Diana West On Robert Malone, Bringing To Bear All Her Experiences With Defectors, Guiding Us Through The Mixed Messages

"Diana West is distinguished from almost all political commentators because she seeks less to defend ideas and proposals than to investigate and understand what happens and what has happened. This gives her modest and unpretentious books and articles the status of true scientific inquiry, shifting the debate from the field of liking and disliking to being and non-being."

-- Olavo de Carvalho


I am on record (here) as being agnostic/openminded in the schism(s) around Robert Malone and who we all think he really is.

I shifted toward a position that was mostly (well earned) exhaustion, [34 years, trapped in the Virus/Sorcery story, rarely permitted to think of much else] …in which I argued from a middle ground of wait and see, I sort of still think he did more harm than good and for heaven’s sake, 50 million people heard that Rogan interview and he is clear about damage and death by way of “the vaccines” so who cares if he is confused about isolation, and…the entire bedrock of the Covid Vaccinology Religion. (Vaccines Save Lives—etc.)

Like the couple at the end of the Harry Martinson poem stuck inside a gray mountain on which snow falls heavily: I just wanted out.

Malone, McCullough, James Bond or the Green-tongued Rotbeest —I was ready to accept any hole blown in the wall, by anybody, any which way, through which we could exit. I didn’t really care who Robert Malone was. Or who Peter McCullough was. Rather, I thought I knew, more or less: Mainstream insiders, blowing certain whistles, not others.

I only concerned myself with that they help break down the primary spell’s first (thick) casing, namely:

“Fauci is good. Fauci is right. Fauci is fighting for our lives,” and bring people to, at the very least:

“Something is rotten in the Kingdom of Denmark.”

Both of them struck me as good men who were simply deeply steeped in, and unable to think outside of, Virus Algorithms.

I’m actually, though this may anger some, still not taking a side, but I am here to say that Diana West has written a piece that sets a new high bar for the whole discussion.

Consider Malone's personal coronavirus creation story, the one he likes to tell all the interviewers. Before there was a fake pandemic, before there was a fake PCR test, before there was even a  computer virus, Malone says he got a call from a "CIA agent in Wuhan," Michael Callahan, a big name in government bioweapons research and pandemic planning. The way the story goes, another CIA agent, Daryl Galloway, introduced Malone and Callahan a decade earlier. That second CIA agent, we are told, is Malone's sometime-business partner. Anyway, CIA-guy-Callahan (not Galloway) called up Malone from Wuhan on January 4, 2020 (he often like to mention the date) to tell Malone to get his team "spun up" to look at a new virus.

As Malone tells it, including to Stew Peters in October 2021, he and his team went on to perform a "risk analysis" -- that's his business, he says, that's what he did with Zika and many other outbreaks. Malone's conclusion? A new vaccine could not be developed quickly and safely enough to keep pace with the Thing from Wuhan. The US government -- NIAID's Fauci, HHS, FDA's Woodcock -- determined otherwise, he told Stew, and the rest, we might say, is "Operation Warp Speed" history.

Did Robert Malone, Mr. mRNA himself, come out and warn the American public against the hasty, unsafe coronavirus mRNA "vaccine"? No. I guess he abandoned his own risk assessment, because he also says he says he got "jabbed" himself early on and "almost died" of his second Moderna shot.

Did he warn the public about that? No.

I would like to know why not.

Amazing piece of writing.

Read it here.

My main reason for avoiding this subject was that I didn’t want get too demoralized. But Diana West got me thinking about the importance of clarity.

I came to recall How Peter Duesberg, and other HIV “deniers,” (yesterday’s anti-vaxxers) spoke, when addressing the “only drug that could save people’s lives” in the AIDS war of the late 80s, namely AZT. (It killed some 300,000, in the end.)

The news that AZT will soon be prescribed to asymptomatic people has left many leading AIDS doctors dumbfounded and furious. Every doctor and scientist I asked felt that it was highly unprofessional and reckless to announce a study with no data to look at, making recommendations with such drastic public health implications. "This simply does not happen," says Bialy. "The government is reporting scientific facts before they've been reviewed? It's unheard of."

"It's beyond belief," says Dr. Sonnabend in a voice tinged with desperation. "I don't know what to do. I have to go in and face an office full of patients asking for AZT. I'm terrified. I don't know what to do as a responsible physician. The first study was ridiculous. Margaret Fishl, who has done both of these studies, obviously doesn't know the first thing about clinical trials. I don't trust her. Or the others. They're simply not good enough. We're being held hostage by second-rate scientists. We let them get away with the first disaster; now they're doing it again."

"It's a momentous decision to say to people, 'if you're HIV-positive and your T4-cells are below 500 start taking AZT,'" says the doctor who wished to remain anonymous. "I know dozens of people that I've seen personally every few months for several years now who have been in that state for more than five years, and have not progressed to any disease."

"I'm ashamed of my colleagues," Sonnabend laments. "I'm embarrassed. This is such shoddy science it's hard to believe nobody is protesting. Damned cowards. The name of the game is protect your grants, don't open your mouth. It's all about money... it's grounds for just following the party line and not being critical, when there are obviously financial and political forces that are driving this."

When Duesberg heard the latest announcement, he was particularly stunned over the reaction of Gay Men's Health Crisis President Richard Dunne, who said that GMHC now urged "everybody to get tested," and of course those who test positive to go on AZT. "These people are running into the gas chambers," says Duesberg. "Himmler would have been so happy if only the Jews were this cooperative."

Source