Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Rob (c137)'s avatar

What bio weapon? Hehe

https://denisrancourt.substack.com/p/there-was-no-pandemic

Of course, this cannot be said, even if it's the absolute truth.

Why? Because so many people don't want to hear that the sacrifices and fear they felt was all for a big lie.

I hope that RFK Jr's strategy of leaking truth and getting press for each step forward will work.

Relevant quote

"And then there is the psychological effect of the Big Lie which is axiomatic in gaslighting. The paradox here is that the bigger the lie, the harder it is for the mind to bridge the gulf between perceived reality and the lie that authority figures are painting as truth. I believe that the prospect of being deceived evinces a primitive emotional response on a par with staring death in the face. We are hard-wired to fear deception because we have evolved to interpret it as an existential threat. That’s why deception can elicit the same emotional response as the miscalculation of a serious physical threat. Lies told to us don’t always bear the same cost as a misjudged red light, but the primitive part of the brain can’t make this distinction and we rely on cerebral mediation for a more appropriate but delayed response. And in the long run, the lie is often just as dangerous as the physical threat. Many government whoppers – ‘safe and effective’ – do cost lives.

To avoid the death-like experience of being deceived, a mental defence is erected to deny that the lie is happening."

(From https://leftlockdownsceptics.com/alleged-cia-involvement-in-jfk-assassination-goes-mainstream-so-now-what/ )

Expand full comment
el Gallinazo's avatar

There has never been a novel virus. There are 3 types of false flags: ones involving real violence and loss of life, ones that are 100% hoaxes with no loss of life, and hybrids designed to confuse alternative analysts. 9/11 and the JFK murder are an example of the first, Sandy Hook and the Gulf of Tonkin incident of the second, and the Las Vegas Massacre of the hybrid variety. The covid-1984 scamdemic has been by far the greatest false flag in human history. The basis of it was 100% hoax, though as result millions died and are still dying as a result of the hoax; There was no novel virus either as a love child between a bat and a pangolin or a deliberate or inadvertent “lab release” by the CCP Wuhan lab. It has been a fiction from beginning to end: the novel virus, the fake rt-PCR and antigen tests, the variant BS, and any novel disease. All 100% dogshit. The conservatives, in their arrogance, have been railroaded into the backup “look a squirrel” distraction of the lab leak theory. Much sound and fury signifying nothing.

But don’t take this dirty bird’s opinion. Rather read this fairly recent article by Mike Yeadon, a former VP and Chief Scientist of Pfizer’s allergy and respiratory disease division. He has become a reluctant hero of the anti-scamdemic movement.

https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/why-i-dont-believe-there-ever-was-a-covid-virus/

So let’s skip to RFK Jr. I have been following him for years and subscribe to his CHD newsletter. I read his Fauci book and was very impressed by his research abilities and his understanding of real medical science. I also regard him of all the realistic candidates for POTUS as the most positive. That said, he should not be given a free pass. His understanding of THE SCIENCE should allow him to know that the whole thing was a hoax and that the scamdemic was a fraud built up brick by brick. The studies he cited were based on research of a false premise that covid-1984 has actually existed other than in the minds of deluded and/or compromised virologists and much of the world population. So one should consider then why he has adopted this position. Is it political expediency (as Mark Twain famously said, It is easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled) or something darker. Same thing goes for the related agenda of "climate change.” He has backed off from his embrace of it whole hog to saying that it is real but we have more pressing problems. I suspect this change was due partly over the past two years by the subscribing commenters to CHD mocking the once frequent positive articles on climate change.

Expand full comment
80 more comments...

No posts