The policies were good. You should bring them back. We were inspired to challenge them, and that is a good thing. I did not want to distort them, but I got engaged in a conversation with myself wondering whether a person could be ethical without believing in one God. I adore my family, and they have made me ethical, I believe. Like a good teacher, you make your readers think. The previous substack of yours made me think about fiat currency all day. I am glad I was able to read all those different views, even though people argued a lot.
Is it good to believe in one God if there isn't one? Is it good to believe (in) ANYTHING that isn't true (real)?
I am good to others because I put myself in their position (in my imagination) and recognize that they would want me to be good to them, which includes not being hostile to me, even when I'm a nuisance (or worse) to them. I recognize how dependent we humans are on each other and that, if I'm not good to others, they have good reason not to trust me, which forces them, for their own protection, to be less good to me than I would like. If I'm not good to others, it deprives me of the community inclusion and respect that I crave. I want friends, not enemies; I want peace, not antagonism and fear.
To be good to MYSELF I need allies, and only allies, not opponents, and that means I need to be an ally to everyone, even if they oppose me. Opponents' OPPOSITION needs to be opposed, but, again putting myself in their position, the restraint put on them should be designed to quell their opposition with as little misery for them as possible.
I cannot and do not want to make anyone believe in the one true God. To believe in the one true God, that is to love him, one needs to know him and when your love grows for him you will want to obey : Matthew 22 : 37 - 40 . That will make real good.
Well it's your house so your rules, though it's a slippery slope involving free speech. Each conversation has to be reviewed from in total sometimes to consider the context and how it evolved, as I've seen some where a person claiming to be attacked initiated the verbal assault and could be considered to inviting the resulting confrontation.
Open discussions about any subject should be welcome, if they're kept to considerate dialogue, so good luck with those determinations as some conversations veer far from the content of the articles direction.
I DO think communism is a wonderful idea, as long as it is 100% VOLUNTARY! Which, of course, it never is. Demicrazy (ie demi means half) is only more mild form of communism, which is falling apart, as my so-called democratic nation of Canada trashes and jails, truckers, pastors, fathers who want to save their kids from jabs, etc.... Demoncrazy is perhaps a better mocking of the word democracy. The hidden communists have shown their ugly heads in ALL governments. Humanity needs to be free from all tyranny, which all governments are to various degrees. I will decide ALL things for myself. If a NO is not respected, then the answer is always NO to everything, until that is accepted. I say NO to all human governments....I work with many freedom groups who think likewise and we build our own systems in cooperation and agreement. Screw big government, big media, big pharma, big tech, big corporations in general....I support none of it anymore.
If Keith McNally can ban people from his restaurants for being rude to waitresses, I can ban people for being rude to my readers, right? I'm protecting something I care about. Nobody will ever find me censoring civilized speech I disagree with. I won't let it become a slippery slope. I'm just anti-bullying, having been viciously bullied myself. I hate bullies.
I used to believe the Holocaust story, but after over 20 years of researching any material that was available, and noticing the many constantly repeated "facts" that had no evidence to support them, I gradually came to understand that it was greatly misrepresented. It is clear to anyone who does this research that the story has been exposed to be made up of many lies that have been quietly disregarded but the story continues on as before. And the effort to extend the story with evermore museums and college courses etc, and the laws to prosecute those who oppose the story should reveal the truth of what is really going on. And there are many powerful people who are not jewish granted, but these people are often simply puppets managed by hidden masters above them. There is a fine line between banning conversations because they are "racist" and those that are against the authoritarian chosen story.
Thank you for everything you do and you are. Words are not enough to express my gratitude. Your/our success is well deserved.
And btw, I always wanted to let you know that unknowingly you taught me to stop being admirative, to question the impact on the receiver and the spiritual dangers for the giver.
... and then I also realize that everything meaningful I have learned has been through people I have felt enthusiasm for.. especially two men and one woman who were transmitters of humanity (human values&principles, discernment)... so it can't be that bad.. a bit childish maybe? But I'm 62 and it is still what lightens me up... But it puts the person who is admired in the driving seat, it converts him/her in leader with respect to his/her skills, it puts him/her in the front when he/she has not necessarily formaly accepted that responsability...
Celia, it's difficult to verbalize so bear with me in this intent. A year ago and more I meant to show my gratitude towards you (and admiration) by explaining to you what I saw in you in terms of skills. I may not have specified then that to me skills are the God given path towards meaningful integration with our fellow men(women etc etc), and there is no reason - to me- to feel either proud or ashamed of them being named. I may also have been overbearing in my enthusiasm. Somehow based on your response and other posts, I received (wrongly maybe) the info that the naming with admiration what I saw as your skills had incommodated you. I felt a bit sad. Then I questionned my tendency to admire. I saw how it got me trapped a good number if times in abusive personal/professional relationships. Appreciation, Admiration produces a temporary state of vulnerability, unanchoring, uprootedness. While in awe time stops. And there is a breach in our association to ourselves which can be used by abusers (which you're clearly not). Aren't we as christians also only supposed to be in awe towards God? It left me with the idea that I had to restrain my enthusiasm for people - not only the expression of it to protect the receiver but internally to protect myself. On the other hand I keep wondering. Is enthusiasm really that bad?
Hatred and bigotry have no place anywhere anytime and of course this includes slurs toward Jews, Muslims, or any group whether ethnic, religious or racial. But I see the need to call out criminals who hide behind it in order to get away with whatever atrocities they are committing. I’m looking specifically at the Jesuits and the Zionists. I grew up in a Jewish family that like most others was dedicated to the state of Israel and we thought this was the right thing to do because 1) we are God’s chosen people and 2) we been persecuted, scorned and hated every place we ended up. I’ve learned so much since then and am so turned off to what the leaders of the Zionist movement have done. The latest step that really got my blood boiling was when the Israeli government cut a deal with Pfizer to use their people as forced lab rats for their poisonous mRNA injections. The most sickening thing I’ve seen is the way they’ve responded to those opposed to this calling them anti semitic as well as anti vaxxers.
I recently commented on your Romans 14 article with some information about John Gill and his Exposition of the Bible. I appreciated your acknowledgment of that Comment.
I thoroughly enjoy your style, by the way.
I agree with your point that not everything is a Jew thing. In fact, it has long been a practice of those in power to place Jews in leadership roles of institutions they plan on using for destruction or failure just to blame the Jews.
However, the men cited as being Atheists, are not Atheists at all. Some may not like the reality but the refusal to accept reality for things we don’t like is partly responsible for the mess we are in presently.
— Anthony Fauci is Roman Catholic.
— Bill Gates is a Satanist.
— Barack Obama is a Muslim.
— Klaus Schwab is a Roman Catholic:
— Anthony Fauci is Roman Catholic:
He was raised Roman Catholic. Attended a private Jesuit high school. He graduated from Jesuit founded College of the Holy Cross. He has never renounced. When the Anthony S. Fauci Integrated Science Complex was dedicated in 2022, Fauci wore his Holy Cross lab coat. The Catholic Church and plenty of priests claim him and brag on him for his “Jesuit ideals” and other such nonsense.
— Bill Gates is a Satanist:
Until recently Gates didn’t even hide it.
Gates and Microsoft openly sponsored Marina Abramović for years. It took an outcry for them to remove her from their websites. Years of whitewashing it to make it look like she’s not an open Satanist has not been successful because there is a plethora of evidence to the contrary. Including parties she threw for Gates that included fake blood on live naked models acting out ritual cannibalism with satanic writing on the walls.
Microsoft even used to have a highlights video on their website of one of these parties with Bill and Marim featured heavily.
— Barack Obama is Muslim:
Just one of dozens of pieces of evidence to this fact is Obama has been wearing a ring for at least 40 years that is adorned with the first part of the Islamic declaration of faith, the Shahada: “There is no god except Allah.” The Shahada is the first of the Five Pillars of Islam, expressing the two fundamental beliefs that make a person a Muslim: There is no god but Allah, and Muhammad is Allah's prophet.
Sincere recitation of the Shahada is the sole requirement for becoming a Muslim, as it expresses a person’s rejection of all other gods.
— Klaus Schwab is a Roman Catholic:
He was raised Catholic, has never renounced, has not publicly stated he is anti-Catholic nor, to my knowledge, has he ever been anything other than “accused” of be atheist. Meaning, there has been plenty of name calling but no evidence. Most Catholics don’t want to claim him because of what he’s doing. But that doesn’t change the facts.
Most of the high ranking Nazis were staunch Roman Catholics also but mankind keeps rewriting history or grabbing low hanging fruit to skip what makes them uncomfortable.
Re whether to ban people who “peddle madness”, I think it's a question of the manner in which it is done. If it is tentatively and humbly—without triumphalism or pontification—posited as a possibility along with some substantiation, then I would more than tolerate it, especially if openness to possibility of error is also admitted or implied.
Yes I agree. But I have a lot of experience with government plants, harassers, demoralizers, trolls, etc. So I have to be strict. I love eclectic theories and rarely dismiss anything. But denial of communist atrocities triggers me bad.
The text about my new banning policies is now banned. I banned my own text. It was attracting distortion.
That's too funny, Celia! Congrats on breaking the top 50!
The policies were good. You should bring them back. We were inspired to challenge them, and that is a good thing. I did not want to distort them, but I got engaged in a conversation with myself wondering whether a person could be ethical without believing in one God. I adore my family, and they have made me ethical, I believe. Like a good teacher, you make your readers think. The previous substack of yours made me think about fiat currency all day. I am glad I was able to read all those different views, even though people argued a lot.
Historically, the polytheistic Romans were deeply concerned about ethics. Just sayin'.
Is it good to believe in one God if there isn't one? Is it good to believe (in) ANYTHING that isn't true (real)?
I am good to others because I put myself in their position (in my imagination) and recognize that they would want me to be good to them, which includes not being hostile to me, even when I'm a nuisance (or worse) to them. I recognize how dependent we humans are on each other and that, if I'm not good to others, they have good reason not to trust me, which forces them, for their own protection, to be less good to me than I would like. If I'm not good to others, it deprives me of the community inclusion and respect that I crave. I want friends, not enemies; I want peace, not antagonism and fear.
To be good to MYSELF I need allies, and only allies, not opponents, and that means I need to be an ally to everyone, even if they oppose me. Opponents' OPPOSITION needs to be opposed, but, again putting myself in their position, the restraint put on them should be designed to quell their opposition with as little misery for them as possible.
I cannot and do not want to make anyone believe in the one true God. To believe in the one true God, that is to love him, one needs to know him and when your love grows for him you will want to obey : Matthew 22 : 37 - 40 . That will make real good.
Here's the ranking link (good job Celia!):
https://substack.com/leaderboard/culture/all
It would be great if you could write about some of this topics (no need to mention me, it's just for the cause):
J6 What THEY don't want YOU to know:
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/j6-what-you-need-to-know
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/democracy-democrazy
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/reinventing-democracy
How to turn the AI into a COVIDIOT:
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/how-to-turn-ai-into-a-covidiot
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/amnesty-or-justice
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/not-vaccine-not-gene-therapy-just
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/the-real-covid-timeline
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/the-threat-of-the-international-plandemic
Nothing is what it seems:
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/electro-quakes
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/balloon-attack
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/satattack
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/toxic-spraying
What do bioweapons have to do with the Department of Energy?
Anybody answering these questions PLEASE ? !!!
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/what-do-bioweapons-have-to-do-with
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/the-2020-american-coup
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/water-poisoning-they-drink-perrier
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/will-tedros-ever-go-to-jail
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/best-scientific-sources-to-debunk
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/killing-me-softly-with-green-songs
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/carbon-reparations
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/climate-deaths
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/covid-treatments
Read it before you banned it now what😂😂😂😂😂?
Well it's your house so your rules, though it's a slippery slope involving free speech. Each conversation has to be reviewed from in total sometimes to consider the context and how it evolved, as I've seen some where a person claiming to be attacked initiated the verbal assault and could be considered to inviting the resulting confrontation.
Open discussions about any subject should be welcome, if they're kept to considerate dialogue, so good luck with those determinations as some conversations veer far from the content of the articles direction.
Congratulations!
Congratulations Celia. And thank you for inviting us into your living room.
Thank you for being here, Peter and Ginger!
🥳👏🏻🥳
I DO think communism is a wonderful idea, as long as it is 100% VOLUNTARY! Which, of course, it never is. Demicrazy (ie demi means half) is only more mild form of communism, which is falling apart, as my so-called democratic nation of Canada trashes and jails, truckers, pastors, fathers who want to save their kids from jabs, etc.... Demoncrazy is perhaps a better mocking of the word democracy. The hidden communists have shown their ugly heads in ALL governments. Humanity needs to be free from all tyranny, which all governments are to various degrees. I will decide ALL things for myself. If a NO is not respected, then the answer is always NO to everything, until that is accepted. I say NO to all human governments....I work with many freedom groups who think likewise and we build our own systems in cooperation and agreement. Screw big government, big media, big pharma, big tech, big corporations in general....I support none of it anymore.
Top 50. Congratulations. Keep up the good work. I'm excited to get your book.
Blessings to you.
Cancelling voices is the slippery slope imo.
Keep bringing great content and you'll attract mostly great people ;)
If Keith McNally can ban people from his restaurants for being rude to waitresses, I can ban people for being rude to my readers, right? I'm protecting something I care about. Nobody will ever find me censoring civilized speech I disagree with. I won't let it become a slippery slope. I'm just anti-bullying, having been viciously bullied myself. I hate bullies.
Agreed.
Your substack, your rules.
I understand
Yes, ma'am! We want to elevate in our conversations not fall to the lowest common denominators. And congrats on being in the top Substack 50!
I used to believe the Holocaust story, but after over 20 years of researching any material that was available, and noticing the many constantly repeated "facts" that had no evidence to support them, I gradually came to understand that it was greatly misrepresented. It is clear to anyone who does this research that the story has been exposed to be made up of many lies that have been quietly disregarded but the story continues on as before. And the effort to extend the story with evermore museums and college courses etc, and the laws to prosecute those who oppose the story should reveal the truth of what is really going on. And there are many powerful people who are not jewish granted, but these people are often simply puppets managed by hidden masters above them. There is a fine line between banning conversations because they are "racist" and those that are against the authoritarian chosen story.
You are so sweet you even include your readers with your “we” broke the top 50. Congratulations Celia you are amazing as you know we all love you.
Congrats and well deserved Celia!
Yay! We be culture!
49 is lucky: 7 × 7
Congratulations!
Thank you for everything you do and you are. Words are not enough to express my gratitude. Your/our success is well deserved.
And btw, I always wanted to let you know that unknowingly you taught me to stop being admirative, to question the impact on the receiver and the spiritual dangers for the giver.
Thank you Rachel. I was not aware I said this. Can you tell me more?
... and then I also realize that everything meaningful I have learned has been through people I have felt enthusiasm for.. especially two men and one woman who were transmitters of humanity (human values&principles, discernment)... so it can't be that bad.. a bit childish maybe? But I'm 62 and it is still what lightens me up... But it puts the person who is admired in the driving seat, it converts him/her in leader with respect to his/her skills, it puts him/her in the front when he/she has not necessarily formaly accepted that responsability...
Celia, it's difficult to verbalize so bear with me in this intent. A year ago and more I meant to show my gratitude towards you (and admiration) by explaining to you what I saw in you in terms of skills. I may not have specified then that to me skills are the God given path towards meaningful integration with our fellow men(women etc etc), and there is no reason - to me- to feel either proud or ashamed of them being named. I may also have been overbearing in my enthusiasm. Somehow based on your response and other posts, I received (wrongly maybe) the info that the naming with admiration what I saw as your skills had incommodated you. I felt a bit sad. Then I questionned my tendency to admire. I saw how it got me trapped a good number if times in abusive personal/professional relationships. Appreciation, Admiration produces a temporary state of vulnerability, unanchoring, uprootedness. While in awe time stops. And there is a breach in our association to ourselves which can be used by abusers (which you're clearly not). Aren't we as christians also only supposed to be in awe towards God? It left me with the idea that I had to restrain my enthusiasm for people - not only the expression of it to protect the receiver but internally to protect myself. On the other hand I keep wondering. Is enthusiasm really that bad?
If journalism is good, it is controversial by its nature. Julian Assange
Hatred and bigotry have no place anywhere anytime and of course this includes slurs toward Jews, Muslims, or any group whether ethnic, religious or racial. But I see the need to call out criminals who hide behind it in order to get away with whatever atrocities they are committing. I’m looking specifically at the Jesuits and the Zionists. I grew up in a Jewish family that like most others was dedicated to the state of Israel and we thought this was the right thing to do because 1) we are God’s chosen people and 2) we been persecuted, scorned and hated every place we ended up. I’ve learned so much since then and am so turned off to what the leaders of the Zionist movement have done. The latest step that really got my blood boiling was when the Israeli government cut a deal with Pfizer to use their people as forced lab rats for their poisonous mRNA injections. The most sickening thing I’ve seen is the way they’ve responded to those opposed to this calling them anti semitic as well as anti vaxxers.
Celia,
I recently commented on your Romans 14 article with some information about John Gill and his Exposition of the Bible. I appreciated your acknowledgment of that Comment.
I thoroughly enjoy your style, by the way.
I agree with your point that not everything is a Jew thing. In fact, it has long been a practice of those in power to place Jews in leadership roles of institutions they plan on using for destruction or failure just to blame the Jews.
However, the men cited as being Atheists, are not Atheists at all. Some may not like the reality but the refusal to accept reality for things we don’t like is partly responsible for the mess we are in presently.
— Anthony Fauci is Roman Catholic.
— Bill Gates is a Satanist.
— Barack Obama is a Muslim.
— Klaus Schwab is a Roman Catholic:
— Anthony Fauci is Roman Catholic:
He was raised Roman Catholic. Attended a private Jesuit high school. He graduated from Jesuit founded College of the Holy Cross. He has never renounced. When the Anthony S. Fauci Integrated Science Complex was dedicated in 2022, Fauci wore his Holy Cross lab coat. The Catholic Church and plenty of priests claim him and brag on him for his “Jesuit ideals” and other such nonsense.
— Bill Gates is a Satanist:
Until recently Gates didn’t even hide it.
Gates and Microsoft openly sponsored Marina Abramović for years. It took an outcry for them to remove her from their websites. Years of whitewashing it to make it look like she’s not an open Satanist has not been successful because there is a plethora of evidence to the contrary. Including parties she threw for Gates that included fake blood on live naked models acting out ritual cannibalism with satanic writing on the walls.
Microsoft even used to have a highlights video on their website of one of these parties with Bill and Marim featured heavily.
— Barack Obama is Muslim:
Just one of dozens of pieces of evidence to this fact is Obama has been wearing a ring for at least 40 years that is adorned with the first part of the Islamic declaration of faith, the Shahada: “There is no god except Allah.” The Shahada is the first of the Five Pillars of Islam, expressing the two fundamental beliefs that make a person a Muslim: There is no god but Allah, and Muhammad is Allah's prophet.
Sincere recitation of the Shahada is the sole requirement for becoming a Muslim, as it expresses a person’s rejection of all other gods.
— Klaus Schwab is a Roman Catholic:
He was raised Catholic, has never renounced, has not publicly stated he is anti-Catholic nor, to my knowledge, has he ever been anything other than “accused” of be atheist. Meaning, there has been plenty of name calling but no evidence. Most Catholics don’t want to claim him because of what he’s doing. But that doesn’t change the facts.
Most of the high ranking Nazis were staunch Roman Catholics also but mankind keeps rewriting history or grabbing low hanging fruit to skip what makes them uncomfortable.
We just don’t learn from history.
Congrats! Top 50 is quite an achievement! :)
Re whether to ban people who “peddle madness”, I think it's a question of the manner in which it is done. If it is tentatively and humbly—without triumphalism or pontification—posited as a possibility along with some substantiation, then I would more than tolerate it, especially if openness to possibility of error is also admitted or implied.
Yes I agree. But I have a lot of experience with government plants, harassers, demoralizers, trolls, etc. So I have to be strict. I love eclectic theories and rarely dismiss anything. But denial of communist atrocities triggers me bad.
It’s the ol’ give an inch take a mile thing. Sometimes you just have to nip it in the bud!
wait did I actually use the word "peddle?" sheesh.
How do we find those rankings?
https://substack.com/leaderboard/culture/all