Waltz Of The Sugarplum Gatekeepers: The New York Times, The Guardian, Le Monde, El Pais, Der Spiegel Call For JULIAN ASSANGE to be Released
Citing the Sanctity Of A Free Press
Read about it here.
It goes without saying that we pray Assange is released. But let’s not be fools.
Why are they doing this?
Have they altered him such that his mind no longer would perceive/react as himself, as he was before they began their attack? I would assume so.
I read his PTSD medical report around 2016 and even then he said, “I can’t think properly.”
Psy Op School And See Through Goggles
My guess on this op is likely correct, also not a complex or tough one:
These legacy media corporations, all of whom threw Assange to all wolves, (after they published, exploited, and gained from what Wikileaks had) never called for anybody anywhere to be fair to him. Not even for Sweden to clarify he never even was formally charged with any crime in Sweden and did not rape anybody, but rather, was reluctant to take an “HIV” test in Stockholm on a Saturday in Stockholm after a night with a woman who had a phobia of seminal fluid and had never been in contact with it. (From 98 page Swedish police report.)
Why now, then?
This is my theory:
Q: What does a narcissistic entity care about?
What does it look, for them, like if Assange dies, is martyred, in Belmarsh prison?
They like to disable critical truth seekers, for a decade or so. Cat and mouse, torment, torture, humiliation, imprisonment—all these people played direct roles in all of it. Including by their very very long silences.
So they call for Assange’s release now; He is no doubt barely there anymore, and they can have done absolutely anything they wanted to his mind, in Belmarsh, (and at that Ecuadorian embassy in London.)
Assange, (what’s left of him) won’t “break” or “drop” anything further; They get to look like heroes, even though they are complicit with his destroyers. And they get to look like they care about press freedom.
They didn’t want another Gary Webb situation.