KEY MOMENT: At the 15m41s mark: The criminal "professionals" are intentionally demonizing those parents who will not immediately go along with the gender dysphoria diagnosis of their children [made by criminals "affiliated" with the child's [public] school(?)] AND/OR who will not immediately go along the toxic drugs that are being "recommended" to treat said diagnosis: "[these are the parents who feel] very strongly that this (the so-called "gender dysphoria" diagnosis) is not the real issue, that the real is... [for example] autism [brain-stem nerve damage from vaccines]..."
I can't find it at the moment, but, about 11-months ago, I heard this crazy stat -- from a reputable source, saying that something like 75% of the children -- that are given the above "gender dysphoria diagnosis" [in the criminal manner promulgated above] are moderately to severely autistic [brain-stem nerve damage from vaccines injured-children]. 75% of all children so diagnosed! These criminals are preying on these already severely-debilitated children and their worn-out parents!
In all this talk I think the psychologists are looking in the wrong place. They can't really see what's happening because they don't have the language to see it.
The mental damage is caused directly by political-psychological warfare on all population since at least 2009.
They focus on the place that was bombed, but refuse to acknowledge the fact that there was a massive carpet bombing over civil population, with propaganda, about this and about other issues, like undermining freedom of conscience and of expression.
This is political, it's not really a mental health issue in the sense that it is caused by people or by society. It comes from the rulers directly.
I think parents need to be told the truth: the media and all the institutions are at war against normal human behavior. It is not their fault they don't know what they are doing or how terrified they are of making a "mistake" and losing their family to Child Protection Services.
We are in a war.
A generalized confusion this big, about everything, is totally abnormal, and it escapes the province of psychology. This is larger by far than what clinical psychologists are trained to understand.
Solution? Tell the truth: people must oppose everything and stop collaborating.
But they need leadership and people who tell them the truth. The psychologists cannot do that, they are too specialized.
I repeat: the education and licensing of Psychologists is designed by the state to prevent them from seeing the damage caused by institutions on people. The well is poisoned.
Only to be expected, as long as "healthcare" is a for-profit cartel owned by a few unbelieveably wealthy individuals primarily for their own further enrichment, & AIDED & ENFORCED BY YOUR OWN REGRESSIVE TAX DOLLARS.
I just watched this earlier today. An extraordinary interview. Dr. Money is a perfect example of how Nazi-like medicine passes for 'science' and the establishment around him not only let it occur, but doubled down when evidence to the contrary became obvious.
Is this available on Rumble or some other non-YouTube site? I don't want to feed the Google censorship beast. Anyway, YouTube is quite likely to delete the video if it gets any significant number of viewers.
I have a fourteen-year-old niece who has been “identifying as trans” for over a year now. She asked me to use he/him pronouns and I told her I’d think about it. After several days down the rabbit hole I came back and told her I would call her by her chosen male name, but I couldn’t use he/him pronouns because it defies the definition of those words. I told her I loved her and she can express herself however she wants without negative judgment from me, but that I hoped she would learn to love herself the way she was born and not try to wish away her body issues--that we all have as we enter into puberty. She has not disowned me. She doesn’t call me transphobic. (I educated her on the etymology of this term as well.) She continues to treat me as her favorite uncle. She knows I love her and will always be honest with her. And frankly, I think all the people who give in to her adolescent ruse lose a little respect in her eyes.
What a great, loving response to your niece. She is fortunate to have you for an uncle. These kids need this type of love and acceptance, in a way that does not deny biological reality. Not sure if this is the right place to post this comment, but Andy, you seem open AND realistic. So, I'm going to go for it... There is still no discussion of why some kids are at risk more than others. Almost all kids are attached to a phone w/ social media, almost all kids are eating crappy food-like substances, and almost all kids are exposed to wi-fi. In other words, all kids are poisoned by modern products and services, but nobody is talking about the totality of burden. There are scientists who understand the impact of one thing at a time, but there is an ongoing assault of chemicals and radiation and effects of malnutrition -- all at once -- at a time when hormones are changing and kids are utilizing incoming energy to grow physically. Are the girls who are at-risk more poisoned (in a literal sense) than those who think the concept is ridiculous? I do not know the answer, but we should be asking this type of question. Are these kids more likely to be sustaining unacknowledged vaccine injury? More likely to live under a cell tower? More likely to have amalgam fillings? More likely to have a new tattoo with colored ink? More likely to have experienced a traumatic divorce or death? More likely to be on meds for a chronic illness? We know there is underlying depression, anxiety, and sometimes autism-like traits in this group of youngsters. My hypothesis is: These girls are more likely to be carrying a high burden, whether that be emotional or physical trauma, metallic elements, halogens (fluoride, bromine, chlorine) that displace iodine in the body (required for building hormones and neurotransmitters) I suspect this is about more than social engineering. The mind/body is at risk prior to accepting the comfort offered by the socially-engineered messages. My observation (people I know, people I know of, and interviews I have watched) is that the girls expressing themselves in this way experienced early onset puberty OR high exposures OR both. Both lead to an elevated nutrient need that cannot possibly be met by today's food, even high quality food. I think their bodies are lacking essential nutrients required during puberty, and the hormones and neurotransmitter combinations required for building social confidence and desire for opposite sex get the short end of the stick during development. Maybe the 8-year old who starts her period does not yet have the hormones involved in wanting to find a mate and have a baby. (A good thing, actually.) But until the hormones and neurotransmitters finish developing (catch up; become more balanced in an ancestral sense) the onslaught of social messaging offers a reason for their lack of or confused feelings.
Thanks, Teresa, for your thoughtful response. I agree with what you’re saying, but in my niece’s case, it doesn’t seem to apply. Her mom is very conscientious about vaccines (though she was forced to get them last summer because we live in Maine), nutrition, love, support... Her trans issues coincided with her first period at age 13. She is a very deep thinking and very empathic and I think the various forces at school--guidance counselors, peers, librarians--put a lot of pressure on her. The funny thing is, when she’s home, she likes to put on makeup and wear dresses...
That is interesting. Thank for the details. You just ripped my hypothesis to shreds :) But that is a good thing. The 'guidance counselor' role has certainly changed since I was in school. My 19 year old daughter is a freshman, so I appreciate your insight.
I call it corpo-serfdom-- corporations making money off of bodies, not at all necessarily to the benefit of the inhabitant of said body, nor paid for directly by the inhabitant of said body (but by the government or health insurance). There are a multitude of ways this manifests (can you say covid jabs?).
@30:26 that's so profound to me. It's not simply that there's this grief, it's that you're not ALLOWED to express it. It's as if YOU'RE BAD because you feel something completely genuine. If your child was sick with anything else, or had a terrible drug problem, or was brutally raped, fine, society recognizes your grief. But for this sudden, rash, social media driven epidemic of insanity, it's...sit there, clap, nod and smile. Be PROUD of the fact that your child's life is disintegrating before you're eyes, or your no better than Himmler himself.
The only point that I have left at this point is; what do we have to lose? What does anyone have to lose? PUSH BACK. When the topic comes up, speak your mind. People will join you if you're brave enough to do it. NOBODY agrees with this bullshit. And corporate America is FORCING it one all of us. PUSH BACK every chance you get.
Is it just my flawed memory or something else, but I seem to remember when I was younger they used to say that sexuality was fluid, and nobody mentioned gender? Somewhere along the line they turned the whole discussion into something about 'gender'. The reason that I have a problem about that is when they first started out, it was about gay acceptance and that was supposed to be this great thing and for the most part people were ok with it and teaching children, teens mostly, was seen as perfectly ok.
Once they were granted the right to marry, the residue of the movement had to move onto something else however, and...they did. Here we are and they have to focus on 'gender'. Why though? Well, gender is a 'construct' we're told. But here's the rub, if it's a construct, why is it also a surgery? Because money of course. But, they...the powers that be don't need money, they can just use that to shut up rando Dr's.
It's about sterilizing children then. They...the money people behind all of this want to wipe out as many people as possible, and thus they seek to sterilizing children. So when we talk about this we should say 'we're opposed to the movement to sterilize children and we think that we should encourage children to celebrate the body that they have' or something like that. Steal back the language. Point out the hostility toward humanity that these people espouse.
It's all nonsense I told all eight of my grandchildren that if any if them copped to this insanity they would be dead to me as I would not watch them destroy themselves. Going along with lies is NOT kind in any way.
If you actually really really do care, especially about childern their futures & society as a whole, lies and delusions must be pushed back on.
KEY MOMENT: At the 15m41s mark: The criminal "professionals" are intentionally demonizing those parents who will not immediately go along with the gender dysphoria diagnosis of their children [made by criminals "affiliated" with the child's [public] school(?)] AND/OR who will not immediately go along the toxic drugs that are being "recommended" to treat said diagnosis: "[these are the parents who feel] very strongly that this (the so-called "gender dysphoria" diagnosis) is not the real issue, that the real is... [for example] autism [brain-stem nerve damage from vaccines]..."
I can't find it at the moment, but, about 11-months ago, I heard this crazy stat -- from a reputable source, saying that something like 75% of the children -- that are given the above "gender dysphoria diagnosis" [in the criminal manner promulgated above] are moderately to severely autistic [brain-stem nerve damage from vaccines injured-children]. 75% of all children so diagnosed! These criminals are preying on these already severely-debilitated children and their worn-out parents!
NUREMBERG 2.0 CAN'T HAPPEN FAST ENOUGH!
Yes, RFK links this to autism spectrum also. Which is linked to vaccines.
Don't worry, it won't happen to RICH ppl's kids.
In all this talk I think the psychologists are looking in the wrong place. They can't really see what's happening because they don't have the language to see it.
The mental damage is caused directly by political-psychological warfare on all population since at least 2009.
They focus on the place that was bombed, but refuse to acknowledge the fact that there was a massive carpet bombing over civil population, with propaganda, about this and about other issues, like undermining freedom of conscience and of expression.
This is political, it's not really a mental health issue in the sense that it is caused by people or by society. It comes from the rulers directly.
I think parents need to be told the truth: the media and all the institutions are at war against normal human behavior. It is not their fault they don't know what they are doing or how terrified they are of making a "mistake" and losing their family to Child Protection Services.
We are in a war.
A generalized confusion this big, about everything, is totally abnormal, and it escapes the province of psychology. This is larger by far than what clinical psychologists are trained to understand.
Solution? Tell the truth: people must oppose everything and stop collaborating.
But they need leadership and people who tell them the truth. The psychologists cannot do that, they are too specialized.
I repeat: the education and licensing of Psychologists is designed by the state to prevent them from seeing the damage caused by institutions on people. The well is poisoned.
Only to be expected, as long as "healthcare" is a for-profit cartel owned by a few unbelieveably wealthy individuals primarily for their own further enrichment, & AIDED & ENFORCED BY YOUR OWN REGRESSIVE TAX DOLLARS.
I just watched this earlier today. An extraordinary interview. Dr. Money is a perfect example of how Nazi-like medicine passes for 'science' and the establishment around him not only let it occur, but doubled down when evidence to the contrary became obvious.
Holy Crap! THIS IS WHERE IT ALL CAME FROM!
1)A traumatized boy grows up with a hate on manhood back in the 50's
2)Decides that CHROMOSOMES don't determine gender!
3)Gender is whatever you want.
4) Chanced upon 2 twin boys to "experiment" on because one was mutilated and made into A girl.
5) Saw them for years and sexually abused them while writing up and publishing his B.S. theories.
6) Got it into mainstream psychology and like sewage backing up your toilet,
HERE WE ARE TODAY!
Is this available on Rumble or some other non-YouTube site? I don't want to feed the Google censorship beast. Anyway, YouTube is quite likely to delete the video if it gets any significant number of viewers.
I have a fourteen-year-old niece who has been “identifying as trans” for over a year now. She asked me to use he/him pronouns and I told her I’d think about it. After several days down the rabbit hole I came back and told her I would call her by her chosen male name, but I couldn’t use he/him pronouns because it defies the definition of those words. I told her I loved her and she can express herself however she wants without negative judgment from me, but that I hoped she would learn to love herself the way she was born and not try to wish away her body issues--that we all have as we enter into puberty. She has not disowned me. She doesn’t call me transphobic. (I educated her on the etymology of this term as well.) She continues to treat me as her favorite uncle. She knows I love her and will always be honest with her. And frankly, I think all the people who give in to her adolescent ruse lose a little respect in her eyes.
...a "ruse" which most likely would never even have occurred to her had it not been for all the propaganda out there.
Well done, Andy.
What a great, loving response to your niece. She is fortunate to have you for an uncle. These kids need this type of love and acceptance, in a way that does not deny biological reality. Not sure if this is the right place to post this comment, but Andy, you seem open AND realistic. So, I'm going to go for it... There is still no discussion of why some kids are at risk more than others. Almost all kids are attached to a phone w/ social media, almost all kids are eating crappy food-like substances, and almost all kids are exposed to wi-fi. In other words, all kids are poisoned by modern products and services, but nobody is talking about the totality of burden. There are scientists who understand the impact of one thing at a time, but there is an ongoing assault of chemicals and radiation and effects of malnutrition -- all at once -- at a time when hormones are changing and kids are utilizing incoming energy to grow physically. Are the girls who are at-risk more poisoned (in a literal sense) than those who think the concept is ridiculous? I do not know the answer, but we should be asking this type of question. Are these kids more likely to be sustaining unacknowledged vaccine injury? More likely to live under a cell tower? More likely to have amalgam fillings? More likely to have a new tattoo with colored ink? More likely to have experienced a traumatic divorce or death? More likely to be on meds for a chronic illness? We know there is underlying depression, anxiety, and sometimes autism-like traits in this group of youngsters. My hypothesis is: These girls are more likely to be carrying a high burden, whether that be emotional or physical trauma, metallic elements, halogens (fluoride, bromine, chlorine) that displace iodine in the body (required for building hormones and neurotransmitters) I suspect this is about more than social engineering. The mind/body is at risk prior to accepting the comfort offered by the socially-engineered messages. My observation (people I know, people I know of, and interviews I have watched) is that the girls expressing themselves in this way experienced early onset puberty OR high exposures OR both. Both lead to an elevated nutrient need that cannot possibly be met by today's food, even high quality food. I think their bodies are lacking essential nutrients required during puberty, and the hormones and neurotransmitter combinations required for building social confidence and desire for opposite sex get the short end of the stick during development. Maybe the 8-year old who starts her period does not yet have the hormones involved in wanting to find a mate and have a baby. (A good thing, actually.) But until the hormones and neurotransmitters finish developing (catch up; become more balanced in an ancestral sense) the onslaught of social messaging offers a reason for their lack of or confused feelings.
Thanks, Teresa, for your thoughtful response. I agree with what you’re saying, but in my niece’s case, it doesn’t seem to apply. Her mom is very conscientious about vaccines (though she was forced to get them last summer because we live in Maine), nutrition, love, support... Her trans issues coincided with her first period at age 13. She is a very deep thinking and very empathic and I think the various forces at school--guidance counselors, peers, librarians--put a lot of pressure on her. The funny thing is, when she’s home, she likes to put on makeup and wear dresses...
That is interesting. Thank for the details. You just ripped my hypothesis to shreds :) But that is a good thing. The 'guidance counselor' role has certainly changed since I was in school. My 19 year old daughter is a freshman, so I appreciate your insight.
I think there are many ways a child can be screwed up these days!
Yes this is heart-wrenching. I had already read the story awhile back, and it's about as depressing and horrifying as it gets. A must-see.
Thank you for sharing this, Celia.
I call it corpo-serfdom-- corporations making money off of bodies, not at all necessarily to the benefit of the inhabitant of said body, nor paid for directly by the inhabitant of said body (but by the government or health insurance). There are a multitude of ways this manifests (can you say covid jabs?).
I think Dr. Money would be appalled at the carnival of absurdity that the tranny craze presents.
Now a whole goddamn state, a whole evil state.
The rot is terminal,
THE satanic atheist Guilty Liars and young peoples demons will have everlasting tormented suffering in hell more than we can imagine
@30:26 that's so profound to me. It's not simply that there's this grief, it's that you're not ALLOWED to express it. It's as if YOU'RE BAD because you feel something completely genuine. If your child was sick with anything else, or had a terrible drug problem, or was brutally raped, fine, society recognizes your grief. But for this sudden, rash, social media driven epidemic of insanity, it's...sit there, clap, nod and smile. Be PROUD of the fact that your child's life is disintegrating before you're eyes, or your no better than Himmler himself.
The only point that I have left at this point is; what do we have to lose? What does anyone have to lose? PUSH BACK. When the topic comes up, speak your mind. People will join you if you're brave enough to do it. NOBODY agrees with this bullshit. And corporate America is FORCING it one all of us. PUSH BACK every chance you get.
Is it just my flawed memory or something else, but I seem to remember when I was younger they used to say that sexuality was fluid, and nobody mentioned gender? Somewhere along the line they turned the whole discussion into something about 'gender'. The reason that I have a problem about that is when they first started out, it was about gay acceptance and that was supposed to be this great thing and for the most part people were ok with it and teaching children, teens mostly, was seen as perfectly ok.
Once they were granted the right to marry, the residue of the movement had to move onto something else however, and...they did. Here we are and they have to focus on 'gender'. Why though? Well, gender is a 'construct' we're told. But here's the rub, if it's a construct, why is it also a surgery? Because money of course. But, they...the powers that be don't need money, they can just use that to shut up rando Dr's.
It's about sterilizing children then. They...the money people behind all of this want to wipe out as many people as possible, and thus they seek to sterilizing children. So when we talk about this we should say 'we're opposed to the movement to sterilize children and we think that we should encourage children to celebrate the body that they have' or something like that. Steal back the language. Point out the hostility toward humanity that these people espouse.
It's all nonsense I told all eight of my grandchildren that if any if them copped to this insanity they would be dead to me as I would not watch them destroy themselves. Going along with lies is NOT kind in any way.
If you actually really really do care, especially about childern their futures & society as a whole, lies and delusions must be pushed back on.
John Hopkin's John Money is an outstanding member of the Reprobate Hall of Fame.
Thanks for putting this out. Watched. Learned. Concerned. Pre ordered hwr book.