Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Celia Farber's avatar

I think I am an outlier on this but I have always found it jarring and rude when people act like it was owed to them not to have an entirely other person post something they themselves did not like. To be intense and insulting about it. I would simply say nothing, move on.

Sophia's avatar

I’ve watched the first 36 minutes so far and at a gut level don’t feel that John Kiriakou is being genuine or truthful when saying that he was shocked by what’s in the Epstein files. His background is CIA, right? Come on, John. Child trafficking, torture, MK Ultra. SRA, arms dealing, espionage, money laundering, honey traps, blackmail, eugenics. These crimes are known to have been perpetrated and explored by the CIA, politicians, globalists, and the elite for decades. For anyone in the CIA to be surprised makes zero sense to me. And then he repeats the same question over and over: What kind of judgment do these people have? That’s a ridiculous question. The perpetrators of crimes against humanity are living satanic lives of service to their dark lords in exchange for a certain level of power, money, and the ability to satiate their debauched cravings without being held accountable so asking what kind of judgment they have seems idiotic to me. He seems like just another “playa” on the world media stage. That said, I will watch a little longer to see if things improve. I don’t mean my comments to be insulting, Celia. I’m just responding sincerely with points of discussion regarding the interview content.

19 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?