Great points, Celia. What ARE we looking at? Well, I knew it was a false flag from the get-go. Not bragging - listened to Pompeo who said it on live TV! In March 2020 or thereabouts, he stood next to Trump and said, "We're in a live exercise." ANd Trump responded under his breath, "you should have told us that." Look up what a 'live exercise' is in military/agency terms. I also early on made the connection of so-called mass formation to MKUltra mind control. I had studied it for years because of so many false flags committed by or in part by people who were discovered to have been subjects of the MKUltra mind control experiments. The tactics used were used this time starting in 2020, on the entire population of the western world. Those of us who recognized the tactics were not duped. And that is millions of us. For whatever reason, we were clear-minded enough to recognize the touchless torture tactics, the gaslighting, the Orwellian double-think and double-speak, the squeeze and release technique, the military terminology, etc. etc. etc.
It was never about our health. I don't know if covid19 is a bioweapon but it's quite apparent that the 'vaccine' is.
Yes, I remember that moment, now that you say it. Things could not be stranger, or more shocking. "Touchless torture tactics." That's exactly what it feels like. How are we still functioning? Well, we are!
The sad part is, people now think of that as normal. Kinda like an abused spouse gets used to their abuse. And then we don't know how much that has damaged us over the course of 2 years. Anxiety is horrible for health (as you know).
In a way, that's kind of how I've known this to be a scam from the get go. While this is God's creation, He certainly did not accidentally, mistakenly, or even purposefully do anything that resulted in these governments making these decisions about something *they* created.
Neither did the virus itself -- again a part of God's creation -- do this. It is incapable of making decisions, drafting mandates, constructing camps, or using police powers to enforce tyranny.
Humans and not just any humans, did this on their own volition. Clearly those humans that have elected to enhance viruses to make them more deadly, and that are unconcerned about the misery they're inflicting, are not doing this out of love. Except perhaps love of power and money.
In any case, these actions are not taken on behalf of God but are clearly something that serves the purpose of that which exists on the "other side" of the spectrum.
Any story that includes the premise that there is an actual virus causing people to die is just more of the same lie. What was produced to launch this pandemic scam is the idea of a killer plague virus, not a real pathogen.
DARPA, being a government "defense" operation, deals in deception as well as in actual warmaking developments. Looking at this latest Project Veritas release, there doesn't seem to me to be any "there" there.
Where do you draw the line? Anyone who includes the premise of an actual pathogen?
The fear of contagion pre existed any medical theory as a mixture of fear of demonic or malign influences or curses and fear of Divine Retribution - that latter going back to terrors of Antiquity largely masked over by rational thinking that still embodies its archetypes.
I share your unwillingness to invest in the covid narrative but I also see that captured opposition is different to double agent as control opposition.
The more invested in an established order, the less willing to question its predicates - and so such a one will do their utmost to reset normality rather than recognise a call to align in integrity.
So there are many invested in virus and vax who are appalled at the more obvious weaponisation of a flu d'etat couched as political farce majeure running stark anti-human agenda led by psychological warfare and funded by a capture of the global economy - for without the banks it would be starved of support in short order.
I agree with your conclusion but every time these buttons are pushed the alrams are all triggered and people who THINK they don't believe in Sars Cov2 or virology™ have doubt reopened to reveal they have yet to integrate an understanding of life rather and an anti-identity to particular narratives.
I draw the line at promotion of the vaccines or pharmaceutical drugs such as remdesevir. I know that there are lots of people who are well meaning but have fallen for the hoax. Malone promotes the vaccines and the pharmaceutical protocols pushed by the Gates Foundation.
Others such as Berenson and Kirsch are just annoying with their misdirection. They might be well-meaning, but they aren't helping at all. Kirsch likes to brag that he is offering millions of dollars for a debate, and at the same time, he's urging his readers to donate so that he can carry out his latest schemes.
I really don't have time for those people, regardless of their motives.
But is our creative extension of the Creator's Gift where a split mind is both generated and projected or cast out as IF to separate from God while projecting our thinking errors onto an externalised sense of creation with a separated, distanced and masked Creator - in our own image?
The virus is 'made' in the image of a mind hijack - buyer beware!
Those possessed by the false cannot rest in true and so are driven to seek it where it is not - ie in a world of possession and control set in fear and lack.
I hope I have been very clear from the outset that this has nothing to do with the Creator and everything to do with the Destroyer. It's an attack on God, the likes of which can elude people because it is so extreme in its attack-reach.
Probably only those who recognize it as evil would rely on their faith. or return to faith if they had lost that connection. Those who didn't see that this was a deception being done in service to evil just reacted with fear and hoped to be saved by the very people promoting the deception.
I only responded to Frank's quote above. I have no sense of your holding or propagating such a view!
Attack on God can only be the lie and the father of it, for what in truth can stand anywhere to even think such? Attack on awareness of truth is the result of protecting invested self-illusion. At some level our attachments to form encounter the transience of ever changing expression as pain of loss and therefore destructive to our sense of self and life, but here is where those who truly mourn shall be comforted, while those who become identified in lost or broken or betrayed love become embittered. This to gently show that hate can find a place in our heart if we are not reconciled truly in God, and yet be hard to bring to healing because our mind seeks to stamp it out or repackage it as 'normal'.
Attack is thus masked as defence or just vengeance in the name of God (or caring). Uncovering hate in our own heart can then be deeply shocking to a sense of self and world. But here is where healing needs replace self-judgement and the reset of deeper guilt as sacrifice of true participance in our lives.
Good find, Celia. I think it proves what we all knew from the start of the whole charade, that the VACCINE is the cause of illness, where faking a “virus” – in that document, they’re admitting, as you say, that the two are effectively the same thing – is/was first necessary to get to the “final solution” we’ve been witnessing since December 2020, when the vaccines were first rolled out. Crisis-reaction-solution (thesis-antithesis-synthesis), the classic Hegelian-dialectic playbook of these “people,” but the crisis is almost always manufactured. Fake a virus. Have everyone freak out and act like complete fools (wearing masks inside and out, 24/7). Demand and receive vaccines. Game over.
Nature - the extracted and 'purified' but no isolated matters presumed to contain pathogenic virus are added to a PREPARED* cell culture. Cytopathic effect is presumed proof of 'infection'. The culture is then used as the basis for traditional vaccines and sold as such after passaging through animals etc. See Janine Roberts "Fear of the Invisible" for a reasoned readable thorough search for understanding that is also willing to self-question - ie not just a confirmation bias.
Enders and recently Lanka both observe that a control without the addition of 'presumed virus' had the same cytopathic effect.
Gene tech enables disregard of empirical isolation by using software to model Humpty Dumpty from the millions of short code fragments 'found from samples' of indeterminate matters (as above) so as to fit the virus to the development of injected proteins™ (David Martin's patent document trail relates).
Dark tech or research under National Security runs different levels of clearnace on a need to know basis. How many working the Manhattan Project knew what the 'Gimmick was' ?
Secrets and lies are the very nature of such projects and become protected by layers of defences just as any other lies accepted as a basis from which to build order upon.
*Prepared cell culture is starved of nutrients and poisoned with anti biotics before adding presumed virus matters (that are purified to nano sized fragments - not to characterised isolated and quantified objects that can then be repeatedly identified in sick people viz Koch's logic!
David Martin on vaccine and virus being created simultaneously - https://www.bitchute.com/video/AkNgSbkEWRKL/ - if you know the genome sequence, an mRNA vax is trivially easy to make, they just aimed at the most mutable target, the S1 subunit of the spike protein, thus guaranteeing the need for a long chain of boosters. The trouble with the "boosters" being given out - shots 1 to 4 - is that they are targeted for the original wild type virus and alpha and beta variants, which means they will have little if any effectiveness against later variants with more mutations, such as omicron. And they will expose recipients to chronic levels of cytotoxic spike protein in blood plasma, which will increase resultant pathologies downstream - including oncogenesis. The result is an increased rate of death in the vaccinated population, spread enough apart in time to make it very difficult to tie the deaths back to the spike proteins from the vaccine - if autopsies are even done. What this is beginning to look like is a depopulation/population control program, as has been advocated by the Club of Rome in its studies on Limits to Growth.
Remember though that Martin is making the assumption, and expecting that you’re making the same, that there's actually a virus. Notice what he says: “the boosters...are targeted for the original wild type virus and alpha and beta variants, which means they will have little if any effectiveness against later variants with more mutations, such as omicron.” This a classic technique of controlled opposition. He’s just washed over the entire question of whether the original virus even exists, including using fear-based adjectives to scare you, calling it a “wild type” virus (it’s “wild” – i.e., it’s loose and free and crazy!). He has just committed (knowingly) a begging-the-question fallacy and he’s getting you to appeal to his “authority” (another fallacy) as an “expert” whom you think is on your side and whom you therefore won’t question. He gets you to accept the basic premise of the existence of a virus, while stating that the current vaccines are “ineffective” in dealing with future variants (a truth within a lie). Accordingly, he can then offer his OWN solutions to this new problem of “bad” vaccines: the “safe” versions that he and others (e.g. Dr. Robert Malone) offer. Watch out for guys like Martin. They are false prophets.
I would like to begin by saying that "virus" is a word, first, that has "mutated," you might say, into a spell. Lanka, Kaufman, Cowan et al approach "virus" like it only means a real, pure, un-mediated biological entity. The spell doesn't require that.
In this discussion, the IT, is more of a constructed package, a reptile-made something or other, that dwells partly in silico, partly in people's minds--that has all kinds of things going on in and around 'it.'
Shall we call it 'Frank,' short for 'Frankenstein?' Or 'Erl,' short for 'Erlkonig?' (Goethe's possibly imaginary monster.)
Do I 'believe' there are 'viruses?' I think the best evidence suggests that "viruses" are as perfectly misunderstood as almost everything and everybody else around here.
Arby, I am no longer sure I should EVER use double quotation marks, unless to indicate direct quotes.
I have experienced cognitive changes in the landscape of my mind 'since Covid,' that are very hard to talk about. Primarily, loss of continuity. I can't easily go back and retrieve a thought, memory, or (worst of all) impulse/intention. I think this is connected to shock.
Yes the idea 'virus' mutates as variants of assigned meanings that jump or shift from poisons to germs to genetics to 'man-made surveillance and control systems'?
Shock or trauma is the condition for a split mind or a house divided against its Self.
The 'foundations of the ego' or self imaged, are FoG (function of God reversed) cast within mysteries of complication or impenetrable complexity guarded by 'priesthoods of mythic narrative controls or expert opinion by which to keep the trauma masked and mitigated but unaddressed and unhealed and active regardless a cast out of mind set to temporary security as perpetual threat.
the 'Terrain' of psychic-emotional compartmentalisation is off the radar for those who worship the mask that thinks them. But that doesn't mean separation from our being, only a breakdown of communication within our awareness of being as a result of trauma.
The use of mind as a weapon distorts functional service to an embracing awareness, and the abilities we grew to 'survive' it are released to realign the Spirit. In simple, this means I cant do it by myself and am obliged to remember and align in extension of relationship and connection to do or be what is given me to share in. If I don't disinhibit love, I no longer have the means to inhibit fear and hate - which either expresses as a mess or blocks up to paralysis or stutters twixt the two!
To abide with, simply and presently is to release the mind that manages everything from a point of definitions, predictions and controls.
Is this not the Crossover?
Regardless the form or situations it takes, we are led out of captivity at a level we could not have conceived because we were no longer willing or able to choose to persist in a lie - regardless whether we could articulate or justify to ourself or another.
The release of shock is the full embrace of presence in place of its triggers. Willingness grows with practice. Practical tensions and stresses are part of growth and function - debilitating strain is not.
One "IT" candidate, humbly offered: Leviathan... "king over all the sons of pride"(Job 41:34). In the Septuagint, he is referred-to as the dragon/serpent--the same created being whose head Christ crushed at the cross and whom He consigns to hell in Rev 20:2... until dragon/serpent is released "for a little while" (Rev 20:3c).
Totally hear ya' on the PTSD-like cognitive aspects. Antidote: Colossians 3:1-3.
There's definitely a genetic definition based on the genetic definition for SARS. If you are bothered you can read exactly how the 'in silic' virus is arrived at.
Wishes, fallacies and lies hijack the minds of everyone at one level or another. The phrase 'blind them with science' doesn't refer to brilliance.
The people least able to see the deception are the most 'trained' - go figure.
Anyone operating from presumption that a physical virus has been empirically isolated, and characterised is already downstream to the switcheroo game.
Then the actual evidence for causation of a specific disease is 1 - not there and 2 the so called disease is a catch-all term for any and many kinds of already named diseases such as colds and flu, but even more ingenious is its asymptomatic disease - ergo everyone is made a biosecurity hazard - for as we are all told, these 'variants' turned out to be mild but the NEXT one could wipe out Billions!!!
Other naming magic is an insider redefinition of 'pandemic' - the use of PCR replication as 'tests', their arbitrarily arrived results as 'cases', many toxic and often fatal 'treatments'. But you've been here all along and nothing is really hidden. The corruption of science is big enough to Geobel up the weak-minded.
There's another angle though. Most WANT to be hijacked - that is they find meaning and a sense of self reinforcement in 'the devil they know' amidst an otherwise profound sense of disturbance around induced terror.
There definitely is a belief in a virus - and it is a securitised narrative at the core of a global medical monopoly.
No one has actually found this in the sick people who are supposed to be full of it - nor will they even look.
Its very hard for scientists to tell the difference between good and bad science - especially when funding, reputation and career are jeopardised by challenging vested interests.
I don't find he makes that assumption, I am vigilant against such insinuation - which Malone is heavily invested in. Likewise I have seen him question the veracity of gene dogma but that doesn't mean he cant use the language of the natives in resolving other facets of a multifaceted dispute.
Nor am I invested in siding with or against persons but discerning the witness to the facts.
So while I find your post a reversal of the fact as I appreciate it, I only watch out for anyone who says 'watch out for 'targeted individual'.
If you recognise Malone as 'on your side' then that is your current choice.
The nature of fear is to divide and conflict under pretext of hyped or nurtured problem to generate the conditions in which Good Cop steps in to save you (sic).
Such is the complex of deceit in the world that anyone may be tempted by it to believe they are right, righteous and saved - but if that depends upon the smear and target of sin to others - their own blind spot is active, unwitting - as them that know what they do.
You can argue the issue but must attack the person?
What do you say to the document trail of patents on public record that support his claim?
Pointing out that someone is engaging deception isn't "attacking the person". If you make that the standard, then you're questioning your own power of discernment. If I say that Malone is engaging in obvious tactics of deception or that his presentation amounts to a bait and switch, I haven't called him a lying piece of shit. What I have done is to make an observation about his presentation.
Disagreement isn't an attack, except to someone hoping to sustain an illusion.
Yep, I don't even think Malone knows what he thinks. He's such a narcissist that I bet he thinks that he thinks for himself.... That's why everything he has said before didn't make sense, like saying the shots are ok for third trimester women, without any fking data? Oh and for long covid, he took the vaccine. Wait, since when was a vaccine good for an already infected person, isn't he a vaccinologist? Either he's stupid or full of crap... who knows.
And HI BINRA! i remember you from sott. I left that dump a while ago, they have their own deep ASSumptions
Whether Malone is acting for the reasons you say, or a trained operative for his role - it is also worth acknowledging we are all 'selfish' or identified in roles or opportunities that at some level act out scripts that will have personal meanings relative to our personal history.
However There is still a signal to noise ratio.
David Martin could be an 'Ironside' bringing the case for the prosecution with both analytical skill and dramatic presentation BUT regardless, that isn't blocking a congruent witness to criminal claims and fraudulent actions.
Covid drew a line immediately as with 911. We saw many apparently critical voices disappear.
SOTT seemed infantile the last few times I looked. But in another way, so do many who think 'waking up' is feeding an addiction to must share drama - fed by a constant reiteration of fear driven reaction. So in a sense I am witnessing a kind of erasure of consciousness.
We are in a Moment of Choice at a deeper level than our attempts to think it all out. Hence the practical 'spirituality' called forth as our fundamental Resource - however we may articulate that or hold it as intuitive sense unsaid.
Martin is certainly correct in revealing the patent history on Covid virus sequencing (i.e., filed/granted well before the pandemic began). I’m not questioning that he properly identifies the clear criminality and deceit behind the “virus” as a man-made patented “bioweapon.” And perhaps I misinterpreted the Martin quote provided by “streamfortyseven” above. But Martin, and this is just plain fact as the cited document below clearly shows, is as heavily invested in the “lie” of the virus as any other wealthy entrepreneur and offers “dubious” (to put it mildly) alternative solutions that ultimately aren’t much different than what we’re lovingly being treated to now. Not sure that's an "attack" per se but simply a general observation based on well-documented evidence: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1tQoYi1Y6-HcZ8G1tPKcXOymVN6e7oXH91Bc0ewPljOU/edit#
I'm not interested in defending or 'cancelling' persons, but in witnessing relevant to the issues as I feel and recognise them - within a world of many-levelled views.
I could say that most seem to be stakeholders in the narrative by taking identity from its framing, rather than bringing that framing to awareness. So if anyone is associated with the establishment they are metaphorically guillotined? (Perhaps exaggerated to make a point).
I appreciate that we need bring discernment to everything, but I also suggest that the healing and information we need is 'hidden' in those areas we judge against.
Or at least - that associating in witnessing for humanity opens unexpected relationship across every kind of social divide.
I still hold I have heard Martin speak of lack of evidence for SARScov 2 as I have of genetics as weaponised 'atheism'. I'm not anyone's judge.
I appreciate your connection. My appreciation for truth is not a war of sides, but siding with freedom is at least open to uncovering truth!
yes. I generally don't persist in exposure to propagation of deceits or MSM and political programming. But the title is to the point. I see some get this immediately and some catch up, others ... not yet
Yet sticking with the established framework has its usefulness, so I can understand Martin´s take. It may provide leverage against the falsehoods of the official narrative (fighting fire with fire). Admittedly, there is no SARS-CoV-2, and there is no causal link between it and the disease mislabeled as Covid-19. But there is something there, as Dr. Tenpenny once said.
My desire is that waking to lies - recognises this as opportunity to put lies behind them in direct and immediate curiosity for what is true (something going on). Instead blame resets the ego as a a fight against lies - as if truth waits on proving the lie.
False claim do need to be refuted and called to account, but by true witness.
So instead of investing in claiming no virus, that can be then attacked or undermined in being set hoops to prove itself, abide lawfully in seeking proof of claim. This is also happening.
'Something there' occurred as clusters given extraordinary media focus. When a 'virus' is no longer the guilty agent to which all funds and attention are directed, real questions can be asked... and answered. Bit of course the name assigned covid-19 is a catch-all for anything and everything, so all the words we use need to be considered as to what we actually mean. Most of what triggers and maintains the Lie give power is 'word-magic' supported by symbols and props, and of course the immense leveraging of resources, which characteristically don't primarily come from Billionaires but from the 'tax-slave' or indentured inheritance of toxic debt.
There are many routes for a sickness looking from many angles, including a recognition of a healing or clearing process as mistakenly feared and actively blocked.
Here is the PV page -- with their press release, video report expose, and, at the very bottom of it, the links to four Federal Government/DoD/DARPA documents
Very early on in the `crisis´, Dr Luc Montegneir (I probably misspelled his name) the Nobel prize winner for discovering the HIV virus, was on French TV, live. He and his team of experts had analyzed the whole genome. He said, it was definitely altered in a lab, and it looks like they were trying to make a vaccine. He said there were bits of HIV and other things that were not naturally evolved. The TV guys got sooo alarmed. They ended the show abruptly, and I never saw him on TV again.
He states very clearly in his original paper that they never isolated HIV.
The genomic analysis phase came later after persistent failures to find it, led to a means to no longer need to look. The whole genome has never been found but as a postulated entity is reconstructed from specific arbitrary selections among many millions of short code pieces of indeterminate origin.
The analysis of such a composite lab computer artefact is not where to start! Let him analyse the s-proteins supposedly derived from the model for this is where Martin's work reveals the GoF has focused in as regards patent trails going back years!
Gallo stole and misrepresented Montagnier's work and published his fraud direct to MSM bypassing even peer review. HIV has no more direct evidence than Sars - biomarkers are used to fit life to the pathological model, hence the replacement of doctors with technicians with screen robots and apps.
But you are right that the issue is so charged that anyone in Media or Establishment is terrified of attracting penalty, and yet once a sense of permission is felt, the GoF research stuff is prompted or leaked for promotion. Its all timing in terms of social/human restructuring. All human intention has unintended consequences, so we can hope that evils serve a greater good regardless blind or inhuman agenda.
Yes, I think the whole field was barking up the wrong tree, and most viral research is based on false assumptions. Even Birx and Redmond were censured for misrepresenting the science around AIDS. They kept misrepresenting, and became the heads of their agencies!
The point I was trying to make here is that They were trying to make a vaccine. The interesting language in the Veritas docs recently published supports this.
I'd seen Shankara Chetty with Fuelmich and looked for a separated out vid - thx.
The hypersensitivity/allergy theory for the 'weird complication is established imo but I remain sceptical as to s-protein being a virus - but it could be in vaccines prior to covax .
Hamer's GNM theory on allergy is of direct or indirect association with a biological shock such as to then retrigger the conflict and reaction on subsequent exposures.
The veritas doc indicates that the presumed viral soup is the vaccine resource Which is also shown by revisiting cytopathic test cultures with a control that introduced no 'viral matters' and still produced 'cytopathic effect'.
It states a few things that if it was in fact verified would help - but regardless of truth would damage if revealed a fake release that had been given weight...
It probably has something to do with Michael Callahan. This article from July 31, 2020 explains it:
Whitney Webb: DARPA’s Man in Wuhan
Michael Callahan’s career began in USAID and in the bioweapons labs of the former Soviet Union, advancing the agenda of the global bioweapons and pharmaceutical cartels. He would take what he learned there to execute a massive expansion of DARPA’s biodefense portfolio and today finds himself squarely in the center of the origins of the coronavirus pandemic.
Two programs in particular developed by Callahan while at DARPA would later play a critical role in his future involvement in the broader story of the SARS-CoV-2, a.k.a. COVID-19 and the vilification of China, IP and the advancement of a global vaccine regime.
The Accelerated Manufacture of Pharmaceuticals (AMP) program was created by Michael Callahan in 2006, barely a year after he first came on board as DARPA’s portfolio manager. Its purpose was to find technologies that could “radically accelerate the manufacturing of protein vaccines and protein-based therapeutics”, with the goal of “revolutionizing protein therapeutics and vaccine manufacture” through the private sector.
The program’s mandate dovetailed with concurrent efforts to fundamentally transform the U.S. government’s approach to vaccine manufacture and (Medical Countermeasures) MCMs.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iXsE78wPlKg
Great points, Celia. What ARE we looking at? Well, I knew it was a false flag from the get-go. Not bragging - listened to Pompeo who said it on live TV! In March 2020 or thereabouts, he stood next to Trump and said, "We're in a live exercise." ANd Trump responded under his breath, "you should have told us that." Look up what a 'live exercise' is in military/agency terms. I also early on made the connection of so-called mass formation to MKUltra mind control. I had studied it for years because of so many false flags committed by or in part by people who were discovered to have been subjects of the MKUltra mind control experiments. The tactics used were used this time starting in 2020, on the entire population of the western world. Those of us who recognized the tactics were not duped. And that is millions of us. For whatever reason, we were clear-minded enough to recognize the touchless torture tactics, the gaslighting, the Orwellian double-think and double-speak, the squeeze and release technique, the military terminology, etc. etc. etc.
It was never about our health. I don't know if covid19 is a bioweapon but it's quite apparent that the 'vaccine' is.
Yes, I remember that moment, now that you say it. Things could not be stranger, or more shocking. "Touchless torture tactics." That's exactly what it feels like. How are we still functioning? Well, we are!
Biderman´s Chart of Coercion (ca 1956)
- Isolation
- Monopolisation of perception
- Induced debility and exhaustion
- Threats
- Occasional Indulgences
- Demonstrating omnipotence and omniscience
- Degradation
- Enforcing trivial demands
Yep. It's all in there.
The sad part is, people now think of that as normal. Kinda like an abused spouse gets used to their abuse. And then we don't know how much that has damaged us over the course of 2 years. Anxiety is horrible for health (as you know).
"Implicit in the narrative is that God did this."
In a way, that's kind of how I've known this to be a scam from the get go. While this is God's creation, He certainly did not accidentally, mistakenly, or even purposefully do anything that resulted in these governments making these decisions about something *they* created.
Neither did the virus itself -- again a part of God's creation -- do this. It is incapable of making decisions, drafting mandates, constructing camps, or using police powers to enforce tyranny.
Humans and not just any humans, did this on their own volition. Clearly those humans that have elected to enhance viruses to make them more deadly, and that are unconcerned about the misery they're inflicting, are not doing this out of love. Except perhaps love of power and money.
In any case, these actions are not taken on behalf of God but are clearly something that serves the purpose of that which exists on the "other side" of the spectrum.
Any story that includes the premise that there is an actual virus causing people to die is just more of the same lie. What was produced to launch this pandemic scam is the idea of a killer plague virus, not a real pathogen.
DARPA, being a government "defense" operation, deals in deception as well as in actual warmaking developments. Looking at this latest Project Veritas release, there doesn't seem to me to be any "there" there.
Where do you draw the line? Anyone who includes the premise of an actual pathogen?
The fear of contagion pre existed any medical theory as a mixture of fear of demonic or malign influences or curses and fear of Divine Retribution - that latter going back to terrors of Antiquity largely masked over by rational thinking that still embodies its archetypes.
I share your unwillingness to invest in the covid narrative but I also see that captured opposition is different to double agent as control opposition.
The more invested in an established order, the less willing to question its predicates - and so such a one will do their utmost to reset normality rather than recognise a call to align in integrity.
So there are many invested in virus and vax who are appalled at the more obvious weaponisation of a flu d'etat couched as political farce majeure running stark anti-human agenda led by psychological warfare and funded by a capture of the global economy - for without the banks it would be starved of support in short order.
I agree with your conclusion but every time these buttons are pushed the alrams are all triggered and people who THINK they don't believe in Sars Cov2 or virology™ have doubt reopened to reveal they have yet to integrate an understanding of life rather and an anti-identity to particular narratives.
I draw the line at promotion of the vaccines or pharmaceutical drugs such as remdesevir. I know that there are lots of people who are well meaning but have fallen for the hoax. Malone promotes the vaccines and the pharmaceutical protocols pushed by the Gates Foundation.
Others such as Berenson and Kirsch are just annoying with their misdirection. They might be well-meaning, but they aren't helping at all. Kirsch likes to brag that he is offering millions of dollars for a debate, and at the same time, he's urging his readers to donate so that he can carry out his latest schemes.
I really don't have time for those people, regardless of their motives.
God Created and sees that it is Very Good!
Resonant recognition.
You assign psychopathic attributes to Creation!
But is our creative extension of the Creator's Gift where a split mind is both generated and projected or cast out as IF to separate from God while projecting our thinking errors onto an externalised sense of creation with a separated, distanced and masked Creator - in our own image?
The virus is 'made' in the image of a mind hijack - buyer beware!
Those possessed by the false cannot rest in true and so are driven to seek it where it is not - ie in a world of possession and control set in fear and lack.
I hope I have been very clear from the outset that this has nothing to do with the Creator and everything to do with the Destroyer. It's an attack on God, the likes of which can elude people because it is so extreme in its attack-reach.
Best positive for me during all this madness has been a reconnection with our Heavenly Father.
Same for me. I wonder how many more were drawn back into the faith after being confronted with this evil.
Probably only those who recognize it as evil would rely on their faith. or return to faith if they had lost that connection. Those who didn't see that this was a deception being done in service to evil just reacted with fear and hoped to be saved by the very people promoting the deception.
If you're saying that this whole "covid19pandemic" meme is a deception from the father of lies, then I agree.
Absolutely.
I only responded to Frank's quote above. I have no sense of your holding or propagating such a view!
Attack on God can only be the lie and the father of it, for what in truth can stand anywhere to even think such? Attack on awareness of truth is the result of protecting invested self-illusion. At some level our attachments to form encounter the transience of ever changing expression as pain of loss and therefore destructive to our sense of self and life, but here is where those who truly mourn shall be comforted, while those who become identified in lost or broken or betrayed love become embittered. This to gently show that hate can find a place in our heart if we are not reconciled truly in God, and yet be hard to bring to healing because our mind seeks to stamp it out or repackage it as 'normal'.
Attack is thus masked as defence or just vengeance in the name of God (or caring). Uncovering hate in our own heart can then be deeply shocking to a sense of self and world. But here is where healing needs replace self-judgement and the reset of deeper guilt as sacrifice of true participance in our lives.
Good find, Celia. I think it proves what we all knew from the start of the whole charade, that the VACCINE is the cause of illness, where faking a “virus” – in that document, they’re admitting, as you say, that the two are effectively the same thing – is/was first necessary to get to the “final solution” we’ve been witnessing since December 2020, when the vaccines were first rolled out. Crisis-reaction-solution (thesis-antithesis-synthesis), the classic Hegelian-dialectic playbook of these “people,” but the crisis is almost always manufactured. Fake a virus. Have everyone freak out and act like complete fools (wearing masks inside and out, 24/7). Demand and receive vaccines. Game over.
Nature - the extracted and 'purified' but no isolated matters presumed to contain pathogenic virus are added to a PREPARED* cell culture. Cytopathic effect is presumed proof of 'infection'. The culture is then used as the basis for traditional vaccines and sold as such after passaging through animals etc. See Janine Roberts "Fear of the Invisible" for a reasoned readable thorough search for understanding that is also willing to self-question - ie not just a confirmation bias.
Enders and recently Lanka both observe that a control without the addition of 'presumed virus' had the same cytopathic effect.
Gene tech enables disregard of empirical isolation by using software to model Humpty Dumpty from the millions of short code fragments 'found from samples' of indeterminate matters (as above) so as to fit the virus to the development of injected proteins™ (David Martin's patent document trail relates).
Dark tech or research under National Security runs different levels of clearnace on a need to know basis. How many working the Manhattan Project knew what the 'Gimmick was' ?
Secrets and lies are the very nature of such projects and become protected by layers of defences just as any other lies accepted as a basis from which to build order upon.
I wrote on GoF v True Function today already:
https://willingness-to-listen.blogspot.com/2022/01/gof-or-acceptance-of-true-function.html
*Prepared cell culture is starved of nutrients and poisoned with anti biotics before adding presumed virus matters (that are purified to nano sized fragments - not to characterised isolated and quantified objects that can then be repeatedly identified in sick people viz Koch's logic!
David Martin on vaccine and virus being created simultaneously - https://www.bitchute.com/video/AkNgSbkEWRKL/ - if you know the genome sequence, an mRNA vax is trivially easy to make, they just aimed at the most mutable target, the S1 subunit of the spike protein, thus guaranteeing the need for a long chain of boosters. The trouble with the "boosters" being given out - shots 1 to 4 - is that they are targeted for the original wild type virus and alpha and beta variants, which means they will have little if any effectiveness against later variants with more mutations, such as omicron. And they will expose recipients to chronic levels of cytotoxic spike protein in blood plasma, which will increase resultant pathologies downstream - including oncogenesis. The result is an increased rate of death in the vaccinated population, spread enough apart in time to make it very difficult to tie the deaths back to the spike proteins from the vaccine - if autopsies are even done. What this is beginning to look like is a depopulation/population control program, as has been advocated by the Club of Rome in its studies on Limits to Growth.
Remember though that Martin is making the assumption, and expecting that you’re making the same, that there's actually a virus. Notice what he says: “the boosters...are targeted for the original wild type virus and alpha and beta variants, which means they will have little if any effectiveness against later variants with more mutations, such as omicron.” This a classic technique of controlled opposition. He’s just washed over the entire question of whether the original virus even exists, including using fear-based adjectives to scare you, calling it a “wild type” virus (it’s “wild” – i.e., it’s loose and free and crazy!). He has just committed (knowingly) a begging-the-question fallacy and he’s getting you to appeal to his “authority” (another fallacy) as an “expert” whom you think is on your side and whom you therefore won’t question. He gets you to accept the basic premise of the existence of a virus, while stating that the current vaccines are “ineffective” in dealing with future variants (a truth within a lie). Accordingly, he can then offer his OWN solutions to this new problem of “bad” vaccines: the “safe” versions that he and others (e.g. Dr. Robert Malone) offer. Watch out for guys like Martin. They are false prophets.
I would like to begin by saying that "virus" is a word, first, that has "mutated," you might say, into a spell. Lanka, Kaufman, Cowan et al approach "virus" like it only means a real, pure, un-mediated biological entity. The spell doesn't require that.
In this discussion, the IT, is more of a constructed package, a reptile-made something or other, that dwells partly in silico, partly in people's minds--that has all kinds of things going on in and around 'it.'
Shall we call it 'Frank,' short for 'Frankenstein?' Or 'Erl,' short for 'Erlkonig?' (Goethe's possibly imaginary monster.)
Do I 'believe' there are 'viruses?' I think the best evidence suggests that "viruses" are as perfectly misunderstood as almost everything and everybody else around here.
Arby, I am no longer sure I should EVER use double quotation marks, unless to indicate direct quotes.
I have experienced cognitive changes in the landscape of my mind 'since Covid,' that are very hard to talk about. Primarily, loss of continuity. I can't easily go back and retrieve a thought, memory, or (worst of all) impulse/intention. I think this is connected to shock.
I think we should talk more, about shock.
Yes the idea 'virus' mutates as variants of assigned meanings that jump or shift from poisons to germs to genetics to 'man-made surveillance and control systems'?
Shock or trauma is the condition for a split mind or a house divided against its Self.
The 'foundations of the ego' or self imaged, are FoG (function of God reversed) cast within mysteries of complication or impenetrable complexity guarded by 'priesthoods of mythic narrative controls or expert opinion by which to keep the trauma masked and mitigated but unaddressed and unhealed and active regardless a cast out of mind set to temporary security as perpetual threat.
the 'Terrain' of psychic-emotional compartmentalisation is off the radar for those who worship the mask that thinks them. But that doesn't mean separation from our being, only a breakdown of communication within our awareness of being as a result of trauma.
The use of mind as a weapon distorts functional service to an embracing awareness, and the abilities we grew to 'survive' it are released to realign the Spirit. In simple, this means I cant do it by myself and am obliged to remember and align in extension of relationship and connection to do or be what is given me to share in. If I don't disinhibit love, I no longer have the means to inhibit fear and hate - which either expresses as a mess or blocks up to paralysis or stutters twixt the two!
To abide with, simply and presently is to release the mind that manages everything from a point of definitions, predictions and controls.
Is this not the Crossover?
Regardless the form or situations it takes, we are led out of captivity at a level we could not have conceived because we were no longer willing or able to choose to persist in a lie - regardless whether we could articulate or justify to ourself or another.
The release of shock is the full embrace of presence in place of its triggers. Willingness grows with practice. Practical tensions and stresses are part of growth and function - debilitating strain is not.
One "IT" candidate, humbly offered: Leviathan... "king over all the sons of pride"(Job 41:34). In the Septuagint, he is referred-to as the dragon/serpent--the same created being whose head Christ crushed at the cross and whom He consigns to hell in Rev 20:2... until dragon/serpent is released "for a little while" (Rev 20:3c).
Totally hear ya' on the PTSD-like cognitive aspects. Antidote: Colossians 3:1-3.
There's definitely a virus, there's a reason it's called SARS-CoV-*2* - because it's 30 genome pairs different from SARS-CoV-1. See https://nerdhaspower.weebly.com/blog/scientific-evidence-and-logic-behind-the-claim-that-the-wuhan-coronavirus-is-man-made. And nearly 7 million variants have been isolated and sequenced, see https://www.gisaid.org/ The way that SARS-CoV-2 produces pathogenic changes in the human body is via the ACE-2 receptor, see https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-02039-y Making "vaccines" which hijack cells to produce lots and lots of this spike protein is kind of insane, if you think about it. And this is all pretty tough sailing for the very great majority of people - my PhD in physical/organic chemistry has been very useful. Kary Mullis says that it's very hard for non-scientists to tell the difference between good and bad science, and think he's right: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5aISPlTLbJo
There's definitely a genetic definition based on the genetic definition for SARS. If you are bothered you can read exactly how the 'in silic' virus is arrived at.
Wishes, fallacies and lies hijack the minds of everyone at one level or another. The phrase 'blind them with science' doesn't refer to brilliance.
The people least able to see the deception are the most 'trained' - go figure.
Anyone operating from presumption that a physical virus has been empirically isolated, and characterised is already downstream to the switcheroo game.
Then the actual evidence for causation of a specific disease is 1 - not there and 2 the so called disease is a catch-all term for any and many kinds of already named diseases such as colds and flu, but even more ingenious is its asymptomatic disease - ergo everyone is made a biosecurity hazard - for as we are all told, these 'variants' turned out to be mild but the NEXT one could wipe out Billions!!!
Other naming magic is an insider redefinition of 'pandemic' - the use of PCR replication as 'tests', their arbitrarily arrived results as 'cases', many toxic and often fatal 'treatments'. But you've been here all along and nothing is really hidden. The corruption of science is big enough to Geobel up the weak-minded.
There's another angle though. Most WANT to be hijacked - that is they find meaning and a sense of self reinforcement in 'the devil they know' amidst an otherwise profound sense of disturbance around induced terror.
There definitely is a belief in a virus - and it is a securitised narrative at the core of a global medical monopoly.
No one has actually found this in the sick people who are supposed to be full of it - nor will they even look.
Its very hard for scientists to tell the difference between good and bad science - especially when funding, reputation and career are jeopardised by challenging vested interests.
Yes, SARS-CoV-2 has been found at autopsy, in numerous organs including lungs and kidneys, and photographs exist.
You reveal your intentions in making claims without substance.
I don't find he makes that assumption, I am vigilant against such insinuation - which Malone is heavily invested in. Likewise I have seen him question the veracity of gene dogma but that doesn't mean he cant use the language of the natives in resolving other facets of a multifaceted dispute.
Nor am I invested in siding with or against persons but discerning the witness to the facts.
So while I find your post a reversal of the fact as I appreciate it, I only watch out for anyone who says 'watch out for 'targeted individual'.
If you recognise Malone as 'on your side' then that is your current choice.
The nature of fear is to divide and conflict under pretext of hyped or nurtured problem to generate the conditions in which Good Cop steps in to save you (sic).
Such is the complex of deceit in the world that anyone may be tempted by it to believe they are right, righteous and saved - but if that depends upon the smear and target of sin to others - their own blind spot is active, unwitting - as them that know what they do.
You can argue the issue but must attack the person?
What do you say to the document trail of patents on public record that support his claim?
Pointing out that someone is engaging deception isn't "attacking the person". If you make that the standard, then you're questioning your own power of discernment. If I say that Malone is engaging in obvious tactics of deception or that his presentation amounts to a bait and switch, I haven't called him a lying piece of shit. What I have done is to make an observation about his presentation.
Disagreement isn't an attack, except to someone hoping to sustain an illusion.
Well said.
Yep, I don't even think Malone knows what he thinks. He's such a narcissist that I bet he thinks that he thinks for himself.... That's why everything he has said before didn't make sense, like saying the shots are ok for third trimester women, without any fking data? Oh and for long covid, he took the vaccine. Wait, since when was a vaccine good for an already infected person, isn't he a vaccinologist? Either he's stupid or full of crap... who knows.
And HI BINRA! i remember you from sott. I left that dump a while ago, they have their own deep ASSumptions
Whether Malone is acting for the reasons you say, or a trained operative for his role - it is also worth acknowledging we are all 'selfish' or identified in roles or opportunities that at some level act out scripts that will have personal meanings relative to our personal history.
However There is still a signal to noise ratio.
David Martin could be an 'Ironside' bringing the case for the prosecution with both analytical skill and dramatic presentation BUT regardless, that isn't blocking a congruent witness to criminal claims and fraudulent actions.
Covid drew a line immediately as with 911. We saw many apparently critical voices disappear.
SOTT seemed infantile the last few times I looked. But in another way, so do many who think 'waking up' is feeding an addiction to must share drama - fed by a constant reiteration of fear driven reaction. So in a sense I am witnessing a kind of erasure of consciousness.
We are in a Moment of Choice at a deeper level than our attempts to think it all out. Hence the practical 'spirituality' called forth as our fundamental Resource - however we may articulate that or hold it as intuitive sense unsaid.
Martin is certainly correct in revealing the patent history on Covid virus sequencing (i.e., filed/granted well before the pandemic began). I’m not questioning that he properly identifies the clear criminality and deceit behind the “virus” as a man-made patented “bioweapon.” And perhaps I misinterpreted the Martin quote provided by “streamfortyseven” above. But Martin, and this is just plain fact as the cited document below clearly shows, is as heavily invested in the “lie” of the virus as any other wealthy entrepreneur and offers “dubious” (to put it mildly) alternative solutions that ultimately aren’t much different than what we’re lovingly being treated to now. Not sure that's an "attack" per se but simply a general observation based on well-documented evidence: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1tQoYi1Y6-HcZ8G1tPKcXOymVN6e7oXH91Bc0ewPljOU/edit#
I'd seen that article before. It misses my focus.
I'm not interested in defending or 'cancelling' persons, but in witnessing relevant to the issues as I feel and recognise them - within a world of many-levelled views.
I could say that most seem to be stakeholders in the narrative by taking identity from its framing, rather than bringing that framing to awareness. So if anyone is associated with the establishment they are metaphorically guillotined? (Perhaps exaggerated to make a point).
I appreciate that we need bring discernment to everything, but I also suggest that the healing and information we need is 'hidden' in those areas we judge against.
Or at least - that associating in witnessing for humanity opens unexpected relationship across every kind of social divide.
I still hold I have heard Martin speak of lack of evidence for SARScov 2 as I have of genetics as weaponised 'atheism'. I'm not anyone's judge.
I appreciate your connection. My appreciation for truth is not a war of sides, but siding with freedom is at least open to uncovering truth!
I agree. Here's something I read last night:
https://www.unite4truth.com/post/mass-formation-psychosis-dr-malone-sells-who-test-treat-next-phase-covid-plan-under-hero-s-guise
yes. I generally don't persist in exposure to propagation of deceits or MSM and political programming. But the title is to the point. I see some get this immediately and some catch up, others ... not yet
Yet sticking with the established framework has its usefulness, so I can understand Martin´s take. It may provide leverage against the falsehoods of the official narrative (fighting fire with fire). Admittedly, there is no SARS-CoV-2, and there is no causal link between it and the disease mislabeled as Covid-19. But there is something there, as Dr. Tenpenny once said.
My desire is that waking to lies - recognises this as opportunity to put lies behind them in direct and immediate curiosity for what is true (something going on). Instead blame resets the ego as a a fight against lies - as if truth waits on proving the lie.
False claim do need to be refuted and called to account, but by true witness.
So instead of investing in claiming no virus, that can be then attacked or undermined in being set hoops to prove itself, abide lawfully in seeking proof of claim. This is also happening.
'Something there' occurred as clusters given extraordinary media focus. When a 'virus' is no longer the guilty agent to which all funds and attention are directed, real questions can be asked... and answered. Bit of course the name assigned covid-19 is a catch-all for anything and everything, so all the words we use need to be considered as to what we actually mean. Most of what triggers and maintains the Lie give power is 'word-magic' supported by symbols and props, and of course the immense leveraging of resources, which characteristically don't primarily come from Billionaires but from the 'tax-slave' or indentured inheritance of toxic debt.
There are many routes for a sickness looking from many angles, including a recognition of a healing or clearing process as mistakenly feared and actively blocked.
So is this where the drama ends? Can we all take off our masks now and leave the theatre?
The virus is the hacksxxxine
Once they shot folks with it, they got sick with the virus
So. Shooting Covidope makes one ill.
Not really news except the evidence...
Was hard not to infer this months ago I'd been writing the same
Here is the PV page -- with their press release, video report expose, and, at the very bottom of it, the links to four Federal Government/DoD/DARPA documents
https://www.projectveritas.com/news/military-documents-about-gain-of-function-contradict-fauci-testimony-under/
So just another American False Flag™ brought to us by the wonderful folk who gave us The Gulf of Tonkin. Surprise, surprise.
Very early on in the `crisis´, Dr Luc Montegneir (I probably misspelled his name) the Nobel prize winner for discovering the HIV virus, was on French TV, live. He and his team of experts had analyzed the whole genome. He said, it was definitely altered in a lab, and it looks like they were trying to make a vaccine. He said there were bits of HIV and other things that were not naturally evolved. The TV guys got sooo alarmed. They ended the show abruptly, and I never saw him on TV again.
He states very clearly in his original paper that they never isolated HIV.
The genomic analysis phase came later after persistent failures to find it, led to a means to no longer need to look. The whole genome has never been found but as a postulated entity is reconstructed from specific arbitrary selections among many millions of short code pieces of indeterminate origin.
The analysis of such a composite lab computer artefact is not where to start! Let him analyse the s-proteins supposedly derived from the model for this is where Martin's work reveals the GoF has focused in as regards patent trails going back years!
Gallo stole and misrepresented Montagnier's work and published his fraud direct to MSM bypassing even peer review. HIV has no more direct evidence than Sars - biomarkers are used to fit life to the pathological model, hence the replacement of doctors with technicians with screen robots and apps.
But you are right that the issue is so charged that anyone in Media or Establishment is terrified of attracting penalty, and yet once a sense of permission is felt, the GoF research stuff is prompted or leaked for promotion. Its all timing in terms of social/human restructuring. All human intention has unintended consequences, so we can hope that evils serve a greater good regardless blind or inhuman agenda.
Having had a totally disappointing conversation with Montagnier, Kary Mullis intellectually shredded the HIV thing.
Yes, I think the whole field was barking up the wrong tree, and most viral research is based on false assumptions. Even Birx and Redmond were censured for misrepresenting the science around AIDS. They kept misrepresenting, and became the heads of their agencies!
The point I was trying to make here is that They were trying to make a vaccine. The interesting language in the Veritas docs recently published supports this.
Here is another take you may find interesting; https://www.bitchute.com/video/LukPaRDJHysl/
I'd seen Shankara Chetty with Fuelmich and looked for a separated out vid - thx.
The hypersensitivity/allergy theory for the 'weird complication is established imo but I remain sceptical as to s-protein being a virus - but it could be in vaccines prior to covax .
Hamer's GNM theory on allergy is of direct or indirect association with a biological shock such as to then retrigger the conflict and reaction on subsequent exposures.
The veritas doc indicates that the presumed viral soup is the vaccine resource Which is also shown by revisiting cytopathic test cultures with a control that introduced no 'viral matters' and still produced 'cytopathic effect'.
It states a few things that if it was in fact verified would help - but regardless of truth would damage if revealed a fake release that had been given weight...
I wrote something saying as much as this because what other sense is there to make of it?
Duh of course they produced hacksxxxine first , how else couldn't hey pretend they had a dangerous virus?
The viruganda required a good hacksxxxine so the big Harma can get a big benefit with....no liability, full immunity...ha ha
Croak
Trippy indeed,
YEP! that's what I've been saying from the start, they weren't making viruses in gain of function but vaccines, aka poison drugs....
And now we know why pre vaccine avg age of covid death is at or a bit above life expectancy....
hahah https://drsambailey.com/2022/01/05/why-nobody-can-find-a-virus/
And oh yeah, the spanish flu ummm shots anyone? LOL
https://epidemiologyexplained.com/the-spanish-flu-was-neither-spanish-nor-flu-bombshell-or-atomic-bombshell/
It probably has something to do with Michael Callahan. This article from July 31, 2020 explains it:
Whitney Webb: DARPA’s Man in Wuhan
Michael Callahan’s career began in USAID and in the bioweapons labs of the former Soviet Union, advancing the agenda of the global bioweapons and pharmaceutical cartels. He would take what he learned there to execute a massive expansion of DARPA’s biodefense portfolio and today finds himself squarely in the center of the origins of the coronavirus pandemic.
Two programs in particular developed by Callahan while at DARPA would later play a critical role in his future involvement in the broader story of the SARS-CoV-2, a.k.a. COVID-19 and the vilification of China, IP and the advancement of a global vaccine regime.
The Accelerated Manufacture of Pharmaceuticals (AMP) program was created by Michael Callahan in 2006, barely a year after he first came on board as DARPA’s portfolio manager. Its purpose was to find technologies that could “radically accelerate the manufacturing of protein vaccines and protein-based therapeutics”, with the goal of “revolutionizing protein therapeutics and vaccine manufacture” through the private sector.
The program’s mandate dovetailed with concurrent efforts to fundamentally transform the U.S. government’s approach to vaccine manufacture and (Medical Countermeasures) MCMs.
https://unlimitedhangout.com/2020/07/investigative-reports/darpas-man-in-wuhan/