42 Comments

Dr. Malone just got de-platformed from Twitter. I guess if you're Trump you can lie about everything, but if you tell the truth about the worse public health scandal in history you get tossed. So much for Musk's new approach toward open debate.

Expand full comment

Agreed! I think they are allowing people to say whatever they want, because “they” are taking notes!! No thanks

Expand full comment
Nov 19, 2022·edited Nov 19, 2022

Celia, don't forget the David Knight Show (remember?). 🤗

Regarding the poll, I'm torn because The Constitution and its Bill Of Rights is/are the Supreme Law of the Land and, as such, Freedom Of Speech (on The Public Square) should never be put to popular vote. Hence the answer of course is, yes he should be reinstated along with many others. 🤷

Expand full comment

This shouldn’t even be up for discussion, let alone a vote. Why should someone’s ability to speak be at the behest of the mob?

Expand full comment

omg you had me on the wrong leg there ! WHO i thought world health org. or should i say the world death org. I like Musk in a way, but i think he is just a rich kid playing around. Will have to wait and see what he does.

Expand full comment

musk, like the other multi-billionaires is a pawn in their game. They don't want us to know that the cartel (whoever composes it) makes all of the decisions and they install muppets like Gates, Musk, et cetera so that we believe we know who is making things happen.

All of these fools are at the orders of people we can't see. If they tried to defy them, they would have an accident. For a doofus like B ill Gates it's no problem because he's been mind controlled since the beginning. The same cartel which owns these pawns owns the central banks and all of the best properties and all governments.

And now they want the exclusivity on life. They want us all dead except for half a billion of the most brainwashed who will be their self-maintaining robots.

And we've been cooperating at the level of 70 % on the fake "vaccine" bioweapons and 99.999% as far as carrying a tracking spying device on us everywhere we go.

I have alternatives to carrying that smart phone that could be rolled out quickly, wouldn't cost much. But the cooperation of the people is not coming, because most of them don't realize that there's an existential problem . Its shadow gets longer every day.

Expand full comment

I apologize to you. In my rush to get your words out on my getter account realized the credit to macDuff really is meaningless. Anyway your words are out there and hopefully convinces someone of the players in the shadows that direct the billionaire pawns

Expand full comment

I don't even know what a getter account is. MacDuff is because I used to play bridge with people who would say "lead away MacDuff" to the person who needed to lead if they didn't realize it was them. People are very good at remaining brainwashed. If you have a task to assign to a human, I suggest that it would be "remain brainwashed". That's where humans really excel.

Expand full comment
Comment deleted
Expand full comment

I believe I already did here, and was testing my theory that most people aren't seeing most of what has happened here. Not your fault at all.

37 years ago I was using a beeper. I believe that was on a 930 mhz frequency and that this frequency is like wifi, free for any doofus to use.

I would think that there are about 10,000 small to medium indian companies who would speculatively develop a device for me if I signed on to buy 1000 pieces.

So, this frequency is capable of penetration but not capable of high frequency, and therefore not able to send a high resolution video.

But it can sure send hundreds of kilobits.

and that's enormous.

in combination with the internet, it can do all the internet can do but avoiding the surveillance.

when the psychopaths will suppress the internt for reason of fake security, it will still be there and we'll be glad we have low bandwidth communication independent of the infrastructures created by the psychopaths.

That permits us to exchange messages like, ok, let's meet over at the county seat so we can eliminate the county commissioner from future subterfuge while all of our neighbors are looking at their smartphones waiting for them to tell them that everything is good again.

Expand full comment

Musk ain't the richest man in the World. That's BS the media constantly hypes. The Bankster families, Rockefeller, Rothschild, Warburgs, Lazards, a few others, are $trillionaires. They get to create most of the World's money supply out of thin air. They command media like Forbes to not show their obscene Wealth, as they try to rule the World in secrecy, from the shadows, promoting mindless puppets like Biden, Trudeau, Rutte and Arden to be their public face.

Expand full comment

The many ringed, multi layered circus in which we exist. Strings pulled by psychopathic clowns.

Expand full comment

Is he doing this just to troll people before he puts Trump back on? The idea that he would waste even a second in hesitating to do so only heightens the suspicions of those of us skeptical of Musk's Hero of Free Speech status.

Expand full comment

How many of those "million votes per hour" are bots?

Expand full comment

He doesn’t really care what we think. It’s a marketing ploy to increase Engagement activity. Do not comply. Don’t play the game. The rules are not in your favor.

Expand full comment

RIGHT and Wrong is never to be determined by a consensus of people or by a majority vote anyway!!! I think your idea of jumping on the Musk bandwagon and hypothetically giving him carte blanche to fix the messed up voting situation in this messed up country is ill conceived and shows a lack of discernment. Are you kidding us? Yes, something needs to be done, but Musk is not the answer.

Simply because Musk

wanted to put the question of whether to reinstate Trump or not up to a majority vote......oh please!

This is precisely why I dont blindly follow internet influencers

Expand full comment
author

Hm. Well, I suppose I didn't think it through. I was thinking it couldn't be worse than it is. And he's pulling out bot and rot code from twitter and rotten employees so it was I thought a logical step to think he and his crew could make voting work as a kind of new car.

As for this offensive question: "Are you kidding us?" My answer is no. I'm not "kidding" you. I had a thought and maybe it was off base but we try not to INSULT PEOPLE'S IMPULSES here.

I hope I have been clear.

Expand full comment

Thank you for your clarification. I appreciate your response and it says a lot. Goes a long distance to establishing trust

Did not mean to offend you. But I am not a mind reader, and want to be sure I am not being taken in by anyone. There are quite a few influencers out there that turned out not at all to be as they were intending to seem at first. I don't know you that well yet. Don't take it personally but I never blindly follow ANY influencer. Your posts seem pretty good so far, that's why I'm here! 🌟🤝🙏

Expand full comment
author

I'm sorry if I over-reacted. It's just that being wrong and off base is part of the process, one of the ingredients that I feel defensive about. I'm glad you are here, Catherine, and glad you are staying.

Expand full comment

Well, that only makes you human! God bless you!🙌🙏

Expand full comment

Totally disagree with your thesis in this one....Musk is just another globalist shill and he will either shut down Twitter completely or make it even worse than it used to be....one of the NWO's big goals is to shut down free speech...

Expand full comment

Twitter is the same with Musk running it. So a few people get their accounts back? Big deal, that was happening already, now and again.

Expand full comment

I voted because he contradicts himself by even asking the question. How can we call it free speech if only chosen ones get to speak? He’s made it clear that Alex Jones is a flat “no”. But I agree, this is interesting. And of course voting should be transparent. It’s only difficult to do on purpose, and we know why...

Expand full comment
author

I disagree. He wrote "no," but I took it to mean, "not now."

Expand full comment

Let’s see if he reinstates Scott Ritter, who was banned and created a new account the day Musk took over, then kicked off again soon after. I heard it was too early to blame that takedown on Musk. Time will tell. :)

Expand full comment

He seems to be fairly direct (when he is not trying to be coy) Kind of ‘no means no’ kinda guy. But so curious and interested on your take of ‘not now’.....

Expand full comment

Can we ban Elon from Twitter?

Expand full comment

Over Here, to have to ask WHO? Man, mouse, or Muskrat?

Expand full comment

The idea of using technology for elections is very bad (I'm a recently retired software engineer - so not anti tech but I understand tech better than 99.9%). It is too easy to rig so no Elon is not the one to help clean up elections. Paper ballots handled properly are the best solution.

Everyone should be allowed on Twitter - no voting needed.

Expand full comment

You could say it again. And again.

Expand full comment