Ask yourself why this story is emerging today. All the really spicy hangouts come out when everyone is talking about current events, and how treasonous and murderous the government is. Everyone knows the LA fires were unnatural, and we understand that it is becoming a smart city and hosting the Olympics in '28--and we're talking about it. The fires were federal government action, with the complicity of other governments and corporate interests such as housing insurance. Meanwhile, in Romania, the sitting government has thrown out the results of an election it lost. The sitting government is signing Romania up for the war in Ukraine, and Romanians don't want to get conscripted into a foreign genocidal war. Romanians Don't Want to get Genocided should be today's headline.
I listened carefully to the two interviews of Files, and thought "This is what I've been waiting for, and never thought I'd hear." I think he's the real deal.
He said people were trying to kill him. That’s why he was put in prison, attempted murder on a police officer, who he said was trying to take him out. But that was just one thing in a long list of attempts.
And still the same people that orchestrated the JFK assassination are in power telling us that the psychopathic protagonists of Palestinian Genocide getting a ceasefire is somehow also equitable with the sensibilities of Palestinians. the attitudes of the protagonists are not going to change.
"As a general preamble I’m going to say: if you’re not automatically assuming the worst intentions on behalf of the US and Israel, you’ve let yourself go. I won’t judge you too harshly for choosing wishful thinking over experience and momentary relief over actual change - we all do what we can - but I won’t keep my voice down, either."
This has reminded me of a couple good books I have read by Judith Vary Baker, the woman who worked with Lee Oswald and befriended him. They were close. One book is Lee and Me, and another is David Ferrie.
Baker knew that Oswald was used as a patsy, and he was not one of the shooters. She gives much interesting and valid background to the deep state ops going on at the time.
Nixon told Hoover that he "knew who shot Jack" Kennedy, and he supposedly left a time capsule to open this year. Maybe Trump will live to open it... Now where did Kissinger hide that thing?
Possible to share the broadcast mentioned? thank you!
"Since I have a heart for real outcasts, and find they often do hold the unpopular, ugly final piece of truth, I listened carefully. This broadcast is by far the most interesting I’ve ever heard on the subject."
Masses of streams of propaganda including an Italian documentary by Michele Metta that had me all agog as it involved Valerio Borghese, the father of a family friend ... but the truth is that there was no shooter, it was faked ... and they make it obvious under all the different streams of propaganda Revelation-of-the-Method style.
Why though? I've read Petra's link (and a lot of her other stuff ) and I'm quite prepared to accept the deceptions that people, collectively, describe. But why? Why stage JFK's assassination? If the Cabal is as evil as alleged (and I have no reason to disagree) why not just kill the guy? Why stage it? What's the advantage in pretending he's killed as opposed to actually killing him? To what end? The masses are asleep anyway, why do they need that amount of sophisticated deception? If 'they' want us to believe JFK was assassinated what does it matter if it was real or not? Either way it's believed. Knowing a little about show-business I can tell you its a damn sight easier to do something (if there are no consequences) than make people believe you've actually done it. Sometimes I think investigators of conspiracies (and I am one of them) can end winding up their own backsides. BTW 'Everything is a rich man's trick' has some serious inaccuracies, not least the lineage of the British Royal Family, particularly Prince Philip. And since the bloke who presents it is English you'd think he'd know better. Still, I have yet to see a satisfactory explanation, including from Frances Leader, as to why. There's less elaborate ways of going about gaining and keeping complate control. Our lifetimes are evidence of that, surely?
For sure. I have read a lot on that, but I'm a little rusty. I was flying to NYC the day his plane went down, July 13, 1999, as I recall. When you look into it the details are astonishing and bear all the familiar hallmarks--restricted search area, false claims about his aviation abilities, one incompetent local official in charge--there's a lot there. My memory is a bit hazy because it has been years since I read into it--but yes--he was taken out.
Do you mean, taken out as a character in the world's stage, but alive, or do you mean sent to his next life to be reincarnated as a Narwhal of the Arctic ocean?
I suspect that was faked too, however, haven't looked. There's pseudocide galore. Would love to know where all the alleged dead go. Someone on Substack says he was with his mother when they met someone in a dark bar in Turin I think he said and he thought the guy seemed like JFK and when he said he seemed like the president the guy just said he's dead. He said the bar was not the sort of place his mother would normally go to and he thought JFK was the sort of person his mother might have known.
Certainly, a plane accident is a good candidate to pretend a number of people have just died, and then they live under different identities. From the script writer standpoint, it's a very credible plot device. Maybe only detective Columbo or Hercules Poirot can figure that one out.
I like Ole Dammegard as well. I think his analysis of the first (alleged) assassination attempt of Trump was pretty spot on, so I will have to listen. I just learned about the Gemstone File. I don't know if it was a red herring to some degree but the Howard Hughes stuff was particularly compelling. https://hxlibraries.substack.com/p/paper-trails
I correspond with a guy who has a different theory -- tho' the bullet comes from the same direction. I'll give you his name / email if you contact me at jhkunstler@mac.com
Thank you James, much appreciated. And so happy you are here.
I would be wasting his time as I am a JFK zero knowledge (about the murder per se) but this interview brought many themes together about the "they" we all agree are running history yet we disagree about what to call them. Might you have time to give it a listen? I'd be curious what you think.
I saw a post here on Substack that laid the blame for the kill shot on Jackie Kennedy. I'm not convinced, but it was interesting. I can't remember his name.
Amazing that the JFK story has so many versions that don't necessarily contradict each other. This is a quick read about Chappaquiddick, with lots of fascinating details. https://microcosmpublishing.com/catalog/zines/12496
Ask yourself why this story is emerging today. All the really spicy hangouts come out when everyone is talking about current events, and how treasonous and murderous the government is. Everyone knows the LA fires were unnatural, and we understand that it is becoming a smart city and hosting the Olympics in '28--and we're talking about it. The fires were federal government action, with the complicity of other governments and corporate interests such as housing insurance. Meanwhile, in Romania, the sitting government has thrown out the results of an election it lost. The sitting government is signing Romania up for the war in Ukraine, and Romanians don't want to get conscripted into a foreign genocidal war. Romanians Don't Want to get Genocided should be today's headline.
Very sorry—the link to the show has now been added. I thought I had linked it..
Where?
It is linked on the words "You can listen to it here" just under the red image.
I listened carefully to the two interviews of Files, and thought "This is what I've been waiting for, and never thought I'd hear." I think he's the real deal.
I do too.
He said people were trying to kill him. That’s why he was put in prison, attempted murder on a police officer, who he said was trying to take him out. But that was just one thing in a long list of attempts.
Once again you are an amazing source of information! Thank you!
And still the same people that orchestrated the JFK assassination are in power telling us that the psychopathic protagonists of Palestinian Genocide getting a ceasefire is somehow also equitable with the sensibilities of Palestinians. the attitudes of the protagonists are not going to change.
https://alonmizrahi.substack.com/p/trumps-gift-to-israel
"As a general preamble I’m going to say: if you’re not automatically assuming the worst intentions on behalf of the US and Israel, you’ve let yourself go. I won’t judge you too harshly for choosing wishful thinking over experience and momentary relief over actual change - we all do what we can - but I won’t keep my voice down, either."
Neither will I.
This has reminded me of a couple good books I have read by Judith Vary Baker, the woman who worked with Lee Oswald and befriended him. They were close. One book is Lee and Me, and another is David Ferrie.
Baker knew that Oswald was used as a patsy, and he was not one of the shooters. She gives much interesting and valid background to the deep state ops going on at the time.
Two head shots from the front, one from the rear, NONE from the sixth floor of the Texas school book depository building.
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0CXLN1PX1?tag=bravesoftwa04-20&linkCode=osi&th=1&psc=1&language=en_US
You are amazing in your sticking with things and digging and listening within yourself for what is the truth in what you hear.
Thank you Elsa. I know you know well that feeling of "the sound" of truth. One's body picks it up.
Nixon told Hoover that he "knew who shot Jack" Kennedy, and he supposedly left a time capsule to open this year. Maybe Trump will live to open it... Now where did Kissinger hide that thing?
Possible to share the broadcast mentioned? thank you!
"Since I have a heart for real outcasts, and find they often do hold the unpopular, ugly final piece of truth, I listened carefully. This broadcast is by far the most interesting I’ve ever heard on the subject."
So sorry, I had not actually linked it! But I have done so now.
Thanks! ... interested in hearing the "The Global Importance of Operation 40" (now listening) ... A visual map would be so useful :)
Heard the LBJ’s men audio tape story on INfoWars last night. Now waiting to see what happens from this.
Ooo Drama! Low drum roll for old news rehashed for monkeys. The truth is it there X files ooooooo
I beg your pardon?
You have a good day. I will make a helpful comment real soon. I love the drama
https://youtu.be/kjEC49hTitI?si=wFWrdhRhNX_uxuGa
https://youtu.be/smM_bphb6pU?si=FTipyEbVZ2Hrauqr
Kill them all,let god sort them out
Masses of streams of propaganda including an Italian documentary by Michele Metta that had me all agog as it involved Valerio Borghese, the father of a family friend ... but the truth is that there was no shooter, it was faked ... and they make it obvious under all the different streams of propaganda Revelation-of-the-Method style.
https://petraliverani.substack.com/p/jfk-the-magic-bullet-theory-john
I've heard Owen Benjamin say this.
Why though? I've read Petra's link (and a lot of her other stuff ) and I'm quite prepared to accept the deceptions that people, collectively, describe. But why? Why stage JFK's assassination? If the Cabal is as evil as alleged (and I have no reason to disagree) why not just kill the guy? Why stage it? What's the advantage in pretending he's killed as opposed to actually killing him? To what end? The masses are asleep anyway, why do they need that amount of sophisticated deception? If 'they' want us to believe JFK was assassinated what does it matter if it was real or not? Either way it's believed. Knowing a little about show-business I can tell you its a damn sight easier to do something (if there are no consequences) than make people believe you've actually done it. Sometimes I think investigators of conspiracies (and I am one of them) can end winding up their own backsides. BTW 'Everything is a rich man's trick' has some serious inaccuracies, not least the lineage of the British Royal Family, particularly Prince Philip. And since the bloke who presents it is English you'd think he'd know better. Still, I have yet to see a satisfactory explanation, including from Frances Leader, as to why. There's less elaborate ways of going about gaining and keeping complate control. Our lifetimes are evidence of that, surely?
Well, he's got his finger on the pulse.
What about his son, do you believe he died in the plane accident or that was also fake?
I believe they killed him, yes. But that doesn't mean anything.
Whose son Roger?
Kennedy’s son, JFK Jr.
That one.
For sure. I have read a lot on that, but I'm a little rusty. I was flying to NYC the day his plane went down, July 13, 1999, as I recall. When you look into it the details are astonishing and bear all the familiar hallmarks--restricted search area, false claims about his aviation abilities, one incompetent local official in charge--there's a lot there. My memory is a bit hazy because it has been years since I read into it--but yes--he was taken out.
Hello A.M.
Do you mean, taken out as a character in the world's stage, but alive, or do you mean sent to his next life to be reincarnated as a Narwhal of the Arctic ocean?
John, who is JFK's son, who was Bobby Kennedy's first cousin.
I suspect that was faked too, however, haven't looked. There's pseudocide galore. Would love to know where all the alleged dead go. Someone on Substack says he was with his mother when they met someone in a dark bar in Turin I think he said and he thought the guy seemed like JFK and when he said he seemed like the president the guy just said he's dead. He said the bar was not the sort of place his mother would normally go to and he thought JFK was the sort of person his mother might have known.
Certainly, a plane accident is a good candidate to pretend a number of people have just died, and then they live under different identities. From the script writer standpoint, it's a very credible plot device. Maybe only detective Columbo or Hercules Poirot can figure that one out.
However, it may also be the case that it's true.
Coincidentally my latest post … https://petraliverani.substack.com/p/how-many-real-passenger-airliner
Pseudocide. 😁 First time I've heard that one!
I like Ole Dammegard as well. I think his analysis of the first (alleged) assassination attempt of Trump was pretty spot on, so I will have to listen. I just learned about the Gemstone File. I don't know if it was a red herring to some degree but the Howard Hughes stuff was particularly compelling. https://hxlibraries.substack.com/p/paper-trails
Celia--
I correspond with a guy who has a different theory -- tho' the bullet comes from the same direction. I'll give you his name / email if you contact me at jhkunstler@mac.com
Thank you James, much appreciated. And so happy you are here.
I would be wasting his time as I am a JFK zero knowledge (about the murder per se) but this interview brought many themes together about the "they" we all agree are running history yet we disagree about what to call them. Might you have time to give it a listen? I'd be curious what you think.
I saw a post here on Substack that laid the blame for the kill shot on Jackie Kennedy. I'm not convinced, but it was interesting. I can't remember his name.
Amazing that the JFK story has so many versions that don't necessarily contradict each other. This is a quick read about Chappaquiddick, with lots of fascinating details. https://microcosmpublishing.com/catalog/zines/12496