Readers Exchange Perspectives: What Is 'Revelation Of The Method' And What Can Non-Occult Ordinary People Counter It With?

I don't mean "counter spells!" What Can We Envision For OUR "Future" And Is it Realistic Or If it Isn't Is That Perhaps OK Too?

Petra Liverani wrote:

It's part of the occult "revelation of the method" aka "hidden in plain sight" element of their psyops.

While the 9/11 base narrative is ludicrous to start with they embellish the ludicrousness with our terrorists popping up alive, other contradictions and insane impossibilities and very obvious fakery, etc.

This is logical fallacy 11 from my post: 11 logical fallacies unmasked in the use of the terms "conspiracy theory" and "conspiracy theorist"

11 logical fallacies unmasked in the use of the terms "conspiracy theory" and "conspiracy theorist"

11. When the rule is that they must “tell” us the truth underneath the propaganda how is the rejection of the narrative in the realm of “theory”? The Loaded Question fallacy

Loaded Question fallacy - a question containing an unjustified (and often offensive) presupposition

The use of the word “theory” tends to suggest that a rejection of the narrative is based on thin grounds, however, we are told that those in power feel an obligation to “tell” us what they’re really up to in order to absolve themselves of responsibility for their Big Lies thereby putting the onus on us to call them out. If we don’t - according to their reasoning - we’re the ones at fault and thus they are spared karmic repercussions.

This is known as “revelation of the method” or “hidden in plain sight.” Indeed, the evidence for signals before (known as “predictive programming”), during and after their psyops is abundantly clear, not to mention an often lacking-in-credibility base narrative to start with … so the notion of “theory” is laughable. Admittedly, however, they lead us via multiple propaganda threads (often contradictory) on lots of wild goose chases and along lots of red herring trails so that even though the disbelievers might get the fact that a Big Lie has been told correct - zero theory about it - they are often misled in determining the true nature of the event being lied about, 9/11 being exemplar extraordinaire in that regard.

Whether it’s true or not that those in power aim to avoid karmic repercussions by obviously exposing their lies - seemingly counterintuitively - propaganda works better the less it corresponds with reality as stated in Fallacy No. 7. Presumably, if it didn’t, the “revelation of the method” technique would not feature in psyops.

Covid pandemic examples

Before:

Pandemic tabletop exercises: Event 201 (Oct 2019) and Clade X (2018)

Joint exercise by US agencies to respond to a severe pandemic of influenza originating in China, Crimson Contagion (2019);

Films: Contagion! The BBC Four Pandemic (2018), Pandemic (2016)

TV series: The Hot Zone (2019)

Bill Gates: The next outbreak? We’re not ready, TED talk, 2015

2003: Cough and Awe, SARS by any other name, Steven Ransom

Start/during:

A variety of against-reality claims and images, eg, a Chinese research team supposedly finds Chinese cobras and many-banded kraits to be “reservoirs” of the virus, a claim later said to be “complete garbage” (a common feature of psyops being the spouting of complete nonsense followed by denial of it) and images of people falling flat on their face and laid out on hospital floors.

Mike Pompeo telling us “We’re in a live exercise here,” in a press conference after which Trump leans over and says quietly “You should have let us … you should have let us know.” Neither Pompeo’s nor Trump’s words make any sense for a real pandemic … but they make perfect sense for a pandemic psyop or “exercise”.

Supposedly overwhelmed medical staff with seemingly lots of time to rehearse dance routines.

After:

This is a short video showing how we’re told the vaccine is 100% effective … but as time goes on the efficacy keeps dropping.

9/11 examples

Before: The Simpsons, 1997; numerous allusions in film and TV in this compilation - the item linked to is the pilot episode, “Pilot”, of the TV series, the Lone Gunmen, aired March 2001. This episode involved a character faking his death to uncover a conspiracy to hijack an airliner and fly it into the Twin Towers. Yes, really.

During: All the journalists (scroll to section Journalists - candid or scripted?) reporting on the collapse of WTC-7 refer to controlled demolition, not fire, and some refer to it having come down before it did.

After: The terrorists pop up alive … or just a case of mistaken identity? They yank us by the nose-ring this way and that.

There is no theory in the clear facts laid before us after we blow away the magic propaganda dust … the theory is all in the magic dust.

PERSISTENT OBJECTOR to new IHR

4 hrs ago·edited 4 hrs agoLiked by Celia Farber

Extremely interesting. Would you say there exists an effective method of opposing such things at the programme-predicted phase, ie before it is followed through? If those guys are that black-magickally minded, which they probably are: would a counterspell have to be worked? Or should praying be effective or, would it have to be public praying that explicitly stated it is a prayer against such and such scheme?

Celia Farber

48 mins agoAuthor

wonderful question.

Petra Liverani

Writes Psyop detective

2 hrs agoLiked by Celia Farber

You're getting into realms I've never even thought of. You know, you might have something there. I don't know. We could always try it. I tend to be very prosaically minded. All I think is: "It's propaganda. Just say, I'm not buying."

PERSISTENT OBJECTOR to new IHR

2 hrs ago·edited 2 hrs agoLiked by Celia Farber

Your description above made me think that, if indeed they feel compelled to inform us so we can react and if we don't, then it's our own fault - then there should exist, in their worldview or construct of reality, a proper way of reacting that if we do it, defuses their plans. I wonder if someone familiar with their belief system, or their world construct, might know about what they themselves potentially teach esoterically about any counter spells. And also outside their specific belief system, it may well be that in the Universe, opposing "wills" of groups might be in competition with each other and that by evolution, or thanks to God given free will, the stronger will prevails and manifests its vision. And a covert will can succeed all the better as it doesn't raise a counter will, a desire to stop the development. I mean, you already have so many examples of visions that get put into reality in absence of opposition because the rest is so inert, too unimaginative to anticipate what they realize only once the outcome is manifest. That starts with small examples in business and goes on to groups like the Comintern, or today, groups envisioning their takeover of attractive real estate, envisioning their island becoming a gated resort with adjacent 15 minute workers ghetto, doubling as built-in reference for showcasing their "smart" 4th industrial revolution products to potential buyers of the franchise licence, as well as envisioning, last not least, their takeover of global emergency powers. All that needs first to be envisioned by them, which is not a small feat nor uncreative. Evil too, of course. Whereas we the rest of us, are sitting here, envisioning not much ourselves. That is bad! A competing vision is what is needed, not just opposition to others' visions. A good competing vision, found, then shared, then endorsed and "willed" collectively by the 99% would be quite powerful I think. Or feel.

Petra Liverani

Writes Psyop detective

2 hrs agoLiked by Celia Farber

Well I'm into Dr Joe Dispenza's work at the moment which is all about creating your future. I think you're right. However, I had an email exchange with Gerard Holmgren's brother, David Holmgren, co-originator of permaculture and he said:

"There is a good reason why Observe and Interact is the first permaculture principle but over these last few years it has become clear that in general, understanding of permaculture ethics, principles, and participation in permaculture practices, networks and subculture communities have proven to be little better than any other set of beliefs and practices in inoculating people against sophisticated psyops from above."

“So I think there really is a problem in people simply accepting propaganda. I think they really do need to be educated out of it if possible. Permaculture people tend to have a vision of the future I think but obviously they can ignore all the things they've learnt and stick out their arms regardless. Nevertheless, I totally agree that we should envision the future we want rather than just think in reaction against what those in power want to enforce.”

Notes:

I boldfaced some parts for emphasis. —Ed

(Ed? That’s always me, Celia, expressing a tic of the antiquated profession of ‘journalism.’)