"This is a post that does not seek to “prove” anything. Just something I found on WL."
Very interesting.
How on earth they're supposedly ordering Alex Jones to pay close to $1 billion is completely beyond me - surely, he's in on the complete nonsense. Nothing could be easier than proving that Sandy Hook was, in reality, an active shooter drill. You don't have to "seek", the hoaxery finds you!
The two best quotes in my opinion (the first applying to Sandy Hook (and many other events), the second applying elsewhere, particularly WTC-7's showcased implosion which serves as distraction from - essentially - the complete destruction of all seven WTC buildings at the WTC on 9/11 and the much more revealing faked planes and their association with the impossible failure of defence) with regard to propaganda are these:
“The purpose of propaganda is not to persuade or convince, not to inform, but to humiliate; and therefore, the less it corresponds to reality the better. When people are forced to remain silent when they are being told the most obvious lies, or even worse when they are forced to repeat the lies themselves, they lose once and for all their sense of probity. To assent to obvious lies is in some small way to become evil oneself. One's standing to resist anything is thus eroded, and even destroyed. A society of emasculated liars is easy to control.” – Edited quote from Theodore Dalrymple, aka Anthony Daniels, British psychiatrist
"All propaganda is lies, even when one is telling the truth." – George Orwell
I issued a challenge to the believers of the Sandy Hook narrative to present 10 points that favoured real over fake. It's impossible to come up with even one. The perps TELL you that it's a drill, they deliberately make the parents laughing and smiling in complete contradiction of how parents would normally behave after the brutal deaths of their small children - what do people say in reply to the commenting on the smiling of the parents?
"People show grief differently."
Sure they do but the thing is if you have ZERO parents showing grief in what would be considered a normal manner then there is nothing for the believer to grab onto in that realm to say, "This happened." There's nothing, nada, niente ... and it isn't only in the realm of parent grief that a believer has nothing to grab onto to say, "This happened." There's nothing, nada, niente in any other realm you care to name with regard to Sandy Hook. Coroner? Yeah, right. Gene Rosen? Yeah, right. Medical teams kept away from the school? Yeah, right. Blood? Yeah, right. Debris cast? Yeah, right. Bullet holes? Yeah, right. Check-in sign? Yeah, right. Testimony of teachers? Yeah, right. Testimony of children? Yeah, right. There's nothing - it's all smoke'n'mirrors.
This is what a commenter on my post above said in response to someone attempting to refute my case for staged event.
--- Photos show a shot-out window of an opening too small to accommodate the passing of the alleged murderer and a debris field cast in the wrong direction
--- A meager scattering of what is purported to be blood drops on the ground are shown in front of the school, when the alleged event requires massive amounts of blood to be visible in that same area
--- Photos allegedly show bullet holes in a car, but actually depict body damage to a vehicle that could not be the result of gunfire from any external point, and specifically could not have been produced by gunfire from inside the school building
--- Photos of people “evacuating” the school were taken at times that both the accepted narrative and video footage of the evacuation route simply will not permit to be authentic
--- Witness statements are Impossibly contradictory
--- Recordings purporting evidence of actual 911 calls are obviously doctored and completely contravene purported witness statements and render them impossible
--- Death certificates purportedly exist but no one has ever seen or examined them and would be required to contain data provided by the coroner whose autopsy results contradict and negate official police reports.
The evidence of a hoax is abundant, and consists of virtually every bit of pseudo-evidence that authorities and mainstream media sources have offered. No two witness statements can come close to being reconciled factually, the autopsies and coroner’s incident report are hopelessly at odds with police reports and witnesses/“family members” assertions, purported evidence can easily be shown to be poorly manufactured and ill-situated in a manner that hopelessly conflicts with the official version of events, external data additionally falsifies the internally falsified and mutually contradictory statements of purported witnesses, some photos of alleged victims have been proven to have been co-opted from unrelated parties on the Internet and others have been reused in CIA disinformation operations in the Near and Middle East.
Yes, AJ must be in on it too. AJ and David Icke are both controlled opposition- they reveal genuine truth wrapped in disinformation in order to make the truth look ridiculous. Both are still worth following as long as you can filter out the disinformation.
We are bombarded with “situations” in so many places, we don’t have time to get to the bottom of one, before there are several others that need to be sorted out, and there are just more and more. Will we ever find out the truth about these events in our lifetimes?
We can certainly know if an event is staged because staged events have a very distinctive modus operandi. Essentially, the MO is to "give the game away" with gratuitous anomalies on top of a base narrative that is very often preposterous of itself. It's called "hidden-in-plain-sight / revelation of the method" and they've been using the same technique for centuries if not millennia - at least as far back as the Great Fire of London 1666 and before that the Gunpowder Plot of 1605.
For their 9/11 terror story two passenger airliners into the twin towers would have been more than sufficient, no - impossible of itself but certainly sufficient? But no, no, no - they massively overegged the omelette by having a passenger airliner piloted by a terrorist who they told us couldn't fly a plane take that plane into Defence HQ while at the same time allegedly someone was notifying Dick Cheney that the said plane was getting closer and closer and yet Dick Cheney didn't do a damn thing about it! You see how utterly preposterous, how insane, how against reality - and yet they KNOW they can tell us any damn thing at all and most of us will swallow it. It works better the more ridiculous the story. Counterintuitive perhaps but that's how it works. They know that a small percentage won't believe their nonsense - and for us they have a separate propaganda strategy - that's the secret of 9/11 - two separate propaganda campaigns - one for the anticipated believers and one for the anticipated disbelievers so we ALL get it wrong - nothing they love better than both the believers and the disbelievers getting wrong.
Also of interest, that I never realized at the time, was that whole WACO thing, killing David Koresh and the children, etc., may have been an effort to hide a Clinton-sanctioned child trafficking operation ! Back in those days we didn't have the means to discuss or question anything, so we accepted the media's reports. But that whole thing is as suspicious as heck, now looks like a Deep State operation.
I think about that when there's a plane "accident" or a single house blows up without reason. Thinking about Waco, Ruby Ridge, Elian Gonzalez....Janet Reno at the wheel. What was the truth? Remember that plane full of CEOs with Clinton's Commerce Chief Ron Brown on board? There are so many reasons to distrust anything coming from government media.
Also, your comment reminded me of Lockerbie. Flight 103 in 1988. Turns out they were most likely trying to kill the agents (FBI?) that were going to blow the whistle on drug trafficking. Lots of interesting books came out over the years on that.
It's pathetic and insane: AJ sued for $1 Bil for spreading alleged misinformation, and yet--MSM spread lies about an exaggerated pandemic, lied for Pharma, and misinformed the public re vaxx guarantees of stopping transmission/and purported vaxx safety. The MSM lies 24/7, and they also put small businesses out of biz during lockdown exercises; and they also made beaucoup dinero for Bezos and Gates. Is "Hypocritical Hilary" too obvious a title for an expose' about the woman who screwed up the Benghazi episode which led to a US representative being murdered. Meantime, down in Mena, AK, the clowns and drug cartels were moving guns and coke to the tune of mega-millions in profits--these profits probably paid for slick Willy Boy's Presidential campaign. Also, Barry Seal was pardoned by the Guvna, and then murdered. Yes--we should restrict the Clinton gang's gun access when HRC is on the loose, and make certain she cannot evade prosecution. No defense for HRC, and this means gun bans for Hil and Bill as well.
Who else was on HRC's hit list?...all made possible via the Clinton gang's crime connections.
Just to say that while many documents leaked to Wikileaks are probably perfectly genuine, the film, Collateral Murder, leaked by alleged whistleblower, Chelsea Manning, was simply an infiltration tool. I was actually Julian Assange's father's neighbour for 13 years and we were very friendly, he was always in our house. I've tried to tell John that CM and CM were infiltration tools but he won't have it. Oh my goodness, it's so obvious when you look at the film that it's bits of genuine audio of soldiers stitched together over footage that isn't convincing and there's way too many call signs (13) for a scenario of two Apache helicopters who weren't even in contact with their ground crew - so anomalous of itself. The supposed amount of firing would have done way more damage than we see - it looks like Hollywood explosions.
it's a mighty good find! ('a course Frau FrazzleDrip cares SO MUCH about children...ze kinder...) If this ain't a) suspect and b) too slick by half and c) self servin' I'm a monkey's uncle (and not jus' a regular ol' crackpot). hmmmm....
We dodged a bullet when she lost that election. In the end, that loss was merely a speed bump on the road to totalitarianism and war. Can you imagine how her administration would have handled the covid? We'd all be locked in FEMA camps by now, all except the self appointed "elites."
Sandy Hook was determined to be a crisis actor scam by a former Director of State Police for a state in the south, I don't recall which one, who did, on his own time, and dime, about a year-long investigation into it. Why Alex Jones, and his legal counsel wouldn't call that man as a witness is beyond me. I believe Sandy Hook was one of many false flags most likely conducted by the Feral Butthead Idiots which were led by a cross-dressing, closeted rump ranger who sexually abused children. The Feral Butthead Idiots are headquartered in a building named after the sodomite, blackmailing, feral, fascist POS J. Edgar Hoover. Being a worthless, lying POS is a requirement for being hired to be in the FBI.
I also read somewhere that the same crisis actors turned up in other false flag operations. So the facial recognition software works both ways! People did searches, found the faces in other operations. Hopefully more smart people can uncover more proof of these operations.
When sandy hook was first reported witnesses said that they saw 2 men dressed in black running into the woods.
Later at the Parkland shooting ditto. Multiple shooters in combat gear, as told by witnesses.
More recently at Uvalde Tx the story is so inane that it has to be seen to be believed. An officer in full gear ...stops for ...hand sanitizer while CHILDREN ARE BEING SHOT??
And then, in the wake of all of this, we have been told in so many words...that its illegal to even talk about any of this?
If I recall this correctly, the late Senator Al D'Amato of New York said he saw and knew people in the Mafia all his life, but the Clintons scared him.
In false flag events, do they not kill one or more involved to make it more credible? The poor unsuspecting participants. I have scratched my head a few times over this drama and still don't quite know what to make of it. The most damning evidence of a staged event that I have seen are pictures of individuals that supposedly died at Sandy Hook show up in other places, very much alive.
"This is a post that does not seek to “prove” anything. Just something I found on WL."
Very interesting.
How on earth they're supposedly ordering Alex Jones to pay close to $1 billion is completely beyond me - surely, he's in on the complete nonsense. Nothing could be easier than proving that Sandy Hook was, in reality, an active shooter drill. You don't have to "seek", the hoaxery finds you!
The two best quotes in my opinion (the first applying to Sandy Hook (and many other events), the second applying elsewhere, particularly WTC-7's showcased implosion which serves as distraction from - essentially - the complete destruction of all seven WTC buildings at the WTC on 9/11 and the much more revealing faked planes and their association with the impossible failure of defence) with regard to propaganda are these:
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/1/13/World_Trade_Center_Site_After_9-11_Attacks_With_Original_Building_Locations.jpg
“The purpose of propaganda is not to persuade or convince, not to inform, but to humiliate; and therefore, the less it corresponds to reality the better. When people are forced to remain silent when they are being told the most obvious lies, or even worse when they are forced to repeat the lies themselves, they lose once and for all their sense of probity. To assent to obvious lies is in some small way to become evil oneself. One's standing to resist anything is thus eroded, and even destroyed. A society of emasculated liars is easy to control.” – Edited quote from Theodore Dalrymple, aka Anthony Daniels, British psychiatrist
https://www.goodreads.com/quotes/124952-political-correctness-is-communist-propaganda-writ-small-in-my-study
"All propaganda is lies, even when one is telling the truth." – George Orwell
I issued a challenge to the believers of the Sandy Hook narrative to present 10 points that favoured real over fake. It's impossible to come up with even one. The perps TELL you that it's a drill, they deliberately make the parents laughing and smiling in complete contradiction of how parents would normally behave after the brutal deaths of their small children - what do people say in reply to the commenting on the smiling of the parents?
"People show grief differently."
Sure they do but the thing is if you have ZERO parents showing grief in what would be considered a normal manner then there is nothing for the believer to grab onto in that realm to say, "This happened." There's nothing, nada, niente ... and it isn't only in the realm of parent grief that a believer has nothing to grab onto to say, "This happened." There's nothing, nada, niente in any other realm you care to name with regard to Sandy Hook. Coroner? Yeah, right. Gene Rosen? Yeah, right. Medical teams kept away from the school? Yeah, right. Blood? Yeah, right. Debris cast? Yeah, right. Bullet holes? Yeah, right. Check-in sign? Yeah, right. Testimony of teachers? Yeah, right. Testimony of children? Yeah, right. There's nothing - it's all smoke'n'mirrors.
https://occamsrazorterrorevents.weebly.com/sandy-hook-massacre.html
This is what a commenter on my post above said in response to someone attempting to refute my case for staged event.
--- Photos show a shot-out window of an opening too small to accommodate the passing of the alleged murderer and a debris field cast in the wrong direction
--- A meager scattering of what is purported to be blood drops on the ground are shown in front of the school, when the alleged event requires massive amounts of blood to be visible in that same area
--- Photos allegedly show bullet holes in a car, but actually depict body damage to a vehicle that could not be the result of gunfire from any external point, and specifically could not have been produced by gunfire from inside the school building
--- Photos of people “evacuating” the school were taken at times that both the accepted narrative and video footage of the evacuation route simply will not permit to be authentic
--- Witness statements are Impossibly contradictory
--- Recordings purporting evidence of actual 911 calls are obviously doctored and completely contravene purported witness statements and render them impossible
--- Death certificates purportedly exist but no one has ever seen or examined them and would be required to contain data provided by the coroner whose autopsy results contradict and negate official police reports.
The evidence of a hoax is abundant, and consists of virtually every bit of pseudo-evidence that authorities and mainstream media sources have offered. No two witness statements can come close to being reconciled factually, the autopsies and coroner’s incident report are hopelessly at odds with police reports and witnesses/“family members” assertions, purported evidence can easily be shown to be poorly manufactured and ill-situated in a manner that hopelessly conflicts with the official version of events, external data additionally falsifies the internally falsified and mutually contradictory statements of purported witnesses, some photos of alleged victims have been proven to have been co-opted from unrelated parties on the Internet and others have been reused in CIA disinformation operations in the Near and Middle East.
Ah yes. That is THE quote.
You Petra, are on 🔥
Yes, AJ must be in on it too. AJ and David Icke are both controlled opposition- they reveal genuine truth wrapped in disinformation in order to make the truth look ridiculous. Both are still worth following as long as you can filter out the disinformation.
We are bombarded with “situations” in so many places, we don’t have time to get to the bottom of one, before there are several others that need to be sorted out, and there are just more and more. Will we ever find out the truth about these events in our lifetimes?
We can certainly know if an event is staged because staged events have a very distinctive modus operandi. Essentially, the MO is to "give the game away" with gratuitous anomalies on top of a base narrative that is very often preposterous of itself. It's called "hidden-in-plain-sight / revelation of the method" and they've been using the same technique for centuries if not millennia - at least as far back as the Great Fire of London 1666 and before that the Gunpowder Plot of 1605.
For their 9/11 terror story two passenger airliners into the twin towers would have been more than sufficient, no - impossible of itself but certainly sufficient? But no, no, no - they massively overegged the omelette by having a passenger airliner piloted by a terrorist who they told us couldn't fly a plane take that plane into Defence HQ while at the same time allegedly someone was notifying Dick Cheney that the said plane was getting closer and closer and yet Dick Cheney didn't do a damn thing about it! You see how utterly preposterous, how insane, how against reality - and yet they KNOW they can tell us any damn thing at all and most of us will swallow it. It works better the more ridiculous the story. Counterintuitive perhaps but that's how it works. They know that a small percentage won't believe their nonsense - and for us they have a separate propaganda strategy - that's the secret of 9/11 - two separate propaganda campaigns - one for the anticipated believers and one for the anticipated disbelievers so we ALL get it wrong - nothing they love better than both the believers and the disbelievers getting wrong.
https://petraliverani.substack.com/p/both-believers-and-disbelievers-of
Excellent post, thank you.
Also of interest, that I never realized at the time, was that whole WACO thing, killing David Koresh and the children, etc., may have been an effort to hide a Clinton-sanctioned child trafficking operation ! Back in those days we didn't have the means to discuss or question anything, so we accepted the media's reports. But that whole thing is as suspicious as heck, now looks like a Deep State operation.
I think about that when there's a plane "accident" or a single house blows up without reason. Thinking about Waco, Ruby Ridge, Elian Gonzalez....Janet Reno at the wheel. What was the truth? Remember that plane full of CEOs with Clinton's Commerce Chief Ron Brown on board? There are so many reasons to distrust anything coming from government media.
Also, your comment reminded me of Lockerbie. Flight 103 in 1988. Turns out they were most likely trying to kill the agents (FBI?) that were going to blow the whistle on drug trafficking. Lots of interesting books came out over the years on that.
It's pathetic and insane: AJ sued for $1 Bil for spreading alleged misinformation, and yet--MSM spread lies about an exaggerated pandemic, lied for Pharma, and misinformed the public re vaxx guarantees of stopping transmission/and purported vaxx safety. The MSM lies 24/7, and they also put small businesses out of biz during lockdown exercises; and they also made beaucoup dinero for Bezos and Gates. Is "Hypocritical Hilary" too obvious a title for an expose' about the woman who screwed up the Benghazi episode which led to a US representative being murdered. Meantime, down in Mena, AK, the clowns and drug cartels were moving guns and coke to the tune of mega-millions in profits--these profits probably paid for slick Willy Boy's Presidential campaign. Also, Barry Seal was pardoned by the Guvna, and then murdered. Yes--we should restrict the Clinton gang's gun access when HRC is on the loose, and make certain she cannot evade prosecution. No defense for HRC, and this means gun bans for Hil and Bill as well.
Who else was on HRC's hit list?...all made possible via the Clinton gang's crime connections.
Just to say that while many documents leaked to Wikileaks are probably perfectly genuine, the film, Collateral Murder, leaked by alleged whistleblower, Chelsea Manning, was simply an infiltration tool. I was actually Julian Assange's father's neighbour for 13 years and we were very friendly, he was always in our house. I've tried to tell John that CM and CM were infiltration tools but he won't have it. Oh my goodness, it's so obvious when you look at the film that it's bits of genuine audio of soldiers stitched together over footage that isn't convincing and there's way too many call signs (13) for a scenario of two Apache helicopters who weren't even in contact with their ground crew - so anomalous of itself. The supposed amount of firing would have done way more damage than we see - it looks like Hollywood explosions.
https://occamsrazorterrorevents.weebly.com/wikileaks-controlled-opposition.html
it's a mighty good find! ('a course Frau FrazzleDrip cares SO MUCH about children...ze kinder...) If this ain't a) suspect and b) too slick by half and c) self servin' I'm a monkey's uncle (and not jus' a regular ol' crackpot). hmmmm....
We dodged a bullet when she lost that election. In the end, that loss was merely a speed bump on the road to totalitarianism and war. Can you imagine how her administration would have handled the covid? We'd all be locked in FEMA camps by now, all except the self appointed "elites."
My question is this; why aren’t we digging into the past of the shooter or looking into who he was communicating with online?
(Assuming of course that the massacre happened)
I bet you would find a trail of online chats leading back to a C. Eye A contractor/CI which would show evidence that he was encouraged to do the deed.
I think the same is true for the kid who shot up the school in New Mexico or wherever it was.
I believe they are creating mass shootings at the worst possible locations (innocent, defenseless children) in order to justify taking our guns away.
Sandy Hook was determined to be a crisis actor scam by a former Director of State Police for a state in the south, I don't recall which one, who did, on his own time, and dime, about a year-long investigation into it. Why Alex Jones, and his legal counsel wouldn't call that man as a witness is beyond me. I believe Sandy Hook was one of many false flags most likely conducted by the Feral Butthead Idiots which were led by a cross-dressing, closeted rump ranger who sexually abused children. The Feral Butthead Idiots are headquartered in a building named after the sodomite, blackmailing, feral, fascist POS J. Edgar Hoover. Being a worthless, lying POS is a requirement for being hired to be in the FBI.
I also read somewhere that the same crisis actors turned up in other false flag operations. So the facial recognition software works both ways! People did searches, found the faces in other operations. Hopefully more smart people can uncover more proof of these operations.
When sandy hook was first reported witnesses said that they saw 2 men dressed in black running into the woods.
Later at the Parkland shooting ditto. Multiple shooters in combat gear, as told by witnesses.
More recently at Uvalde Tx the story is so inane that it has to be seen to be believed. An officer in full gear ...stops for ...hand sanitizer while CHILDREN ARE BEING SHOT??
And then, in the wake of all of this, we have been told in so many words...that its illegal to even talk about any of this?
Do the math. It is not that hard to figure out.
Links to YouTube are now NOT AVAILABLE ( or at least from England UnWatchable ) I think it's deleted.
If I recall this correctly, the late Senator Al D'Amato of New York said he saw and knew people in the Mafia all his life, but the Clintons scared him.
I can’t access any of these videos. They are all marked "private".
In false flag events, do they not kill one or more involved to make it more credible? The poor unsuspecting participants. I have scratched my head a few times over this drama and still don't quite know what to make of it. The most damning evidence of a staged event that I have seen are pictures of individuals that supposedly died at Sandy Hook show up in other places, very much alive.
Disgusting.