You are correct Celia, it was an excellent film. That is the reason people on the left can't handle it and try to discredit what it lays out plainly. Many have eyes but cannot see.
it's already clear to me that most vaccinated people will be dead or disabled within about 5 years of their first mRNA poisoning. The more interesting question is what will happen when they're all decomposed.
According to Dr. Ana we are all infected with the nanotechnology. The ones who have taken the shots are most at risk. I guess we are being shed upon and there are many other ways we are being infected. I vote for cremation, the thought of my body still giving out signals gives me the creeps.
Documentaries shouldn't be about left or right. It should be about the truth. Anyone with any sense knows politicians are corrupt and use events for self-gain. The rest of us are sheep in their game and comments like these prove they have us feeding out of their hand. This film is just more divide-and-conquer crap that we just create on autopilot.
I understand we are programmed to defend things we think are made in good faith, but the problem is that I never said it didn't lay out facts. It took decidedly partisan source material and made what appeared to be a partisan documentary. The puppets in power operate from the same playbook. What's the point of making this us vs. them if it the *them* is not UP?
I allege the following after seeing the film: a) a corrupt judge excluded evidence material to proving Chauvin's innocence; b) a corrupt police chief lied on the stand about not training his police in the exact technique the world saw Chauvin use -- kneeling on the shoulder blade (not the neck) of George Floyd;
c) a corrupt AG and ex-gang lawyer violated professional rules of conduct and should be disbarred; and
d) Attorney Crump, the Floyd family's lawyer, lied to the public about George's actions prior to and during the incident.
And unless you think I am white, I'm a member of a minority and a third generation American. Before seeing this documentary, I truly believed Derek Chauvin murdered George Floyd.
On the many facts shown in the film (and excluded from the news), he did not.
It's unfortunate that it seems "someone" sent someone to kill Chauvin before he might ask for a new trial. He deserves one.
And real time footage in the film should be included as evidence.
I can't help but compare what happened to Minneapolis' Precinct-3 police station with the Sderot, Israel, police station near the Gaza border on October 7th. Both represented not only destruction of buildings synonymous with law, order and justice, but, in the case of Minneapolis, the perversion of it contrasted with Israel's adamant refusal to bow to animalistic behavior and address their problem. The film was excellent! I never for a moment believed that the political/media narrative was anything but a Big Lie. But I had no idea of how emboldened that lie was or the extent to which feckless, corrupt officials amplified it. I agree with Derek Chauvin's mother, "I don't believe in the justice system anymore." It will be telling to see if the U.S. Supreme Court accepts the case and, if so, orders a new trial. Aside, it appears Chauvin will survive the 22-stab wounds he recently received in prison from a fellow inmate with FBI ties who purportedly drank BLM's toxic kool-aid.
this was so planned. city of minneapolis settled with the floyd family for $27M BEFORE the trial...after nyc had dragged out their settlement with the central park 5 for 15+ years?
really???
judge cahill didn't recuse himself since witness morries hall had a case pending with him?
all those bricks stacked and waiting for antifa thugs in kc and elsewhere?
blm riots across europe too?
usual cast of donor dem philanthropaths funding blm?
btw yesss let's stay on topic, all the trolls came out for this one because you're over the target Celia...arriba arriba
Actually Floyd sat out in the van after the merchant confronted him about the counterfeit bill and called the police, it showed him laughing in the video when he was confronted though doesn't state that's what was happening, I've seen it in other footage. Floyd could've left anytime before the police arrived, that part might be questionable as to why he chose not to.
As I mentioned in my comment, I lived in that area and shopped at that store occasionally. It's family owned (as it was destroyed of course during the riots, when I lived there back in the early to mid 90's they always checked every bill carefully, and they were mideastern and when you paid cash would give discounts when you spent over a certain amount of money.
There is another factor that should have been included in the film. (if my memory serves me correct from what I heard as "testimony,") From what I remember (I may be incorrect) this gal came out from Cup foods, during the delay and fake $20 time period, and asked George Floyd for a ride to just a short distance away. As I recall, she stated in testimony that "Floyd fell asleep TWICE behind the wheel." She asked him if he was OK?" while there, and he said he was "just tired."
So what kind of condition was Floyd in BEHIND THE WHEEL of that car? If he had driven off, how many people might he have killed if the fentanyl and other drugs kicked in? He might have killed three people and himself! Why is this being ignored?
There was so much material initially, and none of it was from body cams as they hid that evidence. I believe that's part of the footage that showed more details, and you're right none of it was included in the trial or this documentary. I also think that's the same woman who told Floyd to stop resisting. I also wonder if a transaction was occurring at the time, of what exactly one has to wonder. Neither of the other two that were in the car were anywhere near as high as Floyd was, if at all. They both tried to walk away, until one policeman called them back. I'm not sure about the woman, but the man refused to testify as he had the ongoing case pending in front of the presiding judge. FBI operatives?
There are many parallels to other psyops, but Floyds death was real, as was the cops actions, frame ups, and their jail time. Was Chauvin stabbed by a former gangmember/former FBI informant? I say likely so.
Yes. Great comments and mention of of the other things that were not included in the film that have important facets pertaining to the entire story.
Like you, I agree that Floyd died as stated, and the suspect in the stabbing is suspicious being former a FBI informant. The timing of this incident now, as the film came out, and calls for a new trial for Chauvin, tend to being indicative of a motive to silence him.
Most of what we hear with these major events are "partly true and partly fiction." I think a lot of these people that try to really stretch questions out to the point denial, claiming that "everything is fake" are either not tallying the total empirical evidence, or they are "plants" trying make all of us who look goofy, when we question the story.
Very true, and yes they give us partial truths while twisting it all to fit a narrative. It used to be to one side of the other, now on certain issues it seems to all lean to the same side. Maybe because people are seeing through their facade.
Psyop is one thing, but totally fake is another. Plants, Bots, or extreme believers in one side of the narrative or the other.
I wasn't necessarily disagreeing about a psyop type operation, and why I mentioned Floyd not leaving the scene, it was one bill he passed. However he was known at the store, and not a forgettable type of character.
I'll assume you didn't watch the whole movie, as if you had you may have caught things that might corroborate the possibility. Think of Floyd as a patsy like Oswald with a well known history going back his time in Houston. His behavior was known, especially as it correlated to his previous bust in MPLS. His Drug use, and trying to eat drugs on that one as well, though not as out of it in this instance. He was very attentive in the video in the store I mentioned, and then practically comatose while waiting in the van. WHY? The witness that didn't testify that had a case before the Judge overseeing the trial, the FBI's involvement almost from the beginning, if not even beforehand. Possible MK Ultra with voices involved. Why does Nancy Pelosi as shown in the video say "Thank you George Floyd for sacrificing yourself....". The Fire Truck that was within 7 blocks arrived at least 10 minutes after the Ambulance had already left, and there just happened to be a female firefighter present when the scene on the ground began to take place, and became an expert witness? The EMS crew not having the oxygen tube even unwound with tape on it holding it in a circle.
Just some of the observations I can recall, and like Steve said he recalls some other details he didn't see in the movie. It was a while back now, and many of the videos were not from police bodycams, so it is likely the documentary used verifiable footage they picked from. Why it's necessary to watch it all if only to gleam certain details that were definitely left out of the original narrative the whole world saw.
Celia, haven't watched the film but I looked at George Floyd at the time (and at the work of loads of analysts) and it was clear it was a completely staged event. Honestly, staged events occur day in day out - I catch quite a few in Australia without ever watching the news (I'd rather poke sticks in my eyes) and we see them all over - in Nepal, India, Sweden, France, Russia - you name it.
Celia, so many people are delusional. It’s as if truth and facts and (the necessary and sufficient) evidence and proof have given way to propaganda. This propaganda is ubiquitous. It’s almost as if a truth-seeking individual cannot pick a side. All sides are too heavily propagandized to be trustworthy. It’s horrifying.
If the film doesn't say that George Floyd's killing was faked then it's propaganda, right? Because it clearly was and I knew that at the start and so did loads of other people. If it does say it was faked then I'll give it a go but my impression is that it doesn't - can you confirm? It would be like watching a film on 9/11 that doesn't say the death and injury were staged. Why would I? I certainly did in the past before I knew it was but after I knew, any film that doesn't say that is propaganda as far as I'm concerned whether intentional or not and unless there's a particular reason to watch it I wouldn't.
Do you have any reason not to think the killing was staged assuming you think it was real?
No we do know because they TELL us Revelation of the Method style. They show us clearly that they took multiple takes. They show us images of the guy on the ground next to the police car that would have been taken from the pavement and then they show us an empty pavement ... and so very many more anomalies. Are you not very familiar with staged events? I've looked at dozens of them and they all have the same hallmarks.
I admit, when I saw your first comments I thought it odd that you had not watched the film first before commenting.
I watched the “allowed” videos at the time this was hot news, and I did hundreds and hundreds of screen shots, looking for discrepancies. Why? Because it reeked of a false flag, like so many other events.
When I watched the film, I thought, “Huh. That doesn’t quite line up with what I watched from the “officially sanctioned” video.
TPTP have false flags down to an art and science. The majority of people never catch on.
So, can I prove there were multiple takes? No, but also I analyzed the traffic, skies, and more and I was not convinced that what I was aligned with what I was told. What followed was extremely telling, with the BLM “peaceful protests” and more.
Tyranny is about lies and deception, and that is exactly what happened In Minneapolis.
I used to live not far from the Burn, Loot, and Murder Route. Everything about the entire debacle was a shit show.
So, I do have reservations about the movie. I admit, I was initially taken and and I found your comments a bit alarming, but after I thought about your comments and my own hours and hours of analyzing what I could access, I still think it was a staged event.
I will give an example of a discrepancy I noted from the “approved” video and the courtroom drama.
I noticed that passers by paid no attention to the cops whatsoever. They casually passed by without even a glance at what the cops were doing.
In the courtroom drama, there was a group of people with phones out and shouting at the cops. Where did they come from??? I saw no such thing in the sanctioned videos.
Regarding the ability to discern (so-called) “staged events” from real (or un-staged) events: you’re writing about confirmation bias and being a true believer in that bias. It’s self-deception. Like stupidity, there’s no cure for it.
There’s no way that you can tell an un-staged event from a staged event. You’re simply another propagandist who is trying to sell yourself as a truth teller.
Oh well. Believe what you will about George Floyd’s death being faked. There’s nothing that will cause you to doubt that you (and those who agree with you) are the only ones who know the truth.
“They have to stage events…” Even if SOME events are staged (and that’s a big “if”), how you and your ilk arrive at the certainty of what events are real and what events are fake is open to skeptical scrutiny and investigation. Once your investigative techniques are exposed, it’s plain and clear that YOU are lying propagandists too. The professionals peddling official narratives are also lying propagandists. There are plenty of liars who are preaching about what’s being faked. I’d ask you to “Think About It”, but some people are simply lost causes.
I too am a fellow Minnesotan who lived and owned a home on 40th and Oakland, and actually shopped at CUP Foods on occasion.
It was a real event, and the film (which I wasn't going to watch as I'd seen several of the videos and other released evidence after the trial) was well worth it and I'm glad I did take the time to watch it, as it allowed the people interviewed to make the claims regarding the FAKED TRIAL, and matched up the evidence showing the manipulation, and putting it altogether in one format instead of having to view all in separate pieces that didn't include much of what was included.
I personally think too much time is given to those who aren't willing to even view the film, and wouldn't be willing to spend time viewing any propaganda they posted, as EVERYTHING is propaganda in one way or another and has bias included. I"ll repeat the EVERYTHING HAS PROPAGANDA AND BIAS INCLUDED IN IT!!!
I happen to believe I can perceive the manipulative attempts to propagandize me and have the ability of discernment to separate it, though I'm sure bits and pieces may slip by.
I will say it's not just lack of journalistic standards but control mechanisims over media in general.
Could it be the film is structured, as opposed to staged? It seemed to be a chronological "staging" of events, as opposed to the random, selective videos provided by Deep State Media. I and the people I shared the link with found it to be a better description of the event in totality.
The film clips were "constructed or manufactured" by being *selected* from voluminous amounts of film from several different cameras worn or carried by several different people.
The tree "discrepancy" can simply be explained that in that article an older photo of Cup Foods was used. Perhaps photographed in winter of the previous year. Just because the article was dated in June doesn't mean the photo they used with the article was snapped in June.
I think the videomaker could have done a better job of explaining the anomalies - it's not just that photo, the tree looks different in three different images. Also, I put links to three videos for a reason ... and there's the problem of censorship. Videos get taken down and annoyingly there's not much written material. I looked at George Floyd when it first happened and there seemed to be loads of stuff. It's a bit of a chore to go through loads of rambling videos trying to find a good explanation of the fakery.
watched the Floyd crime footage thru arrest in entirety with great interest as to the new (to me) details from the body cams to compare to what I remember of the MSM narrative
Kitten they show more details all the way through the film. It's long but worth the time, and they show comparisons between the narrative and footage not allowed in the trial. They didn't include any footage not used by the MSM or the bodycams, and likely only verifiable footage, as there was more.
i wonder why didn't the film provide subtitles when floyd said on tape he was "hooping" which means a fetanyl enema?
There was lots lots more to say about Medical Examiner Andrew Baker changing his autopsy report. A black DC medical examiner came to Minneapolis at the meeting where Baker was pressured to change his report and this black dude said he had pull with the Washington Post and would/could smear Baker's name. This same DC medical examiner played a sinister role in J6.
I’ve watched the first half so far and everything it presented makes it so obvious how the psychopaths and social engineers screw with our perceptions. Funny that they chose 2020 to pull of this off while most people were at the mercy of the fear mongering and propaganda that was being fed non stop through the idiot box. All of a sudden there was this great cause that would appeal to all caring people showing how badly the police were. The controllers saw just how easy the misinformed would fall for their con jobs and since then there’s been one “noble cause” after another - J6, Russia, Hamas and lots more to come. If you don’t think you’re living in the Twilight Zone, then you are in for a big surprise.
The ultimate goal of all this nonsense is to make you a slave who’s unaware of it. At the same time the George Floyd fiasco was playing, Klaus Schwab was releasing his book Covid 19 and the Great Reset. The theme - You’ll own nothing and be happy - now even has it own holiday, Juneteenth, as a reminder to embrace your inner ignorant gullible self.
I watched the documentary and found it totally convincing. It fits in completely with the hideous anti-constitutional, anti-democratic acts rampant in the US in this "woke" era. I only hope that the 4 innocent policemen now languishing in jail receive justice and full exoneration and Floyd-family level reparations a soon as possible. My prayers are with Officer Chauvin---I hope he recovers from his wounds completely and is able to remain safe from now on until his release (hopefully soon!).
Infinitely more sinister. I feel like I am in a different country since 2020. A country run by Blackrock and Vanguard’s AI demon ESG neo-Marxist nihilism. And I am not exaggerating in the slightest.
Celia- i watched this with my husband last night- I think it was very eye opening for him- i knew about it- the funding from soros for democracy now etc- it was so very sad to see what happened to those people- the trauma- imagine being a policeperson- i can't -- they did a job on us here in Marin county- defunded our cops- the ones that are left are being trained into wokeness- that or lose their jobs- bad situation!
Celia, since I discovered you a couple of years ago, have been so impressed by your insights. Thank you so much for writing about interesting things and events. At the time of the trial I didn't think that Chauvin could get a fair one partly because many of the jurors were terrified of the crowds outside the courtroom. The film explained many things which were purposely hidden. Thank you and enjoy Spain!
I watched it and am very glad I did. Powerful accounting of the twin lie to "covid". My God what a toxic, deluded world this is.
if we don't act soon we will be done they'll walk all over us! the left needs to be destroyed
they are marxist commies!
You are correct Celia, it was an excellent film. That is the reason people on the left can't handle it and try to discredit what it lays out plainly. Many have eyes but cannot see.
None so blind as those that will not even look at evidence.
it's already clear to me that most vaccinated people will be dead or disabled within about 5 years of their first mRNA poisoning. The more interesting question is what will happen when they're all decomposed.
According to Dr. Ana we are all infected with the nanotechnology. The ones who have taken the shots are most at risk. I guess we are being shed upon and there are many other ways we are being infected. I vote for cremation, the thought of my body still giving out signals gives me the creeps.
Documentaries shouldn't be about left or right. It should be about the truth. Anyone with any sense knows politicians are corrupt and use events for self-gain. The rest of us are sheep in their game and comments like these prove they have us feeding out of their hand. This film is just more divide-and-conquer crap that we just create on autopilot.
I disagree. I think this documentary laid out a lot of facts.
I understand we are programmed to defend things we think are made in good faith, but the problem is that I never said it didn't lay out facts. It took decidedly partisan source material and made what appeared to be a partisan documentary. The puppets in power operate from the same playbook. What's the point of making this us vs. them if it the *them* is not UP?
What, in your opinion, was the partisan material?
I allege the following after seeing the film: a) a corrupt judge excluded evidence material to proving Chauvin's innocence; b) a corrupt police chief lied on the stand about not training his police in the exact technique the world saw Chauvin use -- kneeling on the shoulder blade (not the neck) of George Floyd;
c) a corrupt AG and ex-gang lawyer violated professional rules of conduct and should be disbarred; and
d) Attorney Crump, the Floyd family's lawyer, lied to the public about George's actions prior to and during the incident.
And unless you think I am white, I'm a member of a minority and a third generation American. Before seeing this documentary, I truly believed Derek Chauvin murdered George Floyd.
On the many facts shown in the film (and excluded from the news), he did not.
It's unfortunate that it seems "someone" sent someone to kill Chauvin before he might ask for a new trial. He deserves one.
And real time footage in the film should be included as evidence.
I can't help but compare what happened to Minneapolis' Precinct-3 police station with the Sderot, Israel, police station near the Gaza border on October 7th. Both represented not only destruction of buildings synonymous with law, order and justice, but, in the case of Minneapolis, the perversion of it contrasted with Israel's adamant refusal to bow to animalistic behavior and address their problem. The film was excellent! I never for a moment believed that the political/media narrative was anything but a Big Lie. But I had no idea of how emboldened that lie was or the extent to which feckless, corrupt officials amplified it. I agree with Derek Chauvin's mother, "I don't believe in the justice system anymore." It will be telling to see if the U.S. Supreme Court accepts the case and, if so, orders a new trial. Aside, it appears Chauvin will survive the 22-stab wounds he recently received in prison from a fellow inmate with FBI ties who purportedly drank BLM's toxic kool-aid.
this was so planned. city of minneapolis settled with the floyd family for $27M BEFORE the trial...after nyc had dragged out their settlement with the central park 5 for 15+ years?
really???
judge cahill didn't recuse himself since witness morries hall had a case pending with him?
all those bricks stacked and waiting for antifa thugs in kc and elsewhere?
blm riots across europe too?
usual cast of donor dem philanthropaths funding blm?
btw yesss let's stay on topic, all the trolls came out for this one because you're over the target Celia...arriba arriba
Actually Floyd sat out in the van after the merchant confronted him about the counterfeit bill and called the police, it showed him laughing in the video when he was confronted though doesn't state that's what was happening, I've seen it in other footage. Floyd could've left anytime before the police arrived, that part might be questionable as to why he chose not to.
As I mentioned in my comment, I lived in that area and shopped at that store occasionally. It's family owned (as it was destroyed of course during the riots, when I lived there back in the early to mid 90's they always checked every bill carefully, and they were mideastern and when you paid cash would give discounts when you spent over a certain amount of money.
Personally I think you're being manipulated.
There is another factor that should have been included in the film. (if my memory serves me correct from what I heard as "testimony,") From what I remember (I may be incorrect) this gal came out from Cup foods, during the delay and fake $20 time period, and asked George Floyd for a ride to just a short distance away. As I recall, she stated in testimony that "Floyd fell asleep TWICE behind the wheel." She asked him if he was OK?" while there, and he said he was "just tired."
So what kind of condition was Floyd in BEHIND THE WHEEL of that car? If he had driven off, how many people might he have killed if the fentanyl and other drugs kicked in? He might have killed three people and himself! Why is this being ignored?
There was so much material initially, and none of it was from body cams as they hid that evidence. I believe that's part of the footage that showed more details, and you're right none of it was included in the trial or this documentary. I also think that's the same woman who told Floyd to stop resisting. I also wonder if a transaction was occurring at the time, of what exactly one has to wonder. Neither of the other two that were in the car were anywhere near as high as Floyd was, if at all. They both tried to walk away, until one policeman called them back. I'm not sure about the woman, but the man refused to testify as he had the ongoing case pending in front of the presiding judge. FBI operatives?
There are many parallels to other psyops, but Floyds death was real, as was the cops actions, frame ups, and their jail time. Was Chauvin stabbed by a former gangmember/former FBI informant? I say likely so.
Yes. Great comments and mention of of the other things that were not included in the film that have important facets pertaining to the entire story.
Like you, I agree that Floyd died as stated, and the suspect in the stabbing is suspicious being former a FBI informant. The timing of this incident now, as the film came out, and calls for a new trial for Chauvin, tend to being indicative of a motive to silence him.
Most of what we hear with these major events are "partly true and partly fiction." I think a lot of these people that try to really stretch questions out to the point denial, claiming that "everything is fake" are either not tallying the total empirical evidence, or they are "plants" trying make all of us who look goofy, when we question the story.
Very true, and yes they give us partial truths while twisting it all to fit a narrative. It used to be to one side of the other, now on certain issues it seems to all lean to the same side. Maybe because people are seeing through their facade.
Psyop is one thing, but totally fake is another. Plants, Bots, or extreme believers in one side of the narrative or the other.
I wasn't necessarily disagreeing about a psyop type operation, and why I mentioned Floyd not leaving the scene, it was one bill he passed. However he was known at the store, and not a forgettable type of character.
I'll assume you didn't watch the whole movie, as if you had you may have caught things that might corroborate the possibility. Think of Floyd as a patsy like Oswald with a well known history going back his time in Houston. His behavior was known, especially as it correlated to his previous bust in MPLS. His Drug use, and trying to eat drugs on that one as well, though not as out of it in this instance. He was very attentive in the video in the store I mentioned, and then practically comatose while waiting in the van. WHY? The witness that didn't testify that had a case before the Judge overseeing the trial, the FBI's involvement almost from the beginning, if not even beforehand. Possible MK Ultra with voices involved. Why does Nancy Pelosi as shown in the video say "Thank you George Floyd for sacrificing yourself....". The Fire Truck that was within 7 blocks arrived at least 10 minutes after the Ambulance had already left, and there just happened to be a female firefighter present when the scene on the ground began to take place, and became an expert witness? The EMS crew not having the oxygen tube even unwound with tape on it holding it in a circle.
Just some of the observations I can recall, and like Steve said he recalls some other details he didn't see in the movie. It was a while back now, and many of the videos were not from police bodycams, so it is likely the documentary used verifiable footage they picked from. Why it's necessary to watch it all if only to gleam certain details that were definitely left out of the original narrative the whole world saw.
you think the op goes that deep? if so, that's really impressive
Celia, haven't watched the film but I looked at George Floyd at the time (and at the work of loads of analysts) and it was clear it was a completely staged event. Honestly, staged events occur day in day out - I catch quite a few in Australia without ever watching the news (I'd rather poke sticks in my eyes) and we see them all over - in Nepal, India, Sweden, France, Russia - you name it.
Discrepancy in trees - leafless and in full bloom https://www.bitchute.com/video/mF8kg0MsEuBM/
Predictive programming - George Floyd - appears in Obama's twitter feed May 17 (allegedly killed May 25) https://www.bitchute.com/video/VDftOD7zgGSE/
Evidence of multiple takes, a typical example of Revelation of the Method https://www.bitchute.com/video/o1JQvKOceuEh/
The film is just another example of the False Dilemma propaganda strategy they're so very fond of
A. Racist killing
B. Non-racist killing, something more sinister
Reality
C. Completely staged event
What is it, Petra, that causes you not to want to watch the film?
Celia, so many people are delusional. It’s as if truth and facts and (the necessary and sufficient) evidence and proof have given way to propaganda. This propaganda is ubiquitous. It’s almost as if a truth-seeking individual cannot pick a side. All sides are too heavily propagandized to be trustworthy. It’s horrifying.
there are some agents provocateurs on one side to be sure, but the official narrative is pure propaganda. You need a higher level of discernment.
It sure looks to me as if those some, who are working to debunk the official narrative, are doing their own brand of false propaganda.
If the film doesn't say that George Floyd's killing was faked then it's propaganda, right? Because it clearly was and I knew that at the start and so did loads of other people. If it does say it was faked then I'll give it a go but my impression is that it doesn't - can you confirm? It would be like watching a film on 9/11 that doesn't say the death and injury were staged. Why would I? I certainly did in the past before I knew it was but after I knew, any film that doesn't say that is propaganda as far as I'm concerned whether intentional or not and unless there's a particular reason to watch it I wouldn't.
Do you have any reason not to think the killing was staged assuming you think it was real?
“Because [the death of George Floyd] clearly was [faked] and I knew that at the start and so did loads of other people.”
Bullshit. You know nothing of the sort. You believe, but you don’t know. Same thing with these other anonymous “loads of other people”.
No we do know because they TELL us Revelation of the Method style. They show us clearly that they took multiple takes. They show us images of the guy on the ground next to the police car that would have been taken from the pavement and then they show us an empty pavement ... and so very many more anomalies. Are you not very familiar with staged events? I've looked at dozens of them and they all have the same hallmarks.
I admit, when I saw your first comments I thought it odd that you had not watched the film first before commenting.
I watched the “allowed” videos at the time this was hot news, and I did hundreds and hundreds of screen shots, looking for discrepancies. Why? Because it reeked of a false flag, like so many other events.
When I watched the film, I thought, “Huh. That doesn’t quite line up with what I watched from the “officially sanctioned” video.
TPTP have false flags down to an art and science. The majority of people never catch on.
So, can I prove there were multiple takes? No, but also I analyzed the traffic, skies, and more and I was not convinced that what I was aligned with what I was told. What followed was extremely telling, with the BLM “peaceful protests” and more.
Tyranny is about lies and deception, and that is exactly what happened In Minneapolis.
I used to live not far from the Burn, Loot, and Murder Route. Everything about the entire debacle was a shit show.
So, I do have reservations about the movie. I admit, I was initially taken and and I found your comments a bit alarming, but after I thought about your comments and my own hours and hours of analyzing what I could access, I still think it was a staged event.
I will give an example of a discrepancy I noted from the “approved” video and the courtroom drama.
I noticed that passers by paid no attention to the cops whatsoever. They casually passed by without even a glance at what the cops were doing.
In the courtroom drama, there was a group of people with phones out and shouting at the cops. Where did they come from??? I saw no such thing in the sanctioned videos.
Regarding the ability to discern (so-called) “staged events” from real (or un-staged) events: you’re writing about confirmation bias and being a true believer in that bias. It’s self-deception. Like stupidity, there’s no cure for it.
There’s no way that you can tell an un-staged event from a staged event. You’re simply another propagandist who is trying to sell yourself as a truth teller.
Oh well. Believe what you will about George Floyd’s death being faked. There’s nothing that will cause you to doubt that you (and those who agree with you) are the only ones who know the truth.
“They have to stage events…” Even if SOME events are staged (and that’s a big “if”), how you and your ilk arrive at the certainty of what events are real and what events are fake is open to skeptical scrutiny and investigation. Once your investigative techniques are exposed, it’s plain and clear that YOU are lying propagandists too. The professionals peddling official narratives are also lying propagandists. There are plenty of liars who are preaching about what’s being faked. I’d ask you to “Think About It”, but some people are simply lost causes.
I too am a fellow Minnesotan who lived and owned a home on 40th and Oakland, and actually shopped at CUP Foods on occasion.
It was a real event, and the film (which I wasn't going to watch as I'd seen several of the videos and other released evidence after the trial) was well worth it and I'm glad I did take the time to watch it, as it allowed the people interviewed to make the claims regarding the FAKED TRIAL, and matched up the evidence showing the manipulation, and putting it altogether in one format instead of having to view all in separate pieces that didn't include much of what was included.
I personally think too much time is given to those who aren't willing to even view the film, and wouldn't be willing to spend time viewing any propaganda they posted, as EVERYTHING is propaganda in one way or another and has bias included. I"ll repeat the EVERYTHING HAS PROPAGANDA AND BIAS INCLUDED IN IT!!!
I happen to believe I can perceive the manipulative attempts to propagandize me and have the ability of discernment to separate it, though I'm sure bits and pieces may slip by.
I will say it's not just lack of journalistic standards but control mechanisims over media in general.
Why don't you watch the second and third? They're not very long.
Could it be the film is structured, as opposed to staged? It seemed to be a chronological "staging" of events, as opposed to the random, selective videos provided by Deep State Media. I and the people I shared the link with found it to be a better description of the event in totality.
The film clips were "constructed or manufactured" by being *selected* from voluminous amounts of film from several different cameras worn or carried by several different people.
That's interesting.
I agree completely. Start with the facts. Continue with the facts. As with AIDS. As with 9/11. As with ...
great points✅
The tree "discrepancy" can simply be explained that in that article an older photo of Cup Foods was used. Perhaps photographed in winter of the previous year. Just because the article was dated in June doesn't mean the photo they used with the article was snapped in June.
I think the videomaker could have done a better job of explaining the anomalies - it's not just that photo, the tree looks different in three different images. Also, I put links to three videos for a reason ... and there's the problem of censorship. Videos get taken down and annoyingly there's not much written material. I looked at George Floyd when it first happened and there seemed to be loads of stuff. It's a bit of a chore to go through loads of rambling videos trying to find a good explanation of the fakery.
watched the Floyd crime footage thru arrest in entirety with great interest as to the new (to me) details from the body cams to compare to what I remember of the MSM narrative
Kitten they show more details all the way through the film. It's long but worth the time, and they show comparisons between the narrative and footage not allowed in the trial. They didn't include any footage not used by the MSM or the bodycams, and likely only verifiable footage, as there was more.
💝
It's just kayfabe, kayfabe, kayfabe, kayfabe.
very interesting bio of the producer of the Fall of Minneapolis https://www.amazon.com/stores/author/B01NAD39B0/about
i wonder why didn't the film provide subtitles when floyd said on tape he was "hooping" which means a fetanyl enema?
There was lots lots more to say about Medical Examiner Andrew Baker changing his autopsy report. A black DC medical examiner came to Minneapolis at the meeting where Baker was pressured to change his report and this black dude said he had pull with the Washington Post and would/could smear Baker's name. This same DC medical examiner played a sinister role in J6.
he hasn't tripped on anything yet now has he!
I’ve watched the first half so far and everything it presented makes it so obvious how the psychopaths and social engineers screw with our perceptions. Funny that they chose 2020 to pull of this off while most people were at the mercy of the fear mongering and propaganda that was being fed non stop through the idiot box. All of a sudden there was this great cause that would appeal to all caring people showing how badly the police were. The controllers saw just how easy the misinformed would fall for their con jobs and since then there’s been one “noble cause” after another - J6, Russia, Hamas and lots more to come. If you don’t think you’re living in the Twilight Zone, then you are in for a big surprise.
The ultimate goal of all this nonsense is to make you a slave who’s unaware of it. At the same time the George Floyd fiasco was playing, Klaus Schwab was releasing his book Covid 19 and the Great Reset. The theme - You’ll own nothing and be happy - now even has it own holiday, Juneteenth, as a reminder to embrace your inner ignorant gullible self.
I watched the documentary and found it totally convincing. It fits in completely with the hideous anti-constitutional, anti-democratic acts rampant in the US in this "woke" era. I only hope that the 4 innocent policemen now languishing in jail receive justice and full exoneration and Floyd-family level reparations a soon as possible. My prayers are with Officer Chauvin---I hope he recovers from his wounds completely and is able to remain safe from now on until his release (hopefully soon!).
Thanks, Celia. Those who do not desire civil discourse should be denied the company of those who do. The world has all the rancor it needs.
Truth 🌞 Tyranny 🤢😑
Radient Smiles 🥰 Masks 😷
Happiness 🥳 Fear 😱
Freedom 🗽 Serfdom. ⛓
Courage 🙋🏻♂️ Obedience 🤐🧟
Peace 🕊 Hell. 🦠🔥💣
Your choice, but time is running out.
Tyranny depends on your ignorance!
Infinitely more sinister. I feel like I am in a different country since 2020. A country run by Blackrock and Vanguard’s AI demon ESG neo-Marxist nihilism. And I am not exaggerating in the slightest.
how the F do we destroy them!?
UNITE AND RISE AGAINST EVIL GLOBALLASSED ABOMINATIONS OF ATHEIST CONMUNIST MARXIST SOCIALIST governmentally ill TERRORIST DERANGED SCUM OF EARTH
You forgot evil vile scum of the earth....they need to be crushed....they are like fn maggots!
WRONG I FORGOT NOTHING, I ALWAYS LEAVE ROOM FOR SOME PATRIOTS ADDITIVES. UNITE WITH GOD AND LIKE MINDED FOR RIGHTEOUSNESS
Celia- i watched this with my husband last night- I think it was very eye opening for him- i knew about it- the funding from soros for democracy now etc- it was so very sad to see what happened to those people- the trauma- imagine being a policeperson- i can't -- they did a job on us here in Marin county- defunded our cops- the ones that are left are being trained into wokeness- that or lose their jobs- bad situation!
Celia, since I discovered you a couple of years ago, have been so impressed by your insights. Thank you so much for writing about interesting things and events. At the time of the trial I didn't think that Chauvin could get a fair one partly because many of the jurors were terrified of the crowds outside the courtroom. The film explained many things which were purposely hidden. Thank you and enjoy Spain!