Formerly hidden, and now being revealed is traumatizing for me personally. I often feel like I’m in state post traumatic stress syndrome, and I am aware that my movements and thoughts are slowed by this heavy disquieting tragedy unfolding in front of us daily minute by minute.
We will be having increasingly more of these stories as the covid resistance start falling over with deadly covid era diseases and work out for themselves (ourselves) how to get over them. It's a journey that has just started for me, but one that I will share with many others as we all dare to emerge from the closet and admit to being sick.
Yes, we are spoilt for choice according to folklore. There is no doubt that there are many elements that can cure some form of cancer. But where is the information on which element cures which cancer at what dose for what duration. The science is simply not there. I cannot get tests to see what parasites have caused my two cancers. I cannot then apply the treatment appropriate to the parasites that are causing my two forms of cancer. I can cruise through the literature and see that some people recovered from some cancer with ivermectin or fenbendazole or artemisinin or apricot kernels yaddah yaddah yaddah - yes we are spoilt for choice, but it is hit and miss. Back when apricot kernels seemed to be the only choice, their success rate was a phenomenal 33% of terminal cases. But what about the other 66%? Might they have done better with wormwood? There are people who have cured their cancers with fenbendazole but that are many who have not. Why the difference?
For those of us personally impacted, this is not theoretical, it is life and death. I am punting on an artemisinin protocol. It's a punt. I am gambling with my life. What I am seeing on Substack is a lot of excited conjecture and absolutely zero real application to real human beings who really are abandoned by their utterly incompetent medical systems. In Australia we are 100% on our own, and in that context we need much better information to make informed decisions that, if we get them wrong, we are dead.
There is a Substack entirely devoted to reportage about cases of cancer cured by Fenbendazole. I will find it. Have you seen it? It's true that nobody can offer "guarantees." Have you eliminated sugar from your diet? I know how hard it is. But this is very very key.
Even the sugar is not as clear cut as the evangelists want it to be. If you get rid of all sugar and your blood sugar falls below a certain number, you collapse and that collapse can be fatal. There MUST be some sugar in your blood. So I have decided I will get that sugar from fruits that have healing powers in their own right, such as grapefruit, pomegranate, elderberry. The option to starve the cancer of sugar by not consuming any carbohydrates of any description, as every diabetic will tell you, is not realistic.
There is also the option of blocking the cancer cells from being able to take up what sugar there is. Berberine does that, and I am sure there are other supplements that do that too - I just don't know what they are.
And it seems that there are foods that cancer cells need more than sugar, for example, glutamine, that we are ignoring. Again, I have not wrapped my head around that yet.
It's a huge study and I probably don't have enough life expectancy left to put all the disparate research together to work out how to feed or starve my particular cancer cells and/or how to kill them in a myriad of other ways.
When you read up on fenbendazole you see that it has TWELVE different mechanisms for killing cancer. I have no idea where to start comparing that with its "competitors".
As a non-medical human being facing this prognosis personally, I need qualified, intelligent and interested medical personnel doing the analysis I am trying to do, and that I need to do, to increase my odds. I need help working out what treatments I should be using for which cancer. We all do. And our numbers are increasing by the day.
Instead, we have a bevvy of smirking and self-congratulatory, fame seeking, oily smiling faces, bragging about their medical status in the resistance community but actually offering sweet nothing to help those of us on the coal face save our own lives.
So far, there are just two of them, Lee Merritt and Bryan Ardis.
If you know of others who are confronting the reality rather than just attention seeking, I would like to know who they are, because although I am currently following roughly speaking the advice from Lee Merritt and Bryan Ardis, it is nowhere near enough.
But if you get onto the Facebook groups for fenbendazole and/or ivermectin, they are not quite as clear cut. There are many people using fenben and not getting the success. We are not clear about what protocol they are using, what dose, what duration and what else they are doing (most are doing both mainstream and fenben) so it is comparing apples and oranges. However, overall fenben seems to help slow or stop metastases, and slow or stop tumour growth but does not seem to get rid of tumours altogether. It does seem to be our best bet at the moment, but it is still a "bet".
Can you summarise? Is he is part of the parasite crew or does he have a different theory altogether? If so, a link would help me use my research time as effectively as possible.
I used to cover PE classes in middle/high school before "COVID." One of the films the teachers chose to show for the "health/sex-ed" component of PE classes was called "Little Secret." It's about a group of "HIV positive" teenagers who go on a whitewater rafting trip "united," I guess, by their "HIV positive" status. I believe most of them were on some type of AIDS pharmaceutical products. I always found the film disturbing, but I am certain it was not for the same reasons as others as I am someone who has always questioned the traditional AIDS narrative. It would be nice to play a film like "Positive Hell" as a kind of counterpoint to "Little Secret." But I doubt the public school district where I covered those classes would even allow it. Another reason I am grateful for "COVID"--I will never return to a public school again.
I see how it worked. HIV was never the cause of AIDS. People died of "AIDS" after they took the "antiviral" drugs. Far too many people who tested positive for HIV who never got AIDS, (i.e., the ones who refused the drugs) and far too many people who died of "AIDS" who never tested positive for HIV.
There are some striking similarities between the HIV/AIDS scam and the Great Covid Con - not least concerning the nefarious role of former National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases head honcho Anthony Fauci'. In both instances, he conspired to sideline inexpensive and readily available medications which could arguably have saved many thousands of lives.
However, I suspect relatively few of us are aware of the ex-NIAID leader's key involvement in quashing potentially sensational research which suggested the experimental COVID injections were tainted with HIV-1 - the virus blamed for the global AIDS epidemic still taking a tragic toll after 40 years.
In late January 2020, a nine-page scientific article titled “Uncanny similarity of unique inserts in the2019-nCoV spike protein to HIV-1 gp120 and Gag” was uploaded to the pre-print server bioRxiv. The authors, a group of researchers from India, listed a set of four short segments they’d discovered within the then-2019-nCoV spike protein’s genome that matched portions of HIV-1.
Fauci and his his collaborators were quickly off the mark to dispute and discredit the Indian team's findings, arguably preventing an epidemic of "vaccine hesitancy" from breaking out among the gullible public told to put their faith in Big Pharma's latest snake oil.
In the event, billions were persuaded to roll up their sleeves for what many believe are bioweapons responsible for millions of adverse reactions and hundreds of thousands of deaths and injuries worldwide.
To quote the old adage, “Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me".
And I was wondering if there’s any other documentary by her, and here it is! And I also found another documentary by her titled “Diary of an AIDS Dissident”.
And I was touched by what you said at the 1993 Berlin World AIDS Conference. You said,
“I think the truth can be suspended, rerouted, rejected for seemingly astonishingly long periods of time but I think it’s of like a kind of energy. I don’t think it can be destroyed. It is rather like an airplane in a holding pattern. It does have to land somewhere, eventually.”
I do hope this fraud will come down eventually because it has been suspended for 40 years now, which is an astonishingly long period of time.
Dear StellaMaris...Just say "no"....You don't have to take their "vaccines" and you don't have to believe their lies....Turn away from Babylon....now.
The Pharma overlords are the new Babylonians who have tried to destroy the image of God alive in our Mrna ....they failed and they will continue to fail. This beautiful earth and everything in it is a living testimony to the divine perfection that will be our ultimate heritage. Do not give the wreckers any more of your attention.
Celia has done magnificent work exposing the crimes and the criminals. Let the whole world see them for what they are....murderous madmen whose goal is to replace the divine. It cannot be done.
Yes, I think the HIV test for AIDS and the PCR test for COVID are a lot alike. And I think whether you take the antivirals or the vaccines after you test positive for these meaningless tests determines your future. Death or life.
Ah, but testing for antibodies for HIV was turned on it's head, as normally with production of antibodies, they claim you have immunity, as with what happens once you get vaccinated, so you are protected. With allegec SARSCov2 PCR test, with or without symptoms, you could be positive and by their logic of what antibodies mean, you should be protected against future infections, right? With the HIV+ result, they said treatment required. With SARSCov2 positive test, they made big noises that immunity was only shortlived and the "vaccine" would give better protection. Remember also, that no viruses, or contagion, has ever been scientifically proven.
Formerly hidden, and now being revealed is traumatizing for me personally. I often feel like I’m in state post traumatic stress syndrome, and I am aware that my movements and thoughts are slowed by this heavy disquieting tragedy unfolding in front of us daily minute by minute.
How about 100 more redpill films for free?
https://scientificprogress.substack.com/p/wake-up-videos
Thank you Cecelia. I appreciate your courage and the efforts you make. All of this knowledge
Tom my given name is Celia. :)
Later in life Luc Montagnier would cast doubt on HIV causing AIDS, but you never hear about that.
https://timothywiney.substack.com/p/the-stigma-of-water
He did as early as 1990 the first time, and they came down on him like all hellfire. He pulled back.
We will be having increasingly more of these stories as the covid resistance start falling over with deadly covid era diseases and work out for themselves (ourselves) how to get over them. It's a journey that has just started for me, but one that I will share with many others as we all dare to emerge from the closet and admit to being sick.
https://curingcoviddiseases.substack.com/p/from-covid-to-long-covid-to-melanoma
Yes, we are spoilt for choice according to folklore. There is no doubt that there are many elements that can cure some form of cancer. But where is the information on which element cures which cancer at what dose for what duration. The science is simply not there. I cannot get tests to see what parasites have caused my two cancers. I cannot then apply the treatment appropriate to the parasites that are causing my two forms of cancer. I can cruise through the literature and see that some people recovered from some cancer with ivermectin or fenbendazole or artemisinin or apricot kernels yaddah yaddah yaddah - yes we are spoilt for choice, but it is hit and miss. Back when apricot kernels seemed to be the only choice, their success rate was a phenomenal 33% of terminal cases. But what about the other 66%? Might they have done better with wormwood? There are people who have cured their cancers with fenbendazole but that are many who have not. Why the difference?
For those of us personally impacted, this is not theoretical, it is life and death. I am punting on an artemisinin protocol. It's a punt. I am gambling with my life. What I am seeing on Substack is a lot of excited conjecture and absolutely zero real application to real human beings who really are abandoned by their utterly incompetent medical systems. In Australia we are 100% on our own, and in that context we need much better information to make informed decisions that, if we get them wrong, we are dead.
There is a Substack entirely devoted to reportage about cases of cancer cured by Fenbendazole. I will find it. Have you seen it? It's true that nobody can offer "guarantees." Have you eliminated sugar from your diet? I know how hard it is. But this is very very key.
Even the sugar is not as clear cut as the evangelists want it to be. If you get rid of all sugar and your blood sugar falls below a certain number, you collapse and that collapse can be fatal. There MUST be some sugar in your blood. So I have decided I will get that sugar from fruits that have healing powers in their own right, such as grapefruit, pomegranate, elderberry. The option to starve the cancer of sugar by not consuming any carbohydrates of any description, as every diabetic will tell you, is not realistic.
There is also the option of blocking the cancer cells from being able to take up what sugar there is. Berberine does that, and I am sure there are other supplements that do that too - I just don't know what they are.
And it seems that there are foods that cancer cells need more than sugar, for example, glutamine, that we are ignoring. Again, I have not wrapped my head around that yet.
It's a huge study and I probably don't have enough life expectancy left to put all the disparate research together to work out how to feed or starve my particular cancer cells and/or how to kill them in a myriad of other ways.
When you read up on fenbendazole you see that it has TWELVE different mechanisms for killing cancer. I have no idea where to start comparing that with its "competitors".
As a non-medical human being facing this prognosis personally, I need qualified, intelligent and interested medical personnel doing the analysis I am trying to do, and that I need to do, to increase my odds. I need help working out what treatments I should be using for which cancer. We all do. And our numbers are increasing by the day.
Instead, we have a bevvy of smirking and self-congratulatory, fame seeking, oily smiling faces, bragging about their medical status in the resistance community but actually offering sweet nothing to help those of us on the coal face save our own lives.
So far, there are just two of them, Lee Merritt and Bryan Ardis.
If you know of others who are confronting the reality rather than just attention seeking, I would like to know who they are, because although I am currently following roughly speaking the advice from Lee Merritt and Bryan Ardis, it is nowhere near enough.
Probably the one you are talking about promoting fenbendazole or one put up by the same anonymous person.
https://substack.com/@2ndsmartestguyintheworld
But if you get onto the Facebook groups for fenbendazole and/or ivermectin, they are not quite as clear cut. There are many people using fenben and not getting the success. We are not clear about what protocol they are using, what dose, what duration and what else they are doing (most are doing both mainstream and fenben) so it is comparing apples and oranges. However, overall fenben seems to help slow or stop metastases, and slow or stop tumour growth but does not seem to get rid of tumours altogether. It does seem to be our best bet at the moment, but it is still a "bet".
Can you summarise? Is he is part of the parasite crew or does he have a different theory altogether? If so, a link would help me use my research time as effectively as possible.
Tom Cowan is not too interested in parasites. I don't understand why.
Thanks for sharing this film.
I used to cover PE classes in middle/high school before "COVID." One of the films the teachers chose to show for the "health/sex-ed" component of PE classes was called "Little Secret." It's about a group of "HIV positive" teenagers who go on a whitewater rafting trip "united," I guess, by their "HIV positive" status. I believe most of them were on some type of AIDS pharmaceutical products. I always found the film disturbing, but I am certain it was not for the same reasons as others as I am someone who has always questioned the traditional AIDS narrative. It would be nice to play a film like "Positive Hell" as a kind of counterpoint to "Little Secret." But I doubt the public school district where I covered those classes would even allow it. Another reason I am grateful for "COVID"--I will never return to a public school again.
https://walkyourtalk.tv/little-secret/
I'm grateful for you as well, that you won't. Even as a child I was terrified of my school. PS 87. I cried every morning my mother left me there.
You are in my prayers
I see how it worked. HIV was never the cause of AIDS. People died of "AIDS" after they took the "antiviral" drugs. Far too many people who tested positive for HIV who never got AIDS, (i.e., the ones who refused the drugs) and far too many people who died of "AIDS" who never tested positive for HIV.
AIDS is now rightly called "VAIDS."
There are some striking similarities between the HIV/AIDS scam and the Great Covid Con - not least concerning the nefarious role of former National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases head honcho Anthony Fauci'. In both instances, he conspired to sideline inexpensive and readily available medications which could arguably have saved many thousands of lives.
However, I suspect relatively few of us are aware of the ex-NIAID leader's key involvement in quashing potentially sensational research which suggested the experimental COVID injections were tainted with HIV-1 - the virus blamed for the global AIDS epidemic still taking a tragic toll after 40 years.
In late January 2020, a nine-page scientific article titled “Uncanny similarity of unique inserts in the2019-nCoV spike protein to HIV-1 gp120 and Gag” was uploaded to the pre-print server bioRxiv. The authors, a group of researchers from India, listed a set of four short segments they’d discovered within the then-2019-nCoV spike protein’s genome that matched portions of HIV-1.
Fauci and his his collaborators were quickly off the mark to dispute and discredit the Indian team's findings, arguably preventing an epidemic of "vaccine hesitancy" from breaking out among the gullible public told to put their faith in Big Pharma's latest snake oil.
In the event, billions were persuaded to roll up their sleeves for what many believe are bioweapons responsible for millions of adverse reactions and hundreds of thousands of deaths and injuries worldwide.
To quote the old adage, “Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me".
You may find this series enlightening. Here's Chapter 11 AIDS. bluemoonofshanghai.com/politics/15249/
Thanks for the link.
THE PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY IS TRULY EVIL. Thank you for sharing!
Thank you for sharing such a nice documentary by Joan Shenton. I’ve been watching “Positively False” over and over again lately.
https://www.positivelyfalse.org/
And I was wondering if there’s any other documentary by her, and here it is! And I also found another documentary by her titled “Diary of an AIDS Dissident”.
https://youtu.be/8yr7eYQrk_U?si=HTfaFAVDq6iKgFfD
And I was touched by what you said at the 1993 Berlin World AIDS Conference. You said,
“I think the truth can be suspended, rerouted, rejected for seemingly astonishingly long periods of time but I think it’s of like a kind of energy. I don’t think it can be destroyed. It is rather like an airplane in a holding pattern. It does have to land somewhere, eventually.”
I do hope this fraud will come down eventually because it has been suspended for 40 years now, which is an astonishingly long period of time.
HTLV has never been shown to exist. It's very simple. https://theperthgroup.com/
Dear StellaMaris...Just say "no"....You don't have to take their "vaccines" and you don't have to believe their lies....Turn away from Babylon....now.
The Pharma overlords are the new Babylonians who have tried to destroy the image of God alive in our Mrna ....they failed and they will continue to fail. This beautiful earth and everything in it is a living testimony to the divine perfection that will be our ultimate heritage. Do not give the wreckers any more of your attention.
Celia has done magnificent work exposing the crimes and the criminals. Let the whole world see them for what they are....murderous madmen whose goal is to replace the divine. It cannot be done.
They made it very difficult for many people to refuse in Australia, where widespread mandates were imposed - No Jab, No Job...to...No Jab, No Life.
See for example:
- The destruction of voluntary informed consent via mandatory COVID-19 vaccination. "A political decision, not a health decision" https://elizabethhart.substack.com/p/the-destruction-of-voluntary-informed
- Coercion, intimidation and mandates preclude voluntary informed consent for vaccination. There has been no valid consent for COVID-19 vaccination https://elizabethhart.substack.com/p/coercion-intimidation-and-mandates
Yes, I think the HIV test for AIDS and the PCR test for COVID are a lot alike. And I think whether you take the antivirals or the vaccines after you test positive for these meaningless tests determines your future. Death or life.
Ah, but testing for antibodies for HIV was turned on it's head, as normally with production of antibodies, they claim you have immunity, as with what happens once you get vaccinated, so you are protected. With allegec SARSCov2 PCR test, with or without symptoms, you could be positive and by their logic of what antibodies mean, you should be protected against future infections, right? With the HIV+ result, they said treatment required. With SARSCov2 positive test, they made big noises that immunity was only shortlived and the "vaccine" would give better protection. Remember also, that no viruses, or contagion, has ever been scientifically proven.