159 Comments

I really like Bob Moran's take:

"Now is a good time to remember that there are many elderly people in this country who are dying and who are still forbidden from seeing their families. There was one person whose duty it was to protect us from tyrannical cruelty.

That person did nothing."

Expand full comment
Sep 9, 2022·edited Sep 9, 2022

Hmmm....maybe. I think the fact that people too often miss is that the British monarchy was deposed in a coup d'etat (more popularly - and mockingly? - known as The Glorious Revolution) in 1688 by the money changers. The monarchy has been a gilt-and-velvet front for, and puppets in a gilded cage of, the money changers since then. That doesn't make them blameless; but perhaps it casts them in a different light? So, while you may believe it was The Queen's duty "to protect us from tyrannical cruelty," the money changers who pulled her strings probably do not.

Also interesting is the claim made by some that The Queen's coronation in 1953 was a sham, a theatrical production, and that therefore all oaths, promises, etc, made by The Queen are null and void. Who knows?!

The parallels with the USA's Constitutional Republic being overthrown by the money changers in The Act of 1871 and their THE UNITED STATES, INC., are, to me, striking. It seems that the head of state of both the UK and the US are puppets of the money changers.

Expand full comment

The Crown was stolen in the 13th century by the Roman Catholic Popes. The British monarchy was never more than a figurehead since then. The Queen and all her family are Guelph, Saxe Coburg & Gotha, a German/Venetian bloodline which usurped with William of Orange and created the British Empire that was never British.

The Temple Bar rules the world via its 'rules-based international order' that few people know about but is explained clearly in this document. Yes, the UK & US are puppets of the Black Nobility of old Venice, so are almost every other country. Totalitarianism is almost complete.

https://francesleader.substack.com/p/what-does-the-rule-of-law-mean

Expand full comment

Whoa, Frances! I just read your linked rule-of-law piece. Mindblowing! That should be required reading for every registered voter everywhere! Bravo!!

Expand full comment

I agree and included in today's post about Queen Elizabeth.

https://francesleader.substack.com/p/the-royal-family-is-not-the-crown

Expand full comment
Sep 9, 2022·edited Sep 9, 2022

Henry VIII might want your head for claiming that he was only a figurehead. I think he would argue that he re-asserted the primacy of the British church when he formed it again. But yes, I know what you mean - and thanks for the link.

It was the Guelphs basically who were behind the coup d'etat in 1688.

Didn't the Black Nobility originate in Babylon, home of black money magic?!

Expand full comment

They make all sorts of claims about their heritage but I think they were also known as the Sea People aka the Phoenicians hence the name Venice which derives from the Phoenix, double headed beastie seen on many a flag. The founders of Venice, who created that city out of a mosquito infested swamp, were the escaping Roman Senators who fled Rome in 455AD, running away from the Goths and other angry Germanic tribes.

So, it would seem that the Venetian Black Nobs have been ruling the world with Roman Empire 2.0 ever since. They called it the British Empire to disguise the true owners. It was never British. Venetians created the 5 slave colonies (the 5 Eyes) by exploiting the impoverished British and forcing them to migrate to escape persecutions. Horrible history!

Expand full comment

Yes, and who were the Romans? Weren't they Etruscans? And who were the Etruscans? They were descendants of the non-Judaic so-called "Lost" Ten Tribes of Israel, who arrived in Italy from Troy - the same people who also settled in Britain under Brutus of Troy around 500 BC, and from whom Britain takes its name. Until Tudor times, it was a legal convention that any British king had to be able to trace his ancestry back to Brutus. They were the real deal!

Expand full comment

Now we have the Golden Orb, the sun rising in the "West". Interesting....

Expand full comment

Before all that, the money changers had conspired with Oliver Williams (aka Cromwell) to foment The English Civil War and topple the Stuarts, who were at least legitimate, if nasty, kings. After the Restoration, the money changers continued to pile the pressure on the Stuarts by trying to starve them of funding, to which Charles II counter-attacked by having his brother, Prince James Stuart, Duke of York (the future King James II) burn The City down in The Great Fire of 1666 with the help of a number of French agents (some of whom were caught in the act of starting fires and rescued from the mob by James himself and his bodyguard). As the subsequent parliamentary enquiry showed, the Monument/Pudding Lane is complete fakery, misdirection, disinformation (“Architecture of Power,” Robert Shaw, Cymroglyphics).

The money changers had their ultimate revenge when James abandoned his claim to the throne at The Battle of the Boyne in 1690. According to Andrew Power’s fascinating book, “Ireland, Land of The Pharaohs,” it was not a battle at all, rather it was an esoteric Horus ritual. In the end, did the money changers just bribe him to walk away?

While scribbling about the Stuarts, is anyone else surprised that Charles has chosen “Charles,” a Stuart name, as his regnal name? The Stuarts hardly covered themselves in glory, and they and Charles’s more recent alleged ancestors were hardly the best of friends. Could it have something to do with introducing the genes of Diana (a descendant of one of Charles II’s platoon of illegitimates?) back into the bloodline? Do we see Hanover and Stuart re-combined in William? Is that why the Charles-Diana marriage was arranged?

To add to that mix is speculation about those “alleged” ancestors. If it is true, as many claim, that Victoria was the illegitimate daughter of The Duchess of Kent and the courtier, Sir John Conroy, that might cast another interesting light on matters. Is Victoria’s alleged illegitimacy the reason that she, her mother and Conroy were all detested by the courts of George IV and William IV? Is it the reason Victoria hated her own mother?

If the monarchy is, to all intents and purposes, fake, does any of it matter?!

Expand full comment
Sep 16, 2022·edited Sep 16, 2022

Frances, I'd like to offer a couple of observations on the Lying-in-State ritual currently being performed in Westminster Hall: firstly, the coffin and catafalque rest on an octagonal dais. The insignia of both the Order of the Garter and the Order of the Thistle is an eight-pointed star. The octagon and eight-pointed star are symbols of Inanna, also known as Ishtar/Isis/Venus/Aphrodite, The Great Goddess, Queen of Heaven.

Aphrodite’s great-great grandson was Brutus of Troy, who founded Britain c. 500 BC, from whom the royal family claim descent. Until the so-called Glorious Revolution of 1688, it was a legal convention that, to be a British monarch, you had to be a descendant of Brutus.

The Goddess is still worshipped in parts of Britain today. King Arthur died after the Battle of Camlann in 579. His forces were fighting for Christianity. His opponents, led by Mordred (IIRC Arthur’s nephew) was fighting for The Goddess (YT: “Ancient Goddess worship at Camlan”).

Secondly, the placement of the guards standing vigil around the catafalque reminds me of the arrangement of the bluestones around the altar stone at Stonehenge, which suggests to me that the Lying-in-State has some sort of energetic function.

Signs and symbols?

Does any of that resonate with you, or am I barking mad?!

Expand full comment

Thank you

Expand full comment

The timing of all things/events "elite" I go hmmm.

Expand full comment

Ooh that is so strange! That is exactly what my son said but with very bitter overtones.

Expand full comment

I'm UK. Well, all I can say is, how long have they had her in the chiller, and what are they covering up.

Well.....I know a ton of what they are covering up, but I winder if there is something specific. Or maybe there is some ritualistic thing to this timing and King Charley of the WEF taking his long awaited crown.

Expand full comment

rise of the anti-christ maybe

Expand full comment

Absolutley nothing would surprise me right now.

Expand full comment

That’s brilliant. You never know..

Expand full comment

Somehow, I doubt that Charles is "of the WEF." I think the royal family have for centuries been puppets of the people behind the WEF. My take is that Charles is doing what he is told. I also think that Andrew's downfall was a warning to Charles to toe the line and to say/do as he is told.

Expand full comment

The royal family does not tow the line. They are the bloodline. He is connected to the WEF and is participating in destructive protocols. We are not related like these people are even if you go back 1000 yrs. Andrew is a sexual predator like bill Clinton and many others. There is no accountability for these maggots. They are not English and most likely are not catholic. If they were good people, jimmy saville would have been brought to justice. He was buddies with the new king. These people haven’t worked a fucking day in their lives and are parasites. 

Expand full comment

That's a fair take. I'm no expert on all this. We mere peasants can but speculate the depths of darkness that this whole charade sinks to

Expand full comment

https://people.com/royals/queen-elizabeth-final-appearance-just-days-before-death-appointing-new-prime-minister-scotland/

I wish you would do just a minimal 20-second search before you make these dumb comments. Oh, I know, that is a body double?

Expand full comment

So sorry, did I not write (TONGUE FIRMLY IN CHEEK) after saying something tongue in cheek. I think you may have been sat on the beach too long.

Expand full comment

Haha sorry - but later on in the comments I noticed someone did suggest it was a body double. Hard to know who's tongue is in cheek these days. Its not incredibly obvious amid the guns below. If only I had been sitting on the beach - it has been raining endlessly in the state of Victoria - more likely to be the result of mold on the brain than heat stroke.

Expand full comment

def looks like body double

Expand full comment

She was a parasite, nothing more. In addition, she has cousins in the US congress, senate and is related to most of the US presidents. Cousins in Horrorwood as well. Her bloodline stretches across the world. She was related to all of the UK PM's and most likely the new one. You will see the entire world fawn over this parasite. This bloodline rules over the world....no bullsh T. Now the funeral. Her husband was a parasite as well. I try to give Diana's boys a pass but they have been poisoned by Charles the parasite. I piss in their general direction.

Expand full comment

If you go back far enough (1000 years?), we are all related.

Expand full comment

I recall standing on the sidewalk of Kingsway Avenue in South Africa, holding a British Flag as the open car with the child Elizabeth and her younger sister Margaret and their parents sped by. I may have been 6 or 7 years old, and people were abuzz regarding the royal visit.

She survived a long time, and I am sure it was due to the excellent healthcare she experienced from Homeopathic physicians in England throughout her life. I read about that as I grew interested in good health care!

Expand full comment

Yeah, you can find her Homeopath giving lectures and a debate on Youtube. He is a traditional doctor and a Homeopath and he makes a very good case. Tbh I always thought Homeopathy was woo and about as likely to work as Orgone or Urine therapy although I did admit I knew nothing about it.

I liked his analogy about memorysticks being tiny but containing tons of information much like how Homeopathy works.

No idea if that is true but I enjoyed it.

Expand full comment

Modern western medicine ("Allopathy") is a creation of the Rockefellers designed to push oil-based pharmaceuticals. It's a disgrace.

https://www.europereloaded.com/western-medicine-rockefeller-medicine-way/

Expand full comment

Thanks for your message, Colin, I did not know that. I recalled there was a woman Homeopath who wrote a book on Homeopathy - and helped the Royal Family. I never studied Homeopathy formally, but was shown the Bach Remedies early in my life by a SA Homeopath, and I went for that modality enthusiastically and in all directions - have had a practice for over 50 years, and thousands of essences, I have collected and co-created - many myself, and with colleagues, taught workshops and still use them creatively now. My web site needs an update, but it is still www.Patsgarden.com. Best wishes, Patricia

Expand full comment

Your site won't come up. It is a mostly blank page with a tiny picture in the middle of a paper with a frowny face. 😔 --- I use a VPN is that the problem?

Expand full comment

I need to spend some time updating it. I still have the website and my email. Have had to heal myself from a fall a few weeks ago - I am 81 and not very good with technology, but I see an excellent chiropractor in Berkeley this Friday, and hope to be able to get something up soon. I still take clients and email my own designed Forms to begin the work. Essences@patsgarden.com

Expand full comment

Take care of yourself first.

Expand full comment

Thank you - I am learning to do this -how did you get so smart? LOL, Patricia

Expand full comment

I wonder if she is another "died suddenly" casualty 😢

I mean no disrespect, but I can't help but think of The Smiths's "The Queen Is Dead":

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fs5j3NgEDxs

Expand full comment

I wondered the same, but having to meet two fuckwitted prime ministers in one day was probably what did it

Expand full comment

She was 96 and her husband to whom she was very close died a little bit over a year ago. This sort of thing happens with long-term married couples.

Expand full comment

Oh yes, Prince Philip—I quote him under #9 – Extermination of the 10 Stages of Genocide in this piece:

• “Letter to a Holocaust Denier” (https://margaretannaalice.substack.com/p/letter-to-a-holocaust-denier)

Perhaps he’s gotten his wish …

Expand full comment

MAA, that #9 was a potent section.

Expand full comment

Lords and ladies of death, 2022.

Expand full comment

Her mobility issues were due to gout. I believe she also had cancer; but with cancer you wouldn't be up and about 48 hours before the end. You'd be out of it on morphine. Maybe the coup de grace was a stroke or something on Tuesday?

Expand full comment

I'd wonder how many vax shots she got, and if she got boosted recently...

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
Sep 9, 2022·edited Sep 9, 2022

No, HM will be crowned at his coronation, which may not happen until next spring or summer - no doubt on a suitably auspicious date!

Expand full comment

I'm English.

The TV and radio are off.

Expand full comment

We need that to happen for a few months, and in the U.S. for a few months too, to wean people from the propaganda (err, I mean news. . . . ).

Expand full comment

well i wont miss her but im sure i'll be sick of the endless coverage by tomorrow let alone the funeral bs.

i think its time for a republic!

Expand full comment

I thought that for years until I reviewed all the current heads of state I could think of and decided a Hanoverian was not the worst we could do.

Expand full comment

Be careful what you wish for. 🇺🇸

Expand full comment

wef puppets or wef puppets, there has to be another choice

Expand full comment

Hi Celia.

Now it’s official it does feel a little strange. I had a royal appointment to HRH Prince Charles, I dry cleaned his suits for 15 years. I met him a few times, nice enough chap. But just a man, lucky enough to arrive on this planet through a very particular portal. I was never happy bowing to someone who didn’t bow back.

As to his mum, her passing will leave a hole that I don’t think anyone will fill. And I think that’s a good thing in so many ways. The idea of a new monarch now is abhorrent; the pomp and ceremony in all of this suffering would be unbearable.

I won’t miss her or anything she represents. We should say goodby to every entrenched hierarchy and move on to a more evolved and responsible process of organising our civilisation.

Expand full comment

Fascinating book offering apologetics for a monarchy. It is called "Freedom Wears a Crown" by John Farthing.

Expand full comment
Sep 8, 2022·edited Sep 8, 2022

Celia, these "people" aren't like us, as Icke and others have been telling us for Years.

There's no one there to feel sorry for.

Expand full comment

Harry is pathetic. Must have been losing his mom so early, and knowing something??

Is that why he went rogue to that Harpy harridan Megan ?

Expand full comment

I think she or at least her ethnicity were planned, directed. Useful for the narrative and optics

Expand full comment

Makes perfect sense.

She’s so vulgar and unlikeable

Expand full comment

Yes, he certainly has an image problem; but he also has some very real emotional and psychological damage from the trauma of his mother's violent and all too public death when he was only 12. Like his mother before him, Harry needed a lot of support, help and love from the family but did not receive it.

Expand full comment

Yes with a dad cheating on his mom w that cow.

So much unstable behavior.

The Queen apparently was his rock.

Expand full comment
Sep 8, 2022Liked by Celia Farber

"And I don’t know why, but I feel something faintly inorganic about this."

~~~

And you say, I don't know nuthin' 'bouts poetree.

~~

"Oh come on man!"

~ JB

Expand full comment

Is that some pentameter or something. Please explain thanks

Expand full comment

Pentameter !?!

No gosh mi o my.

It's a quarternary, silly.

Expand full comment

That’s why I asked, Lol… some folks are instinctively lyrical

Expand full comment

Well isn't that peaches !

I'm lyrically instinctive.

Or somethin' like that.

Alright alright, just calm down Dr. Freud.

Now, I'm kidding there, the Freud part.

Expand full comment

King Charles - oh my.

Expand full comment

Yep - Don't think she ever wanted him to be king.

Expand full comment

I don't blame her. That's why I wonder about her death.

Expand full comment

Gulp!

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

Can’t we jump over him for William?

Expand full comment

He's no better.

Expand full comment

A couple thoughts and questions.

Does HMS just become “his majesty’s ships?”

Is it now “God save the king?”

Be on the lookout for the symbolism these demons like to use. They use these “events” as worship practices, and this should be the biggest one yet. The symbolism is going to be thick.

Expand full comment

I believe they will change it to Hir Majesty's Ships. Or maybe Xe's.

Expand full comment

Ha! Well played!

Expand full comment

Yes to both of those. Though it would be funny if Chas suddenly decided to adopt they/them (or xer)

... And as for the rituals... a great time for me to adopt the hikikomori (sp?) lifestyle.

Expand full comment

The what lifestyle? I’m intrigued.

Expand full comment

Oh it's the "shut in" thing that young Japanese men, in particular, seem to adopt. Basically like a hermit, but with decent broadband

Expand full comment

Aaah. Do what I did and flee to the woods.

Expand full comment

And mail-order sex dolls?

Expand full comment

How do you get mail order sex dolls in the woods?

Expand full comment

We get mail order sheep out in the woods.

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

What’s that?

Expand full comment

of course, many claimed that she died long ago, from the looks of her--i was just listening to a great interview with dr david martin last night on the anniversary of 9/11 + a great interview on by james corbett with richard gage- we're almost at the anniversary- imagine- Martin is a compelling speaker- https://rumble.com/v1iukvg-cowboy-logic-090522-dr.-david-martin.html This evidence has persuaded many who weren't really aware of the 9/11 controversy that I've sent this to ( i know- scary that people have never paid attention-- sort of like- well- right now.)

Expand full comment

I read an interesting intel report some months ago that said Queenie had already passed in accord with Mi6 reports. The passing of the sceptre seems to be the big theatrical event ahead. And--how many weeks of media remembrances to come? This should distract the uninformed masses in terms of the growing numbers of jabb'd athletes dying in the prime of life. The Queen had 96 years to live, while many of the vaxxed "Royal Subjects" are dying in their teens and twenties. Something very inorganic about this as well...I dare say! Thanks for the poetry btw!

Expand full comment

And yet there are pictures of her meeting new PM Liz Truss on Monday.

Expand full comment

But was that REALLY her? Body doubles have always been a thing with the "elites". The present Biden is NOT the same senator of the 80s-90s. Earlobes don't change as you age.

Expand full comment

I loved this queen. She has been Queen since the year I was born, I think. An amazing life, and a life well-lived. She believed in, and lived her credo of duty to country. She was totally dedicated to her country. I’m sorry for the British people on their loss. And doubly saddened for the British people because her son will become king now.

Expand full comment

The British reaction will be a mixed bag.

Many people love the royals, especially the older generations.

Many others despise them and see them as parasites.

Agreat many others like me don't think about them at all.

Charles is a pompous fool, but amazingly one of his children seems to be a decent human being. The other was a decent guy, but then got a succubus attached to him in Westminster abbey and became a woke wanker.

Expand full comment

The Royals are after all human beings with all the attendant flaws of all human beings. But to rise above those human frailties, and persevere for 70 years in dutiful and devoted service to country, shows amazing character. As I am 70, I recognize her accomplishment, and admire her fortitude, as well as her wisdom, in the application of it, at home and around the world. Sadly, it won’t be repeated by her weak offspring, the King. It’s a great loss.

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

Yes, brainwashed by the media, no doubt. Rumor is (and has been) that they've had her on ice for at least a year, like RBG, only to announce her "death" at the proper time. It's odd to me that the Biden administration has ordered our flags at half-mast. Did we do this when no less than 5 leaders of countries were assassinated because they refused to have their citizens injected with the experimental jab? Nope, that information barely made the news, and certainly did not include the common element about vaccine refusal. Each death was explained away as cancer, heart attack and terrorists being succesful in their attempts, cuz, ya know, assassinations happen.😒

My understanding also is that the entirety of the royals are deeply imbedded in the child/sex trafficking rings, adrenochrome and the unchecked migration of muslims. It will be interesting to see what changes occur under King Charles. He's a big proponents the urgency of "climate change" and the "pandemic". God bless the Brits living there. Queen Elizabeth will still have to account for her life before God. Her judgment day has finally arrived.

Expand full comment

There is a good reason why Biden ordered flags to half mast:

https://francesleader.substack.com/p/what-does-the-rule-of-law-mean

Expand full comment

Not satire; sincere emotion, based on a lifelong admiration for her dedication to her nation and her oath to duty, her strong character, and her devotion to Christian values. She was a remarkable Monarch, beloved by her country and the world. Thanks for giving me the opportunity to praise her again. 😁😉

Expand full comment