Edward Dowd: "If True It Boggles The Mind: An 84% INCREASE In Deaths AfterCovid Shots, 61,000 excess deaths; This is what we call democide--death by government
Edward Dowd: "If True It Boggles The Mind: An 84% INCREASE In Deaths AfterCovid Shots, 61,000 excess deaths; This is what we call democide--death by government
I just wrote him (just now) to look out for your eMail. Sometimes because it's a public address, it take a minute, but he'll see it. I also eMailed his wife and son so they monitor as well. I know he'd love to talk with you on an array of topics, so recurring engagements would be great. He'd also plug your work. Like you, he's such as nice Christian person, too. Stay tuned as soon as write you him and I'll keep on top of it, too. 🤗
Definitely! 🤗 Also, I recommend David's daily show. I haven't missed it in years. It's the best thing in news, analysis and events forecasting. Visit: TheDavidKnightShow.Com to see where he uploads to. Tomorrow, he'll be live on Rokfin for two hours (and that's beside M-F, each at 3-hours). ☺️
I thank him for giving David Knight a platform. What an excellent researcher and analyst David is. I'm glad he's on his own now. They weren't compatible. David Knight is very pure and doesn't prevaricate. His principles are Christ and Liberty.
I agree with you 100%. I've been a caller on Alex's show a few times, and also when Burmas did the Sunday show. I actually sent Alex a Facebook message telling him that he should stick to documentaries (which he excels at, he is a terrible radio host and especially an interviewer) and that he should get David to front the whole thing (or at least have his own show).
Alex is awesome, but he's like a vortex that creates and destroys in equal measure. He's lost so many amazing people because he is a walking Peter Principle, unfortunately.
Still, he has done amazing work and I thank him a lot for what he has done.
Separately, parhaps read this Y2020 clip from The David Knight Show (where an article by Farber was excerpted by Knight -... there used to be a video there where Knight read her article, but it was removed). Celia is aware of that coverage because I brought it to her attention several months ago.
Pfizer's own studies after starting these putrid injections showed over 1,200 deaths. The only possible conclusion is that spread out over 100's of millions of injectees, over 2, 3, or 4 injections, over many, many months that there will be hundreds of thousands of deaths.
Still, big pharma will never admit to causing even 1 death. They are now murdering 1 million people a year with faulty drugs, opioids, drug errors and mistakes and now poison mRNA injections. The easy way out for cowardly big pharma and cowardly Congress...blame it all on Putin and Russia. See, the entire fake pandemic now has been solved! All the other thousands of scumbags causing great harm to the world are now vindicated.
And yet my Senator, Angus King (Maine) insists that COVID vaxxes (ALL vaxxes!) are safe and effective, & wants Congress to fund states' ability to have their own vax mandates.
Pure Evil: Pfizer and the New World Order Depopulation Agenda: Anti-Sperm Antibody Is One of the "Adverse Events of Special Interest" Found in the Secret Pfizer Document
“The earth has cancer and the cancer is man” - Club of Rome, Mankind at the Turning Point
I'm glad someone else is making a Vietnam comparison. It is apt in myriad ways.
Because my head has long been in the Vietnam era, writing a novel, bit.ly/CWS-e, I tried to make the link last year based on the *rate* of VAERS deaths. In addition to having a much much much bigger platform, Dowd's approach is more compelling. The rate is not even close. This death-shot democide is *at least* an order of magnitude greater than Vietnam and it is far from finished.
It's easy to look back on the Vietnam era and think, "what were they thinking?" but Dowd's comparison highlights a permanent feature of fallen human nature: gullibility; thinking that most folks, most of the time are mostly good, and mostly telling the truth. Even gullibility about ourselves that we are seeing it clearly and acting righteously most of the time.
For much of the '60s, most men (and their social circles) basically went along with the draft, unaware of the pointless horrors that conflict would turn out to entail--good fighting men with superior weaponry fatally hamstrung by crazy rules that guaranteed victory for the godless Communists. The protest stuff is what now gets featured, of course--retrospectively righteous, more or less, a halcyon time for the culture--but it was terribly slow to gather steam, and for long time, pretty fractious and bumbling.
Which is what Matthias Desmet has observed about opposition movements to mass formation.
We can take a lesson from the Vietnam era by simply remembering a Biblical truth: folks lie and so therefore, so do our governments, and our corporations, and our NGOs, and our leaders--routinely, even the ones we kinda like. We should be most surprised that the God who unashamedly calls Himself "Truth" (John 14:6) came to save *any* of us from this self-made stew-pot of deception and death.
John H, you seem nice enough and I appreciate that you’re a Christian. But to throw out a number like “12+ million” without citing proper sources is incredibly irresponsible and is Holocaust hysteria of the worst kind. So first I have to ask: what is your source(s) for this “over 12 million” claim? Is that from Simon Weisenthal (who actually claimed 11 million)? Did you know that no one takes that seriously and for good reason? Even Deborah Lipstadt rejected that number.
Next, let’s address what in academia we’d politely call “problems in reasoning.” You say “Seventy-seven years after WWII the actual number of people murdered in the Nazi death camps is still unknown. What is known is that the number was over twelve million…“ Do you see the problem with your statements there? They contradict one another. You say the actual number is unknown and then immediately say…it IS known. It’s like saying nobody but everybody knows.
If you could provide your source(s) for the claim, I will be more than happy to examine it/them, how they arrived at that number, and their explanation of how it was technically possible for the camp facilities to kill millions (6-12) via “gas chambers” and do it so efficiently, especially when considering the camps’ limited resources and capacities for such immense killing operations and their lack of both time (2.5 years) and motive (where killing laborers necessary for the war effort would defeat the entire purpose).
Note that scholars have for decades exposed the myth of 6 million, where even the Auschwitz museum itself has admitted that their original claim of 4 million had to be reduced to the now claimed 1.5 million: https://apnews.com/article/4de24d2430cd2e900602ecf14b1db341. Incidentally, there are 46 volumes of death books at Auschwitz and they document each death via a death certificate containing the full name, profession, religion, date and place of birth, pre-Auschwitz residence, parent names, time and cause of death (as determined by a camp physician). What do those books claim as the total number of deaths at Auschwitz?: 69,000, of whom about 30,000 were Jews. As a side note, those books indicate that more Christians than Jews actually died at Auschwitz.
Still, their on-display public plaque gives the figure of 1.5 million. Not sure how they reconcile the total number derived from the death books with that more prominent number.
So even as the Auschwitz museum itself has reduced the original total by at least 2.5 million, you’ve managed somehow to INCREASE the originally (but now essentially refuted) claim of 6 million by another 6 million. Again, I kindly request that you cite your source(s) for this claim so I can verify it for myself and others.
Also, don’t you find it rather suspicious, as I do, that there have been tens of thousands of Holocaust “survivors” who’ve received billions of dollars in reparation payments over the many decades and how there’s usually a new crop of “survivors” who suddenly appear requesting payment? The illogic of “surviving” a holocaust never seems to dawn on people. Note that are 165,800 “survivors” currently residing in Israel, with 15,324 having died last year. Those survivors received $1.29 billion in stipends and grants in 2021 alone (https://www.jns.org/over-15000-holocaust-survivors-passed-away-last-year/). That's a lot of money for a lot of "survivors" of "death camps."
Although I could go on and cite numerous sources that disprove the lies, I’ll stop here since this really isn’t the place for this discussion. But I do need to add the following.
Since I agree with your initial statement that the number of people “murdered” ultimately remains “unknown,” in attempting to identify an approximate number, we can then only go on probabilities based on evidence provided over the last 70+ years by the many people who have closely examined that evidence. The best we can say about how many actually died in the labor camps would be via two primary sources: 1) the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) in their initial 1,600-page report from 1948 and follow-up reports, specifically their 1993 “Letter of the Tracing Center of the ICRC” in which they provide a precise total of 296,077 deaths; and 2) the many revisionist historians who have labored for decades in examining the forensic and demographic data and thousands of documents. These researchers have independently arrived at different numbers (naturally), but these numbers are much lower than the original claims of 6 million. Specifically, they are as low as 125,000 (Robert Faurisson, 2006) and 140,000 (Jean-Claude Pressac, 1994) to as high as 1.6 million (Jewish historian Yehuda Bauer, 1982).
If you need some good resources on this question, feel free to ask.
Email David Knight (DavidKnightShow@protonmail.com). Go on his show. He'd love to have you. I spoke with him. Tell him @NYCeyes sent you. He'll now. 🤗
I will. What an honor!
I just wrote him (just now) to look out for your eMail. Sometimes because it's a public address, it take a minute, but he'll see it. I also eMailed his wife and son so they monitor as well. I know he'd love to talk with you on an array of topics, so recurring engagements would be great. He'd also plug your work. Like you, he's such as nice Christian person, too. Stay tuned as soon as write you him and I'll keep on top of it, too. 🤗
Celia that would be INCREDIBLE! My trucker friends watch him, they would be over the moon!!!!
Please be sure to let us know here when you are on the show, Celia. Looking forward to it.
Definitely! 🤗 Also, I recommend David's daily show. I haven't missed it in years. It's the best thing in news, analysis and events forecasting. Visit: TheDavidKnightShow.Com to see where he uploads to. Tomorrow, he'll be live on Rokfin for two hours (and that's beside M-F, each at 3-hours). ☺️
I looked him up, and I have seen episodes of his show. Thanks!
Bear in mind, Davids got a real hang up about Trump, which gets a bit wearing after a while.
I'm fine with that. I'm from old school New York City, and I know what he's all about. David is correct.
Ironically, I thank Alex Jones for introducing me to the concept of democide about ten years ago.
I thank him for giving David Knight a platform. What an excellent researcher and analyst David is. I'm glad he's on his own now. They weren't compatible. David Knight is very pure and doesn't prevaricate. His principles are Christ and Liberty.
I agree with you 100%. I've been a caller on Alex's show a few times, and also when Burmas did the Sunday show. I actually sent Alex a Facebook message telling him that he should stick to documentaries (which he excels at, he is a terrible radio host and especially an interviewer) and that he should get David to front the whole thing (or at least have his own show).
Alex is awesome, but he's like a vortex that creates and destroys in equal measure. He's lost so many amazing people because he is a walking Peter Principle, unfortunately.
Still, he has done amazing work and I thank him a lot for what he has done.
Not onboard with your harpooning of Alex Jones. He is fighting tremendously and needs encouragement not smears. Peter Principle? Hardly
She repeats an interview on a show and now people want her to go on their show , what's up with that?
What's the issue exactly?
Separately, parhaps read this Y2020 clip from The David Knight Show (where an article by Farber was excerpted by Knight -... there used to be a video there where Knight read her article, but it was removed). Celia is aware of that coverage because I brought it to her attention several months ago.
https://roundtablereport.com/?p=6582
Pfizer's own studies after starting these putrid injections showed over 1,200 deaths. The only possible conclusion is that spread out over 100's of millions of injectees, over 2, 3, or 4 injections, over many, many months that there will be hundreds of thousands of deaths.
Still, big pharma will never admit to causing even 1 death. They are now murdering 1 million people a year with faulty drugs, opioids, drug errors and mistakes and now poison mRNA injections. The easy way out for cowardly big pharma and cowardly Congress...blame it all on Putin and Russia. See, the entire fake pandemic now has been solved! All the other thousands of scumbags causing great harm to the world are now vindicated.
Truth.
And yet my Senator, Angus King (Maine) insists that COVID vaxxes (ALL vaxxes!) are safe and effective, & wants Congress to fund states' ability to have their own vax mandates.
I'm wondering how much of his re-election campaign funding comes from Big Pharma & related interests....
Pure Evil: Pfizer and the New World Order Depopulation Agenda: Anti-Sperm Antibody Is One of the "Adverse Events of Special Interest" Found in the Secret Pfizer Document
“The earth has cancer and the cancer is man” - Club of Rome, Mankind at the Turning Point
https://lionessofjudah.substack.com/p/pfizer-and-the-new-world-order-depopulation
I'm glad someone else is making a Vietnam comparison. It is apt in myriad ways.
Because my head has long been in the Vietnam era, writing a novel, bit.ly/CWS-e, I tried to make the link last year based on the *rate* of VAERS deaths. In addition to having a much much much bigger platform, Dowd's approach is more compelling. The rate is not even close. This death-shot democide is *at least* an order of magnitude greater than Vietnam and it is far from finished.
It's easy to look back on the Vietnam era and think, "what were they thinking?" but Dowd's comparison highlights a permanent feature of fallen human nature: gullibility; thinking that most folks, most of the time are mostly good, and mostly telling the truth. Even gullibility about ourselves that we are seeing it clearly and acting righteously most of the time.
For much of the '60s, most men (and their social circles) basically went along with the draft, unaware of the pointless horrors that conflict would turn out to entail--good fighting men with superior weaponry fatally hamstrung by crazy rules that guaranteed victory for the godless Communists. The protest stuff is what now gets featured, of course--retrospectively righteous, more or less, a halcyon time for the culture--but it was terribly slow to gather steam, and for long time, pretty fractious and bumbling.
Which is what Matthias Desmet has observed about opposition movements to mass formation.
We can take a lesson from the Vietnam era by simply remembering a Biblical truth: folks lie and so therefore, so do our governments, and our corporations, and our NGOs, and our leaders--routinely, even the ones we kinda like. We should be most surprised that the God who unashamedly calls Himself "Truth" (John 14:6) came to save *any* of us from this self-made stew-pot of deception and death.
not sure why this is relevant but I like it.
John H, you seem nice enough and I appreciate that you’re a Christian. But to throw out a number like “12+ million” without citing proper sources is incredibly irresponsible and is Holocaust hysteria of the worst kind. So first I have to ask: what is your source(s) for this “over 12 million” claim? Is that from Simon Weisenthal (who actually claimed 11 million)? Did you know that no one takes that seriously and for good reason? Even Deborah Lipstadt rejected that number.
Next, let’s address what in academia we’d politely call “problems in reasoning.” You say “Seventy-seven years after WWII the actual number of people murdered in the Nazi death camps is still unknown. What is known is that the number was over twelve million…“ Do you see the problem with your statements there? They contradict one another. You say the actual number is unknown and then immediately say…it IS known. It’s like saying nobody but everybody knows.
If you could provide your source(s) for the claim, I will be more than happy to examine it/them, how they arrived at that number, and their explanation of how it was technically possible for the camp facilities to kill millions (6-12) via “gas chambers” and do it so efficiently, especially when considering the camps’ limited resources and capacities for such immense killing operations and their lack of both time (2.5 years) and motive (where killing laborers necessary for the war effort would defeat the entire purpose).
Note that scholars have for decades exposed the myth of 6 million, where even the Auschwitz museum itself has admitted that their original claim of 4 million had to be reduced to the now claimed 1.5 million: https://apnews.com/article/4de24d2430cd2e900602ecf14b1db341. Incidentally, there are 46 volumes of death books at Auschwitz and they document each death via a death certificate containing the full name, profession, religion, date and place of birth, pre-Auschwitz residence, parent names, time and cause of death (as determined by a camp physician). What do those books claim as the total number of deaths at Auschwitz?: 69,000, of whom about 30,000 were Jews. As a side note, those books indicate that more Christians than Jews actually died at Auschwitz.
Still, their on-display public plaque gives the figure of 1.5 million. Not sure how they reconcile the total number derived from the death books with that more prominent number.
So even as the Auschwitz museum itself has reduced the original total by at least 2.5 million, you’ve managed somehow to INCREASE the originally (but now essentially refuted) claim of 6 million by another 6 million. Again, I kindly request that you cite your source(s) for this claim so I can verify it for myself and others.
Also, don’t you find it rather suspicious, as I do, that there have been tens of thousands of Holocaust “survivors” who’ve received billions of dollars in reparation payments over the many decades and how there’s usually a new crop of “survivors” who suddenly appear requesting payment? The illogic of “surviving” a holocaust never seems to dawn on people. Note that are 165,800 “survivors” currently residing in Israel, with 15,324 having died last year. Those survivors received $1.29 billion in stipends and grants in 2021 alone (https://www.jns.org/over-15000-holocaust-survivors-passed-away-last-year/). That's a lot of money for a lot of "survivors" of "death camps."
Although I could go on and cite numerous sources that disprove the lies, I’ll stop here since this really isn’t the place for this discussion. But I do need to add the following.
Since I agree with your initial statement that the number of people “murdered” ultimately remains “unknown,” in attempting to identify an approximate number, we can then only go on probabilities based on evidence provided over the last 70+ years by the many people who have closely examined that evidence. The best we can say about how many actually died in the labor camps would be via two primary sources: 1) the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) in their initial 1,600-page report from 1948 and follow-up reports, specifically their 1993 “Letter of the Tracing Center of the ICRC” in which they provide a precise total of 296,077 deaths; and 2) the many revisionist historians who have labored for decades in examining the forensic and demographic data and thousands of documents. These researchers have independently arrived at different numbers (naturally), but these numbers are much lower than the original claims of 6 million. Specifically, they are as low as 125,000 (Robert Faurisson, 2006) and 140,000 (Jean-Claude Pressac, 1994) to as high as 1.6 million (Jewish historian Yehuda Bauer, 1982).
If you need some good resources on this question, feel free to ask.