70 Comments

Just to mention the original husband is John Shipton. A lovely, deep guy I've personally met and worked with, on the NSW Wikileaks Party Senate seat bid. John has spent 10 years and every fucking cent, including his beautiful (ex) Newtown home, everything sold to fight the Evil Empire. I spit contempt and shitballs at our MSM & filthy Uniparty. From ABC to Channel 9 to SMH & Tele, you are fucktards, unworthy of licking Julian's boots...

Expand full comment

Interesting to come across your article—I was listening to Dan Dicks of Press for Truth giving his personal opinion that Assange was an intel asset. He wasn't convincing enough for me but I was suddenly struck with the thought that Julian was a MK-Ultra child. This came as a deep compassionate feeling of truth.

Expand full comment

That deep compassionate feeling of truth may be what the ancients called gnosis!

But interesting fact on Assange and MKultra. I’ve always stated: MK never went away, it just got rebranded into modern society: https://unorthodoxy.substack.com/p/the-success-of-mk-ultra

Expand full comment

True. The contemporary incarnation of MK-ULTRA is the metastasized, secret, worldwide targeting program which involves the DoD, the intelligence agencies, and all manner of other sources of power. It is essentially a vast mafia which controls governments throughout the world. Please study this website for some information about it: TargetedJustice.com/

I have been a Targeted Individual for thirty-four years, which is half my entire life.

Expand full comment
Comment removed
Jun 26
Comment removed
Expand full comment

1 John 2: 22 ¶ Who is a liar but he that denieth that Jesus is the Christ? He is antichrist, that denieth the Father and the Son.

23 Whosoever denieth the Son, the same hath not the Father: (but) he that acknowledgeth the Son hath the Father also.

Expand full comment

"Julian Assange has Had Severe Trauma For Most Of His Life—Yet Few Seem To Think It Matters"

Probably because he is a man. There is a different expectation depending on the sex of the person. Women are allowed to be victims of trauma, men are not.

And being stuck in victim mentality is pretty bad, but forcing people out of it is worse.

Expand full comment

He has numerous symptoms of dissociative PTSD and I worry people just "hero" him to death.

Expand full comment

Ah, I see.

Like a rockstar for intellectuals.

Well, it's best to "hero" people who already died, like St. Thomas Aquinas or Soren Kierkegaard. That way, only the idolater can be harmed.

Expand full comment

the squeaky-leak, get's the deal

Expand full comment

This is what the message on the video reads:

Video unavailable

This video contains content from The Australian Broadcasting Corporation, who has blocked it in your country on copyright grounds.”

Expand full comment

I have never trusted all these personas: Assange, Snowden, etc.

Expand full comment

I encourage anyone who is curious about how Assange called 9/11 unimportant, to watch this video:

https://rumble.com/v53qbi0-controlled-opposition-julian-assange-and-wikileaks-chad-chaddington.html

Expand full comment

Thanks for this info.

Expand full comment

Wow - I would trust their whistle blowing BEFORE any of the proven nefarious governments they are exposing!!!!

Expand full comment
Comment removed
Jun 26
Comment removed
Expand full comment

Agreed. 99% of 'whistleblowers' are in fact State produced actors who serve as limited hangouts. some are longer running than others. They even fake prison sentences. People just need their saviors and white hats, it is too salacious not to fall in love with for most.

Expand full comment

Life as a pool of sexual partners therefor results in so many kids faced with the choice to either find some way of celebrating their existence, or of adopting a mode of stoicism, which you can see in Julian Assange's face. And this is not even the worst-case scenario, to which the movie The Exorcist III brings the words of the Gemini killer to bear: "It's a wonderfull life, for some."

Expand full comment

Julian Assange is a hero, and I hope he can now find some peace. But I remain unconvinced about the rumor that he was part of the cult group The Family as a child. The only connection seems to be his mother's boyfriend MIGHT have been connected to the group. No evidence given, though I'd love to see some! More importantly, Julian seems never to have been parted from his mother, they went on the run from the boyfriend, but his mother did not turn Julian over to The Family. Anyhow, if anybody has any more evidence for this, it would be great to have it. Julian's life was hectic enough, I hope he wasn't stuck with those Family people for a while, on top of everything else! But if he was, that doesn't change the fact of the amazing things he did later in life. I do not believe for one second he is or was an intel asset of any kind.

Expand full comment

Hi Celia, Thanks for your excellent reporting.

I saw some discussion (here in comments section) of being blocked by some publications' paywalls. I recently learned a trick (on a James Corbett podcast) for getting past most paywalls (like it often does for me when I try to access NY Times' articles). Corbett recommends cutting/pasting article's URL into search bar here:

https://archive.ph/

Works for me almost everytime.

Just FYI. Take care.

Expand full comment

What makes you think he ever really left the control network that controlled "The Family"?

Was he competing the mission objectives of his controllers?

Maybe he's not what he seems.

Expand full comment

IF he is not what he seems, I think he would in such case be a victim, not a perpetrator.

Expand full comment

True, a victim used by the perpetrators to implement their plan.

I guess when you get down it, ultimately that's also true for most of the bad actors.

Expand full comment

that's a very dangerous broad brush you are painting with there my friend;

if a 'super soldier' is firing bullets at you, is he too a victim or a clear and present danger to your well-being?;

MK being the animal that it is, how do we know when the 'trigger' has been de-activated so that the victim is now truly a victim? and will that victim be left as a hollow shell victim or once again be 'triggered' back into 'super soldier' mode?

Expand full comment

Just posing the question Mark, maybe he isnt what he seems.

Expand full comment

when does an 'bad actor' change from being a victim into being a villain? is there a set 'definition' for when this comes to be?

Expand full comment

Why do you think they program the patsies?

At some level, they're "innocent zombies", which the cult triggers, sends out to do their( the cult's) crimes, then laughs as the broad group of " innocent zombies"

(the public) agonizes over the use of deadly-force in self-defense.

Expand full comment

The New Yorker piece is behind a paywall, dang it....

Expand full comment

Try just scrolling, even though it looks like a paywall. I certainly do not subscribe and was able to read it.

Expand full comment

Tried scrolling, no dice. I appreciate you putting this info out anyway, Celia. At least I can see the video. I am wondering who is documenting Julian's journey home: who took the shot of the back of his vehicle (presumably), him looking at the document, getting on the plane...and if there will be any more footage of his travels.

Expand full comment

No paywall for me, but often if you go to 'reader mode' in your browser, it bypasses the paywall.

Expand full comment

Hmmm, I will see if I can find that. Actually, no idea how to even look for that....will see tomorrow. Thanks!

Expand full comment

Yes, exactly what happened for me. With an occasional pop-up pushing subscription and periodic reminders that "you are reading your last free article."

Expand full comment

Blocked in Australia.

Expand full comment

The documentary? That's odd. (Or, not.)

Expand full comment

Yes - and how ridiculous!!! Every Australian has seen this footage when the ABC first broadcast it and on file ever since until NOW they decide to block it to Australians???

That means there is ONLY ONE REASON THEY NOW BLOCK IT FOR AUSTRALIANS - and that is, it no longer fits the narrative. They want ordinary Australians to permanently demonise Assange and paint him as a treacherous traitor to Western Governments. They do not want you to know his childhood and being exposed to one of Australia’s filthiest cults just might be the reason he ultimately did what he did!

Why is Assange being so demonised for exposing the truth of what the American military did anyway???

“They” say it’s because he compromised the safety of their operations??? Seems to me he exposed they were breaking laws and going against the Geneva convention etc. the military did not want the public to know about their criminal tactics and have turned the spotlight from their own, now exposed nefarious deeds, onto demonising the whistle blower, Assange instead!!! It seems to me we owe a debt of gratitude to Assange rather than think of him as a criminal. You only have to look at the disastrous and chaotic withdrawal from Afghanistan to know that something VERY BIG does not add up with the American military, the American government (Democrats aka O’Bumma & Biden) and the way they communicate with each other.

It is not healthy to be a whistle blower

- the end result is having the tables turned on you and finding yourself incarcerated, or “SUDDENLY DEAD”!!!

Expand full comment

Assange released video of Reuters journalists & Americans being killed by helicopter fire...that was the tipping point for the US...he had to go.

It doesn't matter what happened in his childhood or how much sex he had with whatever number of women (he wasn't married), the fact is he uncovered & shared information that showed people just how corrupt and malign the US & other governments are.

He did the right thing.

To turn that into some kind of bogus narrative where he is a deep state asset is laughable & paranoid.

Expand full comment

Download the brave browser. It comes with VPN and TOR built in so you can dodge this type of censorship :-).

Expand full comment

This just makes me shudder.

Expand full comment

It’s supposed to

Expand full comment

Celia -

I can't make sense of this part of your title :

..."Who ; Has Were They Working Under?"

Expand full comment

Completely agree - it sticks out like a sore thumb???

Expand full comment

the schematic provided by the 'disinformation machine', is a disingenuous map...

Expand full comment

Man I hope the truth about the connection comes out some way, some how. It's just too weird. I'd totally forgotten about his connection with The Family. Maybe I wrote it off as coincidence; but nowadays I'd be more likely to say that's basically impossible.

Expand full comment

So mind controlled to do things he wouldn’t ordinarily do???

Expand full comment

Looking at the media coverage on this. Seems very suspicious. Getting Sandy Hoax vibes.

Expand full comment

keep watching the bright lights of Broadway while we continue on our merry way with decimating your fellow man and the Sovereignty of your nation;

"look at me, look at me, look at me"

Expand full comment

Have you seen what David Sorensen thinks about Assange...... What Nobody Told You About Julian Assange

https://stopworldcontrol.com/assange/

Expand full comment