The world we live in is a psyop. It is designed to keep us on rails; in tunnels. The psyop directs us to make binary choices. Guilty or not guilty. Trump or Biden. Virus or no virus. Round or flat. Pro-choice or pro-life. Pro-gun or anti-gun. God or no god? Christian God or Muslim God? The truth is that each of us creates our reality based upon how we perceive the world around us. Each of us has the choice to step back and look at the stories and issues that are fed to us as dispassionate observers. When you are presented with an issue ask yourself questions like, "How does this affect my life? If I had never heard this story would it matter? Does it make my life or my outlook on life better or worse? Can I change anything regarding this issue? Why am I being fed information that has no bearing on my day-to-day? Who gains from keeping me in this frame of mind?" Over the past couple of months I have taken a vacation from the news, political podcasts, etc. and dedicated myself to asking questions. What have I decided? Most of this shit doesn't even matter.
I was really entrenched in the O.J. saga. I watched a lot of the trial. I had strong opinions that OJ was guilty. I have friends who were detectives at LAPD at the time who have strong opinions. But in the end, does it matter who killed two people that none of us know? Whether Ron Goldman and Nicole Simpson lived or died, it had no bearing on my life, but because they died, I wasted many hours of my life thinking about it, and time is something we can never get back.
I read an article about ten years ago (?) in perhaps The Guardian that said Just Quit the News. He argued exactly what you are arguing. It has no bearing on your life, the news is designed to get you upset, angry or emotional, you can't change any of it anyway, the notion of 'being informed' is quaint and irrelevant. Not once did he use the word PsyOp, my memory is that he called it a con--but the article really stuck with me. Just skimming this mornings headlines and uttering I can't do this, I can't read this, and then reading your comment reminds me of this article.
In Isaiah 40:22, it is written, "It is he that sitteth upon the circle of the earth..." The book of Isaiah gives credence to the concept of the earth being round like a sphere. The Flat Earth concept came from the Mesopotamians and were held by pre-Socratic philosophers.
@Josie: how can we know what is meant by "the circle of the earth"? a circle is round, but is not the same as a sphere, and this has to do with the difference between 2D (a circle) and 3D (a sphere). in maths we're taught to calculate a circle's area (remember pi?) and a sphere's volume.
Webster Dictionary: sphere (sfihr) n. a globe; a round body. 1. Geometry. A solid body which in every part is equally distant from its center. 2. An orb; globe; a round body. 3. Range; compass; province. 4. The heavens, - v. [sphered] To give complete and perfect form.
so: according to the Isaiah 40:22 text "...he sitteth upon the circle of the earth..." and not on the "sphere of the earth" << thanks to Webster Dict. we can now agree that it refers to a circular = flat "circle of the erath", not a round body/globe. Biblical Earth is flat and circular, and the ideas of a flat earth, nót a spinning ball is Biblical Earth.
"Round like a sphere?" Why didn't he say sphere? Planes can also be round. Circles are not spheres. Seems everyone has a Bible verse to prove their point on the subject.
We have tools to make observations today (think laser beams) that the ancients who wrote the Bible did not have.
Webster Dictionary: sphere (sfihr) n. a globe; a round body. 1. Geometry. A solid body which in every part is equally distant from its center. 2. An orb; globe; a round body. 3. Range; compass; province. 4. The heavens, - v. [sphered] To give complete and perfect form.
Some discover one truth then realize there are more truths to discover. It takes an initial revelation to get one started.
FE is at the basis of us understanding of our reality. It starts many on their path.
Some start with 911. Some start with the truth about health, especially cancer. Some have come to realize that the Holocaust is a lie.
When we discover that we have been lied to about history, we learn that the authorities are not to be trusted. They lie about everything. Realizing this fact puts us on the path to freeing our minds from the brainwashing we all have been subjected to.
That is becoming known by doctors who are investigating cancer and willing to go against the prevailing narrative and risk having their medical licenses revoked.
I suggest you follow Dr. Lee Merritt on her Medical Rebel Rumble channel.
Here is one I posted to my Bitchute channel Red Pilled Revisionaries.
Have you worked out the curvature for a 25k mile circumfrance globe?
My personal observations prove there is no curvature. Boats dissappear past the vanishing point of our vision. Long distance photographs prove there is no curvature.
The globe psyop is the aim to make us believe in the heliocentric model. Like evolution, the intent of the globe belief is to make us believe there is no creator.
If you really want to wake to reality read The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion. And read the Talmud. That will keep you busy for a while if you have the stomach for it.
I loved this rabbit hole because it made me look back to that time and how I viewed the world, young, fresh out of law school, glued to the tv set, eating up everything that was fed to me. How is it possible I was ever that person, but of course I was. Believing so passionately in the narrative.. in people “in charge.” I feel regret that I was swept away so fervently by those manipulating everything.
Ah! Haven't listened to the whole video yet--but you've just "spilled the beans" on the plot 'secret'! Video was taking too long to "get there." I need to finish watching, though, to know all the details-- after I'm done with my morning appointment.
So, how does this information tie in with the fact that the Kardashian girls soon became the symbol of LA sexy/cool/trash/degeneration/whatever, and their dad Bruce Jenner aka "Caitlin" became the face of the trans "woman"/trans movement?
Interesting! Just like the book "Chaos" has indicated that the CIA visited the site of the Sharon Tate murders before the police showed up. None of this was know until many years later.
So I didn't pay a great deal of attention to the O.J.Simpson mess, only because I'm not American, and don't watch any news programs. But learning what a debacle, a circus, lies upon lies and manipulation the whole thing was means I feel a bit ill, as I do with the manipulation by BLM around George Floyd's death, and the resulting trial of an innocent police man. Feel like we humans are walking around with multiple stories slamming into each other, careening about us to cause mayhem and manipulate everything single we do.
I vividly remember the OJ verdict being handed down. This was long before I got “red pilled” (ie. I totally swallowed the establishment 9/11 narrative shortly thereafter) and I was convinced at the time that OJ was guilty as sin.
Now… I feel rudderless.
I see that someone else has posted about the CIA tampering with the Sharon Tate crime scene as well. Nothing would surprise me at this point… given the obvious “establishment” manipulation of the Laurel Canyon music scene in the 1960’s.
After reading the Wasz story I am left with what I think I thought at the time of the horrible murder of OJ wife and friend: a horrifying outcome for 2 people I could not care about --I did not know them. The media would not let anyone, who owned a television, NOT watch at least some of the spectacle that took place over a long period of time. We were to draw one of 2 conclusions: OJ killed his wife and friend from jealous rage -he did after beat hear more than once; we saw pictures, remember. Or we were racists. I don't remember anything about Mr. Kardashian's involvement-- what a sleaze.
Celia's story for Esquire kind of made me wonder. Hmmm. The bottom line here is how the minds of the onlooking public were used to do some mindf---ing.
If I remember correctly from Dave McGowan's exceptional 'programmed to kill' the small calibre weapon 0.25 or 0.22 was the weapon of choice for assassins; also that many of these professional hits were then disguised as (or attributed to) the work of 'serial killers' - many of which, after all, were MK subjects (see also Phoenix in Vietnam). It doesn't surprise me in the slightest that they spend so much energy misdirecting people's attention away from this kind of stuff. Likewise the fact that the courts, the police, the media and so on were all captured to the extent that the truth never emerged, even when the details of these trials were so full of absurdities and false confessions and the like.
An even further misdirection, imho, is far more recent and is known as the 'fake events' narrative. I am beginning to conclude that this fake events narrative really is the mother of all psyops... It makes us doubt even history itself, let alone science. Cognitive dissonance etc. For once we can no longer trust history or historical records then they are free to rewrite it to their hearts content and tell us whatever they want about it.
And given the sheer number of fake photos etc. they've manufactured precisely for this purpose, it seems clear they've put a hell of a lot of effort into this one. And the fact they are targeting conspiracy theorists with it (the so-called truth movement, or whatever you want to call it - let's just call it a resistance) is somewhat revealing, imho. Normal people aren't interested in this kind of thing, after all, and will never really see any fake photos. So this is about a controlled opposition, imo. And misdirection.
The fact it was a .25 calibre tells me all I need to know...
Here is Dr. John Watson talking about his friend Mr. Sherlock Holmes:
"His ignorance was as remarkable as his knowledge. Of contemporary literature, philosophy and politics he appeared to know next to nothing. Upon my quoting Thomas Carlyle, he inquired in the naivest way who he might be and what he had done. My surprise reached a climax, however, when I found incidentally that he was ignorant of the Copernican Theory and of the composition of the Solar System. That any civilized human being in this nineteenth century should not be aware that the earth travelled round the sun appeared to be to me such an extraordinary fact that I could hardly realize it.
“You appear to be astonished,” he said, smiling at my expression of surprise. “Now that I do know it I shall do my best to forget it.”
“To forget it!”
“You see,” he explained, “I consider that a man’s brain originally is like a little empty attic, and you have to stock it with such furniture as you choose. A fool takes in all the lumber of every sort that he comes across, so that the knowledge which might be useful to him gets crowded out, or at best is jumbled up with a lot of other things so that he has a difficulty in laying his hands upon it. Now the skillful workman is very careful indeed as to what he takes into his brain-attic. He will have nothing but the tools which may help him in doing his work, but of these he has a large assortment, and all in the most perfect order. It is a mistake to think that that little room has elastic walls and can distend to any extent. Depend upon it there comes a time when for every addition of knowledge you forget something that you knew before. It is of the highest importance, therefore, not to have useless facts elbowing out the useful ones.”
“But the Solar System!” I protested.
“What the deuce is it to me?” he interrupted impatiently; “you say that we go round the sun. If we went round the moon it would not make a pennyworth of difference to me or to my work.”
Of course the prevailing ignorance accepts the notion we have been spoon-fed about the Solar System. Most accept the lies we have been told without personal investigation. Those of us who bother to investigate the spoon-fed narratives begin to notice inconsistencies in the fairy tales. Through questioning, investigating and reasoning, another possibility emerges. One not consistent with prevailing assumptions.
How many things have we been told by "authorities" have turned out to be incorrect? If one says none, either that person has not questioned anything he's been told, or he is the proud possessor of a sub K-9 IQ.
The question of the Solar System was very much in doubt during Sherlock Holmes's fictional lifetime. Sir Arther Coynan Doyle's model of the Solar System expressed by Watson was thinking consistent with what the "authorities" of the time told us, and that same "thinking" (if I dare call it that), prevails today. It is what we are taught, and few bother to investigate.
Here are a few proofs if you want to investigate FE. Or you could try to prove the globe model to yourself. That would be harder as if it were possible some intelligent soul would be three Bitcoins richer. https://archive.org/details/200ProofsEarthIsNotASpinningBall_201710
I will investigate these proofs in a day or two when I have time.
I've already validated the globe model and the existence of gravity in a practical sense (without knowing why it appears to exist) to my own satisfaction, and I've rejected the flat earth model as untenable, but I'll do some checks on htese things, because I realize I am the easiest person to fool.
While pondering how many things we've been told by "authorities" that turned out to be incorrect, we might also entertain the thought that some of the things we've been told by them have turned out to be totally correct, such as that small change can sometimes be found by rummaging under armchair and settee cushions. It would be a cognitive mistake to rule something out just because you heard about it from an "authority". I expect there are tons of correct notions that you've been spoon-fed and that have turned out to be correct.
Perhaps. But you must admit that secret societies exist to keep secrets. Those on top of these connected societies don't care one iota for you and me. Committee of 300. That kind of stuff. Could NASA be one big psyop designed to direct money to secret projects? What aren't they telling us? Is it legit to lie to us?
Invasion of Eden is Paul Wallis's latest book. Apparently alien disclosure is coming. That should be interesting.
My theory on aliens is they exist beyond the ice wall where we are not allowed to go. They don't come from other planets. They may not look like us, but air and water like ours must be critical to them as it is to us.
The book's premise is they have been here before and they are coming back. And they have technology that has been kept from us. Tesla kind of stuff.
Isn't it a shame that just as we realize history has been chewed up and spit out and would make for great conversations (well, once upon a time true), most of our friends have lost their ability to think and people are generally unwilling to discuss anything of depth. It has taught me the truth of the prayer "God grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change...the courage to change the things I can...and the wisdom to know the difference."
In Canada decades ago a man, Marc Lepine, murdered 14 women at a Quebec engineering school. For decades he was held up as a typical male representing misogynistic Canadian men everywhere. What we found out, and for me at least, decades later, was ‘Marc Lepine’ was not his original name. His original name was Gamil Gharbi. His father was Islamic and he had been schooled in a madrassa. This was an Islamic man hating women were taking positions in engineering schools that he and other men should have taken. It was Islam. Everything is a lie.
The world we live in is a psyop. It is designed to keep us on rails; in tunnels. The psyop directs us to make binary choices. Guilty or not guilty. Trump or Biden. Virus or no virus. Round or flat. Pro-choice or pro-life. Pro-gun or anti-gun. God or no god? Christian God or Muslim God? The truth is that each of us creates our reality based upon how we perceive the world around us. Each of us has the choice to step back and look at the stories and issues that are fed to us as dispassionate observers. When you are presented with an issue ask yourself questions like, "How does this affect my life? If I had never heard this story would it matter? Does it make my life or my outlook on life better or worse? Can I change anything regarding this issue? Why am I being fed information that has no bearing on my day-to-day? Who gains from keeping me in this frame of mind?" Over the past couple of months I have taken a vacation from the news, political podcasts, etc. and dedicated myself to asking questions. What have I decided? Most of this shit doesn't even matter.
I was really entrenched in the O.J. saga. I watched a lot of the trial. I had strong opinions that OJ was guilty. I have friends who were detectives at LAPD at the time who have strong opinions. But in the end, does it matter who killed two people that none of us know? Whether Ron Goldman and Nicole Simpson lived or died, it had no bearing on my life, but because they died, I wasted many hours of my life thinking about it, and time is something we can never get back.
Im using your questions.
I thought about this story and others later. So much wasted time --
the 70s album titles: Grand Illusion and All the Wold’s a Stage told us,but we had to live it first hand
My feelings exactly! Very well stated.
I read an article about ten years ago (?) in perhaps The Guardian that said Just Quit the News. He argued exactly what you are arguing. It has no bearing on your life, the news is designed to get you upset, angry or emotional, you can't change any of it anyway, the notion of 'being informed' is quaint and irrelevant. Not once did he use the word PsyOp, my memory is that he called it a con--but the article really stuck with me. Just skimming this mornings headlines and uttering I can't do this, I can't read this, and then reading your comment reminds me of this article.
Psyops. Some declare that Flat Earth is a psyop. To the contrary, the moon landings were psyops.
Flat earth could be a psyop whether or not the moon landings were fake (they were).
In Isaiah 40:22, it is written, "It is he that sitteth upon the circle of the earth..." The book of Isaiah gives credence to the concept of the earth being round like a sphere. The Flat Earth concept came from the Mesopotamians and were held by pre-Socratic philosophers.
@Josie: how can we know what is meant by "the circle of the earth"? a circle is round, but is not the same as a sphere, and this has to do with the difference between 2D (a circle) and 3D (a sphere). in maths we're taught to calculate a circle's area (remember pi?) and a sphere's volume.
FE is Biblical Earth.
Webster Dictionary: sphere (sfihr) n. a globe; a round body. 1. Geometry. A solid body which in every part is equally distant from its center. 2. An orb; globe; a round body. 3. Range; compass; province. 4. The heavens, - v. [sphered] To give complete and perfect form.
so: according to the Isaiah 40:22 text "...he sitteth upon the circle of the earth..." and not on the "sphere of the earth" << thanks to Webster Dict. we can now agree that it refers to a circular = flat "circle of the erath", not a round body/globe. Biblical Earth is flat and circular, and the ideas of a flat earth, nót a spinning ball is Biblical Earth.
And Romans says that god chooses elected politicians so you must revere them. Believe that too?
@ Josie: yes to the second half of your comment (pre-Socrates etc), no to the first: a circle is flat, a spere would be round (globe).
"Round like a sphere?" Why didn't he say sphere? Planes can also be round. Circles are not spheres. Seems everyone has a Bible verse to prove their point on the subject.
We have tools to make observations today (think laser beams) that the ancients who wrote the Bible did not have.
And here are some Bible versus for you.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/XAEbjmTsJRva/
Webster Dictionary: sphere (sfihr) n. a globe; a round body. 1. Geometry. A solid body which in every part is equally distant from its center. 2. An orb; globe; a round body. 3. Range; compass; province. 4. The heavens, - v. [sphered] To give complete and perfect form.
Why do you say that? Is truth unimportant to you?
Some discover one truth then realize there are more truths to discover. It takes an initial revelation to get one started.
FE is at the basis of us understanding of our reality. It starts many on their path.
Some start with 911. Some start with the truth about health, especially cancer. Some have come to realize that the Holocaust is a lie.
When we discover that we have been lied to about history, we learn that the authorities are not to be trusted. They lie about everything. Realizing this fact puts us on the path to freeing our minds from the brainwashing we all have been subjected to.
It's always the opposite of what they say, "your vote counts,""hope," "build back better," "make america great again," "safe & effective."
What would you say is the truth about cancer?
That is becoming known by doctors who are investigating cancer and willing to go against the prevailing narrative and risk having their medical licenses revoked.
I suggest you follow Dr. Lee Merritt on her Medical Rebel Rumble channel.
Here is one I posted to my Bitchute channel Red Pilled Revisionaries.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/X4PFBah1VdSX/
Thank you! I am somewhat familiar with the parasite aspect.
So you know then that antiparasitic protocols can be effective against cancer.
Have you worked out the curvature for a 25k mile circumfrance globe?
My personal observations prove there is no curvature. Boats dissappear past the vanishing point of our vision. Long distance photographs prove there is no curvature.
The globe psyop is the aim to make us believe in the heliocentric model. Like evolution, the intent of the globe belief is to make us believe there is no creator.
If you really want to wake to reality read The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion. And read the Talmud. That will keep you busy for a while if you have the stomach for it.
Also research the law of perspective.
Yes, the Earth has mountains, valleys and oceans. But water lays flat. It requires a container. Water cannot curve to a globe.
Photographs of lake reflections of mountains would not be possible if water curved.
For more truths follow my Substack.
https://open.substack.com/pub/kenkrypto/p/truth-is-not-for-everyone?utm_source=share&utm_medium=android&r=4qa41
I loved this rabbit hole because it made me look back to that time and how I viewed the world, young, fresh out of law school, glued to the tv set, eating up everything that was fed to me. How is it possible I was ever that person, but of course I was. Believing so passionately in the narrative.. in people “in charge.” I feel regret that I was swept away so fervently by those manipulating everything.
Ah! Haven't listened to the whole video yet--but you've just "spilled the beans" on the plot 'secret'! Video was taking too long to "get there." I need to finish watching, though, to know all the details-- after I'm done with my morning appointment.
So, how does this information tie in with the fact that the Kardashian girls soon became the symbol of LA sexy/cool/trash/degeneration/whatever, and their dad Bruce Jenner aka "Caitlin" became the face of the trans "woman"/trans movement?
Whorf summed up that clan very succinctly.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GvHGsH5po00
LOL
Interesting! Just like the book "Chaos" has indicated that the CIA visited the site of the Sharon Tate murders before the police showed up. None of this was know until many years later.
So I didn't pay a great deal of attention to the O.J.Simpson mess, only because I'm not American, and don't watch any news programs. But learning what a debacle, a circus, lies upon lies and manipulation the whole thing was means I feel a bit ill, as I do with the manipulation by BLM around George Floyd's death, and the resulting trial of an innocent police man. Feel like we humans are walking around with multiple stories slamming into each other, careening about us to cause mayhem and manipulate everything single we do.
Wow this is like an “LA Confidential” modern noir thriller.
Amazing. And 100% believable. LA is exactly like this.
I am totally lost here.
I vividly remember the OJ verdict being handed down. This was long before I got “red pilled” (ie. I totally swallowed the establishment 9/11 narrative shortly thereafter) and I was convinced at the time that OJ was guilty as sin.
Now… I feel rudderless.
I see that someone else has posted about the CIA tampering with the Sharon Tate crime scene as well. Nothing would surprise me at this point… given the obvious “establishment” manipulation of the Laurel Canyon music scene in the 1960’s.
https://centerforaninformedamerica.com/inside-the-lc-the-strange-but-mostly-true-story-of-laurel-canyon-and-the-birth-of-the-hippie-generation-part-i/
Weird Scenes Inside The Canyon is a great read
I'm going with OJ did it, Earth round and Covid reaction a complete Scam.
Plenty of evidence for each.
I'll pray the scales will fall from your eyes
After reading the Wasz story I am left with what I think I thought at the time of the horrible murder of OJ wife and friend: a horrifying outcome for 2 people I could not care about --I did not know them. The media would not let anyone, who owned a television, NOT watch at least some of the spectacle that took place over a long period of time. We were to draw one of 2 conclusions: OJ killed his wife and friend from jealous rage -he did after beat hear more than once; we saw pictures, remember. Or we were racists. I don't remember anything about Mr. Kardashian's involvement-- what a sleaze.
Celia's story for Esquire kind of made me wonder. Hmmm. The bottom line here is how the minds of the onlooking public were used to do some mindf---ing.
I keep hearing your father’s words “penetrate the ostensible”. Was that it? He made it your superpower.
Actually, YOU made it your superpower. But sounds like he inspired the pursuit.
If I remember correctly from Dave McGowan's exceptional 'programmed to kill' the small calibre weapon 0.25 or 0.22 was the weapon of choice for assassins; also that many of these professional hits were then disguised as (or attributed to) the work of 'serial killers' - many of which, after all, were MK subjects (see also Phoenix in Vietnam). It doesn't surprise me in the slightest that they spend so much energy misdirecting people's attention away from this kind of stuff. Likewise the fact that the courts, the police, the media and so on were all captured to the extent that the truth never emerged, even when the details of these trials were so full of absurdities and false confessions and the like.
An even further misdirection, imho, is far more recent and is known as the 'fake events' narrative. I am beginning to conclude that this fake events narrative really is the mother of all psyops... It makes us doubt even history itself, let alone science. Cognitive dissonance etc. For once we can no longer trust history or historical records then they are free to rewrite it to their hearts content and tell us whatever they want about it.
And given the sheer number of fake photos etc. they've manufactured precisely for this purpose, it seems clear they've put a hell of a lot of effort into this one. And the fact they are targeting conspiracy theorists with it (the so-called truth movement, or whatever you want to call it - let's just call it a resistance) is somewhat revealing, imho. Normal people aren't interested in this kind of thing, after all, and will never really see any fake photos. So this is about a controlled opposition, imo. And misdirection.
The fact it was a .25 calibre tells me all I need to know...
Here is Dr. John Watson talking about his friend Mr. Sherlock Holmes:
"His ignorance was as remarkable as his knowledge. Of contemporary literature, philosophy and politics he appeared to know next to nothing. Upon my quoting Thomas Carlyle, he inquired in the naivest way who he might be and what he had done. My surprise reached a climax, however, when I found incidentally that he was ignorant of the Copernican Theory and of the composition of the Solar System. That any civilized human being in this nineteenth century should not be aware that the earth travelled round the sun appeared to be to me such an extraordinary fact that I could hardly realize it.
“You appear to be astonished,” he said, smiling at my expression of surprise. “Now that I do know it I shall do my best to forget it.”
“To forget it!”
“You see,” he explained, “I consider that a man’s brain originally is like a little empty attic, and you have to stock it with such furniture as you choose. A fool takes in all the lumber of every sort that he comes across, so that the knowledge which might be useful to him gets crowded out, or at best is jumbled up with a lot of other things so that he has a difficulty in laying his hands upon it. Now the skillful workman is very careful indeed as to what he takes into his brain-attic. He will have nothing but the tools which may help him in doing his work, but of these he has a large assortment, and all in the most perfect order. It is a mistake to think that that little room has elastic walls and can distend to any extent. Depend upon it there comes a time when for every addition of knowledge you forget something that you knew before. It is of the highest importance, therefore, not to have useless facts elbowing out the useful ones.”
“But the Solar System!” I protested.
“What the deuce is it to me?” he interrupted impatiently; “you say that we go round the sun. If we went round the moon it would not make a pennyworth of difference to me or to my work.”
Of course the prevailing ignorance accepts the notion we have been spoon-fed about the Solar System. Most accept the lies we have been told without personal investigation. Those of us who bother to investigate the spoon-fed narratives begin to notice inconsistencies in the fairy tales. Through questioning, investigating and reasoning, another possibility emerges. One not consistent with prevailing assumptions.
How many things have we been told by "authorities" have turned out to be incorrect? If one says none, either that person has not questioned anything he's been told, or he is the proud possessor of a sub K-9 IQ.
The question of the Solar System was very much in doubt during Sherlock Holmes's fictional lifetime. Sir Arther Coynan Doyle's model of the Solar System expressed by Watson was thinking consistent with what the "authorities" of the time told us, and that same "thinking" (if I dare call it that), prevails today. It is what we are taught, and few bother to investigate.
Here are a few proofs if you want to investigate FE. Or you could try to prove the globe model to yourself. That would be harder as if it were possible some intelligent soul would be three Bitcoins richer. https://archive.org/details/200ProofsEarthIsNotASpinningBall_201710
I will investigate these proofs in a day or two when I have time.
I've already validated the globe model and the existence of gravity in a practical sense (without knowing why it appears to exist) to my own satisfaction, and I've rejected the flat earth model as untenable, but I'll do some checks on htese things, because I realize I am the easiest person to fool.
While pondering how many things we've been told by "authorities" that turned out to be incorrect, we might also entertain the thought that some of the things we've been told by them have turned out to be totally correct, such as that small change can sometimes be found by rummaging under armchair and settee cushions. It would be a cognitive mistake to rule something out just because you heard about it from an "authority". I expect there are tons of correct notions that you've been spoon-fed and that have turned out to be correct.
Perhaps. But you must admit that secret societies exist to keep secrets. Those on top of these connected societies don't care one iota for you and me. Committee of 300. That kind of stuff. Could NASA be one big psyop designed to direct money to secret projects? What aren't they telling us? Is it legit to lie to us?
Invasion of Eden is Paul Wallis's latest book. Apparently alien disclosure is coming. That should be interesting.
My theory on aliens is they exist beyond the ice wall where we are not allowed to go. They don't come from other planets. They may not look like us, but air and water like ours must be critical to them as it is to us.
The book's premise is they have been here before and they are coming back. And they have technology that has been kept from us. Tesla kind of stuff.
Isn't it a shame that just as we realize history has been chewed up and spit out and would make for great conversations (well, once upon a time true), most of our friends have lost their ability to think and people are generally unwilling to discuss anything of depth. It has taught me the truth of the prayer "God grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change...the courage to change the things I can...and the wisdom to know the difference."
'serenity' is such a beautiful concept, thank you!
about this for a psyops? A positive one, possibly the greatest deception of them all?
https://newzealanddoc.substack.com/p/lets-talk-about-the-moon?utm_campaign=reaction&utm_medium=email&utm_source=substack&utm_content=post
In Canada decades ago a man, Marc Lepine, murdered 14 women at a Quebec engineering school. For decades he was held up as a typical male representing misogynistic Canadian men everywhere. What we found out, and for me at least, decades later, was ‘Marc Lepine’ was not his original name. His original name was Gamil Gharbi. His father was Islamic and he had been schooled in a madrassa. This was an Islamic man hating women were taking positions in engineering schools that he and other men should have taken. It was Islam. Everything is a lie.