81 Comments
User's avatar
Arlene's avatar

"It’s merely a don’t seek/avoid poison lifestyle."

I really like your call to health thyself, so to speak. I'd add only that this doesn't mean let up on the pressure because the "them" behind it all make this hard by killing perfectly healthy small farm & ranch livestock, spraying only God knows what overhead and leaching it from everything dang thing.

You're absolutely correct that diet, exercise, avoiding the medical industry get you a lot of return for your effort. Zero doubt of that.

Expand full comment
Dee's avatar

It's always been about us. This war will not be won without prayer, fasting and staying the course. This war is not a war of flesh and blood but powers in high places. It always has been and always will be. They win if we let up😡

Expand full comment
sifubernie's avatar

Meantime, if you care for your health and your loved ones, stay away from vaccines and the garbage that pharma puts out. Very simple.

Expand full comment
Annie's avatar

Agree 💯 Just say no!

Expand full comment
sifubernie's avatar

and when the movement grows, they will crumble despite the crooked politicians!

Expand full comment
Dave aka Geezermann's avatar

It takes some time to remove an entrenched enemy. RFK Jr. means what he says, and far more good things will happen than not. He does have the long-term health of America as his ensign. He needs the people behind him.

Expand full comment
Franklin O'Kanu's avatar

With RFK and Vaccines, we need to stop saying “vaccines cause autism.” This is not legally or clinically correct.

The correct term is that vaccines cause vaccine-induced encephalopathy—which has autism characteristics.

This is the true win that MAHA needs to expose: https://unorthodoxy.substack.com/p/stop-calling-it-autism-start-calling

Expand full comment
Dave aka Geezermann's avatar

I'm ready to hear that all vaccines are dangerous and ineffective, and must be banned.

Expand full comment
Ekoh's avatar

Excellent point.

Expand full comment
Shona Duncan's avatar

Thank you. I've been feeling shockingly sad about the slowness of withdrawing mRNA injections and hearing the FDA are fast tracking the Replicon variety. I will reserve judgement about RFK Jr because I liked him a lot and what we are perhaps seeing is political strategy. How I wish health wasn't political. I have found a lot on depopulation, a 2015 speech by the Malaysian prime minister talking about the NWO and how they intend to depopulate, and other sources. We are going to be too sick to fight back or survive.

Expand full comment
David Roberts's avatar

"I believe the answer is no. Rather, I believe his entire strategy is to fight this (the pharma-mRNA-vaccines war) as a data war, forcing the opposition to be (as they openly are) against transparent scientific data for the American people."

I think this is exactly right, Celia. If he were to say "all vaccines suck" at this point, he would just be giving ammunition to his enemies. They would be insisting he's nothing but an ideologue and calling for his head (which they are doing, regardless, but with less ammo than if he gave it to them). I think he's playing it smart by pushing for more data and open data, doing the tests that frankly should have been done decades ago to prove safety. And when the results come back as we all suspect they will, he'll be able to beat the pharma industry over the head with them. And he'll have "science" on his side, so it will be much more difficult for the industry to demonize him. IMO, this is the right play. But it does mean having to sit through some disease outbreaks where RFK will be forced to say, "The vaccine exists if you want it." And again, RFK has always said that he's not anti-vax. If the promise of vaccines (get jabbed, don't get the disease, don't get afflicted by side effects) was borne out in a safe product, he would be for that. But he doesn't believe the current vaccines deliver that. Frankly, I agree with him. I have also become a bit skeptical about whether a safe vaccine will ever be possible. I suspect that we have a limited, and therefore slightly faulty view of how the immune system works and that our attempts to trick it into doing what we want AND ONLY what we want will be shown to be impossible.

Expand full comment
Baldmichael's avatar

Vaccines are a deceptive magic trick. They are based on the lie that poisoning the body with the alleged disease causing agent will provide some form of protection.

https://baldmichael.substack.com/p/why-vaccines-do-not-work-in-a-nutshell?utm_source=publication-search

Expand full comment
David Roberts's avatar

IMO, vaccines are based on the reasonable conjecture that one can provoke the body's immune system with a weakened form of disease to mount a counter attack and thereby gain "natural immunity" on demand. The problem is not the conjecture, but, rather, that the conjecture is false. It turns out that the body doesn't respond actively enough to just a weakened form of the disease to prevent future disease. So, the vaccines have adjuvants in them that are designed to provoke the body even more. And, IMO, these adjuvants are the cause of a lot of the problems. Maybe that's what you're talking about when you say "poison" (e.g., Thimerosal/mercury). So, IMO, the conjecture is false and you either get safe (safer?) vaccines that aren't very effective, or you get (slightly?) more effective vaccines that aren't very safe. Neither of those is a good choice, but at least the first wouldn't be so bad (just costly with no efficacy).

Expand full comment
Baldmichael's avatar

Thanks for your reply David. Whatever is in the vaccines (we have to take what is listed as ingredients as individual vials are not tested to my knowledge) this is toxic to the body and yes, the adjuvants are probably the real threat.

Quite what the active or inactive virus really is one must wonder but it has to come in a solution of some sort.

But vaccines cannot be effective, only varying degrees of unsafe. If they should contain just saline in any vials then they will not be harmful, but still of course a huge fraud for profit.

https://baldmichael.substack.com/p/adjuvants-and-immune-response-what?utm_source=publication-search

Expand full comment
DWB's avatar

I knew a guy who, as a boy, was passed around to his male relatives in rural Nebraska for sexual purposes. When the memories bubbled up too much, he threw furniture, lamps, etc. and we had to duck underneath nearby tables. The last I heard of him he was shipped off to the state hospital for the cruelest drugs and other "treatments" available.

I know the argument is that if he had eaten strict carnivore he would have been fine, but I don't believe it. People suffer deep emotional harm and need help coming out of it. RFK Jr. should know better than to say such things, but he's taking a huge step forward in questioning psych drugs, so I'll support him and just disagree with how to help people like my friend.

Expand full comment
Celia Farber's avatar

You are quite right. I will amend—

Expand full comment
David Weiner's avatar

A carnivore diet will not be sufficient to overcome this type of trauma, but it may very well help provide the wherewithal needed to confront it.

Expand full comment
Marten's avatar

Especially organs meat !!!!!

Expand full comment
Yela's avatar

then why is Bobby not giving us vaccine choice by eliminating childhood vaccine mandates, why didn’t he pull the Covid quackzine and why is he in support of the new mRNA self replicating quackzines????

I feel betrayed.

Expand full comment
Helge's avatar

personally, all the way out here in rural South Africa. I think you make a very valid point. The other point that should be made is this: that the protection afforded by legislation allowing those poison companies to operate without liability is the biggest red flag of all.

And yet, hardly a mention. This is outrageous.

Expand full comment
Yela's avatar

I agree 100%

Expand full comment
David Roberts's avatar

Just wait. He cannot pull the plug on everything on day one or he'll be accused of being "anti-science," and he'd lose even Republican support. If he's able to run the trials he wants to run and get the data back that shows what we think it will show, he'll be in a position to start eliminating all of that. But yes, I suppose he could eliminate the MANDATE and leave the schedule as optional right now. If that's what you mean, then I agree with that. But the schedule will still be there, and that's what we really need to kill.

Expand full comment
Yela's avatar

that’s what I mean, elimination of mandates for now.

And i do realize that Bobby is in the den of vipers who sabotage him every step of the way.

Expand full comment
David 1260's avatar

It's clear you were hoping the AntiVax Fairy would be appointed Secretary. That's not how it works, here on Earth.

Expand full comment
Baldmichael's avatar

I wish it could be that simple. Sadly big pharma is so embedded in the USA it takes great skill to dig it all out in every last respect. The poisonous roots must be removed and burnt.

Expand full comment
Yela's avatar

absolutely

Expand full comment
Pat Fuller's avatar

Sure you can just say no until they force closures and use real ID to track and trace and vaxx in schools without parental consent. MAHA helped a an AI technocrat get elected and now they have decided to stay out of the headlines.

Expand full comment
Devi's avatar

Which AI technocrat would that be that you are referencing?

Expand full comment
Pat Fuller's avatar

Trump/Musk/Ellison/Altman/ Thiel….. need more?

Expand full comment
Devi's avatar

Trump is the only elected one within that group. I was appalled with that lineup, was that in the first week of the administration? All of that imagination is the Beast system and it is already running rogue in many aspects of our lives and has adversely affected me many times. The other socio-political crisis is in the Middle East where our dollars have fed that destruction and aggression. 2025 is a hugely transitional year; I hope I survive it.

Expand full comment
Pat Fuller's avatar

Trump through MAGA is the facilitator… he will usher in the AI digital cage. It’s already happening. He already allowed warp speed, the cares act and takes credit for the poison death shots. More FDA mRNA fast tracking occurring. People are zombies and so dumbed down they will drive themselves to the cage.

Expand full comment
Devi's avatar

I know and see what you are saying. Sometimes it does feel like we are at the midnight hour. Our whole healthcare system is in crisis and all of these injections people are taking and that are being injected into the newborns and all the children— this has to stop. That battle has been going on since 1796 when Jenner brought about his cow pus inoculation to treat small pox. And we, collectively, have gone from bad to worse over those almost 230 years.

Expand full comment
Annie's avatar

Agree 💯. The current system is a 7 headed beast. RFK Jr is going about it systematically cutting off 1 head at a time. He's also letting the opposition damage themselves. "Dr." Marks is a perfect example. Their refusal to provide real data etc. More and more people are awaken to the fraud. Have a little patience and do not believe a single thing from msm media sources.

Expand full comment
Baldmichael's avatar

Peter Marks is one of the Marks of the Beast!

Expand full comment
Trish's avatar

As many have said before me: "Let the man work".

Expand full comment
agnt RogerW, on Holy Night's avatar

Great post!

I have mentioned sometimes the problem of ideological possession. An example of this happens when people criticize Kennedy with too much fervor. Almost a communist fervor. (That unspeakable genocide, so long ago, and yet so close to our time... so traumatic.)

The symbolic execution of the person who is being criticized is meant to attract people to the ideology of the criticizer. Any sane person runs in the opposite direction, because standing near such criticizers heralds one's own execution in the future.

One can always express skepticism and rejection without insulting your own people. Unhinged behavior is equivalent to an insult.

But I see other people, much saner, who rightly and fairly pressure Kennedy. They remind people that Kennedy, as Secretary of HHS, has authority to end the PREP act declaration. This is being expressed in a way that is not abusive of the audience. Very important difference.

Expand full comment
JamesDuff's avatar

Well said!! Let’s pray RFK is dancing through a pharma beast that has serious teeth. May he bite back dismantling their ghoulish grips.

Yes sunshine, fresh air, eat wisely and avoid medical care that has not been MAHA.

Yes fix the VAERs system!! Capturing only 1% of events is insulting to all of us

Who know!! Or care!!

Expand full comment
Ekoh's avatar

Maybe we should take up a collection to buy Troy Farrah a generous supply of those tasty Doritos. Because we care about his health, right?

I used to be a vegetarian (AKA PITA) for a number of years. I just couldn’t handle the hangries, so I changed my diet to save lives. 🫤 I cannot handle so many carbs.

Gut health should be much more heavily promoted, and it is happening. It fixes more mental health issues than chemical poisoning by Big Food and Big pHARMa ever have. Proper food has much better results than those cartels ever have.

I was skeptical of RFK initially, but I think his eye is on the target and he is strategizing for takedown, one small success at a time.

Expand full comment
John Dissed's avatar

This is refreshing, thank you. I think we need a movement to protect ourselves from future insane mandates of even more dangerous inoculations.

Expand full comment
Walden Mathews's avatar

Rappoport has been particularly rough on Kennedy about the MMR statement. There's something that has occurred to me and I have not commented on it yet, but it applies equally well to Trump. To wit: We treat verbal events ("Kennedy said '...'.) as if they were manifest physical events, but they are not. So the question becomes, What actually changed (that we care about) when Kennedy said X? Or Trump, for that matter. It may be that nothing changes in our concrete world, but some alignments may shift inside the policy graph that is our collective government and its agencies. And that could be likened to a chess move of sorts. I don't really play chess, so I'm not in a good position to criticize those who do.

Expand full comment
Jeff's avatar

🎯

Expand full comment