How (Exactly) The Censorship Industry Controlled 66 Narratives As Of 2020: "Today I'm Going To Break Down One Of The Biggest Government Scandals In The History Of The 21st Century--" Mike Benz
celiafarber.substack.com
How (Exactly) The Censorship Industry Controlled 66 Narratives As Of 2020: "Today I'm Going To Break Down One Of The Biggest Government Scandals In The History Of The 21st Century--" Mike Benz
Even If You Think You Know What This Industry Is Capable Of, There's A Next Level
I ask myself: How did I not know about this guy? Did you all know about him?
The 40 minute jaw-dropping (shocking but not surprising) clip here.
“DHS & EIP have put our Republic at risk. All those involved in these illegal schemes are traitors to America & should be treated as such. The entire operation is nothing less than a soft coup d'état with the goal of creating a one-party, totalitarian state.”
—Comment from same video on Rumble
I am listening to the censorship industry video now , as I write something that I recently discovered via an article about a home renovation and a freshly decorated apartment in Town and Country . The first article I read was about the estate that George Lucas and his wife Mellody Hobson renovated in Provence France . The author of the article said that Mr Lucas is into "The Story " but his wife Mellody is more about the "Narrative" -- hmmm , I had to think , what is the actual difference between the two ? According to Marcel Proust , the French author "In Search of Lost Time " - a story must have NO surprises . If a beautiful woman is in the room , she will play a part in the events . Darth Vadar does not just show up at the end , he was actually there in the very beginning , before the story even started , by being Luke Skywalker's very own father . So if a story has no surprises , then why are we interested in it , and oftentimes surprised ? Now comes the next article , a British Banker who wanted a Manhattan pied a terre -- and the decorator is quoted saying " You walk in and there must be a surprise . " So the box MUST have a surprise , and the surprise , according to Proust , is not in the story . So where is the surprise ? The surprise is in the narrative . The surprise is in the juxtaposition between the narrator and the story . We can easily get that Darth Vadar was Skywalkers father , but for Skywalker , it was a big surprise . Many different people could have narrated Gone With The Wind , but by getting the privileged daughter of a plantation to narrate the Civil War , she is actually surprised to discover her love for the land , and her love of the South . And we feel it as we see it all from her perspective . She goes from artificially getting her waist cinched , to laying in the field , pulling a turnip , calling to God that she will never be hungry again . So , what is going on inside of this connect a link info leak , where the story is the same old same old story - hunger is an old story , as is god bless the child who knows his father , but what are we being led into seeing , rather than the previous rationale ? And by which narratives ? What is the "Surprise" that we are being led to feel along with the narrator ? And why does it not feel right ?
Fascinating to me , was the interior of the home owned by Lucas and Hobson , painted a soft lichen green , inside trees are painted on the walls of a few of the rooms , a large natural slab of wood as the kitchen table , wood bowls filled with fruit , and Mellody wearing a dress in a print that looked like a photograph of a field of flowers . The story man who wrote the trip to outer space , got narrated by a heart devoted to Earth .
I think if you want to figure out the game plan of the narration of the time that we are living in , the multi point assault on the POTUS in 1963 should be first understood . A person who feels that they have ONE voice , and that is all that is necessary , does not think in terms of carbon copy voices . Yet every time you hear the news media say the same key word , over and over in every evening news broadcast all over the country , it is no different than the multi point assault - that eventually finalized via a young person shooting out of the gutter .
Ms Barbara Tomlinson taught us this in 1978 at my highschool . What is more important to understand is the nature of Narcissistic Personality Disorder , to understand that people , although seeming to be alive with bodies and lives , can actually be lingusitically programmed so far as to be considered AI . Until we understand the glitches that can occur inside of early childhood personality development , we will not understand that these "people" are actually linguistically programmed and programmable .
A simple test is a person who will interrupt you as you speak about an important idea , to correct your grammar or pronunciation , or in your writing point out misspelling . Regardless of the thought , the robot like expectation of language will be the first layer of enforced cohesion . There are ways to see through it . Rare is the original thought , and rarer still the human being who dares risk speaking it .
My wife's been a fan of his for about a year & we actually met him at a neighborhood event in Oakland a few months ago & he's a super nice & smart guy in person. He also helps out the Public crew (Shellenberger et al) w/research.