What Did I Mean By "Virus Communism?"
I spent over three decades alongside hundreds of others worldwide, thousands in fact, in a war against the repressive nature of Single Deadly Virus Theory, in our case, “HIV.”
It displaced barbed wire, a Berlin Wall, gulags, and all physical forms of totalitarianism and replaced them all in one fell swoop with an interior prison. Revolutionary “woke” brand new and wholly uncharted and unproven Lysenkoist “science” now jailed people by way of an antibody test that stopped them from living or being free to live. Free to love, procreate, aspire, breast-feed, or live without a ticking clock of doom allegedly in their blood.
All against all.
In 2020, the big one: Covid. “SARS cov-2,” an entirely synthetic thing generated by genetic sequences in trans-national computers.
And what did it do?
Did it not:
Terminate all previous rights to life previously thought to be “western?” Including:
—The right to free assembly
—The right to free travel
—The right to bodily autonomy
—The right to express dissent, freedom of speech
—The right to work, to breathe, to allow children to breathe, the right of children to go to school
—The right to run a business
—The right to worship
—The right to refuse federally ordained injections, despite no proof of safety, and abundant proof of damage and death
Did it not:
—Render life colorless, joyless, hopeless?
—Turn neighbor against neighbor and child against parent?
—Induce cult-ish obedience, shame the dissenters, demand worship of a spectral idol, and insult God?
—-Encourage surveillance and espionage, as well as public shaming and professional liquidation?
—-Create a direct line between government blacklists, based on Covid opinion, social media, employers, and more with tentacles reaching into every formerly free realm of human life? (The Twitter files revealed all this.)
—Normalize the notion of prison camps (gulags) for the disobedient?
Is it really a stretch that I coined the term “virus communism?”
Does it not aim to liquidate millions of us, and finally, usher us into social credit scores, a Central Bank Digital Currency system that controls every aspect of our lives based on our allegiance to the state doctrine of “Covid?”
I could call it “Virus fascism.” It certainly draws its lifeblood from eugenics, de-population, technocracy, and 1984 end stage tyranny.
Are fascism and communism not kissing cousins? Am I defaming “communism” and giving “fascism” a pass?
Why do people get protective and defensive about this word “communism?”
The spiritual attack is very similar to communism, with strong elements of fascism—what difference does it make? The point is that “virus” is the new pretext and pretense for every imaginable form of oppression.
HIV/AIDS was not a disease, not a struggle against a disease—it was a revolution one was meant to surrender one’s mind, body and soul to.
Covid was the finale.
Those who are seeking resolution within the “science” and the documentation of no pathogen miss the essence of “revolutionary communism” and revolutionary fascism.
“Virus” is the new way to put humanity under the boot Orwell warned about in 1984.
Peter Duesberg always referred to the NIH as “the Reich” and Fauci as “the Fuhrer.”
He grew up in Nazi Germany, as a child.
So how can I ‘respect’ the socialists here, who say I disrespect them?
I grew up in a socialist country. Americans are finally experiencing The Boot.
“Now I will tell you the answer to my question. It is this. The Party seeks power entirely for its own sake. We are not interested in the good of others; we are interested solely in power, pure power. What pure power means you will understand presently. We are different from the oligarchies of the past in that we know what we are doing. All the others, even those who resembled ourselves, were cowards and hypocrites. The German Nazis and the Russian Communists came very close to us in their methods, but they never had the courage to recognize their own motives. They pretended, perhaps they even believed, that they had seized power unwillingly and for a limited time, and that just around the corner there lay a paradise where human beings would be free and equal. We are not like that. We know that no one ever seizes power with the intention of relinquishing it. Power is not a means; it is an end. One does not establish a dictatorship in order to safeguard a revolution; one makes the revolution in order to establish the dictatorship. The object of persecution is persecution. The object of torture is torture. The object of power is power. Now you begin to understand me.”
― George Orwell, 1984
Amazing, Celia. You are right to cast your net widely over all these various isms. What they offer is one version or another of the same boot. They all promise a future salvation in exchange for some "temporary" enslavement, torture, and murder in the now. The end justifies the means. This should tell us that ideology itself is a delusion, a mental disease, and an evil. Heaven cannot be brought about by introducing more hell, and we are foolish to fall for any such promise, regardless of the ism it is cloaked in.
I have a teenage son.
I have not seen "1984" in any school book lists for him, or for other people's kids for easy over a decade now.
I almost think it has been black listed for schools, on the quiet, hush hush, wink wink.
It was compulsory reading in year 7 for me in the 80-90s era. So in NSW, Aus, most 13-14 year olds had read it, and knew what "Big Brother" and "more equal" meant.
Nowadays I drop a "more equal" comment and early 20 year olds give me a blank expression, like they do not understand the quote, or the reference I am making.
I wonder how many copies of that book resides in Public Libraries nowadays?