93 Comments
User's avatar
Shona Duncan's avatar

Early in Trump's first term as president I had the worst feeling about him, that he was extremely dangerous but I also thought the same about Hillary Clinton. I didn't feel that way during this last election and I felt comforted by Tucker Carlson who said Trump was just a normal guy. But now I am re-evaluating things. How awful to demand a country surrender, and for what? It will be for money. It always is. Trump is a neocon. I realised I could not read Trump when he came out supportive of mRNA.

A.I. Grid and mRNA Shots Announced on Trump's 2nd Day in Office by Greg Reese

https://rumble.com/v6c9un1-a.i.-grid-and-mrna-shots-announced-on-trumps-2nd-day-in-office.html

Expand full comment
AwakeRedPilled's avatar

AI and MRNA needs to go.

Expand full comment
SmithFS's avatar

AI ain't going to go. Everybody's doing it, Trump has no choice but to support it, or the US will be unable to compete. China will just buy it. And then you will have AI.

Expand full comment
John Day MD's avatar

Israel can nuke Washington, NYC, London, Paris and Rome if they don't get what they demand; something to consider.

Expand full comment
Shona Duncan's avatar

I'm told the terrorists have nuclear bombs secretly stored in every major city in the world. The terrorists who coordinated the Covid-19 bioterrorist attack seem to be mostly of the Zionist persuasion. I'm reminded of a lot of threats against non (Ashkenazi) Jews through history. I started looking in that direction when I was trying to figure out who was behind the covid genocide. I found Zionists behind every mass culling in history, including WWII. They hated the Jews. I think they still do. The 'father of Zionism' Herzl even said they would have to kill the Jews to get their wealth, and to do that they would have to make friends with the 'anti Semites'. Herzl is celebrated every year in the Knesset. The more I learn the more disturbing the information gets.

Expand full comment
John Day MD's avatar

The Khazarian "mafia".

;-(

Expand full comment
John Sutton's avatar

All roads lead to The City of London.

Expand full comment
SmithFS's avatar

The Central Bank cult of psychopaths, Switzerland, London & Wall St. No doubt about it.

Expand full comment
Leslie's avatar

See annavonreitz.com

Expand full comment
Dave aka Geezermann's avatar

Can anyone trust anything that comes from the CIA? No. The CIA and the deep state WANT war, everywhere, all the time.

Trump has no plans to get the US into a "boots on the ground" war in Iran. This is all about ending the deep state tyrannical regime in Iran, and returning that nation to its people, without enforcing our "democracy" on them.

Expand full comment
Bruce Gillen's avatar

That is exactly what Bush said along with his supportive media pundits and religious leaders. Average Iraqi citizens wanted democracy but couldn't have it as long as Saddam remained in power. How did that work out???? The nation was left in ruins, Obama left behind hundreds of millions of dollars worth of modern military equipment, and a genocide began against Christians and Yazidis.

Expand full comment
The Real Mary Rose's avatar

Biden's brother made out like a bandit, made millions off the Iraq war.

Expand full comment
79SmithW60's avatar

I agree Dave. I think Trump's goal is very simple: 1) ensure that the IRGC regime can never get a nuclear weapon, and 2) do that without US "boots on the ground".

But the CIA also NEEDS and wants their boogeyman, Iran, to remain in its current form, so they may actually be against this in the big picture. However, the deep state does also need and always want continuous war to suit their totalitarian aims ("we have always been at war with Eurasia", to paraphrase that famous quote from 1984). I don't think the deep state/globalists are united in this one.

It does certainly look that we are now in direct support and likely will end up using our bucker buster bombs to ensure destruction of their facilities (with Isreal in a support role), and then Isreal back in the lead to finish up what they started.

Expand full comment
The Real Mary Rose's avatar

Did you ignore the reasons we invaded Iraq? All about what weapons they have.

I don't believe Iran is violating any international law by having nukes. Israel and the US have them. Russia has them. Why suddenly this focus on Iran's nuclear program?

I'm going to go with what Wesley CLark said, that the neocons will invade all those mideast countries... they have already. The last one on the list is Iran. It has nothing to do with "WMD."

Expand full comment
Bruce Gillen's avatar

Another reason they gave was that the people of Iraq wanted democracy but couldn't achieve it as long as Saddam remained in power. It has nothing to do with WMDs or helping to return a nation back to the people. It didn't happen in Afghanistan, Libya, Syria, or Iraq.

Expand full comment
79SmithW60's avatar

The same neocon Wesley Clark who nearly got us into WWIII in the 90's in Kosovo? Thanks to Sir Michael Jackson, we are still here. I believe nothing out of his globalist mouth.

I did not agree with the reasoning going into Iraq, nor of the regime change that was perpetrated because of the Bushes and their buddies.

Nor did I believe in the Arab Spring (US alphabet soup sprung) and the subsequent invasion of Europe and the US of refugees from the alphabet agency forever wars. Just look at the wonderful work by Killery and Tori Nuland in Libya, Syria, and other places in the Arab world. Bush, Wolfowitz and Cheney were no better...

I do have pause given that the Iranians have been "5 years away from a nuclear weapon" for the past 30 years... we probably agree more than we disagree Mary.

Expand full comment
The Real Mary Rose's avatar

So what do you disagree with me on?

That neocons are running the show?

If not, why is Mr. "peace"/"no wars" (which is what Trump ran on) getting us into WWIII now?

And obviously Gen Wesley Clark is one of the neocons - but he was 100% correct listing the countries that were to be invaded and destroyed.

Expand full comment
79SmithW60's avatar

I'm going to give Pres. Trump a chance with this one. He has earned that.

Trust, but verify.

Expand full comment
The Real Mary Rose's avatar

Goody for you. Hope you're not devastated when you find out he's just another war pres.

Expand full comment
SmithFS's avatar

Nuclear weapon has nothing to do with it. First off they know damn well that Iran has not being developing nuclear weapons and is at least 3yrs away if they did decide, in which case they wouldn't negotiate anything, which hasn't been the case.

The only way they could stop Iran from getting a nuclear weapon is by completely overthrowing the regime, and we all know how well that's worked in the far smaller, far easier countries of Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria, Somalia, Yemen & Libya.

And they don't need the centrifuges which Israel is trying to destroy with much bravo, they can instead use heavy water or graphite reactors and make the far superior plutonium bombs just as India, North Korea and Israel did.

And the clincher is nuclear weapons are 2nd rate to bioweapons now. One basement lab can engineer a pathogen that could destroy Israel. With modern biotech, genetic engineering, proven by the Covid bioweapon, that's where the danger is, not nuclear weapons.

Expand full comment
Bruce Gillen's avatar

Why didn't we do that with N. Korea if your thinking is correct? What happened to the strategy of mutually assured destruction? I agree the Iranian citizens do not like their dictatorial Islamic leadership. Going to war with Iran is about the dumbest thing we could do because that will draw in China and Russia against us.

Expand full comment
The Real Mary Rose's avatar

Yeah, it's irretrievably stupid. Thanks for pointing out that the US is grotesquely inconsistent with whom it decides is oppressing their people and needs invading. It's so laughable. They say Iran leadership is oppressive, but people are oppressed in every country. One could argue that the military response to LA protests is oppression.

Expand full comment
79SmithW60's avatar

Mutual Assured destruction (kind of an insane doctrine, but it worked with the two superpowers and each one's sphere of 'influence') was with the US and USSR. Things dramatically changed after the fall of the Berlin wall and the breakup of the Warsaw Pact countries.

Believe me, I am not in favor of another stupid war. I was against the regime changing doctrines of Bush 41, Clinton, Bush 43, BHO and FJB. The only one that kept us out of new wars was Trump. He's earned a chance to show what he and his team can do.

Expand full comment
SmithFS's avatar

Maybe the Psychopaths who run the Western World, being Malthusians & Misanthropes with a depopulation agenda, want WW3, they sure have been trying hard in the Ukraine, failed, so now trying their hand at Iran. So of course somehow they had to compromise Trump, since they failed to kill him.

Expand full comment
AwakeRedPilled's avatar

True, CIA are TRAINED to LIE as POMPEO said on video…

But a whistleblower and ex communicated may….may, be a truth teller.

Expand full comment
Livingdownunder's avatar

Of course he will-….I guess Miriam Adelson got her moneys worth after all. We shouldn’t be over there in the first place. Soon it will be “boots on the ground” followed by American Fathers, Mothers, Sons & Daughters returning home draped in an American Flag. We’re SUPPOSED to stay out of wars!…..except for when we’re beconed to do the bidding of “others”.

I’m very much aligned with TC on this….& CO & IC were both spot on w/Their assessment.

I had someone tell me this afternoon: “No Offence, but the USA is 🇮🇱 “little Bïṯčh”….and it certainly appears that way from where I’m standing as well.

It appears as though the Neocons & the Military Industrial Complex win again as per usual.

God Help Us

😞God Help Us All😞

Expand full comment
Dave aka Geezermann's avatar

Nothing is as it seems.

Expand full comment
SmithFS's avatar

I said that right from the beginning, if you think Trump is going to be pro-America and tell Israel to F-Off, you're dreaming. 90% of the US federal politicians are in Israel's pocket. So who you gonna choose?

There is still hope for Trump, but not on Israel. Israel is so far up Trump's ass you look down his throat you will see Netanyahu's nose.

But so far, he has killed the dangerous Ukraine nightmare, even Europe is giving up on Ukraine. That's a far worse war than Iran to get involved in, $300B down the sewer already.

He's done a lot of good on MAHA.

He's made giant improvements on the Energy/Green Agenda/Climate Change/Malthusianism UN/WEF depopulation agenda. That's a big one, really big, maybe the biggest.

He's done big improvements on the kyboshing the Soros/WEF mass migration, population replacement agenda. That's also a big one.

If you're looking for perfect you'll be still looking until the day you die, that's a guarantee.

Expand full comment
Livingdownunder's avatar

I voted for him 3 times

but I don’t like the Israeli influence on our Politicians (which a large portion have dual citizenship) & our foreign policy.

I’m sick & tired of seeing my American Brothers & Sisters come back in. Flag draped coffin or physically or mentally destroyed

Expand full comment
Livingdownunder's avatar

You saw the photo Op of him @ thhe wailing wall & of course the Kabala bracelet on Kushners wrist & the rest ……predictable…..sad…..but predictable.

And lets not even talk about the terrorists already in the country with the new undectable “vest”…..or the 8k Communist Chinese Nationals.

Expand full comment
Qlqxxqq's avatar

Well isn’t that special, a zionist actor telling us a zionist president is going to do what his zionist handlers ordered him to do.

Expand full comment
Thomas Vincze's avatar

The "Peace President" has revealed himself to be another run of mill war-monger.

The fool has, I believe, irreversibly destroyed his legacy with this regime change military campaign which he promised he would never conduct.

He has squandered any good will he had. Many of his supporters have now turned on him me included.

I voted for him in 2020 and in 2024.

He has morphed into George W. Bush.

Expand full comment
SmithFS's avatar

No he hasn't. If it weren't for Trump US boys would be dying in the muddy trenches of Ukraine by about right now. Instead the $300B Ukraine war is going down the sewer, even the EU is giving up on it. That's would have been worse than Iran, WW3 worse.

You figure you can allow AIPAC run amok and have no consequences for that, virtually all federal politicians are in Israel's pocket. Ban AIPAC and all PACs, that would be a great start. 100% public funded elections even better.

Expand full comment
Thomas Vincze's avatar

No. Trump could have stopped funding the Ukraine war. He continues to fund it and support it. If you look into the events that led to the war, he played a big role in that too.

He used to ridicule Obama about how he only provided pillows to Zelensky, but Trump the big man he is provided all this lethal weaponry to Ukraine.

Google it

I supported the guy in 2020. I knew the election was stolen from him. I continually made that point.

But his latest actions of bringing our nation into another senseless war crosses the line for me.

I've seen this dog and pony show before in the build up to "Operation Iraqi Freedom".

I have no illusions about him anymore. The mask is off.

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/world/trump-says-will-continue-funding-ukraines-war-effort-wants-something-r-rcna190555

Expand full comment
SmithFS's avatar

Trump has been doing a small fraction of support to Ukraine that the Biden regime was doing, and undoubtedly Obama would have done also, if he was President (some say he was defacto President in the last term).

Collective West support for Ukraine melts away, The Duran:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Or51mkygM4k

Expand full comment
Gina Kelly's avatar

No help for Israel no, war.

Expand full comment
Jack Jones's avatar

So much for a new look America.

Expand full comment
Desiree Flores's avatar

What is appalling is that after the dust settles and the bodybags are buried, the rubble has been cleared, the next generation may read a book where it is blatantly stated that the banksters funded both or all sides of the wars. The author(s) will be slammed and side-lined although the book(s) is/are full of factual receipts, the show must go on it seems, go figure...First world war, still no end in signt by Frank Furedi. Guido Preparata. Arthur Ponsonby, 10 rules of war by Anne Morelli.

Grüß Gott!

Expand full comment
BumbleBee's avatar

Anybody else notice that the absolutely unpayable global debts are rapidly coming due (financial derivatives are in the quadrillions while banks and governments all over the world are deeply insolvent), and the Zionists believe in a religious duty to destroy the world so they get raptured to heaven by their psychotic “god”, whatever it actually is (alien race? Figment of imagination? Garbled prophesy? Who knows?)

Good time for the Zionist banksters to ramp up “the final solution” against all the pesky creditors they owe but can’t pay back, so they can collect on what they believe their god owes them.

You can’t fix unmitigated greed.

Expand full comment
SmithFS's avatar

The Banksters could give a damn about "Zionism". Israel is just another puppet state like the Ukraine and provides good cannon fodder. If every Israeli gets slaughtered in order to cement their World Totalitarian Neo-feudal Oligarchy, they wouldn't shed even a single tear. Look how many Israelis they killed with their Covid & MRNA jab draconian policy there?

Expand full comment
richardw's avatar

Also don’t forget this book which uses preparata et al “two world wars and hitler, who was responsible ?”

Expand full comment
Sean O'Dalaigh's avatar

So lemme get this straight. The US, at Israel’s behest got in the mix with Iraq, Afghanistan and Libya with no strategy on how to nation built after they Won Ze War - all these countries are destroyed politically and economically. And now they fancy a spot of ye olde ‘regime change’ in Iran? Retarded at best☘️

Expand full comment
Melvyn Punymeyer's avatar

Not Israel's behest, Britain's. Remember those 16 words from GWB's speech in 2003? They came straight from London, not Tel Aviv. The Brits use Israel as squid ink to conceal their role in everything.

Expand full comment
VickieDawn's avatar

I think it's highly likely that attacking Iran has been a US Operation from the beginning. Remember what General Wesley Clark said way back in 2002-2003, the US MILITARY was poised to take out 7 countries ending in Iran?

Expand full comment
Charles Summers's avatar

The object is to create $10 gallon gas and ration it to us. Remember the Arab oil embargo? I guarantee that the cabal remembers how to do it.

Expand full comment
Dave aka Geezermann's avatar

Not many people are aware of the real history of Obama, a true Manchurian Candidate and traitor.

https://open.substack.com/pub/susandaniels/p/all-roads-lead-to-barack-obama-92b?r=1657tz&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=email

Expand full comment
The Real Mary Rose's avatar

Most of the people who read this column are. What does this have to do with Trump going to war with Iran?

Expand full comment
ultradarkmaga's avatar

this time he won't be rescued from impeachment

Expand full comment
Stan Sylvester's avatar

"If my sons did not want war, there would be none." Gutle Schaper, wife of Mayer Amschel Rothchilds, mother of his 5 sons.

Keeping up with the family tradition?

Expand full comment
Desiree Flores's avatar

fyi: Fake Nukes w/ George Webb

A recording from The Duke Report's live video

The Duke Report on Sub.

It is said that the Rand Corporation is in Santa Monice, nice and close to Holly-wood...

Grüß Gott!

Expand full comment
kilquor2nd's avatar

At a glance - the thinking person's recusing of uk-nl stasis - is my first view

200 Ma Mini microraptor ,butterfly on wasp both on Libelle - says exactly same . just top 7 photos at www.sofiamusicschool.nl ,forget blurb - 5th from bottom of page .

Why is antartica such a threat to rockerfeller stasis ?

Expand full comment
Billy Thistle's avatar

This may be the only ray of light in this otherwise dark scenario. Nukes as WMD seem to be fake. Sounds like Duke has got it right from the start. For those who need a more in- depth, bookish approach, I recommend Akio Nakatani, Death Object: Exploding the Nuclear Weapons Hoax. Also Simon Charles Smith, Fake Aliens and the Phony Nuke World Order. Then there's the godfather, Reato West w/ his Big Lies website, lots of videos.

Expand full comment
SmithFS's avatar

Give me a break. The things people believe. Sounds like a run-of-the-mill CIA disinformation effort.

Expand full comment