38 Comments

The headline is slightly inaccurate, the main document in Project Veritas' "drop" did not originate with D.R.A.S.T.I.C., it's a new memo that (allegedly) corroborates documents previously leaked by D.R.A.S.T.I.C. with military intelligence.

The alleged author of the memo appears to be a real person: https://www.linkedin.com/in/joseph-murphy-a243b3b3/.

If we had anything remotely resembling a free press in this country, there would be a 24-hour circus of television vans parked in front of his front door, beaming satellite signals all over the globe, demanding comment.

Expand full comment
Jan 13, 2022Liked by Celia Farber

I read the Ecohealth Alliance proposal when the Intercept broke it. It was a tough read but the analysis and rejection letter confirmed. For goodness sakes, Glenn Beck did an entire film about it! Researchers must publish to survive. This is all documented in the journals and Celia provides some of the links. It is pointless to cast aspersions on PV or whomever for their funding. Look at the evidence and money trail. This analyst did that and had the basic understanding to interpret what he found. Logically, he tried to get military to pay attention. Looks like they didn’t (Couldn’t risk any publicity on this delicate program?) So, military brass fucked over their people to hide this ongoing research. I suspect this guy is ethical and couldn’t stand knowing his people would be subjected to myocarditis mandate and worse to no good effect. So, info was dropped. Hope he survives. Thank you Celia for confirmation. Many others are digesting this drop right now too. Material is dense and obtuse to lay people so it will take time.

Expand full comment
Jan 13, 2022·edited Jan 13, 2022Liked by Celia Farber

We must never forget that the main point about COVID-19 is that there is no new virus and it is not just one thing. It's a cover story to generate trillions of dollars and unlimited power.

I'm skeptical of every conspiracy that is presented that overlooks this fact. Like the "virus was created in Wuhan" stories. It's as if the most important thing is to make sure that the sheep and the conspiracy theorists all believe that the virus is real. It is not.

A good percentage of conspiracies are released and propagated or co-opted by agent provocateurs as another means of control. Conspiracy propaganda exists just as much as mainstream media propaganda. The best way to do this effectively is the same as all propaganda. By telling people what they want to hear. People believe what they want to believe. This is an awful human trait.

Don't give up your critical reasoning skills. They are more important now than ever before. Always search for motive to determine likeliness of truth. If there are trillions of dollars at stake, chances are 100% that they will be lying at every opportunity.

Expand full comment
Jan 13, 2022·edited Jan 13, 2022Liked by Celia Farber

"What am I looking at?" An aerosolized poison to spray on bats in the wild? How? Delivered by a swarm of AI-controlled, electro-mechanical humming bird -size drones mounted with atomizers? Hmmm, perhaps a 'delivery system' like that could be repurposed to deliver aerosolized Fentanyl to 'targeted' humans

Expand full comment
Jan 13, 2022·edited Jan 13, 2022

I'll leave it to RFK Jr and all of the Rockefeller devotees propping up the vampire, nazi medical establishment which is now feeding and experimenting on the entire human population, to 'explain' the origins of the non existent Sars CoV 2 virus. You can learn Klingon (and maybe even it's many dialects) but that doesn't mean that Klingons are real.

Someone commented about Project Veritas's funding sources on an Off Guardian entry (James Corbett interview Robert Kennedy; It was awful!) without providing links that led to information to support the idea that PV is untrustworthy. It was quite a distraction for me, but I had a quick check (which still took too much time out of my day) and found that, indeed, O'Keefe's funding sources are stinky. I am far from expert in foundations and charities but I am aware of some of the bigger bad ones. With PV, you have: Vanguard, Charles Schwab & Donald J. Trump for example. Go just a little deeper and you'll see Rockefeller.

"The Funding Of Project Veritas" / https://arrby.wordpress.com/2022/01/13/the-funding-of-project-veritas/

Expand full comment
Jan 13, 2022Liked by Celia Farber

Would increase my understanding of their research if I were more knowledgeable about biology, microbiology, etcetera. But research on aerosol spraying in nature, nanotechnology, vaccines, viruses? Sounds dangerous and fishy to me. All I know is they’ve destroyed the lives of so many, these last couple of years especially.

Expand full comment

Now I know what it means when someone is called completely batty.

Expand full comment
Jan 14, 2022Liked by Celia Farber

Baric’s bragging rights 2015 with funding support acknowledged from NIH/NIAID and EcoHealth Alliance. https://www.nature.com/articles/nm0416-446d

Expand full comment
Jan 13, 2022Liked by Celia Farber

Thanks, Celia. Doug Gabriel, who is no slouch of a researcher, has no regard for Project Veritas and this document. For your or anyone’s possible interest(?)

https://patriots4truth.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/Project-Veritas-Propaganda.mp3

Expand full comment
Jan 13, 2022Liked by Celia Farber

There is a masking code level for active biowarfare called viral contagion.

Hence its purpose is running not from a need to promote and preserve wellbeing.

When Eugenics was banned it went 'underground' ie; it masked in other faces and fronts.

When biological warfare was banned...

When drug use was banned...

When racism was banned...

#seethepattern

Denial generates a masked reality in which suffer not only the active conflict, but in place of a truly protective relationship.

Hence generating or hyping the hateful becomes the means to access support and funding for running masked agenda under virtue signalling.

btw I've seen patents for proposed aerosolised 'vaccines' as well as read of their use on wild animals. All 'vaccines' are trojans for experimentation along with other negative synergies of toxic exposure.

Note: there are more intimate embracing perspectives than mind split to war itself. The reason to see the 'ego' is to release it as otherwise unwitting guide and protector.

Expand full comment

The More Here link is broken...please fix. This is riveting work!

Expand full comment
Jan 14, 2022·edited Jan 14, 2022

Celia, I'm an electrical engineer with over 3 decades of experience in the semiconductor industry. I looked into Andrew Huff's claims on Twitter. I say without malice, he is mistaken about every single thing he claimed recently (that I read) about surveillance devices. He is taking common off-the-shelf electronic items and claiming they are surveilling him. It is clear from the photos he provided that there is nothing strange, exotic or augmented about his devices. The investigator he hired is completely incompetent.

There are plenty of valid things to be concerned about. I think it is important to not follow every lead - especially those which are easy to show are false. If Huff is being surveilled then it is in ways he has not revealed in pictures on Twitter. We must not burn valuable credibility. It's hard to win & easy to lose.

I appreciate your articles.

Expand full comment

You are so brilliant.

Expand full comment
founding

Sharing a different but important take on this whole story by Project Veritas, and one I've yet to hear from anyone else (besides the person I reference below, although I may be wrong):

Could this "big story" be just another *distraction* from the *real issue at hand* that the MSM, fed health agencies, WH, Congress et alia dare not focus on beyond passing, dismissive mention, specifically:

>>The massive and still-rising deaths, disabilities and serious injuries from the CV shots.<<

If viewed in this way, I'm afraid that PV is just helping the PTB continue to conceal the most pressing and distressing FACTS about the CV shots. Wittingly or not--I don't know. I pray its unwittingly so. Too many are falling off my Trust shelf as the days go by.

I think I understand now why the PV story turned out to be so underwhelming, even with my cautionary, pre-lowered expectations.

(I can't take credit for this insight: the brilliant Diana West just mentioned it in her latest video blog.)

Expand full comment

Please pardon me for providing what may be old news, but this prepandemic strategic preparedness plan published by Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security addresses self-disseminating and self-amplifying vaccines (see pp 8; 47-49; 53-54).

I personally experienced some strange injury as an unvaccinated person after visiting my doctor for an annual physical. She had just been boosted. I recently started taking detoxing agents like NAC (which the FDA recalled this year) and I am beginning to recuperate now (it’s been 2 months). After learning of self-spreading vaccines and SAMs, I’m inclined to hold it out as a possibility that they have been put into use.

https://jhsphcenterforhealthsecurity.s3.amazonaws.com/181009-gcbr-tech-report.pdf

Expand full comment
Jan 13, 2022·edited Jan 13, 2022

What do the acronyms DRASTIC, DEFUSE, and PREEMPT stand for?

Expand full comment