Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Petra Liverani's avatar

"This is a post that does not seek to “prove” anything. Just something I found on WL."

Very interesting.

How on earth they're supposedly ordering Alex Jones to pay close to $1 billion is completely beyond me - surely, he's in on the complete nonsense. Nothing could be easier than proving that Sandy Hook was, in reality, an active shooter drill. You don't have to "seek", the hoaxery finds you!

The two best quotes in my opinion (the first applying to Sandy Hook (and many other events), the second applying elsewhere, particularly WTC-7's showcased implosion which serves as distraction from - essentially - the complete destruction of all seven WTC buildings at the WTC on 9/11 and the much more revealing faked planes and their association with the impossible failure of defence) with regard to propaganda are these:

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/13/World_Trade_Center_Site_After_9-11_Attacks_With_Original_Building_Locations.jpg

“The purpose of propaganda is not to persuade or convince, not to inform, but to humiliate; and therefore, the less it corresponds to reality the better. When people are forced to remain silent when they are being told the most obvious lies, or even worse when they are forced to repeat the lies themselves, they lose once and for all their sense of probity. To assent to obvious lies is in some small way to become evil oneself. One's standing to resist anything is thus eroded, and even destroyed. A society of emasculated liars is easy to control.” – Edited quote from Theodore Dalrymple, aka Anthony Daniels, British psychiatrist

https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/124952-political-correctness-is-communist-propaganda-writ-small-in-my-study

"All propaganda is lies, even when one is telling the truth." – George Orwell

I issued a challenge to the believers of the Sandy Hook narrative to present 10 points that favoured real over fake. It's impossible to come up with even one. The perps TELL you that it's a drill, they deliberately make the parents laughing and smiling in complete contradiction of how parents would normally behave after the brutal deaths of their small children - what do people say in reply to the commenting on the smiling of the parents?

"People show grief differently."

Sure they do but the thing is if you have ZERO parents showing grief in what would be considered a normal manner then there is nothing for the believer to grab onto in that realm to say, "This happened." There's nothing, nada, niente ... and it isn't only in the realm of parent grief that a believer has nothing to grab onto to say, "This happened." There's nothing, nada, niente in any other realm you care to name with regard to Sandy Hook. Coroner? Yeah, right. Gene Rosen? Yeah, right. Medical teams kept away from the school? Yeah, right. Blood? Yeah, right. Debris cast? Yeah, right. Bullet holes? Yeah, right. Check-in sign? Yeah, right. Testimony of teachers? Yeah, right. Testimony of children? Yeah, right. There's nothing - it's all smoke'n'mirrors.

https://occamsrazorterrorevents.weebly.com/sandy-hook-massacre.html

This is what a commenter on my post above said in response to someone attempting to refute my case for staged event.

--- Photos show a shot-out window of an opening too small to accommodate the passing of the alleged murderer and a debris field cast in the wrong direction

--- A meager scattering of what is purported to be blood drops on the ground are shown in front of the school, when the alleged event requires massive amounts of blood to be visible in that same area

--- Photos allegedly show bullet holes in a car, but actually depict body damage to a vehicle that could not be the result of gunfire from any external point, and specifically could not have been produced by gunfire from inside the school building

--- Photos of people “evacuating” the school were taken at times that both the accepted narrative and video footage of the evacuation route simply will not permit to be authentic

--- Witness statements are Impossibly contradictory

--- Recordings purporting evidence of actual 911 calls are obviously doctored and completely contravene purported witness statements and render them impossible

--- Death certificates purportedly exist but no one has ever seen or examined them and would be required to contain data provided by the coroner whose autopsy results contradict and negate official police reports.

The evidence of a hoax is abundant, and consists of virtually every bit of pseudo-evidence that authorities and mainstream media sources have offered. No two witness statements can come close to being reconciled factually, the autopsies and coroner’s incident report are hopelessly at odds with police reports and witnesses/“family members” assertions, purported evidence can easily be shown to be poorly manufactured and ill-situated in a manner that hopelessly conflicts with the official version of events, external data additionally falsifies the internally falsified and mutually contradictory statements of purported witnesses, some photos of alleged victims have been proven to have been co-opted from unrelated parties on the Internet and others have been reused in CIA disinformation operations in the Near and Middle East.

Expand full comment
the lilac dragonfly's avatar

We are bombarded with “situations” in so many places, we don’t have time to get to the bottom of one, before there are several others that need to be sorted out, and there are just more and more. Will we ever find out the truth about these events in our lifetimes?

Expand full comment
21 more comments...

No posts