No, it was not about "viruses" it was about vaccines. For the BATS. To develop aerosolized and transdermal spike protein vaccines for bats in China. Ask yourself: Why?
The headline is slightly inaccurate, the main document in Project Veritas' "drop" did not originate with D.R.A.S.T.I.C., it's a new memo that (allegedly) corroborates documents previously leaked by D.R.A.S.T.I.C. with military intelligence.
If we had anything remotely resembling a free press in this country, there would be a 24-hour circus of television vans parked in front of his front door, beaming satellite signals all over the globe, demanding comment.
I read the Ecohealth Alliance proposal when the Intercept broke it. It was a tough read but the analysis and rejection letter confirmed. For goodness sakes, Glenn Beck did an entire film about it! Researchers must publish to survive. This is all documented in the journals and Celia provides some of the links. It is pointless to cast aspersions on PV or whomever for their funding. Look at the evidence and money trail. This analyst did that and had the basic understanding to interpret what he found. Logically, he tried to get military to pay attention. Looks like they didn’t (Couldn’t risk any publicity on this delicate program?) So, military brass fucked over their people to hide this ongoing research. I suspect this guy is ethical and couldn’t stand knowing his people would be subjected to myocarditis mandate and worse to no good effect. So, info was dropped. Hope he survives. Thank you Celia for confirmation. Many others are digesting this drop right now too. Material is dense and obtuse to lay people so it will take time.
Here's a follow up. I find these writers very hard to read. Would anybody else like to take a crack at understanding if this has meaning and if so, what?
Jan 13, 2022·edited Jan 13, 2022Liked by Celia Farber
We must never forget that the main point about COVID-19 is that there is no new virus and it is not just one thing. It's a cover story to generate trillions of dollars and unlimited power.
I'm skeptical of every conspiracy that is presented that overlooks this fact. Like the "virus was created in Wuhan" stories. It's as if the most important thing is to make sure that the sheep and the conspiracy theorists all believe that the virus is real. It is not.
A good percentage of conspiracies are released and propagated or co-opted by agent provocateurs as another means of control. Conspiracy propaganda exists just as much as mainstream media propaganda. The best way to do this effectively is the same as all propaganda. By telling people what they want to hear. People believe what they want to believe. This is an awful human trait.
Don't give up your critical reasoning skills. They are more important now than ever before. Always search for motive to determine likeliness of truth. If there are trillions of dollars at stake, chances are 100% that they will be lying at every opportunity.
Well said. This is a critical comment. Beware of anyone who argues that a virus exists, as it simply perpetuates the lie, promotes more incessant “talk” about how to overcome it, and enables all kinds of alternative “solutions” to be offered up. The alternative solutions themselves are then incessantly debated, all to deal with what has always been in fact a non-existent problem.
The key aspect of these manufactured events is that the fake “problem” is purposely and immediately overwhelmed by the many distractions of the various “reactions” (media reports about the “virus" origin and spread) and “solutions” (imposed measures of mask wearing, social distancing, lockdowns, vaccines, vaccine mandates). It’s to get everyone off the main premise of virus existence. The ensuing debates about the efficacies of these measures in “stopping the spread of the disease,” along with questions about government overreach and subsequent revelations about whatever nefarious schemes have been conducted by those in charge, also further distract if they don’t address the fundamental premise. I would argue that all of that is intentional, designed to keep those who are ultimately incapable of ever piercing the veil (i.e., to discover that there was never any “there…there”) in a state of perpetual confusion and anxiety.
Thus, anyone who continues to say a “virus” exists, despite all the evidence to the contrary and which they seem never to address (excluding people like Tom Cowan, Andrew Kaufman, Christine Massey), just keeps the incessant talk alive. It’s very simple: there’s no problem; so no “solution” is required.
Granted, the REAL problem of illness is an entirely other matter, but it is an INDIVIDUAL matter that each of us deals with as we always have…individually (i.e., when we get sick). Real problems are always only confined to this local realm of the individual and his/her community (although I would argue, as Cowan does, that “contagion” is itself a myth). This means these problems should never be foisted on the collective body (i.e., all of humanity) because no problems are actually global in reach. Otherwise, all of us are then forced to deal with something that may only affect a few of us and then only locally.
As a side note, I always say to anybody who confronts me about not wearing a mask or being vaccinated, “I’m not sick.” (If pressed further, I'll add, “Plus, YOU’RE wearing a mask and are vaccinated, so what’s the problem?”)
So be wary of anyone who doesn’t address the basic premise of the existence of the “virus.” If they say it exists, then ask them to prove or show it, as the burden of proof is on them.
Great comment. I just wanted to highlight an extremely important point. If viruses are so damn dangerous and may kill us all, there is no way that humans would have existed this long. This planet is far, far older than recorded history. Equilibrium between viruses, bacteria and all other living things has been long established.
That is logical. I agree that contagion doesn't exist. Not by viruses anyway, though the ones pushing them might qualify.
Jan 13, 2022·edited Jan 13, 2022Liked by Celia Farber
"What am I looking at?" An aerosolized poison to spray on bats in the wild? How? Delivered by a swarm of AI-controlled, electro-mechanical humming bird -size drones mounted with atomizers? Hmmm, perhaps a 'delivery system' like that could be repurposed to deliver aerosolized Fentanyl to 'targeted' humans
I'll leave it to RFK Jr and all of the Rockefeller devotees propping up the vampire, nazi medical establishment which is now feeding and experimenting on the entire human population, to 'explain' the origins of the non existent Sars CoV 2 virus. You can learn Klingon (and maybe even it's many dialects) but that doesn't mean that Klingons are real.
Someone commented about Project Veritas's funding sources on an Off Guardian entry (James Corbett interview Robert Kennedy; It was awful!) without providing links that led to information to support the idea that PV is untrustworthy. It was quite a distraction for me, but I had a quick check (which still took too much time out of my day) and found that, indeed, O'Keefe's funding sources are stinky. I am far from expert in foundations and charities but I am aware of some of the bigger bad ones. With PV, you have: Vanguard, Charles Schwab & Donald J. Trump for example. Go just a little deeper and you'll see Rockefeller.
Would increase my understanding of their research if I were more knowledgeable about biology, microbiology, etcetera. But research on aerosol spraying in nature, nanotechnology, vaccines, viruses? Sounds dangerous and fishy to me. All I know is they’ve destroyed the lives of so many, these last couple of years especially.
Thanks, Celia. Doug Gabriel, who is no slouch of a researcher, has no regard for Project Veritas and this document. For your or anyone’s possible interest(?)
Doug, I listened to the first 5 minutes so far of the Gabriel's podcast. I feel strongly that they are knocking down straw men. They are getting the situation wrong from the outset, and then laughing at what they have set up as a TOO EASY target, namely O'Keefe. They are conflating perhaps legitimate beef against PV (I don't know) with the completely baseless notion that EHA is not deep with NIH and CCP since the Obama era with military "technology" developing aerosolized "vaccines," or call them "bioweapons" if you must, but not much 'bio' in it.
They are engaging in Bait and Switch.
Forget O'Keefe! He merely ran with the ball.
Do they, or do you, actually feel that all the hundreds of sources links to all this WIV bat "research" falls down the HA HA hole along with their views of O'Keefe?
Doug, please read this link and get back to me, would you?
Jan 13, 2022·edited Jan 13, 2022Liked by Celia Farber
Hi, Celia. That link produces a 264-page document on my phone (I don't read at length on my phone) and nothing on my computer but a one page chronology, and I don't have sufficient interest or time to go into the matter that far or long. I posted what I did because my friends the Gabriels are heavy into this, as you are, and are putting out their findings. They claim that most sources, including PV, are deflections--intentional or otherwise--from the real culprits--the UK Pilgrim Society--and that all this mess is sourced there. I find it very difficult to come to know the truth about almost anything, including this stuff, these days. I posted it, as I wrote, for your or anyone's "possible" interest...
There is a masking code level for active biowarfare called viral contagion.
Hence its purpose is running not from a need to promote and preserve wellbeing.
When Eugenics was banned it went 'underground' ie; it masked in other faces and fronts.
When biological warfare was banned...
When drug use was banned...
When racism was banned...
#seethepattern
Denial generates a masked reality in which suffer not only the active conflict, but in place of a truly protective relationship.
Hence generating or hyping the hateful becomes the means to access support and funding for running masked agenda under virtue signalling.
btw I've seen patents for proposed aerosolised 'vaccines' as well as read of their use on wild animals. All 'vaccines' are trojans for experimentation along with other negative synergies of toxic exposure.
Note: there are more intimate embracing perspectives than mind split to war itself. The reason to see the 'ego' is to release it as otherwise unwitting guide and protector.
I couldn't recall which link it was but I placed another important link in the piece and deleted the More Here. The characters now linked, everything flows from their social media pages for whoever is interested. And I will add more links as I find them. And so will others, I expect, here.
Celia, I'm an electrical engineer with over 3 decades of experience in the semiconductor industry. I looked into Andrew Huff's claims on Twitter. I say without malice, he is mistaken about every single thing he claimed recently (that I read) about surveillance devices. He is taking common off-the-shelf electronic items and claiming they are surveilling him. It is clear from the photos he provided that there is nothing strange, exotic or augmented about his devices. The investigator he hired is completely incompetent.
There are plenty of valid things to be concerned about. I think it is important to not follow every lead - especially those which are easy to show are false. If Huff is being surveilled then it is in ways he has not revealed in pictures on Twitter. We must not burn valuable credibility. It's hard to win & easy to lose.
Please pardon me for providing what may be old news, but this prepandemic strategic preparedness plan published by Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security addresses self-disseminating and self-amplifying vaccines (see pp 8; 47-49; 53-54).
I personally experienced some strange injury as an unvaccinated person after visiting my doctor for an annual physical. She had just been boosted. I recently started taking detoxing agents like NAC (which the FDA recalled this year) and I am beginning to recuperate now (it’s been 2 months). After learning of self-spreading vaccines and SAMs, I’m inclined to hold it out as a possibility that they have been put into use.
The headline is slightly inaccurate, the main document in Project Veritas' "drop" did not originate with D.R.A.S.T.I.C., it's a new memo that (allegedly) corroborates documents previously leaked by D.R.A.S.T.I.C. with military intelligence.
The alleged author of the memo appears to be a real person: https://www.linkedin.com/in/joseph-murphy-a243b3b3/.
If we had anything remotely resembling a free press in this country, there would be a 24-hour circus of television vans parked in front of his front door, beaming satellite signals all over the globe, demanding comment.
I read the Ecohealth Alliance proposal when the Intercept broke it. It was a tough read but the analysis and rejection letter confirmed. For goodness sakes, Glenn Beck did an entire film about it! Researchers must publish to survive. This is all documented in the journals and Celia provides some of the links. It is pointless to cast aspersions on PV or whomever for their funding. Look at the evidence and money trail. This analyst did that and had the basic understanding to interpret what he found. Logically, he tried to get military to pay attention. Looks like they didn’t (Couldn’t risk any publicity on this delicate program?) So, military brass fucked over their people to hide this ongoing research. I suspect this guy is ethical and couldn’t stand knowing his people would be subjected to myocarditis mandate and worse to no good effect. So, info was dropped. Hope he survives. Thank you Celia for confirmation. Many others are digesting this drop right now too. Material is dense and obtuse to lay people so it will take time.
Here's a follow up. I find these writers very hard to read. Would anybody else like to take a crack at understanding if this has meaning and if so, what?
https://theintercept.com/2022/01/12/covid-origins-fauci-redacted-emails/
Thank YOU Leslie, for your lucid and (I think) accurate assessment of the muddy waters that are not entirely muddy.
We must never forget that the main point about COVID-19 is that there is no new virus and it is not just one thing. It's a cover story to generate trillions of dollars and unlimited power.
I'm skeptical of every conspiracy that is presented that overlooks this fact. Like the "virus was created in Wuhan" stories. It's as if the most important thing is to make sure that the sheep and the conspiracy theorists all believe that the virus is real. It is not.
A good percentage of conspiracies are released and propagated or co-opted by agent provocateurs as another means of control. Conspiracy propaganda exists just as much as mainstream media propaganda. The best way to do this effectively is the same as all propaganda. By telling people what they want to hear. People believe what they want to believe. This is an awful human trait.
Don't give up your critical reasoning skills. They are more important now than ever before. Always search for motive to determine likeliness of truth. If there are trillions of dollars at stake, chances are 100% that they will be lying at every opportunity.
Well said. This is a critical comment. Beware of anyone who argues that a virus exists, as it simply perpetuates the lie, promotes more incessant “talk” about how to overcome it, and enables all kinds of alternative “solutions” to be offered up. The alternative solutions themselves are then incessantly debated, all to deal with what has always been in fact a non-existent problem.
The key aspect of these manufactured events is that the fake “problem” is purposely and immediately overwhelmed by the many distractions of the various “reactions” (media reports about the “virus" origin and spread) and “solutions” (imposed measures of mask wearing, social distancing, lockdowns, vaccines, vaccine mandates). It’s to get everyone off the main premise of virus existence. The ensuing debates about the efficacies of these measures in “stopping the spread of the disease,” along with questions about government overreach and subsequent revelations about whatever nefarious schemes have been conducted by those in charge, also further distract if they don’t address the fundamental premise. I would argue that all of that is intentional, designed to keep those who are ultimately incapable of ever piercing the veil (i.e., to discover that there was never any “there…there”) in a state of perpetual confusion and anxiety.
Thus, anyone who continues to say a “virus” exists, despite all the evidence to the contrary and which they seem never to address (excluding people like Tom Cowan, Andrew Kaufman, Christine Massey), just keeps the incessant talk alive. It’s very simple: there’s no problem; so no “solution” is required.
Granted, the REAL problem of illness is an entirely other matter, but it is an INDIVIDUAL matter that each of us deals with as we always have…individually (i.e., when we get sick). Real problems are always only confined to this local realm of the individual and his/her community (although I would argue, as Cowan does, that “contagion” is itself a myth). This means these problems should never be foisted on the collective body (i.e., all of humanity) because no problems are actually global in reach. Otherwise, all of us are then forced to deal with something that may only affect a few of us and then only locally.
As a side note, I always say to anybody who confronts me about not wearing a mask or being vaccinated, “I’m not sick.” (If pressed further, I'll add, “Plus, YOU’RE wearing a mask and are vaccinated, so what’s the problem?”)
So be wary of anyone who doesn’t address the basic premise of the existence of the “virus.” If they say it exists, then ask them to prove or show it, as the burden of proof is on them.
Great comment. I just wanted to highlight an extremely important point. If viruses are so damn dangerous and may kill us all, there is no way that humans would have existed this long. This planet is far, far older than recorded history. Equilibrium between viruses, bacteria and all other living things has been long established.
That is logical. I agree that contagion doesn't exist. Not by viruses anyway, though the ones pushing them might qualify.
"What am I looking at?" An aerosolized poison to spray on bats in the wild? How? Delivered by a swarm of AI-controlled, electro-mechanical humming bird -size drones mounted with atomizers? Hmmm, perhaps a 'delivery system' like that could be repurposed to deliver aerosolized Fentanyl to 'targeted' humans
What do we think of the word: "BINGO?"
I'll say it.
BINGO!!!!!
https://cdn.newspunch.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/chemtrails-madness-678x381.jpg
I'll leave it to RFK Jr and all of the Rockefeller devotees propping up the vampire, nazi medical establishment which is now feeding and experimenting on the entire human population, to 'explain' the origins of the non existent Sars CoV 2 virus. You can learn Klingon (and maybe even it's many dialects) but that doesn't mean that Klingons are real.
Someone commented about Project Veritas's funding sources on an Off Guardian entry (James Corbett interview Robert Kennedy; It was awful!) without providing links that led to information to support the idea that PV is untrustworthy. It was quite a distraction for me, but I had a quick check (which still took too much time out of my day) and found that, indeed, O'Keefe's funding sources are stinky. I am far from expert in foundations and charities but I am aware of some of the bigger bad ones. With PV, you have: Vanguard, Charles Schwab & Donald J. Trump for example. Go just a little deeper and you'll see Rockefeller.
"The Funding Of Project Veritas" / https://arrby.wordpress.com/2022/01/13/the-funding-of-project-veritas/
Would increase my understanding of their research if I were more knowledgeable about biology, microbiology, etcetera. But research on aerosol spraying in nature, nanotechnology, vaccines, viruses? Sounds dangerous and fishy to me. All I know is they’ve destroyed the lives of so many, these last couple of years especially.
Now I know what it means when someone is called completely batty.
Baric’s bragging rights 2015 with funding support acknowledged from NIH/NIAID and EcoHealth Alliance. https://www.nature.com/articles/nm0416-446d
Shows who funds EcoHealth incl DOD and NIH. From CHD https://www.independentsciencenews.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/EcoHealth-Funding-as-of-01_10_2020-Fed.-Grants-Contracts.pdf
Shows who also funds Ecohealth, Gates Foundation. https://www.gatesfoundation.org/about/committed-grants/2020/08/inv002838
Thanks, Celia. Doug Gabriel, who is no slouch of a researcher, has no regard for Project Veritas and this document. For your or anyone’s possible interest(?)
https://patriots4truth.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/Project-Veritas-Propaganda.mp3
Doug, I listened to the first 5 minutes so far of the Gabriel's podcast. I feel strongly that they are knocking down straw men. They are getting the situation wrong from the outset, and then laughing at what they have set up as a TOO EASY target, namely O'Keefe. They are conflating perhaps legitimate beef against PV (I don't know) with the completely baseless notion that EHA is not deep with NIH and CCP since the Obama era with military "technology" developing aerosolized "vaccines," or call them "bioweapons" if you must, but not much 'bio' in it.
They are engaging in Bait and Switch.
Forget O'Keefe! He merely ran with the ball.
Do they, or do you, actually feel that all the hundreds of sources links to all this WIV bat "research" falls down the HA HA hole along with their views of O'Keefe?
Doug, please read this link and get back to me, would you?
https://twitter.com/CharlesRixey/status/1481219982348677121?s=20
Hi, Celia. That link produces a 264-page document on my phone (I don't read at length on my phone) and nothing on my computer but a one page chronology, and I don't have sufficient interest or time to go into the matter that far or long. I posted what I did because my friends the Gabriels are heavy into this, as you are, and are putting out their findings. They claim that most sources, including PV, are deflections--intentional or otherwise--from the real culprits--the UK Pilgrim Society--and that all this mess is sourced there. I find it very difficult to come to know the truth about almost anything, including this stuff, these days. I posted it, as I wrote, for your or anyone's "possible" interest...
This is terrifying. What are we supposed to do about it?
There is a masking code level for active biowarfare called viral contagion.
Hence its purpose is running not from a need to promote and preserve wellbeing.
When Eugenics was banned it went 'underground' ie; it masked in other faces and fronts.
When biological warfare was banned...
When drug use was banned...
When racism was banned...
#seethepattern
Denial generates a masked reality in which suffer not only the active conflict, but in place of a truly protective relationship.
Hence generating or hyping the hateful becomes the means to access support and funding for running masked agenda under virtue signalling.
btw I've seen patents for proposed aerosolised 'vaccines' as well as read of their use on wild animals. All 'vaccines' are trojans for experimentation along with other negative synergies of toxic exposure.
Note: there are more intimate embracing perspectives than mind split to war itself. The reason to see the 'ego' is to release it as otherwise unwitting guide and protector.
The More Here link is broken...please fix. This is riveting work!
I couldn't recall which link it was but I placed another important link in the piece and deleted the More Here. The characters now linked, everything flows from their social media pages for whoever is interested. And I will add more links as I find them. And so will others, I expect, here.
This was the one I thought was in the piece.
Yes, thank you!
Thank you!
Celia, I'm an electrical engineer with over 3 decades of experience in the semiconductor industry. I looked into Andrew Huff's claims on Twitter. I say without malice, he is mistaken about every single thing he claimed recently (that I read) about surveillance devices. He is taking common off-the-shelf electronic items and claiming they are surveilling him. It is clear from the photos he provided that there is nothing strange, exotic or augmented about his devices. The investigator he hired is completely incompetent.
There are plenty of valid things to be concerned about. I think it is important to not follow every lead - especially those which are easy to show are false. If Huff is being surveilled then it is in ways he has not revealed in pictures on Twitter. We must not burn valuable credibility. It's hard to win & easy to lose.
I appreciate your articles.
You are so brilliant.
Hi Tessa! I'm SO glad you're here. <3
And I’m glad you’re both here. 🙏
Please pardon me for providing what may be old news, but this prepandemic strategic preparedness plan published by Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security addresses self-disseminating and self-amplifying vaccines (see pp 8; 47-49; 53-54).
I personally experienced some strange injury as an unvaccinated person after visiting my doctor for an annual physical. She had just been boosted. I recently started taking detoxing agents like NAC (which the FDA recalled this year) and I am beginning to recuperate now (it’s been 2 months). After learning of self-spreading vaccines and SAMs, I’m inclined to hold it out as a possibility that they have been put into use.
https://jhsphcenterforhealthsecurity.s3.amazonaws.com/181009-gcbr-tech-report.pdf
What do the acronyms DRASTIC, DEFUSE, and PREEMPT stand for?
I don't know.
The 'more here' link isn't working.
https://newsrescue.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/defuse-project-drastic-analysis-1.pdf
Thanks!
Thanks.