I Went Back And Listened To The First Sept 11 Newscasts and It Sounded Unnatural And Odd

All the emotions are off key

First, James Corbett’s excellent 4 minute summation of September 11 mythos here, if you have never heard it.

I’m returning to some September 11 materials I began to study yesterday.

I’ve decided not to say “nine eleven” (9/11) as that is the occultist’s language and symbolism as one.

First a disclaimer: People have spent over 20 years analyzing every available bit of evidence. What I am bringing up here would be kindergarten stuff to them, the seasoned researchers. All I tried to do was use my listening skills to analyze some of the newscasts that day, as well as some later documentaries, about people who allegedly called their loved ones from doomed flights. I'm just trying to use one of my strong skills—listening.

I didn’t look anything up, I just worked with what I found. Maybe this is teeth gnashing for seasoned 9/11 truthers. Kind of like me watching in astonishment as people who figured out about virus fraud in 2020 or later, don’t even try to understand the 34 year history of “No Virus,” in the AIDS war.

So this post is not for seasoned 9/11 truthers. It’s just my take on things they have been telling us tirelessly for two decades. I focused on voices, timbre, tone and words spoken. I’m afraid I’m wrong but I’m going ahead, even if it’s neither original nor scholarly. I do not believe the official narrative, how could anybody? I also haven’t studied it or developed a personal theory, apart from that I don’t think passenger planes flew into the buildings. I accept that the entire official narrative is impossible, absurd, and becomes weaker as the years go by. I’m just not interested in exactly what did happen. How they did it. I’m more concerned about what they will do next.

Nothing I write is intended to disrespect the people who lost their lives or their loved ones.

OK, over to my study of the voices.

I have found a clip that has taken up a lot of my time, due to how bizarre it sounded when I began to listen. Really, really strange. I don’t think my ear would have registered the “strange” back when it happened, but now it sounds almost shockingly off, and I wanted to post it to see if anybody hears what I hear.

The clip begins with a much younger Matt Lauer interviewing an author who wrote a biography of Howard Hughes. Then it cuts to the first news report about a plane hitting the first tower.

To my ear, the newscasters sound, first of all, weirdly calm, laconic, and emotionless, second of all, as though they are rehearsing in a high school play, a run through. They haven’t learned how to act yet. Their speech has a disassociated quality to it.

God forgive me if I’m wrong but it sounded very rehearsed.

I also wonder how they got these eye witnesses lined up, minutes after it happened. They have them all lined up, one after another. As if people chose to call in, set WNBC straight on the nearest phone, rather than run. Get out of there.

Especially one Tony Arrigo, who has gone down in “9/11 folklore” as the first eyewitness who gave an account.

He troubled me the most. He sounds like he’s acting, his expressions not quite honest. Exaggerated, and reminiscent of the Hindenburg broadcast. (Clip coming up.)

Why would Tony Arrigo, apparently a superintendent, who was emptying the building’s garbage, he said, drop everything and get to a phone to speak with WNBC within minutes of such events down the block from where he lived?
Wouldn’t he try to evacuate? How did he get through to WNBC and what motivated him? Some moments are more strange than others.

So (if this interests you at all) listen to Tony Arrigo, and pay particular attention from 7:30 to 7:34. The curious lip smacking.

And what about the second eye witness? He says he was on the Staten Island Ferry. How did he get hooked up with WNBC so fast? Did they have people from WNBC on the Staten Island ferry?

The eye witnesses in this clip sound, to varying degrees, odd. But somebody who buys the official narrative probably would not hear it.

They tell very different stories about what kind of plane they saw hit the first tower, Tony Arrigo saw a 737 while Richard said it was a “small business jet,” that was “grey on top,” (how could he see the top of it?,) Todd said it looked like a “huge jet fighter, or something.” Janice Huff, who the newscaster first seems to be implying is a staffer, dismisses this comment, and goes on to say she saw a “small jet plane,” and then, mid broadcast, she clues the newscasters in to a plane entering from a partially concealed angle. On live TV, while they themselves have choppers in the air, supposedly. “So there was another plane..?” says the flat-voiced newscaster. “Ooooh.” “You see it there on the right?” she asks. “I see it. I see it!” says the newscaster.

Previously they were reporting an “explosion,” only, in the second tower, and even said: “Again, there was no sign of any airplane close to that explosion.” (Female voice.)

”No.” (Male voice.)

Their tone of voice is as calm as anything I’ve ever heard on TV.

“Definitely could be a deliberate attack. If indeed this was an attack.”

As they are broadcasting both towers billowing smoke, they’re still hedging whether it “was an attack.” Because in journalism, you see, you try not to get ahead of yourself.

On CBS, meanwhile, an aviation specialist named John Nance called in to say he saw what was either a 767 or an Airbus 320. So we have a very broad range of airplanes people said they saw. From small jet plane to …airbus?

This clip shows no airplanes hitting the towers, just explosions.

I then listened to a documentary, as slick as all the 9/11 documentaries, that focused on the alleged phone calls made from people on the planes.

In this clip, there is a truly inexplicable clip of the mother (allegedly) of Mark Bingham, credited with trying to overpower the alleged hijackers on the alleged flight 93 that allegedly crashed in Shanksville, PA, with no debris. Alice Hoagland.

38:40, she says he called her from the doomed flight and curiously said: “Mom, this is Mark Bingham.”

At 39:00, we see the dramatization of what supposedly unfolded next: The call got cut off. She saw on TV that planes were crashing into World Trade Center in New York. She called him back, and…left a message? They play the message. How did the message surface? From Bingham’s cell phone in the field with no debris? The message is as peculiar as anything:

”Mark, this is your mom. Apparently it’s terrorists and they’re hell bent on crashing the aircraft, so if you can, try to take over the aircraft. Group some people and perhaps do the best you can to get control of it. I love you sweetie. Good luck. Bye bye.”

My sense was: There is no mother on earth who leaves a message like that for her son aboard a hijacked airplane.

Bye bye???

If you look her up you find articles about her death in 2021, and they report that she was “an inspirational figure for a gay rugby movement” her son founded. She was allegedly from Norwalk Connecticut.

But wait, her story changed in these articles. No longer was mom the inspiration behind the idea to “…try to take over the aircraft,” but rather:

”He was on United Flight 93 on Sept. 11, 2001, when hijackers commandeered it. He called his mother and told her he loved her.”

“I only got 3 minutes with him and when I tried to call back, I couldn’t get through,” Hoagland told the Iowa City Press-Citizen in 2019. “As a flight attendant for 20 years, I wanted to tell him to sit down and don’t draw attention to yourself.”

“But the 6-foot-5, 220-pound Bingham fought back, posthumously winning praise as an openly gay patriot who joined other passengers in foiling the hijackers and causing the plane to crash in rural Pennsylvania instead of its intended target, believed to be the U.S. Capitol.” (Same quote in several articles.)

”As a flight attendant for 20 years…she wanted to tell him to sit down and not draw attention to herself. But as a mother, she wanted him to “try to take over the plane.”

“Mark never received her voicemails, nor the dozens of others left by friends and family that day.” Monterey Herald, Sept 11, 2021

How did the news media “receive” the voicemail? How do they know he never received them?

”His heroic efforts on United Flight 93, as well as his athletic physique,^[3] were noted for having prompted a reassessment of gay stereotypes.<sup>[4][5][6][7][8][9]”

Wikipedia</sup>

Hoagland is described in article following her death as a champion of LGBTQ rights.

"Yes, LGBTQs can be heroes too, thank you for reminding everyone," Carney recalled Ms. Hoagland saying.”

In this clip below, CeeCee Lyles, flight attendant on flight 93 is said to have left a message for her husband while he was in the shower. At 9:47 am, on 9/11. The first tower in NYC was hit an hour earlier, at 8:46 am. Nobody called him? He didn't know? He was in the shower.

Why does she say, allegedly: “Please tell my children that I love them very much.”

Not “the children?”

Here’s an outtake, of just the voice message and people claim that at the end she says: “It’s a frame.” I can’t tell. The acoustics don’t sound like she’s on a plane.

Joe Biden was not in New York today, for any 9/11 ceremonies, but instead he was in Alaska, and gave these powerful words to the nation:

@PelosiStockPortfolio

“The guy who can't remember his own name is telling us never forget.”