, have never left your mothers basement. The "scam" has been in the works since the days of Ronald Reagan (1981-1989) and were solidified within the PREP ACT under George W Bush. (2005) The results are 17 million world citizens dead, and hundreds of millions of injured. Mr Trump has very little to do with any sober analysis of the situation.
US federal crimes for which there is evidence to prosecute Covid-19 bioterrorists who occupy US government positions. >>> KATHERINE WATT >>> AUG 9, 2022 >>> https://bailiwicknews.substack.com/p/us-federal-crimes-for-which-there
Secondarily to having zero government, I always root for transparency in government. Not that enough transparency would limit enough the evil it does at the bidding of the wealthiest people on the earth...
Free Julian Assange.
There clearly is something very important & damaging in those case files & laptop that the corrupt FBI-Stasi does not want made public !!!!!!!
Of course. But the Lazy incompetent Civil “servants” prefer to have a friend in the Whitehouse as opposed to one who will drain the swamp.
And 'he' locked her up , right? all bait and switchcraft for the masses
Well, it appears that the Deep State took President Trump’s threats serious enough . Two fake impeachments, stolen election, 4 phony indictments, a civil case designed to financially destroy him. And the Chinese are brewing a 2nd Covid 2 hoax in order to help their pal re-election effort. And so it goes.
Every bit of what we've seen the last decade or so is all theater. Every person is just playing their own part, to give the public the illusion that there are good guys vs bad guys, yet all the while, it's really the "elites/globalists/"the govt" (whatever you want to call "them" vs the We the People, the commoners". They must continue the show to keep people fighting each other (DIVIDE AND CONQUER, Bread and circuses) rather than wake up, UNITE and remove them all from "power".
Thank you for this update Celia. Many of us have long suspected that the truth of who murdered Seth and why would have completely destroyed the - "Putin hacked our democracy" - nonsense narrative peddled by the Democratic Party, deep state, and MSM - a narrative which rotted the brains of so many otherwise seemingly intelligent people. Exposing the truth of Seth's murder is HUGELY important.
Indeed. It has now been proposed on this thread, by Petra, that he was not murdered. Is there really no way to verify a death? Did Seth Rich have a funeral? Everything is questions, questions...
I was thinking this same thing, but thought best not to share since it is so "out there".I
I do wonder.
I did a lot of reading and watching about Seth Rich a few years back when George Webb reporting about it on his youtube site.
There was a bit of speculation at the time of Seth not being dead.
Absolutely nothing surprises me anymore.
Not to be a debbie downer but I can't imagine that these laptops will reveal much.
I think the deep state is deeper than I ever imagined.
As I recall, family refused exhumation and autopsy. No body, no crime?
The judgement recommended a timeline be produced for the release of the stuff.
Haha, these judges are so slick. Watch the FBI say ok, we will release it in 75 years in their timeline.
Yup , those spineless “judges” are weak as water
The Socialist Authoritarian Biden Junta will ignore the ruling . They hate the Constitution and the laws enacted pursuant thereof. And as long as he is the only demented SOB who supports the brain dead Ukrainian Proxy War the Pentagon- CIA will protect him. Sad
How is the Constitution relevant if the Republic was bankrupted and dissolved by The Emergency Banking Act 1932?
"The "U.S. Government" Went Bankrupt in 1933 and is No Longer a Republic"
https://famguardian.org/Subjects/LawAndGovt/LegalEthics/Corruption/USGovtBankrupt.htm
You sir are 100% Correct. Very few people understand that concept. Supreme Court Justice James Clark McReynolds declared in a dissenting opinion - Gold Clause Cases - that “ the Constitution is gone” . His dissenting opinion was CENSORED, SUPPRESSED- the first time ever that the powers that be censored a Supreme Court Opinion. Having said that and wholeheartedly agree with you I hope to restore and enforce the Constitution (1787) .
I wholeheartedly share your hope!
https://constitution.solari.com/
"Our democracy" lol! Fraud upon fraud upon fraud!
Yes indeed - for that reason the Founding Fathers REJECTED Democracy in favor of a Constitutional Republic. See Federalist 10. Tyranny by the majority is tyranny nevertheless.
"Many are speculating that what is about to be revealed is devastating enough that the rulers of darkness could actually pull the plug on the internet."
This theory reflects an interesting combination of implying weakness on the part of the Cabal, paradoxically simultaneous with implying great strength. The weakness would be indicated by the questions, why couldn't they figure out less drastic ways of preventing the evidence from coming out? Why couldn't they have simply destroyed the evidence from the beginning? And why couldn't they have gotten away with that? Not being able to do these things indicates weakness. Shutting down the Internet indicates then a strange capacity to do grandiose evil, given that they are apparently unable to simply destroy the evidence from the beginning and get away with it. Shutting down the Internet is no small thing.
Well the Deep State is a very interesting phenomenon- not every one in the swamp is dishonest- reason they came up with the “whistleblower statute”. Unfortunately the FBI has a very corrupt elite which they took to the Mar-A-Lago raid. They somehow got away with circumventing protocol by refusing to use S Florida agents nor the local US Attorney. Ain’t that some Shiite?
That is definitely on the cards - it will assist in the final hack and transfer of your wealth to 'them'. A Cyber Attack -as predicted by WEF's CyberPolygon- will be blamed on the Russians, no doubt, even though the Russian Federation hosted that event in 2020. Or it will be caused by Solar Flares: Blame it on NATURE.
Then they will 'save us' with rationing, UBI and whatever version of CBDC is appropriate in your country. Corporations now have their own 'coins'.
In this article they give us a heads up that Solar Flares will take down the internet for weeks. This will cause utter mayhem as everything is online. Notice they mention the Solar Maximum. We are in a SOLAR MINIMUM even though NASA claims the opposite.
Everything they tell you is inverted.
Earth will be bombarded by intense solar storms next YEAR: Scientists predict we'll reach 'solar maximum' in 2024 - with flares strong enough to CRIPPLE the world's INTERNET for WEEKS
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-12804015/Earth-bombarded-intense-solar-storms-YEAR-Scientists-predict-reach-solar-maximum-2024-flares-strong-cripple-worlds-internet-WEEKS.html
Gradual onset of the Maunder Minimum revealed by high-precision carbon-14 analyses
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-021-84830-5
The Internet is probably the main reason why the Cabal is succeeding in its long project of capturing the Western Mainstream, so I'm not sure they'd want to jeopardize that. But if a conspiracy theory endows the Cabal with supernatural omnipotence, then there's no point in theorizing.
True, but by the same token, the internet is the Cabal greatest threat, too. Without the internet, no one would've figured out the plandemic, the jabs bad, Pizzagate, etc, etc.
I'm less enthusiastic about the "figuring out" of these various conspiracies. In my estimation it's been a massively disorganized enterprise, mired in bewildering complexities, a denial of those complexities in the name of simplistic answers, and appallingly shoddy methodology in terms of adequately verifying the claims that are crucial in our ongoing efforts at piecing together the puzzles of these conspiracies.
The latter methodological problem has many unfortunate features, including a bewildering complexity of speculations; a kind of "Wild West" situation of authority with 1,000 cowboys taking the horns and no sheriff in town (which, while it has its advantages, also has disadvantages); a complete lack of quality control facilitating a florid almost hallucinogenic proliferation & profusion of batshit speculations by individuals many (if not most) of whom seem to have psychological problems; and on top of all this, a strange denial of all these problems.
I.e., if I were an advisor to the Cabal, I would have said the following:
"But Klaus, I understand your fears that an increased Internet is allowing the people to do their own research and investigations, but trust me, the disorganization and lack of quality control of their activities will far outweigh any danger they pose to our project of a New World Order. And of course, for good measure, we can always infiltrate with our controlled ops anyway."
https://x.com/Ultrafrog17/status/1730288745541218450?s=20
The US is so stinking corrupt it isn't real.
14 days? with all the time they've had, a couple of hours should be enough
As might be expected, the False Dilemma propaganda strategy used so very, very effectively for 9/11 (A. Terrrrrrrrorists, B. Big Bad US govt when it was really C. Big Bad US govt but death and injury faked) is a pretty popular technique and geez it works well, it's just amazing.
Just watch Seth's "grieving" family. This is a video from ABC and it's on YouTube, it's not from a psyop analyst but ABC. Check out what some of the commenters say and see if you agree.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LOn09bhDXMo
False Dilemma
A. Ludicrous random person/people story
B. Big Bad Dems
when it was really C. all staged, no murder, he's been spotted in Israel supposedly but that's probably just another layer of propaganda itself ...
... so who is Seth Rich really? I think he could only be a Republican plant whose job was to screw up the Democrats' chance of winning the 2016 election ... and I have to say I can't help finding it amusing ... not because I have a clue about who is better in power if either side and wasn't invested either way (unlike an Australian living in NZ I recently met who bet a very significant sum on the election and was able to retire), I just find it amusing. Actually, I lie a little, I kind of liked the fact Trump got in although I really don't know why and ultimately I think they're all as bad as each other although I think these are interesting thoughts from therapist, David Sutcliffe. https://www.facebook.com/reel/2313333988849956
What I particularly find amusing is that the Republicans not only screwed over the Dems by having a plant expose them ... they made it look like the Dems murdered him ... and there's NOTHING the Dems could say because neither side ever calls the other out for their psyops, that's the rule, they cannot call each other out ... for obvious reasons. But then the Dems have seemingly screwed over the Republicans with the Jan 6 nonsense. I have no idea how it all works but they obviously conduct their battles at a level we're not privy to.
I keep my eyes wide open all the time. :) Will watch the video. Certainly, nothing is "too crazy."
We do agree Andrew Breitbart is dead, was murdered? High level pedophilia disclosure DOES seem to cause very real murders. Petra do you believe Isaac Kappy was murdered? What about Aviicci? One can get lost forever in this kind of thing. I was struck by the disturbing presence of Panda bears in Seth Rich photos.
No matter how much they use Revelation of the Method (ROTM) which is what I always rely on ... there ends up being ones I have no clue about although perhaps if I investigated them better the signs would be clear - then again it may be that there are no signs because whether the story is accurate or not, it isn't a case of a bona fide psyop which always employs ROTM - no matter whether it's four centuries ago in the Great Fire of London (https://off-guardian.org/2019/09/01/the-great-fire-of-london-cui-bono/) or next week in Mumbai. Don't know about Isaac Kappy, Aviici or Chester Bennington nor Andrew Breitbart. Yes, one of the commenters on the Seth Rich video amused me with:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LOn09bhDXMo
"WALLS COVERED WITH DISNEY AND MOM, HOLDING A GD PANDA! C'mon people."
But guess who I very recently did discover didn't die? Kary Mullis ... or at least there's no reason to think he did. It's so interesting that even when you know all the tricks and you know how they use Revelation of the Method you still get sucked in. I thought Kary was a hero and watched his interview with Gary Null at least twice. In it he says, "The scientist aims to prove their hypothesis wrong," which remain very wise words and what I realised I try to do (as a non-scientist) without being conscious of it.
2 hr 1996 interview with Gary Null - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W1FXbxDrDrY
However, after reading the substack by Proton Magic revealing that Kary is a fraud (https://protonmagic.substack.com/p/mullis-the-movie-star) I was prompted to review a TED talk he'd given where he gave an entertaining account of making rockets as a teenager. I posted this comment on PM's article.
"In Kary's talk on his teenage rocket-making days he says that he put little piles of mixtures with different ratios of potassium nitrate and sugar and bingo! he found 50/50 KNO3/sugar worked best. He then clarified that that was by volume although by weight it was 60/40 - he didn't say which way, however, I looked up "sugar rocket fuel" and it says 60 KNO3 / 40 sugar. I looked up the densities of KNO3 and sugar and KNO3 is actually denser which - according to my reckoning - means that if you were going by volume 50/50 wouldn't be correct - it would go more in 70/30 direction not even up. Also, he says the father of a friend named Buzz was a pilot and flew at 2 miles above the sand pit a cop had directed the boys to experiment with their rockets at but in fact their rockets exceeded that height which strikes me as implausible ... as does a friend's father flying his plane above the sand pit as a means of testing how high the rocket went.
https://youtu.be/iSVy1b-RyVM?si=xO2TeGqfxSWE0Sjb&t=418
I do like the friend called Buzz ... oh and guess what? Buzz Aldrin's father was an aviator and assistant commandant of the Army's first test pilot school at McCook Field, Ohio, from 1919 to 1922."
Just to clarify, Celia, the ONE event I do believe is the moon landings and I think it's a shame that so many disbelieve or doubt that astonishing achievement. What's so interesting about the moon landings is that they show that those who disbelieve them simply don't know how to look at the evidence properly. They judge by their seeming implausibility and their inclination-to-disbelieve bias rather than the evidence and they overestimate their knowledge and understanding of space and space travel - there's dangers in independent thinking - you need to know your limits.
Setting aside the KNO3/sugar ratio anomaly which clearly isn't going to be obvious at first sight unless you're familiar with the subject matter it was still a rather implausible-sounding story and the bit about Buzz and his pilot father flying 2 miles over the sandpit is simply ridiculous! I did think it strange that the factcheckers put forward that Kary's wife aligned with them in their claims that Kary was referring to HIV when he said that the PCR can't tell you if you're sick because even though he was talking about HIV there was no reason to think he wasn't speaking in general terms about PCR and I wondered why his wife aligned with the factcheckers ... but no longer! And now I'm really not sure about the PCR technique in any capacity.
PETRA! MOON LANDING BELIEVER?!? C'mon - I grew up in the 1960s & the tech back then was way backwards... even crazy simple in terms of any possible long trip space / rocket travel. Geez.
So no need to even argue photos, space suits, oversized Moon Buggy or fuel tanks' capacity.. Or mention NASA & Stanley Kubrick known collaborations, moon lighting anomalies, slow motion astronauts, NASA film out-takes & BOGUS moon rocks,
So many actual tells that your belief "it was real" is both funny & mind-boggling.
> A Funny Thing Happened on the Way to the Moon - Bart Sibrel (Apr 14, 2013)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xciCJfbTvE4 (plus see mirror below too)
> A Funny Thing Happened On The Way To The Moon - Bart Sebril & Janet Ossebaard - BeyondTheCurtain (posted January 2nd, 2024)
https://www.bitchute.com/video/cxP0uYea1sxs/
Description here says: Narrated by the late Janet Ossebaard, who was recently suicided. I would donate to a statue of her. Released in 2001.
Plus, lots of observational facts/truth bombs here that you just can't argue against.
> Wagging the Moondoggie: Part I - by Dave McGowan | Oct 1, 2009
http://centerforaninformedamerica.com/moondoggie-1/
Tell me & others here how ya can do a "technological feat" without the technology? Interested to know what you think of this hard evidence against moon trips/landings.
;-)
Now we are talking! Mullis has nothing on Moon, and Putin is bemused. Bring out the AI! https://greekreporter.com/2023/11/29/ai-analysis-us-moon-landing-images-fake/
Just joking. To get serious, watch American Moon by Mazzucco. That is the right stuff.
Oh yes I've seen American Moon. Seems quite convincing at first sight, however, the answer to every question asked by Mazzucco can easily be accommodated by the "we went" hypothesis. I do wonder about Mazzucco. Is he some kind of agent? He tells us 9/11 was an inside job ... but not the kind of inside job it really was and he tells us we didn't go to the moon ... when we clearly did. See answers to all his questions below.
https://www.reddit.com/r/SensibleSite/comments/eqfeqs/debunking_american_moon
https://www.reddit.com/r/SensibleSite/comments/i1rkbp/debunking_american_moon_part_2
You could never fake landing on the moon with any credibility, the conditions are too alien notably black sky against a brilliantly sunlit surface - they went at lunar dawn. Can't fake that at least not back then and not convincingly in thousands of photos from 6 missions. But the point is if it could be faked ... we see no signs of it and in psyops they always TELL us underneath the propaganda Revelation-of-the-Method (ROTM) style. What I want to know is why has no disbeliever of the moon landings ever pointed out the astounding anomaly that there are no ROTM signs in the moon landings while in every other psyop known to man there are ROTM signs.
When I went to see First Man at the cinema I anticipated that the light density wouldn't seem quite as strong as we see in the Apollo photos and my judgement is that it isn't (although perhaps that's bias). I heard that the director said he thinks it would have been easier to go to the moon itself and film it rather than what he had to go through to fake it ... and I can see where he's coming from.
I do not do reddit, and am not invested in the moon landing either way. But, sittiíng on the fence, my leg is being heavily pulled to the negative side. I viewed and reviewed the American Moon dispassionately. Regardless of what Mazzucco might say, I could easily watch the movie with sound muted, and just concentrate on the visuals. End result would be the same. I know how to look at pictures, lighting, shadows and angles; the optics are damning. Then there is the physical issue of Van Allen belts, which is a hard nut to crack.
You've inspired me to repost the debunking from reddit (credited, of course) with the title American Moon (2017): superficially challenging, however, I don't expect you to read it as you say you're not invested and you seem content to simply sit on the fence with your leg on the negative side which is perfectly reasonable.
https://petraliverani.substack.com/p/american-moon-2017-superficially
Critics of people they label "conspiracy theorists" accuse them of the Dunning-Kruger effect (overestimating one's abilities) and I'm afraid I don't think that's a totally unfair claim. There are dangers in being an independent thinker. While, of course, independent thinking is desirable and certainly necessary in order to determine all the lies we are told, we can take it too far. Perhaps I'm blessed in feeling pretty clueless about lots of things so my approach is always:
--- follow the debunking trail as far as it goes if there is one (or otherwise check every way you can that your chosen hypothesis is correct)
--- confine analysis to the irrefutable facts in the first instance
I think by following the above rules you simply cannot fail to accept the reality of the moon landings and every single disbeliever of the moon landings I have ever encountered certainly does not follow those rules, including my identical twin sister. While my sister and I are equally willing to disbelieve the authorities that is where our similarity in thinking completely ends and I've realised I simply cannot discuss anything with her any more as our thinking is just so different. One of her main arguments against the moon landings: she works in IT and she knows that software never succeeds first time so they couldn't have succeeded first time landing on the moon. And - like so many others - she places so very much importance on the fact astronauts haven't gone again. I really don't understand why people think we should have gone again but the argument simply falls into the logical fallacy argumentum ad speculum or hypothesis contrary to fact ... but my sister doesn't care about logical fallacies so right there you have someone you cannot really discuss things with.
Who's C?
None of this is news. >>> Journalist Whitney Webb sits down with Redacted's Clayton Morris for a dense conversation exposing Jeffrey Epstein's deep connections to the world's biggest power players. >>> She's EXPOSING how the deep state mafia controls all of us | Redacted Conversation w/ Whitney Webb >>> December 31, 2022 >>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q28wkPhMQrY
The agencies involved are still quite operational…
The Evidence shows that Epstein was employed by the Mossad . They blackmailed the perverts afterwards. Of course , I won’t disclose the evidence because I don’t want to be accused of “anti-semitism” 🙄🙄🙄🙄🙄
Ah, the old, attempted, "Route 66 treatment." But they got the Interstate-40 superhighway in response.
Beep beep, Mr. Wiley E. Coyote..