Sept 3. [I was asked to put two posts back--here is one of the two)
I have produced this statement to my friend Celia into a full Substack post
Who is Eric Coppolino? --- has anyone checked him out? -- I mean REALLY CHECKED HIM OUT?
having multiple rabbit trails that polarize and then compete for each other and sow confusion among the masses is a good way to escape for the criminals
I am sure harmony will come from this. You expressed how shaken you felt after hearing that someone you had listened to, who seemed to be honestly expressing themselves, had apparently being lying about verifiable things.
This is happening to all of us every single day in our online world where people and ideas pop up and down and come and go all the time. There is truth in what people say, though they may have completely different 'agendas' to us.
I think it's important to remember that 'they' totally control the narrative.
No wonder we find this unsettling and frustrating.
Perhaps we should all unhook. Jack out of the matrix for good.
I'm going to a no phones, no internet silent retreat next week, I was told to stop meat, dairy, alcohol, drugs, refined sugar, smoking and caffeine for a week before so the detox won't spoil my experience. I don't consume any of these things.
What I will find very hard is not looking at this dread machine every other hour!
Pacifica Radio? I'll need a lot more than Coppolino on Pacifica, and from other sources, to put me off Dr. Wagh.
1.) Where is the reference sample of SARS CoV 2?
2.) Why take a jab that does not provide immunity nor prevent one from passing their flu-like condition onto someone else?
These questions have not been answered. The Covid Experience has been a con since day one.
Pretty sure that, if virology is a scam, a degree in virology doesn't mean much.
Who’s right. Who’s wrong. Who’s misrepresenting themselves. Who’s Coo Coo for Cocoa Puffs. Like most, I want the curtain pulled back. The truth revealed.
While everyones opining, the COVID VAX train is chugging along on track… and arriving promptly in a town near you this fall. Stopping it is my biggest concern.
Though I've taken all the prerequisite courses, I have no degree in software development or data science, yet that's what I do for a living. I produce excellent solutions. I also have no degree in English, but have tested above the 99.5 percentile. I have no published papers, but Poornima does: https://academictree.org/cellbio/publications.php?pid=247698
This all seems like elaborate theater in order to discredit anyone who doesn't swallow the mainstream narrative horse s***.
Meanwhile, all we have are ad hominem and appeal to authority logical fallacies.
Mr. Coppolino’s details about Poornima’s fake degrees convinced me. She is a fraud or appears to be one (if the name is correctly spelled), and the worst damage to us is what Celia pointed out.
Unity is at stake here.
The fact that Poornima is a fake does not mean that the concept that the covid virus does not exist is wrong. Much less should the numerous doctors and scientists supporting that idea based on Koch’s postulates be placed in the same sentence with the fraudulent scientist. Poornima should be irrelevant, and a united front should stand.
Celia’s point is the most critical and infinitely more important than a probable plant from the dark forces that permeate our world today. Wagh’s job was to inject conflict, and she has succeeded so far.
But, you can end that now and focus everyone’s attention on the current war for our lives.
Most readers know the following steps, but I put them here as a reminder of what we should focus on now.
(1) The microorganism must be found in diseased but not healthy individuals;
(2) The microorganism must be cultured from the diseased individual;
(3) Inoculation of a healthy individual with the cultured microorganism must recapitulate the disease;
(4) The microorganism must be re-isolated from the inoculated, diseased individual and matched to the original microorganism.
“Koch’s postulates have been critically important in establishing the criteria whereby the scientific community agrees that a microorganism causes a disease.” (Segre, 2013)
If you disagree with the above postulates please state why.
Segre JA. What does it take to satisfy Koch’s postulates two centuries later? Microbial genomics and Propionibacteria acnes. J Invest Dermatol. 2013 Sep;133(9):2141-2. doi: 10.1038/jid.2013.260. Epub 2013 Jul 11. PMID: 23842116; PMCID: PMC3775492.
Was Poornima Wagh anywhere near the book depository or dealey plaza at the time of her dissertation defenses? How can we ensure she never works again in any field? When and where will they host her virology struggle sessions?
The agents of chaos never sleep. "conspiracy theorist!"
The "in silico" sequences were dodgy for me at once--NEJM publishing alleged sequences "provided by the Chinese" (?!) about "their" "Covid" bug or whatever. No actual "virus isolation" done -- all was about "the gene sequences." Anyway, you know about all that, what you and I and so many others discussed in early to mid- 2020.
My own little red flag was (as I posted in your other article a few days back) her sweeping comment demolishing the entirety of Pathology as "all false". I beg your pardon?
Dr. Lee Merritt is loath to criticize almost anyone she has had on her show. E.g, Bryan Ardis: she did raise the doubts others told her about Ardis and his "snake venom" theory, but never actually disowned him, whom she said was "a good friend". Not surprised she's defending Wagh, as claimed by Coppolino, although I've personally not heard/read what she's said yet. Not heard of Coppolino till this issue came up, either.
I really haven't kept up with any of the new supposedly "anti-covidian" personae in the last several months, now just exhausted at the continuing "revelations" that tell me nothing different or new from what I'd already learned by the end of 2021.
Anyway, spending no more time in the maelstrom. Just more narcissistic commenting from me, LOL.
So why is this accused sexual pervert, Eric F. Coppolino, so focused on Poornima Wagh? I also have an email from the Student Records office at the LSHTM and it does not say that Poornima never attended that school. It says they cannot release that information without a written, signed, mailed letter from Ms. Wagh giving the school permission to release her information. And she needs to write a letter for each and every person that wants her information from that school. That is a bit different than she never attended. I have been doing a lot of behind the scenes digging myself and as far as I am concerned Coppolino and his friends, including apparently you too Celia should spend your time going after the real criminals that are killing people and now will be killing our children. I smell a big fat rat in all of this and his fixation on her makes me believe he has a hidden agenda. Poornima made it very clear that she will never work in the science field again and that has been something she has known long before she did her interview with Regis Tremblay. The CDC took care of that for her just like the NIH did to Dr. Mikovits. I pray that India publishes the research paper from Poornima and her team. Coppolino also recorded a phone conversation with Ms. Wagh and published it without even the decency of asking Poornima if she was ok with that. That is dirty and low life. I listened to that entire conversation and he acted as if they were best of friends. Just in case you were not aware of his accused perverted behavior let me share some information. Anyone that associates with him is not someone I could ever respect and I am sure a lot of others will feel the same way. https://hudsonvalleyone.com/2018/08/04/metoo-comes-to-town/ I think we might have more to fear from Coppolino than Poornima Wagh. It appears you Subscribers have a lot more discernment than you seem to possess.
Why would you attack a low-level fraud, when there are much bigger frauds roaming around killing millions? Poornima Wagh may have some issues that made her misrepresent her background, but she is no authority in the field, with or without a Ph.D., and in no position to do harm. I hope this public shaming will not make her unemployable.
I used to read Eric Francis' (Coppolino) astrology blog years ago (I too am an astrologer) and it got so dark and sleazy I said no more. Then, it seems, out of nowhere, from the ashes of the fallout of the scamdemic, he's back on my radar...and the need arose to refresh my memory about why I stepped away from the gloom of that portal.
If this is the character of the "new improved journalism" we are in even deeper doo doo than I can fully imagine.
Everything points to this woman being a fraud. She has the means to prove herself legit yet refuses. This does not represent the destruction of the Covid Expose movement, rather the opposite. I have no attachment to the outcome one way or another, but some of you do, and are obviously taking this personally, and engaging in character attacks against those questioning her. Emotional investment in a scientific position clearly skews objectivity.