"The Place Was Beautiful."

"This is an avalanche of human suffering." Sounds Like The Globalist Cabal To Me. Maybe Forget The Word "Israel" Since There Are No Nations, As Such. All Wars Are Banker Wars

“I have been going there for ten years doing operations,” he said, “The place was beautiful; it was on the Mediterranean. It is so sad to see it destroyed. It will take forever to rebuild it again. The scale of the destruction I saw there is unbelievable.

“If you just walk a short distance the smell of death is still there. There are a lot of people still buried in the rubble. The bodies haven’t been removed. Only once the bombardment stops will we see the scale of the situation.”

He had been woken by the sound of distant Israeli rockets on Oct 7 - unaware of the horrors committed in Israel by Hamas that morning - but was told by the hospital authorities not to worry. Within half an hour, the reality of the gravity of the situation had sunk in.”

Dr. Abdul Hammad, quoted in The Telegraph

“This is an avalanche of human suffering.”

Imagine if we could go back to before Oct 6.

CNN (or BBC pick up) report on Israeli settlers in occupied West Bank terrorizing villagers, driving them off land.

Hippies with guns?

The fall of the west. Hamas did not topple us. The deadly notion that some races are worth more than others did.

Med-beds, blue violet ray machines, time travel, and the Baron Von Trump mystery discussed here. Hm. Very curious. The Baron Von Trump book is real. How is it possible? I’m not good at thing kind of thing.

It is my personal belief that the NWO controllers are now seeking to induce the masses to normalize child sacrifice, in the name of making sure Israel can “defend itself.” The lines you are given include but are not limited to:

”Doesn’t Israel have a right to defend itself?”

“They’re animals.”

“Nobody wants them. Ask yourself why.”

(Who’s “nobody? Does it include their parents?)

“They’re all terrorists.”

“There’s no such thing as Palestine.”

“It’s a figment in the imagination of Jew haters.”

“They want Israel wiped off the map.”

“They elected Hamas. It’s their own fault.”

“Kill them all.”

“Make it a parking lot.”

“Make it a glassed parking lot.”

“There are no innocent civilians.” (See Rep. Brian Mast, who has been photographed wearing IDF uniform in DC, scolding that no Palestinians are innocent, as no “Nazis” by which one supposes he means Germans, were innocent in WW2.)

“They’re not a state, they’re a territory, that’s about to probably be eviscerated and go away here shortly, cause we’re turning that into a parking lot.” Rep. Max Miller, Ohio.

Should American politicians speak like this? Well, they are.

All university protests reduced to “anti-semitism,” as Zionist Epstein affiliated billionaire class, like Leslie Wexner, pull their funding from Ivy Leagues.

As for Islamophobia, it’s no longer a thing. Say anything you want. It’s the new normal.

That’s where things stand.

Nobody is interested in curtailing the murderousness in our public language. That’s seen as helping Hamas.

I don’t see “Hamas” vs “Israel.” I see a massive Op to normalize child sacrifice. That brings us squarely into the super jarring question of “Satanism” which most people can’t cope with, so they go back to international politics. It is said Oppenheimer was an occultist. True or false?

What about ultra-violent Islam?

Here’s my question: The US murdered 500,000 Iraqi children and Madeleine Albright said it was worth it. Still, we call ourselves “great.” And we don’t think we act like terrorists, at all. Terrorists are Islamic.

Who designed “Covid?” That was some next level terrorism if you ask me. And it followed many principles of the occult, including the perverse desire to overtake and destroy children, an obsession with penetration, blood, force and needles, as well as chemical and synthetic biology Godheads. Before all that: A flood of fear. Satanists believe in scaring people to death if at all possible, or making people kill themselves. Satanists are never ever wrong. Never remorseful. Watch for that.

“We don’t negotiate with terrorists. We fund them.” (Meme, with photo of Joe Biden.) (Satire.)

Israeli SNL mocks LGBTQ as Hamas lovers.

So is Israel no longer a safe haven for LGBTQ people? Hard to keep up.

But mockery is always a very dark thing. Almost always.

This is neither Hamas as such nor even Israel as such. It’s more death fruit of the post Federal Reserve monetary system—all of it. But we don’t “understand” the monetary system, so we look elsewhere for “cause.”

The writings of my late friend Richard Kotlarz, monetary historian and whistleblower, (who also worked with Steven Zarlenga, who in turn, worked with Debbis Kucinich.)

Read about all this, here.

An outtake:

RECLAIMING AMERICA’S ECONOMIC PROVIDENCE

“The government [not private banks] should create, issue, and circulate all the currency and credit needed to satisfy the spending power of the government and the buying power of the consumers. The privilege of creating and issuing money is not only the supreme prerogative of government, but it is the government’s greatest creative opportunity. By the adoption of these principles, the long-felt want for a uniform medium [of exchange] will be satisfied. The taxpayers will be saved immense sums of interest. The financing of all public enterprises, and the conduct of the Treasury will become matters of practical administration. Money will cease to be master and become the servant of humanity.”

– Abraham Lincoln, as attributed in Senate Doc. 23, 76th Congress

”In the providence of Nations, each brings to humankind a gift. It is the destiny of America to establish in the earth a threefold social order to bring, first, a new birth of freedom, second, the rule of democratically determined law, and third, an economic life that nurtures individual liberty and provides for the common good. It is the neglect of this third dimension of the American experience via the abdication by Congress of its Constitutional power to create and issue the public’s own money that is at the root of unprecedented distress in the economic life of the nation, and, by extension, the world.

”Accordingly, We the People of these United States, mindful of the hopes and prayers of millions around the world, do resolve to restore the economic providence of the American nation.

“In 1690 the colonial assembly of Massachusetts became the first government in the Western world to issue its own paper money. It was based, not on precious metals, debt bonds, land parcels, or other privately controlled “backing” schemes, but on the need for a stable currency issued in proportion to commerce, the general welfare and human dignity. Massachusetts prospered, and its example was copied by its sister colonies. A protracted contention ensued between the American Colonies and the Mother Country to determine who would exercise the sovereign right to create and control the “coin of the realm”, and for whose benefit that power would be exercised.

”Representatives of the Colonies gathered at the Second Continental Congress in Philadelphia in June of 1775 and claimed the prerogative of the sovereign by issuing a new currency by fiat of the public will, the “Continental Currency”. A nation was effectively born, and the famed Declaration of July 4, 1776 followed.

”Benjamin Franklin stated the root of the matter succinctly: “The Colonies would gladly have borne the little tax on tea and other matters had it not been that England took away from the Colonies (the right to issue) their money, which created unemployment and dissatisfaction.”

”The struggle over the control of money was revisited time and again as the new nation evolved. Fateful events transpired around the chartering and eventual rejection of the First and Second Banks of the United States, financing of the Civil War, emergence of the Populist Movement, passage of the Federal Reserve Act in 1913, the money and banking legislation of the Depression era, the “farm parity” monetary reform of the WWII and demobilization period, and the slide into an unbearable burden of private and public indebtedness, which has culminated in the monetary crisis we face today.

”Furthermore, there are specific passages established already in the law by which the current monetary distress, can, and indeed is called to be relieved:

”On June 4, 1963, President John F. Kennedy signed Executive Order 11110, which invoked “The authority vested in the President by paragraph (b) of section 43 of the [Agricultural Adjustment] Act of May 12, 1933,” passed under Franklin Delano Roosevelt.

”This Agricultural Adjustment Act specifically directs the President to take whatever measures he deems necessary to protect the value of the currency of the United States, and states further in Sec. 43, Par. (b) that if he is unable to secure the cooperation of the Federal Reserve Board, or for any other reason determines that additional measures are required, he is specifically authorized:

“To direct the Secretary of the Treasury to cause to be issued in such amount or amounts as he may from time to time order, United States notes, as provided in the Act entitled ‘An Act to authorize the issue of United States notes and for the redemption of funding thereof and for funding the floating debt [bonds against the debt] of the United States,’ approved February 25, 1862. . . but notes issued under this subsection shall be issued only for the purpose of meeting maturing Federal obligation to repay sums borrowed by the United States and for purchasing United States bonds and other interest-bearing obligations of the United States: Provided, That when any such notes are used for such purpose the bond or other obligation so acquired or taken up shall be retired and canceled.”

”Taken to its logical end, the effect of this act is to specifically authorize, and indeed direct, the President to redeem Federal bonds with United States Notes as they come due if a stable currency is not achieved under the auspices of the Federal Reserve. It outlines a process whereby the debt of the Federal government can be retired in an orderly manner, and debt-bearing Federal Reserve Notes replaced in the money supply with lawful US currency.

”Kennedy’s executive order caused to be issued directly out of the US Treasury over $4 billion in non-interest-bearing United States Notes, in this case Silver Certificates. Further issues were halted shortly after his death.

”Significantly, the ‘Act of February 25, 1862’ cited in this 1933 legislation is Lincoln’s original “Greenback Act”, by which he declined to borrow the money to finance the Civil War, and instead issued $450 million in United States Notes. Had he acted otherwise, the debt from that war would remain as a burden of the Federal Government to this day, compounded by interest charges to many times its original amount. Lincoln’s leadership may well have redeemed the Union, on the battlefield, and in the financial arena as well.

”The Acts referred to above cite as their authority the power delegated to Congress to “coin Money (and) regulate the Value thereof . . .”, as stipulated in the United States Constitution. They remain the law of the land. Why then, it is fair to ask, are they not being implemented in this time of crisis?”

—Richard Kotlarz

Richard once told a documentary team, who placed him beneath the “debt clock” in Times Square, NYC, what he saw when he looked at all the spinning numbers. He said: “I see everything we think about when we don’t think about love.”

Coda:

Richard’s incredible and para-monetary answer…”Everything we think about when we don’t think about love…” Is that perhaps a good starting definition of what I call “Satanism?” Normally Satanists turn up and start scolding you because you “don’t understand what Satanism really is.” Have you encountered this? It is a “trope” of Satanists, to snootily dismiss you and me, us loser rubes, because we fail to get it right. I’m trying. They’re very thin skinned. I am not joking—they are.

I associate people who micro-correct other people as being a little Satan-ey. Wanting to inflict in another person, low self worth and shame. Believing in exactitude and rightness.

“Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the law.”

—Aleister Crowley

To which I say:

Why?