The real question is not being asked…. Focus is on SS missing and leaving this one perfect spot unsecured but the real question is how did some random 20 yr old know about that perfect spot? Was he just lucky? That’s the deep dive question 🤷♀️
Max Malone on bitchute argues the shooter is not dead because everything is staged. But that horrible picture of the shooter dead, with very dry blood all over his face, shot from behind, looks very real.
Blackrock... that name rings a bell... I don't know... wasn't that a Correspondence Teaching Company that sold courses to teach people how win friends and influence people? They did a terrible job with that kid.
In my opinion, we will likely never know for sure if this photo is legit evidence of a dead (patsy) 'shooter.' They have moulage and rubber dummies that are very advanced, and they have staged who knows how many deaths and scenario from time immemorial.
They clearly want us to think that here's a dead shooter, however. This much we know.
I’m not sure. Some people are saying it’s a different person than what they are telling us. That bloody face did look more like the Antifa guy and the hair color was exactly the same color as the Antifa guy
Western finance needs WW-3 emergency-powers to stay in power when their Ponzi scheme, not supported by Russian assets (FAIL) or now by even $10 trillion in Ukrainian mineral wealth assets (FAIL-in-progress) crashes, and all the marks discover they are "unsecured creditors" at their banks, retirement accounts, and not really "owners" of stocks or bonds, either.
Given the Ear Holes for jewelry and odd shapes ear lobes, there is a fast way to see if this is the right guy. Guessing tattoos also will identify the kid who is said to do it and the potential real culprit but the FBI is investigating so anything is possible. I think this is why they wanted Alex Jones out of the way. Hey day for conspiracies.
Nice to hear from you. We met at a Guy McPherson talk in Austin around 2009 or so.
I built a house in Yoakum, which I designed, general-contracted, and did most of the building-in on after I got fired for vaccine-refusal in October 2021.
The only evidence I have is the lack of destruction to the front of his face. There are pictures/videos available of him climbing, crawling and dead. The dead picture shows no evidence of trauma yo the front of his face, if that in fact is the shooter and it's not an edited photo.
That then raises a new question: If the Cabal is powerful, why not just manufacture a phony social media presence that fosters a narrative they want the public to believe? That would be far more useful to them than the oddity of a 20-year-old with virtually no social media presence at all.
The usual MO is not to manufacture one narrative - what they do is manufacture half a dozen different contradictory narratives. For example they might establish the main narrative of a lone nutcase assassin, but provide counter narratives for a second shooter, an inside job, etc.
That's not a difficult shot to take without a scope. He also missed Trump with the other shots because he was firing in rapid succession. He was shooting at Trump with a crowd as his backdrop. The first thing I thought when the shooting was first announced was that if no one else was hit, it was likely staged, then I found out that three others had been hit.
"random" 20yo with some sort of improvised explosives in vehicle, according to WSJ and other sources. Nothing says "I've made a new retired friend on the internet" like driving around with homebrew explosives you don't have any obvious plan for.
None of it feels organic. Nothing about it feels real. I’m not making any claims - I don’t know know what to make of it except that mass trauma followed by mass gaslighting has become a pattern and seems like an op. The whole notion of this kind of assassination feels strange and antiquated to me. As though they can’t just use one of their millions of ways of eliminating people to get rid of him…there needs to be a spectacle to hijack everybody’s attention.
Embarrasing? Do things seem to be getting more normal and less chaotic to you?
I see prophesy being fulfilled on a regular basis and under the circumstances I'd say it's warranted. If "they" are moving to their 2030 goals, things are not going to settle down. Feel free to stick with whatever you like!
I offered a statement of things as they are, and knowing rhe future plans suggested it's a distraction due to all of the nonsense being offered, like fake virus', fake wars, "assassinations" sorry that bothers you. I knoe they want a full digital currency. Is it promoting atmosphere to speculate a financial collapse?
Well done. " mass trauma followed by mass gaslighting has become a pattern " It's so tiresome. And it never ends. Today there will be another event. Tomorrow, another. America is over, and not because of "us." It's because the hidden-hand demons who print the money and make the "rules," have decided she should exist no more. And apparently, as part of the plan, they have decreed that the Chinese should take her over. That's what I see from my vantage point in San Diego.
God, speaking through his prophets, calls Trump his "David." He repeatedly encourages his followers to trust in Him. He names the names of our enemies and says He will take them down. Heads of state. Heads of departments. He's been fairly specific, and uses the vernacular. Who do you think turned Trump's head at exactly the critical moment? Be still and know...
As x-22 Dave never tires of pointing out, you can't just tell people their government is corrupt. You have to show them. That's what "biden presidency" has been. A show. And it's almost curtains time...
Until now nothing I’ve seen so far can’t be explained by just incompetence. They don’t take protecting Trump seriously so DEI and shotty work EXCEPT the woman in the black hat - her lack of reaction and pulling camera out was trippy.
Right now, I'm trying to find a video where we can hear the alleged 8 to 10 shots coming from the kid shooter. From what I can tell, the alleged kid shooter had a direct line of sight, perpendicular to the stage. This can be deduced from this video, https://www.bitchute.com/video/AVkZbQMrZ5iK/ where we can see Trump; we can see the SS snipers on the roof; and, we can see the direction of where the SS sniper on the left is supposedly shooting to kill the kid shooter. This video proves that the kid shooter could not have shot Trump's right ear, because Trump's right ear cannot be seen by the kid shooter.
So, who shot Trump's right ear? Or, did Trump's ear not get shot?
In the following video: https://x.com/yashar/status/1812250271428538706 I can hear four more shots that come AFTER the three shots by the SS sniper on the roof; and, those four additional shots sound like they come from the SS sniper's rifle. So, was the SS sniper firing four more shots at the kid shooter?
Again...Right now, I'm trying to find a video where we can hear the alleged 8 to 10 shots coming from the kid shooter. Do you know of such a video?
Here's another post where I explained my problem with this incident:
The shots which were being fired when Trump grabbed his ear were all shots fired by a Secret Service sniper. There is a video of this sniper and Trump in the same field of view and you can see and hear the sniper fire the first shot and Trump grab his right ear. Trump's right ear is toward the back of the stage, so the kid shooter could not see it at that point and could not have shot it. Watch the first video I have posted immediately above and you will see what I mean. I can hear no other shots being fired other than those coming from the Secret Service sniper. Do you hear any other shots being fired? In my second video linked above you will hear at least four more shots being fired, but they sound like they're also from the SS sniper's rifle. Plus, the kid shooter couldn't have fired them, because he had already been hit by the SS sniper. -- I think people are just wildly assuming that Trump was shot by the kid shooter; but they are sorely mistaken.
Thank you, sir. We are settling for quick answers and are not skeptical enough. It may well be that the kid and the deceased family man are victims of something far more sinister, something engineered by the Feds or the amorphous blob running and ruining our country…let us pray for, and not forget, the young man’s parents in Bethel Park. What the press is reporting as “cooperating with authorities” may be a euphemism for “threatened with injury and bankruptcy.” Nothing is too evil these days.
Excellent analysis. I too only hear the the shots from the SS sniper in the videos I have watched. And when those shots are fired, that is when Trump touches his ear, which is facing away from the alleged Crooks sniper. Very strange indeed.
See my two comments I made just now under the Cullen YT video. His diagrams agree with my analysis of where the kid shooter was stationed. But Cullen had obviously not seen the video at https://www.bitchute.com/video/AVkZbQMrZ5iK/ , which provides a much better perspective of what occurred. And, I'm still not convinced that the supposed photo of the bullet whizzing by Trump's head is not an AI concoction to make us believe that Trump was indeed shot. - I'm going to need to see a chunk of flesh missing from Trump's right ear before I'll believe that photo is real.
Looking at the first video you linked to, I am not sure the shots came from the sniper on the roof that was being highlighted by the analyzer, and it raises a lot of questions for me, but I do believe that it is more likely that Trump was shot by the kid on the roof and it wasn't faked. We also have to remember we are watching video that has also been uploaded to social media. We don't know what device recorded it, how it processed the video and audio files, and how the platform that received the original file processed it. There can be significant differences in how our eyes and ears process that information and how a cell phone or video camera processes it. Modern cameras and cell phones attempt to filter out background noises. If you have ever been around gunfire, you will recognize that it is usually slightly delayed, especially when there are buildings for it to echo off of.
I have been around a lot of precision shooting and am very familiar with sniper rifles and how sniper teams operate. If the three shots that are heard came from the SS sniper he's the worst sniper in the world. Before the first shot is heard he brings his head up and away from the scope. This could have been done after he took his first shot to see if he hit his target, which is a no-no, but it doesn't match up to the rifle report..again, this could be due to audio processing. He then very quickly brings it back down to get behind it again, then you hear a report. When the shot goes off, it looks like the sniper has flinched as if he was startled, raising the barrel, which would have been a miss (although we are dealing with audio from a video recording so we don't know what the delay time is. He could have taken a shot, got back behind the gun to see if he had hit his target, then raised the barrel to get off target, and then we hear a delayed gunshot.)That doesn't usually happen when a trained sniper takes a shot. The barrels on their rifles don't rise like that from a single shot. They just jump slightly. He would have stayed on the scope to make sure the shooter was down to take a follow up shot if necessary. He wouldn't have take his gun off of him. Also, it is more likely than not that the sniper with the gun on the tripod has a bolt operated gun, which shoots one time, then he has to pull the bolt to the rear, eject a spent casing, then push it forward to insert another cartridge into the breech. There is no such action when the other two shots are heard. Besides, even if he shot another two rounds, they would have been unintentional discharges because the gun isn't aimed anywhere near the target. That is highly unlikely. It is possible that the sniper next to him on the smaller caliber semi-auto gun may have taken the shots, but his actions are strange also. Watch how he reacts to the gunshots. He thinks he's being shot at, gets off of his gun, and moves down the roof to hide. This would not have happened if the sniper next to him had fired the three shots or if he had taken the shots.
The rifle which we hear in that video is being fired on semi-auto...it is not a bolt action. I can't prove absolutely that those three shots are coming from the rifle of the forward SS sniper on the white roof, but I believe I can state that those shots could not have come from the Kid shooter who was 400 feet away. If they had been from the kid shooter, their sound would have been greatly attenuated. Plus, that kid shooter could not have nicked Trump's right hear, because Trump's head was turned to the right and his right ear was toward the back of the stage. The kid shooter could not see that ear... he could see only the left ear. There could have been another, albeit concealed shooter who could have shot at Trump, but that concealed shooter would have had to have been near the white-roofed building that the 2 SS snipers are on.
Trump moves his head too fast for us to know for sure the kid could not have shot it (by accident, as it's reasonable to suppose he wasn't aiming for the ear anyway).
Someone watching Seth Holehouse's podcast just asked the question, "Why did the mainstream media finally decide to be at Trump's rally, when they just haven't been doing that?" And, Seth is saying, "Yes, what if the mainstream media had notice that Trump was going to be assassinated and they could put it on live TV?"
Plus, other than hearsay, we really have no concrete evidence that the kid shooter actually got any shots off at Trump. There could have been someone else shooting at Trump; OR, it's possible no one shot at Trump. (-:
The guy in the video below says it makes sense that it would be a head shot, because, speakers at events such as this normally wear body armor. My response to that is that armor piercing bullets will easily go through body armor.
I agree that it's a semi-auto rifle being fired, which is why it doesn't seem likely that the shots that are heard are coming from the snipers on the roof. Both of their reactions are as if they were startled by the gunfire. The primary sniper generally deploys with a bolt-action .308, especially if he has a spotter who has also deployed with a rifle. A secondary sniper acting as a spotter may also deploy with a smaller caliber rifle, like a 5.56 with a holographic sight that is either not magnified or variable. This is because when using a high powered scope the field of view is too limited and doesn't allow for quick target acquisition at close range. I stand by my statement that you cannot determine where the shots came from based upon what is likely cell phone video that has been uploaded to social media. There are too many variables in processing. As far as whether or not the kid could see Trump's right ear, the analysis from many others says that he turned his head which allowed it. I haven't done enough research to comment on that.
Looks to me like the 2 SS snipers on the roof are using the same rifle but a slightly different scope. They also have binoculars laying on the roof beside them.
At https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UKHqxPNNxfA , time - 5:44, the narrator says that it looks like the SS snipers are using a special version of the bolt action Remington 700 with a suppressor, firing a Winchester 300 Magnum round. If that is true, then I have no idea what happened. because the 2nd and 3rd shots I hear in the videos above seem to be too close together to have been fired from a bolt action. - I'll wait to see if Trump shows is he's missing a chunk of his ear. If he doesn't do that, I'm not admitting that this was an assassination attempt.
Thanks for the clearer photos. Well we know one thing. They have beards so they are definitely Tier 1 badasses! (inside joke) It doesn't really matter what kind of gun it is. All that matters is that they are bolt action rifles and that snipers take a shot, pull the bolt to the rear to eject the spent casing, then run the bolt forward to load another cartridge in preparation to take a follow up shot if necessary, all while staying behind the scope and on target. I don't see the SS sniper doing any of that. It is possible that there was a simultaneous shot from both snipers, but as you can see in the video neither one of them stays behind their scope like they should have after the shot was taken and cycles their bolts. The Bitchute video analysis guy you posted doesn't know his ass from a hole in the ground when he claims the SS sniper fired the three shots on the video he is analyzing. Unless he had two negligent discharges following the first shot, which is impossible on a bolt action rifle. I'm still confused by the actions of the sniper in the foreground, though. It looks like he was startled and pulled his shot high based on the audio. If he took a shot that the camera didn't catch the audio of, he came off his scope, then went back to it for a brief second before raising his barrel in the air quickly and then lowered it. All I can think of is that he took a shot that wasn't captured by the microphone on the device making the video (suppressed high caliber rifles are quiet, but not movie silencer quiet, and we don't know how far away the video was taken from, etc.) and what was mistaken as muzzle rise at the time a shot is heard is the shooter raising his barrel to make the area safe for officers responding to the roof where the dead guy is laying. He then lowered his muzzle so it was pointed in a safe direction. But based on my knowledge he should have stayed on gun until responding officers confirmed the other shooter was dead. He also would have pulled the bolt to the rear to make the gun safe if he wasn't going to be back on gun. Plus, who fired the three shots if the SS sniper had killed the other shooter with the first shot? Something isn't adding up.
Thanks for posting this video. Look who was seated behind Trump when the ear shot happened. Black hat. Dark jacket, light shirt. Looks like Vincent Fusca to me. Standing there, big as life, when everyone else is hitting the deck...
In all the videos I first saw (including from the Wall Street Journal), you can clearly hear at least 7-8 shots. A friend suspected they might be taken down, or at least the audio removed. Maybe that happened?
If you view and listen to the 2nd video I posted above, where only Trump is in the field of view, you can hear the initial three shots followed by four or five more. To my ears, they are all from the same gun and that has to be the SS snipers rifle or a different rifle near that building. If any of those shots had been from the kid sniper who was 400 feet away, the sound of his shots would have been greatly attenuated.
What's bizarre to me are the theories that the ear graze was intentional. Uh no...that would be one hell of a Risk to take since an inch difference leads to a very different result.
There's no way a sniper could 'stage' shooting an ear - there are too many risks. It's either a head / body shot accompanied by an act of God, or staged with fake blood. If we go down the staged route, there is a lot of unsavory collateral.
Now that we have had at least 36 hours to process, we can see that there was an absolute failure on the part of the multiple law enforcement officers involved in the protection detail of former president Trump.
Having been in the military, law enforcement , and an elected official, the gaps in security were very severe.
The big question we need to know is if there were others involved in this assassination attempt, and who.
Will the lazy FBI actually look into others involved, and who will be prosecuted?
In my mind, there is no way a 20, non-military trained kid can actually pull off this type of action. The logistics of it are more than he could comprehend, and who taught him to make explosives anyway?
Why was his van loaded with bombs?
How did he know that, that building was within line of sight?
Who put the ladder there, and when?
Who paid for the materials to make the bombs?
So many other questions that need answers, but we need some one to investigate, and come up with them, then that info has to be declassified for the puplics use.
Do not seeing this happening, already they are getting ready to close the investigation, as has been stated in the media.
I am real tired of all the childish conspiracy theories that say the assassination of President Trump, though failed through Providence, was an orchestrated plan by Trump & his "Secret Society of White Hats," staged to somehow teach Americans a lesson or other. My word! Get a real life. LOL!!!!
Our eyes did not deceive us in real time as we watched it all go down. Including the live, non-state interviews, after the fact, of all the direct witnesses involved at the scene, long before the Shadow Government had the chance to cleanse all their stories and censor all their independent videos.
Anyone that says it was "staged" has never yet produced any material evidence to support their asinine assertions & infantile opinions. Thus:
It is clear President Trump is NOT in control behind the scenes. (Never was. LOL!)
It is clear the Luciferian Cabal is.
If we can name any specific Deep State Player, they are not in control. (However, rethink in terms of the Gettys.)
President Donald J. Trump did NOT plan to whack his own self, fomenting another bloody Civil War. And, he could not have, not in a million years, dodged that bullet so miraculously. Not even with a Trillion chances.
Just because the Shadow Government of young players are manipulating Biden & the Deep, Administrative State behind the scenes doesn't at all mean it is "staged." (Whatever that means.) - Former Chan Q-Decoder; now undeceived.
This poster admits he was once a follower of 'Q'. Enough said. That's some REALLY low level discernment, lol.
If one simply knows basic cryptography and how occultists work, and what Q 'means'......one would never believe Q from jump street.
Low discernment level.
Trump is 100% a part of their gang. And a major player in their upcoming plans. If they truly wanted Trump dead would they allow some milquetoasty looking creature with limited shooting skills onto a rooftop only to fail.....retarded. There's a million ways they could take him, or anyone out. People are so blind.
'Politics' - is emotional professional wrestling. This entire thing was the WWE.
At one point I fell for Q, and I wouldn't call my discernment low. Anyone can fall for traps, what matters is what you do when you find out it's a trap.
At this point, anybody who refused the jabs and held out despite the carrots and sticks can pat themselves on the back and consider their discernment excellent.
Q made people feel special with inside information. I thought it sounded too much like a trend a few years earlier when everyone was going to get all their tax money back, or something like that.
Operation Trust (or hope?) based on Bolshevik propaganda, it kept everyone in limbo, no one took action.
You nailed it Rosalind. Exactly. It keeps everyone passive with 'white hats are taking care of it all behind the scenes nonsense.'
Long before "Q" - there were MANY other psyop people and movements which had the exact same story line as "Q". One such person was a man named 'Drake'. A goofy 'insider' guy who espoused the exact same nonsense as Q. Zero difference. This was back in 2011/2012. There were others as well. Always with the same story, even using the same verbiage - white hats arresting baddies behind the scenes but the plebs cannot handle the truth so you will still see them in power.
People fall for it every time. It is similar to the innumerable New Agers/Soiritual types I used to know who considered themselves 'higher consciousness' and 'high vibration', who then all took the jabs and fell for all the propaganda. There's no higher consciousness, and there's no coming back from that, ever. Those people can never again claim to be higher consciousness than the rest of humanity who are pretending to be asleep. I used to know many many people of this ilk, as that was who populated Portland, Oregon. The vast majority of them need to retire now as life coaches, as they should not be wielding influence towards others. Most, still do not even know there's an organized, syndicated crime syndicate wit a very pernicious intention in this world, but they are coaching others.
That's obvious. Trump is a man of steel. The bullet bounced off his skull, hitting the ear on the rebound. Underneath that mundane suit, he wears a Superman costume.
I posted Trump events on FB; taken down by FB - I contested, FB put back up
I posted dem's calls - incl Biden’s - for Trumps assassination (clearly inciting violence, acts against community standards one would think) were not fact checked or taken down by FB
This is what it showed. A 40-something woman with long dark hair and sunglasses was close to the front of the crowd near Trump, vaguely seemed to be waiting for something. When shots rang out and people started screaming, she briefly ducked, perhaps to grab her phone, then immediately started filming. Whole thing was done expressionlessly, cool as a cucumber, unaffected by the turmoil around her and not trying to protect herself in the immediate aftermath. It was extremely unusual and concerning.
Biden’s use of “inappropriate” brings to mind Obama’s declaring that the deaths of Ambassador Stevens and his security team in Benghazi was “suboptimal”. Kind of makes ya wonder who’s writing Joe’s talking points.
Thanks for your post - additional information, well formulated and the only voice suggesting the inside job's plausible source (including the most pertinent information, well structured intro precedes this) :
So, here’s a theory which could line up with current events…
The timing of the event is suspicious. If the assassination had been successful, the Republicans would have had to choose another candidate at the Republican National Convention, happening about now. Given that it took place after the crucial debates which sealed Bidens fate, this makes me wonder if it was a coup attempt by a Republican conspiracy.
Consider that only two other candidates on ‘his side’ have delegates: Ron DeSantis, and Nikki Haley. While Haley is a neocon and DeSantis is undecided, both align in the three crucial sectors; they support the Israel lobby, they support the intelligence agencies current leadership, and they back wars in the Middle East and Europe. Trump does not.
Note also that some time ago, Vivek Ramaswamy went on record saying that the only reason Nikki Haley had not dropped out - despite having zero populist support - was because her donors were “plotting to eliminate Trump from the ballet”.
To address the three major institutions - the intelligence agencies, Israel lobby, and military contractors - one must look at Trumps rhetoric. This explains why his own party would be motivated to take him out. I will draw comparisons with the most obvious individual - JFK.
The first issue is the Israel lobby. Thus far Trump’s biggest donors have been Zionists and Silicon Valley technocrats. The Zionists - most notably the mega wealthy Miriam Adelson - do not appear to be supporting Trump. There is strong incentive for a conservative leadership to provide military aid to Israel. Why? Firstly, Netanyahu needs war to stay in office, and when he eventually steps down (which will happen once the conflict ends) he would likely be indicted on various corruption charges and probably end up in prison. Secondly - or rather on a deeper level - Netanyahu could be seen as a pawn. Those holding power - like his finance minister and others unnamed - also desire war; under the justification of ‘national security’ they seek to destroy Israel’s regional rivals (Lebanon, Iran) and expand their borders to create ‘Greater Israel’.
Thus, it came as a surprise to many that Trump - despite receiving over $100 million from Zionist donors - never bowed down in worship towards Israel. Both DeSantis and Haley have, in fact they speak of Israel as they would speak of God. What’s more, Trump also went on record not too long ago, claiming that Netanyahu received ‘justified criticism’ for the 7/10 attack last year. This suggests that Trump has not yet yielded to his donors completely. This makes him a threat to Israel lobby, as he may be unwilling to finance another major middle eastern war. For the Zionist leadership, maybe is not a good enough guarantee when it comes to military aid; without America Israel’s military grinds to a halt.
Likewise, Kennedy angered these groups, since he advocated for three things; Palestinian right-of-return to Israel, a shut down on the Israeli nuclear weapons program, and the registration of AIPAC as a foreign agent (through FARA). In my view it seems that this was the final straw which landed him in a coffin.
The second major player is the intelligence community, or more specifically the Silicon Valley technocrats who have evidently taken over the security apparatus. Key figures here (who are relevant to the Trump administration) are Peter Thiel (who rose to prominence thanks to funding from neocon Irving Kristol), and his proteges JD Vance, Curtis Yarvin, and so forth. This movement seeks to - as Thiel once put it - create a ‘techno monarchy’ in America. Many within the right-leaning Silicon Valley scene appear to be neoconservatives, who advocate for mass surveillance, invasive technologies, and so forth. Thiel even said that the CIA is a front for Palantir - his infamous digital security firm. And, they appear to have no issue with the Israel lobby or the military industrial complex.
Likewise, Kennedy promised to splinter the CIA into a thousand pieces, reigning in their black projects which were becoming increasingly detached from any sense of national security. They too went after him because of this.
Which brings me to the last important group of players, the military contractors. These are arguably the most financially powerful, although not the most influential on this list. It seems obvious that out of all the republican candidates, Trump is the only (perhaps save Vivek, who was quickly removed) to stand against expanded geopolitical hostility. DeSantis yields to his donors, whilst Haley literally worked as a defence contractor, and now desires to send American troops to Israel and Ukraine. Trump - in contrast - has made it obvious that peace in the Middle East is of top priority. He has also suggested that the Ukraine war will be ended before he is even officially inaugurated. Putin has said he is onboard with this. The outcome will be obvious; Ukraine will be integrated with Russia in some way, essentially becoming a rump state. Everyone in the neocon sphere fumes at the thought of this; NATO, the RNC, and of course the contractors. Note that the contractors are not only sending existing surplus weapons to Ukraine (as we are often told), but they are also actively replenishing supplies. They aren’t doing this for free, and what they charge is beyond insane.
Likewise, Kennedy sought to end the Cold War. After the failed Great Leap Forward he wanted to normalise relations with China, whilst a thawing Soviet Union meant that peace with the Russians was very possible. This all came crashing down with his assassination. It wasn’t just him who tried this; his brother sought peace, and he also paid with his life. Later, Nixon and Kissinger would also try for peace with China and Russia, only to be conveniently tied up in corruption claims and removed from office, with all their progress reverted by the neocons in the Ford administration.
Thus, with all this in mind, one can see why his ‘own’ people would be willing to sacrifice him. They would benefit financially, socially, and politically through incentives. If Trump had been successfully taken out, then realistically the events which followed would have looked something like this; liberals receive the blowback for the event, Haley or DeSantis are selected to lead, the people rally behind them as they use dialectical rhetoric to stoke anger towards the left while obfuscating from the right, they enter office and proceed to operate as agents of all three major institutions mentioned, and for the next four years ride off of the anger produced during the Trump shooting.
If everything had gone to plan, they would have a Haley or DeSantis presidency, and this cabinet would allow all three interest groups to benefit at the expense of the American people’s tax dollars, or with their lives. It would arguably be worse than another Biden presidency, since I doubt DeSantis or Haley would even bother addressing what would have been the one potential upside - the deportation of illegals and the shutting of the border.
For this reason, with the information currently available, I believe that the Trump shooting could have been an attempted coup. The liberal establishment are still adversaries of the people, but in this case, I think the shots were fired by his own party in a bid to change the direction of the presidency. For the moment at least, it failed, thank God.
These major interest groups are what sway the White House. This is why the Trump administration needs proper staff; true loyalists who stand by America, not by contractors, foreign agencies, and money. This is what Project 2025 is all about, and it is why such a project needs to be adopted by Trump. By what appears to be divine intervention, he lives to see another day and this should be his cue to truly go all-in during this coming presidency; end foreign interference, end bribery from contractors and corporations, and truly attempt to fix America.
After concluding that Trump didn't/couldn't have used a squib and that was a real shot to his ear with real blood, it's tough to conclude that it was anything other than a close call and a true injury. The downplaying was obviously pre-planned. There is weirdness both from what look like operatives in the audience and the DEI-hired women SS officers who were bumbling fools, and way too short to cover Trump. I also wonder why the gunman's entire online social presence was scrubbed before anyone could find anything, and why the SS patently ignored those people screaming about seeing the gunman on the roof. Also, the snipers obviously SAW the guy climbing onto the roof. And that tip any alarms? Nevermind this guy who's supposedly spilling the beans saying he was not given the OK. What were the snipers doing while the guy was climbing up the ladder and getting in place?
He asked for his shoes before they took him out of the stadium. A common response when someone is in the midst of a tragedy or if a person is in shock is to focus on making sure you don't leave your belongings behind. I read a book about the strange things people do in crisis situations. People have been killed after airplane accidents because the evacuation from the airplane was stalled as people were trying to carry their luggage off of the plane with them. He's never been one of them and they've made it very obvious that they rabidly despise him. They don't treat their own that way, even when one of their own isn't playing the game right. Every president that I know of who's awakened to the fact that there is some kind of sinister underbelly at play and said so has had either been assassinated or there has been an attempt to take their life. Don't let the questioning of this incident divide us. They wanted to kill Donald Trump and start a civil war. Fortunately, they didn't succeed. Don't let them finish the job by sowing division because we (rightfully) have questions.
It's amusing to see how many people second-guess human behavior in unique crisis situations as if 1) everyone behaves the same and therefore should behave the same, and 2) they always have to behave in a "logical" way according to the armchair quarterback in question.
Crooks. Isn't the name of the official perpetrator too obvious?
I shudder to think that man was 15-16 when this war started in 2020.
Also, the name Thomas. Like the skeptic apostle. He didn't believe the other apostles when they told him Jesus was alive. He demanded to see the holes in his hands and put his finger on them, and see the wound on his side, and then he would believe.
Does Trump have a hole in his bullet-grazed ear? Was he meant to have one?
A crook is also a hooked staff carried by a shepherd for leading sheep.
"By hook or by crook" means "by any means necessary."
At the beginning of each episode of The Prisoner, Number 2 tells Number , "Information. We want information." Number Six shouts back "You won't get it!! And then Number 2 laughs, "By hook or by crook, we will!" I guess this is as well known to people of a certain age in the UK as "To boldly go where no man has gone before" or "This tape will self destruct in ten seconds" is in the US.
No (so-called) “hurt feelings”, Some Dude, but thanks 🙏 for your faux concern. Seems a tad like virtue signaling to me, but what do I know about only having my own specific and individual point-of-view/perspective.
The real question is not being asked…. Focus is on SS missing and leaving this one perfect spot unsecured but the real question is how did some random 20 yr old know about that perfect spot? Was he just lucky? That’s the deep dive question 🤷♀️
Max Malone on bitchute argues the shooter is not dead because everything is staged. But that horrible picture of the shooter dead, with very dry blood all over his face, shot from behind, looks very real.
The shooter starred in a Blackrock commercial just a few years ago- have you seen that clip?
Blackrock... that name rings a bell... I don't know... wasn't that a Correspondence Teaching Company that sold courses to teach people how win friends and influence people? They did a terrible job with that kid.
The hair color is completely different from a photo of the alleged shooter
Can light explain the difference in color?
Also, the shape of the ear looks similar.
In my opinion, we will likely never know for sure if this photo is legit evidence of a dead (patsy) 'shooter.' They have moulage and rubber dummies that are very advanced, and they have staged who knows how many deaths and scenario from time immemorial.
They clearly want us to think that here's a dead shooter, however. This much we know.
There will be a round 2, see my post below.
I’m not sure. Some people are saying it’s a different person than what they are telling us. That bloody face did look more like the Antifa guy and the hair color was exactly the same color as the Antifa guy
Western finance needs WW-3 emergency-powers to stay in power when their Ponzi scheme, not supported by Russian assets (FAIL) or now by even $10 trillion in Ukrainian mineral wealth assets (FAIL-in-progress) crashes, and all the marks discover they are "unsecured creditors" at their banks, retirement accounts, and not really "owners" of stocks or bonds, either.
Wild speculation, some would say deranged speculation. We are trying to sort out the basics and these types are already on Planet X.
"Shadow Men"
https://montanarcc.substack.com/p/trump-assassination-attempt-forecast
Ever seen a Hollywood movie?
No, never.
Some human male was killed. Was it this guy? https://www.caclubindia.com/assets/maxwell-yearick/
Given the Ear Holes for jewelry and odd shapes ear lobes, there is a fast way to see if this is the right guy. Guessing tattoos also will identify the kid who is said to do it and the potential real culprit but the FBI is investigating so anything is possible. I think this is why they wanted Alex Jones out of the way. Hey day for conspiracies.
Nice to hear from you. We met at a Guy McPherson talk in Austin around 2009 or so.
I built a house in Yoakum, which I designed, general-contracted, and did most of the building-in on after I got fired for vaccine-refusal in October 2021.
See my Substack, if you like, Neighbor.
But the counter sniper shot from the stage area towards patsy shooter. Why would he have been shot in the back of the head?
What evidence do you have that he was shot in the back of the head? Have you seen the autopsy photos?
The only evidence I have is the lack of destruction to the front of his face. There are pictures/videos available of him climbing, crawling and dead. The dead picture shows no evidence of trauma yo the front of his face, if that in fact is the shooter and it's not an edited photo.
Back of head shots can destroy the face as the bullet(s) exit.
I didn't see any evidence of that either. The left back is not visible in picture but little to no damage to the face.
Who took the picture though? I mean - who was up on the roof next to the shooter with a camera / iphone to take that pic?
Who groomed the suicide-assassin (or assassins)?
They obscured their trails at every level, we may assume, but maybe not enough, if there is an actual investigation.
We know they scrubbed his social media before anyone in the public got his name.
That then raises a new question: If the Cabal is powerful, why not just manufacture a phony social media presence that fosters a narrative they want the public to believe? That would be far more useful to them than the oddity of a 20-year-old with virtually no social media presence at all.
The usual MO is not to manufacture one narrative - what they do is manufacture half a dozen different contradictory narratives. For example they might establish the main narrative of a lone nutcase assassin, but provide counter narratives for a second shooter, an inside job, etc.
Color me confused.
Yeah he didn't even have a scope. In 4 shots he killed 1 and hit Trump. Very tough to buy.
That's not a difficult shot to take without a scope. He also missed Trump with the other shots because he was firing in rapid succession. He was shooting at Trump with a crowd as his backdrop. The first thing I thought when the shooting was first announced was that if no one else was hit, it was likely staged, then I found out that three others had been hit.
"random" 20yo with some sort of improvised explosives in vehicle, according to WSJ and other sources. Nothing says "I've made a new retired friend on the internet" like driving around with homebrew explosives you don't have any obvious plan for.
None of it feels organic. Nothing about it feels real. I’m not making any claims - I don’t know know what to make of it except that mass trauma followed by mass gaslighting has become a pattern and seems like an op. The whole notion of this kind of assassination feels strange and antiquated to me. As though they can’t just use one of their millions of ways of eliminating people to get rid of him…there needs to be a spectacle to hijack everybody’s attention.
Well put. The spectacle part of these ops seems to be the crucial element.
There are very real DISTRACTIONS right now. I believe we're going to see something very big, and by big I mean bad.
Absolutely.
Embarrasing? Do things seem to be getting more normal and less chaotic to you?
I see prophesy being fulfilled on a regular basis and under the circumstances I'd say it's warranted. If "they" are moving to their 2030 goals, things are not going to settle down. Feel free to stick with whatever you like!
I offered a statement of things as they are, and knowing rhe future plans suggested it's a distraction due to all of the nonsense being offered, like fake virus', fake wars, "assassinations" sorry that bothers you. I knoe they want a full digital currency. Is it promoting atmosphere to speculate a financial collapse?
You're as free as they allow you to be!
Well done. " mass trauma followed by mass gaslighting has become a pattern " It's so tiresome. And it never ends. Today there will be another event. Tomorrow, another. America is over, and not because of "us." It's because the hidden-hand demons who print the money and make the "rules," have decided she should exist no more. And apparently, as part of the plan, they have decreed that the Chinese should take her over. That's what I see from my vantage point in San Diego.
Exactly, they are waiting in the wings, waiting for their orders to descend like a plague of locusts.
Average Americans can't believe how close they are to being turned over to another entity.
33 million illegals, more than half military age men.
Any idea when they will swoop down? It feels like sept/oct
It's just astounding how many Chinese and Hindus are in San Diego right now. San Diego has become western Canada overnight.
God, speaking through his prophets, calls Trump his "David." He repeatedly encourages his followers to trust in Him. He names the names of our enemies and says He will take them down. Heads of state. Heads of departments. He's been fairly specific, and uses the vernacular. Who do you think turned Trump's head at exactly the critical moment? Be still and know...
Why didn’t do it in his first term then? Give me a break. His cabinet was as full of neocons as Bush the Second’s.
As x-22 Dave never tires of pointing out, you can't just tell people their government is corrupt. You have to show them. That's what "biden presidency" has been. A show. And it's almost curtains time...
You don’t think the Trump presidency was a show? Come on. We are all being played.
I want to know how Entheos does it. Jsnip4 relates three and four and five year deltas that are dead on. How?
You'll have to ask Him.
Until now nothing I’ve seen so far can’t be explained by just incompetence. They don’t take protecting Trump seriously so DEI and shotty work EXCEPT the woman in the black hat - her lack of reaction and pulling camera out was trippy.
Check this out: https://www.brasscheck.com/video/second-gunmen-and-patsies/
Celia,
Right now, I'm trying to find a video where we can hear the alleged 8 to 10 shots coming from the kid shooter. From what I can tell, the alleged kid shooter had a direct line of sight, perpendicular to the stage. This can be deduced from this video, https://www.bitchute.com/video/AVkZbQMrZ5iK/ where we can see Trump; we can see the SS snipers on the roof; and, we can see the direction of where the SS sniper on the left is supposedly shooting to kill the kid shooter. This video proves that the kid shooter could not have shot Trump's right ear, because Trump's right ear cannot be seen by the kid shooter.
So, who shot Trump's right ear? Or, did Trump's ear not get shot?
In the following video: https://x.com/yashar/status/1812250271428538706 I can hear four more shots that come AFTER the three shots by the SS sniper on the roof; and, those four additional shots sound like they come from the SS sniper's rifle. So, was the SS sniper firing four more shots at the kid shooter?
Again...Right now, I'm trying to find a video where we can hear the alleged 8 to 10 shots coming from the kid shooter. Do you know of such a video?
Here's another post where I explained my problem with this incident:
The shots which were being fired when Trump grabbed his ear were all shots fired by a Secret Service sniper. There is a video of this sniper and Trump in the same field of view and you can see and hear the sniper fire the first shot and Trump grab his right ear. Trump's right ear is toward the back of the stage, so the kid shooter could not see it at that point and could not have shot it. Watch the first video I have posted immediately above and you will see what I mean. I can hear no other shots being fired other than those coming from the Secret Service sniper. Do you hear any other shots being fired? In my second video linked above you will hear at least four more shots being fired, but they sound like they're also from the SS sniper's rifle. Plus, the kid shooter couldn't have fired them, because he had already been hit by the SS sniper. -- I think people are just wildly assuming that Trump was shot by the kid shooter; but they are sorely mistaken.
Thank you, sir. We are settling for quick answers and are not skeptical enough. It may well be that the kid and the deceased family man are victims of something far more sinister, something engineered by the Feds or the amorphous blob running and ruining our country…let us pray for, and not forget, the young man’s parents in Bethel Park. What the press is reporting as “cooperating with authorities” may be a euphemism for “threatened with injury and bankruptcy.” Nothing is too evil these days.
Excellent analysis. I too only hear the the shots from the SS sniper in the videos I have watched. And when those shots are fired, that is when Trump touches his ear, which is facing away from the alleged Crooks sniper. Very strange indeed.
Exactly. And, yes...very strange indeed.
On YouTube, John Cullen, breaks it down with step by step frame by frame evidence. I wasn’t giving it much energy until I saw his video.
See my two comments I made just now under the Cullen YT video. His diagrams agree with my analysis of where the kid shooter was stationed. But Cullen had obviously not seen the video at https://www.bitchute.com/video/AVkZbQMrZ5iK/ , which provides a much better perspective of what occurred. And, I'm still not convinced that the supposed photo of the bullet whizzing by Trump's head is not an AI concoction to make us believe that Trump was indeed shot. - I'm going to need to see a chunk of flesh missing from Trump's right ear before I'll believe that photo is real.
Looking at the first video you linked to, I am not sure the shots came from the sniper on the roof that was being highlighted by the analyzer, and it raises a lot of questions for me, but I do believe that it is more likely that Trump was shot by the kid on the roof and it wasn't faked. We also have to remember we are watching video that has also been uploaded to social media. We don't know what device recorded it, how it processed the video and audio files, and how the platform that received the original file processed it. There can be significant differences in how our eyes and ears process that information and how a cell phone or video camera processes it. Modern cameras and cell phones attempt to filter out background noises. If you have ever been around gunfire, you will recognize that it is usually slightly delayed, especially when there are buildings for it to echo off of.
I have been around a lot of precision shooting and am very familiar with sniper rifles and how sniper teams operate. If the three shots that are heard came from the SS sniper he's the worst sniper in the world. Before the first shot is heard he brings his head up and away from the scope. This could have been done after he took his first shot to see if he hit his target, which is a no-no, but it doesn't match up to the rifle report..again, this could be due to audio processing. He then very quickly brings it back down to get behind it again, then you hear a report. When the shot goes off, it looks like the sniper has flinched as if he was startled, raising the barrel, which would have been a miss (although we are dealing with audio from a video recording so we don't know what the delay time is. He could have taken a shot, got back behind the gun to see if he had hit his target, then raised the barrel to get off target, and then we hear a delayed gunshot.)That doesn't usually happen when a trained sniper takes a shot. The barrels on their rifles don't rise like that from a single shot. They just jump slightly. He would have stayed on the scope to make sure the shooter was down to take a follow up shot if necessary. He wouldn't have take his gun off of him. Also, it is more likely than not that the sniper with the gun on the tripod has a bolt operated gun, which shoots one time, then he has to pull the bolt to the rear, eject a spent casing, then push it forward to insert another cartridge into the breech. There is no such action when the other two shots are heard. Besides, even if he shot another two rounds, they would have been unintentional discharges because the gun isn't aimed anywhere near the target. That is highly unlikely. It is possible that the sniper next to him on the smaller caliber semi-auto gun may have taken the shots, but his actions are strange also. Watch how he reacts to the gunshots. He thinks he's being shot at, gets off of his gun, and moves down the roof to hide. This would not have happened if the sniper next to him had fired the three shots or if he had taken the shots.
The rifle which we hear in that video is being fired on semi-auto...it is not a bolt action. I can't prove absolutely that those three shots are coming from the rifle of the forward SS sniper on the white roof, but I believe I can state that those shots could not have come from the Kid shooter who was 400 feet away. If they had been from the kid shooter, their sound would have been greatly attenuated. Plus, that kid shooter could not have nicked Trump's right hear, because Trump's head was turned to the right and his right ear was toward the back of the stage. The kid shooter could not see that ear... he could see only the left ear. There could have been another, albeit concealed shooter who could have shot at Trump, but that concealed shooter would have had to have been near the white-roofed building that the 2 SS snipers are on.
Trump moves his head too fast for us to know for sure the kid could not have shot it (by accident, as it's reasonable to suppose he wasn't aiming for the ear anyway).
Someone watching Seth Holehouse's podcast just asked the question, "Why did the mainstream media finally decide to be at Trump's rally, when they just haven't been doing that?" And, Seth is saying, "Yes, what if the mainstream media had notice that Trump was going to be assassinated and they could put it on live TV?"
Plus, other than hearsay, we really have no concrete evidence that the kid shooter actually got any shots off at Trump. There could have been someone else shooting at Trump; OR, it's possible no one shot at Trump. (-:
The guy in the video below says it makes sense that it would be a head shot, because, speakers at events such as this normally wear body armor. My response to that is that armor piercing bullets will easily go through body armor.
I agree that it's a semi-auto rifle being fired, which is why it doesn't seem likely that the shots that are heard are coming from the snipers on the roof. Both of their reactions are as if they were startled by the gunfire. The primary sniper generally deploys with a bolt-action .308, especially if he has a spotter who has also deployed with a rifle. A secondary sniper acting as a spotter may also deploy with a smaller caliber rifle, like a 5.56 with a holographic sight that is either not magnified or variable. This is because when using a high powered scope the field of view is too limited and doesn't allow for quick target acquisition at close range. I stand by my statement that you cannot determine where the shots came from based upon what is likely cell phone video that has been uploaded to social media. There are too many variables in processing. As far as whether or not the kid could see Trump's right ear, the analysis from many others says that he turned his head which allowed it. I haven't done enough research to comment on that.
https://a57.foxnews.com/static.foxnews.com/foxnews.com/content/uploads/2024/07/1200/675/Donald-Trump-Butler-PA-Shooting-Day-2_39.jpg?ve=1&tl=1
Looks to me like the 2 SS snipers on the roof are using the same rifle but a slightly different scope. They also have binoculars laying on the roof beside them.
At https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UKHqxPNNxfA , time - 5:44, the narrator says that it looks like the SS snipers are using a special version of the bolt action Remington 700 with a suppressor, firing a Winchester 300 Magnum round. If that is true, then I have no idea what happened. because the 2nd and 3rd shots I hear in the videos above seem to be too close together to have been fired from a bolt action. - I'll wait to see if Trump shows is he's missing a chunk of his ear. If he doesn't do that, I'm not admitting that this was an assassination attempt.
Thanks for the clearer photos. Well we know one thing. They have beards so they are definitely Tier 1 badasses! (inside joke) It doesn't really matter what kind of gun it is. All that matters is that they are bolt action rifles and that snipers take a shot, pull the bolt to the rear to eject the spent casing, then run the bolt forward to load another cartridge in preparation to take a follow up shot if necessary, all while staying behind the scope and on target. I don't see the SS sniper doing any of that. It is possible that there was a simultaneous shot from both snipers, but as you can see in the video neither one of them stays behind their scope like they should have after the shot was taken and cycles their bolts. The Bitchute video analysis guy you posted doesn't know his ass from a hole in the ground when he claims the SS sniper fired the three shots on the video he is analyzing. Unless he had two negligent discharges following the first shot, which is impossible on a bolt action rifle. I'm still confused by the actions of the sniper in the foreground, though. It looks like he was startled and pulled his shot high based on the audio. If he took a shot that the camera didn't catch the audio of, he came off his scope, then went back to it for a brief second before raising his barrel in the air quickly and then lowered it. All I can think of is that he took a shot that wasn't captured by the microphone on the device making the video (suppressed high caliber rifles are quiet, but not movie silencer quiet, and we don't know how far away the video was taken from, etc.) and what was mistaken as muzzle rise at the time a shot is heard is the shooter raising his barrel to make the area safe for officers responding to the roof where the dead guy is laying. He then lowered his muzzle so it was pointed in a safe direction. But based on my knowledge he should have stayed on gun until responding officers confirmed the other shooter was dead. He also would have pulled the bolt to the rear to make the gun safe if he wasn't going to be back on gun. Plus, who fired the three shots if the SS sniper had killed the other shooter with the first shot? Something isn't adding up.
Thanks for posting this video. Look who was seated behind Trump when the ear shot happened. Black hat. Dark jacket, light shirt. Looks like Vincent Fusca to me. Standing there, big as life, when everyone else is hitting the deck...
I find Julie Greene's transcriptions very encouraging.
In all the videos I first saw (including from the Wall Street Journal), you can clearly hear at least 7-8 shots. A friend suspected they might be taken down, or at least the audio removed. Maybe that happened?
If you view and listen to the 2nd video I posted above, where only Trump is in the field of view, you can hear the initial three shots followed by four or five more. To my ears, they are all from the same gun and that has to be the SS snipers rifle or a different rifle near that building. If any of those shots had been from the kid sniper who was 400 feet away, the sound of his shots would have been greatly attenuated.
Yes, that is the one I had seen previously! At least 8 shots total, more than half I think after he dropped.
What's bizarre to me are the theories that the ear graze was intentional. Uh no...that would be one hell of a Risk to take since an inch difference leads to a very different result.
There's no way a sniper could 'stage' shooting an ear - there are too many risks. It's either a head / body shot accompanied by an act of God, or staged with fake blood. If we go down the staged route, there is a lot of unsavory collateral.
If Trump is in on it, then maybe Paul is dead after all...
And perhaps John is alive....
Now that we have had at least 36 hours to process, we can see that there was an absolute failure on the part of the multiple law enforcement officers involved in the protection detail of former president Trump.
Having been in the military, law enforcement , and an elected official, the gaps in security were very severe.
The big question we need to know is if there were others involved in this assassination attempt, and who.
Will the lazy FBI actually look into others involved, and who will be prosecuted?
In my mind, there is no way a 20, non-military trained kid can actually pull off this type of action. The logistics of it are more than he could comprehend, and who taught him to make explosives anyway?
Why was his van loaded with bombs?
How did he know that, that building was within line of sight?
Who put the ladder there, and when?
Who paid for the materials to make the bombs?
So many other questions that need answers, but we need some one to investigate, and come up with them, then that info has to be declassified for the puplics use.
Do not seeing this happening, already they are getting ready to close the investigation, as has been stated in the media.
Agreed, the Crooks character was just a manufactured patsy.
https://thegoodcitizen.live/p/earesistible-trajectories
Thank you.
I am real tired of all the childish conspiracy theories that say the assassination of President Trump, though failed through Providence, was an orchestrated plan by Trump & his "Secret Society of White Hats," staged to somehow teach Americans a lesson or other. My word! Get a real life. LOL!!!!
Our eyes did not deceive us in real time as we watched it all go down. Including the live, non-state interviews, after the fact, of all the direct witnesses involved at the scene, long before the Shadow Government had the chance to cleanse all their stories and censor all their independent videos.
Anyone that says it was "staged" has never yet produced any material evidence to support their asinine assertions & infantile opinions. Thus:
It is clear President Trump is NOT in control behind the scenes. (Never was. LOL!)
It is clear the Luciferian Cabal is.
If we can name any specific Deep State Player, they are not in control. (However, rethink in terms of the Gettys.)
President Donald J. Trump did NOT plan to whack his own self, fomenting another bloody Civil War. And, he could not have, not in a million years, dodged that bullet so miraculously. Not even with a Trillion chances.
Just because the Shadow Government of young players are manipulating Biden & the Deep, Administrative State behind the scenes doesn't at all mean it is "staged." (Whatever that means.) - Former Chan Q-Decoder; now undeceived.
"Shadow Men"
https://montanarcc.substack.com/p/trump-assassination-attempt-forecast
This poster admits he was once a follower of 'Q'. Enough said. That's some REALLY low level discernment, lol.
If one simply knows basic cryptography and how occultists work, and what Q 'means'......one would never believe Q from jump street.
Low discernment level.
Trump is 100% a part of their gang. And a major player in their upcoming plans. If they truly wanted Trump dead would they allow some milquetoasty looking creature with limited shooting skills onto a rooftop only to fail.....retarded. There's a million ways they could take him, or anyone out. People are so blind.
'Politics' - is emotional professional wrestling. This entire thing was the WWE.
At one point I fell for Q, and I wouldn't call my discernment low. Anyone can fall for traps, what matters is what you do when you find out it's a trap.
At this point, anybody who refused the jabs and held out despite the carrots and sticks can pat themselves on the back and consider their discernment excellent.
Q made people feel special with inside information. I thought it sounded too much like a trend a few years earlier when everyone was going to get all their tax money back, or something like that.
Operation Trust (or hope?) based on Bolshevik propaganda, it kept everyone in limbo, no one took action.
You nailed it Rosalind. Exactly. It keeps everyone passive with 'white hats are taking care of it all behind the scenes nonsense.'
Long before "Q" - there were MANY other psyop people and movements which had the exact same story line as "Q". One such person was a man named 'Drake'. A goofy 'insider' guy who espoused the exact same nonsense as Q. Zero difference. This was back in 2011/2012. There were others as well. Always with the same story, even using the same verbiage - white hats arresting baddies behind the scenes but the plebs cannot handle the truth so you will still see them in power.
People fall for it every time. It is similar to the innumerable New Agers/Soiritual types I used to know who considered themselves 'higher consciousness' and 'high vibration', who then all took the jabs and fell for all the propaganda. There's no higher consciousness, and there's no coming back from that, ever. Those people can never again claim to be higher consciousness than the rest of humanity who are pretending to be asleep. I used to know many many people of this ilk, as that was who populated Portland, Oregon. The vast majority of them need to retire now as life coaches, as they should not be wielding influence towards others. Most, still do not even know there's an organized, syndicated crime syndicate wit a very pernicious intention in this world, but they are coaching others.
Phew. Rough stuff.
Not ALL New Agers took the jab
I know a lot that did not
The new agers are getting sick and they think it’s “ signs of ascension “ So sad. I can’t get through to any of them.
Does the CIA give you a list of talking points for you to post in one of your many accounts or do they give you some leeway to be creative?
What's the pay like?
Hey , he really might be retired.
Why didn't it blow a hole in his head?
That's obvious. Trump is a man of steel. The bullet bounced off his skull, hitting the ear on the rebound. Underneath that mundane suit, he wears a Superman costume.
MEDIA Bias
I posted Trump events on FB; taken down by FB - I contested, FB put back up
I posted dem's calls - incl Biden’s - for Trumps assassination (clearly inciting violence, acts against community standards one would think) were not fact checked or taken down by FB
Who is this Woman? ...
MERYL NASS
JUL 15, 2024
https://x.com/DMichaelTripi/status/1812659285039501385
This is what it showed. A 40-something woman with long dark hair and sunglasses was close to the front of the crowd near Trump, vaguely seemed to be waiting for something. When shots rang out and people started screaming, she briefly ducked, perhaps to grab her phone, then immediately started filming. Whole thing was done expressionlessly, cool as a cucumber, unaffected by the turmoil around her and not trying to protect herself in the immediate aftermath. It was extremely unusual and concerning.
Yeah, so, do you think we'll ever learn her name and why she raised the sign? I'd put the odds at 60/40 right now, 60 that we learn nothing.
Particularly because she apparently raises a Biden for President sign just after Trump is shot.
Her sign says, "Biden, You're Fired"
Good point. It's pretty easy to make false accusations with limited info. I doubt we'll ever get to the bottom of this. Politics trumps truth!
That woman doesn't demonstrate sufficient suspicious behavior to warrant this theory. People behave different in chaotic crisis moments like this.
seems to me Trump was wide open on the stage... seems like they should have had se sort of bullet proof barrier as a protective screen
& the flags indicate how the wind is blowing. Helped the shooter whomever that is.
Biden’s use of “inappropriate” brings to mind Obama’s declaring that the deaths of Ambassador Stevens and his security team in Benghazi was “suboptimal”. Kind of makes ya wonder who’s writing Joe’s talking points.
Thanks for your post - additional information, well formulated and the only voice suggesting the inside job's plausible source (including the most pertinent information, well structured intro precedes this) :
Escaping Mass Psychosis
https://escapingmasspsychosis.substack.com/p/thoughts-on-the-assassination-attempt?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=484620&post_id=146626528&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=true&r=12vcal&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email
GUESTS
Thoughts on the Assassination Attempt
Letters from O'Brien #59
WINSTON SMITH
JUL 15, 2024
Most significant portion of the post:
So, here’s a theory which could line up with current events…
The timing of the event is suspicious. If the assassination had been successful, the Republicans would have had to choose another candidate at the Republican National Convention, happening about now. Given that it took place after the crucial debates which sealed Bidens fate, this makes me wonder if it was a coup attempt by a Republican conspiracy.
Consider that only two other candidates on ‘his side’ have delegates: Ron DeSantis, and Nikki Haley. While Haley is a neocon and DeSantis is undecided, both align in the three crucial sectors; they support the Israel lobby, they support the intelligence agencies current leadership, and they back wars in the Middle East and Europe. Trump does not.
Note also that some time ago, Vivek Ramaswamy went on record saying that the only reason Nikki Haley had not dropped out - despite having zero populist support - was because her donors were “plotting to eliminate Trump from the ballet”.
To address the three major institutions - the intelligence agencies, Israel lobby, and military contractors - one must look at Trumps rhetoric. This explains why his own party would be motivated to take him out. I will draw comparisons with the most obvious individual - JFK.
The first issue is the Israel lobby. Thus far Trump’s biggest donors have been Zionists and Silicon Valley technocrats. The Zionists - most notably the mega wealthy Miriam Adelson - do not appear to be supporting Trump. There is strong incentive for a conservative leadership to provide military aid to Israel. Why? Firstly, Netanyahu needs war to stay in office, and when he eventually steps down (which will happen once the conflict ends) he would likely be indicted on various corruption charges and probably end up in prison. Secondly - or rather on a deeper level - Netanyahu could be seen as a pawn. Those holding power - like his finance minister and others unnamed - also desire war; under the justification of ‘national security’ they seek to destroy Israel’s regional rivals (Lebanon, Iran) and expand their borders to create ‘Greater Israel’.
Thus, it came as a surprise to many that Trump - despite receiving over $100 million from Zionist donors - never bowed down in worship towards Israel. Both DeSantis and Haley have, in fact they speak of Israel as they would speak of God. What’s more, Trump also went on record not too long ago, claiming that Netanyahu received ‘justified criticism’ for the 7/10 attack last year. This suggests that Trump has not yet yielded to his donors completely. This makes him a threat to Israel lobby, as he may be unwilling to finance another major middle eastern war. For the Zionist leadership, maybe is not a good enough guarantee when it comes to military aid; without America Israel’s military grinds to a halt.
Likewise, Kennedy angered these groups, since he advocated for three things; Palestinian right-of-return to Israel, a shut down on the Israeli nuclear weapons program, and the registration of AIPAC as a foreign agent (through FARA). In my view it seems that this was the final straw which landed him in a coffin.
The second major player is the intelligence community, or more specifically the Silicon Valley technocrats who have evidently taken over the security apparatus. Key figures here (who are relevant to the Trump administration) are Peter Thiel (who rose to prominence thanks to funding from neocon Irving Kristol), and his proteges JD Vance, Curtis Yarvin, and so forth. This movement seeks to - as Thiel once put it - create a ‘techno monarchy’ in America. Many within the right-leaning Silicon Valley scene appear to be neoconservatives, who advocate for mass surveillance, invasive technologies, and so forth. Thiel even said that the CIA is a front for Palantir - his infamous digital security firm. And, they appear to have no issue with the Israel lobby or the military industrial complex.
Likewise, Kennedy promised to splinter the CIA into a thousand pieces, reigning in their black projects which were becoming increasingly detached from any sense of national security. They too went after him because of this.
Which brings me to the last important group of players, the military contractors. These are arguably the most financially powerful, although not the most influential on this list. It seems obvious that out of all the republican candidates, Trump is the only (perhaps save Vivek, who was quickly removed) to stand against expanded geopolitical hostility. DeSantis yields to his donors, whilst Haley literally worked as a defence contractor, and now desires to send American troops to Israel and Ukraine. Trump - in contrast - has made it obvious that peace in the Middle East is of top priority. He has also suggested that the Ukraine war will be ended before he is even officially inaugurated. Putin has said he is onboard with this. The outcome will be obvious; Ukraine will be integrated with Russia in some way, essentially becoming a rump state. Everyone in the neocon sphere fumes at the thought of this; NATO, the RNC, and of course the contractors. Note that the contractors are not only sending existing surplus weapons to Ukraine (as we are often told), but they are also actively replenishing supplies. They aren’t doing this for free, and what they charge is beyond insane.
Likewise, Kennedy sought to end the Cold War. After the failed Great Leap Forward he wanted to normalise relations with China, whilst a thawing Soviet Union meant that peace with the Russians was very possible. This all came crashing down with his assassination. It wasn’t just him who tried this; his brother sought peace, and he also paid with his life. Later, Nixon and Kissinger would also try for peace with China and Russia, only to be conveniently tied up in corruption claims and removed from office, with all their progress reverted by the neocons in the Ford administration.
Thus, with all this in mind, one can see why his ‘own’ people would be willing to sacrifice him. They would benefit financially, socially, and politically through incentives. If Trump had been successfully taken out, then realistically the events which followed would have looked something like this; liberals receive the blowback for the event, Haley or DeSantis are selected to lead, the people rally behind them as they use dialectical rhetoric to stoke anger towards the left while obfuscating from the right, they enter office and proceed to operate as agents of all three major institutions mentioned, and for the next four years ride off of the anger produced during the Trump shooting.
If everything had gone to plan, they would have a Haley or DeSantis presidency, and this cabinet would allow all three interest groups to benefit at the expense of the American people’s tax dollars, or with their lives. It would arguably be worse than another Biden presidency, since I doubt DeSantis or Haley would even bother addressing what would have been the one potential upside - the deportation of illegals and the shutting of the border.
For this reason, with the information currently available, I believe that the Trump shooting could have been an attempted coup. The liberal establishment are still adversaries of the people, but in this case, I think the shots were fired by his own party in a bid to change the direction of the presidency. For the moment at least, it failed, thank God.
These major interest groups are what sway the White House. This is why the Trump administration needs proper staff; true loyalists who stand by America, not by contractors, foreign agencies, and money. This is what Project 2025 is all about, and it is why such a project needs to be adopted by Trump. By what appears to be divine intervention, he lives to see another day and this should be his cue to truly go all-in during this coming presidency; end foreign interference, end bribery from contractors and corporations, and truly attempt to fix America.
Sincerely yours,
O’Brien
After concluding that Trump didn't/couldn't have used a squib and that was a real shot to his ear with real blood, it's tough to conclude that it was anything other than a close call and a true injury. The downplaying was obviously pre-planned. There is weirdness both from what look like operatives in the audience and the DEI-hired women SS officers who were bumbling fools, and way too short to cover Trump. I also wonder why the gunman's entire online social presence was scrubbed before anyone could find anything, and why the SS patently ignored those people screaming about seeing the gunman on the roof. Also, the snipers obviously SAW the guy climbing onto the roof. And that tip any alarms? Nevermind this guy who's supposedly spilling the beans saying he was not given the OK. What were the snipers doing while the guy was climbing up the ladder and getting in place?
He asked for his shoes before they took him out of the stadium. A common response when someone is in the midst of a tragedy or if a person is in shock is to focus on making sure you don't leave your belongings behind. I read a book about the strange things people do in crisis situations. People have been killed after airplane accidents because the evacuation from the airplane was stalled as people were trying to carry their luggage off of the plane with them. He's never been one of them and they've made it very obvious that they rabidly despise him. They don't treat their own that way, even when one of their own isn't playing the game right. Every president that I know of who's awakened to the fact that there is some kind of sinister underbelly at play and said so has had either been assassinated or there has been an attempt to take their life. Don't let the questioning of this incident divide us. They wanted to kill Donald Trump and start a civil war. Fortunately, they didn't succeed. Don't let them finish the job by sowing division because we (rightfully) have questions.
It's amusing to see how many people second-guess human behavior in unique crisis situations as if 1) everyone behaves the same and therefore should behave the same, and 2) they always have to behave in a "logical" way according to the armchair quarterback in question.
Exactly!
Crooks. Isn't the name of the official perpetrator too obvious?
I shudder to think that man was 15-16 when this war started in 2020.
Also, the name Thomas. Like the skeptic apostle. He didn't believe the other apostles when they told him Jesus was alive. He demanded to see the holes in his hands and put his finger on them, and see the wound on his side, and then he would believe.
Does Trump have a hole in his bullet-grazed ear? Was he meant to have one?
Crooks-exactly isn’t that crazy?
Crooked Joe Biden. Crooked Hillary. Everyone is crooked. All insiders are crooks. Vote for me to drain the swamp.
You get my vote - yesssss!
Lol, nice post.
Crooks - not a coincidence.
If people would simply read Michael Hoffman's "Secret Societies and Psychological Warfare," they will see how occultists work.
A crook is also a hooked staff carried by a shepherd for leading sheep.
"By hook or by crook" means "by any means necessary."
At the beginning of each episode of The Prisoner, Number 2 tells Number , "Information. We want information." Number Six shouts back "You won't get it!! And then Number 2 laughs, "By hook or by crook, we will!" I guess this is as well known to people of a certain age in the UK as "To boldly go where no man has gone before" or "This tape will self destruct in ten seconds" is in the US.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sv813f2Xtrg
OK, watching this now, I see that Number 2 doesn't laugh until a bit later on.
Come on, Celia. Was Corey Comperatore‘s murder “staged”?? I’m really disappointed.
aw, disappointed by speculation, where the author even specifies that she leans towards "the assassination attempt was real, and planned."
I'm so sorry for your hurt feelings that she mentioned both points of view
No (so-called) “hurt feelings”, Some Dude, but thanks 🙏 for your faux concern. Seems a tad like virtue signaling to me, but what do I know about only having my own specific and individual point-of-view/perspective.
Some rabbit holes I avoid going down.
Good discernment
This wise, especially since some rabbit holes are specifically made to go nowhere.
Like Elizabeth Warren. That's a great name for a rabbit hole.
Today's SS by M Hoffman: Assassination Revelation (of the Method)
The Cryptocracy is laughing at us
MICHAEL HOFFMAN
JUL 15, 2024