Feb 5, 2022·edited Feb 5, 2022Liked by Celia Farber
We can still share common goals (e.g. overthrow of mandates in all forms, justice for all complicit in genocide, restoration of government to Founder's intent, revelation to Americans of depths of corruption at all levels, revelation of extent of genocide) while still iterating through who is most trustworthy. If people have reservations about Malone or McCullough, they can share that concern with others, while simultaneously acknowledging, sharing with others, and advocating for whatever things Malone, McCullough rightly condemn.
The Diana West article you shared, however, is a must read for all those who put trust in Malone.
The momentum is building to such an extent that even if Malone or McCullough are running interference for Big Pharma, the CIA, their own medical priesthood, etc. they are causing the house to so crumble, they too, will ultimately be crushed under the weight of it. Once the dam breaks, putting the water back isn't an easy thing.
Regarding what the Bible has to say, recall also that Jesus, John the Baptist, and the apostles called out sin and injustice with very direct language that would offend many today. Jesus called the religious leaders of his day fools and blind guides. John the Baptist called people snakes and vipers. There is a time to overlook and there is a time to call out the works of darkness. Both are love.
There is this concept in Jewish thought that we should "judge favorably". I will preface my statement by saying that I do not I always do this. It is an aspiration. But it is a good practice, for our own mental health and for the sake of relating well to others, that we give people the benefit of the doubt, we practice forbearance, that we see the good in others.
I don't think that this means that we need to do so when we are contending with demonstrable predators, but this is the way to go when dealing with most of the good and "normally" flawed people we encounter.
Self-interest also demands this because it is necessary to be charitable toward ourselves, and it is hard to do so when we are constantly seeing how bad and how wrong everyone else is.
There is a big difference between judgement and discernment particularly when there are moral concerns. I sign my emails with this quote from one of my favorite Van Morrison songs:
Feb 5, 2022·edited Feb 5, 2022Liked by Celia Farber
Idling cars
By Grasshopper Kaplan
December came all washed away
November now already, but it was just May.
Maybe you're telling me a lie I should believe.
Maybe I'm showing you the ghosts up my sleave...
The memory of a crime
A memory not mine.
Should we be sharing all this so soon ?
Joke's on me, as you waltz across the room.
Gave my address, that's nowhere now. Give my love but. That's gone somehow.
The memory of a crime
A memory not mine.
Oh I'll be leaving as soon as I can stand
Seeing as I'm not wanted, its written in your hand.
In your eyes I see reflections if the stars.
Melting in the heat of all these idling cars...
The memory of a crime...
A memory not mine.
Grasshopper Kaplan is my legal name and YouTube, they have destroyed my life since long before I ran for mayor of s f 2007 which one can not do anonymously
Fyodor Dotoevsky says, as my mom kept reminding me...
Hi Celia: I like your rendition of Bill Gates from a line of poetry. Here is mine of Fauci from a line by Dylan Thomas: "Incarnate devil in a talking snake'. Thank you for letting me know about Transtromer's work: I am running to find out more about it.
Thank you Duchess, I am actually very unsure what was going on when I wrote that but I'm getting at something, and have decided not to worry about that "what am I actually talking about" feeling.
My late friend Rob, I can hear his gentle voice saying "...and Cel, we're all in this thing." This was well before Covid. "We're all in this thing." We are all...in this ....thing...together. It's both shattering and unifying, lonely, desperate, and newly intimate.
Rob died two months "before Covid."
I'm trying to think about how to even attempt to give words and voice to this..."THING" and I know it's impossible, but maybe it's worth trying. I say one thing, you all say other things, and we are at least chirping for our lives from our nests. Signaling that we are alive, and that we need something urgently. Like baby birds do.
Oh I am so sorry. But you are right, we are all in need of something and like baby birds....and I think you got so very close to what we who are looking at this evil, feel. Maybe it is a deep yearning in our souls for something incandescently eternal. That cannot be grasped or touched with our rational minds or even our emotions..maybe it is the cry from our souls.
And you have no idea how gracefully you are expressing the "thing". Love, longing, loss. What I love about what you wrote is it can be read and re-read, and each time i find something in my being that responds...to different words and phrases each time.
I know this sounds silly, but every time I read it I feel like a plant being watered.
Celia, Thankyou for your deeply thoughtful, literate, and philosophical musings. This seemed to be a bit off-piste from your ‘usual fare’. But as I like to say, “off piste” is good piste. Great balm for troubled times.
Truth telling is not J'Accuse. Indeed science works only if it is true. If not true but passionately defended as true do we have a moral obligation to keep quiet? I think not. So then with scientific medicine if we walk the science back 100 years we see cognitive capture by Rockefeller interests. This is merely history. The cartel mis-education of doctors in the interest of Rockefeller profits is more than 100 years old and began when they bought the AMA cartel. https://www.thelibertybeacon.com/john-d-rockefeller-used-ama-take-western-medicine/
Actually, it wasn't a case of Rockefeller interests "buying the AMA", it was a matter of Rockefeller interests building the AMA. The AMA didn't start out as something noble that was subverted by wealthy control freaks, it started as a grifter organization whose creator(s) quickly attached it to monied interests with the resources to take it to its logical conclusion.
The American Medical Association (AMA) had already been formed in 1847 by Nathan Smith Davis. Davis had been working at the Medical Society of New York with issues of licensing and education. While the pretense was always more rigorous standards toward the supposed end of effective treatments, exclusion was the reality. Hence it was no surprise that in 1870, Davis worked successfully to prohibit female and black physicians from becoming members of the AMA.
The AMA formed its Council on Medical Education in 1904 as a tool to artificially restrict education.11 However, the AMA's conflict of interest was too obvious. This is where Abraham Flexner and the Carnegie Foundation entered the picture. Flexner's older brother Simon was the director of the Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research and he recommended his brother Abraham for the Carnegie job. Abraham's acceptance of the role was the perfect special-interest symbiosis. Carnegie's desire was to advance secularism through higher education, thus it saw the AMA's agenda as favorable toward that end. Rockefeller's benefactors were allied with allopathic drug companies and hated for-profit schools that couldn't be controlled by the big-business, state-influenced foundations. Last of all, the AMA got an objective-appearing front in Carnegie.12
Not only was Abraham Flexner not even an allopathic physician; he was not a widely known authority on education,13 never mind medical education, as he had never even seen the inside of a medical school before joining Carnegie. His report was already effectively written, since it was essentially the AMA's unpublished 1906 report on US medical schools. Furthermore, Flexner was accompanied on his inspection by the AMA's N.P. Colwell to insure the inspection would arrive at the preordained conclusions. Flexner then spent time at the AMA's Chicago headquarters preparing what portion of the final product was his actual work.14
Yes, that's pretty much how I understand the history as well. The AMA was never a noble organization that became corrupted by money, it was a grift from the beginning that really only spread in influence once wealthy hobbyists began to fund it for their own purposes.
Thank you for sharing Tranströmer’s poetry. “Don’t be ashamed of being human…” says it all. If all beings were to actually grasp and feel what is happening in our world right now there would be a lot of weepin’ an’ wailing. I can feel the losses especially the ones that are about to come. To not run away from this feeling I root myself as deep as my feet are willing. For me it takes an ever vigilant, gentle kind of focus to notice that accusation is the undigestible stone I swallow from time to time to keep sorrow from rising. As I was reading this post it dawned on me that perhaps accusation is the comfort food for a people who turn their backs on grief. Accusation is the false savior riding in on his high horse, like a lame lawyer presenting the jury with a complaint, a measly charge of wrong doing, a lifeless dictum, a flabby piece of paper, a carefully crafted document devoid of meaning, devoid of honor, devoid of love. And yet here I am accusing accusation, ruffling my own feathers, heaving up the heavy stone, reaching inside my ancestral closet, insisting that out of darkness beauty sprouts, out of the shadows love wants to rise, to flow, to erupt in a river of tears. I call upon the “kind” in mankind and womankind. To witness is an act of “kind”. Our kind is in need of a witness. To witness is kind. To grieve is kind, to gaze upon the unkind is kind, to express is kind, to know who we are is kind, to open our mouth and sing out loud is kind, to open our mouth and sing softly is kind, to open our anything is kind. And how timely to share Marshall Rosenberg’s heart opening work. He was a master at holding and teaching how to hold a potent witness space, a dignified kindness, how to hear and recognize the feelings and unmet needs parading as accusations directed to others or at ourselves. I studied with Marshall back in 2000. I loved watching the video again. Thanks Celia for another enlivening post and thank you to all who are part of this community!
Thank you Celia. Indeed it is a time of reflection and activation. COVID being a kind of Bolshevik revolution is not only thought provoking but incredibly worrying as we digest the depth to which this revolution for our bodies, our minds and children has progressed. It is our most highly educated who are the drivers at least those in positions of careerist materialist influence to bring Steiner into the conversation.
What do we do? I am i. NYC and am seeing my entire family, friend and professional network dissolve under the spell of being part of the elite highly educated professional class. Devastating as I have come to use the word cowards as the only way to reconcile the behavior. I feel lost. How can such intelligent people be so devoid of critical thought. Ahrimanic spiritual influence, perhaps. I feel that so many of us are faced with this confounding and disorienting state. What do we do next?
Being a life long sailor I appreciate the wisdom of the saying. There are many ways to reach your destination, which may also include trimming sails and making course corrections to avoid foul weather :)
I haven't watched this yet, but just a heads up that the (Reiner Fuellmich) 'Grand Jury | Day 1" has ended for the day; and the replay is available on Odysee and Rumble.
Before viewing the "Grand Jury | Day 1" attorney statements, it's very informative to first watch the following conversation where Fuellmich explains how these model Grand Jury proceedings will set the stage for real prosecutions intended to completely dismantle the individuals and corporations responsible for this plandemic:
January 26, 2022
Reiner Fuellmich: How a Grand Jury Will Prosecute Covid Crimes
To disagree does not carry with it inherent hostility. It is simply negation of a proposition. Accusation is inherently hostile.
As a math teacher, I’ve noticed for years, students having a personal attachment to being right and students being hurt and offended when they were shown to have made an error. As the years have passed, and some of those students became teachers, the same ego attachment to correctness now exists among the educators. Math is the closest thing humans have to objectivity, and even that pursuit has now been tainted by ego attachment to correctness.
The only hope as I see it is for each of us who want others to detach from accusation (a nice word for this), is for us first to detach from it ourselves. Too many of us think that others are the problem (an accusation). Case in point: how often do we think we’re the only ones who know how to drive? Until we can recognize our own contributions to the messes around us, accusations will dominate us, and therefore hostility will dominate us.
We can still share common goals (e.g. overthrow of mandates in all forms, justice for all complicit in genocide, restoration of government to Founder's intent, revelation to Americans of depths of corruption at all levels, revelation of extent of genocide) while still iterating through who is most trustworthy. If people have reservations about Malone or McCullough, they can share that concern with others, while simultaneously acknowledging, sharing with others, and advocating for whatever things Malone, McCullough rightly condemn.
The Diana West article you shared, however, is a must read for all those who put trust in Malone.
The momentum is building to such an extent that even if Malone or McCullough are running interference for Big Pharma, the CIA, their own medical priesthood, etc. they are causing the house to so crumble, they too, will ultimately be crushed under the weight of it. Once the dam breaks, putting the water back isn't an easy thing.
Regarding what the Bible has to say, recall also that Jesus, John the Baptist, and the apostles called out sin and injustice with very direct language that would offend many today. Jesus called the religious leaders of his day fools and blind guides. John the Baptist called people snakes and vipers. There is a time to overlook and there is a time to call out the works of darkness. Both are love.
There is this concept in Jewish thought that we should "judge favorably". I will preface my statement by saying that I do not I always do this. It is an aspiration. But it is a good practice, for our own mental health and for the sake of relating well to others, that we give people the benefit of the doubt, we practice forbearance, that we see the good in others.
I don't think that this means that we need to do so when we are contending with demonstrable predators, but this is the way to go when dealing with most of the good and "normally" flawed people we encounter.
Self-interest also demands this because it is necessary to be charitable toward ourselves, and it is hard to do so when we are constantly seeing how bad and how wrong everyone else is.
This is the website of the organization that promotes this approach to living.
https://cchf.global/
There is a big difference between judgement and discernment particularly when there are moral concerns. I sign my emails with this quote from one of my favorite Van Morrison songs:
If my heart could do my thinking
And my mind began to feel
I’d look upon the world anew
And know what’s truly real
It’s a great song. Have a listen
https://youtu.be/xzz3-NPwgjo
Found on FB, but applies here...
....When the power of Love overcomes the love of power there will be Peace..
Jimi Hendrix
Idling cars
By Grasshopper Kaplan
December came all washed away
November now already, but it was just May.
Maybe you're telling me a lie I should believe.
Maybe I'm showing you the ghosts up my sleave...
The memory of a crime
A memory not mine.
Should we be sharing all this so soon ?
Joke's on me, as you waltz across the room.
Gave my address, that's nowhere now. Give my love but. That's gone somehow.
The memory of a crime
A memory not mine.
Oh I'll be leaving as soon as I can stand
Seeing as I'm not wanted, its written in your hand.
In your eyes I see reflections if the stars.
Melting in the heat of all these idling cars...
The memory of a crime...
A memory not mine.
Grasshopper Kaplan is my legal name and YouTube, they have destroyed my life since long before I ran for mayor of s f 2007 which one can not do anonymously
Fyodor Dotoevsky says, as my mom kept reminding me...
Never give up hope never lose hope....
Hi Celia: I like your rendition of Bill Gates from a line of poetry. Here is mine of Fauci from a line by Dylan Thomas: "Incarnate devil in a talking snake'. Thank you for letting me know about Transtromer's work: I am running to find out more about it.
Ahriman would enter the earth, Steiner said, around 1998, through electromagnetism, and its nature would be “perfectly cold.”
Then Ahriman is literally in the internet.
I am definitely not afraid to use my real name to tell you that I, for one, love seeing pictures of Jack and Lewis!
Celia, this is gonna take some re-reading...but it is stunning. In all senses of the word.
Thank you Duchess, I am actually very unsure what was going on when I wrote that but I'm getting at something, and have decided not to worry about that "what am I actually talking about" feeling.
My late friend Rob, I can hear his gentle voice saying "...and Cel, we're all in this thing." This was well before Covid. "We're all in this thing." We are all...in this ....thing...together. It's both shattering and unifying, lonely, desperate, and newly intimate.
Rob died two months "before Covid."
I'm trying to think about how to even attempt to give words and voice to this..."THING" and I know it's impossible, but maybe it's worth trying. I say one thing, you all say other things, and we are at least chirping for our lives from our nests. Signaling that we are alive, and that we need something urgently. Like baby birds do.
Oh I am so sorry. But you are right, we are all in need of something and like baby birds....and I think you got so very close to what we who are looking at this evil, feel. Maybe it is a deep yearning in our souls for something incandescently eternal. That cannot be grasped or touched with our rational minds or even our emotions..maybe it is the cry from our souls.
And you have no idea how gracefully you are expressing the "thing". Love, longing, loss. What I love about what you wrote is it can be read and re-read, and each time i find something in my being that responds...to different words and phrases each time.
I know this sounds silly, but every time I read it I feel like a plant being watered.
Celia, Thankyou for your deeply thoughtful, literate, and philosophical musings. This seemed to be a bit off-piste from your ‘usual fare’. But as I like to say, “off piste” is good piste. Great balm for troubled times.
Truth telling is not J'Accuse. Indeed science works only if it is true. If not true but passionately defended as true do we have a moral obligation to keep quiet? I think not. So then with scientific medicine if we walk the science back 100 years we see cognitive capture by Rockefeller interests. This is merely history. The cartel mis-education of doctors in the interest of Rockefeller profits is more than 100 years old and began when they bought the AMA cartel. https://www.thelibertybeacon.com/john-d-rockefeller-used-ama-take-western-medicine/
Actually, it wasn't a case of Rockefeller interests "buying the AMA", it was a matter of Rockefeller interests building the AMA. The AMA didn't start out as something noble that was subverted by wealthy control freaks, it started as a grifter organization whose creator(s) quickly attached it to monied interests with the resources to take it to its logical conclusion.
The AMA pre-existed Rockefeller. Founded in 1847. My somewhat loose statement about Rockefeller "buying" the AMA arises with Flexner. https://mises.org/library/one-hundred-years-medical-fascism
The American Medical Association (AMA) had already been formed in 1847 by Nathan Smith Davis. Davis had been working at the Medical Society of New York with issues of licensing and education. While the pretense was always more rigorous standards toward the supposed end of effective treatments, exclusion was the reality. Hence it was no surprise that in 1870, Davis worked successfully to prohibit female and black physicians from becoming members of the AMA.
The AMA formed its Council on Medical Education in 1904 as a tool to artificially restrict education.11 However, the AMA's conflict of interest was too obvious. This is where Abraham Flexner and the Carnegie Foundation entered the picture. Flexner's older brother Simon was the director of the Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research and he recommended his brother Abraham for the Carnegie job. Abraham's acceptance of the role was the perfect special-interest symbiosis. Carnegie's desire was to advance secularism through higher education, thus it saw the AMA's agenda as favorable toward that end. Rockefeller's benefactors were allied with allopathic drug companies and hated for-profit schools that couldn't be controlled by the big-business, state-influenced foundations. Last of all, the AMA got an objective-appearing front in Carnegie.12
Not only was Abraham Flexner not even an allopathic physician; he was not a widely known authority on education,13 never mind medical education, as he had never even seen the inside of a medical school before joining Carnegie. His report was already effectively written, since it was essentially the AMA's unpublished 1906 report on US medical schools. Furthermore, Flexner was accompanied on his inspection by the AMA's N.P. Colwell to insure the inspection would arrive at the preordained conclusions. Flexner then spent time at the AMA's Chicago headquarters preparing what portion of the final product was his actual work.14
Yes, that's pretty much how I understand the history as well. The AMA was never a noble organization that became corrupted by money, it was a grift from the beginning that really only spread in influence once wealthy hobbyists began to fund it for their own purposes.
Thank you for sharing Tranströmer’s poetry. “Don’t be ashamed of being human…” says it all. If all beings were to actually grasp and feel what is happening in our world right now there would be a lot of weepin’ an’ wailing. I can feel the losses especially the ones that are about to come. To not run away from this feeling I root myself as deep as my feet are willing. For me it takes an ever vigilant, gentle kind of focus to notice that accusation is the undigestible stone I swallow from time to time to keep sorrow from rising. As I was reading this post it dawned on me that perhaps accusation is the comfort food for a people who turn their backs on grief. Accusation is the false savior riding in on his high horse, like a lame lawyer presenting the jury with a complaint, a measly charge of wrong doing, a lifeless dictum, a flabby piece of paper, a carefully crafted document devoid of meaning, devoid of honor, devoid of love. And yet here I am accusing accusation, ruffling my own feathers, heaving up the heavy stone, reaching inside my ancestral closet, insisting that out of darkness beauty sprouts, out of the shadows love wants to rise, to flow, to erupt in a river of tears. I call upon the “kind” in mankind and womankind. To witness is an act of “kind”. Our kind is in need of a witness. To witness is kind. To grieve is kind, to gaze upon the unkind is kind, to express is kind, to know who we are is kind, to open our mouth and sing out loud is kind, to open our mouth and sing softly is kind, to open our anything is kind. And how timely to share Marshall Rosenberg’s heart opening work. He was a master at holding and teaching how to hold a potent witness space, a dignified kindness, how to hear and recognize the feelings and unmet needs parading as accusations directed to others or at ourselves. I studied with Marshall back in 2000. I loved watching the video again. Thanks Celia for another enlivening post and thank you to all who are part of this community!
Thank you Celia. Indeed it is a time of reflection and activation. COVID being a kind of Bolshevik revolution is not only thought provoking but incredibly worrying as we digest the depth to which this revolution for our bodies, our minds and children has progressed. It is our most highly educated who are the drivers at least those in positions of careerist materialist influence to bring Steiner into the conversation.
What do we do? I am i. NYC and am seeing my entire family, friend and professional network dissolve under the spell of being part of the elite highly educated professional class. Devastating as I have come to use the word cowards as the only way to reconcile the behavior. I feel lost. How can such intelligent people be so devoid of critical thought. Ahrimanic spiritual influence, perhaps. I feel that so many of us are faced with this confounding and disorienting state. What do we do next?
Being a life long sailor I appreciate the wisdom of the saying. There are many ways to reach your destination, which may also include trimming sails and making course corrections to avoid foul weather :)
Situations like this always make me think of Melville's magnificent chapter 'Fast Fish and Loose Fish' in Moby Dick: https://etc.usf.edu/lit2go/42/moby-dick/770/chapter-89-fast-fish-and-loose-fish/
With its last line: "And what are you, reader, but a Loose-Fish and a Fast-Fish, too?"
We are none of us entirely free, nor entirely pure.
Celia:
I haven't watched this yet, but just a heads up that the (Reiner Fuellmich) 'Grand Jury | Day 1" has ended for the day; and the replay is available on Odysee and Rumble.
Here's an Odysee link:
https://odysee.com/@Corona-Investigative-Committee:5/Grand-Jury-1-EN-online:2
Dearest Edmond, Thank you!!
Before viewing the "Grand Jury | Day 1" attorney statements, it's very informative to first watch the following conversation where Fuellmich explains how these model Grand Jury proceedings will set the stage for real prosecutions intended to completely dismantle the individuals and corporations responsible for this plandemic:
January 26, 2022
Reiner Fuellmich: How a Grand Jury Will Prosecute Covid Crimes
https://odysee.com/@WorldCouncilForHealth:3/reiner-fuellmich-grand-jury-proceeding:8
It's been in the back of the mind to find out when this Grand Jury would start. Today, Day 1! Can't wait to watch. Thank you so much for posting it.
Sending hugs to you for your level-headed peacemaking efforts, Celia, and loving head scrunches to precious Lewis and Jack! 😻🤗😻
Very beautiful words in this post.
To disagree does not carry with it inherent hostility. It is simply negation of a proposition. Accusation is inherently hostile.
As a math teacher, I’ve noticed for years, students having a personal attachment to being right and students being hurt and offended when they were shown to have made an error. As the years have passed, and some of those students became teachers, the same ego attachment to correctness now exists among the educators. Math is the closest thing humans have to objectivity, and even that pursuit has now been tainted by ego attachment to correctness.
The only hope as I see it is for each of us who want others to detach from accusation (a nice word for this), is for us first to detach from it ourselves. Too many of us think that others are the problem (an accusation). Case in point: how often do we think we’re the only ones who know how to drive? Until we can recognize our own contributions to the messes around us, accusations will dominate us, and therefore hostility will dominate us.
So, maybe "No, no, that's incorrect" v "you're wrong?"
God bless my math teacher, Ms McDermott.
I can probably do that, too.