I’ve been examining the media coverage, and detectable “ops” within the streams, about what Salon has now called “The Kate Middleton Mystery,” in probably the most comprehensive timeline article yet, available here. I hope it goes without saying that this isn’t a “Royal Watcher” story, but something uniquely strange in our lifetimes.
For me this reminds me of Thailand princess Ong Bha, who collapsed suddenly at 44 years old while walking her dogs on the royal palace grounds, in December of 2022. There have been basically no updates on her condition. Wikipedia simply lists her as still in a coma. A veil is pierced when it seems to be reaching the royals...
Recall what happened to Kate's husband's mother, Diana. Once she had produced an heir and a spare, they had no more use for her. Looks like the same thing may be playing out....
Kate (not that I'm especially interested in any of the family, although this recent story is certainly curious) seems never to step out of line.. not even briefly...like she was made/programmed for the 'role'. Diana, on the other hand, became something of a lose canon, a liability.
Kate's surely as asset; great re PR for the org, well liked by the media, monarchy fans, etc. What purpose would doing away with her serve?
Good point, Diana had become a liability, also because of her campaign against land mines. Perhaps William, like his father, has a preference for a different mate? Who knows what's behind all this...
How about Celine Dion? Isn't she part of the elite club? It is clear that she also had been injured by the mRNA shots. Looks like that in this global operation there are also collateral damages. Sasha Latypova said in one of her interviews that the master minds behind all this is nobody else then the Department of Defence. If this is a military operation, do you think they would care who gets the real shots and who doesn't? Why would the DOD be interested, since this is a military operation? That's not their concern. They have a mission and the only thing that matters to them is to accomplish it successfully. I don't deny that there may be much more behind the scenes. This is why investigating journalists are so important. Because at the end of the day, they will be the ones to uncover the truth.
A commenter on another site just questioned how Sasha came to have the documents about DOD complicity. Apparently, she banned a commenter on her site who asked her about it (I did not read the comment but the commenter can be rather brash from what I have read of him on others sites)
In any case, it did get me wondering. How DID she get all that info?
A bit off topic here, but people might want to keep an eye on the pfizer whistleblower case that Robert Barnes is litigating for Brooke Jackson. That story itself is quite interesting, but what is more chilling is the email Attny Barnes received from the United States Dept of Justice last week informing him in one sentance that they would be taking over the case.
I have watched Barnes on various sites over the past 2 years. He is a brilliant Constitutional lawyer.
There is a scheduled hearing in April in the ongoing case to determine if the case can go foreward. If it does go foreward that is when the DOJ will step in.
Thankfully, there are all type of hoops that the DOJ has to jump through, which Barnes is all set to implement should it be necessary.
In case you were not aware - the 1986 Vaccine Act that grants immunity from liability to pharma, also guarantees you your day in court in case your healthy little baby starts screaming in agony all night after a shot and never speaks a coherent word again.yu
The United States Vaccine Court. So you essentially suit the government, not the pharma company. And who represents the United States Government?
The Department of Justice.
How's THAT for scary?
I have listened to family members that went through the torturous process of being dragged through the mud in these cases. And the bold face lying by DOJ.
(I will probably be visited by the men in black for that little comment, but Mother of God, it is astonishing.)
Every movie we have watched since the 60's - Parallex View, Three Days of the Condor, Enemies of the State, Michael Clayton, and many more, all spell it out. And we think it's entertainment.
John Le Carre novels, too.
Sorry for the rant. Sometimes it is just so overwhelmingly stupifying.
It was Katherine Watt who reviewed the leaked Pfizer contract and the documents Brooke Jackson was using. Sasha works with Katherine to translate her research to the masses using her skills and experience with big pharma.
Would love any more info about this commenter / DOD document question. I thought / think Sasha is really above board but you never know, any info to look
Up appreciated. I was shocked to see how Robert Malone has an odd history and track record with this stuff too.
You also shouldn't forget the HHS (U.S. Health & Human Services), for they helped streamline COVID-19 vaccine production and disbursement to the masses. Their involvement makes perfect sense as they're simply an extension of the Medical Industrial Complex. And the NIH is under their auspices, too.
I wondered that about Celine. At this point, man I would be talking. Seriously, what can compensate you after you've been injured in that fashion? Afraid of death? There are worse fates.
if she actually got the 'vaccines,' she probably also made sure that her sons and the rest of her loved ones (and employees) got them, too. in which case she would not want to believe she is 'vaccine' injured.
Doubt she ever got any of the vaccines. And she certainly wouldn't allow her children or loved ones to have them, either. They aren't that stupid to do so.
Being a Brit, this is a big topic for a lot of us. Where the hell is Kate? Weird things are happening to the Royal Family such as William appearing with bruises on his neck after the so-called suicide of Thomas Kingston, son in law of Prince Michael of Kent, the masonic head. Plus Princess Anne's husband appearing with a black eye and claiming it to be a gardening accident. Not sure Charles has cancer: it may well be a ploy to promote a miraculous cure by Pfizer.
The thing is, the Royal Family has form - look at what happened to Di who knew she was going to be killed and was supposedly pregnant with her lover's son.
"Abolishing monarchies would be one of the goals of the New World Order." never considered that.
but...if the current global situation is a contract killing orchestrated by the killers, it would make sense that they'd want to take out those they convinced to pay for it
and btw has that thai princess been seen in public lately?
"Abolishing monarchies would be one of the goals of the New World Order."
No, it would not. Of this I am 100% certain.
The British aristocracy is at the helm of the NWO! King Charles gave the speech in January 2021 which announced the Great Reset at WEF's Davos. Klaus Schwab was knighted by the Queen!
You will learn that the British Royal Family are the Saxe Coburg & Gotha, descended from the Guelph who are at the top of the old dynasty from the Venetian Black Nobility.
The NWO is a totalitarian scheme to ensure that the existing ruling class continues to rule while the rest of humanity is enslaved without possibility of escape as explained here:
The United Nations has teamed with the World Economic Forum since 2019 to implement the UN Agenda 2030 Sustainable Development Goals, an interpretation of which is here:
Here, in the UK, we hear rumours that there was a physical fight over the recent Christmas period in which Princess Kate was seriously injured. There has been no sight of her since that rumour went around. We think she is dead and everything we are seeing in the press is a cover up. If she subsequently 'dies' due to 'medical complications' we will know that her body has been on ice, waiting for the right moment in which to conduct a funeral.
You must understand that the Royals do commit murder, vis a vis the terrible assault on the Russian royals that you referenced.
There is also a Nostradamus quatrain which claims that King Charles will not reign for long.
The deck will be clear for William to take the throne and there are rumours that he is a very unsavoury character.
I am sorry to burst your bubble.... really I am.... but what happened to Princess Diana really should have woken Americans up to what our Royal family is really about.
Edit:
I have created a fresh post from the above with additional info if anyone is interested:
Yes, agree w/you Frances on the Black Nobility & on how monarchies/elites often play out (as you have documented so convincingly in your BN histories). People should remember the intense Shakespearian drama behind the Charles, Diana & Camilla Royals story-line. Arranged marriage/marital infidelity, political manipulations/revelations, physical threats by the palace & Diana's eventual murder. And all of it played out in public in real time.
There is a lot of speculation about him. Apparently he was a very moral man..... so who knows what he knew and what he may have done with that knowledge?
the kids have been seen on video looking 'normal' and even happy, so it's hard to believe they haven't seen their mother (or know that she's dead). after seeing the tragus on the ear purported to be catherine's (the car pic), I'm going with facelift. and if it hasn't healed enough yet, she wouldn't be appearing in photos.
I’ve thought all along it was cosmetic surgery (maybe also abdominal surgery) and she can’t be seen in public until swelling and healing is complete. I hope it’s not more sinister than that.
they'd surely say if she were pregnant, no? maybe a hysterectomy? that was my first thought when they said 'abdominal surgery,' but after seeing the picture of her ear (in the car with william, head turned away) I began thinking she had a facelift and doesn't want anyone to know.
That is a possibility that I had not considered, Mzlizzi. I hope you are right.
However, I have a very ominous feeling about it. If she were in hospital with a wall of paparazzi around the doors, why weren't there reports of the children visiting? Why did William only go once? That suggests she wasn't there or she is dead. I don't trust the Black Nobs to ever tell the truth about anything, tbh...
While I don't disagree with the statement that the British Royal Family are Black Nobility having been a part of the Hapsburg dynasty your statement regarding the goal of the NWO being to remove the European Royal families is false.
That was very much part of the World Revolutionaries goal which was borne of the secret societies and was the reason for the removal and deaths of the French Royal family during the revolution and also the removal of the Russian royal family during their same revolution.
The occult group behind that were given payback for their rejection by these families when they sought to takeover Europe. At the time in England a similar strain was running the East India Co similar to the Dutch (really a joint venture) and these internationalists / corporatists were being thwarted by the Westphalian declaration and the creation of the modern nation state.
As a result they vowed to get payback on those who rejected their plan. The reason the RF have prospered is probably 2 fold. First the creation through birth of the Anglo Zio nation state which saw the likes of the Rothschild's and their co-religionists marry into English nobility and secondly their willingness to sacrifice their roles of the defenders of sovereignty to do these peoples bidding.
"your statement regarding the goal of the NWO being to remove the European Royal families is false." - Pardon? I did not make that statement. I was quoting Celia and then refuting it. Therefore the rest of your comment makes no sense to me. Sorry.
The statement was "Abolishing monarchies would be one of the goals of the New World Order." - to which you replied "No, it would not. Of this I am 100% certain."
My comment was a reply to that which I repeat is false.
The evidence for that is the generational aims of those behind the World Revolution. They created the French, Irish, American and Russian revolutions and the lodges were a tool to achieve that aim. Their goal has always been a war on Christianity and the over throw of the European Royal dynasties.
Thats where the Black Nobility argument runs into the long grass because it doesn't explain the brutal butchering of the French and Russian nobilities. After all they are all part of the same family.
The group responsible also saw the creation of communism and Zionism and facilitated the creation of Israel as a 'gift' to Mr Rothschild. They have been described as Sabbatean Frankists with links back to the secret societies of Germany which facilitated so much of the upheaval in Europe in the last 150 years.
But there is much more to that and its a complex web with many strands.
The British Crown (run by Venetian Black Nobility now established in the City of London) are responsible for attempting to annihilate any royal families who objected to their form of totalitarian globalism. They sponsored the Jesuits and secured the Jesuits as a military wing for the Pope. They undertook education projects in Germany which resulted in the establishment of the Illuminati and caused them to be disbanded by a very sensible Pope. Another was installed and he allowed the Jesuits back into action. It was Jesuit influence which triggered the revolutions in France, America and virtually anywhere else!
It was Jesuits who went on to develop Communism in their 'Reducciones' of South America. They infiltrated most of the higher education centres and taught communism to Marx, Lenin and many others. Their missionaries took Communism into China. Their students became the banksters who funded infiltrations into Russia and murdered the Russian Royal family.
You will note that it is always the City of London which instigates hatefests against the Russians, the Chinese and Iran.
The Temple B.A.R. (British Accreditation Registry) is controlled by the Black Nobility and ensures that every member worldwide, directly or indirectly obeys the RULE OF LAW. They have re-established the Roman Empire and they make sure that they employ Jews in all their top corporate positions because Jews make perfect human shields. People like you will always produce your ill-informed alternative histories, citing minor characters like the Sabbatean Frankists to muddy the waters and providing cover for the Black Nobility.
I am not sorry that you chose to challenge me. You have shown me, and undoubtedly many other readers, just how deceptive history can be and how it has been rewritten over and over to conceal the truth.
You might like to learn a little more about the Rule of Law, in which case I recommend that you study closely the following document:
I haven't chosen to 'challenge you' I pointed out your initial statement was wrong which I stand by.
Most of the rest of your comment I don't really disagree with up to a point but having looked at your blog and comments I would say that you are missing the most important ingredient.
A lot of this comes down to semantics and some is just plain wrong. Sabbatei Zevi is not muddying any waters its referencing a very important element missing from your analysis and that is what connects all these groups together and who do they serve?
You reference a lot of Walter Zeith in your analysis but appear to reject the Christian dimension. That I believe is pivotal to understanding this but because what connects all these elements together is Luciferianism. That comes in many flavours but is the bedrock of Freemasonry, Kabbalah as well as Judaism. I could see why someone might want to hide that away.
Because it is central to the goal of a movement whose goal is the destruction of Christianity and ultimately the seating of their own messiah in Jerusalem. Pike was clear enough what the end game was.
St Paul in Ephesian's 6:12 explains who the rulers of this world are and they are found in 'spiritual wickedness in high places'. The prince of this world is satan which is why he was able to offer Christ his dominion if only Hhe would worship him.
It might be suggestive of trying to hide that message in saying the Sabbatean element is 'muddying the waters.' Without understand that there can be no real clarity over what is happening.
It was the Pharisees who crucified Christ and have been at war with Christianity ever since.
For a true understanding you would need to show who the Black Nobility worship and how they connect to this group behind the World Revolution.
That aspect of this cannot be simply hidden away because it has been pivotal to understanding what has been happening in the west for the last few hundred years and overall since the death of Christ.
I will of course follow your link so thanks for that.
Absolutely right. If there is an orchestrated takedown of royals, it is by a force opposed to the NWO (White Hat/Q theory).
Apart from that, I remember reading a long time ago that royal wives were all transgenders and disposable as part of the Satanic cult, it's true that Kate does have a thick neck and large shoulders.
There is no White Hat or Q force opposed to the NWO. Royal wives are not transgenders because they have all produced children. The Royals are not Satanist or involved with any kind of cult. Kate is remarkably slim, too slim actually. She is not a man. Where on earth do you get all these crazy ideas?
Please read about atheists and nihilists. They are not Satanists!
I guess they mean abolishing monarchies that aren't in tow with the NWO agenda. So far, this doesn't describe the British monarchy nor the other European monarchies where NWO plots are in full swing (mass illegal immigration, vaccines, etc.) Those monarchies wouldn't be harmed since they're going along with the program perfectly.
You wrote a fascinating story! I wonder why should we not be interested in what the Royal Family is hiding? The more they play this game the more curious people will become. There is no way around it. I agree with Toby Rogers that the Princess has been very likely injured by the mRNA shots. I also agree with the Spanish journalist who claims that the Princess is very sick. Sasha Latypova wrote an interesting Substack on this story: she says that they are trying to eliminate the Royal Family, just like Celia said. The New World Order doesn't need any royals. Strange things are happening indeed. George Soros wrote a book many years ago, soon after the 2008 crisis. I remember he was talking about a New World Order. Back then, I had no clue what he was talking about.
Re: "Sasha Latypova wrote an interesting Substack on this story: she says that they are trying to eliminate the Royal Family, just like Celia said. The New World Order doesn't need any royals." -
(Critically, I agree w/ many others here who have already mentioned that the so-called Royals & monarchy world-wide are an intrinsic part of the NWO themselves so why would the NWO take out their very useful NWO Royals/puppets unless... stupidly & greedily... they are eating their own i.e."the - NWO - fish rots from the head down"???)
I have searched Sasha's ss articles to find a title or subject that might relate to your comment & found several Sasha stacks related to the overall NWO planning/plots that I've pasted in below.
fyi The Sasha ss re: Catherine Austin Fitts' & another re: the documentary are brilliant analyses.
> Why are they doing it? Eugenics to Pandemics Documentary - Historical and ideological background of the globalist death cult. - May 26, 2023 - Sasha Latypova
> Breaking: Candid Camera Recording of Bill Gates and Tony Fauci Discussing Evil Plans
Finally! The smoking gun evidence found. - Mar 19, 2023 - Sasha Latypova
> Clarification of My Message on the Global Mass Murder Campaign I know whodunit, I only guess who ordered it. - Mar 9, 2023 - Sasha Latypova
> D4CE Symposium 5, Session III: Getting Away From the Control Grid - Doctors For Covid Ethics Symposium Series - Jan 25, 2023 - Sasha Latypova
> INTENT TO HARM - EVIDENCE OF THE CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT MASS MURDER BY THE US DOD, HHS, PHARMA CARTEL - This is an audio track of my presentation. Full video version is available here: https://www.bitchute.com/video/8ftbShzrkjl9/ - Dec 4, 2022 - Sasha Latypova
I don't think they're really going to eliminate any royals here. Most likely, they'll just fake their deaths/disappearances and exile them somewhere with new aliases. We have seen this with the Romanovs and the French Bourbons that were allegedly killed in the French and Russian revolutions.
Allegedly killed? Do you have any links or cites w/confirmed info to share for your opinion?
Not sure what you say is true as there have been lots of archival documentation & artifacts plus archaeological evidence shared proving the royals in Russia & France were violently killed.
See for example this article w/very believable/confiming evidence & dated archival documents > Friday 23 July 1999 - Secret files tell of final terrors for Romanovs - Paul Lashmar
Excerpt: The newly declassified files, compiled at great personal risk by British diplomats and secret agents, were handed over yesterday by the Foreign Secretary, Robin Cook, to his Russian counterpart, Igor Ivanov, at a ceremony at the Foreign Office. They contained hundreds of documents from the British archives on the death of the last Tsar and his family at the hands of the Bolsheviks.
The exchange of documents came as Mr Cook and Mr Ivanov signed a memorandum of co-operation between the archives of the two foreign ministries. In return Mr Ivanov handed over original documents captured by Soviet forces from the Germans at the end of the Second World War. They relate largely to the fate of British prisoners of war held by the Germans.
According to a Foreign Office spokesman many of the British files on the murder of the Romanov family were classified as "top secret" until this release. They contain voluminous encrypted correspondence between the Foreign Office and its representatives in the field from 1918 to 1920. Some are hand-written letters between King George, Nicholas's cousin, and the then foreign secretary, AJ Balfour.
The Russian royal family was related to many of Europe's dynasties, and the Bolshevik revolution sent a chill wind through the rest of Europe. The files show how much the murder of the Tsar and his family shook the British state and confirmed the worst fears of the brutal nature of the Russian revolution.
Once you read down thru this article on the chronology of the archival documentation, it seems impossible to me that all or most of this evidence was falsified. What do you think?
Also, isn't it convenient that soon after the White Army captured Ekaterinburg, they easily found 'proof' of remains near where the Romanovs were allegedly buried, which included priceless jewelry and trinkets strewn about? You'd think that if the Bolsheviks wanted to thoroughly cover-up incriminating evidence of their crimes that they would've easily taken all the prized possessions for themselves and dumped the bones in an area much harder to excavate than an empty mine shaft. This is especially true when you consider that they were the first to spread rumors about their royal captives still being alive. To me, it feels as though such evidence was planted to distract any potential investigators from looking at the right places.
I don't know what you are referring to here as "finding remains" since factual info I've read says that the Romanov bodies were recovered in 1979 & NOT in July 1918 during the capture of Ekaterinburg, which is what you are implying.
See dates of the capture timeline (when you say later included finding the Romanovs' remains after their murders by Bolsheviks on July 16-17) >
1918 > Murders of Czar Nicholas II of Russia and His Family - ThoughtCo
[This is what you refer to but no mention of Romanovs' remains found.]
> "As the White Army gained ground and headed for Ekaterinburg, the Bolsheviks decided they must act swiftly. The Romanovs must not be rescued. At 2:00 a.m. in the morning on July 17, 1918, Nicholas, his wife, and their five children, along with four servants, were awakened and told to prepare for departure." etc etc
In fact, this article above says clearly >
"The remains were buried at two separate sites. An investigation soon after the murders failed to turn up the bodies of the Romanovs and their servants."
And the DNA identifications of the Romanovs' remains found much later in 1979 were not made until 1991 (as it was only from the mid 1980s-early 1990s when the technique became more widely available for forensic examination of remains in criminal cases).
One has to admit now that DNA identification is now considered standard procedures to ID remains in well-known cases. So were the Romanovs' discovered "DNA identified remains" a hoax too or is the DNA validation of the 1979 found remains real?
Thanks for sharing your links & I'll have a look at the 2004 link later on today. The other link you shared "The File on the Tsar" was published in 1976 or BEFORE the so-called, identified Romanovs' remains were found in 1979 & identified in 1991. So don't think the 1976 book is authoritative at this point.
> "The file on the Tsar Hardcover - January 1, 1976 - amazon .com"
Instead see here > July 17, 2018 - DNA Analysis Confirms Authenticity of Romanovs’ Remains - Will Russia’s fallen royal family finally receive a full burial from the Orthodox Church? - Brigit Katz - Correspondent
Excerpt: Today marks the 100th anniversary of the execution of Nicholas II and his family, an event that toppled Russia’s Romanov dynasty. Yesterday, as the country was preparing to commemorate their deaths, Russian investigators announced that new DNA testing had confirmed that remains attributed to last tsar and his family are in fact authentic—a finding that may pave the way for the deceased royals to be buried with full rites by the Orthodox Church, according to Agence France-Presse.
The Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation, which is responsible for probing serious crimes, said DNA analysis “confirmed the remains found belonged to the former Emperor Nicholas II, his family members and members of their entourage.” As part of the new tests, investigators exhumed the body of Nicholas' father, Alexander III to prove that the two are related, and also took DNA samples from living members of the Romanov family, according to the Moscow Times.
The new findings are the latest development in a tangled dispute over the remains of the Romanovs, whose downfall was nigh after Nicholas II was forced to abdicate the throne in the midst of the Russian Revolution of 1917. Radical Bolsheviks took power and formed a provisional government, and the tsar, his wife, Alexandra and their five children were imprisoned in the city of Yekaterinburg. In 1918, civil war broke out between the communist government’s Red Army and the anti-Bolshevik White Army. As the White Army advanced on Yekaterinburg, local authorities were ordered to prevent the rescue of the Romanovs, and in the early hours of July 17, the family was executed by firing squad. Those who remained alive after the bullets stopped flying were stabbed to death.
The Romanovs’ bodies were thrown down a mineshaft, only to be retrieved, burned and buried near a cart track. The remains of Nicholas, Alexandra and three of their daughters— Anastasia, Olga and Tatiana—were found in 1979, though the bodies were only exhumed in 1991 after the collapse of the Soviet Union, according to the AFP. As Tom Parfitt of the Times reports, DNA testing carried out at the time confirmed that the remains were authentic.
See here info on DNA analysis which was more controversial early on but is now considered much more reliable from medical & forensic analysis.
The Evolution of DNA Forensics and Its Impact on Solving Crimes By Sofia Quaglia - Oct 26, 2023 updated Oct 25, 2023
The evolution of DNA evidence has changed the field of forensic science. But how powerful a tool is it for solving crimes? Learn the history of DNA evidence and how it is used today.
So maybe DNA evidence is just all complete hooey but it's used in paternity lawsuits & in releasing mistakenly wrongly-accused criminals from prison, etc.
Eliminating individuals will not end the monarchy. The line of succession is theoretically infinite and, in fact, parliament can appoint anyone it chooses to be monarch. If the NWO were trying to end the monarchy, they would have to abolish the institution, not eliminate individuals.
Even though this article talks about the Queen admonishing citizens re: the "C19 jab" I'll never believe that she or any Royal took the experimental jab. Why would they do this when their entire history shows advocacy for homeopathy instead?
Others in the media have mentioned that both the Queen & Philip were vaxxed but WHY would they do this when all the Royals supposedly eschew allopathic medicine & have used homeopathic medicine generationally? Taking a synthetic vaxx just doesn't compute.
> The Royal Medicine: Monarchs' Longtime Love for Homeopathy
> The love of homeopathy by the British royal family is well known today, in part because Queen Elizabeth II is patron of the Royal London Homeopathic Hospital and because Prince Charles has taken an active role in his support for homeopathic and “complementary” medicine.
King Edward VIII (1894-1972), known as Prince Edward, Duke of Windsor, after his abdication in 1936, carried his homeopathic medicines in powder doses in his pocket. His brother, King George VI (1895-1952), also had a special love for homeopathy. He even named one of his prize racehorses Hypericum, after a homeopathic medicine...
> The Royal Family and Homeopathy: A Historic Journey of Advocacy and Impact ...
May 6, 2023 - Excerpt: Discover the rich history of the British royal family's connection to homeopathy, from Queen Victoria's early embrace to King Charles III's influential advocacy. .... The royal family's connection to homeopathy can be traced back to the early 19th century. Queen Victoria, who reigned from 1837 to 1901, became a fervent supporter of homeopathy after seeking treatment from the renowned homeopathic physician, Dr. James Manby Gully. Impressed by the positive results, she introduced homeopathic remedies to her immediate family, including her husband Prince Albert and their nine children. Queen Victoria's advocacy helped popularize homeopathy and led to its integration into the royal household's healthcare practices.
Following Queen Victoria's lead, subsequent generations of the royal family maintained an interest in homeopathy. King George VI, Queen Elizabeth II's father, was known to rely on homeopathic treatments to manage his chronic lung condition. His wife, Queen Elizabeth, the Queen Mother, also embraced homeopathy and received homeopathic care for various ailments.
King Charles, the eldest son of Queen Elizabeth II, has been one of the most prominent supporters of homeopathy within the royal family. His interest in alternative medicine, including homeopathy, is well-known. King Charles established the Foundation for Integrated Health in 1993, which aimed to explore and promote various alternative medical practices, including homeopathy.
Through his foundation, King Charles advocated for the integration of complementary therapies into the NHS and sought to bridge the gap between conventional medicine and alternative treatments.
Does this lengthy history of homeopathic medical use indicate Royals would take the jab?
Linda, your last question is neither here nor there, even if it were rhetorical only. The point is the Royals would happily kill their subjects - which brings me back full circle to Mr. Deadly Virus. That is the crux of the issue.
Didn't ever see this myself so looked it up just now & found a seemingly benign explanation. The image is of a "verger"- sort of a maintenance worker. Not very believable to me, though, as the entire endless ceremony was totally scripted so how could a "maintenance" worker IN A HOOD w/ a pole/rod have appeared center screen in the video for everyone to observe it??
Here's the UK Abby's supposed explanation, but no reason for the person to be in the video??
> "Mystery behind why the ‘grim reaper’ was at Charles’s coronation is finally solved" [sure]
Clip: The identity of the mysterious ‘Grim Reaper’ seen briefly lurking in the background during King Charles’ coronation has finally been revealed.
A clip of the sceptre-wielding figure, clad in a hooded black robe, was the source of much speculation throughout the weekend after going viral on Twitter.
Many viewers at home were left wondering who the ghostly silhouette could belong to, with many people joking that the Grim Reaper himself was paying Westminster Abbey a visit.
But the identity of the ghostly apparition has been revealed after the Abbey was contacted by Newsweek magazine.
They revealed that the person people saw walking in the background was only a verger, a member of the Abbey’s community who does not belong to the clergy but assists with religious services.
A verger is sometimes seen carrying a rod before a bishop or dean as a symbol of office, which explains its scythe-like instrument.
In a recent job vacancy advert for a verger at Ripon Cathedral, the clergy said they were looking for someone to be ‘involved in the presentation and maintenance of the Cathedral’.
Main duties and responsibilities included ‘ensuring effective communication’, ‘assisting with the effective management of all events, liturgical and secular in the Cathedral, ‘with the proper care, preparation and maintenance of all items used in services’, as well as many more tasks.
Here's flag falling over too and being grabbed. If you look closely though, it seems to be lifted up by the guard near the doorway before it tilts & is replaced into its holder. Do you see that? Maybe this is a ritual visualization of Elizabeth's demise (grim reaper) & the royals descending & so the grim reaper is not really about Charles' death per se but the Royals decline instead.
Btw watched only some of the endless ritual including that creepy march with all of the drums & precision feet (reminded me of the March of the Winkies in the WIzard of OZ. Right?
"Oh-RE-Oles, OH-Rioles" (music from The Wizard of Oz)> "Oh we love... the old one"???
Also watched some of Charles coronation, & it seemed oddly strained/joyless & kinda grim. Like, here we go, & we're not too happy about any of this forced coronation. Charles seemed peeved to me. On his most desired of all days?? And then watched some of the crazy standing Royals' vigil around QE's casket. Ramrod straight "obedience"?? What an eerie, wacky display.)
“What happened to manners, grace and sensitivity?” asked one UK journalist, married to Piers Morgan, of all people. This cracked me up. I can't think of anybody more ill mannered and sensitive than PM. (Well, maybe a few.) I've also been interested in this latest psyop. One after the other they come, thick as fleas on a junk-yard dog. And my busy mind keeps trying to find a credible reason for her disappearance and the proper Charlie's illness and all the other nonsense they feed the public. Aren't the royal families part of the global 'leaders'? Why implode them? They're all in it up to their eyeballs, aren't they? Ah, all these questions.
I'm going with two options: some sort of poison, which could be the injection (though why would she get the shot is a question) or some other toxin whether by chance or by design, or perhaps we have a domestic violence scenario, again whether an incidental injury or something worse in terms of a traumatic blow. They certainly are going to have to address this and we'll see how nutty the cover story is.
Incontestable is your observation of the Royals being a gauge to all Brits - if they're ok we're ok.
The fundamental source of interest in the Royals.
The American psyche is caught in fantasyland created by Disney and Hollywood, based in the real lives of European aristocracy. Pushing captivation of every ordinary girls mind in the princess narrative. Kate embodies the fantasy perfectly - she even more than Diana - in being a commoner with zero affiliation with the aristocracy.
For the archetypal princess to be missing from the story is to upset individual and collective psyche.
Highly symbolic of our current restructuring of life on planet earth.
Wow, food for thought~I find the Royals in Britain to be less than a waste of time to read about. Another distraction among many to divert our attention from the NWO and their agenda. But now you have really peaked my interest~I have that almost nauseous, disquieting spooky feeling like when you watch a really good ghost story movie and the scariest part is when you catch something out of the corner of your eye but you're not really sure and you feel the hair on the back of your head stand up. Geez Cynthia, and here I was skipping merrily down the sidewalk~😉 Keep 'em comin~the things we don't know...
Where are the ‘Royal’ children ~ surely you can’t control the behavior of the little ones. Are they attending school .. playing sports .. laughing and being ‘children’ when out in public ?
For me this reminds me of Thailand princess Ong Bha, who collapsed suddenly at 44 years old while walking her dogs on the royal palace grounds, in December of 2022. There have been basically no updates on her condition. Wikipedia simply lists her as still in a coma. A veil is pierced when it seems to be reaching the royals...
Exactly….any updates on the Thai Princess have been completely scrubbed from the internet
Wouldn't be surprised if they faked her death next. For all we know, she's alive and well, but simply prefers to stay away from the public spotlight.
As an English person, all I can think is that, if they are going to such lengths to hide the truth, then it must be very bad indeed.
Recall what happened to Kate's husband's mother, Diana. Once she had produced an heir and a spare, they had no more use for her. Looks like the same thing may be playing out....
Diana was entirely different.
Kate (not that I'm especially interested in any of the family, although this recent story is certainly curious) seems never to step out of line.. not even briefly...like she was made/programmed for the 'role'. Diana, on the other hand, became something of a lose canon, a liability.
Kate's surely as asset; great re PR for the org, well liked by the media, monarchy fans, etc. What purpose would doing away with her serve?
Good point, Diana had become a liability, also because of her campaign against land mines. Perhaps William, like his father, has a preference for a different mate? Who knows what's behind all this...
Rose Hanbury (having his baby?) and Thomas shooting himself (very odd that)....
How about Celine Dion? Isn't she part of the elite club? It is clear that she also had been injured by the mRNA shots. Looks like that in this global operation there are also collateral damages. Sasha Latypova said in one of her interviews that the master minds behind all this is nobody else then the Department of Defence. If this is a military operation, do you think they would care who gets the real shots and who doesn't? Why would the DOD be interested, since this is a military operation? That's not their concern. They have a mission and the only thing that matters to them is to accomplish it successfully. I don't deny that there may be much more behind the scenes. This is why investigating journalists are so important. Because at the end of the day, they will be the ones to uncover the truth.
A commenter on another site just questioned how Sasha came to have the documents about DOD complicity. Apparently, she banned a commenter on her site who asked her about it (I did not read the comment but the commenter can be rather brash from what I have read of him on others sites)
In any case, it did get me wondering. How DID she get all that info?
A bit off topic here, but people might want to keep an eye on the pfizer whistleblower case that Robert Barnes is litigating for Brooke Jackson. That story itself is quite interesting, but what is more chilling is the email Attny Barnes received from the United States Dept of Justice last week informing him in one sentance that they would be taking over the case.
I have watched Barnes on various sites over the past 2 years. He is a brilliant Constitutional lawyer.
There is a scheduled hearing in April in the ongoing case to determine if the case can go foreward. If it does go foreward that is when the DOJ will step in.
Thankfully, there are all type of hoops that the DOJ has to jump through, which Barnes is all set to implement should it be necessary.
In case you were not aware - the 1986 Vaccine Act that grants immunity from liability to pharma, also guarantees you your day in court in case your healthy little baby starts screaming in agony all night after a shot and never speaks a coherent word again.yu
The United States Vaccine Court. So you essentially suit the government, not the pharma company. And who represents the United States Government?
The Department of Justice.
How's THAT for scary?
I have listened to family members that went through the torturous process of being dragged through the mud in these cases. And the bold face lying by DOJ.
(I will probably be visited by the men in black for that little comment, but Mother of God, it is astonishing.)
Every movie we have watched since the 60's - Parallex View, Three Days of the Condor, Enemies of the State, Michael Clayton, and many more, all spell it out. And we think it's entertainment.
John Le Carre novels, too.
Sorry for the rant. Sometimes it is just so overwhelmingly stupifying.
Sorry, I write too fast.
Should be "sue", not "suit"
And "forward", not "foreward"
And the "yu" at end of sentence is just a flat out mistake.
It was Katherine Watt who reviewed the leaked Pfizer contract and the documents Brooke Jackson was using. Sasha works with Katherine to translate her research to the masses using her skills and experience with big pharma.
But why shut someone down instead of simply answering the question?
Thanks!
Judith, I think the Jackson case, operation Warp Speed, and other things show the DoD role. It’s not secret. Just that no one is talking about it
Would love any more info about this commenter / DOD document question. I thought / think Sasha is really above board but you never know, any info to look
Up appreciated. I was shocked to see how Robert Malone has an odd history and track record with this stuff too.
You also shouldn't forget the HHS (U.S. Health & Human Services), for they helped streamline COVID-19 vaccine production and disbursement to the masses. Their involvement makes perfect sense as they're simply an extension of the Medical Industrial Complex. And the NIH is under their auspices, too.
I wondered that about Celine. At this point, man I would be talking. Seriously, what can compensate you after you've been injured in that fashion? Afraid of death? There are worse fates.
You mean like the Boeing whistleblower?
That was death
if she actually got the 'vaccines,' she probably also made sure that her sons and the rest of her loved ones (and employees) got them, too. in which case she would not want to believe she is 'vaccine' injured.
Doubt she ever got any of the vaccines. And she certainly wouldn't allow her children or loved ones to have them, either. They aren't that stupid to do so.
This is not sound reasoning. Many “smart” people jabbed their kids to the gills. Fear is a funny thing
Yes, there's that.
Being a Brit, this is a big topic for a lot of us. Where the hell is Kate? Weird things are happening to the Royal Family such as William appearing with bruises on his neck after the so-called suicide of Thomas Kingston, son in law of Prince Michael of Kent, the masonic head. Plus Princess Anne's husband appearing with a black eye and claiming it to be a gardening accident. Not sure Charles has cancer: it may well be a ploy to promote a miraculous cure by Pfizer.
The thing is, the Royal Family has form - look at what happened to Di who knew she was going to be killed and was supposedly pregnant with her lover's son.
I didn't know about the bruising or of Anne's husband being in the black eye club just like her father, Prince Phillip.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13157259/Princess-Anne-husband-Sir-Tim-Laurence-black-eye-RNLI.html
They've all had black eyes at one time or other:
https://search.brave.com/images?q=queen+black+eyes&source=web
Probably just Adrenochrome after effects
Or Charles' cancer let's him abdicate to William, to serve whatever role he's been groomed for.
The Antichrist
I've heard that, too.
That would be Harry
Oh my God, would not have occurred to me.
They will all get cancer now that is cured by Pfizer.
Hanging out with the Skirpals.
Haha!
Do you have a link to the bruising evidence?
Also the Daily Mail link that Tirion, above, posted March 13
https://www.hellomagazine.com/royalty/514747/princess-anne-husband-tim-laurence-black-eye/
And where are the Skirpals?
It's called "SARCASM".
Western Civilization is eating itself.
"Abolishing monarchies would be one of the goals of the New World Order." never considered that.
but...if the current global situation is a contract killing orchestrated by the killers, it would make sense that they'd want to take out those they convinced to pay for it
and btw has that thai princess been seen in public lately?
"Abolishing monarchies would be one of the goals of the New World Order."
No, it would not. Of this I am 100% certain.
The British aristocracy is at the helm of the NWO! King Charles gave the speech in January 2021 which announced the Great Reset at WEF's Davos. Klaus Schwab was knighted by the Queen!
You really need to read this:
https://francesleader.substack.com/p/who-rules-the-world
And then, if you can face it, look at the other posts listed in this compendium:
https://francesleader.substack.com/p/black-nobility-101
You will learn that the British Royal Family are the Saxe Coburg & Gotha, descended from the Guelph who are at the top of the old dynasty from the Venetian Black Nobility.
The NWO is a totalitarian scheme to ensure that the existing ruling class continues to rule while the rest of humanity is enslaved without possibility of escape as explained here:
https://francesleader.substack.com/p/the-mother-of-all-false-flag-events
The United Nations has teamed with the World Economic Forum since 2019 to implement the UN Agenda 2030 Sustainable Development Goals, an interpretation of which is here:
https://francesleader.substack.com/p/agenda-2030-no-escape-no-objections
Here, in the UK, we hear rumours that there was a physical fight over the recent Christmas period in which Princess Kate was seriously injured. There has been no sight of her since that rumour went around. We think she is dead and everything we are seeing in the press is a cover up. If she subsequently 'dies' due to 'medical complications' we will know that her body has been on ice, waiting for the right moment in which to conduct a funeral.
You must understand that the Royals do commit murder, vis a vis the terrible assault on the Russian royals that you referenced.
There is also a Nostradamus quatrain which claims that King Charles will not reign for long.
The deck will be clear for William to take the throne and there are rumours that he is a very unsavoury character.
I am sorry to burst your bubble.... really I am.... but what happened to Princess Diana really should have woken Americans up to what our Royal family is really about.
Edit:
I have created a fresh post from the above with additional info if anyone is interested:
https://francesleader.substack.com/p/british-royals-are-black-nobility
Yes, agree w/you Frances on the Black Nobility & on how monarchies/elites often play out (as you have documented so convincingly in your BN histories). People should remember the intense Shakespearian drama behind the Charles, Diana & Camilla Royals story-line. Arranged marriage/marital infidelity, political manipulations/revelations, physical threats by the palace & Diana's eventual murder. And all of it played out in public in real time.
That intense Shakespearean drama would benefit from a title. May I suggest The Merry Wives of Windsor?
Any take on Thomas Kingston? Was he going to 'talk'?
There is a lot of speculation about him. Apparently he was a very moral man..... so who knows what he knew and what he may have done with that knowledge?
the kids have been seen on video looking 'normal' and even happy, so it's hard to believe they haven't seen their mother (or know that she's dead). after seeing the tragus on the ear purported to be catherine's (the car pic), I'm going with facelift. and if it hasn't healed enough yet, she wouldn't be appearing in photos.
People lie to children all the time! Also, why would Kate need a facelift? She was beautiful just as she was.
didn't say she needed one, I said she may have gotten one. people get what I would consider totally unnecessary plastic surgery all the time.
I’ve thought all along it was cosmetic surgery (maybe also abdominal surgery) and she can’t be seen in public until swelling and healing is complete. I hope it’s not more sinister than that.
I’m going with difficult pregnancy.
they'd surely say if she were pregnant, no? maybe a hysterectomy? that was my first thought when they said 'abdominal surgery,' but after seeing the picture of her ear (in the car with william, head turned away) I began thinking she had a facelift and doesn't want anyone to know.
No, not if it was a difficult one. And if it turns out not to be viable, then they don’t have to talk about it—drama averted.
Hum but who is the baby daddy? Thomas?
Whoa!!!
That is a possibility that I had not considered, Mzlizzi. I hope you are right.
However, I have a very ominous feeling about it. If she were in hospital with a wall of paparazzi around the doors, why weren't there reports of the children visiting? Why did William only go once? That suggests she wasn't there or she is dead. I don't trust the Black Nobs to ever tell the truth about anything, tbh...
Maybe there are tunnels. I don’t know.
Just a hunch.
While I don't disagree with the statement that the British Royal Family are Black Nobility having been a part of the Hapsburg dynasty your statement regarding the goal of the NWO being to remove the European Royal families is false.
That was very much part of the World Revolutionaries goal which was borne of the secret societies and was the reason for the removal and deaths of the French Royal family during the revolution and also the removal of the Russian royal family during their same revolution.
The occult group behind that were given payback for their rejection by these families when they sought to takeover Europe. At the time in England a similar strain was running the East India Co similar to the Dutch (really a joint venture) and these internationalists / corporatists were being thwarted by the Westphalian declaration and the creation of the modern nation state.
As a result they vowed to get payback on those who rejected their plan. The reason the RF have prospered is probably 2 fold. First the creation through birth of the Anglo Zio nation state which saw the likes of the Rothschild's and their co-religionists marry into English nobility and secondly their willingness to sacrifice their roles of the defenders of sovereignty to do these peoples bidding.
"your statement regarding the goal of the NWO being to remove the European Royal families is false." - Pardon? I did not make that statement. I was quoting Celia and then refuting it. Therefore the rest of your comment makes no sense to me. Sorry.
The statement was "Abolishing monarchies would be one of the goals of the New World Order." - to which you replied "No, it would not. Of this I am 100% certain."
My comment was a reply to that which I repeat is false.
The evidence for that is the generational aims of those behind the World Revolution. They created the French, Irish, American and Russian revolutions and the lodges were a tool to achieve that aim. Their goal has always been a war on Christianity and the over throw of the European Royal dynasties.
Thats where the Black Nobility argument runs into the long grass because it doesn't explain the brutal butchering of the French and Russian nobilities. After all they are all part of the same family.
The group responsible also saw the creation of communism and Zionism and facilitated the creation of Israel as a 'gift' to Mr Rothschild. They have been described as Sabbatean Frankists with links back to the secret societies of Germany which facilitated so much of the upheaval in Europe in the last 150 years.
But there is much more to that and its a complex web with many strands.
No, sorry. I do not buy that theory.
The British Crown (run by Venetian Black Nobility now established in the City of London) are responsible for attempting to annihilate any royal families who objected to their form of totalitarian globalism. They sponsored the Jesuits and secured the Jesuits as a military wing for the Pope. They undertook education projects in Germany which resulted in the establishment of the Illuminati and caused them to be disbanded by a very sensible Pope. Another was installed and he allowed the Jesuits back into action. It was Jesuit influence which triggered the revolutions in France, America and virtually anywhere else!
It was Jesuits who went on to develop Communism in their 'Reducciones' of South America. They infiltrated most of the higher education centres and taught communism to Marx, Lenin and many others. Their missionaries took Communism into China. Their students became the banksters who funded infiltrations into Russia and murdered the Russian Royal family.
You will note that it is always the City of London which instigates hatefests against the Russians, the Chinese and Iran.
The Temple B.A.R. (British Accreditation Registry) is controlled by the Black Nobility and ensures that every member worldwide, directly or indirectly obeys the RULE OF LAW. They have re-established the Roman Empire and they make sure that they employ Jews in all their top corporate positions because Jews make perfect human shields. People like you will always produce your ill-informed alternative histories, citing minor characters like the Sabbatean Frankists to muddy the waters and providing cover for the Black Nobility.
I am not sorry that you chose to challenge me. You have shown me, and undoubtedly many other readers, just how deceptive history can be and how it has been rewritten over and over to conceal the truth.
You might like to learn a little more about the Rule of Law, in which case I recommend that you study closely the following document:
https://francesleader.substack.com/p/what-does-the-rule-of-law-mean
I haven't chosen to 'challenge you' I pointed out your initial statement was wrong which I stand by.
Most of the rest of your comment I don't really disagree with up to a point but having looked at your blog and comments I would say that you are missing the most important ingredient.
A lot of this comes down to semantics and some is just plain wrong. Sabbatei Zevi is not muddying any waters its referencing a very important element missing from your analysis and that is what connects all these groups together and who do they serve?
You reference a lot of Walter Zeith in your analysis but appear to reject the Christian dimension. That I believe is pivotal to understanding this but because what connects all these elements together is Luciferianism. That comes in many flavours but is the bedrock of Freemasonry, Kabbalah as well as Judaism. I could see why someone might want to hide that away.
Because it is central to the goal of a movement whose goal is the destruction of Christianity and ultimately the seating of their own messiah in Jerusalem. Pike was clear enough what the end game was.
St Paul in Ephesian's 6:12 explains who the rulers of this world are and they are found in 'spiritual wickedness in high places'. The prince of this world is satan which is why he was able to offer Christ his dominion if only Hhe would worship him.
It might be suggestive of trying to hide that message in saying the Sabbatean element is 'muddying the waters.' Without understand that there can be no real clarity over what is happening.
It was the Pharisees who crucified Christ and have been at war with Christianity ever since.
For a true understanding you would need to show who the Black Nobility worship and how they connect to this group behind the World Revolution.
That aspect of this cannot be simply hidden away because it has been pivotal to understanding what has been happening in the west for the last few hundred years and overall since the death of Christ.
I will of course follow your link so thanks for that.
Absolutely right. If there is an orchestrated takedown of royals, it is by a force opposed to the NWO (White Hat/Q theory).
Apart from that, I remember reading a long time ago that royal wives were all transgenders and disposable as part of the Satanic cult, it's true that Kate does have a thick neck and large shoulders.
There is no White Hat or Q force opposed to the NWO. Royal wives are not transgenders because they have all produced children. The Royals are not Satanist or involved with any kind of cult. Kate is remarkably slim, too slim actually. She is not a man. Where on earth do you get all these crazy ideas?
Please read about atheists and nihilists. They are not Satanists!
The difference between you and I is you are dogmatic whereas I am not.
What do you think of Trump?
Is it dogmatic to insist on a reality check? To seek truth? If so then I agree that I am strongly dogmatic.
All prominent politicians in all 5-Eyes slave colonies are puppets of the Black Nobility. Trump is not a saviour. He is extremely dangerous.
https://francesleader.substack.com/p/so-trump-is-your-hero
Thank you for your response. At this point, I am well past debating and am watching events unfold.
I guess they mean abolishing monarchies that aren't in tow with the NWO agenda. So far, this doesn't describe the British monarchy nor the other European monarchies where NWO plots are in full swing (mass illegal immigration, vaccines, etc.) Those monarchies wouldn't be harmed since they're going along with the program perfectly.
You wrote a fascinating story! I wonder why should we not be interested in what the Royal Family is hiding? The more they play this game the more curious people will become. There is no way around it. I agree with Toby Rogers that the Princess has been very likely injured by the mRNA shots. I also agree with the Spanish journalist who claims that the Princess is very sick. Sasha Latypova wrote an interesting Substack on this story: she says that they are trying to eliminate the Royal Family, just like Celia said. The New World Order doesn't need any royals. Strange things are happening indeed. George Soros wrote a book many years ago, soon after the 2008 crisis. I remember he was talking about a New World Order. Back then, I had no clue what he was talking about.
Re: "Sasha Latypova wrote an interesting Substack on this story: she says that they are trying to eliminate the Royal Family, just like Celia said. The New World Order doesn't need any royals." -
(Critically, I agree w/ many others here who have already mentioned that the so-called Royals & monarchy world-wide are an intrinsic part of the NWO themselves so why would the NWO take out their very useful NWO Royals/puppets unless... stupidly & greedily... they are eating their own i.e."the - NWO - fish rots from the head down"???)
I have searched Sasha's ss articles to find a title or subject that might relate to your comment & found several Sasha stacks related to the overall NWO planning/plots that I've pasted in below.
fyi The Sasha ss re: Catherine Austin Fitts' & another re: the documentary are brilliant analyses.
> Why are they doing it? Eugenics to Pandemics Documentary - Historical and ideological background of the globalist death cult. - May 26, 2023 - Sasha Latypova
https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/why-are-they-doing-it-eugenics-to
> Why Are They Doing It? - "Going Direct Reset" explained by Catherine Austin Fitts
Feb 3, 2023 - Sasha Latypova
https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/why-are-they-doing-it
General Sasha archives link w/other related C19 scamdemic/globalists/NWO/Reset topics. https://sashalatypova.substack.com/archive?sort=top
> Breaking: Candid Camera Recording of Bill Gates and Tony Fauci Discussing Evil Plans
Finally! The smoking gun evidence found. - Mar 19, 2023 - Sasha Latypova
> Clarification of My Message on the Global Mass Murder Campaign I know whodunit, I only guess who ordered it. - Mar 9, 2023 - Sasha Latypova
> D4CE Symposium 5, Session III: Getting Away From the Control Grid - Doctors For Covid Ethics Symposium Series - Jan 25, 2023 - Sasha Latypova
> INTENT TO HARM - EVIDENCE OF THE CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT MASS MURDER BY THE US DOD, HHS, PHARMA CARTEL - This is an audio track of my presentation. Full video version is available here: https://www.bitchute.com/video/8ftbShzrkjl9/ - Dec 4, 2022 - Sasha Latypova
https://sashalatypova.substack.com/p/intent-to-harm-evidence-of-the-conspiracy
(Gabriella - if there is a specific Sasha link or title/heading to the Royals info can you share it w/us?)
I don't think they're really going to eliminate any royals here. Most likely, they'll just fake their deaths/disappearances and exile them somewhere with new aliases. We have seen this with the Romanovs and the French Bourbons that were allegedly killed in the French and Russian revolutions.
Hanz -
Allegedly killed? Do you have any links or cites w/confirmed info to share for your opinion?
Not sure what you say is true as there have been lots of archival documentation & artifacts plus archaeological evidence shared proving the royals in Russia & France were violently killed.
See for example this article w/very believable/confiming evidence & dated archival documents > Friday 23 July 1999 - Secret files tell of final terrors for Romanovs - Paul Lashmar
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/secret-files-tell-of-final-terrors-for-romanovs-1108026.html
Excerpt: The newly declassified files, compiled at great personal risk by British diplomats and secret agents, were handed over yesterday by the Foreign Secretary, Robin Cook, to his Russian counterpart, Igor Ivanov, at a ceremony at the Foreign Office. They contained hundreds of documents from the British archives on the death of the last Tsar and his family at the hands of the Bolsheviks.
The exchange of documents came as Mr Cook and Mr Ivanov signed a memorandum of co-operation between the archives of the two foreign ministries. In return Mr Ivanov handed over original documents captured by Soviet forces from the Germans at the end of the Second World War. They relate largely to the fate of British prisoners of war held by the Germans.
According to a Foreign Office spokesman many of the British files on the murder of the Romanov family were classified as "top secret" until this release. They contain voluminous encrypted correspondence between the Foreign Office and its representatives in the field from 1918 to 1920. Some are hand-written letters between King George, Nicholas's cousin, and the then foreign secretary, AJ Balfour.
The Russian royal family was related to many of Europe's dynasties, and the Bolshevik revolution sent a chill wind through the rest of Europe. The files show how much the murder of the Tsar and his family shook the British state and confirmed the worst fears of the brutal nature of the Russian revolution.
Once you read down thru this article on the chronology of the archival documentation, it seems impossible to me that all or most of this evidence was falsified. What do you think?
Also, isn't it convenient that soon after the White Army captured Ekaterinburg, they easily found 'proof' of remains near where the Romanovs were allegedly buried, which included priceless jewelry and trinkets strewn about? You'd think that if the Bolsheviks wanted to thoroughly cover-up incriminating evidence of their crimes that they would've easily taken all the prized possessions for themselves and dumped the bones in an area much harder to excavate than an empty mine shaft. This is especially true when you consider that they were the first to spread rumors about their royal captives still being alive. To me, it feels as though such evidence was planted to distract any potential investigators from looking at the right places.
I don't know what you are referring to here as "finding remains" since factual info I've read says that the Romanov bodies were recovered in 1979 & NOT in July 1918 during the capture of Ekaterinburg, which is what you are implying.
See dates of the capture timeline (when you say later included finding the Romanovs' remains after their murders by Bolsheviks on July 16-17) >
1918 > Murders of Czar Nicholas II of Russia and His Family - ThoughtCo
https://www.thoughtco.com/czar-nicholas-ii-of-russia-murder-1779216
[This is what you refer to but no mention of Romanovs' remains found.]
> "As the White Army gained ground and headed for Ekaterinburg, the Bolsheviks decided they must act swiftly. The Romanovs must not be rescued. At 2:00 a.m. in the morning on July 17, 1918, Nicholas, his wife, and their five children, along with four servants, were awakened and told to prepare for departure." etc etc
In fact, this article above says clearly >
"The remains were buried at two separate sites. An investigation soon after the murders failed to turn up the bodies of the Romanovs and their servants."
And the DNA identifications of the Romanovs' remains found much later in 1979 were not made until 1991 (as it was only from the mid 1980s-early 1990s when the technique became more widely available for forensic examination of remains in criminal cases).
One has to admit now that DNA identification is now considered standard procedures to ID remains in well-known cases. So were the Romanovs' discovered "DNA identified remains" a hoax too or is the DNA validation of the 1979 found remains real?
For one thing, the DNA evidence tied to the alleged Romanov remains has been contested, as mentioned in this article from 2004:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/8231000_Ongoing_Controversy_over_Romanov_Remains
Plus, there's also circumstantial evidence pointing to the Romanovs having lived after July 1918. Look up "The File on the Tsar" for more info:
https://duckduckgo.com/?va=e&t=ho&q=the+file+on+the+tsar&ia=web
Thanks for sharing your links & I'll have a look at the 2004 link later on today. The other link you shared "The File on the Tsar" was published in 1976 or BEFORE the so-called, identified Romanovs' remains were found in 1979 & identified in 1991. So don't think the 1976 book is authoritative at this point.
> "The file on the Tsar Hardcover - January 1, 1976 - amazon .com"
Instead see here > July 17, 2018 - DNA Analysis Confirms Authenticity of Romanovs’ Remains - Will Russia’s fallen royal family finally receive a full burial from the Orthodox Church? - Brigit Katz - Correspondent
https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/dna-analysis-confirms-authenticity-remains-attributed-romanovs-180969674/
Excerpt: Today marks the 100th anniversary of the execution of Nicholas II and his family, an event that toppled Russia’s Romanov dynasty. Yesterday, as the country was preparing to commemorate their deaths, Russian investigators announced that new DNA testing had confirmed that remains attributed to last tsar and his family are in fact authentic—a finding that may pave the way for the deceased royals to be buried with full rites by the Orthodox Church, according to Agence France-Presse.
The Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation, which is responsible for probing serious crimes, said DNA analysis “confirmed the remains found belonged to the former Emperor Nicholas II, his family members and members of their entourage.” As part of the new tests, investigators exhumed the body of Nicholas' father, Alexander III to prove that the two are related, and also took DNA samples from living members of the Romanov family, according to the Moscow Times.
The new findings are the latest development in a tangled dispute over the remains of the Romanovs, whose downfall was nigh after Nicholas II was forced to abdicate the throne in the midst of the Russian Revolution of 1917. Radical Bolsheviks took power and formed a provisional government, and the tsar, his wife, Alexandra and their five children were imprisoned in the city of Yekaterinburg. In 1918, civil war broke out between the communist government’s Red Army and the anti-Bolshevik White Army. As the White Army advanced on Yekaterinburg, local authorities were ordered to prevent the rescue of the Romanovs, and in the early hours of July 17, the family was executed by firing squad. Those who remained alive after the bullets stopped flying were stabbed to death.
The Romanovs’ bodies were thrown down a mineshaft, only to be retrieved, burned and buried near a cart track. The remains of Nicholas, Alexandra and three of their daughters— Anastasia, Olga and Tatiana—were found in 1979, though the bodies were only exhumed in 1991 after the collapse of the Soviet Union, according to the AFP. As Tom Parfitt of the Times reports, DNA testing carried out at the time confirmed that the remains were authentic.
See here info on DNA analysis which was more controversial early on but is now considered much more reliable from medical & forensic analysis.
The Evolution of DNA Forensics and Its Impact on Solving Crimes By Sofia Quaglia - Oct 26, 2023 updated Oct 25, 2023
https://www.discovermagazine.com/the-sciences/the-evolution-of-dna-forensics-and-its-impact-on-solving-crimes
The evolution of DNA evidence has changed the field of forensic science. But how powerful a tool is it for solving crimes? Learn the history of DNA evidence and how it is used today.
So maybe DNA evidence is just all complete hooey but it's used in paternity lawsuits & in releasing mistakenly wrongly-accused criminals from prison, etc.
Eliminating individuals will not end the monarchy. The line of succession is theoretically infinite and, in fact, parliament can appoint anyone it chooses to be monarch. If the NWO were trying to end the monarchy, they would have to abolish the institution, not eliminate individuals.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Succession_to_the_British_throne
They are the NWO.
House of Windsor have been effectively eliminating their credibility for quite some time, under Queen Elizabeth the Lesser. https://royalcentral.co.uk/uk/queen/the-queen-calls-out-the-selfishness-of-those-refusing-to-have-a-covid-vaccine-156297/
Now bring back Prince Philip as Mr. Deadly Virus.
Castigator -
Even though this article talks about the Queen admonishing citizens re: the "C19 jab" I'll never believe that she or any Royal took the experimental jab. Why would they do this when their entire history shows advocacy for homeopathy instead?
Others in the media have mentioned that both the Queen & Philip were vaxxed but WHY would they do this when all the Royals supposedly eschew allopathic medicine & have used homeopathic medicine generationally? Taking a synthetic vaxx just doesn't compute.
> The Royal Medicine: Monarchs' Longtime Love for Homeopathy
https://englishhistoryauthors.blogspot.com/2014/01/the-royal-medicine-monarchs-longtime.html
> The love of homeopathy by the British royal family is well known today, in part because Queen Elizabeth II is patron of the Royal London Homeopathic Hospital and because Prince Charles has taken an active role in his support for homeopathic and “complementary” medicine.
King Edward VIII (1894-1972), known as Prince Edward, Duke of Windsor, after his abdication in 1936, carried his homeopathic medicines in powder doses in his pocket. His brother, King George VI (1895-1952), also had a special love for homeopathy. He even named one of his prize racehorses Hypericum, after a homeopathic medicine...
> The Royal Family and Homeopathy: A Historic Journey of Advocacy and Impact ...
https://healingwithzac.com/blog/the-royal-family-and-homeopathy-a-historic-journey-of-advocacy-and-impact
May 6, 2023 - Excerpt: Discover the rich history of the British royal family's connection to homeopathy, from Queen Victoria's early embrace to King Charles III's influential advocacy. .... The royal family's connection to homeopathy can be traced back to the early 19th century. Queen Victoria, who reigned from 1837 to 1901, became a fervent supporter of homeopathy after seeking treatment from the renowned homeopathic physician, Dr. James Manby Gully. Impressed by the positive results, she introduced homeopathic remedies to her immediate family, including her husband Prince Albert and their nine children. Queen Victoria's advocacy helped popularize homeopathy and led to its integration into the royal household's healthcare practices.
Following Queen Victoria's lead, subsequent generations of the royal family maintained an interest in homeopathy. King George VI, Queen Elizabeth II's father, was known to rely on homeopathic treatments to manage his chronic lung condition. His wife, Queen Elizabeth, the Queen Mother, also embraced homeopathy and received homeopathic care for various ailments.
King Charles, the eldest son of Queen Elizabeth II, has been one of the most prominent supporters of homeopathy within the royal family. His interest in alternative medicine, including homeopathy, is well-known. King Charles established the Foundation for Integrated Health in 1993, which aimed to explore and promote various alternative medical practices, including homeopathy.
Through his foundation, King Charles advocated for the integration of complementary therapies into the NHS and sought to bridge the gap between conventional medicine and alternative treatments.
Does this lengthy history of homeopathic medical use indicate Royals would take the jab?
Linda, your last question is neither here nor there, even if it were rhetorical only. The point is the Royals would happily kill their subjects - which brings me back full circle to Mr. Deadly Virus. That is the crux of the issue.
Collapse the throne, collapse the West.
What happens to the enormous wealth of the Crown? An unforgettable image is the one of the grim reaper passing by during Charles’ coronation.
And the flag at the doorway fell at exactly the same time! (Caught by the soldier standing near it). Certainly a sign.
yes!
Didn't ever see this myself so looked it up just now & found a seemingly benign explanation. The image is of a "verger"- sort of a maintenance worker. Not very believable to me, though, as the entire endless ceremony was totally scripted so how could a "maintenance" worker IN A HOOD w/ a pole/rod have appeared center screen in the video for everyone to observe it??
Here's the UK Abby's supposed explanation, but no reason for the person to be in the video??
> "Mystery behind why the ‘grim reaper’ was at Charles’s coronation is finally solved" [sure]
Tom Sanders - Published May 11, 2023
https://metro.co.uk/2023/05/11/mystery-behind-why-the-grim-reaper-at-charless-coronation-is-solved-18769384/
Clip: The identity of the mysterious ‘Grim Reaper’ seen briefly lurking in the background during King Charles’ coronation has finally been revealed.
A clip of the sceptre-wielding figure, clad in a hooded black robe, was the source of much speculation throughout the weekend after going viral on Twitter.
Many viewers at home were left wondering who the ghostly silhouette could belong to, with many people joking that the Grim Reaper himself was paying Westminster Abbey a visit.
But the identity of the ghostly apparition has been revealed after the Abbey was contacted by Newsweek magazine.
They revealed that the person people saw walking in the background was only a verger, a member of the Abbey’s community who does not belong to the clergy but assists with religious services.
A verger is sometimes seen carrying a rod before a bishop or dean as a symbol of office, which explains its scythe-like instrument.
In a recent job vacancy advert for a verger at Ripon Cathedral, the clergy said they were looking for someone to be ‘involved in the presentation and maintenance of the Cathedral’.
Main duties and responsibilities included ‘ensuring effective communication’, ‘assisting with the effective management of all events, liturgical and secular in the Cathedral, ‘with the proper care, preparation and maintenance of all items used in services’, as well as many more tasks.
Here's flag falling over too and being grabbed. If you look closely though, it seems to be lifted up by the guard near the doorway before it tilts & is replaced into its holder. Do you see that? Maybe this is a ritual visualization of Elizabeth's demise (grim reaper) & the royals descending & so the grim reaper is not really about Charles' death per se but the Royals decline instead.
https://twitter.com/realjoegreeeen/status/1654774890237394945?r
Btw watched only some of the endless ritual including that creepy march with all of the drums & precision feet (reminded me of the March of the Winkies in the WIzard of OZ. Right?
"Oh-RE-Oles, OH-Rioles" (music from The Wizard of Oz)> "Oh we love... the old one"???
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mqajwnKq1Ts
The Winkies are the subjects of the "Wicked Witch of the West" who command their marching.
https://oldtimemusic.com/w3/the-meaning-behind-the-song-march-of-the-winkies-extended-version-by-the-mgm-studio-orchestra/
Also watched some of Charles coronation, & it seemed oddly strained/joyless & kinda grim. Like, here we go, & we're not too happy about any of this forced coronation. Charles seemed peeved to me. On his most desired of all days?? And then watched some of the crazy standing Royals' vigil around QE's casket. Ramrod straight "obedience"?? What an eerie, wacky display.)
https://inews.co.uk/news/queen-procession-live-stream-watch-coffin-buckingham-palace-westminster-hall-1855295
“What happened to manners, grace and sensitivity?” asked one UK journalist, married to Piers Morgan, of all people. This cracked me up. I can't think of anybody more ill mannered and sensitive than PM. (Well, maybe a few.) I've also been interested in this latest psyop. One after the other they come, thick as fleas on a junk-yard dog. And my busy mind keeps trying to find a credible reason for her disappearance and the proper Charlie's illness and all the other nonsense they feed the public. Aren't the royal families part of the global 'leaders'? Why implode them? They're all in it up to their eyeballs, aren't they? Ah, all these questions.
But why on Earth would royals receive the real injection? Wouldn't they have received a placebo of all people?
I'm going with two options: some sort of poison, which could be the injection (though why would she get the shot is a question) or some other toxin whether by chance or by design, or perhaps we have a domestic violence scenario, again whether an incidental injury or something worse in terms of a traumatic blow. They certainly are going to have to address this and we'll see how nutty the cover story is.
Yes, domestic violence was my thought.
The monarchs desperately trying to act normal when normality went out the door four years ago this week.
That's assuming they ever were truly "normal" to begin with. Their history of incest alone should prove to you they've always been abnormal.
Incontestable is your observation of the Royals being a gauge to all Brits - if they're ok we're ok.
The fundamental source of interest in the Royals.
The American psyche is caught in fantasyland created by Disney and Hollywood, based in the real lives of European aristocracy. Pushing captivation of every ordinary girls mind in the princess narrative. Kate embodies the fantasy perfectly - she even more than Diana - in being a commoner with zero affiliation with the aristocracy.
For the archetypal princess to be missing from the story is to upset individual and collective psyche.
Highly symbolic of our current restructuring of life on planet earth.
Wow, food for thought~I find the Royals in Britain to be less than a waste of time to read about. Another distraction among many to divert our attention from the NWO and their agenda. But now you have really peaked my interest~I have that almost nauseous, disquieting spooky feeling like when you watch a really good ghost story movie and the scariest part is when you catch something out of the corner of your eye but you're not really sure and you feel the hair on the back of your head stand up. Geez Cynthia, and here I was skipping merrily down the sidewalk~😉 Keep 'em comin~the things we don't know...
Where are the ‘Royal’ children ~ surely you can’t control the behavior of the little ones. Are they attending school .. playing sports .. laughing and being ‘children’ when out in public ?
they are with their mom, gramma and grampa on Epstein Island
Add to the questions - why have other kings and queens around the world suddenly abdicated their thrones??