Was OJ really guilty? Who knows. The larger event was the trial, not the crime. How long did the trial last? I don't remember, but I bet there are soap operas that have shorter lives. The trial was ridiculous. My ex said her mother had a whole box of 6hr VCR tapes of the trial.
Does the US ever come to, look at itself, and ask what is going on here? It appears to me this media circus was a diversion from some more important event.
And now the communist Chinese, having obtained our sophisticated rocket technology from the Clinton administration, have passed it along to the North Koreans. Build it. Test it. Works first time. Hey, good to go...
I remember that everything from the chase to the trial took quite awhile, and was a spectacularly large production. People ate it up like nobody's business. I guess they probably used it as a test - look at all the psyops that came after in rapid succession! Now they are practically daily.
I suggest they remember the 1000 times they've previously said - and relished - the same words. Condemning another is savoured by unconscious souls, ideally declared as a mantra, "Crucify him!" "Crucify him!" "Crucify him!" ... applicable to anyone not following mob mentality.
Thank you all for your comments and Celia for her insight. Sifting through the day of media mantras is more than I usually can bear. I try to avoid the vibrations as best I can. My 92-year-old father and I were discussing the effects of repetition yesterday. He’s been a voracious reader his whole life. He always talks about his grandmother telling him “book good” and over again as a child. Telling someone they’re smart or stupid or that they’re gifted or ugly over and over again has a deep effect. It’s s so pronounced and so obvious it’s a simple concept easily observed in both healthy and dysfunctional families. May God bless you all.
Hard to believe that next month marks 30 years since the murders, the Bronco chase,the trial of the Century and our obsession with it all. I am,like so many who are part of this tribe, in a whole different state of awareness since that time. Back then we just assumed that the media were all about getting to the bottom of the truth. Now we see them as purveyors of lies and corruption. The government as well. Yes I do think that we were once again led astray- our perceptions were fucked with. But what are we going to do about it? I ask myself this question every day.
concentrate on the good things that make us human - love, life and laughter, sharing and empathy, the arts.... they can try but won't succeed in taking these traits from us.
yes to what you say, about psyops. Gaslighting is a cousin to psy ops. I just briefly listened to a piers morgan interview with crown prince of iran, followed by Cenk Uygar and some fanatical unceaselessly interrupting israeli so-called diplomat. Cenk aside, the entire segment would make the uninformed viewer believe Iran's attack on Israeli military installations a total failure, when in fact if you listen to scott ritter, it was an utter success in its purpose and execution. Listen to Scott here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LU0vvFREehY
The murder itself was a psyop as was the trial. Even at the time when I didn't know the word or concept, the narrative struck me as very strange. It's turtles all the way down.
The story doesn't add up ... and when the story doesn't add up - as it so often doesn't - that means psyop. They drown us in these things.
Miles Mathis goes through the anomalies - you don't have to agree with everything he says but he certainly makes some good points.
MM is not trustworthy. I base that on prior readings of his work, in particular his JFK analysis. This time I couldn't get beyond one minute into it. OJ was born in 1947 and so was the CIA. Wow! Who knew? Next brilliant insight: "Who runs Hollywood? That's right our old friend the CIA." Um, don't we all agree Jews run Hollywood? Is Harvey Weinstein CIA? Are any of the moguls past or present CIA? He's barking up the wrong tree. Why, I'm not sure. I don't know who ordered/executed the hit. Maybe Kardashian. Maybe not. But I'm pretty sure MM is not going to enlighten us. He's going to titillate us. He's going to muddy the waters further. That's what he's good at.
The 1947 thing I agree with but the CIA and Hollywood obviously have a very close connection as we see so much predictive programming in films and TV.
Regardless of weaknesses I think the murder was a hoax and JFK's assassination was faked, no doubt about it - can't remember MM's actual take on it - but it's certainly not just him saying it was faked. Do you just not agree with his analysis or you don't agree it was faked?
I'm not denying there's isn't CIA input into Hollywood, but they don't run it. Who are the CIA agents in Hollywood? Doesn't the movie JFK which posits the CIA as hugely instrumental in the assassination seem unlikely if they run Hollywood? Incidentally the Mossad connected producer of that film was Arnon Milchan. Predictably, Jewish connections to the event were not included among the likely perps.
Mathis bases his thesis that the JFK murder is faked on a substitution of a double during the motorcade. This took place during an unscheduled piss stop which no one else reported. I'm aware others have made a similar claim that JFK survived. One even posited Kalinin as his hideout. No photos of the purported fugitive have ever surfaced.
I'm not familiar w/ the newer faked death theories. But not inclined to pursue them unless you can offer reasons that compel re-examination.
"Doesn't the movie JFK which posits the CIA as hugely instrumental in the assassination seem unlikely if they run Hollywood?"
God no. They're always pushing out stuff against themselves. It works a treat. "Operation Northwoods", the alleged false flag proposal to stage an attack against the US by Cuba, has been accepted as genuine since its "declassification" in 1998 (3 years before 9/11) because of the seeming counterintuitiveness of it being faked. Why would they fake something so incriminating? It seems to make no sense, however, it actually makes absolutely perfect sense.
When it struck me that the alleged false-flag proposal might have had a propagandistic purpose I checked it out carefully and it was immediately obvious that it did. Nothing exemplifies the magic of propaganda better than that collection of documents - they're so obviously faked and yet no one as far as I can tell saw their obvious fakery for 25 years! On my first acquaintance a few years ago I had no suspicion, it only occurred to me because I've learnt how pushing out stuff against themselves works so well.
A very important phenomenon to be understood is that we are profiled into approximately 90% believers / 10% disbelievers and because the 90% believers will simply swallow everything told to us those in power have a kind of "playground" in which to target the 10% with separate propaganda.
— Too few people lining the streets to watch the motorcade
— The people lining the street are motionless as JFK’s vehicle passes them, they don’t wave excitedly or show any kind of response
— Zapruder film is missing frames which were obviously cut
— Witness positions don't line up shot-wise
— Shadows don’t correspond and the long shadows we see would not be expected at 12:30pm, the time of the alleged assassination
— You really think they’re going to target a president in such a situation and rely on everything going smoothly?
— Does Jackie behave as you might expect?
-- John Connally's too obvious complicity
If you go to my page on JFK you'll find links to other analyses including a film that has just been made ... and a very bizarrely flirtatious phone conversation recorded between Jackie and LBJ barely two weeks after the alleged assassination which to me sounds like a parody of Marilyn Monroe's, Happy Birthday, Mr President.
Petra, you didn't attempt to rebut my basic challenges to the fake assassination of JFK theory. Where's the opportunity for substitution? And what is the motivation to have JFK survive? Instead you offer topically related fakery theories - Northwoods and Zapruder film. You don't get into particulars about Northwoods; so there's nothing to refute except the grandiose notion that faked documents if not discovered have magical power (to overcome their otherwise incriminatory disposition.)
I don't believe in masonic magic. It's smoke and mirrors - a psy-op, efficacious only to the extent it's believed by an intended audience, whether the markish 90% or the smartish 10%. Revelation of the Method is itself a psy-op on the 10%. No method is being revealed, only mockery that you've been fooled again.
The Zapruder film has been proven to be altered. Nolo contendere. But the anomalies themselves are proof of alteration to hide incriminatory details of the execution not proof that JFK didn't die.
I've enjoyed this exchange. You've obviously done some research and I don't get the feeling that you're disingenuous. But Enuf Z Nuff. Peace out, sister.
The opportunity for substitution? A break in the footage automatically provides the opportunity for substitution but the whole thing is faked. It's not as if there's a genuine motorcade with genuine bystanders. It's all fake. I don't exactly know how they did it but the way to approach the evidence isn't to determine the answer to certain questions - because you simply may not have them - but to see if there's evidence of fakery which there clearly is.
Northwoods was in response to your CIA/Hollywood question - nothing to do with JFK assassination.
Revelation of the Method is certainly used against both the 90% and the 10% - you just have to raise your level of sophistication to recognise when it's the 10%. A great example is the moon landings - they really happened so on the occasion of this superficially implausible astonishing achievement they pushed out agents to encourage the 10% NOT to believe in the moon landings in order to undermine them when they called out the real lies. But you can't tell 'em ... you can't tell the 10% that Bill Kaysing and Dave McGowan were agents who spout obvious lies and Bill Kaysing is a complete stooge. The moon landings happened, they were an astonishing achievement and it makes me sad that they have been used in this way against people.
Yeah, the Challenger disaster is a good one ... but I wonder if it is a kind of propaganda in the sense that they've brazenly pushed out these obvious still-alive alleged victims to make us think that this is a unique occurrence when alleged victims often simply carry on as who they are and if people recognise them well what are they going to do about it? Report it to the police or the media?
This is a page with a listing of MM's posts if you're interested which substacker, Dawn French, has helpfully created.
Also, interesting though is an analysis by Omar Jordan suggesting that MM could be a high-level controlled opposition agent. It's not conclusive but it is interesting at least. It's Russian Dolls within Russian Dolls. I'm giving the link to Omar Jordan's listing (MM is at the top) in case you wish to look at some other articles by Omar.
I can't argue with Miles Mathis' brilliant take-down on the show trial and its use to further shred the Constitution. Too, too many red flags and Miles shoots them all down.
The strength of MM is he points out what others don't see, even if not all the pieces fit (but then again do they ever fit 100%?). The shocker for me was the ultra-famous photo of Mark Chapman apparently getting Lennon's signature right before his assassination - - a close look reveals that Chapman is artificially placed in that scene, and, in other versions of that photo, appears to be literally hand-drawn into the background - you will recall half of his body is conveniently out of frame.... The blur between truth and lies just goes on and on. Go to his website and see for yourself if you want confirmation (search anything for "Lennon" in his papers). Bottom line: just like with OJ or anyone else, the media supplied the cast of characters, and our brains filled in the 80% of the rest of the required narrative.
My brother studied under Rene Girard, and I was introduced to numbers of his books translated from French to English. How might the world be different if, before watching the nightly news, citizens read a quote from Rene Girard? Some wisdom from Girard, Hannah Arendt, or others who give us pause, is in great need for a populace on the receiving end of psy-op after psy-op.
Same thing happening with the MSM PsyOp to prevent Robert F Kennedy Jr. from getting anywhere. Call him all those names, especially anti-vaxxer, fire up the hate and derision on every channel. Keep the electoral choice simple between a right or left half of the same rotten carcass.
This brings to mind the abortion perturbation. I'm not downplaying the role, presence and priority it plays in peoples lives, be they pro or contra. It's just that for decades this hot potato has had a preemptive effect on other conversations that might otherwise have been had. But that's the game isn't it to keep the populace perpetually upset in a tight confined either/or narrative?
Yes, and Biden is saying Trump wants an outright federal ban on all abortions which he never said. The Biden administration lies and idiots eat it up hook, line & sinker
They've made the entire pursuit of truth a psy op. A black hole with its own dark gravitational pull, flooding us with seeds of truth and decoys and distractions... more information than anyone can possibly process and distill. Our souls are the tether, I think, the only real intelligence.
Also, people might consider reading "Secret Societies and Psychological Warfare" by Michael A. Hoffman, if they truly wish to understand the depths to which PsyOps are carried out. I doubt many are aware just how deep these things go yet. This book will offer incredible insight.
Ever since your piece on O.J. I haven't so much considered his guilt or innocence as I have considered how many I sense are truly guilty and go free without any consideration-hiding in plain sight and even giving speeches and getting awards. (Fauci) While chosen others are focused on incessantly- as you so brilliantly clarified here. You're helping me decongest my mind- the prozac piece of the O.J. story is the most effective decongestant.
I vaguely remember my disgust when pundits were talking about school shootings, back when they first began happening, or bean happening frequently. Some point in the mid 90s maybe. They droned on about music, about video games, but I don't think they ever mentioned SSRI drugs or prescription drugs at the time. I was teaching at a college at the time and had been invited by a school principal to tour her high school. They called it a last ditch high school. All the kids were deeply medicated--it had a profound affect on me. I was so sad. The principal explained to me that it was important that they become socialized--that mattered as much as academics, she said. So I knew all these reports were lies--and that no one was willing to address the actual issue. And then I was angry too at the insane coverage. I was once running a truss spot for a large rock concert when a bomb threat was called in and we all had to evacuate. Bomb threats were never covered--that was a golden rule. I asked my boss if there was a bomb, and he said we wouldn't say either way. I think the show wouldn't have resumed if there had been, of course. But my point was that like bombs school shooting shouldn't have been covered. At least not on the scene. That all felt like a Psyop, and it is uncomfortable to say that for fear of misinterpretation. But it was just wrong--everything about how they covered it was wrong.
As far as I'm aware all mass school shootings are faked ... as are all pandemics (throughout history), self-immolations and suicide bombings. When I say all pandemics are faked I don't mean that there isn't necessarily a whole lot of people who got sick just that there has never been a pandemic caused by a transmissible illness.
More than a passing thought, an essential component. The laser sharp focus on one thing, to reduce the spectrum of possible thought & limit the imagination's ability to consider anything outside the sphere of attention presented...
Was OJ really guilty? Who knows. The larger event was the trial, not the crime. How long did the trial last? I don't remember, but I bet there are soap operas that have shorter lives. The trial was ridiculous. My ex said her mother had a whole box of 6hr VCR tapes of the trial.
Does the US ever come to, look at itself, and ask what is going on here? It appears to me this media circus was a diversion from some more important event.
The Clintons were in office during that time...enough said
And trying to distract from a lot of criminality - yep.
And now the communist Chinese, having obtained our sophisticated rocket technology from the Clinton administration, have passed it along to the North Koreans. Build it. Test it. Works first time. Hey, good to go...
😂 🤣 😂 With an extra body being added every couple of months or so, that's quite a number of alternatives to choose from.
I remember that everything from the chase to the trial took quite awhile, and was a spectacularly large production. People ate it up like nobody's business. I guess they probably used it as a test - look at all the psyops that came after in rapid succession! Now they are practically daily.
I suggest they remember the 1000 times they've previously said - and relished - the same words. Condemning another is savoured by unconscious souls, ideally declared as a mantra, "Crucify him!" "Crucify him!" "Crucify him!" ... applicable to anyone not following mob mentality.
Yes some do! My college sophomore son remembers it from high school.
Thank you all for your comments and Celia for her insight. Sifting through the day of media mantras is more than I usually can bear. I try to avoid the vibrations as best I can. My 92-year-old father and I were discussing the effects of repetition yesterday. He’s been a voracious reader his whole life. He always talks about his grandmother telling him “book good” and over again as a child. Telling someone they’re smart or stupid or that they’re gifted or ugly over and over again has a deep effect. It’s s so pronounced and so obvious it’s a simple concept easily observed in both healthy and dysfunctional families. May God bless you all.
Hard to believe that next month marks 30 years since the murders, the Bronco chase,the trial of the Century and our obsession with it all. I am,like so many who are part of this tribe, in a whole different state of awareness since that time. Back then we just assumed that the media were all about getting to the bottom of the truth. Now we see them as purveyors of lies and corruption. The government as well. Yes I do think that we were once again led astray- our perceptions were fucked with. But what are we going to do about it? I ask myself this question every day.
concentrate on the good things that make us human - love, life and laughter, sharing and empathy, the arts.... they can try but won't succeed in taking these traits from us.
Thanks Mary Lou. I totally agree and always appreciate the reminder.
yes to what you say, about psyops. Gaslighting is a cousin to psy ops. I just briefly listened to a piers morgan interview with crown prince of iran, followed by Cenk Uygar and some fanatical unceaselessly interrupting israeli so-called diplomat. Cenk aside, the entire segment would make the uninformed viewer believe Iran's attack on Israeli military installations a total failure, when in fact if you listen to scott ritter, it was an utter success in its purpose and execution. Listen to Scott here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LU0vvFREehY
Scott Ritter's writings for those who prefer to read his work - https://www.scottritterextra.com/p/checkmate
The murder itself was a psyop as was the trial. Even at the time when I didn't know the word or concept, the narrative struck me as very strange. It's turtles all the way down.
The story doesn't add up ... and when the story doesn't add up - as it so often doesn't - that means psyop. They drown us in these things.
Miles Mathis goes through the anomalies - you don't have to agree with everything he says but he certainly makes some good points.
http://mileswmathis.com/oj.pdf
MM is not trustworthy. I base that on prior readings of his work, in particular his JFK analysis. This time I couldn't get beyond one minute into it. OJ was born in 1947 and so was the CIA. Wow! Who knew? Next brilliant insight: "Who runs Hollywood? That's right our old friend the CIA." Um, don't we all agree Jews run Hollywood? Is Harvey Weinstein CIA? Are any of the moguls past or present CIA? He's barking up the wrong tree. Why, I'm not sure. I don't know who ordered/executed the hit. Maybe Kardashian. Maybe not. But I'm pretty sure MM is not going to enlighten us. He's going to titillate us. He's going to muddy the waters further. That's what he's good at.
The 1947 thing I agree with but the CIA and Hollywood obviously have a very close connection as we see so much predictive programming in films and TV.
Regardless of weaknesses I think the murder was a hoax and JFK's assassination was faked, no doubt about it - can't remember MM's actual take on it - but it's certainly not just him saying it was faked. Do you just not agree with his analysis or you don't agree it was faked?
https://petraliverani.substack.com/p/jfk-the-magic-bullet-theory-john
I'm not denying there's isn't CIA input into Hollywood, but they don't run it. Who are the CIA agents in Hollywood? Doesn't the movie JFK which posits the CIA as hugely instrumental in the assassination seem unlikely if they run Hollywood? Incidentally the Mossad connected producer of that film was Arnon Milchan. Predictably, Jewish connections to the event were not included among the likely perps.
Mathis bases his thesis that the JFK murder is faked on a substitution of a double during the motorcade. This took place during an unscheduled piss stop which no one else reported. I'm aware others have made a similar claim that JFK survived. One even posited Kalinin as his hideout. No photos of the purported fugitive have ever surfaced.
I'm not familiar w/ the newer faked death theories. But not inclined to pursue them unless you can offer reasons that compel re-examination.
"Doesn't the movie JFK which posits the CIA as hugely instrumental in the assassination seem unlikely if they run Hollywood?"
God no. They're always pushing out stuff against themselves. It works a treat. "Operation Northwoods", the alleged false flag proposal to stage an attack against the US by Cuba, has been accepted as genuine since its "declassification" in 1998 (3 years before 9/11) because of the seeming counterintuitiveness of it being faked. Why would they fake something so incriminating? It seems to make no sense, however, it actually makes absolutely perfect sense.
When it struck me that the alleged false-flag proposal might have had a propagandistic purpose I checked it out carefully and it was immediately obvious that it did. Nothing exemplifies the magic of propaganda better than that collection of documents - they're so obviously faked and yet no one as far as I can tell saw their obvious fakery for 25 years! On my first acquaintance a few years ago I had no suspicion, it only occurred to me because I've learnt how pushing out stuff against themselves works so well.
A very important phenomenon to be understood is that we are profiled into approximately 90% believers / 10% disbelievers and because the 90% believers will simply swallow everything told to us those in power have a kind of "playground" in which to target the 10% with separate propaganda.
https://petraliverani.substack.com/p/operation-northwoods-false-flag-proposal
Things wrong with the JFK assassination:
— Too few people lining the streets to watch the motorcade
— The people lining the street are motionless as JFK’s vehicle passes them, they don’t wave excitedly or show any kind of response
— Zapruder film is missing frames which were obviously cut
— Witness positions don't line up shot-wise
— Shadows don’t correspond and the long shadows we see would not be expected at 12:30pm, the time of the alleged assassination
— You really think they’re going to target a president in such a situation and rely on everything going smoothly?
— Does Jackie behave as you might expect?
-- John Connally's too obvious complicity
If you go to my page on JFK you'll find links to other analyses including a film that has just been made ... and a very bizarrely flirtatious phone conversation recorded between Jackie and LBJ barely two weeks after the alleged assassination which to me sounds like a parody of Marilyn Monroe's, Happy Birthday, Mr President.
https://petraliverani.substack.com/p/jfk-the-magic-bullet-theory-john
Petra, you didn't attempt to rebut my basic challenges to the fake assassination of JFK theory. Where's the opportunity for substitution? And what is the motivation to have JFK survive? Instead you offer topically related fakery theories - Northwoods and Zapruder film. You don't get into particulars about Northwoods; so there's nothing to refute except the grandiose notion that faked documents if not discovered have magical power (to overcome their otherwise incriminatory disposition.)
I don't believe in masonic magic. It's smoke and mirrors - a psy-op, efficacious only to the extent it's believed by an intended audience, whether the markish 90% or the smartish 10%. Revelation of the Method is itself a psy-op on the 10%. No method is being revealed, only mockery that you've been fooled again.
The Zapruder film has been proven to be altered. Nolo contendere. But the anomalies themselves are proof of alteration to hide incriminatory details of the execution not proof that JFK didn't die.
I've enjoyed this exchange. You've obviously done some research and I don't get the feeling that you're disingenuous. But Enuf Z Nuff. Peace out, sister.
Of course, the JFK assassination itself is a perfect example of RoM against the 10% too. We were given two options:
A. Lone gunman (for 90%)
B. Cabal (for 10%)
when it was really C. faked ... and they let us know underneath the propaganda that is was faked RoM style.
The opportunity for substitution? A break in the footage automatically provides the opportunity for substitution but the whole thing is faked. It's not as if there's a genuine motorcade with genuine bystanders. It's all fake. I don't exactly know how they did it but the way to approach the evidence isn't to determine the answer to certain questions - because you simply may not have them - but to see if there's evidence of fakery which there clearly is.
Northwoods was in response to your CIA/Hollywood question - nothing to do with JFK assassination.
Revelation of the Method is certainly used against both the 90% and the 10% - you just have to raise your level of sophistication to recognise when it's the 10%. A great example is the moon landings - they really happened so on the occasion of this superficially implausible astonishing achievement they pushed out agents to encourage the 10% NOT to believe in the moon landings in order to undermine them when they called out the real lies. But you can't tell 'em ... you can't tell the 10% that Bill Kaysing and Dave McGowan were agents who spout obvious lies and Bill Kaysing is a complete stooge. The moon landings happened, they were an astonishing achievement and it makes me sad that they have been used in this way against people.
Thank you for the link.
I downloaded it and find it fascinating!
I know almost all TV is faked.
People supposed to be dead are alive.
And they still use their real names, or close.
(Like the 6 of 7 people from the Challenger.)
You can't stop citizen journalists from discovering the truth.
It all comes out if we keep questioning.
Yeah, the Challenger disaster is a good one ... but I wonder if it is a kind of propaganda in the sense that they've brazenly pushed out these obvious still-alive alleged victims to make us think that this is a unique occurrence when alleged victims often simply carry on as who they are and if people recognise them well what are they going to do about it? Report it to the police or the media?
This is a page with a listing of MM's posts if you're interested which substacker, Dawn French, has helpfully created.
https://theresearchofmilesmathis.substack.com/p/categories-of-content
Also, interesting though is an analysis by Omar Jordan suggesting that MM could be a high-level controlled opposition agent. It's not conclusive but it is interesting at least. It's Russian Dolls within Russian Dolls. I'm giving the link to Omar Jordan's listing (MM is at the top) in case you wish to look at some other articles by Omar.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/ojebhndz2rsw8sp/ALL%20DARKSIDE%20PAPERS.pdf?dl=0
I can't argue with Miles Mathis' brilliant take-down on the show trial and its use to further shred the Constitution. Too, too many red flags and Miles shoots them all down.
The strength of MM is he points out what others don't see, even if not all the pieces fit (but then again do they ever fit 100%?). The shocker for me was the ultra-famous photo of Mark Chapman apparently getting Lennon's signature right before his assassination - - a close look reveals that Chapman is artificially placed in that scene, and, in other versions of that photo, appears to be literally hand-drawn into the background - you will recall half of his body is conveniently out of frame.... The blur between truth and lies just goes on and on. Go to his website and see for yourself if you want confirmation (search anything for "Lennon" in his papers). Bottom line: just like with OJ or anyone else, the media supplied the cast of characters, and our brains filled in the 80% of the rest of the required narrative.
I've never looked at the John Lennon "assassination" because I couldn't see any reason for faking it ... but you've piqued my interest now.
Scott, my response to Anne may interest you.
https://celiafarber.substack.com/p/note-to-self/comment/54118179
Keep in mind that the same morons that thought oj should die in prison are cool with mass murderers like Dubya, Clinton, Obama , etc.
They love to focus on the individual murders so we don't see the millions dead from their "freedom wars"
My brother studied under Rene Girard, and I was introduced to numbers of his books translated from French to English. How might the world be different if, before watching the nightly news, citizens read a quote from Rene Girard? Some wisdom from Girard, Hannah Arendt, or others who give us pause, is in great need for a populace on the receiving end of psy-op after psy-op.
I wonder if it is ever possible to escape the built-in scapegoating mechanism that all of us possess. I doubt it.
Your premise is 100% correct for sure. Psy Op = deception that can and does embody and utilizes the emotions as well as the mind.
Same thing happening with the MSM PsyOp to prevent Robert F Kennedy Jr. from getting anywhere. Call him all those names, especially anti-vaxxer, fire up the hate and derision on every channel. Keep the electoral choice simple between a right or left half of the same rotten carcass.
This brings to mind the abortion perturbation. I'm not downplaying the role, presence and priority it plays in peoples lives, be they pro or contra. It's just that for decades this hot potato has had a preemptive effect on other conversations that might otherwise have been had. But that's the game isn't it to keep the populace perpetually upset in a tight confined either/or narrative?
Yes, and Biden is saying Trump wants an outright federal ban on all abortions which he never said. The Biden administration lies and idiots eat it up hook, line & sinker
They've made the entire pursuit of truth a psy op. A black hole with its own dark gravitational pull, flooding us with seeds of truth and decoys and distractions... more information than anyone can possibly process and distill. Our souls are the tether, I think, the only real intelligence.
Also, people might consider reading "Secret Societies and Psychological Warfare" by Michael A. Hoffman, if they truly wish to understand the depths to which PsyOps are carried out. I doubt many are aware just how deep these things go yet. This book will offer incredible insight.
Ever since your piece on O.J. I haven't so much considered his guilt or innocence as I have considered how many I sense are truly guilty and go free without any consideration-hiding in plain sight and even giving speeches and getting awards. (Fauci) While chosen others are focused on incessantly- as you so brilliantly clarified here. You're helping me decongest my mind- the prozac piece of the O.J. story is the most effective decongestant.
I vaguely remember my disgust when pundits were talking about school shootings, back when they first began happening, or bean happening frequently. Some point in the mid 90s maybe. They droned on about music, about video games, but I don't think they ever mentioned SSRI drugs or prescription drugs at the time. I was teaching at a college at the time and had been invited by a school principal to tour her high school. They called it a last ditch high school. All the kids were deeply medicated--it had a profound affect on me. I was so sad. The principal explained to me that it was important that they become socialized--that mattered as much as academics, she said. So I knew all these reports were lies--and that no one was willing to address the actual issue. And then I was angry too at the insane coverage. I was once running a truss spot for a large rock concert when a bomb threat was called in and we all had to evacuate. Bomb threats were never covered--that was a golden rule. I asked my boss if there was a bomb, and he said we wouldn't say either way. I think the show wouldn't have resumed if there had been, of course. But my point was that like bombs school shooting shouldn't have been covered. At least not on the scene. That all felt like a Psyop, and it is uncomfortable to say that for fear of misinterpretation. But it was just wrong--everything about how they covered it was wrong.
As far as I'm aware all mass school shootings are faked ... as are all pandemics (throughout history), self-immolations and suicide bombings. When I say all pandemics are faked I don't mean that there isn't necessarily a whole lot of people who got sick just that there has never been a pandemic caused by a transmissible illness.
https://petraliverani.substack.com/p/psyops-nobody-dies-nobody-gets-hurt
More than a passing thought, an essential component. The laser sharp focus on one thing, to reduce the spectrum of possible thought & limit the imagination's ability to consider anything outside the sphere of attention presented...