"...if we say that being a woman has nothing to do with having female biology, as is required by accepting that transwomen are women, then there are three unattractive options: (1) being a woman is essentially tied to traditional social stereotypes of what being a woman involves; (2) there is no difference between women or men, or a large number of people are both or neither; or, (3) it is impossible to tell whether someone is a woman or not. None of these three options is a workable definition of ‘woman’ and yet, if we remove external checks on which male-bodied people are permitted to apply for a Gender Recognition Certificate and thereby legally become women under a new version of the UK Gender Recognition Act, the law will be committed to at least one of these three options. As a philosopher, I find it profoundly worrying that the law could be based on such an incoherent definition; at the very least, the application process for a Gender Recognition Certificate should retain the requirement for medical and/or legal approval to lend some credence to the process, although there are problems even with this option.
These definitional difficulties disappear if we admit biological sex as a determining factor of whether someone is a woman.”
Sophie Allen, “If Transwomen Are Women, What is A Woman?"
However, a group of women in England were convicted of hate speech for posting pink, penis-shaped posters that said, "Women don't have penises". And they were called "Terfs"--trans-excluding radical feminists.
This where the philosophy of “go along to get along” gets you: madness running rampant in society. At every point along the path that led us to this moment, we knew we were going off the rails. But we wouldn’t push back, for fear of appearing intolerant of anyone or anything not just like us. “How small minded you are.” And here we are now, in a world of OUR making, our responsibility because we watched it happen and fooled ourselves into believing this would not be the result.
This is evil and “the only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing.”
Exactly! This is just what happens when lunatic delusional psychopaths are permitted to gain undue power and influence; not having that defining empathetic connection with humanity and other life that defines the condition, they don't and cannot have real contact with - or respect for - reality.
Empathy enables ethics, which enables conscience and the ability to want/learn not to repeat things that may adversely affect others, which enables the capacity to view the rights and needs of others as matters of importance, a combination which forms essential species survival characteristics naturally triggered in the human-normal brain.
And that's what's missing - potentially for any of a number of reasons - in the damaged/dysfunctional area of the psychopathic brain. It's not a 'fault' thing, but a dangerous brain/mental defect which human-normals have to learn to recognise in individuals by their responses, their actions and the results of such actions. Because those without empathy and ethics can never be trusted with any power over anyone or anything.
All they can seemingly see are their own desires and any means of attaining those, at all cost to others. The rest of Life seems to be viewed, in their limited perceptions, to be nothing more than objects that are either potentially useful to themselves or not - and therefore essentially disposable.
Wherever the psychopathic control, reality itself, and all else, including even such as basic biology and science as a method of attempting to gain understanding of how things really work, then follow, in being eagerly flung out of the Overton window - and here, being used in 'perception management'.
If they can get you to believe in absurdities, they can get you to accept/enact atrocities.
Same old, same old playbook, as when humanity said 'Never Again!!', not so very long ago...
But people can and do change back. I remember a dear friend, early on in this, telling me proudly that she'd torn a strip from some poor guy in a grocery store - in front of his child that she'd thought she was protecting - for not wearing a mask.
I was aghast, partly that she'd do anything that rude in verbally assaulting a stranger, which was very unlike her - in front of a child, too - thought I must have misheard and, after the first horrified 'you didn't!' and her explanation of what she thought was a good thing to do, asked such as whether she realised that masks were worse than useless for such situations, although she merely thought I was nuts. It took time - and her own investigation.
Same with the geoengineering, of which she then knew nothing, which took even longer.
I have no idea if she ever bothered with anything on that I'd sent her on that, from time to time, but she only recently (after years of my mentioning/sending things on this, now and then,) said in front of me that she'd thought I was nuts but now she can see it happening - mentally see it, not just overlooking the evidence as something in the sky that she'd never thought about.
This is an awesome and intelligent person on a slightly more restricted track of alternative news/information. But now everyone has had years to realise - at the least - that something's very, very wrong, and it seems that most do. Or are at least sick of their publicly paid public servants treating them like slaves.
There was a lot available on the internet, back in the day, that I used to snicker at in passing, and had I not ever finally paused at that first example for what I thought would be a laugh to discover that there was evidence for that one and that it explained something I'd been wondering about, to keep looking in the fading hope it wasn't true, only to find more evidence, I'd never have checked out other things and would have missed SO much... how many millions of others have done the same?
And how many others are belatedly doing that now? Apparently enough to have searches even more badly scrambled - but where there's curiosity, a way will be found.
Yes. Painting real women out of the picture. Do you think the vast majority of real men will be happy with that? Why do people believe < 2% of people should rule the other 98%? And why should we let them?
So true. It tells us exactly who matters. That may explain why in my daughter's college, her friends all identify as something other than straight females. They want to matter.
The current Trans Op checks off so many boxes for the unraveling of society. It forces us to deny physical reality, to deny what we see with our eyes, to knowingly endanger our daughters against our best instincts, to utter bizarre statements (like "my pronouns are..."), to acclimate to absurd loyalty rituals, to talk about creepy things with children, to drive a wedge between families, to put people on a pronoun-to-surgery pipeline and create permanent medical patient$, to sterilize the youth, to channel nonconformist impulses into endless silly 'identities.' I could go on and on. These are skill sets that the overlords are developing in the populace.
The art world is taken and held by this ideology now, which has thrown me for such a loop, being honest and vocal about it, that I might not ever do another show. That could be devastating. Not sure yet, still working, slowly, but the intention of going through everything required for exhibition is gone, at least for now.
I've lost respect for my peer group, and the grief is immense. Women in every discipline who slugged through the trenches to validate our voices have embraced this latest new thing with gusto, validating the cartoon characters pretending to be girly as heroic. Breaks my heart.
Thank you for asking. Although multidisciplinary, I have been working on what was to be a public installation sculpture. The Observer Effect is the working title, from the physics theory that we alter matter with attention, and in social sciences that we change our behaviour under surveillance. Very confused about that now, and playing with materials in the hope of deciding what to next. The rug being pulled out from under us is a distraction, and I'm working with the idea of perceptual filters while wondering if the floor will be hauled away next. I've done performance and theatre work in the past, costume, painting... It's all the same thing, really. Thanks again.
I can’t recall where I read this (not my original idea), but the media/PTB are hell bent on invoking extreme states of fragmentation in order to “build back” the pieces in a so-called more truthful way without the cultural blinders of the past. “The new manufactured framework is debilitating cynicism in order to enslave the population.” If we accept this manufactured framework as reality, no one will lift a finger in challenging it.
They must destroy the present system before 6uilding 6ack 6etter. Divide, confuse, chaos. Hegelian Dialect-problem, reaction, solution. We're in the "reaction" stage. The "solution"? Revelation 13
Thank you Celia. It's better for a vulnerable, abused woman prisoner to be raped by her cellmate; a 'woman' with a penis, a case that no lawyer wants to go anywhere near than for her cellmate to be devastated by not being allowed in a woman's prison.
The point I'm trying to make is a bit like a group of men gathering to discuss issues around menstruation and pelvic pain, vaginal dryness and menopause, childlessness, motherhood, the sisterhood, the male gaze or the female orgasm- only a woman can know.
It's the actual voices of actual women that must be heard- and we must start speaking a hell of a lot louder about what we do and don't want.
🙏🏽
I like the sound of the those models- when we did sex education the girls were paraded to learn how to use the incinerator in the ladies and then we were shown some buttocks on the front of magazine by the headmaster, who wore a toupee, who said it's not possible to tell if this is a man or a woman????
I hope so but since only maybe 1% of news gets disseminated by msm I hear woke say things like “yes extremes bad but super rare” so again they wave off wrong as irrelevant and not their responsibility.
Thank you for this article. I did watch a video yesterday of Ms. Ardern walking down a hall with text over lay saying her appearance proved she was really a man. I was shocked. These people are twisted. And I still have not recovered from the insult of a Congressional appointee refusing to define a woman, when she was one. I'm a woman with no patience for someone saying I'm not. Now I favor equal opportunity, I want to see men declared to not be men. Too many horror movies?
Their insane ravings are, in a word, tiresome - like the buffoonery of a half-wit. I wonder who writes their scripts. I would think they could do better. Also, their sanctimony is a reflection on them, not on normal people.
Regarding the church scene, I agree about the so-called church goer not being fluent in the cultural, physical "vernacular." (I know I am using a wrong word, but you know what I mean.). AND "POTUS" looks plastic. Really, don't you think so? Or like someone is wearing a cheap imitation-style mask. The gestures of JB look practiced, imitative as well. He is not there at all. Such a farce from my POV. The man-woman is just beyond wprds, regarding his predicament. (For some reason, I am recalling JK Rowling's reactions to this kind of lament, too, with different lens compared to when I was living the Northern CA matrix. I moved from CA recently for a reason. Nothing made sense to me there any longer!)
I actually thought that Biden (real or fake) didn't look any more fake -- or phony/insincere -- than everyone else in the clip. And compared to whatever in the first clip, he looked practically human.
The compensation: Official victims don't last long. The media and elites run through victim classes fast now. They toss aside last season's victims after the victims have learned to DEPEND on media approval.
It's better to stand back from the churning, and learn to live without approval.
I don't get the Biden clip. Did he say he went to a black church when he was a kid, or something? (I don't listen to anything he says.) Better yet, the black man next to him acted as though he'd never been to a black church. The only people that were acting as though they were enjoying anything were the people in the choir.
Thank-you, Grammy. Other than little clips here, on Substack, I really do not listen to anything he says. It's normally too incoherent, or outright lies about "Cornpop" or some other BS, and my blood pressure just does not need to be any higher.
I totally understand. I listen to one radio talk show, "The Markley, Van Camp and Robbins Show", they cover current events. It's where I hear most of the "Biden" gaffs. They are quite funny, humor helps sometimes.
There is no such thing as a transsexual.
Men who have cosmetic surgery and wear dresses are transvestites.
"...if we say that being a woman has nothing to do with having female biology, as is required by accepting that transwomen are women, then there are three unattractive options: (1) being a woman is essentially tied to traditional social stereotypes of what being a woman involves; (2) there is no difference between women or men, or a large number of people are both or neither; or, (3) it is impossible to tell whether someone is a woman or not. None of these three options is a workable definition of ‘woman’ and yet, if we remove external checks on which male-bodied people are permitted to apply for a Gender Recognition Certificate and thereby legally become women under a new version of the UK Gender Recognition Act, the law will be committed to at least one of these three options. As a philosopher, I find it profoundly worrying that the law could be based on such an incoherent definition; at the very least, the application process for a Gender Recognition Certificate should retain the requirement for medical and/or legal approval to lend some credence to the process, although there are problems even with this option.
These definitional difficulties disappear if we admit biological sex as a determining factor of whether someone is a woman.”
Sophie Allen, “If Transwomen Are Women, What is A Woman?"
Yeah, there's no legal definition of "hate speech" either....
Maybe not.
However, a group of women in England were convicted of hate speech for posting pink, penis-shaped posters that said, "Women don't have penises". And they were called "Terfs"--trans-excluding radical feminists.
It's like anything else, they make it up as they go along.
Apt illustration of the unreal projections have real impact like in the Bradbury story Celia excerpted here
This where the philosophy of “go along to get along” gets you: madness running rampant in society. At every point along the path that led us to this moment, we knew we were going off the rails. But we wouldn’t push back, for fear of appearing intolerant of anyone or anything not just like us. “How small minded you are.” And here we are now, in a world of OUR making, our responsibility because we watched it happen and fooled ourselves into believing this would not be the result.
This is evil and “the only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing.”
That was a great deep dive explanation of the whole solid situation. What happened to all the feminist who shrieked about mysoginy?
Exactly! This is just what happens when lunatic delusional psychopaths are permitted to gain undue power and influence; not having that defining empathetic connection with humanity and other life that defines the condition, they don't and cannot have real contact with - or respect for - reality.
Empathy enables ethics, which enables conscience and the ability to want/learn not to repeat things that may adversely affect others, which enables the capacity to view the rights and needs of others as matters of importance, a combination which forms essential species survival characteristics naturally triggered in the human-normal brain.
And that's what's missing - potentially for any of a number of reasons - in the damaged/dysfunctional area of the psychopathic brain. It's not a 'fault' thing, but a dangerous brain/mental defect which human-normals have to learn to recognise in individuals by their responses, their actions and the results of such actions. Because those without empathy and ethics can never be trusted with any power over anyone or anything.
All they can seemingly see are their own desires and any means of attaining those, at all cost to others. The rest of Life seems to be viewed, in their limited perceptions, to be nothing more than objects that are either potentially useful to themselves or not - and therefore essentially disposable.
Wherever the psychopathic control, reality itself, and all else, including even such as basic biology and science as a method of attempting to gain understanding of how things really work, then follow, in being eagerly flung out of the Overton window - and here, being used in 'perception management'.
If they can get you to believe in absurdities, they can get you to accept/enact atrocities.
Same old, same old playbook, as when humanity said 'Never Again!!', not so very long ago...
But people can and do change back. I remember a dear friend, early on in this, telling me proudly that she'd torn a strip from some poor guy in a grocery store - in front of his child that she'd thought she was protecting - for not wearing a mask.
I was aghast, partly that she'd do anything that rude in verbally assaulting a stranger, which was very unlike her - in front of a child, too - thought I must have misheard and, after the first horrified 'you didn't!' and her explanation of what she thought was a good thing to do, asked such as whether she realised that masks were worse than useless for such situations, although she merely thought I was nuts. It took time - and her own investigation.
Same with the geoengineering, of which she then knew nothing, which took even longer.
I have no idea if she ever bothered with anything on that I'd sent her on that, from time to time, but she only recently (after years of my mentioning/sending things on this, now and then,) said in front of me that she'd thought I was nuts but now she can see it happening - mentally see it, not just overlooking the evidence as something in the sky that she'd never thought about.
This is an awesome and intelligent person on a slightly more restricted track of alternative news/information. But now everyone has had years to realise - at the least - that something's very, very wrong, and it seems that most do. Or are at least sick of their publicly paid public servants treating them like slaves.
There was a lot available on the internet, back in the day, that I used to snicker at in passing, and had I not ever finally paused at that first example for what I thought would be a laugh to discover that there was evidence for that one and that it explained something I'd been wondering about, to keep looking in the fading hope it wasn't true, only to find more evidence, I'd never have checked out other things and would have missed SO much... how many millions of others have done the same?
And how many others are belatedly doing that now? Apparently enough to have searches even more badly scrambled - but where there's curiosity, a way will be found.
https://www.bobmoran.co.uk/other-work/modern-art-original-artwork
Yes. Painting real women out of the picture. Do you think the vast majority of real men will be happy with that? Why do people believe < 2% of people should rule the other 98%? And why should we let them?
I donthink I've ever seen artwork like this. Wow!
Bob Moran's cartoons are quite impressive:
https://www.google.com/search?client=safari&rls=en&sxsrf=AJOqlzUcM1Oay9MgIlPNC9tecUujA4uvjg:1674252058539&q=cartoons+by+bob+moran&tbm=isch&source=univ&fir=qfzBMRBglHDt3M%252C6gPCz1Z6k_rsTM%252C_%253Bm98hRRNY2Q9xzM%252CeVVAYXHjRXkMrM%252C_%253BpyV7mp1M_AW89M%252C6gPCz1Z6k_rsTM%252C_%253B02wXOfRWAeIw4M%252CkBbNtuTf-PBAjM%252C_%253BoiAdxtTrsPDa_M%252Chrnv5m7q_0b58M%252C_%253BQLIIU8T3mvwX6M%252CkBbNtuTf-PBAjM%252C_%253B45MbvwrQmxRo6M%252CXzaHoc5xDpoZfM%252C_%253BI1hnLudIYd_D4M%252C0o8AnBc2ODv8HM%252C_%253BuCxKz245MVusgM%252C6gPCz1Z6k_rsTM%252C_%253BEvtoi_phnZkciM%252CTVG1cHNYJruswM%252C_%253BtO93LaEGomjBrM%252CvNYDYeQ_hh3clM%252C_%253B2z8ZCOPORG5klM%252CbNMV_-f2sAsv0M%252C_%253Bf3IWoClIDfBMaM%252C6gPCz1Z6k_rsTM%252C_%253BItuSEFIhgqthQM%252CkBbNtuTf-PBAjM%252C_&usg=AI4_-kRDZ3yx6NoUgXcLNZSrVNYmFH48fg&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiTtNr5ktf8AhXpKlkFHdleDDwQjJkEegQIDRAC&biw=1120&bih=841&dpr=2
WOW! And thank-you! Don't think I'd ever even heard of Bob Moran or seen any of his cartoons before - he's amazing!
https://jermwarfare.com/podcast/bob-moran
See also link provided by Cosmos Agent Roger 23--below
Lol, have some more thanks!
https://odysee.com/@TheAgeofAquariusPI4PSI:a/Bob---Brilliantly-Difficult:6
And thank-you to you!
There is a great documentary about the great Bob Moran.
https://odysee.com/@TheAgeofAquariusPI4PSI:a/Bob---Brilliantly-Difficult:6
Thank you for this!
Also thank-you to you!
Medical transvestite?
So true. It tells us exactly who matters. That may explain why in my daughter's college, her friends all identify as something other than straight females. They want to matter.
The current Trans Op checks off so many boxes for the unraveling of society. It forces us to deny physical reality, to deny what we see with our eyes, to knowingly endanger our daughters against our best instincts, to utter bizarre statements (like "my pronouns are..."), to acclimate to absurd loyalty rituals, to talk about creepy things with children, to drive a wedge between families, to put people on a pronoun-to-surgery pipeline and create permanent medical patient$, to sterilize the youth, to channel nonconformist impulses into endless silly 'identities.' I could go on and on. These are skill sets that the overlords are developing in the populace.
Well said.
Yes - the absurdity of it, and the implicit degradation in having to defend your very being, is the point. That's what they enjoy.
The art world is taken and held by this ideology now, which has thrown me for such a loop, being honest and vocal about it, that I might not ever do another show. That could be devastating. Not sure yet, still working, slowly, but the intention of going through everything required for exhibition is gone, at least for now.
I've lost respect for my peer group, and the grief is immense. Women in every discipline who slugged through the trenches to validate our voices have embraced this latest new thing with gusto, validating the cartoon characters pretending to be girly as heroic. Breaks my heart.
If I can ask, what sort of art do you do?
Thank you for asking. Although multidisciplinary, I have been working on what was to be a public installation sculpture. The Observer Effect is the working title, from the physics theory that we alter matter with attention, and in social sciences that we change our behaviour under surveillance. Very confused about that now, and playing with materials in the hope of deciding what to next. The rug being pulled out from under us is a distraction, and I'm working with the idea of perceptual filters while wondering if the floor will be hauled away next. I've done performance and theatre work in the past, costume, painting... It's all the same thing, really. Thanks again.
Fascinating. I hope you're able to get back on track soon. ❤️
I can’t recall where I read this (not my original idea), but the media/PTB are hell bent on invoking extreme states of fragmentation in order to “build back” the pieces in a so-called more truthful way without the cultural blinders of the past. “The new manufactured framework is debilitating cynicism in order to enslave the population.” If we accept this manufactured framework as reality, no one will lift a finger in challenging it.
They must destroy the present system before 6uilding 6ack 6etter. Divide, confuse, chaos. Hegelian Dialect-problem, reaction, solution. We're in the "reaction" stage. The "solution"? Revelation 13
Thank you Celia. It's better for a vulnerable, abused woman prisoner to be raped by her cellmate; a 'woman' with a penis, a case that no lawyer wants to go anywhere near than for her cellmate to be devastated by not being allowed in a woman's prison.
I think the tide is turning on this but it will only be achieved by women of all politics standing up to it and being heard.
Thank you gentlemen for all your support on our behalf but I think this is something women have to do.
We do not want to be ogled in changing rooms or gyms, or heaven forbid incarcerated with known sexual abusers.
We are entitled to a society that protects women only spaces.
Jo
🐒
Mostly agree.
But we men have mothers, sisters, friends, and lovers who are affected by the ludicrous claim that men can be women.
When I taught science, I used two model kits to teach about human anatomy:
The Visible Man and The Visible Women.
I wonder whether these transparent models are still available.
Some people need to see them.
yes of course absolutely.
The point I'm trying to make is a bit like a group of men gathering to discuss issues around menstruation and pelvic pain, vaginal dryness and menopause, childlessness, motherhood, the sisterhood, the male gaze or the female orgasm- only a woman can know.
It's the actual voices of actual women that must be heard- and we must start speaking a hell of a lot louder about what we do and don't want.
🙏🏽
I like the sound of the those models- when we did sex education the girls were paraded to learn how to use the incinerator in the ladies and then we were shown some buttocks on the front of magazine by the headmaster, who wore a toupee, who said it's not possible to tell if this is a man or a woman????
I hope so but since only maybe 1% of news gets disseminated by msm I hear woke say things like “yes extremes bad but super rare” so again they wave off wrong as irrelevant and not their responsibility.
Thank you for this article. I did watch a video yesterday of Ms. Ardern walking down a hall with text over lay saying her appearance proved she was really a man. I was shocked. These people are twisted. And I still have not recovered from the insult of a Congressional appointee refusing to define a woman, when she was one. I'm a woman with no patience for someone saying I'm not. Now I favor equal opportunity, I want to see men declared to not be men. Too many horror movies?
Their insane ravings are, in a word, tiresome - like the buffoonery of a half-wit. I wonder who writes their scripts. I would think they could do better. Also, their sanctimony is a reflection on them, not on normal people.
Regarding the church scene, I agree about the so-called church goer not being fluent in the cultural, physical "vernacular." (I know I am using a wrong word, but you know what I mean.). AND "POTUS" looks plastic. Really, don't you think so? Or like someone is wearing a cheap imitation-style mask. The gestures of JB look practiced, imitative as well. He is not there at all. Such a farce from my POV. The man-woman is just beyond wprds, regarding his predicament. (For some reason, I am recalling JK Rowling's reactions to this kind of lament, too, with different lens compared to when I was living the Northern CA matrix. I moved from CA recently for a reason. Nothing made sense to me there any longer!)
I actually thought that Biden (real or fake) didn't look any more fake -- or phony/insincere -- than everyone else in the clip. And compared to whatever in the first clip, he looked practically human.
The compensation: Official victims don't last long. The media and elites run through victim classes fast now. They toss aside last season's victims after the victims have learned to DEPEND on media approval.
It's better to stand back from the churning, and learn to live without approval.
They should be called "Whoa-Man"!
Or Woe-man.
"Woe to those who call evil good and good evil;
Who put darkness for light, and light for darkness;
Who put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!
Woe to those who are wise in their own eyes,
And prudent in their own sight!" Isaiah 5:20....
That guy in the final clip doesn’t even look like Biden
I thought that, too.
Definitely not Senator Biden or even VP Biden, that's for certain.
Trauma/Drama/ = Delusion ...that their warped views matter & they are standing for actual TRUTH.
Vince McMahon of pro wrestlings WWF wouldn't even go this far.
And the other clip?
Biden now has the skin of an eight year old on the close to dead frame of Nosferatu.
I don't get the Biden clip. Did he say he went to a black church when he was a kid, or something? (I don't listen to anything he says.) Better yet, the black man next to him acted as though he'd never been to a black church. The only people that were acting as though they were enjoying anything were the people in the choir.
Yes, he's said he went to a black church growing up.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/biden-repeats-questionable-claim-he-went-to-a-black-church-every-morning-in-1960s/ar-AA16oYfV
Thank-you, Grammy. Other than little clips here, on Substack, I really do not listen to anything he says. It's normally too incoherent, or outright lies about "Cornpop" or some other BS, and my blood pressure just does not need to be any higher.
I totally understand. I listen to one radio talk show, "The Markley, Van Camp and Robbins Show", they cover current events. It's where I hear most of the "Biden" gaffs. They are quite funny, humor helps sometimes.
"What should we call it?"
I call it dogshit. Maybe because it's almost unavoidable and it is hard to wipe it off your shoes.