Women behaving badly still has shock value. The men are the controlled opposition operating behind the scenes and the women are now the shock troops. This kind of behaviour is sick. But I bet it is well paid - by a MAN.
Thus the prevalence of so many transmen in the media...and now we're learning that it's been going on a long time. Changing women's perception of themselves!
I agree that she likely receives her propaganda pay packet from a man. But rather than the sex of her paymaster, is it not more pertinent to determine the ideological bent and motives of the particular individual man? As fellow followers of Miss Celia, I expect we would be natural allies regardless of outward appearance. I hope you and family have a great 2024.
Why do you make this comment? Men and women were made by God, and are intended to live in harmony. When we fulfil our purpose we complement each other perfectly and each enhances the other.
In my experience neither sex owns a monopoly on either good or evil. Surely fostering division, and seeking to denigrate one sex over the other is harmful to everyone?
I'm looking forward to your elucidation of Monarch programming. I am a psychologist and can tell you that what was considered psychology up until 2020 bears no resemblance to the psychology that actually holds sway over human life in modern western societies. The real story, the man behind the curtain, is in the psy-ops, the way human psychology has been perverted and weaponized against us. I really appreciate your insights and knowledge on this score, Celia.
If you want to take a deep dive, check out books by Cathy O'Brien, starting with Trance Formation of America. Cathy is an outspoken and eloquent Monarch survivor.
CIA MK Ultra program was a series of programs during the cold war era to research and experiment with various forms of mind control. They had labs and would give patients electroshock therapy, or give them LSD and make them listen to recorded messages for days on end. It was all very sordid and essentially a continuation of the Nazi experiments (project Paperclip etc). Clinton formally apologised for it in the early 90's (?) after a bunch of hearings and the program was 'officially closed down'.
Monarch was one of the branches of the program, based around the brain's natural (survival) capacity to compartmentalise trauma - eg having no conscious memory of a horrific car accident or childhood abuse. Apparently, this facility of the brain can be exploited to essentially split victims into various altars and program them, or store information in them and this is achieved by having a handler systematically traumatise them (like torture and stuff).
Different alters can then supposedly be 'brought forward' with special triggers and key words. The illusionist Derren Brown has shown this facility of the brain to great effect in his TV shows (well worth watching). I believe even the ancient Egyptians experimented with it too.
Long story short... it's been claimed that many celebs and public figures (from presidents to business owners to spies) are mind controlled and that the first 'on display' mind control victim was Marilyn Monroe - a woman who was completely detached from all family/ friends and surrounded by doctors/ psychiatrists (ie handlers). Monroe helped to normalise the 'dazed, dissociated and shallow' celeb template which is now the norm - but which also is indicative of being a mind control slave (often a sex slave).
Many celebs seem to try and break away from their handlers (Brittany Spears is a classic example) only to be bundled off to 'rehab' (often the same rehab) for a few months and then reappearing with a dazed look on their faces. Many celebs have been filmed 'rebooting' or apparently switching alters, also suggesting Monarch mind control - or at the very least a life surrounded by abusive handlers who pump them full of drugs and control them like abusive spouses.
In a broader context, disaster events like 911 or covid lockdowns serve to traumatise the public at large, especially the way they are presented on the TV news (fear porn). This also creates (to a lesser extent) a kind of dissociated population who can easily be triggered with various cues (words/ images) to behave a certain way (we're all in this together/ stay safe / no one is safe until we're all safe etc). The masked zombies of 2020/ 2021 were clearly under a mild form of mind control from being traumatised by 24/7 TV fear porn. They became compliant, vacant, robotic, dissociated - much like many celebs.
Terms like 'Monarch' and 'mind control' get banded about quite loosely on the internet, but there does seem to be enough evidence that it is a real thing. Although, IMHO a lot of the time we are just witnessing people under a 'more casual' form of mind control, rather than the full blown MK Ultra stuff.
Also the Gen Alpha's seem to have integrated the concept into their goth/ emo identities.... you know, turning it into another trendy affliction to be a victim of.
A lot of celebs and public figures get photographed with very specific symbolism, which is said to indicate some form of mind control (or general control by handlers and very restrictive contracts with Hollywood/ the Music Biz).
Symbolism involving butterflies, specifically the Monarch butterfly is said to indicate they are under Monarch MC programming. Obviously, butterflies are a common symbol in tattoos, jewellery and fashion - but when you find the same symbol being used over and over it starts to look a bit blatant.
Very good capsulated explanation. Though I was aware of the term ‘Monarch’ and that it had to do with mind control and the CIA Mk Ultra Program. But a good overview.
FYI, Celia seems to be mixing up the Monarch program for the Mockingbird program, which deliberately uses the mass media to spread disinformation and deliberate falsehoods funded by intelligence agencies.
Not really. The banshee is obviously on-screen psychotic, i. e., under the influence. Monarch could be a source of it. Mockingbird would be more reassured, not batshit crazy.
The Monarch program attempted to create subject with alternate personalities or DID by raping and torturing small children. It was done scientifically since between the ages of three to about four maybe five, a child has enough cognitive ability but the nervous system is not yet set to allow for the mechanism for alternate personalities to be implanted. Keep in mind these programs were mostly carried out on military bases and psychiatric hospitals. It quickly turned into the pornography industry and although the actual Monarch program was considered unsuccessful, pornography as entrainment was and is wildly successful. Multiple personalites as the result of rape and torture can only be achieved in children. Hypnosis, drugs and other alleged modalites in adults is just a diversionary tactic. Of course, people prefer to believe these things didn't happen but child trafficking is a global epidemic and is deeply imbedded in international networks.
https://survivorship.org/survivorship-webinar-2022-healing-the-unimaginable-a-ten-session-course/ If you're in the psychotherapeutic industry, here's an overview of ritual abuse, which is the basis of Monarch programming. Allison Miller is a retired therapist in Vancouver and probably one of the best writers for understanding the extent and purpose of ritual abuse even in the context of the government programs post WWII.
Not surprised. Rfk jr acted like a fool with Crystal Ball of all people lol. He also said that the Palestinians are one of the most pampered groups. That's clearly insanity.
These fanatics of a religion and it's "law" clearly have no ability to understand human rights.
Like all cults, they see outsiders as lower than them.
That's why they support a genocide happening before their eyes.
Thanks for this. The quiet calibre of Middle East Eye has truly been an - eye opener these past few months. And yes, I see no reason to not suspect that those substances pushed into muscle have interfered with basic personality.
(Sorry - are we allowed to swear in substack? Sorry, Celia!)
That was absolutely atrocious - what a disgusting woman.
Reminds me of Candace Owens’ recent video about women claiming victimhood and then walking into the world almost completely naked, yelling “Stop staring at me!”: they think, simply by virtue of existing, that they have a right to inflict themselves (aka abuse) on those around them, sans consequences.
There’s a phrase comes to mind, something about cold-cocking or some such thing.
I think the lesson to be learned here is if someone is trying to publicly humiliate someone and treating them like garbage because they have a different opinion, that person should instantly lose any and all credibility.
I consider this to one small moment in time that was captured and will remain a wonderful example of her inability to not give emotion purchase on her perspective. If we wish to see this daily we only need to turn on “The View”. That show is the eternal embodiment of this type of haranguing of a guest. I was unable to watch the whole above interview simply because it offends the senses in short order
This is part of the ritualistic infantilization of adult women of the liberal West. Or keeping a part of women's psyche permanently underage. Like a 10 year old girl who lives only to impress her Father, the Monarch, and satisfy what she thinks he desires. When this girl abuses other people, she thinks her father will be happy. This twisted behavior, which is already a bad behavior in the young, is essential to the TV business. A woman in TV will probably behave abusively in some way. Some do it even off-camera, with the staff. But this kind of interviews is where this behavior is more concentrated.
This has been the norm for decades, hosts berating wrong think or speech (different than theirs) because they can't refute them, adopted after gotcha journalism got too expensive. Research, who needs it? Just yell and use the mute button.
Conversation is meaningful only when both parties are open to sharing opinions. Sharing means unobstructed flow in both directions.
If information flows in one direction only, without the option to respond or allow the other party to respond, we call it “teaching”. In both meanings, one positive, as a transfer of knowledge to empower the other (giving energy), and the other negative, as an act of manipulating the other party into changing his/her behavior (taking away the possibility of expressing energy). Positive and negative in this context stand for polarization, as with batteries, and do not qualify the act morally or psychologically.
Energy can flow only in one direction at any time. The art of conversation is about respecting this natural order. Genuine media people are aware of this dynamics.
This natural order may be easily disturbed by expressing requests or questions to the other party and preventing his/her reply by behavioral interference. The reply may also be made impossible through the use of words, phrases or meanings deliberately chosen to disable the possibility of dialogue. Both these measures are commonly used in family fights.
The media are paid by viewers or listeners. Taking money from them and delivering in return a pointless stream of raised voice offending the interlocutor is a disgrace. The subject of the “conversation” is irrelevant.
What is so curious to me is that JHB was one of the sane voices early on in the nonsense.
She was vigorously anti-lockdown protocols - especially when it became clear that politicians were entirely exempt from them, and it was ever more obviously a game of make-believe at tremendous cost.
She was cogent and - though passionate, intense, and yes, caustic at times - seemed to do her due diligence in reporting.
I do not know her injection status, but something seems seriously off with her behavior. I'm sorry to see this, and it saddens me - given how different her presentation is now from what it was in 2020. This is not who she was 3 years ago.
It’s a theatre for us profane cattle. Julia had an early role as a lockdown sceptic but she fell in to line and promoted the lethal injections just like 99% of the other puppets on the idiot box d
They all get instructions on what role to play in the current production. I can only assume her role as being against lockdowns was to get people to trust her, relate to what she's said...only to now, hope that that following will still be held under her influence in the current act (Israel/Palentine war). I see the same psy-op with Elon Musk being a "good guy", free speech and all that. They're playing the long game and always have.
I have seen poor interviewers but none have ever been as bad and disrespectful as her. Her other interviews are not munch better - does anyone actually bother to watch her show
I don't watch interviews, as I find most of them incredibly boring. They invariably tiptoe (or tap dance) around the edges of the issue they are pretending to dissect.
Women behaving badly still has shock value. The men are the controlled opposition operating behind the scenes and the women are now the shock troops. This kind of behaviour is sick. But I bet it is well paid - by a MAN.
Thus the prevalence of so many transmen in the media...and now we're learning that it's been going on a long time. Changing women's perception of themselves!
I agree that she likely receives her propaganda pay packet from a man. But rather than the sex of her paymaster, is it not more pertinent to determine the ideological bent and motives of the particular individual man? As fellow followers of Miss Celia, I expect we would be natural allies regardless of outward appearance. I hope you and family have a great 2024.
Why do you make this comment? Men and women were made by God, and are intended to live in harmony. When we fulfil our purpose we complement each other perfectly and each enhances the other.
In my experience neither sex owns a monopoly on either good or evil. Surely fostering division, and seeking to denigrate one sex over the other is harmful to everyone?
I'm looking forward to your elucidation of Monarch programming. I am a psychologist and can tell you that what was considered psychology up until 2020 bears no resemblance to the psychology that actually holds sway over human life in modern western societies. The real story, the man behind the curtain, is in the psy-ops, the way human psychology has been perverted and weaponized against us. I really appreciate your insights and knowledge on this score, Celia.
If you want to take a deep dive, check out books by Cathy O'Brien, starting with Trance Formation of America. Cathy is an outspoken and eloquent Monarch survivor.
https://trance-formation.com/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rq6QcmBQbhg
Please can someone explain what is ‘Monarch’ in this context, I see it a lot recently and don’t understand its meaning.
CIA MK Ultra program was a series of programs during the cold war era to research and experiment with various forms of mind control. They had labs and would give patients electroshock therapy, or give them LSD and make them listen to recorded messages for days on end. It was all very sordid and essentially a continuation of the Nazi experiments (project Paperclip etc). Clinton formally apologised for it in the early 90's (?) after a bunch of hearings and the program was 'officially closed down'.
Monarch was one of the branches of the program, based around the brain's natural (survival) capacity to compartmentalise trauma - eg having no conscious memory of a horrific car accident or childhood abuse. Apparently, this facility of the brain can be exploited to essentially split victims into various altars and program them, or store information in them and this is achieved by having a handler systematically traumatise them (like torture and stuff).
Different alters can then supposedly be 'brought forward' with special triggers and key words. The illusionist Derren Brown has shown this facility of the brain to great effect in his TV shows (well worth watching). I believe even the ancient Egyptians experimented with it too.
Long story short... it's been claimed that many celebs and public figures (from presidents to business owners to spies) are mind controlled and that the first 'on display' mind control victim was Marilyn Monroe - a woman who was completely detached from all family/ friends and surrounded by doctors/ psychiatrists (ie handlers). Monroe helped to normalise the 'dazed, dissociated and shallow' celeb template which is now the norm - but which also is indicative of being a mind control slave (often a sex slave).
Many celebs seem to try and break away from their handlers (Brittany Spears is a classic example) only to be bundled off to 'rehab' (often the same rehab) for a few months and then reappearing with a dazed look on their faces. Many celebs have been filmed 'rebooting' or apparently switching alters, also suggesting Monarch mind control - or at the very least a life surrounded by abusive handlers who pump them full of drugs and control them like abusive spouses.
In a broader context, disaster events like 911 or covid lockdowns serve to traumatise the public at large, especially the way they are presented on the TV news (fear porn). This also creates (to a lesser extent) a kind of dissociated population who can easily be triggered with various cues (words/ images) to behave a certain way (we're all in this together/ stay safe / no one is safe until we're all safe etc). The masked zombies of 2020/ 2021 were clearly under a mild form of mind control from being traumatised by 24/7 TV fear porn. They became compliant, vacant, robotic, dissociated - much like many celebs.
Terms like 'Monarch' and 'mind control' get banded about quite loosely on the internet, but there does seem to be enough evidence that it is a real thing. Although, IMHO a lot of the time we are just witnessing people under a 'more casual' form of mind control, rather than the full blown MK Ultra stuff.
Also the Gen Alpha's seem to have integrated the concept into their goth/ emo identities.... you know, turning it into another trendy affliction to be a victim of.
A lot of celebs and public figures get photographed with very specific symbolism, which is said to indicate some form of mind control (or general control by handlers and very restrictive contracts with Hollywood/ the Music Biz).
Symbolism involving butterflies, specifically the Monarch butterfly is said to indicate they are under Monarch MC programming. Obviously, butterflies are a common symbol in tattoos, jewellery and fashion - but when you find the same symbol being used over and over it starts to look a bit blatant.
Hope that sheds some light on the term :)
Thank you, yes that does (shed light). Much obliged.
Great explanation!
Very good capsulated explanation. Though I was aware of the term ‘Monarch’ and that it had to do with mind control and the CIA Mk Ultra Program. But a good overview.
For enlightenment, you could watch the Parallax View by Pakula (1974); it has aged extremely well. A Clockwork Orange by Kubrick is also an option.
FYI, Celia seems to be mixing up the Monarch program for the Mockingbird program, which deliberately uses the mass media to spread disinformation and deliberate falsehoods funded by intelligence agencies.
These two programs can co-exist.
Not really. The banshee is obviously on-screen psychotic, i. e., under the influence. Monarch could be a source of it. Mockingbird would be more reassured, not batshit crazy.
The Monarch program attempted to create subject with alternate personalities or DID by raping and torturing small children. It was done scientifically since between the ages of three to about four maybe five, a child has enough cognitive ability but the nervous system is not yet set to allow for the mechanism for alternate personalities to be implanted. Keep in mind these programs were mostly carried out on military bases and psychiatric hospitals. It quickly turned into the pornography industry and although the actual Monarch program was considered unsuccessful, pornography as entrainment was and is wildly successful. Multiple personalites as the result of rape and torture can only be achieved in children. Hypnosis, drugs and other alleged modalites in adults is just a diversionary tactic. Of course, people prefer to believe these things didn't happen but child trafficking is a global epidemic and is deeply imbedded in international networks.
https://survivorship.org/survivorship-webinar-2022-healing-the-unimaginable-a-ten-session-course/ If you're in the psychotherapeutic industry, here's an overview of ritual abuse, which is the basis of Monarch programming. Allison Miller is a retired therapist in Vancouver and probably one of the best writers for understanding the extent and purpose of ritual abuse even in the context of the government programs post WWII.
Not surprised. Rfk jr acted like a fool with Crystal Ball of all people lol. He also said that the Palestinians are one of the most pampered groups. That's clearly insanity.
These fanatics of a religion and it's "law" clearly have no ability to understand human rights.
Like all cults, they see outsiders as lower than them.
That's why they support a genocide happening before their eyes.
A little more on her & this here: https://www.middleeasteye.net/opinion/war-gaza-voices-really-matter-are-journalists-ground
Thanks for sharing this link; that is a most excellent article. I felt like I was listening to one of the last of the few sane people on the planet.
Thanks for this. The quiet calibre of Middle East Eye has truly been an - eye opener these past few months. And yes, I see no reason to not suspect that those substances pushed into muscle have interfered with basic personality.
Great find!
Thank you very much for that link. Site is new to me. Appreciate it.
I couldn't stand to watch beyond the first minute. Nails on chalkboard is ethereal music in comparison. Sorry.
Who the fuck even got through that!?!?
(Sorry - are we allowed to swear in substack? Sorry, Celia!)
That was absolutely atrocious - what a disgusting woman.
Reminds me of Candace Owens’ recent video about women claiming victimhood and then walking into the world almost completely naked, yelling “Stop staring at me!”: they think, simply by virtue of existing, that they have a right to inflict themselves (aka abuse) on those around them, sans consequences.
There’s a phrase comes to mind, something about cold-cocking or some such thing.
Yes, thankfully this platform allows "colorful" language, including the "F" bomb.
🤭😹
I think the lesson to be learned here is if someone is trying to publicly humiliate someone and treating them like garbage because they have a different opinion, that person should instantly lose any and all credibility.
I consider this to one small moment in time that was captured and will remain a wonderful example of her inability to not give emotion purchase on her perspective. If we wish to see this daily we only need to turn on “The View”. That show is the eternal embodiment of this type of haranguing of a guest. I was unable to watch the whole above interview simply because it offends the senses in short order
Her ignorance and "personality" I'm sure preceded her injections. On track for a gig teaching a college "journalism" class.
I agree.
This is part of the ritualistic infantilization of adult women of the liberal West. Or keeping a part of women's psyche permanently underage. Like a 10 year old girl who lives only to impress her Father, the Monarch, and satisfy what she thinks he desires. When this girl abuses other people, she thinks her father will be happy. This twisted behavior, which is already a bad behavior in the young, is essential to the TV business. A woman in TV will probably behave abusively in some way. Some do it even off-camera, with the staff. But this kind of interviews is where this behavior is more concentrated.
This has been the norm for decades, hosts berating wrong think or speech (different than theirs) because they can't refute them, adopted after gotcha journalism got too expensive. Research, who needs it? Just yell and use the mute button.
She looks shot damaged to me.
Conversation is meaningful only when both parties are open to sharing opinions. Sharing means unobstructed flow in both directions.
If information flows in one direction only, without the option to respond or allow the other party to respond, we call it “teaching”. In both meanings, one positive, as a transfer of knowledge to empower the other (giving energy), and the other negative, as an act of manipulating the other party into changing his/her behavior (taking away the possibility of expressing energy). Positive and negative in this context stand for polarization, as with batteries, and do not qualify the act morally or psychologically.
Energy can flow only in one direction at any time. The art of conversation is about respecting this natural order. Genuine media people are aware of this dynamics.
This natural order may be easily disturbed by expressing requests or questions to the other party and preventing his/her reply by behavioral interference. The reply may also be made impossible through the use of words, phrases or meanings deliberately chosen to disable the possibility of dialogue. Both these measures are commonly used in family fights.
The media are paid by viewers or listeners. Taking money from them and delivering in return a pointless stream of raised voice offending the interlocutor is a disgrace. The subject of the “conversation” is irrelevant.
What is so curious to me is that JHB was one of the sane voices early on in the nonsense.
She was vigorously anti-lockdown protocols - especially when it became clear that politicians were entirely exempt from them, and it was ever more obviously a game of make-believe at tremendous cost.
She was cogent and - though passionate, intense, and yes, caustic at times - seemed to do her due diligence in reporting.
I do not know her injection status, but something seems seriously off with her behavior. I'm sorry to see this, and it saddens me - given how different her presentation is now from what it was in 2020. This is not who she was 3 years ago.
It’s a theatre for us profane cattle. Julia had an early role as a lockdown sceptic but she fell in to line and promoted the lethal injections just like 99% of the other puppets on the idiot box d
They all get instructions on what role to play in the current production. I can only assume her role as being against lockdowns was to get people to trust her, relate to what she's said...only to now, hope that that following will still be held under her influence in the current act (Israel/Palentine war). I see the same psy-op with Elon Musk being a "good guy", free speech and all that. They're playing the long game and always have.
I have seen poor interviewers but none have ever been as bad and disrespectful as her. Her other interviews are not munch better - does anyone actually bother to watch her show
I don't watch interviews, as I find most of them incredibly boring. They invariably tiptoe (or tap dance) around the edges of the issue they are pretending to dissect.
JH-B and James Delingpole used to be politically aligned but he called her out mid 2020 as a wrong-un...he’s right