Jon Rappoport Casts New Light On Pfizer Docs: Long List Of Adverse Reactions Were Master List Of All Possible Reactions, Based On Past Vaccines
“We are publishing the correction at the top of my blog post, but leaving the article intact. The huge master list of medical conditions is still very relevant, for the reason I stated in my correction.”
Email 10:35 am from Jon Rappoport to me
Here below is an email I got from Jon Rappoport this morning, regarding a correction as well as an expansion of our story about the Pfizer smoking gun documents. His article from today is here.
Jon has reactive and interpretive instincts as a writer and journalist that are second to none. A journalist has to know how to react, above all, and to interpret, and story/dot connect. When I heard from Jon right after I posted this, I knew we had a whale on our fishing line.
Rappoport is a national treasure who only gets better all the time. He’s got no fillers, no entities interfering with his clarity of mind or soul. A distiller and a story teller. (A story teller knows how to tell a story, as opposed to package facts.)
I’ve known him since the late 1980s, when his pioneering book AIDS Inc: Scandal Of The Century came out. His very popular newsletter and website is NoMoreFakeNews.com. But you know this already!
Here below is Jon’s email from this morning, about the Pfizer Document, which he did not fail to react to in the manner that the document called for. He asked me, over the weekend, why I thought Pfizer would do something so apparently suicidal as put all this into black and white. (He also had the document authenticated by a lawyer.) I answered that I believe they are advanced bureaucratic technocrats who are obsessed with their own linguistics and with self-documentation. Also they take death very lightly.
From Jon, Dec 7, 10:25 am:
Celia,
After I published my piece on the secret document, Tom found some problems.
I'm appending a correction to my blog post. Here it is:
CORRECTION: After publishing this article, I discovered that the gigantic Pfizer list of medical conditions was apparently not a report on logged cases of adverse events, but instead a complete list of conditions that Pfizer would be monitoring, in order to see whether they popped up on their radar as reactions to the COVID vaccine.
Why would Pfizer publish this extraordinary list? Because as they state, these medical conditions have been associated with severe COVID-19 “and vaccines in general.” In other words, vaccines in general, historically, have carried enormous risk and dangers over an incredibly wide area of medical conditions. This is a key confession.
Further, if you read the full secret Pfizer document, you will come to Table 7, which does list a number of categories of adverse reactions, all of which WERE reported in the first three months of the Pfizer vaccine rollout. This IS stunning.
In the secret document, Pfizer does list 1223 deaths occurring after just three months of the vaccine rollout. This should have been sufficient to cause a complete halt to the vaccination program.
Finally, Pfizer admits that in the first three months of the vaccine rollout, it logged a staggering 42,000 cases of adverse reactions. And as far as I can determine from the Pfizer document, these 42,000 cases represented a total of 139,000 adverse events. In other words, in many cases, there were reports of multiple adverse events.
----OK, that's my correction. That's my best analysis of what the Pfizer document does and doesn't say.
Jon
PS. Thank you Tom. You have an eye for detail like nobody I have ever known and I’ve told you this. And thank you also to the reader who wrote me and pointed this out, late last night. I looked for your email to thank you by name but couldn't find it. Who was it? This publishing entity is a symbiotic organism. And I believe in “fruitful errors.” And I think our whale is truly a whale.
—CF
The biggest con of our era is that so many people think the definition of the word vaccine means "safe and effective" no matter if it's 1 or a million in a row. I remember when vaccine mandates started on children in California and then they removed exemptions. To those arguing in favor, I asked if there were any number of mandatory vaccines that would give them pause. They had nothing to say, to which I said, "well get ready for an unlimited number of them, once mandates are accepted."
Then cognitive dissonance kicked in.
It may be shocking and disturbing to see (and understand) that all vaccines carry significant risks of adverse events. That’s a topic for another day, certainly. But as has been pointed out in other outlets, once there are a relatively small number of deaths associated with a vaccine or vaccine trial, such as there were with the Swine Flu trials, the vaccine is deemed unsafe and pulled from further testing. There were dozens more deaths with the mRNA/Covid19 vaccine (Pfizer) as compared to previous vaccine trial deaths and yet this vaccine has not only remained in-use but was pushed through to get full FDA approval. How can anyone, knowing what we know right now, say this is not a self-serving profit interest over public health? Or, some sinister attempt at population control...?