When The Anti-Semitism Guns Fail, What Do You Have Left, Bully Media? Ask Not What Your Country Can Do For You But How You Can Help Sink Your Country By Way Of Cheap Shot Accusations
The American Media Class' Dark Art Of Gotcha Finds Formidable Foe In RFK Jr.
"Ultimately, the success of this venture is in God’s hands, and the only thing I have control over is the little piece of real estate inside of my own shoes," he said. "My biggest objective is to end this process with my integrity intact. My second objective is to get elected president of the United States."
—Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
Over the weekend, I wrestled with the RFK Jr. “antisemitism” story. I felt I was breathing re-circulated airplane air, became weary, and never published what I wrote. (But he was accurate! Here’s the paper! Here’s another one!)
(Moments ago, I did publish it, after all, so you can see the evidence.)
But the reason I initially didn’t publish it is that I realized it’s part of the trap to fire back at these people with evidence and reason. If I were advising RFK Jr.’s campaign, I would say: “Let him talk. He will always sound like peace and they will always sound like war.” (I may be alone in the camp that argues RFK Jr. is actually an American Transcendentalist.)
Here’s what’s so interesting, and so hopeful:
RFK Jr. knows how to actually transform these moments by using a method that wins by changing the battlefield.
His father and uncle were close to poets—Robert Frost and Yevgeny Yevtushenko to cite but two—and it shows in RFK Jr’s lapidary use of words. But these words are always emanating from a distant land for the American ear, 2023:
That which is.
(“Truth” is a near ruined word.)
This is a digression, but I doubt most people know this, and it’s worth a detour:
This outtake below is from the…Washington Post (!) 1987.
As you know, I love Yevtushenko, father of the great line, among many others, describing a literary in-crowd: “…you who are so revoltingly normal, you are abnormal from birth.”
I didn't know about the friendship between Robert F. Kennedy and Yevtushenko, until recently, and this anecdote contains, for me personally, an oasis of meaning:
1987 WaPo article “US Betrayed Two Soviets, Interpreter Confirms,” here.
“The cynical logic was shattering. There is more to this story but the time has not come to tell it,” Yevtushenko said.
…”A spokesman for The Central Intelligence Agency had no comment.”
The CIA was betraying Soviet dissidents in the 1960s, causing them lengthy prison sentences, or worse. (Vladimir Bukovsky and Diana West correct, again.)
Robert F. Kennedy brought Yevtushenko into a bathroom in his home, and turned on the shower, to deflect the sound in order to tell him the truth.
If that does not do it for you—
Mr. Kennedy was a Democrat and a champion of real human rights, but was not an internationalist/globalist, nor is his son. Forget Democrat/Republican—I see this as the only distinction of real consequence. Plenty of Republicans are globalist/collectivist agents; Very few Democrats are not.
I’m going to call Diana West and ask her if she knows this astounding historical detail. (Probably, she does.)
In college, a beloved classics professor (of Irish descent) told us there was figure known as an “Aristotelian hero” who “lights up when he falls.” I never forgot it.
RFK Jr. lights up when he falls.
What I think they (Woke Media) are discovering is this: Even when you bash Robert F. Kennedy Jr. like a piñata at a very popular kid’s party, the result is not predictable, and can even backfire disquietingly.
Woke Media stands foiled and naked as Andersen’s Emperor today.
And Robert F. Kennedy Jr. once again stands champion, between them (abuser) and us, (American people) triumphant by way of that wholly un-American quality called honesty. Read to the end.
"It’s clear to me now that I need to be much more careful," Kennedy told JNS. (Jewish News Syndicate.)
"I have to learn a lesson from this, and the lesson I learn is that I have to understand that the words that I use have impact, and they can be misused and misinterpreted," he said. "I regret talking about that study, and I am going to be careful to make sure that I don’t do anything like that in the future."
“Kennedy's controversial remarks included the Democratic presidential candidate saying he did not know whether the virus* was "deliberately targeted or not," but that there were "papers out there that show the racial or ethnic differential and impact" on different groups.”
(*They mean bio-weapon.)
Article here. (In the comments, by the way, I tried to comment by citing the scientific literature RFK Jr. was citing, and was blocked, with a message telling me my comment would be found “inappropriate” by some people. I was offered a chance to “submit it anyway” and it is “pending approval.”)
If I were running the opposition’s black PR ops, I would have long since called the bully A-team together and said:
“Look, we have an emergency situation here. This guy owns his mistakes. He’s not going to be provoked into saying something we can use to make the nation even more miserable than we’ve made it thus far.
“We have to be prepared for him turning it all around on us. He’s an AA guy—a recovered former addict who turned his life around. He’s trained to do something called ruthless moral inventory. What is that, again? Can somebody look it up in that AA book whatever it is? Anyway, we have to factor it in at all times. He’s got some kind of interior code we have to study. This one’s not going to be easy, guys”
Picture the foiled Warner Bros. villain frown, smoking ears, and exploding cigar: Dammit, this guy takes all of that flogging, (even his own family words like “vile”) and turns it into lessons he has to learn?
Fox News article, circles back to That Which Is:
"There is an argument that it is ethnically targeted. COVID-19 attacks certain races disproportionately," he said. "COVID-19 is targeted to attack Caucasians and Black people. The people who are most immune are Ashkenazi Jews and Chinese."
“According to the Post, Kennedy also claimed the Chinese "are spending hundreds of millions of dollars developing ethnic bioweapons," and that the U.S. was also "developing ethnic bioweapons."
“White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre ripped his comments as "false," (she is WRONG) "vile" (not the “science,” but the citing of it) and said they "put our fellow Americans in danger." (Unlike lockdowns, the decimation of the US economy and injections that have by the government’s own admission have maimed and killed a huge number) Kennedy's nephew, former Rep. Joe Kennedy III, said his uncle's comments were "hurtful and wrong," while his sister Kerry Kennedy condemned them as "deplorable and untruthful." (Is Kerry Kennedy intending to invoke HRC by choosing that word, “deplorable?”)
“After the Post story broke, Kennedy attempted to clarify his remarks on social media, calling the Post's story "mistaken" and linking a study detailing the different effects COVID-19 had on people of different races to support his claims.
"I accurately pointed out — during an off-the-record conversation — that the U.S. and other governments are developing ethnically targeted bioweapons and that a 2021 study of the COVID-19 virus shows that COVID-19 appears to disproportionately affect certain races since the furin cleave docking site is most compatible with Blacks and Caucasians and least compatible with ethnic Chinese, Finns and Ashkenazi Jews," he said.
“Kennedy also responded to his family, telling Fox News Digital, "The reactions of these family members are based on the New York Post's misreporting and willful mischaracterization of what I said. This is an example of how the media manipulates Americans into turning against one another. Fortunately, I am sure that the love within our family will prevail over these attempts to divide us. May the same be true for the country."
Kennedy described his long-shot bid for the Democratic nomination as a "mass experiment in truth-telling" and told JNS he will attempt to maintain his personal integrity and a "clear conscience" on the campaign trail.
[This quote, again, because it deserves to be read at least twice:]
"Ultimately, the success of this venture is in God’s hands, and the only thing I have control over is the little piece of real estate inside of my own shoes," he said. "My biggest objective is to end this process with my integrity intact. My second objective is to get elected president of the United States."
This elegant response by RFK Jr, will upset both Democrat Progressive globalists and genuine anti-semites. It will also upset the no virus “glowies” (a new term I saw recently) who are not interested in bio-weapons, and only repeat that no “viruses” exist. I’m open to no viruses existing but bio-weapons are not “viruses.”
I will be deleting comments that attack Jews, or any other people.
PS:
Did you know “Disney Plus” somehow banned guns from old WB cartoons?
—Mark Crispin Miller
What bio weapon? Hehe
https://denisrancourt.substack.com/p/there-was-no-pandemic
Of course, this cannot be said, even if it's the absolute truth.
Why? Because so many people don't want to hear that the sacrifices and fear they felt was all for a big lie.
I hope that RFK Jr's strategy of leaking truth and getting press for each step forward will work.
Relevant quote
"And then there is the psychological effect of the Big Lie which is axiomatic in gaslighting. The paradox here is that the bigger the lie, the harder it is for the mind to bridge the gulf between perceived reality and the lie that authority figures are painting as truth. I believe that the prospect of being deceived evinces a primitive emotional response on a par with staring death in the face. We are hard-wired to fear deception because we have evolved to interpret it as an existential threat. That’s why deception can elicit the same emotional response as the miscalculation of a serious physical threat. Lies told to us don’t always bear the same cost as a misjudged red light, but the primitive part of the brain can’t make this distinction and we rely on cerebral mediation for a more appropriate but delayed response. And in the long run, the lie is often just as dangerous as the physical threat. Many government whoppers – ‘safe and effective’ – do cost lives.
To avoid the death-like experience of being deceived, a mental defence is erected to deny that the lie is happening."
(From https://leftlockdownsceptics.com/alleged-cia-involvement-in-jfk-assassination-goes-mainstream-so-now-what/ )
There has never been a novel virus. There are 3 types of false flags: ones involving real violence and loss of life, ones that are 100% hoaxes with no loss of life, and hybrids designed to confuse alternative analysts. 9/11 and the JFK murder are an example of the first, Sandy Hook and the Gulf of Tonkin incident of the second, and the Las Vegas Massacre of the hybrid variety. The covid-1984 scamdemic has been by far the greatest false flag in human history. The basis of it was 100% hoax, though as result millions died and are still dying as a result of the hoax; There was no novel virus either as a love child between a bat and a pangolin or a deliberate or inadvertent “lab release” by the CCP Wuhan lab. It has been a fiction from beginning to end: the novel virus, the fake rt-PCR and antigen tests, the variant BS, and any novel disease. All 100% dogshit. The conservatives, in their arrogance, have been railroaded into the backup “look a squirrel” distraction of the lab leak theory. Much sound and fury signifying nothing.
But don’t take this dirty bird’s opinion. Rather read this fairly recent article by Mike Yeadon, a former VP and Chief Scientist of Pfizer’s allergy and respiratory disease division. He has become a reluctant hero of the anti-scamdemic movement.
https://www.conservativewoman.co.uk/why-i-dont-believe-there-ever-was-a-covid-virus/
So let’s skip to RFK Jr. I have been following him for years and subscribe to his CHD newsletter. I read his Fauci book and was very impressed by his research abilities and his understanding of real medical science. I also regard him of all the realistic candidates for POTUS as the most positive. That said, he should not be given a free pass. His understanding of THE SCIENCE should allow him to know that the whole thing was a hoax and that the scamdemic was a fraud built up brick by brick. The studies he cited were based on research of a false premise that covid-1984 has actually existed other than in the minds of deluded and/or compromised virologists and much of the world population. So one should consider then why he has adopted this position. Is it political expediency (as Mark Twain famously said, It is easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled) or something darker. Same thing goes for the related agenda of "climate change.” He has backed off from his embrace of it whole hog to saying that it is real but we have more pressing problems. I suspect this change was due partly over the past two years by the subscribing commenters to CHD mocking the once frequent positive articles on climate change.